Good luck getting the required unanimous consent from the provinces to change the current style of government. You couldn’t get the provinces to agree on the colour of the sky.
@@matthewl1726 How on earth are you supposed to change that? I think even this would require unanimous consent from all ten provinces because this will also be a major change, changing the requirements for major changes in government from unanimous consent from all 10 provinces to 2/3 majority.
@@patarp1350 Move to North Korea with those views buddy. You'll love Kim jong il, living there youll realize the importance of him also, you dope brain.
@@thatguy5801 yes I believe our constitutional monarchy is better than an elected head of state like macron. I also don't like the US system where there is no head of state, rather an elected person who only represents half of its citizen.
There's still about 95% chance that getting rid of the monarchy cannot or will not ever happen to Canada. Because, what you don't know I assume, the monarchy in Canada is highly protected by Constitutional act 1982. This act has set a bar for abolishing the crown so high, that it's now as difficult as nailing jelly to a tree. Even for Prime Minister himself or his government, this is not something within their capability. It requires a very very special amendment to do it, which will be very difficult to achieve, as well as lengthy and costly. Due to this reason, many political theorist have even labelled abolishing the monarchy in Canada as practically impossible.
If Canada wants to become a Republic there'll be no hard feelings from the UK. The problem is that if Britain ever changed the monarchy/abolished it, Canada and the other realms would have to accept the British decision that they didn't even vote for themselves. So time to think about what new system you want.
You do realise that it's pretty much impossible for Canada to get rid of the monarchy? Their own constitution prevents it from happening. And there would be hard feelings from the majority of the UK. The UK's strong relations with Canada comes down to us being part of the same family and sharing the same head of state.
Actually, what you said is false. The British Crown and Canadian Crown are two separate entities, we just have the same person who bears our crowns. If the UK were to ever decide to abolish the monarchy, Elizabeth II would still remain Queen of Canada and Queen of her other independent realms. The funny thing is, legally speaking, it's easier for the UK to abolish the monarchy than it is for Canada.
@@User-qo8rw oh my! Guess I stand corrected 🤔....🤯 Well, whatever happens, Brits like Canadians. They are considered family, and I'm sure there would be no hard feelings whatever choices are made.
@@corvusglaive4804 We Canadians love you Brits too! We also see you as family. No I don't think so either, but I'm quite certain the monarchy is here to stay for many years to come!
Canada being a Constitutional Monarchy, to me is not a big deal. Canada got full sovereignty in 1982. I believe Canada is fine with it's current structure. The Queen doesn't tell Canada what to do, in fact, the Governor General has limited powers as it is. So idea of Canada ditching the Monarchy to me makes little sense. Because Canada has it's full sovereignty.
The monarchy is an important aspect and reflection of this nation's history. After abolishing the Canadian Red Ensign as the flag, The Maple Leaf Forever as the anthem, and retiring the name the Dominion of Canada as well as Dominion Day, the monarchy is all that we have left connecting us to the motherland. The reason this country exists is because of Britain, and we can thank Britain for the fact this land we call Canada is not a part of the United States. The government revolves around the monarchy. It does more good than harm. Liberals have no respect for this nation's history or identity. God Save the Queen and protect the Canadian Crown!
Don't worry mate. They may say whatever they want, but it won't matter at all. There's still about 95% chance that getting rid of the monarchy cannot or will not ever happen to Canada. Because, what they don't know I assume, the monarchy in Canada is highly protected by Constitutional act 1982. This act has set a bar to abolishing the crown so high, that it's now as difficult as nailing jelly to a tree. Even for Prime Minister himself or his government, this is not something within their capability. It requires a very very special amendment to do it, which will be very difficult to achieve, as well as lengthy and costly. Due to this reason, many political theorist have even labelled abolishing the monarchy in Canada as practically impossible.
I think we as Canadians are underestimating the protection that the monarchy offers us as a country against other world super powers and want-to-be super powers in the years to come. Don’t hate on me for saying that but I think it is honestly true.
You may say whatever you want, but it won't matter at all. There's still about 95% chance that getting rid of the monarchy cannot or will not ever happen to Canada. Because, what you don't know I assume, the monarchy in Canada is highly protected by Constitutional act 1982. This act has set a bar for abolishing the crown so high, that it's now as difficult as nailing jelly to a tree. Even for Prime Minister himself or his government, this is not something within their capability. It requires a very very special amendment to do it, which will be very difficult to achieve, as well as lengthy and costly. Due to this reason, many political theorist have even labelled abolishing the monarchy in Canada as practically impossible.
Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II would be a fitting final monarch for Canada. It's time to move on, though we shouldn't adopt the U.S. model where our head of government doubles as our head of state. Head of state should continue to be non-partisan.
Moving away from the monarchy will certainly remove that aspect of non partisan above politics status quo but what model is adopted will show how political it gets
Yes, a republic government for Canada 👏 👍 😀 👌 why be under a monarch 5000 miles away on the other side of the ocean? If Barbados can do it then a big country like Canada can run independently from speeches on the throne in the uk.
People may say whatever they want, but it won't matter at all. There's still and perhaps always be about 95% chance that getting rid of the monarchy cannot or will not ever happen in Canada. Because, the monarchy in Canada is highly protected by Constitutional act 1982. This act has set a bar for abolishing the monarchy so high, that it's now as difficult as nailing jelly to a tree. Even for Prime Minister himself or his government, this is not something within their capability. It requires a very very special amendment to do it, which will be very difficult to achieve, as well as lengthy and costly. Due to this reason, many political theorist have even labelled abolishing the monarchy in Canada as practically impossible.
True "! And be a monachy 40 thousands miles away .too It should have changed in the sixties to show a young vibrant queen ...modern NOT stuck in 19th century.
Sample size = less than 1900 people Sample group = persons with sentiments already of the progressive persuasion Outcome = A totally irrelevant survey with negligible efficacy
It’s time for Canada to move on too. What value does the Monarch add to our country? Essentially The Royal family have evolved into over glorified ribbon cutters for UK; and lifestyle topics for gossip magazines.
@@radcow The UK doesn't do anything for Canada whatsoever beyond the Queen appointing the Governor General to manage things in her name. We still pay lip-service to that vestige of the old empire, but we do everything ourselves.
Leave things alone. I haven't seen evidence of a contemporary government component enough to guide us through such constitutional change. Also remember that most of the worst countries ever have been republics.
I don't recall being surveyed in the question of the separation from the British Monarchy. Who was surveyed, how many, from what Provinces, and by whom exactly?
The Angus Reid Institute asked a variety of questions to 1898 Canadian adults in an online survey held from 26-29 November: 234 from BC, 184 from Alberta, 143 from Sask, 145 from Manitoba, 553 from Ontario, 455 from Quebec and 184 from the Atlantic. 55%-45% support Canada continuing to recognise the Queen "by swearing oaths to her, putting her on currency, and recognizing her as official head of state". 34%-66% oppose Canada continuing to recognise Charles as the new King "by swearing oaths to him, putting himon currency, and recognizing him as official head of state". The headline figure was 25%-52% oppose Canada remaining a constitutional monarchy for generations to come. A plurality support either the Prime Minister (27%) or an elected, US-style head of government (20%) to become head of state, while 18% would support a Canadian governor general, and 8% the Speaker of the House.
