This is very informative. Thanks. When my parents bought their house around 1974-5, they bought it in the knowledge that a developer had acquired the rights to build an estate in place of the woods at the end of the garden. Between my parents' house and the neighbour is a slither of land about 10 feet wide that the developer owned which could have provided access to the estate. Instead, they built an 8 foot high brick wall across the end of the garden and across the end of the 10 foot strip of land. Thus making it unusable for access. The land had been neglected and had been used as a rubbish dump (though this had probably predated the developer's ownership). My dad sealed off the other end of the strip of land, cleared it out, and took down the fence separating the garden from the land (he had previously offered to buy the land from the developer, but had had no reply). He also offered to split the land with the neighbour, but the neighbour was happy for my parents to have the land in its entirety. That was all over 40 years ago and the land has been an integral part of the garden ever since (containing a wildlife pond, a gravelled area and flowerbeds etc). Access to the land is only possible through the back garden. I do not know whether the developer registered the land, but in any case, your video seems to indicate that my mum (my dad has passed away) has a convincing claim to the land.
@@shazman15 Thanks. I had a feeling that not all land needed to be registered with the Land Registry at that time as it dates from a long time ago. Might be worth looking into though.
@@0cgw Yes if the history goes back many years it can be more difficult... I think the Land Registery digital records were maintained from 1993 onwards but still worth a stab, given its easy enough to check.
@@shazman15 I would only do this at a point you are ready to make claim as it will get flagged. To me its no difference to credit check companies once you make activity it becomes awake to others who will then action very quickly especially if they are holding lots of money.
I work for a utility company and see this all the time when big building companies purchase fields from farmers in order to build new housing estate, On a lot of occasions when they turn up to start work they measure their site Boundary lines and discover people have done exactly this, the neighbours next door have extended their garden fences out to occupy more land to in effect land grab to make their property bigger. Because the developers have legally purchased land that is legally registered the 1st thing they do is to rip the offending neighbours fence down and take possession of what is now registered to them. There are also occasions when they turn up where there are sections/strips of land [who’s owners are not obvious at 1st] and you end up with ransom strips. They build the new roads and housing estates only to discover later that someone owns a vital strip on a Boundary or in an awkward area, so in effect you cannot cross over that land to use the new roads to get to the new houses they have built.
More than a quarter of a million households have been abandoned and left empty when I did a quick search I am absolutely gob smacked great video thanks it's definitely food for thought!
We lost a small section of land to a neighbours this way. We allowed the neighbour use of the land to grow a vegetable garden, we were on good terms with them, until they LEGALLY STOLE our land! Please think of the rightful owners before acquiring land this way.
Exactly what happened to my sister in law and her neighbour was a barrister who took her land from her she now suffers anxiety etc and has not worked for 2 years her life living next door to this barrister is a nightmare existence.
@@paulmcgrath3882 I moved out the end of November. There is a lot more to the story, like demanding rent in cash only, and harrasment, so I may have more, I've got video and audio and emails exposing harrassment. I have 6 years to take a case against them. They've already regretted messing with me. It cost them time and more money than if they'd just pay me to leave. I've been renting my whole life and never had a problem with a landlord until now. My new place is nice and quiet, landlord are putting a new fibreglass roof on soon weather permitting. It was stressful having a rogue landlord.
Do you still hold the title in your name? or does he? I doubt he "owns" it and is just allowed to continue to occupy it. If he was to sell it, that would be another matter and I doubt that he would benefit at a point of sale.
I read an example of this a few years back when some one Put up a semi permanent tent on a piece of ancient woodland that was overlooked during dealing with a deceased's estate. They put the tent up and lived in it, practiced forest husbandry, fenced the land and maintained it. They documented the whole process. Since none of the inheritors were aware they needed to look at the land it was apparently an easy case to prove. I wish I could remember the details then I could put up more information.
Great explanation. My father fenced off a piece of unadopted land back in the 60s. He was able to get planning permission 25 years later and deeds to his chalet bungalow that he built. Some neighbours had already fenced off part of the land so he decided to get the rest. First come, first served!!
That’s interesting cos I know of a person who moved in 90. Bit of land beside her house. A few years ago she decided to fence it for her use. Residents association complained to local authority. Took her to court. She maintained that piece of land for 29 years. Investigation of the land states that it belongs to developers. In the planning doc.. it states that piece of land has to stay as common land. Local authority and developer has never maintained it. She’s now trying to get adverse possession.
@@stephaniesamra7960 ok, that's also interesting. The land my father had was on an unadopted lane at the bottom of his garden. The lane is still unadopted, ie the council do not upkeep the surface.
@@janetharrod2750 But if someone has rights to pass and repass over that lane they can potentially apply to have the "obstruction" removed. Rights of way do not extinguish through lack of use.
My nice neighbour moved in & decided he was moving the boundary 2m in his benefit just on the day he new my Mrs was in hospital having a miscarriage due to the stress he’s caused. He’s trying adverse possession. Problem with boundary’s is they are only accurate to 2m in the countryside. He did exactly the same at another house he owns. He’s had a dodgy surveyor put measurements on his deeds to suit. He got away with it last time. I’d maintained this land for several years had chickens on it & his shed was the boundary for 30 yrs previously. He needs a 2m fire break for insurance purposes as he runs a business from the shed. That’s why he desperately needs it. This has been reported to land registry & I even issued him with a letter before he bought the place advising of this dispute. But he still went ahead. So I’ve lost 2m x400m of my garden. Some people🙄 I’m sure I’ll have the last laugh though one way or another.
Interesting videos.👍 There are a few US based legal channels I follow (there are enough similarities to our legal maxims to make them interesting), but few UK based legal channels. So I appreciate your time & effort in doing these.
Thanks, this has been very informative. I'm sure you don't want to get stuck in the groove of property rights but perhaps sometime in the future you could explain how compulsory purchase orders are a thing and why they're so hard to fight.
Because the crown actually owns all the land anyway and the legal paperwork is just formalities, if the government want the land they'll be working in the interests of the Crown so anything they say goes? Also the monarchy isn't the crown.. Go figure
@@ryanalexander3088 It’s all under the Catholic Church, check which crown she stuck on her head. I’ve never seen so much fraud in my life and we are all apart of it.
Our family purchased and registered a property in 1998. In subsequent years we applied for and received an additional copy of our registered titlefor our records. However, we noticed that someone (not disclosed) was claiming a small piece of unfenced land adjoining our driveway and the highway. I wrote a letter to Land Registry stating we own the land, according to title, and disputed any claim otherwise. Further, we questioned as to why Land Registry had NOT NOTIFIED us of any claim being made as they are required to do. You guessed it NO RESPONSE!
I wonder if you would be kind enough to shed some light on my situation (pun intended). I have factual possession of a small parcel of land that is in the main the site of my garden shed. The timeframe is post LR Act 2002 and predates my purchase of the house and adjoining land. It is registered, however, I understand that the use classification is either B2 or quite possibly B8 as it was a lumberyard. The yard has been developed as residential in a piecemeal fashion over the years all except this small parcel, which is only accessible via my property or via a wade across a millpond. I think I'm ticking all of the boxes but it would be great to have an expert opinion and even better if it is free.
@@runswithcows Have a read here www.gov.uk/government/publications/adverse-possession-of-1-unregistered-land-and-2-registered-land and www.gov.uk/government/publications/adverse-possession-of-registered-land/practice-guide-4-adverse-possession-of-registered-land
@@grahamallison6704 That's really helpful, many thanks. Bit odd thinking of myself as a squatter but in this instance that's exactly what I am. It was the BlackBeltBarrister's comment that excluded residential property that made me question my understanding of my ability to acquire the land by adverse possession. The only area that remains unclear is whether the period of factual possession is reset when the ownership of the adjoining property and land is transferred. I'll have a thorough read through.
My garden ascends sharply on very soft ground from my house, and it continually has eroded back since the property and adjacent property has existed. The result is that the "property line" as originally drawn is now on a high vertical subsidence, impractical and valueless to all. A similar condition exists along the row of my neighbours.The property owner at the top of my garden asked if she could fence across the top for safety and I agreed that it was a good idea. I assume that the placing of the fence puts me in possession of what is actually a liability! (I'm not complaining!)
It's not a loop hole it's put in place to stop people hoarding land and letting it get overgrown and go to waste without a single bit of maintenance, if you own land and haven't even been to it in over a decade that's a you problem and you don't deserve to own it. Which is why if someone else uses and maintains the land for that period of time they are entitled to own it.
Ah good video, thanks. I do want to search out a piece of land. Seems the most important thing is to check the land register to see if it has a keeper or not first and foremost.
What a great video. It would be excellent if you could do a separate video on unregistered land. We live on a 30 year old estate which has a 4 metre tree boundary between our garden and a field. This was originally done to hide the estate from view. Nobody has ever maintained the land and a few neighbours “moved in” and fenced off many years ago. I’ve long awaited a knock at the door! It is possible to legally claim title in this sort of situation. Cheers.
Very interesting. In the USA however, whoever pays the yearly property taxes on a piece of land, retains ownership of that land no matter who else uses it. Once the tax goes unpaid, anyone can pay the tax instead and if seven years goes by like that, the person who has paid that tax becomes the new owner. OR, if the taxes go unpaid for one year, the property will go up for a tax sale and someone can buy the rights to it, though in some states the original owner has six months or so to redeem it by paying that tax.
