So it missed the landing spot, think of all that lovely data they collected. better that it all goes awry now than when its fully operational, my heart goes out to all those who spent so long manufacturing and getting the rocket ready for launch. Well done all New Glenn looked beautiful lifting off, you should be proud.
@@jimfoard5671If New,Glen had gone to the distance of the moon, that would have been a major failure It put it's payload into middle earth orbit for testing of Blue Ring subsystem.
Maybe. Or maybe it was not on the correct trajectory for landing. Either way, probably FTS destroyed the vehicle. Still, a great success for a first flight.
Same. I've played it back several times. The thing was only going about 45 mph when it cleared the tower. The Space Shuttle was going over 100 kts in nearly the span of its own length on launch.
You are right, I happen to be in Kissimmee for the Mecum car auction. I drove to jetty pier park last night and had a great seat for the launch. You are spot on about the slow liftoff. After seeing about 12 night launches, mostly Musk ships I was a little worried it was not going to clear the pad. Watching it punch through the clouds and light them all up was great.
my thought exactly, compared to Falcon 9, the NG was slow on both max-q and meco. Seeing how much more thrust the BE-4 engines have, I was a bit dissappointed. But alltogether nice to see they got it into space
Honestly, that was a successful mission. SpaceX had like 41 failures of Falcon 9 landings, but that was never the primary mission and the boosters were expendable. So not landing this one isn't really a horrible thing. Getting to orbit was huge, payload deploy is huge.
Far too high reentry speed destroyed cowling around engine cluster. So it started spin without control. And was subject to RUD while atmosphere became denser.
Even if they were, they will need to adapt and make changes if they want to do better on the landing next time around. Bezos, you need to use the SpaceX school of learning. You launch then pick apart the data and adapt.
This flight was a test, meaning that it is meant to assess the whole system capabilities and readiness, as well as it´s vulnerabilities just like SpaceX routinely does.
Good to see New Glen finally launch successfully. As for the booster, landing a booster is not easy and will probably take a few tries before they are successful. All in all, the launch was incredibly successful. At least none of their engines failed at launch and they got the second stage into orbit successfully.
The guys at Blue Origin did a terrific job. I think it is very likely they'll stick the landing next time. And if not next time, the time after. The lack of cameras needs to be re-thought. This is potentially all free publicity for Bezos, Blue Origin, Kuiper, and Amazon. Plus, as NASA always said, it is important to inspire the next generation. -- It is is a little bit like not broadcasting an NFL game because winning the game is more important than fancy cameras and distracting the players with interviews.
Of course no NFL team or league would let you put their game on YT for free. Maybe Bezos thinks Musk is a fool for giving away what could be sold on pay-per-view? Maybe, but I think Bezos just hasn't had the free publicity aspect suggested to him properly yet.
Can anyone point me to this video but with actual human voice over that understands how intonation and stress works please? This is unbearable. "Greater in space, mobility" WTF
Maybe BO did not fully throttle up the BG-1 but I noticed at +1 min BG1 was less than half the altitude and speed that SpaceX realizes on their routine launches. Further stage one was nowhere near Falcon9 altitude and speed when MECO was reached. The visuals seems to me to show the booster in a slow tumble for about one minute before telemetry was lost? Congratulations to BO for a great advance, a lot of effort with very talented people working hard has made first attempt with a new system to reach orbit a huge success!!! Again congratulations to all at BO for a job well done. Ray
The speed was probably the same. BO just sent their telemetry in feet and miles per hour, which will appear about twice as slow as Space X KPH and Meters per second.
4:07 "The non-competitive nature of the space industry" I think someone ought to tell China, Russia India, Japan, the EU and Elon. Bezos can be as non-competitive as he wants, but he won't kid any of the other major players into not competing.
Even spacex doesn't achieved like this in its first flight, Blue Origin have done it weather in second stage separation or reach Orbit although it doesn't land as accepted, it's a successful mission
Different philosophies. BO is like NASA take time and money to be perfect--but still fail a bit. SpaceX iterates with planned crashes. When BO lands all pieces of their rocket before Starship, BO can claim validation for their outdated model.
Just think maybe the new Dream chaser could use the new heat shield design that SpaceX is testing on Test flight 7 they are smaller and lighter, not ceramic tile , a lot of possibilities!