@@JSkyGemini If you could believe it, not everyone is asked about every question. In this poll, it was just under 2000 Canadian adults, or about 0.005% of the population
We are fortunate to have the system that we have. Most Canadian's don't fully understand how relevant our monarchy is; due to lack of education on this subject in schools. Studies prove that they are overall a superior system of government... most countries with the best quality of life are monarchies. Let's just keep things as is and educate ourselves on how our parliamentary system works!
your speech is useless, Canada is a monarchy only from a formal point of view, de facto it is already a republic, it would be a matter of formalizing it. Don't you think that the French-Canadians have no desire to submit, even if only formally, to the British crown? Furthermore, I remind you that a correlation is not always an indication of a cause and effect link, republics are often poorer because poor countries are those with an unstable past, which have seen wars and revolutions. In my opinion, you are reversing the cause and effect, monarchies do not make countries more stable, but historically stable countries are the ones that have allowed monarchies to survive. Of course this is not always the case, because the world is more complicated, but this also applies to your vision.
@@slavianalbanovich9025 Explain how Canada is a de facto republic? All of our government institutions are nearly identical to those of the UK... we are a constitutional monarchy there's no question about that. French Canadian's accept that - many may not agree with it, but they accept it (FYI I am French-Canadian). I get where you're coming about how many of republics are poor due to unstable pasts. However, it's still hard to deny a monarchy's effectiveness with 9 out of the 15 countries with the best quality of life are constitutional monarchies. Canada is one of the longest continuing monarchies in the world... starting with the French monarchy, then the British monarchy and now the Canadian monarchy (which is legally distinct from the British crown.. we just have the same person wearing our crowns). The monarchy is a major part of Canadian history. The fact is, if it weren't for it, we would've been annexed by the US many of years ago. I respect your opinion. Although, it is quite unmannerly of you to call one's opinions "useless" simply because you disagree with them... but this is UA-cam after all.
@@fofilatino you are under the impression that money will be saved were she not head of state. If America has shown you anything it's that the amount will go up. But let's ignore that shall we?
@@Whoami691 the US president, not only from a richer country, has more responsibilities than the Monarch. The current King Charles is only Head of State, while the US president is head of government aswell
@@Britishdarnlib which is why he will never have the same level of approval as a monarch and will always cost more. But by all means, keep missing the point.
In software parlance, we do a _fork_ Just do the same thing with Canadian Law. Have been a fan/supporter of the Queen all my life but I honestly think that when her realm of rule ends, Canada should become a republic. In the end it's the only way really to close the chapter on colonial rule. As long as it strives also to resolve aboriginal issues in a way that's impossible in the current structure of government.
@@patarp1350 it’s 2021, not 1621 _monarchies are archaic_ and *anachronistic* Humans touch the cosmos, we need to move past “divinely ordained bloodline rulership”
What was that quote again something like “America will become a republic if they can keep it” the queen will go and the no else in the royal family can be trusted after her we as a nation need to start talking about this
You may say whatever you want, but it won't matter at all. There's still about 95% chance that getting rid of the monarchy cannot or will not ever happen to Canada. Because, what you don't know I assume, the monarchy in Canada is highly protected by Constitutional act 1982. This act has set a bar for abolishing the crown so high, that it's now as difficult as nailing jelly to a tree. Even for Prime Minister himself or his government, this is not something within their capability. It requires a very very special amendment to do it, which will be very difficult to achieve, as well as lengthy and costly. Due to this reason, many political theorist have even labelled abolishing the monarchy in Canada as practically impossible.
I don't have a problem with Canada remaining a Constitutional Monarchy. But if a significant majority wants us to be a republic, I am fine with that too. I would rather that we got proportional representation first.
It's a matter of national identity and pride to have our own head of state, and not rely on Britain to give us one--least of all from a single, caucasian, Protestant-only family. We need to look at options before the queen dies, so she has the distinction of being the last British monarch over Canada. We’ve amended the Constitution before, and we can do it again. This is something most Canadians already support, and an opportunity to bring Quebec into the fold (support for a republic is at 72% there). Unanimity doesn’t mean we must all agree. It means 11 legislatures need to agree by just 50% + 1. And I suspect it will be much higher than that.
She's the queen of Canada. Britain doesn't have a figure head over Canada. The Queen of England isn't the Queen of Canada and vice versa. She just assumes the responsibility of both crowns, Canada can even form its own crown with its own leader separate from the English crown. Also the government and even the provinces acknowledge that the viability of Canada becoming a republic is next to none. Barbados isn't Canada, our political stability as a constitutional monarchy keeps investors and businesses running that and the added bonus that the westminster system is almost 1000 years old and proven resilient
You may say whatever you want, but it won't matter at all. There's still about 95% chance that getting rid of the monarchy cannot or will not ever happen to Canada. Because, what you don't know I assume, the monarchy in Canada is highly protected by Constitutional act 1982. This act has set a bar to abolishing the crown so high, that it's now as difficult as nailing jelly to a tree. Even for Prime Minister himself or his government, this is not something within their capability. It requires a very very special amendment to do it, which will be very difficult to achieve, as well as lengthy and costly. Due to this reason, many political theorist have even labelled abolishing the monarchy in Canada as practically impossible.
Honestly, I feel neutral about this. I don't mind Canada having close ties with the UK (which could in theory make it easier for Canadians to do business with the UK), but I completely understand the reason why we should remove the monarchy. We don't do or owe anything for the royal family at all and they don't run our government.
Huh? It was our kings who beat the French and Americans and are the reason your people are even a thing. Had it not been for the monarchy you would all be speaking French. Getting rid of the monarchy will ruin your relations with the UK and Commonwealth and then you'll be stuck with yankee land.
Even if the support for abolishing the monarchy is 100% among random people, it wont matter. Because, what many people don't know I assume, the monarchy in Canada is highly protected by Constitutional act 1982. This act has set a bar for abolishing the monarchy so high, that it's now as difficult as nailing jelly to a tree. Even for Prime Minister himself or his government, this is not something within their capability. It requires a very very special amendment to do it, which will be very difficult to achieve, as well as lengthy and costly. Due to this reason, many political theorist have even labelled abolishing the monarchy in Canada as simply impossible.
@@raqibzaman3199 Really? I thought we could just get rid of the Monarchy anytime we want? It's not really that big of deal, and it's always nice to keep a bit of our history.
The constitutional monarchy WORKS... No way do I want to scrap that for something like the U.S. has which obviously is not working well for them. Besides, then instead of having a non-political Head of State that is separate from any political party and who represented the nation itself and had great continuity (which is a wonderful thing during turbulent times when people need an anchor that they know will not float away with the tide)... instead we'd open ourselves up to having a head of state that is from a political party and will change with the tide of office...no continuity... .NO THANKS.
As long as the referendum starts, the question will be whether or not you are confident with the current Canadian institutional and constitutional system without talking about monarchy and republicanism.
That's a great idea, no one head of state. A senate that decides on behalf of Canadians as it should be now. They work for us, not the other way around.
Why are you guys still a constitutional monarchy anyway?? Pretty surprised by that alone. Thought Canada was a republic. You pretty function like one. 🤔🤔
@@Shazzyhtown we are a parliamentary system. Like most of these types of government its about compromises. Coaltions are formed between parties to move certain aspects of policies forward.
@@Shazzyhtown You can Google can’t you? Parliamentary Democracy is an easy search term. The disdain for our system is clear in asking how a G7 nation like ours gets anything done. Nobody should call you a dodo brain but perhaps save the disdain if you don’t want to incite a negative response.