@@dgnash The only downside is, a lot of people lose their property because of our property tax laws. In areas that have a property tax (not all areas of the USA do) the state essentially owns your land, and rents it to you, typically for 1% of its value every year. So if your home and land is valued at say, $300,000 USD, that 'tax/rent' would be $3,000 you have to pay to the state every year. Don't pay and the property goes up for tax sale, often only for the amount of tax that has not been paid. So what happens fairly often is the person who was responsible for paying the tax, dies and the people left behind don't pay the next years payment since they've never had to deal with it before, and the property ends up in a tax sale, is sold, and those people, often a spouse, is kicked out with nothing.
@@dgnash Buy land from the state? Not exactly. You buy from private sellers. But the state is a sort of landlord that charges everyone yearly rent. Once you buy land or any property, it's generally yours to do with as you wish, though in many areas you have to deal with local building codes, permits, etc that limit what you can build or actually do with your land or buildings on that land. If you don't pay the state their yearly 'tax', they sell your property for the amount of tax that is owed. The state never keeps property for itself or tries to sell that property for a profit. It's all to get the taxes. So if you want to buy a house for instance, you buy it from the current owner and pay them. Most people have to borrow money from a bank to do this, so the bank holds the title to the house until the loan is paid off, usually in monthly installments. So the average person has to pay on their bank loan every month, as well as a yearly tax for the property to the state. Once the bank loan is paid off, they still have to pay their property tax every year or lose the rights to that property.
@@dgnash Interesting. The 'Council tax' does sound similar to our 'property tax'. But here in the USA, they don't bother taking you to court over the unpaid tax. They do send notices to you via snail mail to pay up or else, and the amount of time you have to pay varies state to state. But if you ignore the warnings, they simply list your property on a tax sale site that is or used to be posted in the local paper as well as on the county court house bulletin board. Though I'm sure there is a website for such stuff these days also. And if the tax goes unpaid past the deadline, it's offered for sale for the amount of tax owed. So some shrewd buyers can get a property worth tens of or hundreds of thousands of USD for a few hundred or thousand dollars of whatever the taxes owed was. Though in many areas, the original owner still has a short window of time to reclaim the property if they can scrape together the taxes owed. Some end up having to sell the property in order to get the money to pay the tax. As for lawyer fees in the USA, they vary. Most people in cases like this, don't need a lawyer and can simply go before a judge and state their case. Sometimes they need to file in a 'small claims' court and usually don't need a lawyer there either. But if they choose to hire a lawyer, they'll pay the lawyer an hourly fee, which is negotiable to a point, or even a fixed amount. The way lawyers make the most money here in the USA is when someone is being sued. In those cases, the person suing usually doesn't have enough money to pay their lawyer, so the lawyer agrees to take 40% of the money won IF the case is won. And nothing if the case is lost.
In California Adverse Possession requires payment of the taxes, the statutory period is 5 years. In the 19th century the Railroads had huge tracts of land granted to them in exchange for building the railroad. They also had a lot of influence in the state government so they prevailed on the legislature to pass the tax requirement since it was difficult to defend all that land from squatters.
About 12 years ago one of my grandmother's then neighbours 'took over' a section of a council-owned car park (they errected a wooden car port over it) and a few years later were apparently able to sell the house with the newly acquired land as part of the estate. I had wondered how this was legally done so thanks for the insight!
@@portcullis5622 Quite true but if what Daniel says is correct then they would have been notified about the attempted possession. They were quick to try to get a small animal sanctuary evicted on the grounds of 'inappropriate and non-permitted use' of arable farmland (the appeal was of course upheld) but I guess when your mates are involved...
@@someonespadre Tell that to the (London?) council who did nothing about squatters living in a large council owned building. They had cut it up into 'apartments' and when the council eventually moved to evict them many had been there for more than 15 years, so it turned out held legal title to their little bit.
@@loc4725 I’m not familiar with your entities…is the council public or private? In US common law AP government land held in its public capacity (such as parks, rivers, ocean, lakes and forest land) can not be adversely possessed but land held in its proprietary capacity (for example a City’s maintenance facility) can be. Some states have statute law which deletes the proprietary exception so no government land can be adversely possessed.
On a similar sort of issue, i have used an access over a piece of land for over 30 years, and previous owners of my property used it for over 40 years prior to that. None of us have ever asked for or been given any permissions, it has just been used. Now the land has recently been sold and the new land owner's say that we can no longer use the access, which not only services my home but also my business. Thank you for any help and please keep up the excellent and very interesting videos.
There is a corner plot within the village which I live close to which was fenced off by a local businessman. The land was I believe common land & lay opposite his business. He has within the past year or so submitted an application to build on that land which the parish council has resisted. The man was for years & may possibly still be a member of that parish council. Does his role within the council & his relationship with other councillors, some who are probably not averse to his planning application prejudice his claim in any way? He now has a locked gate & "private property" signs around the land.
Depending how long that fence was there and how long that neighbor has been taking care of it, technically the neighbor can legally claim it as his property. Its called adverse possession.
@@hens0w You're retrieving your children's ball from your neighbour's back garden. They are not in but have said that they are happy for you to collect it yourself if it goes over the fence. Their neighbour from the other side has just moved in and is unaware of this arrangement and hasn't met you yet and therefore challenges you being there.
Thank you for the very informative video. Helped massively to understand the overall process of obtaining land. I’ve recently started to adversely possess a unregistered small field on the side of a hill overlooking my town, that has been left to overgrow and be dumped on by fly tippers for at least 15 years. This land is accessed by a narrow overgrown track / road which is most likely why it has been left and forgotten about. I’ve asked around the local area and people don’t know who owns / owned the land or when it was last used. I have put up ‘Privet property’ signs with my phone number written on them, located at both of the two entrances to the land. They have been up for over a month now and I’ve not yet had any phone calls. I’ve now began to cut back some of the very overgrown vegetation in the hopes of using the land and registering it in my name 12 years from now. All of these actions that I have taken I have photographed to help provide proof and aid the application. Is there any further actions that you can think of that would aid my case in possessing this land and allow me to determine who owns the land? Thanks for the help!
@@James-co2nb Yeah! I should have said in the previous comment that the land is surrounded by stone and soil walls / banks which have barbed wire above. There’s two entrances from the lane. One which I have tied a big steel gate to the concrete posts either side of the entrance. The other which I have padlocked a chain across from the two concrete posts. I intend on making / buying some gates once the track is drivable.
Another very interesting video; thankyou. I have a suggestion for a Mr and Mrs Cladding of Lawchester own a Leasehold property...............and have recently tried to move properties. However Mrs Cladding has been informed they need an ESW1 form to confirm the property is safe concerning its exterior walls. The couple then receive a bill from the Lanlord for 50,000 pounds to make good the errors that have arisen in the ESW1 report. Please confirm the liability to these costs the couple face and what if anything they can do to avoid these costs. NB: The couple live in a flat within a building under 18 meters tall and so are not eligible for Govt assistance in removing defective cladding and or repair/replace fire prone features.
It is a shame you can't use this to save some historic buildings that are just being abandoned. There are often old buildings that just end up getting acquired by large development companies only for them to go up in flames after the developers encounter any preservation orders on them so they can build some modern stuff there instead. I wouldn't mind owning a nice old church or a small hosp... nah maybe not an abandoned hospital, forget that! An old church on the other hand would make a nice place to live even if it would be expensive to heat the main hall in the winter (I already found a way around that though).
Violence is always overlooked in these prickly circumstances. Those who enjoy the land at a another's expense, must lay in the land and organically recompense.
I know of a house where the owner Lady deceased two years ago. My friend living there as a guest of the Lady has been harassed by dubious characters and threatened in an attempt to get him out. My friend has done numerous checks and found one of these people has a conviction of a property fraud of some kind. The house and estate were intended by the Lady, to be sold and money given to charity but this is not the case here. The Council said he needs an eviction notice before he leaves but none has been forthcoming. Unfortunately my friend was finding it too stressful and moved out. They won.
Interesting. I have a railway line at the bottom of the garden. The old 3 wire fence has long since collapsed. The railway has installed a 'new' 8ft steel fence 3 meters inside of the old boundary fence ( 16 years ago ). This has left 40 Sq meters of land at the top of my garden only accessible via my garden. I use it for storage of compost bins etc. Is this land ripe for Adverse possession?
I wonder, would it make any difference if the owner of the land is a local council and has leased that land to a tenant. For example, there is exists a low rise block of 6 flats, 2 per floor over 3 floors, each of which has a garden. The block is owned, freehold, by the council. Flats 2 through 6 are rented by tenants, flat 1 is owned, leasehold, by the occupier. The gardens for flats 1 and 2 are immediately behind the block so can be accessed via a rear door from the flat as well from a side gate to a common walkway accessed via a door from the shared vestibule of the block. The gardens for the remaining flats are behind those gardens such that the gardens for flats 3 and 5 are behind the garden for flat 1 and those for flats 4 and 6 behind the the garden for flat 2. The only division between the gardens are short concrete posts between which had been strung basic fencing (two pairs of twisted wire with rough wooden staves inserted between them every 6-12 inches). Up until 1 year ago none of the 4 gardens for flats 3 to 6 were maintained by anyone, the duty to maintain the gardens falls to the tenants under the terms of their tenancy but this is not enforced in any meaningful way. As a result all gardens were heavily overgrown with brambles, bindweed &c). Last year the tenant of flat 4 agreed to exchange gardens with the tenant in flat 6 (so their garden was now at the end, the order of gardens went from 3-5-4-6 to 3-5-6-4) and engaged a local builder to clear and level the garden then lay lawn and erect high fences around the garden. As well as doing this the builder laid a concrete path to the garden and erected a simple wooden fence from the common walkway to the gate in the fence for flat 4's garden. As a result the only access to the remaining 3 gardens is via the garden of Flat 1. Suppose the occupant of flat 1 were to cut back the brambles and other weeds in the gardens for flats 3, 5 and 6, and treat the new growth with a systemic weedkiller as a means to prevent growth into their own garden which has been blighting their peaceful enjoyment of their garden since they moved in. If this were kept up long enough, 12+ years, then if I'm understanding this video correctly, there is a strong chance that the occupant of flat 1 would gain adverse possession of the gardens, presumably the freehold.