Notice they compare it with the Saturn 5 (And not a Starship/super heavy booster) Still half the weight of a Saturn 5 (and 1/3rd of a ship/booster take off weight) The real comparison is "payload to orbit". But that is too embarrassing.
Kudos to Bezos and Musk for developing space technology primarily through corporate investment, instead of the old method of developing space technology primarily via taxpayer boondoggle pork-barrel projects that certain legacy technology companies use. Taxpayers should focus on funding space research and primary materials science, not rocket production.
This first launch was spectacular and mostly a great success! It achieved almost all objectives. A great triumph for a brand new rocket. Well done BO.!
if, and before the ISS is decommisioned and deorbited, could NASA decouple the Cupola_module, pack it in protective blanket , lift the orbit for intermediate storage? Then the beautiful (and quite heavy ) Cupola could be integrated easily into the next space-station or even ship!
Eager to hear what happened. Loss of signal 84,000 feet and 4,200+ mph is nowhere near I would expect an RUD. Must be an engine problem. 💥 Disappointing that the booster did not make it into the lower atmosphere. This video was very kind to B.O. hopefully they will figure this out in under 1-3 years. It does show promise as a single use launch vehicle but that is not going to work financially. 🤷♂️
It was a S L O W takeoff like the Saturn V, but I assume that was per design. if it was really underpowered at takeoff it never would have made it to orbit.
The video-feed from the launch was less than impressive...but they did get into space, so got that going for them Will be interesting to see how many flights they manage to get this year
As of 1/15, SpaceX has launched 439 times, with 436 full mission successes, 3 failures and 1partial failure. So 4 loses. Thats amazing if you think about it. Just yesterday, a Falcon 9 delivered two Moon landers into orbit.
sattelite broadband will never replace fibreand 1000Gb/s ever. It just ain't physically possible. musk knows this but still is carrying on with his quest.
Dream Chaser needs some old school mechanics that can make things come together instead of the snails pace it’s at , anybody motivated over there or what ?
@@kurknielsen starship can already go to orbit. They just haven't yet because they don't want starship stuck in orbit. If you were paying attention they proved the relight works .so possibly the next launch they will commit to orbit. While Bozo was careless and went for orbit bon the first try. Not knowing if there would possibly be a problem locking new Glenn in orbit. It should be called old Glenn. It is 13 years old.
The first SpaceX attempt to have a controlled landing of the Falcon 9 booster occurred on September 29, 2013. The result was an uncontrolled crash into the ocean. According to the logic of the OP, Falcon 9 boosters are not “re-usable”.
@@furriesinouterspaceUnited Bezos Fan-boi.... tell us how many satellites to orbit on Blue Orgasm ? How many tons of cargo to the ISS on the ballistic suborbital carnival ride ? You're simping for Jeff and projecting.
Why are you showing animations of the booster landing when it actually crashed in the ocean? We want to see the real footage. SpaceX never concealed their failures. Why would a creator named "SpaceX Community" be running cover for Bezos? Also, you didn't explain "something weird". I thought something fishy when the broadcast on screen telemetry stopped right at booster separation. Great job reporting and BO propaganda.
What are you talking about? Starship is nearly twice the cost of BO New Glenn... Even Musk is on record saying "if not for the Moon lander contract, SpaceX would be bankrupt" Its fast approaching the costs of Artemis SLS. And those are just estimates based on material and labor. Not what they are actually spending. And while really entertaining, they have yet to reach orbit. (sorry, these are test flights. none have reached orbit) SpaceX is bleeding money, but that's okay...
The way Blue Origin is building these rockets and motors they better get their act together fast. One launch per quarter isn't exactly blazing fast re-iteration.
New Glenn NG-1 has no landing and only boosters are powerful I saw two girls speech and they keep rocket boost and legs Blue Origin lives steam You can't win
BO needs more testing. SpaceX makes it look easy. SpaceX is the new leader in space travel the reason why is the testing that was performed. They pushed everything to the limit and then push more.
Dream-chaser looks a lot like the next-to-useless shuttle program that kept us from having much that could have easily been in existence by now. Disappointing.
Space x is obviously always going to be better, but if bezos takes them more than a year to catch a booster, then it's completely obviously who the better company is.
