IRN Potemkin - Guide 078

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 9 лют 2025
  • The IRN Potemkin, a pre-dreadnought of Imperial Russian Navy is today's subject.
    Next on the list:
    -Hipper class
    -KMS Prinz Eugen
    -Yamato class
    -Italia class
    -Tsesarevich
    -Βασίλισσα Ολγα (Basilissa Olga)
    -Nagato class
    -Monitor Parnaiba
    -G-class destroyer
    -HMS Glowworm
    -Town class cruisers
    -USS Wichita
    -Lord Nelson class
    -Essex class
    -Slava (Pre-dreadnought)
    -USS Massachusetts
    -Pensacola class
    -HIJMS Oyodo
    -Riachuelo (NB)
    -I-19
    -HMS Ark Royal
    -ORP Błyskawica
    -USS West Virginia
    -Amagi Class
    -Tosa Class
    -Alaska class
    -Derfflinger class
    -Yorktown class
    -Tre Kronor class
    -Nelson class
    -Gato class
    -Admiralen class
    -H class (NB)
    -Greek 'Monarch' class destroyers
    -'Habbakuk' project
    -USS Texas
    -USS Olympia
    -HIJMS Mikasa
    -County class
    -KMS Tirpitz
    -Montana class
    -Florida class
    -USS Salt Lake City
    -Storozhevoy
    -Flower class
    -USS San Juan
    -HMS Sheffield
    -USS Johnston
    -Dido class
    -Hunt class
    -HMS Vanguard
    -Mogami class
    -Almirante Grau
    -Surcouf
    -Von der Tann
    -Massena
    -HMCS Magnificent
    -HMCS Bonaventure
    -HMCS Ontario
    -HMCS Quebec
    -Lion class BC
    -USS Wasp
    -HMS Blake
    -HMS Romala/Ramola
    -South Dakota (1930's)
    -SMS Emden
    -Väinämöinen and Ilmarinen
    -Destroyer Velos
    -U.S.S. John R. Craig
    -C class
    -HMS Caroline
    -HMS Hermes
    -Iron Duke
    -Kronprinz Erzerzorg Rudolph.
    -HMS Eagle
    -Ise class
    -18 inch monitor
    -Mogami
    -Vanguard
    -De Zeven Provinciën
    -South American Dreadnoughts
    -Fletcher class
    -USS Langley
    -Kongo class
    -Grom class
    -St Louis class
    -H class special
    -All-big-gun designs
    -USS Oregon
    -Gascogne
    -Alsace
    -Lyon and Normandie classes
    -Leander class
    -HMS Ajax
    -Project 1047
    -O class
    -R class
    -Battle class
    -Daring class
    -USS Indianapolis
    -Atago/Takao
    -Midway class
    -Graf Zeppelin
    -Bathurst class
    -RHS Queen Olga
    -HMS Belfast
    -Aurora
    -Imperator Nikolai I
    -USS Helena
    -USS Tennesse
    -Von der Tann
    -HMNZS New Zealand
    -HMS Queen Mary
    -USS Marblehead
    -New York class
    -L-20e
    -Abdiel class
    Specials:
    -Fire Control Systems
    -Protected Cruisers
    -Scout Cruisers
    -Naval Artillery
    -Tirpitz (damage history)
    -Treaty Battleship comparison
    -Warrior to Pre-dreadnought
    -British BC Ammo Handling
    -Naval AA Special
    -Plan Z

КОМЕНТАРІ • 191

  • @Dr_V
    @Dr_V 5 років тому +119

    Pantelimon is the name of an orthodox saint, considered patron of the medical profession and supposedly based on a real historical person who practiced medicine in the 3rd century in the city of Nicomidia (Byzantine empire). Miracle myths aside, he was famous for not soliciting any payment for his services and offering free medical care to the poor.

    • @CanalTremocos
      @CanalTremocos 4 роки тому +16

      Saint Pantaleon of Nicomedia. Also a Catholic saint. His relics ended up in Porto and he was the city's patron until the 1980's.