Our Mortgage offer was pulled as the Lender didn't want us to apply for Adverse Possession post completion regarding a strip of land that crosses the front of the lawn.
I read about this years ago . Which is probably why I never took such actions. It takes too bloody long. Which is a shame. Unlike America . But England is a small country. But best of luck to those in their endeavours
So does thay mean that somebody cant adversely possess a domestic property, even without squatting? What if somebody gained access to a property that is empty, changed the locks, and maintained the land around it for 10 years?
Great bit of advice. liked and subscribed. Could you go,at some point,into more detail on finding unregistered land in Scotland? England has a free map as i understand,is there a way to find land in Scotland without pouring money into the process? Apparently,about 50% of scottish land is unregistered.
@@dgnash Yes use your land or lose it ! If you lost land then you did not go visit for at least 10 years. This law is there so land can be worked not so lazy landowners can just sit on it and do nothing.
Thank you for the spelling correction ☺️ land set aside for wildlife would be tendered and looked after, not abandoned and left for people to dump on. One only has to turn up or check their land once every 10 years to make sure no one is on it.
Sounds like theft to me. Why isn't there a requirement to inform the titled owner of the intention? They could easily be hundreds of miles away and not know of such moves?
IANAL, but surely if they're hundreds of miles away they are demonstrably not using the land. If they are using the land then they'll have an agent of some sort who would, presumably, tell the owner if someone was trying to take adverse possession.
@@merseyviking Its not about occupancy, its about ownership? someone cant smply steal your property because you arent using it? Think of all the epty property ownned by Banks in major cities?
My neighbour replaced his boundary fence to my property and in doing so moved the boundary closer to my house thus giving him more land. He only told me that he was going to replace the fence, he did not ask for permission to move the boundary in his favour. How can I get the fence moved back to its original line?
Well the way I understand the outlined rule, A letter of permission would surface and stop a claim to your land, maybe wrong, sure someone will correct me. In my limited experience all land and right of way issues are civil matters, so unless you can afford representation your screwed.
@@cdl0 That is really bad advice, don't ever do this! You need to take legal advice first, it is very dangerous messing with fences, you can end up with a huge legal bill if you don't do it the correct way.
@@cdl0 I had imo, excellent advice once from someone that took the “legal” route over fence boundary issues, that took years and a lot of stress to resolve… I was facing a similar issue, whereby numerous neighbours of acres I bought were trying to claim “my” land… So I asked him if he had his time again, what would he do?… He replied: “I’d just knock down the fence and let them try to take me to court” So I did just that. And though one neighbour was verbally abusive, none took me to court, so I claimed back what was legally mine.
After being here 17 years and there being a historical boundary hedge between me and a neighbour who’s been there 18 months, the neighbour has cut through and cut down the historical hedge that isn’t owned by either party, erected a huge fence on my land encompassing the boundary hedge claiming he owns both the hedge and my land. I always was told the hedge was mine by the previous owner and was forced to maintain it I never doubted it until the land registry told me neither property owned the boundary. I have contacted the insurance company to instigate legal action and the police as I was threatened with assault. At the moment the police aren’t doing much 🙄. They also created a new walkway into my land leaving me incredibly unsafe to the point I’m scared anyone can get into my land now. I have been assaulted here before. Do you think I have a good case?
Sounds like you live in a nice area. If the land registry says he doesn't own it and he's built on it, I'm sure you have a watertight case. Go spend a bunch of money trying to prove it.
Would you be intetested in a video on aggravated trespass (AT) I hear many things which, I believe, are incorrect about AT, such as 'you have to commit a crime while trespassing for it to be AT', or 'you have to be carrying a weapon for it to be AT'. As I understand it, all that is required is 'a further action' beyond the actual trespass that either obstructs or disrupts the lawful activity on the land, or intimidates others from engaging in lawful activity on the land. That 'further act' can be virtually anything that fits the criteria above. There does not have to a criminal element to the 'further act' , nor need there be a weapon involved. Would be intetested to know if my understanding is right.
@@TheSadButMadLad Those words are not mentioned in relation to Public Order offences. If your actions were threatening, abusive (or insulting for section 4 and 4a) or disorderly, then yes, the method of disruption, obstruction or intimidation could also be a public order offence. But conversely, if you are not threatening, abusive or insulting, or trying to illicit imminent violence, then there would be no public order offence. I guess in some situations you might get charged with both aggravated trespass AND public order offences. Hopefully, he will look at doing a video on this, and educate us.!😀
@@zigzagtoes Bauer & Orrs vs DPP is a good case to look at. Aggravated trespass does require a further act beyond the original trespass. This act has to have the intention of obstructing or disrupting lawful activity on the land, or intimidating other from engaging in a lawful activity on the land. If you can convince a judge that your mere refusal to leave, and continued presence does amount to that, good luck. That would possibly have the effect of criminalising most trespass, something which historically has not been the case in E & W.
@@zigzagtoes Still requires an intent to disrupt etc by the trespasser though, which is harder to prove (depends on the exact circumstances). I do get what you are saying, and ultimately it would be up to a magistrate to decide, but I still feel from looking at other cases there does need to be a separate act beyond mere trespass. Refusing to leave is still just trespass, nothing more.
@@zigzagtoes Again, it may come down to intent. If he entered as a trespasser with the intent of stealing, or doing damage to people or property then it would probably be covered by the Theft Act 1968 (probably section 8, Burglary). If not, his advancing towards you might be construed as intimidating you from conducting your lawful activity on the site (your security role), and therfore be AT. Every case would need to be looked at on it's own merits.
May I ask a question about a land issue? If a pub/restaurant puts tables and chairs outside their property on a public walkway are they breaking the law? A lot of pubs seem to to be doing it nowadays and I believe they have no right to do it as it’s in effect obstruction. Would be curious to know the actual law on that as some businesses seem to be taking up large sections of public thoroughfares for their businesses.
I live in a 1936 bungalow with half acre plot. A year ago a neighbour couple end of the back garden. They live in a 20 yr old house with tiny back garden. Spent a few visits on my door. One was trees blocking light could they have them cut ok i said. But cut too many down going past there next door neighbours. The tree chaps did cut the wood up for my wood burner. Next got letter and photo showing summer house top needed fixing with felt. I said ok thanks then was asked if the fence coming away slightly could be taken down. So they could use the summer house also make a vegetable patch near it. I cant get down very easy i am an amputee wheelchair bound plus had serious brain damage 30 years ago. They go in the summer house sometimes but not any vegetable planting. I feel like having the fence section put back. Could i put the back am confused. There is a 10 inch gap between my fence and the neighbours along the fence. But picture of my damaged fence they sent me in a letter they removed there fence to be able to see and photo. Anyway i wondered what you thought of it i can have it replaced the missing fence restore it back i hope. BlackBeltBarrister .
Thank you for an informative and interesting video. You do not define 'Factual Possession'. I would asume in means in actual possession of, in the present time. Would that preclude an Adverse Possession claim of any land that you are not in actual possession of, but may have had once, say in the years 1968 -1980?
A couple of questions:- What reasonable steps could a title holder take to remove an adverse posessor from their (registered) land during that 10 year period? Also, as the European convention on human rights still applies after Brexit, has it been 'tested in court' in relation to adverse posession of registered land after Britain left the EU? Thanks. Good concise video btw, very informative.
You would have to oust the trespasser by force. A court order would be expensive and take too long. Go to the local gym or nightclub and hire some heavies to persuade the trespasser to leave.
@@fivish Using force to take land that a court could rule is another persons property would not look good to the court. You would also be at risk of a conviction for assault etc.
Legally? Using reasonable force to evict the person yourself with proof that you are the legal title holder to the land or failing that taking them to court to secure an eviction, which you can then refer to bailiffs who will extricate the offender from the property under order of the court. Bear in mind you have 10 years to do this. and lets be honest the basis of adverse possession is based on the "principle of use it or lose it" and the idea that if you weren't using the land enough to notice someone else had taken adverse possession then its a greater loss to the person who's maintained and used the land for the last _ years than the person who has done nothing to stop them.
@@fivish Use force, by all means, but the police would be called, and you would be arrested, and I am sure the Adverse Possessor will then take steps to further secure the land. you need to stop the clock, and that's only achieved through the courts.
Excellent, thank you. Do the same rules apply to Unregistered land ? I assume that they do and the only difference would be that the 65 day notification period to the title owner by the Land Registry would not apply ?
Great video, very informative. Thank you. Could you perhaps tell me what the difference between positive prescription (Scotland) and adverse possession (England, Wales) is please?
We have a garage that we used since 1984. And the owner before 1969 we have maintained the garage and since removed it as a tree had collapsed on it so we fenced it off. This was council land sold to a local housing associations and now has just been sold with other garages. Can we therefore apply this.
1:52 "Residential Premises" What if the building is in such a state of dereliction it would be inhabitable? (Legislation defines residential property as property that is being used as, is suitable for being used as, or is being developed to be used as, a dwelling). However, if it derelict, it could not be legally classed as "being used as, suitable for, or even being developed" With all the way legal professionals use all and every possible nuance's within the English language, how would this stand up in a court?
In 1990 the local council agreed to rent me a piece of land adjacent to my property but never replied to solicitor and I have never paid anything. The land was then apparently transferred. What is my position as to adverse possession please? Thankyou for a timely and informative video
If you have documented anything that can prove your were in possession of the land, then you can try and claim it. the title may have been transferred, however possession was not. It may be worth attempting to get the land put into your name, however it may be risky, due to the land registry act 2002. however as you mentioned you took possession in 1990, so the old rules should still apply.