I have serious doubts of the correctness of these opinions in these first hours. The arrogance level to believe these folks know-all makes me more doubtful of their intelligence.
Oh wait, after listening to this non-explanation click-bait, I now have a much much lower opinion of this so-called content. This is why God invented toilets' flush-handles.
Bezos needs to buy a few Starlinks so we can all watch it together
😂😂😂😂
😅😅😅😅😅😅
Lol yes
Probably would need Rocket Mortgage too, if they run out of money.
Right 😂😂
It sure would be nice if these videos didn't drone on and on about everything BUT what the title is saying the video is about.
You're watching a video about New Glenn on a UA-cam channel called SpaceX Community. You thought it'd be informative? 😅
So it missed the landing spot, think of all that lovely data they collected. better that it all goes awry now than when its fully operational, my heart goes out to all those who spent so long manufacturing and getting the rocket ready for launch. Well done all New Glenn looked beautiful lifting off, you should be proud.
In 1969, so the legend goes, Apollo 11 traveled 238,000 miles out into space. How many miles up did Blue Origin's New Glenn Rocket go in 2025?
when telemetry freezes at 84000 feet, its hard to claim they got all this great telemetry back.
@@johnhelmich8311They got a lot more data than they showed on the launch stream.
@@jimfoard5671If New,Glen had gone to the distance of the moon, that would have been a major failure
It put it's payload into middle earth orbit for testing of Blue Ring subsystem.
OBVIOUSLY, Phil, you weren't one that LOST sleep & time... YESTERDAY NIGHT either‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️
The B.O. booster had a problem similar to what the first Starship boosters had due to liquid cavitation caused by negative acceleration.
Water ice ingestion on landing.
Maybe. Or maybe it was not on the correct trajectory for landing. Either way, probably FTS destroyed the vehicle. Still, a great success for a first flight.
@@hawkdsl To you have a reference confirming that Blue O is using oxygen rich gas to pressurize like Starship does?
It's too bad then that they didn't learn from SpaceX's experience and had taken measures (like SpaceX did) to prevent it.
Probably.
I can’t believe how slow it took off, I thought was gonna fall over for a second
Same. I've played it back several times. The thing was only going about 45 mph when it cleared the tower. The Space Shuttle was going over 100 kts in nearly the span of its own length on launch.
You are right, I happen to be in Kissimmee for the Mecum car auction. I drove to jetty pier park last night and had a great seat for the launch. You are spot on about the slow liftoff. After seeing about 12 night launches, mostly Musk ships I was a little worried it was not going to clear the pad. Watching it punch through the clouds and light them all up was great.
Thrust to weight ration is low engine are not performing well enough.
Too heavy, too much fuel used, none left for booster landing. MAJOR problem is the engines are undersized.
my thought exactly, compared to Falcon 9, the NG was slow on both max-q and meco. Seeing how much more thrust the BE-4 engines have, I was a bit dissappointed. But alltogether nice to see they got it into space
What a shitty clickbait video...
Honestly, that was a successful mission. SpaceX had like 41 failures of Falcon 9 landings, but that was never the primary mission and the boosters were expendable. So not landing this one isn't really a horrible thing. Getting to orbit was huge, payload deploy is huge.
Yes but what happened
you got click baited.
It was a success in failure. 🤓
Same as happened most of the time with Starship boosters 😁
Who annoyed to the animation of flight
We are very spoiled with Starlink quality Im afraid.,
Me annoyed to crash the booster.
How about just get to the point instead of waffle
Those Rocket engines looked really beautiful under power . BO have finally Launched New Glen , well done team !
Far too high reentry speed destroyed cowling around engine cluster. So it started spin without control. And was subject to RUD while atmosphere became denser.
source?
Water ice ingestion on landing. Same problem SS had.
What's the minimum possible reentry speed... and why?
Not much about first stage failure to land. One minute and inconclusive at that. Click bait only.
They're planning 6-8 flights this year? Have they even begun building other rockets?
Yes, literally showed tail two behind the two hosts in their stream tonight
Yes, they have 3 upperstages (almost) ready and 1-2 boosters under production
yes actually they have quite a few second stages, and I think 2 or 3 first stages in production
Yes. Being delivered by the USPS.
