What is Discourse Analysis? | Michel Foucault | Keyword
Вставка
- Опубліковано 28 вер 2024
- In this episode, I present discourse analysis through the lens of Michel Foucault.
If you want to support me, you can do that with these links:
Patreon: / theoryandphilosophy
paypal.me/theoryphilosophy
Twitter: @DavidGuignion
IG: @theory_and_philosophy
Podbean: theoretician.p...
Sometimes you do those short videos defining a term, a video of “archaeology” and “genealogy” as methodology used/defined by Foucault and others would be great!
Some work on Agamben's use would be wonderful!
Brillianttt!! Best explanations, as usual, making things simple still complete, round, and clear. Subscribed!
Thank you bro. Hope you ll talk in depth about critical discourse analysis, epistemic CDA and multimodality CDA.
hey bossman thank you so so much for these videos I'm getting into philosophy through your content and it's been absolutely incredible thank you thank you
This has helped so much for writing my thesis research proposal - thanks so much
I am currently tring to use method of discourse analyisis to finish my bachlor thises
Hey David. This was very interesting, thank you for this video.
i spaced out. i have no idea what you’re talking about but you have a nice voice and seem to know what you’re talking about tho
love to listen to this stuff while going to sleep and while awake ofc, golden voice
please help, how do i cite this reference?
After many blabla with hurry, what is the discours and what is its difference with paradigm?
Clear precise language
Ayo', David. I'm cool with your redefining Foucault's terminology, but not in a discussion where he is not taking part. Tell me about discourse analysis or tell me about needless digging up of intellectual groundwork. Do we understand one another on the basic rules as applied to serious intellectual investigations?
He didn’t redefine them; he explained discourse analysis as a construction of a field or discourse by bringing together disparate ideas and lumping them into a category that becomes constitutive of knowledge. Also your quip that we can’t redefine if the thinker isn’t there is asinine: 80% of the philosophers we talk about are dead, but what we take from their ideas extends beyond that corporeality.
@@gavinyoung-philosophy It's essential though in intellectual work, to understand exactly what the author says. Unless the text itself was meant to be interpreted (like poetry or religious writings).
I’m doing my thesis right now, and you just made my brain click. Thank you so much!
Loved it ❣️from India🇮🇳
Lol.
Wa gajod ko kasabot
1. draw a vertical line
2. at the top of that line write physics
2. at the bottom of that line just a couple of mm above the ground make a mark
3. from that point draw to lines in a 50 degree angle
4. That area represent the beginning of physics
5. As they discover new knowledge within the filed the mark is places further and further up the line
6. Within the triagle we can retrospektiv place aristoteles and Einstein they are part of the history of physics just like their theories is
I'm writing my notes for upcoming exam. After so many searching of videos, I found this. Thank you for making me understand so easily and clearly.
I'm so glad I came across this. Very useful in making sense of the world.
i love you, thank you.
super helpful for my research project thank you!
Amazing! Thank you!
Awesome, thank you!
Thank you for this video :) ❤️❤️❤️
❣️❣️❣️❣️
Love your vids keep ‘em comin
Good job!
Congrats! You explain everything so clearly, well done - you are helping me a lot
Did you just use ‘beg the question’ incorrectly?
It wouldn't be the first time
Foucault ? .. Foucoff ! . . Who is the final arbitrator of what goes into what category ? .. this is Foucault's way of denying or reifying any position he, or anyone wants. And typical of the French language, where everything trails off into ambiguity .. same here: doors wide open for decadence to come barging in.
That's because you are locked into a dualistic thinking way of power
I don't think that's the case. Foucault denied being classified as a postmodernist, and for good reason. He did not claim that all ideas should be treated equal. He realized that some ideas exert dominance over others, and that should not be the case. If I correctly understand his thinking: dominant ideas should stop persecuting minor ones, and instead start rectifying and improving themselves through understanding of the ways, with which they oppose them. Contrary to almost every postmodernist, Foucault did not impose any solutions. He instead presented a real problem that was almost never discussed before.