Finally a budget Super Telephoto that worth buying - TTArtisan 500mm f/6.3 (FF E/Z/RF/L)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 19 лип 2024
  • Super telephoto lenses are usually super expensive. The budget super telephoto lenses have terrible image quality. However this ‪@TTArtisan‬ 500mm f/6.3 lens could be the first budget super telephoto lens (at least the first one i tried) that's worth buying!
    To purchase the lens directly from TTArtisan*: ttartisan.myshopify.com/produ...
    If you are from New Zealand, here is the NZ website: www.ttartisan.co.nz/
    Amazon L-mount*: amzn.to/3PsAr9y
    Amazon Canon RF*: amzn.to/3LA67Zk
    Amazon Sony E*: amzn.to/3ENjbH8
    Amazon Nikon Z*: amzn.to/3ELJr4R
    *Affiliated link
    Camera gear I used to shoot this video:
    Panasonic Lumix S5II | Lumix S 24mm f/1.8
    Instagram: / photo_by_richard
    My Miniature Photography Instagram: / toycapturer
    Facebook: / photobyrichard
    0:00 TTArtisan 500mm f/6.3
    2:35 Image Sharpness
    3:45 Close up
    4:25 Bokeh
    5:15 Vignetting
    5:39 Chromatic Aberration
    6:28 Distortion
    6:56 Lens Flare
    7:43 Sunstars
    8:29 Design & Build Quality
    11:23 Videography
    12:22 Final Thoughts + Sample Photos
    #ttartisan #ttartisan500mm5.6
  • Наука та технологія

КОМЕНТАРІ • 70

  • @TheRealRichardWong
    @TheRealRichardWong  10 місяців тому +7

    Do you think it's a super telephoto lens that's worth buying? What's the longest lens you have in your camera bag?

    • @parranoic
      @parranoic 10 місяців тому +1

      Honestly seeing the quality and the mount selection I doubt it

    • @carlosandreviana9448
      @carlosandreviana9448 10 місяців тому

      @@parranoic mount selection??

    • @MASSHOOVY
      @MASSHOOVY 10 місяців тому +3

      100% This looks like a very fun lens to use, but also a pain to use. I have a makinon 300mm mirror lens and i think it will be a similar experience but different form factor!

    • @MichaelSchagen
      @MichaelSchagen 10 місяців тому +2

      I have the Panasonic 70-300. It's three times the price but it is a much more practical lens, much easier to use I think. The price suggests that the ttartisan is a "beginners" lens but I think it actually requires more skill to get good photos with it than a more advanced lens. The Panasonic also looks better when cropping or using multishot-highres mode I would think, so I would guess I can get to 500mm equivalent with similar final quality.

    • @Oyaeboooo
      @Oyaeboooo 10 місяців тому +1

      I believe that the target audience may be landscape photographers who may occasionally need a super telephoto lens for full manual shooting. Maybe astrophotography, but I don't know much about it. As for wildlife, once the customer has more money, he will not be interested in this product at all. And they most likely will, since it makes no sense to buy a lens for these purposes that is much cheaper than the camera itself and not the other way around.
      I have nothing against manual lenses but I believe they need something that sets them apart from competitors other than price. Like if it has even more reach or faster aperture. I would pay twice as much as it would still be cheap. Otherwise it will always be just an affordable worse alternative to 600mm zooms.

  • @Durio_zibethinus
    @Durio_zibethinus 10 місяців тому +9

    Ornithologist with tight budget will love this. Manual focus is no problem.

  • @yervantparnagian5999
    @yervantparnagian5999 10 місяців тому +7

    Excellent review. TTArtisan makes a high quality lens at a very fair price. This 500mm is excellent for someone on a budget who occasionally needs this focal length.

  • @csound55
    @csound55 9 місяців тому +5

    Thanks for the review. Recently received mine and generally impressed with the image quality and build quality considering the low price.

  • @dabateman642
    @dabateman642 10 місяців тому +5

    Excellent review. But I will stick to adapting my Canon 100-400mm ii lens to all cameras. Croped it might be just better than this lens. However if Ttartisan is thinking about telephoto lenses, than a F/8 800mm lens I might be interested in at an affordable price. That may not be too hard for them as a 1.4x teleconverter with this lens would be 700mm f/9. Moving that goal to F/8 800mm might not be too hard, especially if the image quality is good.

  • @ttbirds1082
    @ttbirds1082 10 місяців тому +12

    If they released a more compact version for M43, I would buy it. Seems like a good value.

    • @TheRealRichardWong
      @TheRealRichardWong  10 місяців тому

      Yes agree. a more compact version for APSC/m43 would be great! This lens is a bit too big for m43.