Even if they were, they will need to adapt and make changes if they want to do better on the landing next time around. Bezos, you need to use the SpaceX school of learning. You launch then pick apart the data and adapt.
Next start in five years
Thank you for all the information you give us😊😊😊😊😊😊
Did you note the speed as it approached 200,000 ft? Check Mach number and dynamic pressure!
Congrats on partial success, looking forward to more 👍
Thank you for an unbiased video. I almost didn't watch because of the channel name; I am so sick of fan boys. Great video and very well done.
This flight was a test, meaning that it is meant to assess the whole system capabilities and readiness, as well as it´s vulnerabilities just like SpaceX routinely does.
Good to see New Glen finally launch successfully. As for the booster, landing a booster is not easy and will probably take a few tries before they are successful. All in all, the launch was incredibly successful. At least none of their engines failed at launch and they got the second stage into orbit successfully.
Took you long enough, but still MILES behind Space X... only the truth
Actually, they are miles ahead of Starship... literally.
@@kurknielsen New Glenn competes with Falcon Heavy. Starship is much bigger and is pursuing full reusability.
Congrats to the Blue Origin and Atlas Space Ops teams for an amazingly successful mission!
Bezo needs to file more protests against SpaceX so he can try to catch up.
The guys at Blue Origin did a terrific job. I think it is very likely they'll stick the landing next time. And if not next time, the time after.
The lack of cameras needs to be re-thought. This is potentially all free publicity for Bezos, Blue Origin, Kuiper, and Amazon. Plus, as NASA always said, it is important to inspire the next generation. -- It is is a little bit like not broadcasting an NFL game because winning the game is more important than fancy cameras and distracting the players with interviews.
Of course no NFL team or league would let you put their game on YT for free. Maybe Bezos thinks Musk is a fool for giving away what could be sold on pay-per-view? Maybe, but I think Bezos just hasn't had the free publicity aspect suggested to him properly yet.
Morning, Lucas. Thank you for the video
But BO is there another booster ready to launch? Or do we have to wait another decade?
They said the next one is visible through the window right behind the sweet blonde commenting at the BO site.
SpaceX experienced several failures before successfully landing a booster on a barge
Can anyone point me to this video but with actual human voice over that understands how intonation and stress works please? This is unbearable. "Greater in space, mobility" WTF
"Saturn f-five" - what's that? Sounds like a typo being read out verbatim
Maybe BO did not fully throttle up the BG-1 but I noticed at +1 min BG1 was less than half the altitude and speed that SpaceX realizes on their routine launches. Further stage one was nowhere near Falcon9 altitude and speed when MECO was reached. The visuals seems to me to show the booster in a slow tumble for about one minute before telemetry was lost? Congratulations to BO for a great advance, a lot of effort with very talented people working hard has made first attempt with a new system to reach orbit a huge success!!! Again congratulations to all at BO for a job well done. Ray
The speed was probably the same. BO just sent their telemetry in feet and miles per hour, which will appear about twice as slow as Space X KPH and Meters per second.
We congratulate the Blue O's team on their success, in this game, you have to win every time. Their is no margin. win, or people die.
4:07 "The non-competitive nature of the space industry"
I think someone ought to tell China, Russia India, Japan, the EU and Elon.
Bezos can be as non-competitive as he wants, but he won't kid any of the other major players into not competing.
Even spacex doesn't achieved like this in its first flight, Blue Origin have done it weather in second stage separation or reach Orbit although it doesn't land as accepted, it's a successful mission
It didn’t take SpaceX a long 24 years to get to that point either!
Different philosophies. BO is like NASA take time and money to be perfect--but still fail a bit. SpaceX iterates with planned crashes. When BO lands all pieces of their rocket before Starship, BO can claim validation for their outdated model.
@@Brad-vs1lk But they used up more rockets 😃
Old Glen will be completely operational in about another 5 years!
blue origin is the real world equivalent of Hammer tech vs stark industry's in the marvel universe 😂
How much did this launch cost?
Thanks
They're not going to get anywhere launching once per quarter.
Lets see what they learn from it and how fast they adapt and turn around and do it again....
Returned but speed to high ,the heating was catastrophic.,but it can be fixed with the data collected, well done bo.
Water ice ingestion on landing. Same problem SS had.
