Bishop Michael introduced to House of Lord

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 19 лют 2023
  • The Bishop of Lichfield, the Rt Revd Dr Michael Ipgrave, is introduce to the House of Lords. Read more: www.lichfield.anglican.org/ne...

КОМЕНТАРІ • 7

  • @b-a-boon
    @b-a-boon 7 місяців тому

    another one in

    • @afghanskull7782
      @afghanskull7782 4 місяці тому

      Only 26 at a time😊

    • @b-a-boon
      @b-a-boon 4 місяці тому

      @@afghanskull7782 26 too many for the baboon,,,no lords,,,is no democratcy

  • @kiwihans100
    @kiwihans100 9 місяців тому +2

    The Holy bible that was just held up, at 1 Peter 5:3 states " Neither as being LORDS over God,s heritage but being examples to the flock". Paul aslo said that "Men will arise, from amoung you (the bishops) yourselves " ( Acts 20:30 ) Also Peter was chosen to be one of Jesus's principle apostles, he was just a workingclass fisherman "Unlettered and ordinary" yet this 'Bishop Michael' had to obtain a university degree in Theology to qualify to become a 'bishop'! ( Paul did not include special education skills when he outlined the qualifications for 'bishops' at 1 Tim 3: 1-7 ). How can we equate the humble men who served as 'bishops' ( there were several in each early congregation bye the way!) with the 'bishops' today in both the anglican & catholic churches who wear special robes, sit on a 'throne' have a ring that is kissed, live in a 'palace' have servants and have great authority over a whole 'dioceease' ( a Roman province originally!). This is not the was Jesus Christ wanted his followers to act! Sadly it was fortold!

    • @JohnParks-zc1pn
      @JohnParks-zc1pn 7 місяців тому

      If Peter was "unlettered" (illiterate) how did he write his Epistles?

    • @kiwihans100
      @kiwihans100 7 місяців тому

      @@JohnParks-zc1pn A good question! There was, as in now a difference between a basic education of reading, writing, e.t.c & 'higher education. In Jesus day as mentioned by both Philo of Alexander (20BC) & Josephus (37AD) Jewish youths were given thorough education of basics especially God's Law (Deut 6:7. However the pharisees & sadducees attended 'RABINICAL SCHOOLS' where they were taught the tradition of the talmud e.t.c. It was with this in mind that the religious leaders taunted Peter & John, that they were 'unlettered && ordinary' which basically wasnt true! So we can conclude that Peter COULD read & write, but he didnt need 'special education' in the manmade traditions of men. ( Its very similar today! A person cannot become a priest, bishop, cardinal, pope, arch bishop in either the catholic or anglican church without a degree in 'theology' obtained from a university or special college.) Surely this is the reason for the prevalence of unbiblical philosophy and atheistic reasoning found in the teachings within these churches today!) Paul warned of such...Col 2:8!

  • @milbertg.bongolo5342
    @milbertg.bongolo5342 7 місяців тому

    Times Change Move On 😂