THE BATTLE OF BRITAIN (1969) | The Spitfire Squadron Defends Britain | MGM

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 2 лис 2022
  • In 1940, the British Royal Air Force fights a desperate battle to prevent the Luftwaffe from gaining air superiority over the English Channel as a prelude to a possible Axis invasion of the U.K.
    Subscribe: / @amazonmgmstudios
    Watch more MGM videos: • Movie Clips | MGM
    The Battle of Britain (1969)
    Directed by Guy Hamilton
    Screenplay by James Kennaway & Wilfred Greatorex
    Cast: Harry Andrews, Michael Caine, Trevor Howard, Curt Jurgens, Ian McShane, Kenneth More, Laurence Olivier, Nigel Patrick, Christopher Plummer, Michael Redgrave, Ralph Richardson, Robert Shaw, Patrick Wymark, Susannah York
    Rated G
    Available on Blu-Ray, DVD and digital platforms.
    Connect with MGM Studios Online
    Visit the MGM Studios WEBSITE: www.mgm.com/
    Check out MGM on TIKTOK: / mgmstudios
    Follow MGM Studios on INSTAGRAM: / mgmstudios
    Follow MGM Studios on TWITTER: / mgm_studios
    Like MGM Studios on FACEBOOK: / mgm
    About MGM Studios: Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Inc. is a leading entertainment company focused on the production and distribution of film and television content globally. The company owns one of the world’s deepest libraries of premium film and television content. In addition, MGM has investments in domestic and international television channels, including MGM-branded channels.
    The Battle of Britain (1969)
    / mgm
    #MGM #TheBattleofBritain
  • Розваги

КОМЕНТАРІ • 405

  • @nickcox2435
    @nickcox2435 Рік тому +195

    The models used in this film were all made by a chap called Mick Charles who owned a ran a model shop in south London until it closed five or so years ago.

    • @cpj93070
      @cpj93070 Рік тому +14

      You mean the Stuka's? they were the only models used for the film, the rest were all real aircraft.

    • @gdwlaw5549
      @gdwlaw5549 10 місяців тому +8

      The shop was in Frimley Green,Surrey. A very large model of the Henkel 111 could be seen in the window shop front until the early 80’s. As a teenager we would drive past quite often on the way to see our grandparents in Deepcut. We did stop to take a look on a number of occasions.

    • @johnmorris7815
      @johnmorris7815 9 місяців тому

      Yep , I used to be a regular there.

    • @gdwlaw5549
      @gdwlaw5549 9 місяців тому +1

      @@johnmorris7815 interesting. I imagine the shop is now closed. It was a very regular drive for our family from The Solent to Deepcut to visit our grandparents.

    • @johnmorris7815
      @johnmorris7815 9 місяців тому

      @@gdwlaw5549 I think so, Mick’s son took over for a time but I guess it closed a few years back.

  • @alantunbridge8919
    @alantunbridge8919 Рік тому +142

    I was living in Luton at the time this film was made. Most of the aircraft flew from Duxford , but I was surprised to see a Spitfire fly over so I went to the airport & saw it plus one other I think put away in Hunting’s old flight shed,but my biggest surprise was when the aerial filming aircraft turned up. It was a B25 painted in very garish colours. The irony of this was that it was older than the Messerschmidt’s & Heinkel’s taking part which were Spanish license built & fitted with Rolls-Royce Merlin engines. that can be seen by the exhaust coming out of the top of the engine cowling instead of the bottom. I hope this is of some interest. I think I still have a couple of photographs I took at the time.

    • @robharris8844U
      @robharris8844U Рік тому +7

      Most of the sky combat was actually filmed in Spain as better weather conditions.The more limited scenes actually over Dover England were then inserted , such as the cliffs.Even in 1968-69 there were limitations in the number of flyable spitfires left - hence the Spanish airforce collection was useful.

    • @alantunbridge8919
      @alantunbridge8919 Рік тому +2

      @@robharris8844U The filming in Spain would explain the German aircraft not being seen in England ,plus the availability of appropriate aircraft.

    • @robharris8844U
      @robharris8844U Рік тому +1

      @@alantunbridge8919 Yes, the German planes were from Spain ( left over from the help they gave Franco possibly) Fantastic job done on the scenes though, when you realise CGi did not exist, I think the special effect of the day was painted planes on glass to make the numbers in formation look larger.

    • @raypurchase801
      @raypurchase801 Рік тому +6

      The B25 camera plane was also used for "633 Squadron". It can be glimpsed in that movie, supposedly being used as the aircraft being used to carry George Chikiris back to Norway.

    • @alantunbridge8919
      @alantunbridge8919 Рік тому +6

      @@raypurchase801 The mention of 633 Squqdron also brings back memories. During my apprenticeship at Hunting Aircraft ,in probably 1964, when I was working in the Stress Office I heard a noise & looking up I saw a Mosquto at low level heading above the then airport approach road closely followed by two more . Rushing to the window I saw the last one do a barrel roll over the airfield & disappear in the general direction of Hatfield. My father worked at DH in WW2 buiding them (Percival,later Hunting Aircraft also built them) & I still have a toolbox he made incorporating some Mosquito plywood.

  • @hc3932
    @hc3932 Рік тому +107

    I love the scene with Edward Fox bailing out and landing in the greenhouse, the young boy is so proud to offer that cigarette. “Thanks awfully old chap”

    • @raypurchase801
      @raypurchase801 Рік тому +9

      This looks like it was must've been based on an actual incident, but I can't find any reference in the books I've read.