Everyone is British
Indeed we are 👍
I guess I am use to Raptor thrust being faster getting off the launch pad. NG-1 just looked slow.
Just think maybe the new Dream chaser could use the new heat shield design that SpaceX is testing on Test flight 7 they are smaller and lighter, not ceramic tile , a lot of possibilities!
Notice they compare it with the Saturn 5 (And not a Starship/super heavy booster) Still half the weight of a Saturn 5 (and 1/3rd of a ship/booster take off weight) The real comparison is "payload to orbit". But that is too embarrassing.
Kudos to Bezos and Musk for developing space technology primarily through corporate investment, instead of the old method of developing space technology primarily via taxpayer boondoggle pork-barrel projects that certain legacy technology companies use. Taxpayers should focus on funding space research and primary materials science, not rocket production.
Lovely that more are coming into to space race. Adastra!
The Blade Fins are the problem, they become unstable shatter, due to turbulence, and cause loss of control!
Why didn’t it land, spacex let us know?
This first launch was spectacular and mostly a great success! It achieved almost all objectives. A great triumph for a brand new rocket. Well done BO.!
Yup. On the pad for how long prior to launch?
How many problems causing delays?
Jeff still trying to SUE his way into Space?
if, and before the ISS is decommisioned and deorbited, could NASA decouple the Cupola_module, pack it in protective blanket , lift the orbit for intermediate storage?
Then the beautiful (and quite heavy ) Cupola could be integrated easily into the next space-station or even ship!
It was a pretty launch.
Where was the on-board video? 😴
Yes, video is much more important than actually achieving goals ak muskrats.
Maybe if Bozo was working on his rocket instead of sueing everyone he would have a flying rocket that can land a lot softer
Eager to hear what happened. Loss of signal 84,000 feet and 4,200+ mph is nowhere near I would expect an RUD. Must be an engine problem. 💥 Disappointing that the booster did not make it into the lower atmosphere. This video was very kind to B.O. hopefully they will figure this out in under 1-3 years. It does show promise as a single use launch vehicle but that is not going to work financially. 🤷♂️
You sure? Everybody says the landing burn with three engines took place, and then was silence.
So I’m guessing we’ll see another flight in ten more years .
LOL a the 4 Rocket scientists in the comments who are absolutely sure why the landing failed. Did Jeff Bezos call you?
You can't tell me there weren't problems on liftoff. She did want to get up & fly.
It was a S L O W takeoff like the Saturn V, but I assume that was per design. if it was really underpowered at takeoff it never would have made it to orbit.
To bad it didn't finish another few years before the next launch
The video-feed from the launch was less than impressive...but they did get into space, so got that going for them
Will be interesting to see how many flights they manage to get this year
That thing is as slow as I semi
BO is struggling lifting off the ground too heavy, despite of it carrying a miniature satellite.
Congrats to BO. People forget how many losses SpaceX had to get to a successful launch and placing a satellite in orbit.
As of 1/15, SpaceX has launched 439 times, with 436 full mission successes, 3 failures and 1partial failure. So 4 loses. Thats amazing if you think about it. Just yesterday, a Falcon 9 delivered two Moon landers into orbit.
Damn, only 25 years to get to orbit. At this rate, Bezos might survive to see them land a booster.
sattelite broadband will never replace fibreand 1000Gb/s ever. It just ain't physically possible. musk knows this but still is carrying on with his quest.
At the rate starships blow they need a lot more
The women on the promo and presentation video are annoying as fak. The name should be Blue Oyster, the feminist rocket instead.
I'm looking forward to the next series of BO flights. The capability will be amazing, put you Muskovite fan boys to shame.
Sorry, I think you are wrong. That's not Dreamchaser, that's Farscape-1....I wonder when will they reveal Moya. Now, that would be just something. :D
Dream Chaser needs some old school mechanics that can make things come together instead of the snails pace it’s at , anybody motivated over there or what ?
We are spoiled by starlink.
All congrats to BO for successfully orbiting their first satellite. I wish them well in their next attempt at booster recovery.
It's a shame it will be 10 years before another attempt
How many yrs do you predict for Starship reaching orbit?
Coming this year
@@kurknielsen starship can already go to orbit. They just haven't yet because they don't want starship stuck in orbit. If you were paying attention they proved the relight works .so possibly the next launch they will commit to orbit. While Bozo was careless and went for orbit bon the first try. Not knowing if there would possibly be a problem locking new Glenn in orbit. It should be called old Glenn. It is 13 years old.