    • @vipertwenty249
      @vipertwenty249 4 роки тому +3

      @@CanalTremocos Whereupon he decided he'd had enough of all that and can now be found slumming it in a deckchair on a Jamaican beech drinking rum and smoking weed.

    • @Ужасныйужос
      @Ужасныйужос 4 роки тому +3

      На Черном море была какая-то мания переименовывания кораблей.

  • @rollosnook
    @rollosnook 5 років тому +101

    Every film student knows this ship well, due to the movie "Battleship Potemkin".

    • @TheLiamis
      @TheLiamis 5 років тому +17

      Space battleship potemkin?

    • @roscoewhite3793
      @roscoewhite3793 4 роки тому +13

      In the Star Trek Original series episode "The Ultimate Computer," the Potemkin is one of four sister-ships of the Enterprise involved in the climactic scenes (the others are Excalibur, Hood, and Lexington).

    • @lawrencelewis8105
      @lawrencelewis8105 4 роки тому +9

      The Odessa Steps scene from that movie is replicated in the film, "The Untouchables" from the 1980s with Kevin Costner and Sean Connery.

    • @mikeholton9876
      @mikeholton9876 3 роки тому +8

      Every student of history promptly ignores the film majors eyeing the Potemkin, and instead eyes the Avrova (Aurora) with the same appreciation. though a mere cruiser competing for adulation against a mighty battleship, she (the Aurora ) has 2 advantages; One, she fired the first shot of the Russian Revolution (from her forecastle signal gun) and Two, she is still floating and looking magnificent today. (im nobody's communist but a lover of history, a visit to her is on my bucket list) look her up folks.

    • @johnvanlindingham9490
      @johnvanlindingham9490 3 роки тому

      Am a navel fan am 61 a captain and have never herd of the movie do not be presumptish

  • @RegisTraiter
    @RegisTraiter 5 років тому +23

    I used to have a plastic scale model of Potemkin back when I was a kid. SOOOOO many parts. Took me about 2 weeks to fully put it together. It was beautiful.

    • @mikeholton9876
      @mikeholton9876 3 роки тому +3

      yep, i built her(him, Russians use masculine pronouns for ships) too. was a fun build

    • @vespelian
      @vespelian 2 роки тому

      I have Potempkin serving in my fleet, a Soviet made 1/400 kit though the original moulds were French. The box are and cardboard quality say a lot about Soviet quality.

  • @stevenpilling3773
    @stevenpilling3773 3 роки тому +22

    The insane history of Potemkin is what makes it the most recognized name of a Russian warship. I guess that's why Star Trek used it!

  • @Hannah_Em
    @Hannah_Em 6 років тому +24

    It always catches me by surprise how... antiquated the ships of the black fleet looked in the beginning of the 20th century. The flat vertical side panels and the "fat" plan view compared to other more slender ships of the age (HMS Dreadnought, HMS Warspite, etc.) with pointier bows and sterns all sort of add up to make them look more like bulk freighters than purpose built warships to me

  • @JohnJohansen2
    @JohnJohansen2 6 років тому +58

    Thanks for the human voice!
    It's so much nicer to listen to than the robotic one.

  • @spider0804
    @spider0804 5 років тому +70

    Any stories about the Russian navy during the first and second world wars are generally a guide on what not to do.

    • @Colt45hatchback
      @Colt45hatchback 5 років тому +16

      Im pretty sure before the cold war the russian navy was essentially a training guide for other navys on exactly how to fail at being a navy, how to provoke war with someone you dont wish to fight and in turn how important it is to be able to distinguish between a fishing boat and a warship, how to lose a battle on paper you couldnt possibly lose, and lets not forget the main one how ships can be sunk by land based artillery if you let the enemy get a vantage point overlooking your entire fleet. Haha

    • @brucetucker4847
      @brucetucker4847 5 років тому +19

      @@Colt45hatchback Very different after that, though! No one who served in the USN during the Cold War had the slightest doubt that the Soviets, and especially their submarine force, would be extremely dangerous opponents if it ever came to a shooting war. They probably still would be, although I understand their general state of readiness is abysmal these days due to lack of funding.