The question is not if Canada wants to become a republic or not, the question is rather do we have the appetite to open up lingering questions that comes with the process of amending the constitution.
The process of removing the Monarchy does not have to take four to five generations as this CBC piece suggests. The process is as simple as one referendum question. Are you in favour of replacing the current Monarchy with Canada's own independent form of Democratically Elected Government where the people of Canada elect a Prime Minister as Canada's Head of State in Parliamentary Democracy form of Government?
I am sure the supreme court of Canada will rule that doing so violates the BNA treaty ugh !! why Canada is subject to a treaty between two foreign nations is beyond me
You may say whatever you want, but it won't matter at all. There's still about 95% chance that getting rid of the monarchy cannot or will not ever happen to Canada. Because, what you don't know I assume, the monarchy in Canada is highly protected by Constitutional act 1982. This act has set a bar to abolishing the crown so high, that it's now as difficult as nailing jelly to a tree. Even for Prime Minister himself or his government, this is not something within their capability. It requires a very very special amendment to do it, which will be very difficult to achieve, as well as lengthy and costly. Due to this reason, many political theorist have even labelled abolishing the monarchy in Canada as practically impossible.
I feel no particular emotional loyalty to the British crown but the world is what it is and more friends are always better than fewer. If the monarch had any real power here I would feel differently but she doesn't so I'm happy to keep a close alliance alive and well.
It's a truly sad day with the Queen passing away and now is time to end our relationship with the English monarchy. Queen Elizabeth II gave us a lifetime of service, her son is an embarrassment.
Even if the support is 100% among the normal people, it wont matter. There's still about 95% chance that getting rid of the monarchy cannot or will not ever happen to Canada. Because, what they don't know I assume, the monarchy in Canada is highly protected by Constitutional act 1982. This act has set a bar for abolishing the monarchy so high, that it's now as difficult as nailing jelly to a tree. Even for Prime Minister himself or his government, this is not something within their capability. It requires a very very special amendment to do it, which will be very difficult to achieve, as well as lengthy and costly. Due to this reason, many political theorist have even labelled abolishing the monarchy in Canada as practically impossible.
Even then opinions from the random public won't matter at all. There's still and always be about 95% chance that getting rid of the monarchy cannot or will not ever happen to Canada. Because, what you don't know I assume, the monarchy in Canada is highly protected by Constitutional act 1982. This act has set a bar for abolishing the crown so high, that it's now as difficult as nailing jelly to a tree. Even for Prime Minister himself or his government, this is not something within their capability. It requires a very very special amendment to do it, which will be very difficult to achieve, as well as lengthy and costly. Due to this reason, many political theorist have even labelled abolishing the monarchy in Canada as practically impossible.
I agree, but to be fair I am a Quebecer who adores being part of the CommonWealth AND to my delight, I've been seeing both Quebec and Canada flags half mast all over the place, in respect of our Queen's passing and service. Quebec isn't usually so cooperative and esp. in regard to anything English. Speaks volumes.
I'm all for the British monarchy to stay cause they've been with us since queen Elizabeth became the Queen and she has done her duty as a good queen like she promised all them many years ago! I still remember her words and they still ring louder than ever from the day she spoke from her speech. And she has struggled long and hard to keep her families together and the day she lost her husband that was ultimately the saddest day for her as well as us Canadian's. She is the bridge to our rivers and to lose her is not a happy option!! We love our Queen, I just wish her grandson's would show her a lot more respect I know that would really brighten her heart up!!! She realy does have a hard job it's not easy for her and the way the world is right now it's not going to be anymore easier for her.She has a lot of decisions to make for her people as well as her and other countries!! So I totally understand and am sympathetic to her job as a queen. Plus she's very giving to people who she thinks deserve it!!! Like, sir Shaun Connery!!! That's a good woman in my books!!! Q.E. #1 royal woman in the world & to Canada! 👸🍁🇨🇦🍁🕊️💐🌹🌲🍀🌄🌈🌟⭐🥇👑👒💎🛡️
You may say whatever you want, but it won't matter at all. There's still about 95% chance that getting rid of the monarchy cannot or will not ever happen to Canada. Because, what you don't know I assume, the monarchy in Canada is highly protected by Constitutional act 1982. This act has set a bar to abolishing the crown so high, that it's now as difficult as nailing jelly to a tree. Even for Prime Minister himself or his government, this is not something within their capability. It requires a very very special amendment to do it, which will be very difficult to achieve, as well as lengthy and costly. Due to this reason, many political theorist have even labelled abolishing the monarchy in Canada as practically impossible.
@@Etaoinshrdlu69 nobody is asking to change the name of the country But, what you think of when you hear the word “republic” vs what the form of government actually is are _completely unrelated_
UK after the US is still the most well connected country, they also have one of the strongest militaries in the world, Canada cannot keep Canada safe, and we shouldn't rely on the US for everything. It connects Canada more to the world and protects us. On the other hand it would be nice to have our full independence
Jey that’s retarted one because Canada should rely on Canada. The reason why Canada got independence of some sort was because Britain would put America before Canada, and it still does. So Canada goes to the British then to the US then back to Britain when America is the superpower. Britain is just gonna side with America as usual
@@savagesurpreme7856 Huh? Britain would always side with Canada. I think you forget that our head of state is Queen Elizabeth II. Our countries are connected and we will always choose Canada. Canada needs the UK and the Commonwealth. Relying on the US is a dangerous game.
I agree we are stronger united than separated. What a strange time we live in. People would be wise to focus more on the politics of division and how our governments spend and waste our money; poor services, health systems collapsing.
The difficulty comes after deciding to become a republic. How to determine what the process should be to replace the Governor General. Australia decided to remain tied to the UK as they couldn’t agree on an alternative all could agree to. Personally though originally from the UK it’s time to become a republic.
@@biggibbs4678 that's how a lot of countries do it with a weak ceremonial president and a Prime minister that actually leads the government/parliament.
Just replace GG with a "President" and it is usually a ceremonial role although some countries like Mauritius let the President assent to legislation enacted. PM still holds the power
I didn't see any poll and I would have voted in favour of remaining Common Wealth hands up. So this poll asked who exactly? More political leanings perhaps. If people really want to complain about $ maybe start looking at how our governments are spending or should I say wasting our money and getting rich for feeding division vs unity politics. The cost of elections, and all the hidden stuff. Look at our health system across the country. Shameful. the Monarchy stokes unity and are great ambassadors for such. Make the poll available to all and you will likely see different results, more in favour.
Random people can say whatever they want, but it won't matter at all. There's still about 95% chance that getting rid of the monarchy cannot or will not ever happen to Canada. Because, what they don't know I assume, the monarchy in Canada is highly protected by Constitutional act 1982. This act has set a bar for abolishing the monarchy so high, that it's now as difficult as nailing jelly to a tree. Even for Prime Minister himself or his government, this is not something within their capability. It requires a very very special amendment to do it, which will be very difficult to achieve, as well as lengthy and costly. Due to this reason, many political theorist have even labelled abolishing the monarchy in Canada as practically impossible.
G.G.Jean’s acceptance of Harpers political ploy to prorogue parliament to avoid parliamentary will is when I switched from pro const. monarchy to pro-republic
Hi everyone well I'm not from Canada but from France and in my opinion I think Canada should remove Queen Elizabeth II because she doesn't have any political power.