    • @walterkronkitesleftshoe6684
      @walterkronkitesleftshoe6684 11 місяців тому +4

      @@raypurchase801 It is often said to be the depiction of the actions of RAF Sgt Pilot Ray Holmes of 504 sqd Fighter Command on 15th September 1940.

    • @raypurchase801
      @raypurchase801 11 місяців тому +7

      @@walterkronkitesleftshoe6684 THANKS! I'm also curious about the scene where Robert Shaw's squadron leader speaks to the corporal with the German prisoners. "Give 'em a bloody shovel". Like most of the scenes in the movie, it's probably based on an actual incident.

    • @josephstevens9888
      @josephstevens9888 10 місяців тому +6

      One of my favorite scenes in the movie!

    • @raypurchase801
      @raypurchase801 10 місяців тому

      @@josephstevens9888 "You can teach monkeys to fly better than that!"

  • @chriscarter5720
    @chriscarter5720 Рік тому +159

    IMO the finest aerial combat scenes in any movie ever. And real aircraft; no CGI (Except for the burning 109) and models used only when that type didn't exist (eg JU87) or they wanted to show a crash.

    • @barniem3148
      @barniem3148 Рік тому +10

      It's not even conventional CGI, think they had to draw the special effects onto the negative film one frame at a time? Something like that - hours and hours of work.
      CGI wasn't used in movies until much later during the mid 70's onwards and "perfected" with Jurassic Park (1993), which is the digital motion capture type CGI we have today.

    • @oldgoat142
      @oldgoat142 Рік тому +8

      @@barniem3148 They did have to draw it out. By hand. The technology to do it mechanically didn't exist back then so they had to draw it out during editing. Cartoonists were hired to do the job since they knew how to do it and all cartoons were hand drawn cell-by-cell back in those days.

    • @alanjm1234
      @alanjm1234 Рік тому +5

      No CGI because there weren't really any computers.

    • @garyeastment
      @garyeastment Рік тому +3

      Agree, wonderful movie, but... Dunkirk?

    • @JohnyG29
      @JohnyG29 Рік тому +4

      ​@@garyeastmentDunkirk's aerial bits are rubbish (if you are talking about the recent film).

  • @MysteriousMarsupial
    @MysteriousMarsupial Рік тому +38

    Imagine acting with just the eyes and conveying that kind of intensity. No CGI in existance can match these classics.

  • @nemosis9449
    @nemosis9449 Рік тому +66

    The scene where the Luftwaffe bombers flying up the Thames towards London i think i was about 9 when my dad, an ex RN veteran just got up and walked thru the front door (i followed) and stood looking up east towards Woolwich in the east when about 40-50 planes appeared out of the sky heading towards the city .The rumble of engines i hadn't noticed but he had. I remember the noise and the people running out of there houses to see what the fuss was about as my mum ( who lived thru the blitz) took one look and said F**k this and ran back inside.

  • @christopherbrowne736
    @christopherbrowne736 Рік тому +140

    A beautifully crafted film. Authentic, accurate and anointed.
    The contemporary films don’t even get close.
    I salute these brave young men.

    • @MarkHarrison733
      @MarkHarrison733 Рік тому +5

      They died for nothing.

    • @JamesRichards-mj9kw
      @JamesRichards-mj9kw 10 місяців тому +2

      This awful film was a huge flop.

    • @raypurchase801
      @raypurchase801 10 місяців тому +17

      @@JamesRichards-mj9kw Expressing your hatred like this suggests you'd prefer the OTHER side to have won.

    • @JamesRichards-mj9kw
      @JamesRichards-mj9kw 10 місяців тому +4

      @@raypurchase801 We should have allied with Germany against the real threat.

    • @johnord684
      @johnord684 9 місяців тому

      @@JamesRichards-mj9kw wow what a fool you are.

  • @Deevo037
    @Deevo037 Рік тому +16

    That and Tora Tora Tora were brilliant movies, neither got the commercial appreciation they deserved.

  • @rcaso9561
    @rcaso9561 Рік тому +19

    I happened to visit the Oberschleissheim branch of the Deutsches Mus yrs ago (2001?) which is a former Luftwaffe airfield. It features a restoration center and from the observation deck, I could see what looked like an He-111 fuselage being restored. I thought it had to be one from the movie. I conned my way into the area and was given an impromptu tour by a super nice resto guy there and he confirmed it was one of planes used in the BOB movie - a CASA used by the Spanish AF. Since it's my favorite movie, it was a life experience for me to make such a connection.

  • @gec-o2167
    @gec-o2167 Рік тому +43

    The flying sequences using authentic aircraft in this film are still awesome.

  • @dooniskea
    @dooniskea Рік тому +19

    The sound design in these sequences is fantastic.

  • @hrafnofthule5962
    @hrafnofthule5962 2 місяці тому +14

    If they all, the German, British, Polish, French and Dutch could see Europe now. Sad state.

  • @mscommerce
    @mscommerce 8 місяців тому +29

    This movie deserves a fresh, digitally cleaned up print, and a major theatrical re-release.

    • @raypurchase801
      @raypurchase801 7 місяців тому +3

      Wouldn't be allowed a general release today.
      Too many w height people.
      No subplot about transgender aircrew seeking acceptance in a homophobic environment.

    • @MarkHarrison733
      @MarkHarrison733 7 місяців тому +2

      @@raypurchase801 People were not interested in this racist film in 1969.

    • @JamesRichards-mj9kw
      @JamesRichards-mj9kw 6 місяців тому +1

      @@raypurchase801 The film flopped in 1969.

    • @raypurchase801
      @raypurchase801 6 місяців тому +4

      @@JamesRichards-mj9kw No. The film was a success, but it had gone over budget and it took a couple more decades to claw back the expenditure. Nothing unusual in that.

