Machining Tool Holder Test - Part 1: Slot Milling with Walter Tools MC326 | Mori Seiki NH6300 DCG II

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 1 тра 2018
  • The importance of a tool holder in slot milling
    Download Camcut the Machinist App for Free at Google Play or App Store.
    www.camcut.fi/app_en.html
    #waltertools #mastercam #machining

КОМЕНТАРІ • 22

  • @SirRootes
    @SirRootes 3 роки тому +1

    We just ordered a new Mazak VCN 530C, looks like I will be recommending a few more hydraulic holders! ha!

  • @mpereztab
    @mpereztab 6 років тому

    Great job.

  • @chronokoks
    @chronokoks 6 років тому +4

    I'm still baffled how well weldons work... except groove dimensional accuracy since it's a slip fit

  • @Steve_Just_Steve
    @Steve_Just_Steve 6 років тому +2

    I would love to know why shrink fit was at the back of the pack...... I always hear it touted up. Great video

    • @gredangeo
      @gredangeo 6 років тому +5

      Pretty sure the overall tool length was longer than it should have been. Slightly unfair testing.
      2nd, even if it was a worse tool holder choice for full slotting. Half the time, you likely don't want to be full slotting. The shrink-fit's main advantage is reach ability into deep places. Great for 5 axis machines, that usually require crazy stickouts.

  • @MarkDonerSD
    @MarkDonerSD 6 років тому +14

    It looks like the tool in the shrink fit holder was sticking out a lot further, which would explain the noise and rough finish. Not really a fair test if they aren't the same length from the holder

    • @MarkDonerSD
      @MarkDonerSD 6 років тому +4

      On second look, maybe it's just that the holder itself is long and skinny

    • @manuelcontreras4428
      @manuelcontreras4428 6 років тому

      I agree with you, i would not choose that long tool.for a slot.

    • @ipadize
      @ipadize 4 роки тому

      @@MarkDonerSD yes there are bigger shrink fit toolholders. This test was unfair

    • @spazzywhitebelt
      @spazzywhitebelt 3 роки тому +1

      @@ipadize ehh maybe but most of the heat shrink holders I've seen look like that and are meant for creating longer gauge length tools so they can access hard to reach features. Would a stubby heat shrink work better, probably, do they exist idk.

  • @Spark-Hole
    @Spark-Hole 6 років тому +2

    Tool pull out 2.2005 mm, What das actually mean. Throw away the job?

  • @jirisohr3267
    @jirisohr3267 6 років тому +2

    Weldon is ok. Good job.

  • @zerozero7413
    @zerozero7413 6 років тому

    Have you tried power grip?

    • @jirisohr3267
      @jirisohr3267 6 років тому

      For full slot - is Weldon ok, for side slotting need Hydro od ER and 2-3x variable helix. Thats all Fox.

  • @burghardtzerspanung640
    @burghardtzerspanung640 6 років тому +4

    If you are using a scientific approach, why there is no standard deviation in your results? And a quick comment on your tool pull out results: I think there was no pull out a the Hydraulic Chuck, Weldon and Shrink fit holder. That was just the tool heating up an therefore you milled a deeper slot at the end.
    Greetings from Germany an keep on producing videos :)

    • @900stx7
      @900stx7 6 років тому +2

      It had better than 2mm of tool pull out. That's a lot to blame on heat expansion. Definitely the tool moving in the holder.

    • @matter9
      @matter9 6 років тому

      900 STX 2mm on the er collet chuck

  • @vinaygupta241985
    @vinaygupta241985 6 років тому

    You Not Mention Of material Doing this machine & tool with Shrink fit with Aluminum Material This is possible ,have you try with the material D2 hardness -52 HRC with this RPM & VC with this Vf also DOC

  • @user-ds5kd7co8o
    @user-ds5kd7co8o 5 років тому

    Have you tried Centro - P holder?

  • @Juxtaposed1Nmotion
    @Juxtaposed1Nmotion 6 років тому +2

    this test is hardly conclusive.