    • @micfail2
      @micfail2 4 роки тому +7

      @Bruce Tucker I mean people thought that at the time because of effective Soviet propaganda, but now that we actually have records of the Soviet Navy during the Cold War we know that it was almost as terrible as the Russian Navy has been throughout history.

    • @jmi5969
      @jmi5969 3 роки тому +3

      ​@@brucetucker4847 Unfortunately for us Russians, lack of funding is a thing of the past. The military in general, and the navy, had sort of windfall financing in the last decade. Sure, most of this money is swindled and syphoned, but quite a lot is actually invested in new... kamchatkas. What a waste.

    • @thatdude3938
      @thatdude3938 3 роки тому +2

      @@micfail2 lol man, Soviet subs kept their NATO adversaries on alert for the entire Cold War

  • @foowashere
    @foowashere 6 років тому +14

    Very enjoyable episode, thanks for making! I've always held a fascination for these pre-dreadnoughts. The actions in the Black Sea are quite diverse and interesting.

  • @CheapSushi
    @CheapSushi 6 років тому +7

    Just shows that reality can be stranger than fiction. The entire thing is quite ridiculous. Definitely had a colorful history. Thanks for this!

  • @MrJohndoakes
    @MrJohndoakes 4 роки тому +5

    Most of the Black Sea Fleet ship names are religious or named after historical figures: "Tri Sviatitelia" are the three Holy Hierachs of Eastern Orthodoxy (Basil the Great, Gregory the Theologian, John Chrysostom), "Rostislav" is named after Rostislav I of Kiev and Prince of Smolensk in the 1100s.

  • @santiago5388
    @santiago5388 6 років тому +15

    Yes! I was waiting for this. Thanks for the video and the great job.

  • @bernardtimmer6723
    @bernardtimmer6723 4 роки тому +8

    Sergei Eisenstein produced a masterpiece at the time, a brilliant film.

  • @kentlindal5422
    @kentlindal5422 4 роки тому +67

    ... Every Sailor ever: Renaming a ship is bad luck.
    USSR: Hold my Rotten Borscht and mouldy bread.

    • @AnimeSunglasses
      @AnimeSunglasses 3 роки тому +4

      "Hold my empty vodka bottle, comrade!"

    • @WojciechP915
      @WojciechP915 3 роки тому +3

      Its not strictly bad luck, but there are specific renaming ceremonies which must be performed to avoid incurring the wrath of poseidon. Assuming these ceremonies are conducted properly, its a basic, routine thing.

    • @lucianene7741
      @lucianene7741 3 роки тому +3

      USSR in 1905? Do you actually know anything?

    • @kentlindal5422
      @kentlindal5422 3 роки тому

      @@lucianene7741 I wish you luck with your surgery. It must be a terrible trial to be born without one of the senses.

    • @lucianene7741
      @lucianene7741 3 роки тому +5

      @@kentlindal5422
      Nooo, I don't believe it was that sense. It seems genuine, the same as the rotten joke you people keep circulating around the internet for years and years.

  • @tovarishchlexykaze3285
    @tovarishchlexykaze3285 6 років тому +29

    Awesome videos, Drachinifel

  • @alan6832
    @alan6832 5 років тому +6

    Though on opposite sides, the tactical situation of Potemkin in Odessa parallels that of Warspite in Liverpool 14 year later.

  • @vespelian5769
    @vespelian5769 6 років тому +14

    According to David Woodward's The Russians at Sea 1955 the Russian Black Sea battleships were equipped with internal radio for bridge to gunnery communication.

    • @Drachinifel
      @Drachinifel  6 років тому +15

      I would imagine this was probably brought in as part of the upgrades in the 1900's, which would partially contribute to the increase in fire rate.