No one can own land in this country you only have it by title for the sole use until you move it on or you no longer wish to work that piece of land The reason why you don’t own land is simple, The land and the people are one ( and you should understand this ) Common land is what the people can use and acquire for use, and work it for a number of years and then the title is yours Just a thought
You are right. effectively the land as whole is belonging to the crown and as such we the people of that land can only claim title of the estate for a portion of the land.
you can go on the Land Registry portal and look at the mapsearch facility.. it will identify areas of unregistered land - that does not mean that there is not a known unregistered owner of it though.. the only way really that people practically acquire land by adverse possession is for bits of land which adjoin their property - either them or former owners extend the boundaries.
very informative, I am about to attempt my first Adverse Possession in the coming days. What sort of legal protections will I enjoy, my intent is to put up a private land sign with a alt phone number, in the hope that no one calls, but if they do I will instantly drop any attempt. do they have a right to remove signs ?
I'm currently in the process of adversly possessing 2 pieces of land. One has a public footpath crossing it? Are there any legalities I need to watch out for?
Could someone explain in few words? So if there is an abandoned bungalow house not registered in land registry, someone could just move there, repair it start paying taxes and other bills. Then after 12 years he could claim that land as his property and if owner wont say anything on next 65 days, that land will be that guy who's been living there for 12 years?
Hi i have found a piece of land that is in my opinion not being used people have been fly tipping on the land i have done a land check and it belongs to the local council can i put a fence and gate up and use this land ? Thankyou
Wait. Let me get this right. Basically, you are saying if I occupy/use a piece of land without asking for permission, for a set period of time, I can then apply for the land to belong to me?
I wish when I was younger I had a lawyer like you. At the age of 23 I was at a party in a rough area in Glasgow. It was loud and the police were called. On arrival they entered the house and arrested myself and another boy. I was charged with police assault accused of pushing an officer to the chest. For the record I didn't. I now have police assault on my record and I think it's there for life. It affects me getting insurance for my business I'm now nearly 40 years old. Mr black belt are you aware of anyway I could resolve this miscarriage of justice? . I assume I'm just stuck with it but it would be nice if I could correct it one day. Kind regards Ian.
If one was to take physical possession of a house by changing the locks would that person, whilst having adverse possession without full rights to the property have the right to rent the property out?
So I’m summary, even adhering to the laws, and waiting 10 years, the owner can still chuck you off, and has 2 years to do so. Which in my mind makes the whole thing worthless! Imagine spending 10 years living on a lovely piece of countryside, growing your food, settled right in, THEN get spend up to years of sleepless nights and angst ridden days worrying about being kicked off!. No thanks!
Why should taking someone else's land for nothing be simpler? I don't think the law here was designed for people to just set up their home and life on the land and try claim it as their own, that would be very risky and foolish. It's usually used for small patches of land that have poor access or no significant use but could be put to good use by someone else. For example, a few feet of land at the end of your garden or beside a house on an estate etc. These little patches of land are too small to be useful for a developer, but a home owner might enjoy a larger garden or a veg plot etc.
It's curtains. There are dozens of occasions of legal fraud is being committed where thieves take over ownership of properties while the legitimate owners are away.
@@greenpedal370 Yep. A local council intentionally sent legal notices to fictitious addresses (admitted in court later as “oops an admin error!” X 6 different addresses a mistake??- yeah right!) So they could claim my property.
I wonder if anyone knows - there's a spot of unowned land behind our row of houses that people park on. It's also access to a telephone pole. One of the neighbours has built a fence (a week ago; he moved in a few months ago) around it with a sign saying "claimed under adverse possession" so no one can park on it. Obviously this is annoying for the people who usually park on it, as there's very limited space to park otherwise. He's also put a camera up in case people remove the fence. We are quite confused as to what anyone can do? We were all fine with parking on that land first come first serve before 😂
My understanding is that basically he would have to maintain that land for 10 years before he can claim it so pull down the fence and park your car there
It does not sound like owning land in England is that easy either. Sounds like their law also may protect trespassers and people who just want to take your land. Amazing.
Here is an interesting curiosity, whilst trying to find out if the Council did actually own the land adjacent to my allotment plot, I discovered that the lease for the allotments did not cover my plot on the map although I have been and continue to pay rent for the plot to the association who lease the rest of the land. In another years time I will have been on that plot for 10 years. Could I claim register my plot as outright ownership and stop paying rent to the allotment association? Here is the snag with declaring UDI. I would still have to cross the allotment land to gain access to that plot so it might not be a very good idea.
I would doubt it as your paying of rent could be argued to be an admission that you do not hold the land yourself and as such have not been adversely possessing the land. However if the council do not actually hold the title to the land then Its possible you could stop paying the rent and THEN start the adverse possession process from that point and hope that the council doesn't try to retake possession for a new tenant or to claim the land themselves.
I am paper owner of land acquired in the 1970's that was adversely possessed some time before 1980 and is now LR registered to a new owner, no notification was received I guess because LR had no record of my address so no objection was possible, please where do I stand wrt returning land to its rightful owner (me)?
@stupid bloke land is like brains or muscles. If you don't use it you lose it. The user is now the rightful owner. Your paper and imagined ownership is now fictional.
@@srspower Not really, his title still somewhat exists but it's worthless, a new title was created upon adverse possession. he did not own the land, because only the king can own land. And he still possess hit title in some respect, however it's just become worthless.
HI AND THANK YOU FOR THE INFORMATION ,LAND REGISTRY IS NOW ONLY ON LINE ,,AND THE NEGLECTED LAND I'M LOOKING AT HAS NO POSTCODE, BUT TO REGISTER THE YOU NEED A POST CODE OR ADDRESS WHICH I/THEY DONT HAVE, ANY IDEAS ON THIS BBB KEITH HARDING
Think you would be a great barrister to be hired and helping those in need and they will ever be so grateful for help My question just have money sitting in the bank been saving for 8 years so Ton of money there… I don’t know how to invest or deal with the money if I hire you or your time would they organised this for me I want to get into land real estate and own a companies all registered just need some Guidance would appreciate the help ASAP thanks
Does this apply to river Bank moorings ? Our boat has been moored on Queens Land for 14 years, without any issue, but now somebody has "bought" the mooring and is trying to evict us.
This is very informative. Thanks.
When my parents bought their house around 1974-5, they bought it in the knowledge that a developer had acquired the rights to build an estate in place of the woods at the end of the garden. Between my parents' house and the neighbour is a slither of land about 10 feet wide that the developer owned which could have provided access to the estate. Instead, they built an 8 foot high brick wall across the end of the garden and across the end of the 10 foot strip of land. Thus making it unusable for access. The land had been neglected and had been used as a rubbish dump (though this had probably predated the developer's ownership). My dad sealed off the other end of the strip of land, cleared it out, and took down the fence separating the garden from the land (he had previously offered to buy the land from the developer, but had had no reply). He also offered to split the land with the neighbour, but the neighbour was happy for my parents to have the land in its entirety. That was all over 40 years ago and the land has been an integral part of the garden ever since (containing a wildlife pond, a gravelled area and flowerbeds etc). Access to the land is only possible through the back garden. I do not know whether the developer registered the land, but in any case, your video seems to indicate that my mum (my dad has passed away) has a convincing claim to the land.
You can check on the land registry if the developer actually owns the land or not for £3... its worth it.. it will also show the land boundary.
@@shazman15 Thanks. I had a feeling that not all land needed to be registered with the Land Registry at that time as it dates from a long time ago. Might be worth looking into though.
@@0cgw Yes if the history goes back many years it can be more difficult... I think the Land Registery digital records were maintained from 1993 onwards but still worth a stab, given its easy enough to check.
@@shazman15 I would only do this at a point you are ready to make claim as it will get flagged. To me its no difference to credit check companies once you make activity it becomes awake to others who will then action very quickly especially if they are holding lots of money.
I work for a utility company and see this all the time when big building companies purchase fields from farmers in order to build new housing estate,
On a lot of occasions when they turn up to start work they measure their site Boundary lines and discover people have done exactly this, the neighbours next door have extended their garden fences out to occupy more land to in effect land grab to make their property bigger.
Because the developers have legally purchased land that is legally registered the 1st thing they do is to rip the offending neighbours fence down and take possession of what is now registered to them.
There are also occasions when they turn up where there are sections/strips of land [who’s owners are not obvious at 1st] and you end up with ransom strips.
They build the new roads and housing estates only to discover later that someone owns a vital strip on a Boundary or in an awkward area, so in effect you cannot cross over that land to use the new roads to get to the new houses they have built.
More than a quarter of a million households have been abandoned and left empty when I did a quick search I am absolutely gob smacked great video thanks it's definitely food for thought!
Where did you search?
Please share
We lost a small section of land to a neighbours this way. We allowed the neighbour use of the land to grow a vegetable garden, we were on good terms with them, until they LEGALLY STOLE our land! Please think of the rightful owners before acquiring land this way.
Exactly what happened to my sister in law and her neighbour was a barrister who took her land from her she now suffers anxiety etc and has not worked for 2 years her life living next door to this barrister is a nightmare existence.
@@kevinambrose7074 It's grossly unfair. The legal system is so corrupt. I hope your sister manages to get beyond this disgusting injustice.