You may say whatever you want, but it won't matter at all. There's still about 95% chance that getting rid of the monarchy cannot or will not ever happen to Canada. Because, what you don't know I assume, the monarchy in Canada is highly protected by Constitutional act 1982. This act has set a bar to abolishing the crown so high, that it's now as difficult as nailing jelly to a tree. Even for Prime Minister himself or his government, this is not something within their capability. It requires a very very special amendment to do it, which will be very difficult to achieve, as well as lengthy and costly. Due to this reason, many political theorist have even labelled abolishing the monarchy in Canada as simply impossible.
When enough people decide that this relic from the past needs to be removed from our modern society, we will suddenly find "impossible" actually just means inconvenient for those in charge (especially the un-elected ones)
My background is MacKenzie, Stewart and Spencer, so I have roots that stretch across the sea to Scotland, England, Ireland, and France. Our Stewart roots in Canada will celebrate our 95th family reunion in 2022. I look forward to seeing Princess Diana Spencer's son Prince William assuming the throne and reigning in a more modernized British Empire including Canada. After all our Parliamentary system of democratic governance is rooted in the British government system. We have enjoyed amiable relations with the British Monarchy to date. Let's move forward with the New Young Prince William.
@@Ocean-yl4do Our reunion is in Ontario, but we are spread out worldwide! I would rather have a sovereign Dominion than a Republic. I do believe we are fortunate to have our alliance with the Monarchy that accords strength to each partner.
That support for republicanism was a huge humiliation for the Canadian federation and also for incoming King George VII (Prince Charles) and King William V (Prince William) in general!
What many people don't know I assume, monarchy in Canada is highly protected by Constitutional act 1982. This act has set a bar for abolishing the monarchy, so high and now it's as difficult as nailing jelly to a tree. Even Prime Minister himself and his government cannot do it, it's not something within their capability. It requires a very very special amendment to do it, which is a difficult to achieve, as well as lengthy and costly. So, many political theorist have even labelled it as practically impossible.
Its not a superficial issue. The split and division of powers Is one of the core reasons why Canada works so well as a country. Republics tend to be messier and poorer than constitutional monarchies as I look around the world
@@dereksmith6693 how would that be bad for you. And i f you think that the only diffrence between Candians and Americans is the Queen, then you don't know Canadians at all.
India throwed the monarchy out window on the first chance they got! way to do with heredity system and we are proud of some of the presidents who rose from absolute poverty to highest office of the country
@@sedekiman yes, India just displaced UK to become 5th largest economy but UK took 200 years to pull India from richest country to poster child of poverty.
Good luck getting the required unanimous consent from the provinces to change the current style of government. You couldn’t get the provinces to agree on the colour of the sky.
We should put the question to them about the color of the sky and see what happens lol
What sky? I've been quarantined for so long now that I've forgotten what the outdoors looks like.
We need to break the country up into 2-3 smaller countries. That would be the way to start.
yeah we have to change unanimous consent to 3/4 majority.
@@matthewl1726 How on earth are you supposed to change that? I think even this would require unanimous consent from all ten provinces because this will also be a major change, changing the requirements for major changes in government from unanimous consent from all 10 provinces to 2/3 majority.
I am going to be honest we have no need to be loyal to some monarch on the other side of the world who has no power in our land
@@patarp1350 Move to North Korea with those views buddy. You'll love Kim jong il, living there youll realize the importance of him also, you dope brain.
@@thatguy5801 lol! North korea is a republican. You like to live in republican state you should go there. Worst form of government in history.
@@maple-leafs13 Do you mean a Republic? Like what France is, and technically the United States. Okay....okay. I must just be uneducated.
@@thatguy5801 i didn't infer in any way that you're uneducated. I was just dissagreeing with your viewpoints.
@@thatguy5801 yes I believe our constitutional monarchy is better than an elected head of state like macron. I also don't like the US system where there is no head of state, rather an elected person who only represents half of its citizen.
Ditch the Monarchy, I'm not a fan of power by birthright to begin with. I don't bend the knee to nobody.
Yes you do
There's still about 95% chance that getting rid of the monarchy cannot or will not ever happen to Canada. Because, what you don't know I assume, the monarchy in Canada is highly protected by Constitutional act 1982. This act has set a bar for abolishing the crown so high, that it's now as difficult as nailing jelly to a tree. Even for Prime Minister himself or his government, this is not something within their capability. It requires a very very special amendment to do it, which will be very difficult to achieve, as well as lengthy and costly. Due to this reason, many political theorist have even labelled abolishing the monarchy in Canada as practically impossible.
If Canada wants to become a Republic there'll be no hard feelings from the UK. The problem is that if Britain ever changed the monarchy/abolished it, Canada and the other realms would have to accept the British decision that they didn't even vote for themselves. So time to think about what new system you want.
You do realise that it's pretty much impossible for Canada to get rid of the monarchy? Their own constitution prevents it from happening. And there would be hard feelings from the majority of the UK. The UK's strong relations with Canada comes down to us being part of the same family and sharing the same head of state.
Actually, what you said is false. The British Crown and Canadian Crown are two separate entities, we just have the same person who bears our crowns. If the UK were to ever decide to abolish the monarchy, Elizabeth II would still remain Queen of Canada and Queen of her other independent realms. The funny thing is, legally speaking, it's easier for the UK to abolish the monarchy than it is for Canada.
@@User-qo8rw oh my! Guess I stand corrected 🤔....🤯
Well, whatever happens, Brits like Canadians. They are considered family, and I'm sure there would be no hard feelings whatever choices are made.
@@corvusglaive4804 We Canadians love you Brits too! We also see you as family. No I don't think so either, but I'm quite certain the monarchy is here to stay for many years to come!
You are wrong. Canada is a separate monarchy.
no more royals, lets gooooooo
Canada being a Constitutional Monarchy, to me is not a big deal. Canada got full sovereignty in 1982. I believe Canada is fine with it's current structure. The Queen doesn't tell Canada what to do, in fact, the Governor General has limited powers as it is. So idea of Canada ditching the Monarchy to me makes little sense. Because Canada has it's full sovereignty.
Canada pay millions every year to this parasites...enough!
you made more of an argument to leave the Monarchy than to stay with it.
@@claudebujold4959 exactly how? What millions are we spending?
It's a vestige. It doesn't harm anything, but it doesn't help anything either. Just tradition for tradition's sake.
The office of GG costs only 1.55 per taxpayer and it's not parties for the GG. It's to engage with Canadians.
We're well overdue to cut ties with the Monarch.
Never say never
@@masyaf897 I like your optimism
The monarchy is an important aspect and reflection of this nation's history. After abolishing the Canadian Red Ensign as the flag, The Maple Leaf Forever as the anthem, and retiring the name the Dominion of Canada as well as Dominion Day, the monarchy is all that we have left connecting us to the motherland. The reason this country exists is because of Britain, and we can thank Britain for the fact this land we call Canada is not a part of the United States. The government revolves around the monarchy. It does more good than harm. Liberals have no respect for this nation's history or identity. God Save the Queen and protect the Canadian Crown!