    • @vespelian5769
      @vespelian5769 6 років тому +7

      PS I should have added in WW I. I believe it was on the initiative of the admiral.

    • @polygondwanaland8390
      @polygondwanaland8390 5 років тому +1

      Ha, I misread that as being equipped in 1955, and was confused/amused

    • @nvo7024
      @nvo7024 4 роки тому +1

      @@vespelian5769 Radio telephony emerged only after WWI; during the war, radio was limited to telegraph messages sent via spark-gap transmitters. This could not be used for intercom purposes, even in theory. I'd guess that Woodward meant something else, probably the radios connecting the fleet HQ with coastal batteries. This was deployed before WWI.

  • @igninis
    @igninis 4 роки тому +2

    @Drachinifel if you are struggling to pronounce Russian names, just use google translate text to speech and clip those into the audio recording. Just a thought.
    I never cared(nor do now) about maritime stuff, but the way you are putting information is really pleasant and that's why I am listening to your stories. I meant to say THANK YOU.

  • @DaiReith
    @DaiReith 6 років тому +25

    Great video! I love these derpy russian ships, they almost always have some convoluted or absurd story to them. Though i have to make a slight correction, you said that the best sailors were sent to the Tsushima fleet, however captains preferred to keep the best/most docile sailors to themselves, so instead they sent troublemakers, suspected revolutionaries, penalized sailors and such. I've read the memoirs of one of the survivors of the battle of Tsushima, who sailed on the pre-dreadnaught "Oryol", he mentioned how almost a 5th of the the entire crew consisted of such people, much to the horror of the ships second in command Sidorov.

    • @Feiora
      @Feiora 5 років тому +2

      I think he meant the original russian pacific fleet, then the mixed bag penal fleet...

    • @odeholon4590
      @odeholon4590 4 роки тому +2

      if you are referring to Novikov priboy Tsushima, then keep in mind that it is very much doctored to fit soviet standards, depicting tzarist regime blah blsh...

  • @derekmcmanus1423
    @derekmcmanus1423 6 років тому +4

    Interesting history for this ship!

  • @sprret
    @sprret 6 років тому +15

    Q & A - Can you talk about the various forms of torpedo protection employed by warships such as bulges and the Pugliese system?

  • @mrOL100
    @mrOL100 3 роки тому +7

    The uprising on Potemkin is one of the most interesting stories in history. I have a lot of literature on this topic, there is not everything as simple as mass history interprets.

  • @Wabeeninc
    @Wabeeninc 5 років тому +105

    Is it even Russian if it didn't have a mutiny

    • @peloi111
      @peloi111 4 роки тому +3

      Best comment ever :D

    • @angrydragonslayer
      @angrydragonslayer 4 роки тому +1

      The kamchatka didnt have any

    • @jakemillar649
      @jakemillar649 3 роки тому

      @@angrydragonslayer WhaaT

    • @angrydragonslayer
      @angrydragonslayer 3 роки тому +1

      @@jakemillar649 the SS kamchatka
      the most cursed iron ship to sail the seas

    • @USS_ESSEX_CV-9
      @USS_ESSEX_CV-9 3 роки тому +2

      I would say is it even Russian if "and then things got worse" does not apply to it

  • @terribleteddy
    @terribleteddy 6 років тому +4

    Love your content, please keep up the good work

  • @tbj1972
    @tbj1972 6 років тому +3

    More about old sail ships, eg. ships used by Columbus and Francis Drake. Great work!

  • @hhs_leviathan
    @hhs_leviathan 6 років тому +157

    Potemkin's crew: sailing to kill some imperialists under a red flag before it was mainstream...

    • @TacoSallust
      @TacoSallust 6 років тому +16

      Imperialists - What's better than some rotten maggoty food?
      Communists - My family starving to death and me getting shipped off to gulag!

    • @redram5150
      @redram5150 6 років тому +7

      bearjew what duty? The empire was no better. Russia has always been screwed

    • @charlespolk5221
      @charlespolk5221 6 років тому +14

      They weren't part of the October revolution nor were they Bolshiviks, they were part of the 1905 uprising.