    • @JamesRichards-mj9kw
      @JamesRichards-mj9kw 6 місяців тому +1

      @@raypurchase801 It was a massive flop all over the world, losing $10 million and bankrupting the terrorist supporter Saltzman.

  • @briancharters8720
    @briancharters8720 Рік тому +24

    The SOUND of those SPITFIRES… GOOSE BUMPS!!! Ear candy!

  • @excelgazialimuhiddinhacibekir
    @excelgazialimuhiddinhacibekir Рік тому +65

    A timeless classic among all WW II air battle movies. I believe this movie proved very inspirational for the making of "Dunkirk" by Christopher Nolan in 2017 (if I am not mistaken).

    • @benlewis2475
      @benlewis2475 Рік тому +5

      The spitfires sequences were well done. Nice touch with Michael Caine as the controller.

    • @juliocesarpereira4325
      @juliocesarpereira4325 Рік тому

      I was thinking exactly that while watching it.

    • @azimisyauqieabdulwahab9401
      @azimisyauqieabdulwahab9401 Рік тому +6

      Dunkirk is better original version in 1958

    • @BedtimeStoriesChannel
      @BedtimeStoriesChannel Рік тому +1

      @@benlewis2475 Michael Caine was the Squadron Leader

    • @benlewis2475
      @benlewis2475 Рік тому

      @@BedtimeStoriesChannel I know. But I was referring to the film Dunkirk where he was the voice of the controller.

  • @LeroyKinkade
    @LeroyKinkade 5 місяців тому +6

    Quint survived and went on to hunt sharks for a living.

  • @benyounger3416
    @benyounger3416 Рік тому +7

    2:01 you can’t beat the sound of that Merlin

  • @raypurchase801
    @raypurchase801 Рік тому +32

    FUN FACT: Only two Heinkels were brought over to England, to be filmed alongside Spitfires and Hurricanes. The "wide" shots of massed Heinkels were filmed above Spain. The sky looks pretty-much the same everywhere. Cleverly interspersing the shots of two Heinkels with the massed formation makes it look like all the shots were filmed in the same place on the same day.

    • @asicdathens
      @asicdathens 9 місяців тому +1

      Fun Fact: The "Henkels" from Spain had Rolls Royce Merlin engines

    • @douglaslorin739
      @douglaslorin739 3 місяці тому

      ​@@asicdathensNearly all the full sized aircraft, both British and German/Spanish were powered by Merlin V12s.

  • @hanpolo2727
    @hanpolo2727 11 місяців тому +22

    One of the most important battles in WW2 it essentially decided the fate of our Country.

    • @JamesRichards-mj9kw
      @JamesRichards-mj9kw 10 місяців тому +2

      It ensured the UK would be a satellite of the United States, Europe would be Communist and Islamic, and the British Empire would cease to exist.

    • @thethirdman225
      @thethirdman225 10 місяців тому +4

      Yes and no. Germany was not really in a position to invade successfully.

    • @quineloe
      @quineloe 8 місяців тому

      correct. During the Norway campaign, the Wehrmacht paratroopers seized many Norway airfields and the Luftwaffe immediately had those available to attack the British Navy at Narvik. All, literally all they had to show was a Tribal Class destroyer and a completley outdated, 25 year old light crusier sunk in two months. They repeatedly sortied against the Royal Navy in the North Sea and failed to sink anything else.
      In return, HMS Warspite, an old WW1 Dreadnaught, steamed into the 4th destroyer flotilla and sunk all eight Kriegsmarine destroyers without losing a single ship. That was just one capital ship, and the British had dozens of those.
      The Luftwaffe was not the Imperial Japanese Navy. They were downright awful at sinking warships. Air superiority would not have helped. @@thethirdman225

    • @Rapptor22
      @Rapptor22 8 місяців тому +3

      Now you guys can't even keep out all the migrants coming into your country.

    • @PepitoMegaChocolato
      @PepitoMegaChocolato 4 місяці тому

      The Battle of Kursk is surely the confrontation which was the most decisive in terms of the outcome of WW2

  • @user-ig7cg8sn3g
    @user-ig7cg8sn3g Рік тому +6

    当時スペイン空軍にあったハインケルと
    メッサーシュミット(ライセンス生産機)を
    残らず調達して当時のカラーリングに
    しました。さすがにスピットファイアと
    ホーカーハリケーンは動態保存の良い機体が
    沢山あってこの映画は出来上がりました。
    ここまで細部に渡り見せてくれた映画は
    他にはありませんわ❤

  • @johnholt890
    @johnholt890 Рік тому +8

    The Film will never be real flying sequences like these ever again.

  • @West_Coast_Gang
    @West_Coast_Gang 2 місяці тому +2

    2:54 dang, that’s probably my favorite scene

  • @richardjakobek7477
    @richardjakobek7477 2 дні тому

    Marvellous stuff, and no CGI.

  • @benlewis2475
    @benlewis2475 Рік тому +34

    One of the best airborne combat scenes ever made. Couldn’t make it today

    • @thethirdman225
      @thethirdman225 10 місяців тому +1

      What makes you say that?

    • @minerran
      @minerran 9 місяців тому

      Now they often don't even need real hardware. Computer work is very realistic. Star Wars certainly was not filmed in space, was it!

    • @thethirdman225
      @thethirdman225 9 місяців тому

      @@minerran Agreed, as long as they don't make a Spitfire fly like an F-16.

  • @MajSolo
    @MajSolo Рік тому +8

    so well done movie it holds up today

  • @craigs71
    @craigs71 Рік тому +8

    I remember many moons ago (the late 70's I think) going to an airshow at RAF Finningly and seeing one of the Heinkel cockpits they used in this movie.