    • @alexandr_ko
      @alexandr_ko 10 місяців тому +1

      compact tele for aps-c... dreams dreams

    • @p4ul.f708
      @p4ul.f708 10 місяців тому

      ​@@TheRealRichardWongDo you happen to know if ttartisans is planning on bringing a tel or super tele sometimes in the future for apsc?

    • @RM-ud2cm
      @RM-ud2cm 10 місяців тому +2

      MFT version would be sharper. and give 1,000mm equivalent focal length. MFT version would not be any smaller though.

    • @trym2121
      @trym2121 10 місяців тому

      ​@@alexandr_kocrop sensor won't have compact tele lens. The reduction isn't really substantial unless they go with the crop factor meaning 500mm FF is 300ish mm APSC or 250mm MFT. Otherwise they will be the same bonkers in length and just reduction of some mm in width. Physics can't be broken

  • @ansonmychannel2235
    @ansonmychannel2235 10 місяців тому +1

    new subscriber from Malaysia here, thanks for your amazing explaining on this new TTArtisan 500mm F6.3 super telephoto lens
    I recently joined the Mirrorless world with my Lumix G95 m43 camera, but after that, I couldn't have more budget to get a nice AF prime lens for it, so I keep studying and watching other PROS' review videos to find out my best alternative and TTArtisan strikes into my brain.
    I currently own 50mm, 17mm, 8mm TT lens, I'm a young bird on using Manual Focus Lens but with the Focus Peaking advantage, I didn't feel any trouble or problem to make a good focus photo with it, very accurate and high success rate.
    TTArtisan really is my money saver on having those affordable and useful lenses. I can't wait to see TTArtisan will release a m43 mount of this or other upcoming super telephoto lens

  • @Vinterloft
    @Vinterloft 4 місяці тому +1

    F11 optimal sharpness kills this for the newly announced Fuji version, because diffraction already kicks in at F11 on the 40MP sensor. Shame they couldn't make it better at F8.

  • @PavlosPapageorgiou
    @PavlosPapageorgiou 10 місяців тому +2

    Pretty good. I have the affordable Canon 600mm f11 and this one seems like an alternative proposition: Brighter and cheaper but big and less usable.

    • @KonicaHexanon
      @KonicaHexanon 10 місяців тому +2

      Less usable for you if you lack the required technique. More useful for others as this lens gives 2x more light compared to Canon's atrocity.

    • @proo5396
      @proo5396 4 місяці тому

      This is exactly my dilemma.
      I would like take pictures of wildlife, but the TTArtisan is large and bulky compared to the rf 600mm it also doesn’t have autofocus unlike the 600mm, but it’s cheaper and has a much better aperture.
      I find it really hard to decide, please tell me if there is something I’m not considering.

  • @dylandigby1776
    @dylandigby1776 10 місяців тому +4

    Insane deal. TTArtisan is getting better and better

    • @dylandigby1776
      @dylandigby1776 10 місяців тому +2

      Looking forward to seeing their camera

    • @Durio_zibethinus
      @Durio_zibethinus 10 місяців тому

      They need rectilinear ultra wide lens and their primes will be a completed set.

  • @hansboon3353
    @hansboon3353 9 місяців тому +1

    Would be great to compare this lens with the Oshiro 500mm f/6.3 preset lens

  • @Chorge1972
    @Chorge1972 10 місяців тому +2

    Would be interesting to see, how it is corrected for stars when using it DeepSky! It’s no APO, so I expect a lot of color fringing due to wavelength shift… But would be awesome, if Someone proofs me wrong!!

  • @mitchellwnorowski6747
    @mitchellwnorowski6747 10 місяців тому +2

    Yes mft please !

  • @davidmeredith2458
    @davidmeredith2458 10 місяців тому

    What's the dimensions the lens?

  • @Peregrinate0626
    @Peregrinate0626 3 місяці тому +1

    Im still torn what would be the area or subject i would like to pursue in photography. I mostly do videos and currently have an a7iv with 35-150 tamron lens. It is both good for photos and videos. But, im searching for a super telephoto zoom. So far, for the past 1 year, i find myself enjoying taking photos of the moon. The 35-150 is not enough for me. Is this TTartisan 500mm a good and enough lens for moon shots and some astro deep space? Im not a professional, its more of a hobby. I can spend a little more for lenses that are videocentric. But for photo, i am on a tight budget. Thanks to anyone who can enlighten me with this.

    • @TheRealRichardWong
      @TheRealRichardWong  3 місяці тому

      Because it is a manual focus lens, this lens is best for shooting static scene so it's great for landscape or moon photo. There aren't too many budget telephoto lens that can give you 500mm+ focal length and reasonably good image quality.

