It is definitely a confusing topic but the way you have taught makes it simple and to think in the right direction.....Your gentle voice again made me to hear the complete video. Thank you Sir 👍
Amazingly u made I try easy. I put what u said in my understanding- While analysing argument one should think "can the contrary to this happen". If yes then it is a weak arg. If the substantiation is not given in arg then it is a weak arg Containingng the words may, might will make arg weak. Question the arg - is this based on emotion. If yes it is weak arg
1st time I have seen such trick ,how to solve logical Reasoning ...thank you sir for efforts ...and nicely u have explained it.... I hope that many students will make their dreams in reality... through this step...Thank u ..
@@CareerRideOfficialI have a question that in question number 6 , 20:14 you have said that 1 is strong argument but the argument is not related to the statement then how it became strong argument, please help me with this doubt sir.
Such questions should be banned from asking in exams ? Statement 1 : Yes , these are irrevelent and debatable they can't have any absolute answers , every human mind interpret the things differently unless they are facts Statement 2: No; such kind of questions help in decision making power hence should be made compulsory
These questions are like my wife and mother in law...when i think its a strong argument, its a weak one, when i think its a weak argument, its a strong one...when my wife says no, its mean yes, when her mom says yes, for me its maybe....
lol.. the second line of the first argument clearly says that no state has authority to takes someone's life (which is an instruction from supreme authority even though it is not mentioned but it is a fact)
Question 3, 14.55 why can't the question be taken as 'first statement being an advantage and the second being a disadvantage, this way the answer is C'
@@tanishkagupta386 In that case first India has to adopt something as a trial and error type of equations as a Policies. If it works then it may be an advantage as a country development but if not then a vulnerable situation may arise so Only 2 can follow.
yeah bro , first argument is linked to security , development , art 21 right to internet etc its strong argument and 2 nd was weak as without satellite how development occurs , we not lived in isolated world or other planet
This is my starting for competitive exams and I really clear so many things ...so thank u so much sir...if u provide any classes or course please update me on this ....
For the "basic computer knowledge" question you consider the real life scenario that computer is needed in today's era by yourself but for the next "space mission" question you didn't use you gk that space mission will help in connectivity. So when should we use our GK of real life and when to just follow the statement blindly????
Thanks for writing in, Priscillah. Every feedback from our viewers is very important to us. Please subscribe for more career related videos and stay connected :)
27:59 where the second argument says that, to reduce the crime rate the "specific" capital punishment is necessary but here are they didn't mentioned anything. Because this is not the only way to reduce the crime rate there also some other methods which can be adopted. I think 2nd is weak argument. Let me know.
Thanks fr a wonderful explanation Sir.my reasoning part is cleard ad free frm fear oly bcz of u.great job well done.keep motivating by lots of practice
This makes total sense considering these questions are used to test candidates during job applications. Employers do not want to hire people who base decisions on emotions.
Balajikiran Manne As well as there should be some change in management policies and governance , Closing them downn is a bit too much of a extreme measure.
Sir ji we cant assume your look as your voice , we fell love with you , we are eager to see you ... Our only hope is always you when it comes to logical reasoning .... Stay blessed always .... Love from Kashmir .....🤗
i mean this has to be the most confusing topic. like you said we have to use our common sense. in basic computer question we said it is important for future where as we dicarded space exploration as weak when every article says it is the need of the hour and huanity cannot survive in future without extending our horizon. secondly there is no evidence capital punishments decreases crime, its very common to find countries with higher frequency of capital punishments having higher crime rates eg. afghanistan and also historicaly in medieval and ancient time capital punishments were quite common but still had more crime rate than modern times. im confused how much of logic and common sense do we have to put in. thanks tho youve been very helpful made me a master in conclusion and cause and effect
Sir Q7 the ans should be either 1 or 2 because both the points are strong. The 1st point is also strong because the statement is asking for relax fdi and having fdi is enough to get competition and technology there's no need to give more relaxation because it really effects domestic trader's
Ok Thanks Sir , You cleared my doubts on all logical reasoning (conclusion/assumption/coa/arguement) , this video series is fantastic but sometimes your answers are contradicting to rules
In ques no 10 i think 1st one is strong argument because government have to take responsibility or take care of all the employers who are working in public sector that is why it is government he cant remove employers if it is in private sector then 2nd one will be strong.....