Don't worry mate. They may say whatever they want, but it won't matter at all. There's still about 95% chance that getting rid of the monarchy cannot or will not ever happen to Canada. Because, what they don't know I assume, the monarchy in Canada is highly protected by Constitutional act 1982. This act has set a bar to abolishing the crown so high, that it's now as difficult as nailing jelly to a tree. Even for Prime Minister himself or his government, this is not something within their capability. It requires a very very special amendment to do it, which will be very difficult to achieve, as well as lengthy and costly. Due to this reason, many political theorist have even labelled abolishing the monarchy in Canada as practically impossible.
Agreed, God save the Queen and the future kings/queens of this country 🇬🇧
Agreed. Liberals destroyed history. God save the Queen and king in the future
God does not save satanists.
Canada remains a relatively safe country to live in, so I'm good. No need to fix what isn't broken.
exactly
Right on.
Canada being a developed country is not an independent country, strange!!!!!
It is. Look up "personal union".
It is fully independent. The division of power is crucial, important but only symbolic
Thank you. It was always bizarre. Just flick the Queen out and we can leave that past behind
I think we as Canadians are underestimating the protection that the monarchy offers us as a country against other world super powers and want-to-be super powers in the years to come. Don’t hate on me for saying that but I think it is honestly true.
😂😂😂😂😂
Canada is part of NATO, has allies, and would continue to have the UK as an ally even without the queen of England being our head of state
Haha! UK can barely act independently without direction or guidance from USA.
Totally agree.
End the Monarchy!
You may say whatever you want, but it won't matter at all. There's still about 95% chance that getting rid of the monarchy cannot or will not ever happen to Canada. Because, what you don't know I assume, the monarchy in Canada is highly protected by Constitutional act 1982. This act has set a bar for abolishing the crown so high, that it's now as difficult as nailing jelly to a tree. Even for Prime Minister himself or his government, this is not something within their capability. It requires a very very special amendment to do it, which will be very difficult to achieve, as well as lengthy and costly. Due to this reason, many political theorist have even labelled abolishing the monarchy in Canada as practically impossible.
Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II would be a fitting final monarch for Canada. It's time to move on, though we shouldn't adopt the U.S. model where our head of government doubles as our head of state. Head of state should continue to be non-partisan.
Moving away from the monarchy will certainly remove that aspect of non partisan above politics status quo but what model is adopted will show how political it gets
@@dionzeka Agreed. This is one of the issues that'll have to be tackled/addressed.
@@dionzeka I hate that I agree with you
I will choose being a republic over a monarchy, every single time. Keep that antique system witin the British borders.
Yes, a republic government for Canada 👏 👍 😀 👌 why be under a monarch 5000 miles away on the other side of the ocean? If Barbados can do it then a big country like Canada can run independently from speeches on the throne in the uk.
Im sure the military agrees with this. NOT.
People may say whatever they want, but it won't matter at all. There's still and perhaps always be about 95% chance that getting rid of the monarchy cannot or will not ever happen in Canada. Because, the monarchy in Canada is highly protected by Constitutional act 1982. This act has set a bar for abolishing the monarchy so high, that it's now as difficult as nailing jelly to a tree. Even for Prime Minister himself or his government, this is not something within their capability. It requires a very very special amendment to do it, which will be very difficult to achieve, as well as lengthy and costly. Due to this reason, many political theorist have even labelled abolishing the monarchy in Canada as practically impossible.
True "! And be a monachy 40 thousands miles away .too It should have changed in the sixties to show a young vibrant queen ...modern NOT stuck in 19th century.
Why would the military care about some monarchs?
Sample size = less than 1900 people
Sample group = persons with sentiments already of the progressive persuasion
Outcome = A totally irrelevant survey with negligible efficacy
It’s time for Canada to move on too. What value does the Monarch add to our country?
Essentially The Royal family have evolved into over glorified ribbon cutters for UK; and lifestyle topics for gossip magazines.
You'd be surprised what uk does for Canada
@@radcow The UK doesn't do anything for Canada whatsoever beyond the Queen appointing the Governor General to manage things in her name. We still pay lip-service to that vestige of the old empire, but we do everything ourselves.
@@radcow
Go on, I'm sure you have a whole list of things to cite as examples.
True
Leave things alone. I haven't seen evidence of a contemporary government component enough to guide us through such constitutional change.
Also remember that most of the worst countries ever have been republics.
Dictatorships are good, just not other ones right?
Look at the duffer below you who was voted in. What an embarrassment.
I don't recall being surveyed in the question of the separation from the British Monarchy. Who was surveyed, how many, from what Provinces, and by whom exactly?
Nobody asked me or anyone I know.
The Angus Reid Institute asked a variety of questions to 1898 Canadian adults in an online survey held from 26-29 November: 234 from BC, 184 from Alberta, 143 from Sask, 145 from Manitoba, 553 from Ontario, 455 from Quebec and 184 from the Atlantic.
55%-45% support Canada continuing to recognise the Queen "by swearing oaths to her, putting her on currency, and recognizing her as official head of state".
34%-66% oppose Canada continuing to recognise Charles as the new King "by swearing oaths to him, putting himon currency, and recognizing him as official head of state".
The headline figure was 25%-52% oppose Canada remaining a constitutional monarchy for generations to come. A plurality support either the Prime Minister (27%) or an elected, US-style head of government (20%) to become head of state, while 18% would support a Canadian governor general, and 8% the Speaker of the House.
0:39 - there are the answers to your question
@@patarp1350 did you just say “the benefit of a monarchy is democracy”???
Sure you cannot be that abysmally ignorant
@@JSkyGemini If you could believe it, not everyone is asked about every question. In this poll, it was just under 2000 Canadian adults, or about 0.005% of the population
We are fortunate to have the system that we have. Most Canadian's don't fully understand how relevant our monarchy is; due to lack of education on this subject in schools. Studies prove that they are overall a superior system of government... most countries with the best quality of life are monarchies. Let's just keep things as is and educate ourselves on how our parliamentary system works!
your speech is useless, Canada is a monarchy only from a formal point of view, de facto it is already a republic, it would be a matter of formalizing it. Don't you think that the French-Canadians have no desire to submit, even if only formally, to the British crown?
Furthermore, I remind you that a correlation is not always an indication of a cause and effect link, republics are often poorer because poor countries are those with an unstable past, which have seen wars and revolutions. In my opinion, you are reversing the cause and effect, monarchies do not make countries more stable, but historically stable countries are the ones that have allowed monarchies to survive. Of course this is not always the case, because the world is more complicated, but this also applies to your vision.
@@slavianalbanovich9025 Explain how Canada is a de facto republic? All of our government institutions are nearly identical to those of the UK... we are a constitutional monarchy there's no question about that. French Canadian's accept that - many may not agree with it, but they accept it (FYI I am French-Canadian).
I get where you're coming about how many of republics are poor due to unstable pasts. However, it's still hard to deny a monarchy's effectiveness with 9 out of the 15 countries with the best quality of life are constitutional monarchies. Canada is one of the longest continuing monarchies in the world... starting with the French monarchy, then the British monarchy and now the Canadian monarchy (which is legally distinct from the British crown.. we just have the same person wearing our crowns). The monarchy is a major part of Canadian history. The fact is, if it weren't for it, we would've been annexed by the US many of years ago.
I respect your opinion. Although, it is quite unmannerly of you to call one's opinions "useless" simply because you disagree with them... but this is UA-cam after all.
@@slavianalbanovich9025 Roll on CANZUK
she's not mentioning the cost to canada, its costing us around $50 + million dollars annually
And a president wouldn't?
@@Whoami691 .. and your point is...