    • @CzechMirco
      @CzechMirco 5 років тому +2

      @@charlespolk5221 And say, what was their ideology?

    • @joeblow9657
      @joeblow9657 5 років тому +9

      @@TacoSallust it's a trick question you'll starve under both the tsar and the Soviet Union. It's a new marketing campaign and internal restructuring but the starving never changed too much.

  • @matthewrobinson4323
    @matthewrobinson4323 6 років тому +22

    Great video, as ways. And for me personally interesting, as my maternal grandparents had escaped from Odessa in 1904. My paternal grandparents had also fled Czarist Russia about 20 years earlier. My information on my dad's side of the family is somewhat sketchy, as my grandfather died when my dad was two years old, but I believe they also lived in Odessa. Feed the crew with rotten borsht? Sounds typical for the Czar and his cronies. I remember my grandmother spitting whenever she said the word, "Russia".

    • @KageMinowara
      @KageMinowara 5 років тому +1

      Because the Tzar wanted to be deliberately cruel to his troops? They were in the middle of a war and Russia had problems getting supplies to where they needed to be. Similar things happen to any country that's at war.

    • @brucetucker4847
      @brucetucker4847 5 років тому +7

      @@KageMinowara I was taught that the # 1 responsibility of every officer is to look after the well-being of the men (and women, today) under his command. The captain may not have been able to obtain better food, but shooting men for refusing to eat rotten meat is a gross command failure.

    • @matthewrobinson4323
      @matthewrobinson4323 4 роки тому +5

      @@KageMinowara An officer's responsibility is to take care of his troops. There's no excuse for their failure to do so. If the crew had to eat rotten meat, the officers should've eaten rotten meat as well...including the captain.

    • @thatdude3938
      @thatdude3938 3 роки тому +2

      ///I remember my grandmother spitting whenever she said the word, "Russia".///
      Jews?

    • @matthewrobinson4323
      @matthewrobinson4323 3 роки тому +2

      @@thatdude3938 Yes.

  • @Archangelglenn
    @Archangelglenn 5 років тому +3

    I would personally love to see you do a review on the IJN Takao.

  • @darkhorse13golfgaming
    @darkhorse13golfgaming 6 років тому +4

    I've always wanted to see the movie.

  • @brad3154
    @brad3154 6 років тому +14

    Fun Fact : The Ship was named after Grigory Potemkin, Ekaterin's righthandman during her rule of Russia.

    • @jarmokankaanpaa6528
      @jarmokankaanpaa6528 4 роки тому +3

      Ekaterina being the Russian name for the Empress known in English as Catherine the Great.

    • @williamtell5365
      @williamtell5365 3 роки тому

      Great post thanks

  • @billboth4814
    @billboth4814 3 роки тому +3

    Its almost as if someone were writing the story of a socialist mutiny as a noir comedy. If you have seen "Gangs of New York" & wondered why the US Navy bombarded New York City, it didn't. That was Scorcese's tribute to the movie "BattleShip Potemkin".

  • @notinterested5787
    @notinterested5787 5 років тому +1

    I find the comment about rate-of-fire interesting. If a combat ship has improved fire rate over their opponent, they essentialy have more guns. I heard somewhere that Bismarcks rof was half again faster than Hood, practically speaking, 12 guns to eight.

  • @nigeldeforrest-pearce8084
    @nigeldeforrest-pearce8084 3 роки тому

    Splendid!

  • @victorydaydeepstate
    @victorydaydeepstate 4 роки тому +1

    Could you make a video on the shipyards of Nikolaev on the Bug River?

  • @davemacnicol8404
    @davemacnicol8404 Рік тому +1

    This reminds me of Dostoevsky's The Idiot. The main character references Potemkin frequently. The person of course, not the ship, unrelated but the name brings me back to 10th grade status: Grounded. 😂

  • @samstewart4807
    @samstewart4807 6 років тому +1

    A fascinating video.