25:51 According to india bix argument 1st is strong Statement: Should Government close down loss-making public sector enterprises? Arguments: 1)No. All employees will lose their jobs, security and earning, what would they do? 2)Yes. In a competitive world the rule is 'survival of the fittest'. Only argument I is strong Only argument II is strong Either I or II is strong Neither I nor II is strong Both I and II are strong Explanation: Closing down public-sector enterprises will definitely throw the engaged persons out of employment. So, argument I holds. Also, closing down is no solution for a loss-making enterprise. Rather, its causes of failure should be studied, analyzed and the essential reforms implemented. Even if this does not work out, the enterprise may be privatized. So, argument II is vague,
Q 9) space missions are important as colonization of space is the going to be a real thing in future .....how is it a weak argument. It stands with country's reputation and technological advancement??????
Thank you soo much for your support and guidance your content turned out to be very helpful for me and i have finally made it to Christ University's ncr campus delhi
Sir you explained questions number 5 that if both statment go in opp direction whether they are strong we should Mark option I or II is strong. I have a problem in my book as follows - STATEMENT : Should a blanket ban be put on hunting of wild animals? ARGUMENT : I. Yes. The natural food chain is disrupted. II. No. It provides a cheap source of protein to the poor. So it means tha ans should either I or II. But the ans given is - both arguments are strong. So sir please explain this question humble request.
Your way of explanation is too good .sir I think no need to read any book for understand concept .just u rs video is enough .just we go through books for the purpose of practice not for concept thanks lot sir
Thanks for the kind words, Ashwini. For online practice of questions, you can follow this link on our website: www.careerride.com/online-aptitude-test.aspx
For Indian Cricket should there be different captains for different formats of game? Argument 1: Yes, different formats need different mindset and planning Argument 2: No, one and the same captain will do Sir what will be the answer for this
Sir, there is a problem in que no 10 in that que argument 1. No, all employes will lose there jobs But it is said that if public sector is loss making then it is said that gov is doing something good for people I toto public sector motto is not to earn profit
Similar question to No. 10 Here in your explanation option 2 is strong but when I gave the test online it says no 2 is week. I'm totally confused. Statement: Should Government close down loss-making public sector enterprises? Arguments: 1. No. All employees will lose their jobs, security and earning, what would they do? 2. Yes. In a competitive world the rule is 'survival of the fittest'. A. Only argument I is strong B. Only argument II is strong C. Either I or II is strong D. Neither I nor II is strong E. Both I and II are strong Answer: Option A Explanation: Closing down public-sector enterprises will definitely throw the engaged persons out of employment. So, argument 1 holds. Also, closing down is no solution for a loss-making enterprise. Rather, its causes of failure should be studied, analyzed and the essential reforms implemented. Even if this does not work out, the enterprise may be privatized. So, argument II is vague.
Q11. even though its not directly saying advantage or disadvantage , both the arguments are doing in opposite directions so why aren't we choosing Either 1 or 2?
Oh my god, completely confusing, for each question you r giving new rules and different different explanation. Confused a lot. Please in this same topic, solve more 20 questions.
thank u sir...your videos on logical reasoning are very helpful...very few content on logical reasoning is available at youtube nd most of it is not that much understandable ...the one you are providing is very apt nd to the points ....thanks for that sir..muje laga ki i should thank you ..soo
In question 6: 1st argument says everyone has a right to live. Indeed. But isn't it exaggeration? I mean adulteration and contamination won't kill everyone right away.
Statement: Should Government close down loss-making public sector enterprises? Arguments: No. All employees will lose their jobs, security and earning, what would they do? Yes. In a competitive world the rule is 'survival of the fittest'. Other site's are showing a different answer in this question
in Qs 6, the first argument isn't even that much related to the given argument, it is indirectly related to it, so why have we considered it to be a strong argument?