@@fofilatino you are under the impression that money will be saved were she not head of state. If America has shown you anything it's that the amount will go up.
But let's ignore that shall we?
@@Whoami691 the US president, not only from a richer country, has more responsibilities than the Monarch. The current King Charles is only Head of State, while the US president is head of government aswell
@@Britishdarnlib which is why he will never have the same level of approval as a monarch and will always cost more.
But by all means, keep missing the point.
I say keep it for now. Wait until Queen Elizabeth passes, then let's review it.
Compare what Britain (England) has done for us compared to what we have done (and bled) for them.
Literally wouldn’t exist without them, not sure that qualifies. They also defended us in 1812, otherwise we would all be American now!!
@@benbanks8778 We defended ourselves.
Canadians detest the British,I,ve been told by loads of Canadians.Canadians should be the 51state.
@@andrewbarrett42 Ugh no America is way way worse.
@@otakunthevegan4206The Brits came to Canadas defence too
In software parlance, we do a _fork_
Just do the same thing with Canadian Law.
Have been a fan/supporter of the Queen all my life but I honestly think that when her realm of rule ends, Canada should become a republic. In the end it's the only way really to close the chapter on colonial rule. As long as it strives also to resolve aboriginal issues in a way that's impossible in the current structure of government.
@@patarp1350 it’s 2021, not 1621
_monarchies are archaic_ and *anachronistic*
Humans touch the cosmos, we need to move past “divinely ordained bloodline rulership”
impossible you cant do both without breaking up the government as the treaties are enshrined into the constitution.
What was that quote again something like “America will become a republic if they can keep it” the queen will go and the no else in the royal family can be trusted after her we as a nation need to start talking about this
one day we will have a referendum to ditch these leeches ...what purpose do these 'royals' actually serve ?
You didn’t watch the video then?
Count me as part of the 52%
You may say whatever you want, but it won't matter at all. There's still about 95% chance that getting rid of the monarchy cannot or will not ever happen to Canada. Because, what you don't know I assume, the monarchy in Canada is highly protected by Constitutional act 1982. This act has set a bar for abolishing the crown so high, that it's now as difficult as nailing jelly to a tree. Even for Prime Minister himself or his government, this is not something within their capability. It requires a very very special amendment to do it, which will be very difficult to achieve, as well as lengthy and costly. Due to this reason, many political theorist have even labelled abolishing the monarchy in Canada as practically impossible.
Peoples republic of Canada sounds about right these days
Loyal Canada began and Loyal she will remain.
I don't have a problem with Canada remaining a Constitutional Monarchy. But if a significant majority wants us to be a republic, I am fine with that too.
I would rather that we got proportional representation first.
It's a matter of national identity and pride to have our own head of state, and not rely on Britain to give us one--least of all from a single, caucasian, Protestant-only family. We need to look at options before the queen dies, so she has the distinction of being the last British monarch over Canada. We’ve amended the Constitution before, and we can do it again. This is something most Canadians already support, and an opportunity to bring Quebec into the fold (support for a republic is at 72% there). Unanimity doesn’t mean we must all agree. It means 11 legislatures need to agree by just 50% + 1. And I suspect it will be much higher than that.
She's the queen of Canada. Britain doesn't have a figure head over Canada. The Queen of England isn't the Queen of Canada and vice versa. She just assumes the responsibility of both crowns, Canada can even form its own crown with its own leader separate from the English crown. Also the government and even the provinces acknowledge that the viability of Canada becoming a republic is next to none. Barbados isn't Canada, our political stability as a constitutional monarchy keeps investors and businesses running that and the added bonus that the westminster system is almost 1000 years old and proven resilient
No, I don't think we should. She doesn't do anything for us anyway.
It's the time for Canada as well.
You may say whatever you want, but it won't matter at all. There's still about 95% chance that getting rid of the monarchy cannot or will not ever happen to Canada. Because, what you don't know I assume, the monarchy in Canada is highly protected by Constitutional act 1982. This act has set a bar to abolishing the crown so high, that it's now as difficult as nailing jelly to a tree. Even for Prime Minister himself or his government, this is not something within their capability. It requires a very very special amendment to do it, which will be very difficult to achieve, as well as lengthy and costly. Due to this reason, many political theorist have even labelled abolishing the monarchy in Canada as practically impossible.
@@raqibzaman3199 oh thank you for your information. I am not Canadian and didn't know that.
Most Canadians only think that the monarchy is a reflection of the past and don’t take into consideration the many benefits it brings to our country.
Like
Honestly, I feel neutral about this. I don't mind Canada having close ties with the UK (which could in theory make it easier for Canadians to do business with the UK), but I completely understand the reason why we should remove the monarchy. We don't do or owe anything for the royal family at all and they don't run our government.
You are highly misinformed on that.
Huh? It was our kings who beat the French and Americans and are the reason your people are even a thing. Had it not been for the monarchy you would all be speaking French. Getting rid of the monarchy will ruin your relations with the UK and Commonwealth and then you'll be stuck with yankee land.
@@xavier01110 Your IQ is below 86.
@@thatguy5801 quiet yank. God save Queen Elizabeth II 🇬🇧 God save the House of Windsor 🇬🇧 Dieu Et Mon Droit 🇬🇧
You're against French but you finish in a French quote. The real name is Saxe-Coburg und Gotha, know your history. You're clearly unstable.
why only 52%?
Even if the support for abolishing the monarchy is 100% among random people, it wont matter. Because, what many people don't know I assume, the monarchy in Canada is highly protected by Constitutional act 1982. This act has set a bar for abolishing the monarchy so high, that it's now as difficult as nailing jelly to a tree. Even for Prime Minister himself or his government, this is not something within their capability. It requires a very very special amendment to do it, which will be very difficult to achieve, as well as lengthy and costly. Due to this reason, many political theorist have even labelled abolishing the monarchy in Canada as simply impossible.
@@raqibzaman3199 Really? I thought we could just get rid of the Monarchy anytime we want? It's not really that big of deal, and it's always nice to keep a bit of our history.
A lot of Boomers haven't died yet. Waiting for them to go six feet under and the percentage will change.
@@account527 No, it would require all the provinces to sign off on it, which is very difficult
The constitutional monarchy WORKS... No way do I want to scrap that for something like the U.S. has which obviously is not working well for them. Besides, then instead of having a non-political Head of State that is separate from any political party and who represented the nation itself and had great continuity (which is a wonderful thing during turbulent times when people need an anchor that they know will not float away with the tide)... instead we'd open ourselves up to having a head of state that is from a political party and will change with the tide of office...no continuity... .NO THANKS.
As long as the referendum starts, the question will be whether or not you are confident with the current Canadian institutional and constitutional system without talking about monarchy and republicanism.
Should Canada remain a constitutional monarchy? Yes yes and yes. God Save the Queen.
God Save the Queen and now God Save the King. I vote we stay connected.
That's a great idea, no one head of state. A senate that decides on behalf of Canadians as it should be now. They work for us, not the other way around.
Canadian house of commoners has not one commoner in it.
You mean like America?
Yea, that's going great for them...
@@Whoami691
America isnt a parliamentary republic tho
@@ligondesenuts769 but it still has an elected head of state whose political alignment causes division.
@@Whoami691
Youre talking as if the Crown never caused any division at all
We don't need em
Why are you guys still a constitutional monarchy anyway?? Pretty surprised by that alone. Thought Canada was a republic. You pretty function like one. 🤔🤔
We are Canadian, we dont like to fix what isnt broke and rock the boat. If we tried, we would just being saying sorry for a decade.