  • @5peciesunkn0wn
    @5peciesunkn0wn 5 років тому +6

    from watching these sorts of videos I have come away with the knowledge that, once you have a ship design set; YOU DON'T CHANGE THE DAMN THING IF YOU WANT IT MADE QUICKLY.

  • @blastyfs2
    @blastyfs2 5 років тому +1

    I honestly had to do a double-take and hit my back button after choosing a different video before this one to see the name. At first I thought it said IRN Pokemon...

  • @sjTHEfirst
    @sjTHEfirst 6 років тому +4

    Q&A I always hear about submerged torpedo tubes but never get any details or photos.

    • @kyle857
      @kyle857 5 років тому

      Ever seen the front of a submarine?

  • @2copy3copy4cpoy
    @2copy3copy4cpoy 5 років тому +4

    KILLED OVER A BOWL OF SOUP

  • @Hardcase_Kara
    @Hardcase_Kara 6 років тому +8

    I wonder how this ship battery worked since the bow turrent was higher than the rear turrent.

    • @Wombat1916
      @Wombat1916 6 років тому +5

      Alfedo Sierra I imagine the answer is the same as that for the Dreadnought battleships with their superfiring guns.
      I actually have a model of the Potemkin. Compared to the the other ship models in the same scale it is tiny!

    • @diabeticalien3584
      @diabeticalien3584 6 років тому +1

      Id say each gun on each "level" aka the guns on the raised bow would be fired and aimed seperately from lower guns. However Id say the differebt in height was negligible.

  • @FlyTyer1948
    @FlyTyer1948 5 років тому +3

    Glad I didn’t have to pronounce those names.

  • @serjacklucern4584
    @serjacklucern4584 3 роки тому +1

    "la corazzata Potemkin è una cacata pazzesca" (the battleship Potemkin it's massive ammount of crap) the pinnacle of italian commedy

  • @MartinCHorowitz
    @MartinCHorowitz 6 років тому +4

    Q & A why does the ? slide have a black dot on the left side

  • @ironstarofmordian7098
    @ironstarofmordian7098 6 років тому +4

    QA: How would the Russian Imperial Navy do Against the US Navy in the 1910s?

    • @slimdiddyd
      @slimdiddyd 6 років тому +4

      Jorge Warcrimes Badly. The US had one of the world’s great fleets by 1910, the Russians have always had trouble at sea and it was especially bad then

    • @ironstarofmordian7098
      @ironstarofmordian7098 6 років тому +1

      @@slimdiddyd ok. Do you have any knowledge of their power projection capabilities over sea in the 1910s?

    • @ironstarofmordian7098
      @ironstarofmordian7098 6 років тому

      @@slimdiddyd how do Russian Cruisers compare to their American counterparts,?

    • @Raptor747
      @Raptor747 5 років тому +1

      The Russian Imperial Navy was such a hot mess in the 1910s.

    • @Pijawek
      @Pijawek 4 роки тому

      @@ironstarofmordian7098 none. They had badly made ships, woefully undertrained consprict sailors, many of which didn't see the sea before being drafted and very bad officers. Just look at the voyage of the 2nd Pacific squadron to Cushima.

  • @hellhound47bravo3
    @hellhound47bravo3 4 роки тому +1

    Had to look twice when I saw all the boats and their davits scattered about the ship. How the hell would you fire the guns with all that crap in the way?

  • @vadymluhansky
    @vadymluhansky Рік тому +1

    Another interesting thing about the movie "Ironclad Potemkin" - cruiser Aurora in Petersburg was refitted to play the "part" of the ironclad, and of course the movie has nothing similar with the real history.

  • @ericvandet8517
    @ericvandet8517 6 років тому +2

    how about the Connecticuts?

  • @ThePinkus
    @ThePinkus Рік тому

    If Fantozzi had only seen the Drachinifel's version, he would have saved himself a lot of troubles...

  • @misterjag
    @misterjag 6 років тому +10

    Although the leaders of the mutiny were socialists, they weren't Bolsheviks.