@@danielfinch362 enjoyed that story
@@paulmcgrath3882 I moved out the end of November. There is a lot more to the story, like demanding rent in cash only, and harrasment, so I may have more, I've got video and audio and emails exposing harrassment. I have 6 years to take a case against them. They've already regretted messing with me. It cost them time and more money than if they'd just pay me to leave. I've been renting my whole life and never had a problem with a landlord until now. My new place is nice and quiet, landlord are putting a new fibreglass roof on soon weather permitting. It was stressful having a rogue landlord.
Do you still hold the title in your name? or does he? I doubt he "owns" it and is just allowed to continue to occupy it. If he was to sell it, that would be another matter and I doubt that he would benefit at a point of sale.
I read an example of this a few years back when some one Put up a semi permanent tent on a piece of ancient woodland that was overlooked during dealing with a deceased's estate. They put the tent up and lived in it, practiced forest husbandry, fenced the land and maintained it. They documented the whole process. Since none of the inheritors were aware they needed to look at the land it was apparently an easy case to prove. I wish I could remember the details then I could put up more information.
Please be warned the BBB statement "in the UK" is false. All the references to statutes and land registration do not apply in Scotland.
Great explanation. My father fenced off a piece of unadopted land back in the 60s. He was able to get planning permission 25 years later and deeds to his chalet bungalow that he built. Some neighbours had already fenced off part of the land so he decided to get the rest. First come, first served!!
Thanks for watching!
That’s interesting cos I know of a person who moved in 90. Bit of land beside her house. A few years ago she decided to fence it for her use. Residents association complained to local authority. Took her to court. She maintained that piece of land for 29 years. Investigation of the land states that it belongs to developers. In the planning doc.. it states that piece of land has to stay as common land. Local authority and developer has never maintained it. She’s now trying to get adverse possession.
@@stephaniesamra7960 ok, that's also interesting. The land my father had was on an unadopted lane at the bottom of his garden. The lane is still unadopted, ie the council do not upkeep the surface.
@@janetharrod2750 But if someone has rights to pass and repass over that lane they can potentially apply to have the "obstruction" removed. Rights of way do not extinguish through lack of use.
My nice neighbour moved in & decided he was moving the boundary 2m in his benefit just on the day he new my Mrs was in hospital having a miscarriage due to the stress he’s caused. He’s trying adverse possession. Problem with boundary’s is they are only accurate to 2m in the countryside. He did exactly the same at another house he owns. He’s had a dodgy surveyor put measurements on his deeds to suit. He got away with it last time. I’d maintained this land for several years had chickens on it & his shed was the boundary for 30 yrs previously. He needs a 2m fire break for insurance purposes as he runs a business from the shed. That’s why he desperately needs it. This has been reported to land registry & I even issued him with a letter before he bought the place advising of this dispute. But he still went ahead. So I’ve lost 2m x400m of my garden. Some people🙄 I’m sure I’ll have the last laugh though one way or another.
Interesting videos.👍
There are a few US based legal channels I follow (there are enough similarities to our legal maxims to make them interesting), but few UK based legal channels. So I appreciate your time & effort in doing these.
Which ones? I find their system is far more political than ours.
Thanks, this has been very informative. I'm sure you don't want to get stuck in the groove of property rights but perhaps sometime in the future you could explain how compulsory purchase orders are a thing and why they're so hard to fight.
Because the crown actually owns all the land anyway and the legal paperwork is just formalities, if the government want the land they'll be working in the interests of the Crown so anything they say goes? Also the monarchy isn't the crown.. Go figure
They apply when land is needed for the greater public good, and market value is paid for the land.
@@ryanalexander3088 It’s all under the Catholic Church, check which crown she stuck on her head. I’ve never seen so much fraud in my life and we are all apart of it.
I find this very interesting as I came across this recently. How would a compulsory order be raised without information. Against the owner.
Our family purchased and registered a property in 1998. In subsequent years we applied for and received an additional copy of our registered titlefor our records.
However, we noticed that someone (not disclosed) was claiming a small piece of unfenced land adjoining our driveway and the highway.
I wrote a letter to Land Registry stating we own the land, according to title, and disputed any claim otherwise.
Further, we questioned as to why Land Registry had NOT NOTIFIED us of any claim being made as they are required to do.
You guessed it
NO RESPONSE!
We now adversely possess and maintain the claimed adverse pòssesion by unknown persons Legal ?
I am posting this to my friend who has a problem with someone trying to take a parcel of their land in this way. Thank you.
Well put, a subject that I was involved with before I retired from working using the LR act 2002 and 1925 daily.
I wonder if you would be kind enough to shed some light on my situation (pun intended). I have factual possession of a small parcel of land that is in the main the site of my garden shed. The timeframe is post LR Act 2002 and predates my purchase of the house and adjoining land.
It is registered, however, I understand that the use classification is either B2 or quite possibly B8 as it was a lumberyard. The yard has been developed as residential in a piecemeal fashion over the years all except this small parcel, which is only accessible via my property or via a wade across a millpond.
I think I'm ticking all of the boxes but it would be great to have an expert opinion and even better if it is free.
@@runswithcows Have a read here www.gov.uk/government/publications/adverse-possession-of-1-unregistered-land-and-2-registered-land and www.gov.uk/government/publications/adverse-possession-of-registered-land/practice-guide-4-adverse-possession-of-registered-land
@@grahamallison6704 That's really helpful, many thanks. Bit odd thinking of myself as a squatter but in this instance that's exactly what I am. It was the BlackBeltBarrister's comment that excluded residential property that made me question my understanding of my ability to acquire the land by adverse possession.
The only area that remains unclear is whether the period of factual possession is reset when the ownership of the adjoining property and land is transferred. I'll have a thorough read through.
My garden ascends sharply on very soft ground from my house, and it continually has eroded back since the property and adjacent property has existed. The result is that the "property line" as originally drawn is now on a high vertical subsidence, impractical and valueless to all. A similar condition exists along the row of my neighbours.The property owner at the top of my garden asked if she could fence across the top for safety and I agreed that it was a good idea. I assume that the placing of the fence puts me in possession of what is actually a liability! (I'm not complaining!)
Great that youve just clarifyed this loop hole for any future land thieves.
It's not a loop hole it's put in place to stop people hoarding land and letting it get overgrown and go to waste without a single bit of maintenance, if you own land and haven't even been to it in over a decade that's a you problem and you don't deserve to own it. Which is why if someone else uses and maintains the land for that period of time they are entitled to own it.
Ah good video, thanks. I do want to search out a piece of land. Seems the most important thing is to check the land register to see if it has a keeper or not first and foremost.
Fascinating video Daniel. Can't imagine it will ever apply to me but it is things like this why I find law so engaging.
Thanks!
@@BlackBeltBarrister hi Daniel, can I drop you an email about a situation like this and see what you think
What a great video. It would be excellent if you could do a separate video on unregistered land. We live on a 30 year old estate which has a 4 metre tree boundary between our garden and a field. This was originally done to hide the estate from view. Nobody has ever maintained the land and a few neighbours “moved in” and fenced off many years ago. I’ve long awaited a knock at the door! It is possible to legally claim title in this sort of situation. Cheers.
Very interesting. In the USA however, whoever pays the yearly property taxes on a piece of land, retains ownership of that land no matter who else uses it. Once the tax goes unpaid, anyone can pay the tax instead and if seven years goes by like that, the person who has paid that tax becomes the new owner. OR, if the taxes go unpaid for one year, the property will go up for a tax sale and someone can buy the rights to it, though in some states the original owner has six months or so to redeem it by paying that tax.
@@dgnash The only downside is, a lot of people lose their property because of our property tax laws. In areas that have a property tax (not all areas of the USA do) the state essentially owns your land, and rents it to you, typically for 1% of its value every year. So if your home and land is valued at say, $300,000 USD, that 'tax/rent' would be $3,000 you have to pay to the state every year. Don't pay and the property goes up for tax sale, often only for the amount of tax that has not been paid. So what happens fairly often is the person who was responsible for paying the tax, dies and the people left behind don't pay the next years payment since they've never had to deal with it before, and the property ends up in a tax sale, is sold, and those people, often a spouse, is kicked out with nothing.
@@dgnash Buy land from the state? Not exactly. You buy from private sellers. But the state is a sort of landlord that charges everyone yearly rent. Once you buy land or any property, it's generally yours to do with as you wish, though in many areas you have to deal with local building codes, permits, etc that limit what you can build or actually do with your land or buildings on that land. If you don't pay the state their yearly 'tax', they sell your property for the amount of tax that is owed. The state never keeps property for itself or tries to sell that property for a profit. It's all to get the taxes. So if you want to buy a house for instance, you buy it from the current owner and pay them. Most people have to borrow money from a bank to do this, so the bank holds the title to the house until the loan is paid off, usually in monthly installments. So the average person has to pay on their bank loan every month, as well as a yearly tax for the property to the state. Once the bank loan is paid off, they still have to pay their property tax every year or lose the rights to that property.
@@dgnash Interesting. The 'Council tax' does sound similar to our 'property tax'. But here in the USA, they don't bother taking you to court over the unpaid tax. They do send notices to you via snail mail to pay up or else, and the amount of time you have to pay varies state to state. But if you ignore the warnings, they simply list your property on a tax sale site that is or used to be posted in the local paper as well as on the county court house bulletin board. Though I'm sure there is a website for such stuff these days also. And if the tax goes unpaid past the deadline, it's offered for sale for the amount of tax owed. So some shrewd buyers can get a property worth tens of or hundreds of thousands of USD for a few hundred or thousand dollars of whatever the taxes owed was. Though in many areas, the original owner still has a short window of time to reclaim the property if they can scrape together the taxes owed. Some end up having to sell the property in order to get the money to pay the tax. As for lawyer fees in the USA, they vary. Most people in cases like this, don't need a lawyer and can simply go before a judge and state their case. Sometimes they need to file in a 'small claims' court and usually don't need a lawyer there either. But if they choose to hire a lawyer, they'll pay the lawyer an hourly fee, which is negotiable to a point, or even a fixed amount. The way lawyers make the most money here in the USA is when someone is being sued. In those cases, the person suing usually doesn't have enough money to pay their lawyer, so the lawyer agrees to take 40% of the money won IF the case is won. And nothing if the case is lost.