  • @jules2545
    @jules2545 Рік тому +11

    Keith Park, now there was a leader.

    • @raypurchase801
      @raypurchase801 Рік тому +5

      Agreed. Definiterly.

    • @andrewisotope8146
      @andrewisotope8146 День тому

      Yeah but Dowding was the man who made the real difference, he pushed for the chain home radar system and urged Churchill to withhold those fighter squadrons from being wasted in the French campaign, had those squadrons been lost we'd have had nothing left to defend the UK with later.

    • @andrewisotope8146
      @andrewisotope8146 День тому

      I Acknowledge he was an organiser but Dowding was the main man.

  • @gusm2752
    @gusm2752 Рік тому +10

    Love this movie. In my collection 👍

  • @jasonmussett2129
    @jasonmussett2129 Рік тому +4

    One of my all time faves👍

  • @paullacey2999
    @paullacey2999 Рік тому +6

    Real film!No cgi.....

  • @prateektripathi4524
    @prateektripathi4524 Рік тому +12

    Best movie ❤️

  • @ThePierre58
    @ThePierre58 Рік тому +32

    Had the book of how the movie was made. Lots of American pilots owned spitfires and flew as a part of the film in 1969.

    • @colinbarron4
      @colinbarron4 Рік тому +3

      I think you are referring to the Confederate Air Force. They owned three Hispano Buchons and they were used in the production, flown by CAF pilots lead by the late Connie Edwards.

    • @Bruce-1956
      @Bruce-1956 Рік тому +2

      The German aircraft were loaned by the Spanish Air Force.

    • @colinbarron4
      @colinbarron4 Рік тому +3

      @@Bruce-1956 That is true but the Spanish Air Force had already agreed to sell three of the Buchons to the Confederate Air Force. An agreement was struck in which these three would take part in the film along with the other Buchons , but flown by CAF pilots.

    • @ThePierre58
      @ThePierre58 Рік тому

      @@colinbarron4 Thanks, I vaguely recall reading that.

    • @raypurchase801
      @raypurchase801 Рік тому

      Yes, I read that book as a kid.
      Still got it somewhere.

  • @raptormesh
    @raptormesh Місяць тому +1

    One of my favourite movies of all time.

  • @GDP105
    @GDP105 Рік тому +1

    1:27 - this maneuver looks nice.

  • @DerekHoscorner
    @DerekHoscorner Рік тому +4

    Awesomeness

  • @TundeEszlari
    @TundeEszlari Рік тому +4

    Super video.😇

  • @rbf100
    @rbf100 Рік тому +29

    The unsung hero of the battle was the Hurricane whose priority target was the Luftwaffe bombers.

    • @donarthiazi2443
      @donarthiazi2443 Рік тому

      Absolutely. Why does the Hurricane never receive much praise? Yes, I know the Spitfire was a more capable aircraft, but the Hurricane was also a great little fighter. I just wish our awesome cousins across the pond had more powerful machine guns... at least the .50 cal.
      Seems like ejection problems kept the mighty 20mm Hispano out of the fight... not sure though.

    • @MrVolvobloke
      @MrVolvobloke Рік тому +7

      Ah the standard old youtube reply. Why can we never watch anything about Spitfires without 'But it was the Hurricane that did all the work, the hurricane this, the hurricane that'...There is a myth that the Hurricanes went after the bombers and the Spitfires took on the fighters, but in reality they both took on whatever was in front, pilot histories bear this out. But the fact remains that only 1/3 of fighter command had Spitfires and they still scored 46% of the kills, a much higher ratio than Hurricanes. You were also far more likely to be shot down in a Hurricane. If we had had only Hurricanes we would have been in trouble. Hurricanes had a ratio of I hurricane lost for every 1.6 German machines, whereas the Spitfire had a ratio of 1 Spitfire lost to every 2.3 German machines. I'm not interested in which was the 'true' hero of the battle of Britain, They were BOTH the true heroes and I love both aeroplanes, but can we for once just enjoy a clip of Spitfires without the tedious 'but the Hurricane......'

    • @raypurchase801
      @raypurchase801 Рік тому +5

      @@MrVolvobloke Well Done for opposing the myth about Hurricanes targeting the bombers whereas the Spitfires targeted the fighters. A myth so frequently repeated, it's become accepted fact.

  • @evancrum6811
    @evancrum6811 7 місяців тому +1

    Amazing movie. Also.....Michael Caine did a 'cameo' as squadron leader on Dunkirk as a voice!

    • @MarkHarrison733
      @MarkHarrison733 7 місяців тому +2

      This film was garbage. Caine was far too old, like most of the others playing pilots.

  • @mikebennet7697
    @mikebennet7697 9 місяців тому +1

    I like how even back then they used simple electronics to track the progress of a battle.

    • @richardsimpson3792
      @richardsimpson3792 8 місяців тому +2

      RAF Fighter Command was the first centralised data clearing centre in the world.
      Inputs from the Met Office, Home Chain RDF (radar), Observer Corps, signal interceptions etc and reports from the aircraft and RAF bases themselves.
      Back then, the UK led the world in TV, telecoms, radio etc.
      All thrown away.

  • @danielmoran9902
    @danielmoran9902 11 місяців тому +3

    And they managed all that without Johnny Mills! A good day's work, gentlemen!

  • @SteamLance
    @SteamLance Місяць тому

    See now the .303 machine guns weren't actually as fast firing, as is depicted in the film. But I won't lie from the first time I watched it, I love how fast they sound

  • @robertbruce7686
    @robertbruce7686 Рік тому +5

    "Leave the flaming fighters....it's the bloody bombers we want...."