Sir, in question number 4, why can we not mark option(c)? Because the coming of the private sector would either bring about development or would lead to exploitation... Hence I thought this was an advantage/disadvantage question and thought option(c) looks correct. Kindly clarify.
the second argument cannot be considered a disadvantage until or unless it is a strong argument. In this case we cannot conclude that private sector will lead to exploitation ( it may or may not ). its not an actual fact or universal truth rather a vague statement so thats why second argument is weak. I hope it helps😇
Sir in question no. 6....it is not the 1st fundamental right in constitution ...although it is a FR under article 21 but in absolute statement it is wrong...please suggest right answer while clearing my doubt. Thanks
3 months ago i have accenture exam i learned from ur videos but i had failed because of less practice , now again i had applied to accenture , i got exam mail this time iam practicing everything let's see what happens
It's like when my mind says yes the ans is no and when it is yes my mind says no😂😂very confusing but still understood thanq...
Yes u are rgt 😂😂😂
Ryt...
😄😄😄😄😄😂😂😂😀😃🙂🙂🙃🙃
confidemce gir gaya
😃😃
These questions are literally playing with our emotions
Same here
True😔
Weak statement..
@@Sunny_67346 bro are you a robot or something 😂😂
@@Sunny_67346 🤣🤣🤣🤣
It is definitely a confusing topic but the way you have taught makes it simple and to think in the right direction.....Your gentle voice again made me to hear the complete video. Thank you Sir 👍
Best trick from me : If you are 100% sure option A is the answer. Then Blindly mark Option B and u will be right. Yu al are welcome. 😂
Who are you bro😂😂😂
Idiot
That's actually work 😂
😂😂
Amazingly u made I try easy. I put what u said in my understanding-
While analysing argument one should think "can the contrary to this happen". If yes then it is a weak arg.
If the substantiation is not given in arg then it is a weak arg
Containingng the words may, might will make arg weak.
Question the arg - is this based on emotion. If yes it is weak arg
1st time I have seen such trick ,how to solve logical Reasoning ...thank you sir for efforts ...and nicely u have explained it.... I hope that many students will make their dreams in reality... through this step...Thank u ..
Thanks for your kind words. They are our dose of motivation :)
@@CareerRideOfficialI have a question that in question number 6 , 20:14 you have said that 1 is strong argument but the argument is not related to the statement then how it became strong argument, please help me with this doubt sir.
Such questions should be banned from asking in exams ?
Statement 1 : Yes , these are irrevelent and debatable they can't have any absolute answers , every human mind interpret the things differently unless they are facts
Statement 2: No; such kind of questions help in decision making power hence should be made compulsory
😂
*IF ONLY ARGUMENT 1 IS STRONG*
ain't no way I'm choosing the other option 😂😭
Either 1 or 2 is strong 😂
Argument 2is strong (educational development)
B
These questions are like my wife and mother in law...when i think its a strong argument, its a weak one, when i think its a weak argument, its a strong one...when my wife says no, its mean yes, when her mom says yes, for me its maybe....
I like the way you teach. It is very clear and clarity. Keep posting more videos on various topics.
You are doing a wonderful job.
Thank you ☺
27:48 Here where and why is coming sympathy or morality?
Each question has own rules
lol.. the second line of the first argument clearly says that no state has authority to takes someone's life (which is an instruction from supreme authority even though it is not mentioned but it is a fact)
@@hrushikeshthorat1433 life is the gift of the god ? Is this factual as well?
Question 3, 14.55 why can't the question be taken as 'first statement being an advantage and the second being a disadvantage, this way the answer is C'
@@tanishkagupta386 yes but statement 2 is not having a certain statement that the fares will increase , that's why it's a weak statement.
@@tanishkagupta386
In that case first India has to adopt something as a trial and error type of equations as a Policies.
If it works then it may be an advantage as a country development but if not then a vulnerable situation may arise so
Only 2 can follow.
i will never get tired thanking you, Sir! ❤
Sir in question no 9-in first argument, country is mentioned so it might be strong and in 2nd argument,every is mention so it might be week argument
Mera bhi same question hai
You have to be an astrologer to find the correct answer in these types of questions
yeah bro , first argument is linked to security , development , art 21 right to internet etc its strong argument
and 2 nd was weak as without satellite how development occurs , we not lived in isolated world or other planet
This is my starting for competitive exams and I really clear so many things ...so thank u so much sir...if u provide any classes or course please update me on this ....