  • @liamfinch4129
    @liamfinch4129 9 місяців тому

    An honest review from a competant photographer - thanks! Comparing this lens with any autofocus high end telephoto lens utterly misses the point and adds nothing to the discussion (pixel peepers shouild leave now!). This unpretentiousTTArtisan 500 manual lens appears to offer acceptable images for very little money - period!

  • @malcolmcog
    @malcolmcog 10 місяців тому

    Will there be an MFT version of this excellent lens !

  • @ballashoes
    @ballashoes 10 місяців тому

    Richard can you please try some astrophotography with this lens

    • @TheRealRichardWong
      @TheRealRichardWong  9 місяців тому

      I don't have any star tracker so i might be a bit hard ?

  • @tauritaal
    @tauritaal 10 місяців тому +1

    What is the weight? Homepage states "Around 307g", seems like a mistake?

    • @tonyferrell3456
      @tonyferrell3456 10 місяців тому

      He says in the video, but I don't remember the exact number. It is closer to 1500g

    • @TheRealRichardWong
      @TheRealRichardWong  10 місяців тому

      that's a mistake, the weight is around 1.5kg / 3.3lb

  • @basujayanta1
    @basujayanta1 10 місяців тому

    Shooting birds in flight with a manual focus lens! Best of luck!😅

    • @davidmeredith2458
      @davidmeredith2458 10 місяців тому +1

      Because no one was photographing birds in flight in the days of manual focus

  • @ericaceous1652
    @ericaceous1652 10 місяців тому +3

    Very intriguing! But not for m43?

    • @TheRealRichardWong
      @TheRealRichardWong  10 місяців тому +2

      No unfortunately not Eric. You cannot adapt it from any of the available mounts either because of flange distance. But even if you can, this lens might be a bit too big and heavy for m43 cameras

    • @shock0413
      @shock0413 10 місяців тому +1

      So sad, I really need the cool gear.

    • @ericaceous1652
      @ericaceous1652 10 місяців тому +1

      ​@@TheRealRichardWonghopes of a budget 1000mm equiv lens dashed 😅 cheers Richard

    • @TheRealRichardWong
      @TheRealRichardWong  10 місяців тому +2

      @@ericaceous1652 haha actually I would like to see a smaller version of this lens for APSC/M43, even at the same price could be very attractive as there aren't many (any?) affordable super-telephoto lenses with acceptable image quality.

    • @trym2121
      @trym2121 10 місяців тому

      IQ is borderline going to soft with FF and you want m43? It will be Vaseline like image. F8 is already diffraction in m43

  • @janjamesramos247
    @janjamesramos247 10 місяців тому

    I think it should be a little bit cheaper since no AF... Will buy this for 250 usd 😅

  • @parazaurolofek
    @parazaurolofek 9 місяців тому

    Too bad you didn't mention weather seals.

    • @TheRealRichardWong
      @TheRealRichardWong  9 місяців тому +1

      I don't think there is any weather seals for this lens.

    • @parazaurolofek
      @parazaurolofek 9 місяців тому +1

      @@TheRealRichardWong Thank you

  • @user-ec8zd8zp4x
    @user-ec8zd8zp4x 10 місяців тому +1

    Too bad. No Fuji X...

    • @TheRealRichardWong
      @TheRealRichardWong  10 місяців тому +1

      I have just confirmed with ttartisan, Fuji X version is coming soon

    • @user-ec8zd8zp4x
      @user-ec8zd8zp4x 10 місяців тому +1

      Thanks for the heads up, Richard!
      This might replace my aging Tokina 400mm f/5.6 MC that I adapt on my Fujis.
      @@TheRealRichardWong

  • @shang-hsienyang1284
    @shang-hsienyang1284 10 місяців тому +5

    I will pay double for autofocus

    • @KonicaHexanon
      @KonicaHexanon 10 місяців тому +1

      Not gonna happen. Autofocus requires a complete interior, exterior and optical redesign.
      Obviously the lens would become much, much bigger, heavier and 5X more expensive.
      Thank TTArtisan for not choosing Canon's route of mediocrity and laziness in favor of shareholders satisfaction.

    • @shang-hsienyang1284
      @shang-hsienyang1284 10 місяців тому

      @@KonicaHexanon I have a Tokina 400mm f/5.6, it has autofocus, sharper than the Tamron 50-400mm at 400mm, weights 990g, and I got it in a garage sale for NT$1000 ≈ US$31. Sure, a new copy would be much more expensive, but it's definitely possible at double the price TTArtisan is asking now.

  • @officialtiimo
    @officialtiimo 10 місяців тому

    Give it AF, weather sealing, OIS, and shave a few hundred grams off and i will buy it for $1200

  • @djxcel23
    @djxcel23 10 місяців тому

    No fuji I have to leave the video