    • @raypurchase801
      @raypurchase801 Рік тому +2

      As spoken by Douglas Bader during the Battle, but he used a different F-word.
      According to Bader's biography, the word got him into trouble because it was overheard by the many WAAFs on duty.

  • @jamesforte-mason8849
    @jamesforte-mason8849 6 місяців тому +4

    This is a fantastic film, I cant believe it was made in 1969. Incredible filming and effects.
    I watch it right through, it makes me proud to be British.
    Of course nowadays, BBC wouldn't show it in case it offends the Germans, or not WOKE enough because all the actors are white.

    • @JamesRichards-mj9kw
      @JamesRichards-mj9kw 6 місяців тому +3

      The film was a huge flop, with very bad special effects and very obvious models.
      The battle is why England is Islamic now.

    • @daneelolivaw602
      @daneelolivaw602 6 місяців тому +2

      @@JamesRichards-mj9kw
      Grow up muppet.

    • @JamesRichards-mj9kw
      @JamesRichards-mj9kw 6 місяців тому +3

      @@daneelolivaw602 Churchill was bribed by Strakosch.

    • @daneelolivaw602
      @daneelolivaw602 6 місяців тому +1

      @@JamesRichards-mj9kw
      Still a muppet i see.

    • @JamesRichards-mj9kw
      @JamesRichards-mj9kw 6 місяців тому +4

      @@daneelolivaw602 Churchill openly confirmed it.

  • @UnleashthePhury
    @UnleashthePhury Рік тому +2

    1:33 “Roger Red 3, I see them” followed by the enemy fighters banking exactly the way the incoming TIEs do

    • @kirkp7470
      @kirkp7470 Рік тому

      TIEs???

    • @theloneranger8725
      @theloneranger8725 9 місяців тому

      @@kirkp7470 I believe he is referring to Imperial TIE fighters featured in the George Lucas Star Wars movies. Lucas studied old fighter dogfight films to base the movements of his CGI and model Star Wars fighters on.

  • @animelovers000
    @animelovers000 Рік тому +4

    1:48-2:00 The spit showing a great demonstration how much more manoeuvrable it was to the 109

    • @xj900uk
      @xj900uk 11 місяців тому +1

      The Me109 had a far better power-weight ratio thanks to its DB fuel-injected 601 engine, which actually gave it the edge especially at high altitude. Surprisingly, it was nearly as manoeverable as the Spitfire, but only Aces would really take it to the edge because of its very unpredictable stall at low speed; also the 'Emile' had a bit of a reputation for weakness and the wings and tail tended to fall off if you tried to flog it too hard, which put off a lot of pilots from trying to 'dance with a Spit', as Galland puts it in his autobiography. Funnily enough, Galland preferred fighting Spitfires as he always said they were easier to shoot down than the Hurricane... he certainly got a lot of them so perhaps he knew what he was talking about...

    • @JamesRichards-mj9kw
      @JamesRichards-mj9kw 10 місяців тому +3

      German aeroplanes were far better.

    • @xj900uk
      @xj900uk 10 місяців тому +2

      @@JamesRichards-mj9kw Don't think there was that much to choose between the Spit and the Me109. The Hurricane was a little slower and had a poorer rate of climb, but could absorb more punishment, was more forgiving to novices and was very easier to maintain/repair, as well as manufacture.

    • @JamesRichards-mj9kw
      @JamesRichards-mj9kw 10 місяців тому +2

      @@xj900uk The UK and its defunct empire was only a satellite of the United States by 1941.

    • @cpj93070
      @cpj93070 7 місяців тому

      @@xj900uk Spitfire pilots had no problem shooting down more 109s than the other way around, anyway later Mks of Spitfires were vastly superior to the 109 and the FW 190.

  • @estabaescrito
    @estabaescrito Рік тому

    great Film

  • @julietharty1965
    @julietharty1965 6 місяців тому

    Amazing really when the totality of firepower was about 17 seconds from start to finish. Short bursts men!!!

  • @colinbarron4
    @colinbarron4 Рік тому +11

    The film is actually called 'Battle of Britain' not 'The Battle of Britain.' However, when production first started it was to be called 'The Battle of Britain.'

  • @brendascully5068
    @brendascully5068 9 місяців тому +4

    Top guns of their day please restore this film to be enjoyed and revered by a new generation

    • @MarkHarrison733
      @MarkHarrison733 8 місяців тому +2

      People no longer support imperialist wars.

  • @allgood6760
    @allgood6760 6 місяців тому

    Timeless movie 👍🎥✈️

  • @gezman65
    @gezman65 4 місяці тому +2

    We had the finger of three at the time in fighter formation. The Germans with their 'four' were far more effective.

  • @davegeisler7802
    @davegeisler7802 Рік тому +1

    Though it was always cool that their was Sargeant Pilots in the RAF 🇬🇧

  • @kaneda7368
    @kaneda7368 Рік тому

    Christopher Nolan definitely made nods to this movie in Dunkirk. Many similar shots that were no doubt inspired by this.

    • @stevetheduck1425
      @stevetheduck1425 10 місяців тому +1

      Michael Caine in both, in Dunkirk, he's on the radios as the leader of the Spitfires.

  • @ashwayn
    @ashwayn 7 місяців тому +3

    Ok i feel for the German air men sorry

  • @evertonporter7887
    @evertonporter7887 Рік тому

    0:33 "We're Red Squad, we can do anything!"