Pick up good question
For the "basic computer knowledge" question you consider the real life scenario that computer is needed in today's era by yourself but for the next "space mission" question you didn't use you gk that space mission will help in connectivity.
So when should we use our GK of real life and when to just follow the statement blindly????
Exceptional, the best video I got on arguments on YT. Thankyou.❤
What an explanation.... fantastic... I'm watching for CGL MAINS
Okay, Now i understand one important concept, when my mind say yes i have to opt no 😂 and vice versa. As i observe this everytime 😁
One of the best things i have seen today! And with a good sense of humor too. Keep up the good work, very good teacher!
Thanks for writing in, Priscillah. Every feedback from our viewers is very important to us. Please subscribe for more career related videos and stay connected :)
Q9 argument 1 should be strong as Spacemissions help not only in generating employment to some extent but also in improvement of technology.
But I think there is no surity that will always succeed so it may be the reason to mark it as weak argument
see if theyhave mentioned it or not dont assume it a half truth
The 2nd argument states everybody which is a part of weak argument . So can we mark 2nd one is a weak argument ?
Correct me plz if I am wrong
Thank you sir for making it clear with a simple but valuable explanation...
27:59 where the second argument says that, to reduce the crime rate the "specific" capital punishment is necessary but here are they didn't mentioned anything.
Because this is not the only way to reduce the crime rate there also some other methods which can be adopted.
I think 2nd is weak argument.
Let me know.
this questions make me question my existence
Thanks fr a wonderful explanation Sir.my reasoning part is cleard ad free frm fear oly bcz of u.great job well done.keep motivating by lots of practice
It's more about to check if we are logical or emotion.
This makes total sense considering these questions are used to test candidates during job applications. Employers do not want to hire people who base decisions on emotions.
26:32 : dont get emotional..you got me there😄🤦♀️
Public sector is not only to earn but to serve public
Balajikiran Manne As well as there should be some change in management policies and governance , Closing them downn is a bit too much of a extreme measure.
Sir ji we cant assume your look as your voice , we fell love with you , we are eager to see you ... Our only hope is always you when it comes to logical reasoning .... Stay blessed always .... Love from Kashmir .....🤗
Successfully answered all questions wrong
😂
😂
😂😂😂
😂😂😂😂
Please updated more video sir
The way u teach is so clear😊
i mean this has to be the most confusing topic.
like you said we have to use our common sense. in basic computer question we said it is important for future where as we dicarded space exploration as weak when every article says it is the need of the hour and huanity cannot survive in future without extending our horizon. secondly there is no evidence capital punishments decreases crime, its very common to find countries with higher frequency of capital punishments having higher crime rates eg. afghanistan and also historicaly in medieval and ancient time capital punishments were quite common but still had more crime rate than modern times. im confused how much of logic and common sense do we have to put in.
thanks tho youve been very helpful made me a master in conclusion and cause and effect
Thanks for this video sir, it helps me a lot to clear my doubts
Sir Q7 the ans should be either 1 or 2 because both the points are strong. The 1st point is also strong because the statement is asking for relax fdi and having fdi is enough to get competition and technology there's no need to give more relaxation because it really effects domestic trader's
No. One 1 is a super weak argument. If you have a slight idea about FDI it is blatant that argument 1 is weak.
Ok Thanks Sir , You cleared my doubts on all logical reasoning (conclusion/assumption/coa/arguement) , this video series is fantastic but sometimes your answers are contradicting to rules
You're welcome, Adarsh! Stay connected :)
Best video for the topic on UA-cam till date 😎
In qsn 4 arg 1 is also a kind of assumption we can't assure it will be more feasible for the public
In ques no 10 i think 1st one is strong argument because government have to take responsibility or take care of all the employers who are working in public sector that is why it is government he cant remove employers if it is in private sector then 2nd one will be strong.....
The topic itself is comfusing , but the tricks are really good. 👌👍
25:51
According to india bix argument 1st is strong
Statement: Should Government close down loss-making public sector enterprises?
Arguments:
1)No. All employees will lose their jobs, security and earning, what would they do?
2)Yes. In a competitive world the rule is 'survival of the fittest'.