In California Adverse Possession requires payment of the taxes, the statutory period is 5 years. In the 19th century the Railroads had huge tracts of land granted to them in exchange for building the railroad. They also had a lot of influence in the state government so they prevailed on the legislature to pass the tax requirement since it was difficult to defend all that land from squatters.
Uk only pays tax on resident properties
About 12 years ago one of my grandmother's then neighbours 'took over' a section of a council-owned car park (they errected a wooden car port over it) and a few years later were apparently able to sell the house with the newly acquired land as part of the estate. I had wondered how this was legally done so thanks for the insight!
Worth remembering that Council land belongs to the people, so not really a good thing if it is snatched by private owners.
@@portcullis5622 Quite true but if what Daniel says is correct then they would have been notified about the attempted possession. They were quick to try to get a small animal sanctuary evicted on the grounds of 'inappropriate and non-permitted use' of arable farmland (the appeal was of course upheld) but I guess when your mates are involved...
Hmm I thought time runneth not against the King
@@someonespadre Tell that to the (London?) council who did nothing about squatters living in a large council owned building. They had cut it up into 'apartments' and when the council eventually moved to evict them many had been there for more than 15 years, so it turned out held legal title to their little bit.
@@loc4725 I’m not familiar with your entities…is the council public or private?
In US common law AP government land held in its public capacity (such as parks, rivers, ocean, lakes and forest land) can not be adversely possessed but land held in its proprietary capacity (for example a City’s maintenance facility) can be. Some states have statute law which deletes the proprietary exception so no government land can be adversely possessed.
So it really depends and whether the judge likes your case and finding a lawyer that
can convince him.
Fact
Thank you i am just beginning my adverse possession , you helped me understand it better hopefully all gos well
This guy is intellectually fascinating
On a similar sort of issue, i have used an access over a piece of land for over 30 years, and previous owners of my property used it for over 40 years prior to that. None of us have ever asked for or been given any permissions, it has just been used. Now the land has recently been sold and the new land owner's say that we can no longer use the access, which not only services my home but also my business. Thank you for any help and please keep up the excellent and very interesting videos.
This might fall under "Easement by prescription" ie through long use.
Here is his video on easements:
ua-cam.com/video/XESQW0CYDJI/v-deo.html
There is a corner plot within the village which I live close to which was fenced off by a local businessman. The land was I believe common land & lay opposite his business. He has within the past year or so submitted an application to build on that land which the parish council has resisted. The man was for years & may possibly still be a member of that parish council. Does his role within the council & his relationship with other councillors, some who are probably not averse to his planning application prejudice his claim in any way? He now has a locked gate & "private property" signs around the land.
Depending how long that fence was there and how long that neighbor has been taking care of it, technically the neighbor can legally claim it as his property. Its called adverse possession.
So one of the few times if you are found on land you don't currently own, you don't want to say you have the owners permission.
Genraly you don't want to say you have owners permission, the worsed that can happen is you get kicked off
@@hens0w that is exactly what I said in my comment
@@NerdCymru I mean I can't think of a time when you would want to say your somewhere with permission.
Maybe if you're on MOD land and it's ture.
@@hens0w You're retrieving your children's ball from your neighbour's back garden. They are not in but have said that they are happy for you to collect it yourself if it goes over the fence. Their neighbour from the other side has just moved in and is unaware of this arrangement and hasn't met you yet and therefore challenges you being there.
My mum, lived next to a bit of land that was fenced by someone...for 12 years . House built...was called Courtland. 👍
😁
@@BlackBeltBarrister caught... but I’m sure you got it.✅
Thank you for the very informative video. Helped massively to understand the overall process of obtaining land.
I’ve recently started to adversely possess a unregistered small field on the side of a hill overlooking my town, that has been left to overgrow and be dumped on by fly tippers for at least 15 years. This land is accessed by a narrow overgrown track / road which is most likely why it has been left and forgotten about. I’ve asked around the local area and people don’t know who owns / owned the land or when it was last used. I have put up ‘Privet property’ signs with my phone number written on them, located at both of the two entrances to the land. They have been up for over a month now and I’ve not yet had any phone calls. I’ve now began to cut back some of the very overgrown vegetation in the hopes of using the land and registering it in my name 12 years from now. All of these actions that I have taken I have photographed to help provide proof and aid the application.
Is there any further actions that you can think of that would aid my case in possessing this land and allow me to determine who owns the land?
Thanks for the help!
Put up a fence and lockable gate would be a good one.
@@James-co2nb Yeah! I should have said in the previous comment that the land is surrounded by stone and soil walls / banks which have barbed wire above. There’s two entrances from the lane. One which I have tied a big steel gate to the concrete posts either side of the entrance. The other which I have padlocked a chain across from the two concrete posts. I intend on making / buying some gates once the track is drivable.
Did you check your local land registry to see if it’s crown land? For my understanding is, crown land cannot be taken by adverse possession
Good video. Very well delivered overview on the subject.
Another very interesting video; thankyou. I have a suggestion for a Mr and Mrs Cladding of Lawchester own a Leasehold property...............and have recently tried to move properties. However Mrs Cladding has been informed they need an ESW1 form to confirm the property is safe concerning its exterior walls. The couple then receive a bill from the Lanlord for 50,000 pounds to make good the errors that have arisen in the ESW1 report. Please confirm the liability to these costs the couple face and what if anything they can do to avoid these costs. NB: The couple live in a flat within a building under 18 meters tall and so are not eligible for Govt assistance in removing defective cladding and or repair/replace fire prone features.
It is a shame you can't use this to save some historic buildings that are just being abandoned. There are often old buildings that just end up getting acquired by large development companies only for them to go up in flames after the developers encounter any preservation orders on them so they can build some modern stuff there instead. I wouldn't mind owning a nice old church or a small hosp... nah maybe not an abandoned hospital, forget that! An old church on the other hand would make a nice place to live even if it would be expensive to heat the main hall in the winter (I already found a way around that though).
Violence is always overlooked in these prickly circumstances. Those who enjoy the land at a another's expense, must lay in the land and organically recompense.
I know of a house where the owner Lady deceased two years ago. My friend living there as a guest of the Lady has been harassed by dubious characters and threatened in an attempt to get him out. My friend has done numerous checks and found one of these people has a conviction of a property fraud of some kind. The house and estate were intended by the Lady, to be sold and money given to charity but this is not the case here. The Council said he needs an eviction notice before he leaves but none has been forthcoming. Unfortunately my friend was finding it too stressful and moved out. They won.
Interesting. I have a railway line at the bottom of the garden. The old 3 wire fence has long since collapsed. The railway has installed a 'new' 8ft steel fence 3 meters inside of the old boundary fence ( 16 years ago ). This has left 40 Sq meters of land at the top of my garden only accessible via my garden. I use it for storage of compost bins etc. Is this land ripe for Adverse possession?
I think it's now yours.
Here for a similar reason! We are claiming an un owned small bit of woodlands behind our house.
We’ve began the fencing process 😏
I wonder, would it make any difference if the owner of the land is a local council and has leased that land to a tenant.
For example, there is exists a low rise block of 6 flats, 2 per floor over 3 floors, each of which has a garden. The block is owned, freehold, by the council. Flats 2 through 6 are rented by tenants, flat 1 is owned, leasehold, by the occupier. The gardens for flats 1 and 2 are immediately behind the block so can be accessed via a rear door from the flat as well from a side gate to a common walkway accessed via a door from the shared vestibule of the block. The gardens for the remaining flats are behind those gardens such that the gardens for flats 3 and 5 are behind the garden for flat 1 and those for flats 4 and 6 behind the the garden for flat 2. The only division between the gardens are short concrete posts between which had been strung basic fencing (two pairs of twisted wire with rough wooden staves inserted between them every 6-12 inches).
Up until 1 year ago none of the 4 gardens for flats 3 to 6 were maintained by anyone, the duty to maintain the gardens falls to the tenants under the terms of their tenancy but this is not enforced in any meaningful way. As a result all gardens were heavily overgrown with brambles, bindweed &c). Last year the tenant of flat 4 agreed to exchange gardens with the tenant in flat 6 (so their garden was now at the end, the order of gardens went from 3-5-4-6 to 3-5-6-4) and engaged a local builder to clear and level the garden then lay lawn and erect high fences around the garden. As well as doing this the builder laid a concrete path to the garden and erected a simple wooden fence from the common walkway to the gate in the fence for flat 4's garden. As a result the only access to the remaining 3 gardens is via the garden of Flat 1.
Suppose the occupant of flat 1 were to cut back the brambles and other weeds in the gardens for flats 3, 5 and 6, and treat the new growth with a systemic weedkiller as a means to prevent growth into their own garden which has been blighting their peaceful enjoyment of their garden since they moved in. If this were kept up long enough, 12+ years, then if I'm understanding this video correctly, there is a strong chance that the occupant of flat 1 would gain adverse possession of the gardens, presumably the freehold.
Our Mortgage offer was pulled as the Lender didn't want us to apply for Adverse Possession post completion regarding a strip of land that crosses the front of the lawn.
I found this really helpful, thank you👍🏻👌🏻
I read about this years ago . Which is probably why I never took such actions. It takes too bloody long. Which is a shame. Unlike America . But England is a small country. But best of luck to those in their endeavours
So does thay mean that somebody cant adversely possess a domestic property, even without squatting? What if somebody gained access to a property that is empty, changed the locks, and maintained the land around it for 10 years?