  • @gamerplayzz5973
    @gamerplayzz5973 2 місяці тому

    Spitfire was amazing! Rolls Royce engine and could out manoeuvre a 109 on a hurricane dive

  • @tennysonfordblackbird2087
    @tennysonfordblackbird2087 Рік тому +1

    Got the LP of the music from the film.

  • @philipmartin183
    @philipmartin183 Місяць тому

    Yes it sums up Great British and makes us Great

    • @MarkHarrison733
      @MarkHarrison733 Місяць тому +1

      Britain had ceased to be great by the 1930s.

  • @derrickstableford8152
    @derrickstableford8152 Рік тому +2

    It even had Winston from John Wick.

    • @alanhynd7886
      @alanhynd7886 Рік тому +1

      It was back in 1940 when he first heard the lines:
      "Go do what you do best."
      "What's that?"
      "Hunt."

  • @angloaust1575
    @angloaust1575 Рік тому +2

    My mother was a wraf at stanmore
    And biggin she never mentioned
    Much about her time there
    Obviously rather traumatic!

    • @raypurchase801
      @raypurchase801 11 місяців тому

      The scene in the movie, about a direct hit on a slit-trench full of WAAFs, really happened.

  • @yamato-yosoroku-klausketeer
    @yamato-yosoroku-klausketeer 3 місяці тому +1

    ロバート・ショウの声が好き!

  • @loudonbands6296
    @loudonbands6296 Рік тому +2

    Very authentic, except for the old pilots.

    • @raypurchase801
      @raypurchase801 Рік тому +5

      True, but if you look at photos of the aircrew taken in WW2, they often looked much older than their years. Heavy strain, the risk of death, being woken at 3am to be ready for 6am raids and a barely-adequate diet will do that to you.

  • @shanecollis4207
    @shanecollis4207 Рік тому

    What is the music from right at the end of the video?

  • @andrewheard3099
    @andrewheard3099 4 місяці тому +1

    Dakka Dakka Dakka

  • @puniopenetrante
    @puniopenetrante Рік тому +5

    How in Jesus's green land they made aerial sequences like this?

    • @oldgoat142
      @oldgoat142 Рік тому +3

      With a helluva lot of work and a helluva lot of pre-planning down to the smallest detail.

    • @ronsmyth2005
      @ronsmyth2005 8 місяців тому

      Experienced pilots.

  • @robbiethepict2783
    @robbiethepict2783 3 місяці тому +1

    The Few.

  • @davidlloyd3116
    @davidlloyd3116 10 місяців тому +3

    The whole 9 yards - which refers to the 27 feet of ammunition for each gun on a hurricane or spitfire.

  • @plugzilla9453
    @plugzilla9453 Рік тому +17

    Almost everything worthwhile carries with it some sort of risk, whether it’s starting a new business, whether it’s leaving home, whether it’s getting married, or whether it’s flying into space.

    • @janebrian6300
      @janebrian6300 Рік тому

      You're right, Investing in crypto currency now is the best thing to do especially with the current rise in the market.

    • @veronicablissful6993
      @veronicablissful6993 Рік тому

      But I don't know why people remain poor due to ignorance.

    • @davidginty1244
      @davidginty1244 Рік тому

      When it comes to investing, we want our money to grow with the highest rates of return, and the lowest risk possible. While there are no shortcuts to getting rich, but there are smart ways to go about it.

    • @drydengerrard6431
      @drydengerrard6431 Рік тому

      Cypto is risky as many would say but I think the actual risk in it the fear of not Investing.

    • @barcicada
      @barcicada Рік тому

      Are you serious? Fighting for freedom and giving your life is not the same as what you just said. Guessing you never served in the military, you just sat back and let others do it for you. My friend you are a coward!!!!!!

  • @colderwar
    @colderwar 5 місяців тому +1

    GET OUT ANDY, JUMP !!!!

  • @shahrookhshroff3018
    @shahrookhshroff3018 Рік тому +3

    When a heavily - laden bomber, albeit flown well by a crew of "Eperten" but equipped with only one effectively operating defensive machine gun tries to evade or fight off a vengeful attack by a more agile enemy fighter firing EIGHT equivalent machine guns, the air battle gets desperate, hopeless and even fatal for the former.
    The tables are turned, though, when their canon - firing escorts join the fray, now "evening out the odds"!

  • @stevec6232
    @stevec6232 Рік тому +2

    Looks like Seven Sisters near Eastbourne? Is that correct?

  • @KarlSturmgewher
    @KarlSturmgewher Рік тому +2

    Top Gun takes the cake, but Battle of Britain, Midway and Blue Max get thumbs ups!

  • @carnalea2424
    @carnalea2424 Місяць тому

    Give me a squadron of Spitfires.

  • @Jay-nq2jl
    @Jay-nq2jl 10 місяців тому +1

    These lads saved the free world…nuff said

  • @aussie6910
    @aussie6910 10 місяців тому +1

    How can you get it wrong when the advisers were actually there.

  • @DJhuggo
    @DJhuggo Рік тому +2

    Curiosity, the diretor of air batlle in this movie has a anciant German pilot and veteran this batlle! (Sorry mi english fail)

    • @raypurchase801
      @raypurchase801 Рік тому

      Your English is OK!
      Many German and British veterans advised in this movie.

    • @kirkp7470
      @kirkp7470 Рік тому +1

      @@raypurchase801 ...and they were not old in 1969! Maybe 46-60 years old.

    • @raypurchase801
      @raypurchase801 Рік тому

      @@kirkp7470 It was intended to invite the South African ace "Sailor" Malan, but he was very ill and couldn't come. The special edition DVD has lots of interesting commentary. The person wearing the white jacket in the Luftwaffe mess scenes was himself a veteran of the Battle. He was an advisor and was given a walk-on part.

