I'm confused, you deleted the supporting elements keyword list for both low accuracy patterns and the keywords still appeared for the first data set. For the 2nd data set with no keywords wouldn't the low accuracy patterns hit because you removed the key word list from them. Great video btw!
For SSN each primary match MSFT has is slightly different. Ex: XXX XX XXXX vs XXXXXXXXX vs XXX-XX-XXXX. So if you want the no keyword you may need to remove it from each definition.
Thank you for all your videos.
Glad you liked them!
Want more on XML based SIT creation.
Good job 👌
I just got around to making a video where I cover xml design.
ua-cam.com/video/ugUpjGqCXe8/v-deo.html
Great video! Where did you get the Microsoft Information Protection overview from?
I think I got it a while back from an ignite presentation.
Doug do you have any videos on AIP?
Yep I have 3 videos on it.
MIP - Sensitivity Label Overview
ua-cam.com/video/_1uZrhS7wM8/v-deo.html
I'm confused, you deleted the supporting elements keyword list for both low accuracy patterns and the keywords still appeared for the first data set. For the 2nd data set with no keywords wouldn't the low accuracy patterns hit because you removed the key word list from them. Great video btw!
For SSN each primary match MSFT has is slightly different. Ex: XXX XX XXXX vs XXXXXXXXX vs XXX-XX-XXXX. So if you want the no keyword you may need to remove it from each definition.