Eeee I'm dying to do something like this really am
I tried that on an acre behind Kensington Palace... I didn't get very far !
😂
I think that's the most expensive street in the UK!
@@trickygoose2 Ha ha... You are probably right !
A brief overview... so much content in there!
Great bit of advice. liked and subscribed. Could you go,at some point,into more detail on finding unregistered land in Scotland? England has a free map as i understand,is there a way to find land in Scotland without pouring money into the process? Apparently,about 50% of scottish land is unregistered.
I would love to find a piece of available land, think I’ll have to pay to look on the land registry.
@@dgnash The law's the law and a loophole is there to be exploited. Without them we would be under Labour :p
@@dgnash The law is there for a reason. Use your land or lose it !!
That's called theft. Please consider those you would be stealing from before you undertook something like this.
@@dgnash Yes use your land or lose it ! If you lost land then you did not go visit for at least 10 years. This law is there so land can be worked not so lazy landowners can just sit on it and do nothing.
Thank you for the spelling correction ☺️ land set aside for wildlife would be tendered and looked after, not abandoned and left for people to dump on. One only has to turn up or check their land once every 10 years to make sure no one is on it.
Sounds like theft to me. Why isn't there a requirement to inform the titled owner of the intention? They could easily be hundreds of miles away and not know of such moves?
Theft has its own definition
@@joeds3775 yes, an action intended to deprive the rightful owner permanently of possession?
Steal a sheep you’re a thief, steal a country you’re a King.
IANAL, but surely if they're hundreds of miles away they are demonstrably not using the land. If they are using the land then they'll have an agent of some sort who would, presumably, tell the owner if someone was trying to take adverse possession.
@@merseyviking Its not about occupancy, its about ownership? someone cant smply steal your property because you arent using it? Think of all the epty property ownned by Banks in major cities?
My neighbour replaced his boundary fence to my property and in doing so moved the boundary closer to my house thus giving him more land. He only told me that he was going to replace the fence, he did not ask for permission to move the boundary in his favour. How can I get the fence moved back to its original line?
Well the way I understand the outlined rule, A letter of permission would surface and stop a claim to your land, maybe wrong, sure someone will correct me. In my limited experience all land and right of way issues are civil matters, so unless you can afford representation your screwed.
Take down the fence, which is on your land, and install a new fence yourself on the true boundary, taking care to document the exercise.
@@cdl0 That is really bad advice, don't ever do this! You need to take legal advice first, it is very dangerous messing with fences, you can end up with a huge legal bill if you don't do it the correct way.
@@dannymurphy1779 No, there is no problem putting a fence on the true boundary, which is the correct way to do it. Always keep a record.
@@cdl0 I had imo, excellent advice once from someone that took the “legal” route over fence boundary issues, that took years and a lot of stress to resolve… I was facing a similar issue, whereby numerous neighbours of acres I bought were trying to claim “my” land… So I asked him if he had his time again, what would he do?… He replied: “I’d just knock down the fence and let them try to take me to court”
So I did just that. And though one neighbour was verbally abusive, none took me to court, so I claimed back what was legally mine.
If the unregistered land is unregistered, who can challenge the title ?
Exactly! Am game ha are u 😊
After being here 17 years and there being a historical boundary hedge between me and a neighbour who’s been there 18 months, the neighbour has cut through and cut down the historical hedge that isn’t owned by either party, erected a huge fence on my land encompassing the boundary hedge claiming he owns both the hedge and my land. I always was told the hedge was mine by the previous owner and was forced to maintain it I never doubted it until the land registry told me neither property owned the boundary. I have contacted the insurance company to instigate legal action and the police as I was threatened with assault. At the moment the police aren’t doing much 🙄. They also created a new walkway into my land leaving me incredibly unsafe to the point I’m scared anyone can get into my land now. I have been assaulted here before. Do you think I have a good case?
Sounds like you live in a nice area.
If the land registry says he doesn't own it and he's built on it, I'm sure you have a watertight case. Go spend a bunch of money trying to prove it.
@@Ghhyuttgg that’s what legal cover is for 👍
Would you be intetested in a video on aggravated trespass (AT) I hear many things which, I believe, are incorrect about AT, such as 'you have to commit a crime while trespassing for it to be AT', or 'you have to be carrying a weapon for it to be AT'.
As I understand it, all that is required is 'a further action' beyond the actual trespass that either obstructs or disrupts the lawful activity on the land, or intimidates others from engaging in lawful activity on the land.
That 'further act' can be virtually anything that fits the criteria above.
There does not have to a criminal element to the 'further act' , nor need there be a weapon involved.
Would be intetested to know if my understanding is right.
But isn't the obstruction or disruption or intimidation a crime under a public order offence?
@@TheSadButMadLad Those words are not mentioned in relation to Public Order offences. If your actions were threatening, abusive (or insulting for section 4 and 4a) or disorderly, then yes, the method of disruption, obstruction or intimidation could also be a public order offence. But conversely, if you are not threatening, abusive or insulting, or trying to illicit imminent violence, then there would be no public order offence.
I guess in some situations you might get charged with both aggravated trespass AND public order offences.
Hopefully, he will look at doing a video on this, and educate us.!😀
@@zigzagtoes Bauer & Orrs vs DPP is a good case to look at.
Aggravated trespass does require a further act beyond the original trespass. This act has to have the intention of obstructing or disrupting lawful activity on the land, or intimidating other from engaging in a lawful activity on the land.
If you can convince a judge that your mere refusal to leave, and continued presence does amount to that, good luck. That would possibly have the effect of criminalising most trespass, something which historically has not been the case in E & W.
@@zigzagtoes Still requires an intent to disrupt etc by the trespasser though, which is harder to prove (depends on the exact circumstances). I do get what you are saying, and ultimately it would be up to a magistrate to decide, but I still feel from looking at other cases there does need to be a separate act beyond mere trespass. Refusing to leave is still just trespass, nothing more.
@@zigzagtoes Again, it may come down to intent. If he entered as a trespasser with the intent of stealing, or doing damage to people or property then it would probably be covered by the Theft Act 1968 (probably section 8, Burglary).
If not, his advancing towards you might be construed as intimidating you from conducting your lawful activity on the site (your security role), and therfore be AT. Every case would need to be looked at on it's own merits.
Thank you for these videos. Fantastic 👍🏼
Great timing, I'm currently doing a paper on adverse possession as part of my LLB. Many thanks :)
Glad it was helpful!
Tort Of Private Nuisance
Misuse Of Easement Property
Private Nuisance
May I ask a question about a land issue?
If a pub/restaurant puts tables and chairs outside their property on a public walkway are they breaking the law?
A lot of pubs seem to to be doing it nowadays and I believe they have no right to do it as it’s in effect obstruction.
Would be curious to know the actual law on that as some businesses seem to be taking up large sections of public thoroughfares for their businesses.
Will address on ua-cam.com/users/blackbeltsecrets !
I live in a 1936 bungalow with half acre plot. A year ago a neighbour couple end of the back garden. They live in a 20 yr old house with tiny back garden. Spent a few visits on my door. One was trees blocking light could they have them cut ok i said. But cut too many down going past there next door neighbours. The tree chaps did cut the wood up for my wood burner. Next got letter and photo showing summer house top needed fixing with felt. I said ok thanks then was asked if the fence coming away slightly could be taken down. So they could use the summer house also make a vegetable patch near it. I cant get down very easy i am an amputee wheelchair bound plus had serious brain damage 30 years ago. They go in the summer house sometimes but not any vegetable planting. I feel like having the fence section put back. Could i put the back am confused. There is a 10 inch gap between my fence and the neighbours along the fence. But picture of my damaged fence they sent me in a letter they removed there fence to be able to see and photo. Anyway i wondered what you thought of it i can have it replaced the missing fence restore it back i hope. BlackBeltBarrister .
Thank you for an informative and interesting video. You do not define 'Factual Possession'. I would asume in means in actual possession of, in the present time. Would that preclude an Adverse Possession claim of any land that you are not in actual possession of, but may have had once, say in the years 1968 -1980?
I am sure it need to be current. It reverts to the paper owner from 1980 when the possession ends.
So I can't just start ploughing next door's front garden?
Isn't the intention to possess land an act of war?
Very interesting but still a bit wordy for my small brain!
In simple terms, what do I need to do to get me some free land?
A couple of questions:- What reasonable steps could a title holder take to remove an adverse posessor from their (registered) land during that 10 year period? Also, as the European convention on human rights still applies after Brexit, has it been 'tested in court' in relation to adverse posession of registered land after Britain left the EU? Thanks. Good concise video btw, very informative.
ECHR has little to do with the EU.
You would have to oust the trespasser by force. A court order would be expensive and take too long. Go to the local gym or nightclub and hire some heavies to persuade the trespasser to leave.
@@fivish Using force to take land that a court could rule is another persons property would not look good to the court. You would also be at risk of a conviction for assault etc.
Legally? Using reasonable force to evict the person yourself with proof that you are the legal title holder to the land or failing that taking them to court to secure an eviction, which you can then refer to bailiffs who will extricate the offender from the property under order of the court. Bear in mind you have 10 years to do this. and lets be honest the basis of adverse possession is based on the "principle of use it or lose it" and the idea that if you weren't using the land enough to notice someone else had taken adverse possession then its a greater loss to the person who's maintained and used the land for the last _ years than the person who has done nothing to stop them.
@@fivish Use force, by all means, but the police would be called, and you would be arrested, and I am sure the Adverse Possessor will then take steps to further secure the land. you need to stop the clock, and that's only achieved through the courts.