Only argument I is strong
Only argument II is strong
Either I or II is strong
Neither I nor II is strong
Both I and II are strong
Explanation:
Closing down public-sector enterprises will definitely throw the engaged persons out of employment. So, argument I holds. Also, closing down is no solution for a loss-making enterprise. Rather, its causes of failure should be studied, analyzed and the essential reforms implemented. Even if this does not work out, the enterprise may be privatized. So, argument II is vague,
Please sir reply??
I like the way you teach naresh sir..I can understand also 🥳
Thanks sir... The way teach is awesome... Plz sir make another video regarding Assertion and Reason type Statement qustns 🙏🙏🙏
Sir! Please make a video on puzzles and pseudocodes. Thank you!
Question.number 6 talk about relaxing FDI, if FDI relaxed then local industry suffer just like IKEA in India
Please paste the link where we need to practice in the career ride website
Practice Questions:
i.) Reasoning: www.careerride.com/pcategory/logical-reasoning-for-job-interviews-and-exams-25.aspx
ii.) Quantitative Aptitude: www.careerride.com/online-aptitude-test.aspx
Q 9) space missions are important as colonization of space is the going to be a real thing in future .....how is it a weak argument. It stands with country's reputation and technological advancement??????
The video is really really helpful for competitive exams👍
Conclusion is just learn the method remaining part is your own as their is no set of regulations for result .
Thank you soo much for your support and guidance your content turned out to be very helpful for me and i have finally made it to Christ University's ncr campus delhi
Sir you explained questions number 5 that if both statment go in opp direction whether they are strong we should Mark option I or II is strong.
I have a problem in my book as follows -
STATEMENT : Should a blanket ban be put on hunting of wild animals?
ARGUMENT :
I. Yes. The natural food chain is disrupted.
II. No. It provides a cheap source of protein to the poor.
So it means tha ans should either I or II.
But the ans given is - both arguments are strong.
So sir please explain this question humble request.
I'm like yes it's right again like no it's wrong
Nice work sir very helpfull. Thank you
Your way of explanation is too good .sir I think no need to read any book for understand concept .just u rs video is enough .just we go through books for the purpose of practice not for concept thanks lot sir
Thanks for the kind words, Ashwini. For online practice of questions, you can follow this link on our website: www.careerride.com/online-aptitude-test.aspx
For Indian Cricket should there be different captains for different formats of game?
Argument 1: Yes, different formats need different mindset and planning
Argument 2: No, one and the same captain will do
Sir what will be the answer for this
only 1 is strong?
Only 1 strong
For the second statement, no logical reason is given
One of the awesome videos went through in this topic on youtube... Thanks for clarifying the doubts.
Sir, there is a problem in que no 10 in that que argument 1. No, all employes will lose there jobs
But it is said that if public sector is loss making then it is said that gov is doing something good for people
I toto public sector motto is not to earn profit
Very enriching.... Thank you!!
Great Teaching style Teacher.
Excellent Sir, Hats off to you
In Q11 When we talk about Capital punishment it means we are talking in terms of money then how it is connected with taking ones life?
I might be wrong.. But I think that in 9th question Arg 1 is strong n Arg 2 is weak
Exactly
Me too
Sir your explanation is really good . Can you please explain how to do either or case questions in syllogism. Please sir
Thank you ...I learned a lot from this video..... thank u once again
superb sir neat and clean explanation
Put starting table of weal and strong argument in front of you then try to attempt question then you get clarity. 😊
Similar question to No. 10
Here in your explanation option 2 is strong but when I gave the test online it says no 2 is week. I'm totally confused.
Statement: Should Government close down loss-making public sector enterprises?
Arguments:
1. No. All employees will lose their jobs, security and earning, what would they do?
2. Yes. In a competitive world the rule is 'survival of the fittest'.
A. Only argument I is strong
B. Only argument II is strong
C. Either I or II is strong
D. Neither I nor II is strong
E. Both I and II are strong
Answer: Option A
Explanation: Closing down public-sector enterprises will definitely throw the engaged persons out of employment. So, argument 1 holds. Also, closing down is no solution for a loss-making enterprise. Rather, its causes of failure should be studied, analyzed and the essential reforms implemented. Even if this does not work out, the enterprise may be privatized. So, argument II is vague.