    • @poisonousteapot2394
      @poisonousteapot2394 4 роки тому +1

      Same shit different names just a bunch of uppity serfs that didn't know their place

    • @InchonDM
      @InchonDM 4 роки тому +4

      Indeed--the distinction between the various flavors of socialism and the State Communism that evolved in the Soviet Union is a distinction lost on a huge number of people.
      Drachinifel, I know it's not your specialty and I certainly don't blame you for avoiding the political as much as you can on a warship channel, but thank you nonetheless for taking the brief digression to point out the distinction!

    • @ObviusRetard
      @ObviusRetard 3 роки тому +5

      First of all, Bolsheviks are socialists, and secondly, in the revolution of 1905 the bolsheviks weren't that big of a deal yet, only splitting from the social democrats in 1903. Drach even says in the video that the organisation that organised the sailors was called the "Central Committee of the Social Democratic Organisation of the Black Sea Fleet", notice the social democratic in the name.

  • @sfs2040
    @sfs2040 3 роки тому

    What is it with Black Seas Fleet sailors and torpedo boats? XD

    • @BuranStrannik
      @BuranStrannik 8 місяців тому

      Their trademark B-movie villain quirk

  • @stale.bread.enjoyer
    @stale.bread.enjoyer 2 роки тому

    Where is the potemkin buster

  • @michaeldelucci4379
    @michaeldelucci4379 Рік тому

    Czar Nicolas it is said to be the person who gave her new name

  • @mogaman28
    @mogaman28 6 років тому +5

    It's a shame that wargaming hadnt released this ship in wows

  • @unutenteacaso2902
    @unutenteacaso2902 4 роки тому +2

    "...É UNA CAGATA PAZZESCA!"
    Cit.

  • @scarecrow2097
    @scarecrow2097 3 роки тому

    Me: expecting the mutiny is because of opposition to the government because of the movie.
    The real reason for the mutiny: rotten borch soup.

  • @axdesignorg
    @axdesignorg 6 років тому +1

    O L E G

  • @NotoriusMaximus
    @NotoriusMaximus 5 років тому +1

    Her movie counterpart fared so much better

  • @mr.gunzaku437
    @mr.gunzaku437 5 років тому

    I knew they utilized cement on tanks in some cases, but ships? Both seem like a waste. Cool looking ship though!

    • @roryross3878
      @roryross3878 5 років тому +3

      It's a process of treating the steel armor, not what you think.

    • @alun7006
      @alun7006 4 роки тому +3

      "Cemented" armour just means it was face-hardened steel rather than homogenous. Drach actually did a whole video on types of armour which covers this rather well.

  • @jec1ny
    @jec1ny 6 років тому +3

    Russian history is incredibly fascinating. The only drawback are all the Russian words and names.

    • @nvo7024
      @nvo7024 4 роки тому +2

      That's peanuts compared to Polish names ;)
      ua-cam.com/video/AfKZclMWS1U/v-deo.html

    • @landontesar3070
      @landontesar3070 3 роки тому +1

      I think the names are also fascinating.

  • @philipsimisker9742
    @philipsimisker9742 3 роки тому

    My grandfather was cabing boy

  • @michaeldelucci4379
    @michaeldelucci4379 Рік тому

    Her rename loosely translate to Ugly or Dirty Peasant

  • @Ellirius
    @Ellirius 3 роки тому +4

    I love Drach's content but the pronunciation of the ship's names made my ears bleed a little bit 🤣

  • @danhammond8406
    @danhammond8406 4 роки тому +1

    For some reason I saw battleship pokemon at first.....

  • @lord_igorious1426
    @lord_igorious1426 4 роки тому

    "Borets za svobodu" = "Freedom fighter"

  • @michaeldelucci4379
    @michaeldelucci4379 Рік тому

    Or infamous

  • @mannyfernandez7028
    @mannyfernandez7028 6 років тому +1

    The most problematic asset of the Russian Navy next to the Red October.