Excellent, thank you. Do the same rules apply to Unregistered land ? I assume that they do and the only difference would be that the 65 day notification period to the title owner by the Land Registry would not apply ?
I think sometimes with unregistered land, notices may be served on owners of neighbouring land.
Have you done a video on ground rent and becoming freehold
Great work 💪
Great video, very informative. Thank you.
Could you perhaps tell me what the difference between positive prescription (Scotland) and adverse possession (England, Wales) is please?
We have a garage that we used since 1984. And the owner before 1969 we have maintained the garage and since removed it as a tree had collapsed on it so we fenced it off. This was council land sold to a local housing associations and now has just been sold with other garages. Can we therefore apply this.
Possession of land is the key word, rather than own the land. If anything the land owns us
1:52 "Residential Premises" What if the building is in such a state of dereliction it would be inhabitable? (Legislation defines residential property as property that is being used as, is suitable for being used as, or is being developed to be used as, a dwelling). However, if it derelict, it could not be legally classed as "being used as, suitable for, or even being developed" With all the way legal professionals use all and every possible nuance's within the English language, how would this stand up in a court?
Great question.
You may also want to research the legal definition of “dwelling”, “house” and “home”
This doesn't apply to any part of the UK outwith England & Wales.
If i find a piece of land nobody worked i can go to take the land to start to work???????
Eeeeyep we sure can haha been dying yo do sumthing like this gorgeous at least 20 year, I'll help ha u game
In 1990 the local council agreed to rent me a piece of land adjacent to my property but never replied to solicitor and I have never paid anything. The land was then apparently transferred. What is my position as to adverse possession please? Thankyou for a timely and informative video
If you have documented anything that can prove your were in possession of the land, then you can try and claim it. the title may have been transferred, however possession was not. It may be worth attempting to get the land put into your name, however it may be risky, due to the land registry act 2002. however as you mentioned you took possession in 1990, so the old rules should still apply.
No one can own land in this country you only have it by title for the sole use until you move it on or you no longer wish to work that piece of land
The reason why you don’t own land is simple,
The land and the people are one ( and you should understand this )
Common land is what the people can use and acquire for use, and work it for a number of years and then the title is yours
Just a thought
You are right. effectively the land as whole is belonging to the crown and as such we the people of that land can only claim title of the estate for a portion of the land.
Just because you find something lying around, does not mean its yours to take.
But it can with the right judge.
Finders keepers. Possession is 9 10ths of the Law.
@@thewizzard3150 😂😂👍
Hi . Can I ask about the Nuremberg Code does it still stand could you explain that foe me.
Is there anyway, to find land that is not owned....and is available and up for grabs?
you can go on the Land Registry portal and look at the mapsearch facility.. it will identify areas of unregistered land - that does not mean that there is not a known unregistered owner of it though.. the only way really that people practically acquire land by adverse possession is for bits of land which adjoin their property - either them or former owners extend the boundaries.
@@imprezabob Thanks.... all the best.
Very good information.....thanks for this.
very informative, I am about to attempt my first Adverse Possession in the coming days. What sort of legal protections will I enjoy, my intent is to put up a private land sign with a alt phone number, in the hope that no one calls, but if they do I will instantly drop any attempt. do they have a right to remove signs ?
Could this apply to an informal travelers site ?
No laws apply ,or are applied to travellers. FFS!!
I'm currently in the process of adversly possessing 2 pieces of land. One has a public footpath crossing it? Are there any legalities I need to watch out for?
What about retrieving a ball back from your neighbour's garden if your neighbour's garden is a private property?
Could someone explain in few words? So if there is an abandoned bungalow house not registered in land registry, someone could just move there, repair it start paying taxes and other bills. Then after 12 years he could claim that land as his property and if owner wont say anything on next 65 days, that land will be that guy who's been living there for 12 years?
Pretty much
Hi i have found a piece of land that is in my opinion not being used people have been fly tipping on the land i have done a land check and it belongs to the local council can i put a fence and gate up and use this land ? Thankyou
How to thieve land in 5 easy steps. Great. Does this work for cars and yachts too ?
How about people?
Fun fact you cannot steal land, you can only create a stronger title to use the land.
Wait. Let me get this right. Basically, you are saying if I occupy/use a piece of land without asking for permission, for a set period of time, I can then apply for the land to belong to me?
yes
I wish when I was younger I had a lawyer like you. At the age of 23 I was at a party in a rough area in Glasgow. It was loud and the police were called. On arrival they entered the house and arrested myself and another boy. I was charged with police assault accused of pushing an officer to the chest. For the record I didn't. I now have police assault on my record and I think it's there for life. It affects me getting insurance for my business I'm now nearly 40 years old. Mr black belt are you aware of anyway I could resolve this miscarriage of justice? . I assume I'm just stuck with it but it would be nice if I could correct it one day. Kind regards Ian.
The Land is OURS! ( TLIO)
Whose????
So what happens if a residential boundary line is not what the councils maps show? IE someone has moved it at some point unknown.
If one was to take physical possession of a house by changing the locks would that person, whilst having adverse possession without full rights to the property have the right to rent the property out?
Hi any info on my previous question would be great thanks
So I’m summary, even adhering to the laws, and waiting 10 years, the owner can still chuck you off, and has 2 years to do so. Which in my mind makes the whole thing worthless! Imagine spending 10 years living on a lovely piece of countryside, growing your food, settled right in, THEN get spend up to years of sleepless nights and angst ridden days worrying about being kicked off!. No thanks!
Why should taking someone else's land for nothing be simpler? I don't think the law here was designed for people to just set up their home and life on the land and try claim it as their own, that would be very risky and foolish. It's usually used for small patches of land that have poor access or no significant use but could be put to good use by someone else. For example, a few feet of land at the end of your garden or beside a house on an estate etc. These little patches of land are too small to be useful for a developer, but a home owner might enjoy a larger garden or a veg plot etc.
If the titled owner is on a long holiday at the time an application is made or the postman's having a bad day its curtains.
It's curtains. There are dozens of occasions of legal fraud is being committed where thieves take over ownership of properties while the legitimate owners are away.
@@greenpedal370 Yep. A local council intentionally sent legal notices to fictitious addresses (admitted in court later as “oops an admin error!” X 6 different addresses a mistake??- yeah right!) So they could claim my property.
@@InJusticeAustralia And the media, legal profession and your local MP did what? The silence was deafening!
I wonder if anyone knows - there's a spot of unowned land behind our row of houses that people park on. It's also access to a telephone pole. One of the neighbours has built a fence (a week ago; he moved in a few months ago) around it with a sign saying "claimed under adverse possession" so no one can park on it. Obviously this is annoying for the people who usually park on it, as there's very limited space to park otherwise. He's also put a camera up in case people remove the fence. We are quite confused as to what anyone can do? We were all fine with parking on that land first come first serve before 😂
My understanding is that basically he would have to maintain that land for 10 years before he can claim it so pull down the fence and park your car there
@@MrTangolizard true that s why you get 10 years for safety
How about establishing a right of way over land?
It does not sound like owning land in England is that easy either. Sounds like their law also may protect trespassers and people who just want to take your land. Amazing.
This does not apply to Scotland
Here is an interesting curiosity, whilst trying to find out if the Council did actually own the land adjacent to my allotment plot, I discovered that the lease for the allotments did not cover my plot on the map although I have been and continue to pay rent for the plot to the association who lease the rest of the land. In another years time I will have been on that plot for 10 years. Could I claim register my plot as outright ownership and stop paying rent to the allotment association? Here is the snag with declaring UDI. I would still have to cross the allotment land to gain access to that plot so it might not be a very good idea.
I would doubt it as your paying of rent could be argued to be an admission that you do not hold the land yourself and as such have not been adversely possessing the land. However if the council do not actually hold the title to the land then Its possible you could stop paying the rent and THEN start the adverse possession process from that point and hope that the council doesn't try to retake possession for a new tenant or to claim the land themselves.
I am paper owner of land acquired in the 1970's that was adversely possessed some time before 1980
and is now LR registered to a new owner, no notification was received I guess because LR had no record of my address
so no objection was possible, please where do I stand wrt returning land to its rightful owner (me)?
@stupid bloke land is like brains or muscles. If you don't use it you lose it. The user is now the rightful owner. Your paper and imagined ownership is now fictional.
@@thewizzard3150 He is the victim of legalised theft.
@@srspower we are all victims of legalized theft.
@@srspower Not really, his title still somewhat exists but it's worthless, a new title was created upon adverse possession. he did not own the land, because only the king can own land. And he still possess hit title in some respect, however it's just become worthless.
Nice moral compass mate
Thank you for Sharing your Information
Always interesting. What if there is a path that runs through the land?
HI AND THANK YOU FOR THE INFORMATION ,LAND REGISTRY IS NOW ONLY ON LINE ,,AND THE NEGLECTED LAND I'M LOOKING AT HAS NO POSTCODE, BUT TO REGISTER THE YOU NEED A POST CODE OR ADDRESS WHICH I/THEY DONT HAVE,
ANY IDEAS ON THIS BBB
KEITH HARDING
Think you would be a great barrister to be hired and helping those in need and they will ever be so grateful for help
My question just have money sitting in the bank been saving for 8 years so Ton of money there… I don’t know how to invest or deal with the money if I hire you or your time would they organised this for me I want to get into land real estate and own a companies all registered just need some Guidance would appreciate the help ASAP thanks
How about you buy me some land?
Is there a law around snipping a rusty old padlock to replace it with your own lock?
Does this apply to river Bank moorings ? Our boat has been moored on Queens Land for 14 years, without any issue, but now somebody has "bought" the mooring and is trying to evict us.