@@darkwillis416 🤔🤔 interesting....how does anything get done up there??
@@Shazzyhtown we are a parliamentary system. Like most of these types of government its about compromises. Coaltions are formed between parties to move certain aspects of policies forward.
@@patarp1350 Did you really have to call me a dodo brain? I'm not Canadian...
@@Shazzyhtown You can Google can’t you? Parliamentary Democracy is an easy search term. The disdain for our system is clear in asking how a G7 nation like ours gets anything done. Nobody should call you a dodo brain but perhaps save the disdain if you don’t want to incite a negative response.
The question is not if Canada wants to become a republic or not, the question is rather do we have the appetite to open up lingering questions that comes with the process of amending the constitution.
ASAP
@@patarp1350 We shall remain in disagreement then! The sooner it's gone the better IMO. I don't want to see another documentary aired on CBC.
The change is canada is now almost all new Canadians
The process of removing the Monarchy does not have to take four to five generations as this CBC piece suggests. The process is as simple as one referendum question. Are you in favour of replacing the current Monarchy with Canada's own independent form of Democratically Elected Government where the people of Canada elect a Prime Minister as Canada's Head of State in Parliamentary Democracy form of Government?
I am sure the supreme court of Canada will rule that doing so violates the BNA treaty ugh !! why Canada is subject to a treaty between two foreign nations is beyond me
Not true at all. Read the amending formula for the Canadian Constitution, it is next to impossible to change for a reason.
I been saying this for years. Besides we haven’t had a queen since Victoria
You may say whatever you want, but it won't matter at all. There's still about 95% chance that getting rid of the monarchy cannot or will not ever happen to Canada. Because, what you don't know I assume, the monarchy in Canada is highly protected by Constitutional act 1982. This act has set a bar to abolishing the crown so high, that it's now as difficult as nailing jelly to a tree. Even for Prime Minister himself or his government, this is not something within their capability. It requires a very very special amendment to do it, which will be very difficult to achieve, as well as lengthy and costly. Due to this reason, many political theorist have even labelled abolishing the monarchy in Canada as practically impossible.
United We Stand, Divided We Fall.
May the Union Jack Fly High.
For Queen and Commonwealth!
I feel no particular emotional loyalty to the British crown but the world is what it is and more friends are always better than fewer. If the monarch had any real power here I would feel differently but she doesn't so I'm happy to keep a close alliance alive and well.
It's a truly sad day with the Queen passing away and now is time to end our relationship with the English monarchy. Queen Elizabeth II gave us a lifetime of service, her son is an embarrassment.
Just 52 🤨
Even if the support is 100% among the normal people, it wont matter. There's still about 95% chance that getting rid of the monarchy cannot or will not ever happen to Canada. Because, what they don't know I assume, the monarchy in Canada is highly protected by Constitutional act 1982. This act has set a bar for abolishing the monarchy so high, that it's now as difficult as nailing jelly to a tree. Even for Prime Minister himself or his government, this is not something within their capability. It requires a very very special amendment to do it, which will be very difficult to achieve, as well as lengthy and costly. Due to this reason, many political theorist have even labelled abolishing the monarchy in Canada as practically impossible.
There is almost nothing that is more meaningless than this
How much would it cost Canada to get the Queen off or 20s and our coins? Probably a lot... No thank you. . Keep it the way it is...
They get removed from circulation, and replacements minted regularly anyways, so it doesn't make a difference.
I honestly supported Queen I think after she passes on, do another survey.
Even then opinions from the random public won't matter at all. There's still and always be about 95% chance that getting rid of the monarchy cannot or will not ever happen to Canada. Because, what you don't know I assume, the monarchy in Canada is highly protected by Constitutional act 1982. This act has set a bar for abolishing the crown so high, that it's now as difficult as nailing jelly to a tree. Even for Prime Minister himself or his government, this is not something within their capability. It requires a very very special amendment to do it, which will be very difficult to achieve, as well as lengthy and costly. Due to this reason, many political theorist have even labelled abolishing the monarchy in Canada as practically impossible.
Long live of monarchy in canada
FOREVER!!!!!
who did they poll ? people in Quebec ??? because last time i check 67% of the population supports the queen
You checked everyone in Canada?
I agree, but to be fair I am a Quebecer who adores being part of the CommonWealth AND to my delight, I've been seeing both Quebec and Canada flags half mast all over the place, in respect of our Queen's passing and service. Quebec isn't usually so cooperative and esp. in regard to anything English. Speaks volumes.
I'm all for the British monarchy to stay cause they've been with us since queen Elizabeth became the Queen and she has done her duty as a good queen like she promised all them many years ago! I still remember her words and they still ring louder than ever from the day she spoke from her speech. And she has struggled long and hard to keep her families together and the day she lost her husband that was ultimately the saddest day for her as well as us Canadian's. She is the bridge to our rivers and to lose her is not a happy option!! We love our Queen, I just wish her grandson's would show her a lot more respect I know that would really brighten her heart up!!! She realy does have a hard job it's not easy for her and the way the world is right now it's not going to be anymore easier for her.She has a lot of decisions to make for her people as well as her and other countries!! So I totally understand and am sympathetic to her job as a queen. Plus she's very giving to people who she thinks deserve it!!! Like, sir Shaun Connery!!! That's a good woman in my books!!! Q.E. #1 royal woman in the world & to Canada! 👸🍁🇨🇦🍁🕊️💐🌹🌲🍀🌄🌈🌟⭐🥇👑👒💎🛡️
About damn time
You may say whatever you want, but it won't matter at all. There's still about 95% chance that getting rid of the monarchy cannot or will not ever happen to Canada. Because, what you don't know I assume, the monarchy in Canada is highly protected by Constitutional act 1982. This act has set a bar to abolishing the crown so high, that it's now as difficult as nailing jelly to a tree. Even for Prime Minister himself or his government, this is not something within their capability. It requires a very very special amendment to do it, which will be very difficult to achieve, as well as lengthy and costly. Due to this reason, many political theorist have even labelled abolishing the monarchy in Canada as practically impossible.
They would most likely have to ask Quebecs permission
Done with the monarchy’s they represent nothing good this days !
God Save the Queen and all those who come after.
I support Canada being a republic.
Whatever cbc. You are not credible anymore!
I don't have an opinion on this, but CANZUK sounds nice.
Canadian independence + CANZUK sounds good
I wouldn't want to be a Republic though. Sounds too American/banana republic
@@Etaoinshrdlu69 nobody is asking to change the name of the country
But, what you think of when you hear the word “republic” vs what the form of government actually is are _completely unrelated_
But Canada you where our favourite 🇬🇧🏴🏴🏴
And you are many of our favourite! Stronger together.
Northern Ireland DOES Count, Shachi
It'd be nice to become a republic before Charles is king.
Agreed. Beat it Queen. Beat it Governor General.
UK after the US is still the most well connected country, they also have one of the strongest militaries in the world, Canada cannot keep Canada safe, and we shouldn't rely on the US for everything. It connects Canada more to the world and protects us. On the other hand it would be nice to have our full independence
Jey that’s retarted one because Canada should rely on Canada. The reason why Canada got independence of some sort was because Britain would put America before Canada, and it still does.
