Yes A is entitled to get compensated by B it he’s saving his property under section 69 provision of this act (quasi contract) because he’s entitled to get compensated by right or law which is already enforced and he is entitled to recieve money on his behalf from B because he saved his property neither there’s is contract nor agreement but in quasi he can do for which is entitled to be compensated in anyways by B. Thankyou for wonderful explanation ❤
Nice explanation of the concepts. A has done a non-gratuitous act which when B enjoys (I.e. accepting the acts of A in firefighting), B is bound to make compensation to B for his act as per Sec-70, Quasi contract
According to section 69 of indian contract act 1872, states that payment by the interested person which means that A has the right to be reimbursed from B as he saved his property.
Thank you so much sr ji God bless you abundantly 😇 Because your all videos is very helpful even i understand easily Your teaching is very good 😊 Again thank you so much sr
Yes, A is entitled to take compensation from B. On behalf of quasi contract.. As here is consideration Enforceable by law..... Thankuhhh sir for explaining the quasi contract in a best manner.....😊😍
Explained in a very well manner .after watching this video it has become easy to learn Nd understand.Thank you so much Sr.love from Pakistan ❤️. A can't demand compensation from Bfor the protection of A's house because here the expenses of A are zero Nd further its his *duty to take care*.so he did this duty which he is bound to do by law.
Sir ka koi jawabb nhiii mtlvv mai kya hi boluu😭tysmm sirr aapko bhgwan aapke mehnat ka fal dey just becoz uhh deserve this..mai bta nhii sktii ki maine aapke padhai se kch samjha hh tysmm sir meri dill se nikli h duaa aapke liye zarror puri hogii...🙏🏻😘
Yes he is entitled Because B are interested in A, s property and competition. B spend his power to put out the fire so he is entitled to earn competition
Thanks for sharing! Just a quick off-topic question: I have USDT in my OKX wallet and I have the recovery phrase. 「pride」-「pole」-「obtain」-「together」-「second」-「when」-「future」-「mask」-「review」-「nature」-「potato」-「bulb」. What is the best way to transfer them to Binance?
@@LawGuruOfficial@KaanoonKiRoshniMeins ir maine ek building ka kaam kiya hu. jiska kaam tha unke ghar k ek relative (bade) ne mere saath contract me sign kare the ki kya kya kaam hoga pura detail me. par jab kaam pura hogya toh jinka kaam tha woh bolre hai ki humko contract kisi ne pehle dikhaya nhi aur paiso k hisab se bhot Kam ka kaam hua toh paise refund mangre hai toh. jo mera agreement hua tha unke relative k saath jisme dono ki sign hai woh valid hai ki nahi???
Every contract is an agreement, but every agreement is not always a contract. An agreement creating a legal obligation is said to be enforceable by law. The parties to an agreement must be bound to perform their promises and in case of default by either of them, must intend to sue. For an agreement to be enforceable by law there should be legal obligation instead of social, moral or religious obligation.
Yes, he can take compensation from B because according to seaction 70. he lawfully done something for B and B taked advantage from A act because his property is saved from the act of B. Important thing is that B done this act to take compensation for it's act. He don't done this act gratuitously. His intention is no gratuitously.
Section 69 says A person who is interested in the payment of money which another is bound by law to pay., and who therefore pays it is entitled to be reimbursed by other.
Yes A was entitle to get compensation because he save the thing of B.,no matters intention without intention of A because fire is accidentally brune in house
Depend krta h wo kis reason se compansation mag raha hai. Agr uski property bachane me kuch kharch aya hai to use uska compensation milega. Baki agr use personally kuch harm hua to wo claim nahi kr skta. This is my personal conclusion
Yes. Mr. A can took compensation. According to section 25(2) of the Indian contract act 1872 The following terms have been fulfilled by Mr.A 1.) Mr. A has rendered thier services voluntarily 2.)Mr. A has rendered services for Mr.B i.e for the promisor 3.)Mr.A has rendered services in the presences of Mr.B 4.) Mr. A has intented to compensate thier services with award. Thank you sir for clear my problem 😀
A is not entitled to pay compensation by B. Because it is kind of help, which is arise sudden A could not bound to be for compensation. Because there is no consideration or no enforcement in that example.
As there was no expense made by A. I think A cannot claim compensation from B, A intentionally save B's property for getting compensation if A spent or sacrifice anything for saving his property then A would be eligible for claiming compensation from B If I be wrong then please correct me who have better knowledge
@@LawGuruOfficial schiiii sir thanks million's to YOU 🙏 aapki video's ne bhut jyda hlp ki h Meri, 27 ko mera exam h Aapki wjh se अच्छा hi jaayega Bhagwaan ji aapko aur aapki fmly ko sda खुश रखे❤️
@@rashmi4567 Thank you so much apki duao ke liye, ham mehnat kar ke videos banate hai or ap logo ko samjh me aa jae or acchi lage to hamari mehnat wasool ho jati hai, thank you for this. exam kesa gaya jarur batae.