  • @piglex1
    @piglex1 2 місяці тому

    Great movie, except they all forgot to wear parachutes!

  • @jean-louislalonde6070
    @jean-louislalonde6070 Рік тому

    Schnell! Raus! Jawhol!

  • @wojciechkopacz7556
    @wojciechkopacz7556 Місяць тому

    Miłość żąda ofiary. W rocznicę wybuchu II wojny światowej. Gazeta Roland Historia. Polecam.

  • @stevethomas5849
    @stevethomas5849 Рік тому

    Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Rhodesia, South Africa,. Jamaica, Free French, Czechoslovakia and Poland 303 Squadron were very much involved as the few
    US volunteers the RAF Eagle Squadron were up in the sky's over Kent against their governments neutrality.

    • @dalj4362
      @dalj4362 Рік тому +1

      Yes, big thanks to the.
      126 New Zealanders
      98 Canadians
      33 Australians
      25 South Africans
      145 Polish
      88 Czechs
      10 Irish
      11 Americans (US)
      2,345 British
      We thank them all.

    • @thevillaaston7811
      @thevillaaston7811 10 місяців тому

      There were no Eagle Squadrons in the Battle of Britain.

    • @JamesRichards-mj9kw
      @JamesRichards-mj9kw 10 місяців тому +1

      South Africa should have remained neutral.

    • @cpj93070
      @cpj93070 7 місяців тому

      @@JamesRichards-mj9kw Shut up Na*i boy.

    • @daneelolivaw602
      @daneelolivaw602 6 місяців тому

      @@dalj4362
      You forgot to mention a few countries and their brave pilots, who also fought in the BoB.
      Barbados 1
      Belgium 28
      France 13
      Jamaica 1
      Newfoundland 1
      Rhodesia 3
      God bless every single one of them.

  • @robertotamesis1783
    @robertotamesis1783 Рік тому +2

    The problem of using in-line engines is that one shot in the engine manifolds can virtual stop the plane. Unlike radial , one shot in the one radical cylinders won't be effective.

    • @jjsmallpiece9234
      @jjsmallpiece9234 Рік тому +2

      Radial engines have too large a cross section, so cause too much drag, Hence why most piston engine aircraft were water cooled in-line engines

    • @colinbarron4
      @colinbarron4 Рік тому +3

      The weakness of a liquid - cooled engine like the RR Merlin is that even a single bullet anywhere in the cooling system can cause the engine to overheat and seize.

    • @raypurchase801
      @raypurchase801 11 місяців тому +1

      @@colinbarron4 All true. The USAAF preferred Thunderbolts to Mustangs for ground-strafing in '44 and '45,. Mustangs had vulnerable cooling systems and many were lost.

  • @TheTimelord62
    @TheTimelord62 10 місяців тому

    The statement is wrong here, the fighters were actually mostly Hawker Hurricanes.

    • @Fordnan
      @Fordnan 10 місяців тому +1

      Mostly, but not solely.

  • @christianc1769
    @christianc1769 Рік тому

    Anyone else realize how much this feels like the death star space battle from Star Wars: A New Hope at points?I wonder if George Lucas was inspired by this

    • @raypurchase801
      @raypurchase801 11 місяців тому +3

      Nah, but I expect Lucas watched "633 Squadron" and "The Dambusters".

    • @andrewjones5513
      @andrewjones5513 9 місяців тому

      It’s a know fact the attack on the Death Star is based on 633 squadron @@raypurchase801

  • @tomhenry897
    @tomhenry897 Рік тому +1

    Wonder How many forgot to pull the rip cord

    • @richardsimpson3792
      @richardsimpson3792 Рік тому +1

      Slightly under 50% of British fighter pilots in the Battle survived a shoot-down, and most of those did manage to return to action.
      Sportingly, the German's didn't shoot parachuting British pilots very often. And the British, under orders of Winston Churchill, weren't allowed to shoot parachuting Germans...the argument was they would be captured anyway..and the British then put them in a very agreeable stately home hotel where they happily chatted away to each other about the merits of the various tactics used, the performance of the different aircraft etc unaware that everything was recorded!

    • @raypurchase801
      @raypurchase801 Рік тому

      @@richardsimpson3792 A similar discussion took place in the Luftwaffe a couple of years later.
      The aircrew and commanders all agreed they wouldn't shoot a man in a parachute.

  • @jjsmallpiece9234
    @jjsmallpiece9234 Рік тому +1

    Per ardua ad astra

  • @rafaeldonosoparedes
    @rafaeldonosoparedes Рік тому

    This film was made on Spain. Without the old Heinkels 111 and Me 109 od the civil este of Spain was imposible of filmer

  • @Elcore
    @Elcore Рік тому

    Were the frames of the Spitfire crashing into the sea at 2:50 cut or am I experiencing the Mandela effect?

    • @robharris8844U
      @robharris8844U Рік тому +1

      I think that cut is as it is in the movie - they used that sort of cut a number of times, as obviously they could not actually crash them - smoke flare then the plane would go out of shot of the camera and scene cut to another scene. Crashes seen from above at distance were plane models so the camera did not dwell on the scene as it would effect excitement and that it was a model would become evident.

    • @plymouth5714
      @plymouth5714 Рік тому +1

      This scene takes place about half way through the film, the scene of the Spitfire going all the way down to the beach was, I think in the final climactic battle towards the end just before the final scenes of the RAF pilots waiting around for the enemy who weren't coming after the invasion was called off.

    • @Elcore
      @Elcore Рік тому

      @@plymouth5714 Ah, that makes sense; knew I'd seen it somewhere. Thanks.