According to what Musk had said, Starship should have already made several trips to Mars.
Tell USA it's as tall as a football field.Miles, feet, pounds,... Are we plowing a field with oxen? this is science. Use metric.
The Apollo computers used metric.
So the first stage isn't re-usable.
When the next launch? 2027?
Bezios said they're 'not competitive'. Finally he's said something I believe.
Bruh. 15 flights this year.
They're literally second only to space x now.
They are having a comeback.
Bro what, stop simping for musk 😂
The first SpaceX attempt to have a controlled landing of the Falcon 9 booster occurred on September 29, 2013. The result was an uncontrolled crash into the ocean. According to the logic of the OP, Falcon 9 boosters are not “re-usable”.
No, he said they’re not competitors.
@@furriesinouterspaceUnited
Bezos Fan-boi.... tell us how many satellites to orbit on Blue Orgasm ?
How many tons of cargo to the ISS on the ballistic suborbital carnival ride ?
You're simping for Jeff and projecting.
Wow they use BLUE tape. Awesome
Dominated with Starhip rockets 😂
Concur. I know it is an EGO thing, but I think the OLIGARCHS can work together to MAKE SPACE GREAT AGAIN 😅
If he would have been faster he would have already worked through sticking the landing a lot softer.. LOLOL BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH. HAAAAAAAA HAAAAAAAA
Tell us the reason then.
Near earth orbit isn’t space.
What a waste of Paper! As if there is such a thing...
I CANNOT GET OVER THE "CAVEMAN USE FIRE! GO TO SPACE!"
Why are you showing animations of the booster landing when it actually crashed in the ocean? We want to see the real footage. SpaceX never concealed their failures. Why would a creator named "SpaceX Community" be running cover for Bezos? Also, you didn't explain "something weird". I thought something fishy when the broadcast on screen telemetry stopped right at booster separation. Great job reporting and BO propaganda.
Nobody lands the first time.
Wernher von Braun did.
Lucky Trump won. Jeff would have got everything, despite the cost difference. Congrats to them anyway👍
Bro, space x live streamed their launches with falcon 1 at that they don't have any starlink connection 😂
What are you talking about? Starship is nearly twice the cost of BO New Glenn... Even Musk is on record saying "if not for the Moon lander contract, SpaceX would be bankrupt" Its fast approaching the costs of Artemis SLS. And those are just estimates based on material and labor. Not what they are actually spending. And while really entertaining, they have yet to reach orbit. (sorry, these are test flights. none have reached orbit) SpaceX is bleeding money, but that's okay...
Booster lander will come in time. Space X lost multiple boosters before they achieved success. Time will tell. It is good to see the competition.
The way Blue Origin is building these rockets and motors they better get their act together fast. One launch per quarter isn't exactly blazing fast re-iteration.
Yep…. It didn’t :;
All that time so it will go perfectly. ????????????!!?
most likely the engine bay on the booster overcooked on reentry leading to a rud they likely failed that lesson that spacex barely managed to get past
Now do it 400 more times WITH successful booter reuse.
New Glenn NG-1 has no landing and only boosters are powerful I saw two girls speech and they keep rocket boost and legs Blue Origin lives steam
You can't win
BO needs more testing. SpaceX makes it look easy. SpaceX is the new leader in space travel the reason why is the testing that was performed. They pushed everything to the limit and then push more.
Blue Origin... the rocket company of the WEF.
Dream-chaser looks a lot like the next-to-useless shuttle program that kept us from having much that could have easily been in existence by now.
Disappointing.
FAA going to ground New Glenn?
He used my natural gas idea 😔 dharma is real
Space x is obviously always going to be better, but if bezos takes them more than a year to catch a booster, then it's completely obviously who the better company is.
I have serious doubts of the correctness of these opinions in these first hours. The arrogance level to believe these folks know-all makes me more doubtful of their intelligence.
Oh wait, after listening to this non-explanation click-bait, I now have a much much lower opinion of this so-called content. This is why God invented toilets' flush-handles.
Jeff Who?
Terrible video feeds . Shaky technical operation . Billions wasted on it all .