Yes A is entitled to get compensated by B it he’s saving his property under section 69 provision of this act (quasi contract) because he’s entitled to get compensated by right or law which is already enforced and he is entitled to recieve money on his behalf from B because he saved his property neither there’s is contract nor agreement but in quasi he can do for which is entitled to be compensated in anyways by B.
Thankyou for wonderful explanation ❤
Very good keep going.
Yes
Nice explanation of the concepts.
A has done a non-gratuitous act which when B enjoys (I.e. accepting the acts of A in firefighting), B is bound to make compensation to B for his act as per Sec-70, Quasi contract
*B is bound to make compensation to A
i think sec 71 @@newoneization
@@sarthaksingh7271noo that's sec 70 only
Your way of Explanation is really amazing and supportive not to understand but also for exams.
Thank you so much for your appreciation.
According to section 69 of indian contract act 1872, states that payment by the interested person which means that A has the right to be reimbursed from B as he saved his property.
Very good
But I have a question.
There must be communication between both the parties.
Case - Laxman vs Gowri Dutt.
Then how can he claim for compensation?
@@Kohale_P ISME ACCEPTENCE AUR PROMISE NHI HOTE quasai contract hai ye
@@devoid1740okhh thnku soo much , toh mtlb b bound h compensate krne ke liye ??
Sir aap bhut ache se pdhate h well done sir 👍👍👍 mujhe ache se smj AA gya 🙏🙏
Thank you
Don't add the background music
Thanks for your suggestion.
Bhai maza aa rha but sun ne mai, acha sound kr rha ❤
@@adityavishwakarma3402 nacho firr
@@adityavishwakarma3402sir koi tips Semester-3 exams ke liye ?
@@protagonist5382 are bhaii tm 🤣🤣😂
Thnx uh sir .. uh explain so wonderful nd clear.. everything goes in my head nd ur notes are very much helpful 👍😇
Thank you so much for your appreciation.
😊🤔
Hy
🤗
Uh😂😮
Answer of the your last question is section 69
Because A was interested in b's property ....for this a helped b 🙂
Very good keep it up
@@LawGuruOfficial Thank you sir... 😁
@@anayustatusworld2925 Your welcome
थैंक्स ब्रो अध्यापक ने पढ़ाया था मगर अच्छे से समझ में नहीं आया था आपने सब समझा दिया!👍🏼
Thank you so much sr ji
God bless you abundantly 😇
Because your all videos is very helpful even i understand easily
Your teaching is very good 😊
Again thank you so much sr
Thank you so much for your appreciation and god bless you too.
Yes, A is entitled to take compensation from B.
On behalf of quasi contract..
As here is consideration
Enforceable by law.....
Thankuhhh sir for explaining the quasi contract in a best manner.....😊😍
Thank you so much for your appreciation.
Is this answer is correct 🤔
@@LawGuruOfficial sir is this answer correct I don't think it is
No because there in no interest of A.
How nice you!❤
Sir thank you..I looking you videos coz of ur wonderful explanation..and moreover for the notes you provided
Thank you so much for your appreciation.
Explained in a very well manner .after watching this video it has become easy to learn Nd understand.Thank you so much Sr.love from Pakistan ❤️.
A can't demand compensation from Bfor the protection of A's house because here the expenses of A are zero Nd further its his *duty to take care*.so he did this duty which he is bound to do by law.
Thank you so much for your appreciation,
And very good for your answer keep going all the best.
But sir answer is not correct
@@LawGuruOfficial k
@@happykumarsingh9822yess
Sir ka koi jawabb nhiii mtlvv mai kya hi boluu😭tysmm sirr aapko bhgwan aapke mehnat ka fal dey just becoz uhh deserve this..mai bta nhii sktii ki maine aapke padhai se kch samjha hh tysmm sir meri dill se nikli h duaa aapke liye zarror puri hogii...🙏🏻😘
Thank you so much.
Ap logo ki duae or support milta rahe bas or kuch nahi chahiye.
or apka bohot bohot thank you hmare lie dua karne ke lie.
Sir your explanation is just awesome thank you for making the topic easy
Thank you so much for your appreciation.
Very useful video, thanks❤❤ sir
Thank you so much
Very well explained...THANKING YOU SIR for your valuable effort 🙏
Thank you so much for your appreciation.
Very nice and simple to understand
Thank you so much
Thank you sir for this video 🎉🎉🎉🎉😊😊it is very helpful 🎉🎉
Your welcome
Sir ap full series upload kriye ...ap bhut awesome explain krte ho
Ha ham dheere dheere cover kar rahe hai puri series.