I also got the same problem
Same doubt
Truly it will soo help ful to everyone sir 👍really great taught sir 🙏👏
Q11. even though its not directly saying advantage or disadvantage , both the arguments are doing in opposite directions so why aren't we choosing Either 1 or 2?
Thank you sir for explaining soo easily..🙏🙏
Best video on UA-cam ❤
You explained very easily ......thank you ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️
If the argument emotionally strong then it's weak ..
The video is very nice. I have liked the video from heart.
Thanks a lot, Paritosh! Glad to know that you found it useful :)
Wow apne English bolna kaise sikha sir 🥰
Super explained bro awesome
Very nicely explained!!❤❤
No words to about say your teaching, sir please put more videos like statement type reasoning & data sufficiency
Thanks, Krishna! We'll get other videos soon. In the meanwhile please take advantage of all other videos :). Good luck.
Sir in Question no. 9 amount spending on space mission is also a development....then why it's is a weak argument
thorough and well explained quite basic breakdown thanks
Me pone una cerveza
Thankyou so much sir for this awesome information in a very simple way🙏🏻
Sir Drawing inference ka bhi video bna dijiye
Disclaimer: All questions are ambigous 🎯
Don't get emotional❌
Can you upload videos on cryptorithms, data interpretation,
Oh my god, completely confusing, for each question you r giving new rules and different different explanation. Confused a lot. Please in this same topic, solve more 20 questions.
Hainaaa sachii
Exactly your are saying right
Can u explain question 11 taking example of railways. Railway always incurs loss in passenger train. But we can't think of stopping it.
thank u sir...your videos on logical reasoning are very helpful...very few content on logical reasoning is available at youtube nd most of it is not that much understandable ...the one you are providing is very apt nd to the points ....thanks for that sir..muje laga ki i should thank you ..soo
your videos are fantastic.keep it up.
Thanks! :)
In question 6: 1st argument says everyone has a right to live. Indeed. But isn't it exaggeration? I mean adulteration and contamination won't kill everyone right away.
When i was answering i was only thinking of that meme 'Kehna Kya Chahte Ho'?
thankyou so much sir. your efforts are appreciated
Statement: Should Government close down loss-making public sector enterprises?
Arguments:
No. All employees will lose their jobs, security and earning, what would they do?
Yes. In a competitive world the rule is 'survival of the fittest'.
Other site's are showing a different answer in this question
Awesome explanation sir👌👌👌👌👌
This topic is a bit tricky 😃 but u explained it well
Excellent explanation, sir!
I am looking for Watson glaser test, is there any other way to practice for it.
In Q.11
In 2nd argument (All) is mentioned so how come it will be strong ?
For each question you are giving ur own ruless
It talks on the serious thing crime that's why strong
All is there but it is not main word ..
in Qs 6, the first argument isn't even that much related to the given argument, it is indirectly related to it, so why have we considered it to be a strong argument?
u have made such a helpful video....tysm❤️
i learnt a lot ....thnx for giving such a video🤗🤗
Glad to hear that :)
@@CareerRideOfficial my pleasure
@@CareerRideOfficial sir can u make more videos in this topic for practice...???
Sir your video helped a lot. But sir, I am still confused between Either and Both. Can you please tell, when to choose either and when to choose both.
Sir, in question number 4, why can we not mark option(c)?
Because the coming of the private sector would either bring about development or would lead to exploitation...
Hence I thought this was an advantage/disadvantage question and thought option(c) looks correct.
Kindly clarify.
the second argument cannot be considered a disadvantage until or unless it is a strong argument. In this case we cannot conclude that private sector will lead to exploitation ( it may or may not ). its not an actual fact or universal truth rather a vague statement so thats why second argument is weak. I hope it helps😇
Sir in question no. 6....it is not the 1st fundamental right in constitution ...although it is a FR under article 21 but in absolute statement it is wrong...please suggest right answer while clearing my doubt.
Thanks
We must assume that the both arguments are true even if the argument was wrong.
3 months ago i have accenture exam i learned from ur videos but i had failed because of less practice , now again i had applied to accenture , i got exam mail this time iam practicing everything let's see what happens
All the best!