    • @robharris8844U
      @robharris8844U Рік тому

      @@plymouth5714 Yes, and you can unfortunately tell it is a mock-up of plywood and balsa wood- notice the edit quickly from the scene. It adds to the excitement though.

    • @kirkp7470
      @kirkp7470 Рік тому

      @@robharris8844U There were MANY models in the film. I enjoy the paper fighters on the ground blowing up! You see several 'wrinkled' planes on the ground...paper and wood...

  • @user-jy4fc2pm3m
    @user-jy4fc2pm3m 7 місяців тому

    実際には英国空軍はパイロットが足らず、ポーランドなどからパイロットを調達した模様。

  • @ludogayko2512
    @ludogayko2512 2 місяці тому +1

    The 109 sounds better in real life

  • @obsidianfury5133
    @obsidianfury5133 4 місяці тому +1

    1:20

  • @Yummers_310
    @Yummers_310 Місяць тому +1

    GET OUT ANDY JUMP!!!

  • @rovercoupe7104
    @rovercoupe7104 Місяць тому

    If only the Luftwaffe crews knew for what they were fighting. M

  • @katyevans5658
    @katyevans5658 5 місяців тому +4

    Sad thing is ...these guys were real men ...the country survived because of these guys and the troops on ground ..epic people..now wat about today ...pathetic culture ...my god .. no comparison ❤

  • @superflyguy4488
    @superflyguy4488 5 місяців тому

    CGI looks amazing, they actually look like proper old peoples aircraft.

    • @Armadacon
      @Armadacon Місяць тому +1

      Sorry. No CGI in 1969. They had to use real aircraft instead.

    • @superflyguy4488
      @superflyguy4488 Місяць тому

      @@Armadacon You didnt get i was being ironic?

    • @Armadacon
      @Armadacon Місяць тому

      @@superflyguy4488 It would've been ironic if the movie was made a few years ago. As the the movie was released in 1969. The irony fell flat on its face.

    • @superflyguy4488
      @superflyguy4488 Місяць тому

      @@Armadacon You dont have children do you, maybe thats why you dont get it.

    • @Armadacon
      @Armadacon Місяць тому +1

      @@superflyguy4488 I saw this movie in a Cinema when it come out in 1969. What is there to get? As for children. Where do they figure in the equation?

  • @arthurdirindinjr1792
    @arthurdirindinjr1792 9 місяців тому

    Kinda impossible to beat the 8 .50 cals of the P-47 Thunderbolt
    Beat TLS out of a couple of 20mm and two .303 Mgs of the Spifire

    • @billb207
      @billb207 8 місяців тому +1

      Didn't exist in 1940.

    • @walterkronkitesleftshoe6684
      @walterkronkitesleftshoe6684 7 місяців тому

      Yet ANOTHER clueless yankee commenter who thinks they won WW2 alone. Listen Cletus, at the time that the RAF were fielding fighters with 8x .303 brownings, the USAAF were pootling about the skies with the P40 Warhawk, which at the time carried two light barrelled .50 cals and two .30 or .303 cals.
      Give over with your Yankee BS, in 1940 the RAF would have wiped the USAAF from the skies.

  • @benquinneyiii7941
    @benquinneyiii7941 10 місяців тому

    Essex
    Nimitz

  • @user-sg7ct2yy3e
    @user-sg7ct2yy3e Місяць тому

    Not sure if true or not 400 gallons of fuel a hour

  • @Greggee100
    @Greggee100 10 місяців тому

    captain from Jaws?
    I thought spitfire could take
    more hits before going down
    because it was a heavy fighter

    • @stevetheduck1425
      @stevetheduck1425 10 місяців тому +1

      The Spitfire then was an interceptor.
      Later marks (models) could carry bombs, had larger cannon weapons, and the last Spitfires were more than twice as powerful and twice as heavy, and could take on many roles.
      At the time of the Battle of Britain (mid 1940 to that winter), it had eight .303 machine guns and flew short sorties to intercept and attack bomber formations, up to five times a day.

    • @Greggee100
      @Greggee100 10 місяців тому

      thanxs

  • @Hendo56
    @Hendo56 10 місяців тому

    "Sailor" Malan ("Skipper") said he would sometimes let one go- shot up and smoking- to help demoralize the staff back at the German aerodromes.

  • @ScoutSniper3124
    @ScoutSniper3124 10 місяців тому

    German bombers were designed to be as fast or faster than the fighters of their day. Unfortunately for them, the fighters continued to gain in speed, and by the time bombers such as the Heinkel He 111 came into service they were outpaced by the Spitfires and Hurricanes.
    German design relied on that speed to negate the need for fighter escort, and also to minimize the need for defensive armament such as in the heavy bombers of the Allies (Lancasters & Flying Fortresses). This forced the Germans into a series of compromises trying to hold to the original design, while adding machineguns in defense.
    The outcome was fleets of bombers that did neither job (bombing nor defending themselves) well. Proof is in their defeat during the Battle of Britain, which on paper at the outset seemed unthinkable.

    • @JamesRichards-mj9kw
      @JamesRichards-mj9kw 9 місяців тому +2

      Germany did not lose the battle.

    • @denneledoe873
      @denneledoe873 6 місяців тому

      @@JamesRichards-mj9kw uh huh, and how did operation sea lion fare?

    • @JamesRichards-mj9kw
      @JamesRichards-mj9kw 6 місяців тому

      @@denneledoe873 Sea Lion was a deliberate bluiff while the Axis prepared for Barbarossa, as Galland and von Rundstedt confirmed in July 1940.