Kb tha exam apkaa
@@sachinkumar-ms7ww Ap kya puchna chahte hai?
@@LawGuruOfficial sir can you please upload breach of contract and it's remedies and performance of contract
@@sachinkumar-ms7ww Sure we will upload soon.
Yes he is entitled
Because B are interested in A, s property and competition. B spend his power to put out the fire so he is entitled to earn competition
good keep it up
Nice videos❤❤❤❤
Thank you so much
Very well and softely explained.
Stay blessed
Thank you so much
Very well explained sir..... 🥰🥰
Thank you so much
A is entitled to make compensation from b
Based on Quasi contract law sec 71
Thank you sir
Your welcome
A is entitled to take compensation from B.. According to Quasi contract
Thanks
Well explained ♥️🇵🇰
very good keep it up and thank you so much
Very helpful keep going will definitely share and support .Good content
Thank you so much.
Thanks for sharing! Just a quick off-topic question: I have USDT in my OKX wallet and I have the recovery phrase. 「pride」-「pole」-「obtain」-「together」-「second」-「when」-「future」-「mask」-「review」-「nature」-「potato」-「bulb」. What is the best way to transfer them to Binance?
Sir you explain very nicely and the notes are too good
Thank you so much sir
Your welcome
Excellent erudite lecture. 🎉
Thank you so much
Sir love you your teaching skills is exilant ❤️
Thank you
Thanks You so much sir for simple and smooth Explanation 🙂
Your welcome
Thanks mere bhai 😊
Your welcome
Thanks sir it's really helpful for me 😍🙏
Your welcome
@@LawGuruOfficial@KaanoonKiRoshniMeins ir maine ek building ka kaam kiya hu. jiska kaam tha unke ghar k ek relative (bade) ne mere saath contract me sign kare the ki kya kya kaam hoga pura detail me. par jab kaam pura hogya toh jinka kaam tha woh bolre hai ki humko contract kisi ne pehle dikhaya nhi aur paiso k hisab se bhot Kam ka kaam hua toh paise refund mangre hai toh. jo mera agreement hua tha unke relative k saath jisme dono ki sign hai woh valid hai ki nahi???
@@mohitsurpam8641 Dono ke kin kin ke sign hai?
Jinka kam kiya tha unke sign hai?
@@LawGuruOfficial jinka Ghar hai unka uncle tha
@@mohitsurpam8641 Jiska kam kiya usko contract ka pta tha?
ye kese proof kroge ki unko pta tha or wo uncle kya bol rhe h ab?
Your example are 🔥🔥🔥
Thank you so much
Nice concept delivered 🎉
Thank you so much
Sir well explained.... boht boht dhanyawad.......
Shukriya
Thank you so much very good explaining 🙏
Your welcome
Sir detailed video shot kijiye naa🥺
Aap bhut badhiya padhate hoo
Theek hai karte hai
Every contract is an agreement, but every agreement is not always a contract. An agreement creating a legal obligation is said to be enforceable by law. The parties to an agreement must be bound to perform their promises and in case of default by either of them, must intend to sue. For an agreement to be enforceable by law there should be legal obligation instead of social, moral or religious obligation.
The lecture was extremely helpful, Thank you but I found the background music very annoying. It somehow breaks the concentration.
Sorry for disturbance and we have stopped using background music now.
Yes A is entitled to take compensation from B because B was interested in his property
Very good
So good very nice man i prefect understand
Thank you so much
Behtareen👍👍
Shukriya
Very well explanation.
Thank you sir for making this topic so easy.
Your welcome, hope you understood it.
Thank you sir ☺Well explained 💯🤗
Your welcome
Nicely explained 🤗 lecture
Thank you so much.
Your way of explain so good
Thank you so much for your appreciation
Very well explained, thanks🙏🙏
Your welcome
Yes A is entitled to take compunsation to b
It is a quasi contract
Sec 70 no proposal no acceptance
Non graticious act
very good keep it up
Great Video Sir..👍💫
Thank you
Explained in a easy way...
Thank you
Sir u r great ur video is very helpful 🥰
Thank you so much
Very nice you explain the topic thanku so mch for 🤗👌🏻✌🏻
Your welcome
Yes, he can take compensation from B because according to seaction 70. he lawfully done something for B and B taked advantage from A act because his property is saved from the act of B. Important thing is that B done this act to take compensation for it's act. He don't done this act gratuitously. His intention is no gratuitously.
Very good keep going.
Thnxs sir for making notes really helpful 👍🙏
Hiiii
Sir your explanation is so amazing❤❤🎉🎉 but you can also put one cases on each section...
Sure we will try to improve our way of explanation.