So Canada goes to the British then to the US then back to Britain when America is the superpower. Britain is just gonna side with America as usual
@@savagesurpreme7856 Huh? Britain would always side with Canada. I think you forget that our head of state is Queen Elizabeth II. Our countries are connected and we will always choose Canada. Canada needs the UK and the Commonwealth. Relying on the US is a dangerous game.
I agree we are stronger united than separated. What a strange time we live in. People would be wise to focus more on the politics of division and how our governments spend and waste our money; poor services, health systems collapsing.
The difficulty comes after deciding to become a republic. How to determine what the process should be to replace the Governor General.
Australia decided to remain tied to the UK as they couldn’t agree on an alternative all could agree to. Personally though originally from the UK it’s time to become a republic.
Why "replace" the Governor General? Besides dissolving parliament and swearing people in the Queen's name, they don't actually DO anything.
they don't use any power anyway. Just keep it as a historical thing and special honor, but take away all legal power.
@@biggibbs4678 that's how a lot of countries do it with a weak ceremonial president and a Prime minister that actually leads the government/parliament.
Just replace GG with a "President" and it is usually a ceremonial role although some countries like Mauritius let the President assent to legislation enacted. PM still holds the power
The Governor General can just be the president too. Its usually the prime minister who does the job in the government in a parliamentary republic
so who knows maybe sooner or later we will see "The Republic of Canada"!
I didn't see any poll and I would have voted in favour of remaining Common Wealth hands up. So this poll asked who exactly? More political leanings perhaps. If people really want to complain about $ maybe start looking at how our governments are spending or should I say wasting our money and getting rich for feeding division vs unity politics. The cost of elections, and all the hidden stuff. Look at our health system across the country. Shameful. the Monarchy stokes unity and are great ambassadors for such. Make the poll available to all and you will likely see different results, more in favour.
Long live the queen 👑
Now, Canadians are eventually waking up!
Random people can say whatever they want, but it won't matter at all. There's still about 95% chance that getting rid of the monarchy cannot or will not ever happen to Canada. Because, what they don't know I assume, the monarchy in Canada is highly protected by Constitutional act 1982. This act has set a bar for abolishing the monarchy so high, that it's now as difficult as nailing jelly to a tree. Even for Prime Minister himself or his government, this is not something within their capability. It requires a very very special amendment to do it, which will be very difficult to achieve, as well as lengthy and costly. Due to this reason, many political theorist have even labelled abolishing the monarchy in Canada as practically impossible.
Time to ditch the "Monarchy" once and for all!
And I am one of the people that was surveyed on this.
Highly questionable poll. I have no desire to switch to an inferior form of government and lose part of our identity.
Monarchy at this times means IGNORANCE
I’m sorry I will be reporting this video to UA-cam, as it contains a public dislike statistic... which could be harmful to various snowflakes.
Republic of Canada sounds good!! We can do it!! Down with the queen!!
Nice
Criminals should not be praised kick them out lock them up
The queen should come back to the US
There would not even be a Brition if the allies , Re. Canada, and others haden't sent thousands and thousands of soldiers, sailors and airmen in WW2.
Gonna add that to the hundreds of thousands Britain already had?
G.G.Jean’s acceptance of Harpers political ploy to prorogue parliament to avoid parliamentary will is when I switched from pro const. monarchy to pro-republic
Is a constitucional colony, Canada needs to leave the Conmonwealth.
If there is a referendum in Canada and the people choose a republic, what politician will stand in their way?
Hi everyone well I'm not from Canada but from France and in my opinion I think Canada should remove Queen Elizabeth II because she doesn't have any political power.
Yes
Drop the monarchy
You may say whatever you want, but it won't matter at all. There's still about 95% chance that getting rid of the monarchy cannot or will not ever happen to Canada. Because, what you don't know I assume, the monarchy in Canada is highly protected by Constitutional act 1982. This act has set a bar to abolishing the crown so high, that it's now as difficult as nailing jelly to a tree. Even for Prime Minister himself or his government, this is not something within their capability. It requires a very very special amendment to do it, which will be very difficult to achieve, as well as lengthy and costly. Due to this reason, many political theorist have even labelled abolishing the monarchy in Canada as simply impossible.
When enough people decide that this relic from the past needs to be removed from our modern society, we will suddenly find "impossible" actually just means inconvenient for those in charge (especially the un-elected ones)
My background is MacKenzie, Stewart and Spencer, so I have roots that stretch across the sea to Scotland, England, Ireland, and France. Our Stewart roots in Canada will celebrate our 95th family reunion in 2022. I look forward to seeing Princess Diana Spencer's son Prince William assuming the throne and reigning in a more modernized British Empire including Canada. After all our Parliamentary system of democratic governance is rooted in the British government system. We have enjoyed amiable relations with the British Monarchy to date. Let's move forward with the New Young Prince William.
Man you might as well go back over the see since you Miss your family this much
Cannot help but notice that you missed Charlie in the succession there...
Cannot blame you really...
@@Ocean-yl4do Our reunion is in Ontario, but we are spread out worldwide! I would rather have a sovereign Dominion than a Republic. I do believe we are fortunate to have our alliance with the Monarchy that accords strength to each partner.
@@janemackenzie6061 why do you think that we would not have an alliance with the UK if we stopped having the queen as our head of state
That literally makes no sense.
Do you have any actual reasons for staying a dominion?
That support for republicanism was a huge humiliation for the Canadian federation and also for incoming King George VII (Prince Charles) and King William V (Prince William) in general!
I would be ashamed of us as a country if we did this...
I am a subject of the crown first and a Canadian second
sounds kind of cucked to submit to a ruler who gained that title by birthright… but okay…
What many people don't know I assume, monarchy in Canada is highly protected by Constitutional act 1982. This act has set a bar for abolishing the monarchy, so high and now it's as difficult as nailing jelly to a tree. Even Prime Minister himself and his government cannot do it, it's not something within their capability. It requires a very very special amendment to do it, which is a difficult to achieve, as well as lengthy and costly. So, many political theorist have even labelled it as practically impossible.
I'm with you there.
I think when CANZUK happens we can keep a shared head of state. Canada was born from this very system. Long may it last.
CANZUK is a right wing fantasy.
Abolish it.
Anyone think about what happens with all the crown land in this country?
The question is is she helping canadians to be a better place..or we are just giving her money and feeding them.
Its not a superficial issue. The split and division of powers Is one of the core reasons why Canada works so well as a country. Republics tend to be messier and poorer than constitutional monarchies as I look around the world
I hope Canada will ditch monarchy and become a real country.
Its the other way around if canada ditched the monarchy it would fall
@@dereksmith6693 no it wouldn't
@@cesarzpontu8886 it will be just like the second united states. Its bad for us
@@dereksmith6693 how would that be bad for you. And i f you think that the only diffrence between Candians and Americans is the Queen, then you don't know Canadians at all.
Nice
I think after the Queen Elizabeth II passes, we should be independent. It should be greatly appreciated for our Culture as a country.
We are independent. The Canadian Crown and British Crown are two separate entities. We just have the same person who wears/symbolizes our crowns.
India throwed the monarchy out window on the first chance they got! way to do with heredity system and we are proud of some of the presidents who rose from absolute poverty to highest office of the country
And what a mess India is in.
@@sedekiman yes, India just displaced UK to become 5th largest economy but UK took 200 years to pull India from richest country to poster child of poverty.
Dislike 👎