Section 69 says A person who is interested in the payment of money which another is bound by law to pay., and who therefore pays it is entitled to be reimbursed by other.
exactly
Yes A is entiled to take compensation from because on bhehalf quasi contract As here is consideration enforceable by law
Very good keep it up
Yes because A ko joh bhi expenses hua hai uske property bachne me wo legally entitled(sec.69) hai compensation ke liye
Very good
Thank you sir well explained..♥
Examples are..🔥
Your welcome
Thanku for explain very helpful to the
Your welcome
Thank you sir very helpful for us
Your welcome
Thank you sir explain so wonderful
Your welcome
Good presentation.
Thankyou so much
Super explaination👌👌👌
Your welcome
Very nicely explained 👍
thank you so much.
Great explanation!!
Thank you
Good job
Thank you
Best your teaching skills
Thank you
Yes A was entitle to get compensation because he save the thing of B.,no matters intention without intention of A because fire is accidentally brune in house
Very good keep ii up.
Yes.. A is entitled to get compensation b coz the property of has been saved by A
Very good
Yes sir A is entitled to get his compensation bcoz A is totally saving B's property
Very good keep it up.
Very nice 👌👍👌👍👌👍👌👍👍
Depend krta h wo kis reason se compansation mag raha hai.
Agr uski property bachane me kuch kharch aya hai to use uska compensation milega.
Baki agr use personally kuch harm hua to wo claim nahi kr skta.
This is my personal conclusion
He explains every topic in depth....but my problem is with the music backside....it distracted me many times
Sorry for the disturbance but we have removed the background music now. It was used in the starting videos.
Frankly speaking I was so focused that I didn’t knew there was a music in background, noticed after reading your comment
@@harshaldabhade8862 Thank you so much
Please remove back ground sound and music
@@updateinformation8202 okay
It starts at 1:08
Tq
Thank-you So much Sir ji
Your welcome
Yes.
Mr. A can took compensation.
According to section 25(2) of the Indian contract act 1872
The following terms have been fulfilled by Mr.A
1.) Mr. A has rendered thier services voluntarily
2.)Mr. A has rendered services for Mr.B i.e for the promisor
3.)Mr.A has rendered services in the presences of Mr.B
4.) Mr. A has intented to compensate thier services with award.
Thank you sir for clear my problem 😀
Your welcome
Yes as according to 69 he helped I'm because he was interested in compensation or payment of agrrived or B in this case
Very good keep it up.
Nice voice nice explanation
sec 70 because A helps to protect B property because from the very start his intention to get compensation.
Very good.
Well explained 👌🏻😊
Thank you
A is not entitled to pay compensation by B. Because it is kind of help, which is arise sudden A could not bound to be for compensation. Because there is no consideration or no enforcement in that example.
Very good keep it up.
Explanation acha h..but plz dont add background music😊
Thank you so much and we are not using it anymore.
Very helpful video
Thank you
Yes A kd entitled to take compensation from B on behalf of quesi contact as hise is consideration enforceable by law
Very good.
As there was no expense made by A.
I think A cannot claim compensation from B,
A intentionally save B's property for getting compensation if A spent or sacrifice anything for saving his property then A would be eligible for claiming compensation from B
If I be wrong then please correct me who have better knowledge
Section 70 of indian contract act applies.. between A and B
Thank you sir very clear. Easy to understand
Your welcome
Thankyou for such good explanation 😍
your welcome.
great ❤️❤️ sir nicely explained 💯
Thank you so much sir 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
your welcome
@@LawGuruOfficial schiiii sir thanks million's to YOU 🙏 aapki video's ne bhut jyda hlp ki h Meri, 27 ko mera exam h
Aapki wjh se अच्छा hi jaayega
Bhagwaan ji aapko aur aapki fmly ko sda खुश रखे❤️
@@rashmi4567 Thank you so much apki duao ke liye, ham mehnat kar ke videos banate hai or ap logo ko samjh me aa jae or acchi lage to hamari mehnat wasool ho jati hai, thank you for this.
exam kesa gaya jarur batae.
@@LawGuruOfficial mine exam is super duper hit sir...
BhUt hi jydaaaa msttttt rha mera paper tysm sir🙏😊
@@rashmi4567 welcome once again
Thankyou so much♥️
Your welcome
Thank you sir 👍
Your welcome
Thank you Sir
Your welcome
Yes A is entitled to get compensation for B
Very good keep it up.
I want to discuss with you on procedural mandatory provision how may be contact with you to get your expert opinion with ruling if any
You can direct message me on Facebook, Instagram or Whatsapp.
Sir. Bhut acchi video hai
Pr aapne breach of contract explain nhi kr rkha hai pls es pr video bna do
theek hai jaldi hi bana dete hai.
Bhth acha explanation
Thank you
Yes, A is entitle to take compansastion from B..bcz he save his property
Very good