    • @roryross3878
      @roryross3878 5 років тому +2

      Kamchatka: AM I A JOKE TO YOU?!!!

  • @domenicozagari2443
    @domenicozagari2443 Рік тому +1

    The Americans helped the Japanese in the battle of tsushima . 1905 the failed communist giuda revolution against Cristian Russia.

  • @kingacres0
    @kingacres0 6 років тому +1

    Why do you employ robots to do the narration when there are very many humans with good voices who could a vastly better job? The machines often clipped off the end of sentences and fatally mispronounce many words. Also, what's with the question mark signs and the buffoonish gold-toned heads that keep popping up during the presentation?
    You obviously put a great deal of work into this project and I hate to see it compromised by the items I've mentioned.

  • @polygondwanaland8390
    @polygondwanaland8390 5 років тому +1

    I suppose it's the for the best that the Potemkin never engaged the ex-Goeben, I can't imagine that ending well for her.

  • @Galdenberry_Lamphuck
    @Galdenberry_Lamphuck Рік тому

    Least based russian battleship crew

  • @TheLiamis
    @TheLiamis 5 років тому +2

    When every decision made requires 1 litre of vodka.

  • @hedgehog3180
    @hedgehog3180 6 років тому +2

    I think you got it a bit wrong in the end, it doesn't really make sense to differentiate between communists and socialists as the two terms are generally synonymous it would have been more accurate to point out that the October revolution was Bolsheviek which was a specific communist party in Russia at the time which ended up taking the lead.

    • @andrewemery4272
      @andrewemery4272 6 років тому +2

      hedgehog3180 - The Russian Socialist (SR) party was a separate entity. At one point Socialists and Communists were actually fighting each other.

    • @8zzzzzd79
      @8zzzzzd79 5 років тому

      @@andrewemery4272 yeah,even back then the communists created the song lyric that mocked the SR right?

    • @alun7006
      @alun7006 4 роки тому +3

      The terms are absolutely not synonymous.

  • @Weesel71
    @Weesel71 6 років тому +1

    IRN SHIPNAMES - 7; Drachinifel - 0. Maybe stick with translations? (Holy Trinity really kicked butt) ;)

    • @Drachinifel
      @Drachinifel  6 років тому

      Could do, I like to at least try the actual ship names if I can.

    • @Weesel71
      @Weesel71 6 років тому +1

      Understandable. Great channel.

    • @iliavr
      @iliavr 5 років тому

      @@Drachinifel These names are not so bad if you break them down, e.g. Potemkin=Pot-ham-kin, Tri Svyat-i-tell ya, Pon-telej-mon, Imperah-tri-tsa Mariah

  • @kalinmir
    @kalinmir 5 років тому +4

    I thought that Russians had only Potemkin villages and not Potemkin battleships o.O

  • @madcyclist58
    @madcyclist58 5 років тому +2

    This was the era of the ugliest warships ever built.

    • @brucetucker4847
      @brucetucker4847 5 років тому +3

      Ugly, but kind of cool in a steampunk way. 1930s and later battleships and cruisers definitely have much more graceful lines.

    • @mrOL100
      @mrOL100 3 роки тому +2

      on the contrary, the era of the pre-Dreadnoughts is the most interesting ships.

  • @sydneymendel4115
    @sydneymendel4115 2 роки тому +1

    cheers for distinguishing between socialist and communist

  • @volodimirsci
    @volodimirsci 5 років тому

    Обманутые моряки, которые хотели усидеть на двух стульях (в революции поучаствовать, и чтобы при этом не сыграть в ящик) заслуживают жалости да понимания. А броненосец был устаревшим, впрочем чтобы с соседями воевать таких тогда хватало, ибо в Ютландском сражении Россиия не собиралась участвовать.

    • @alexgottlieb1286
      @alexgottlieb1286 5 років тому +1

      Volodimir M а в чем их обманули? Царская россия была страной дворян, а в 195 году крестьяне платили выкупные платежи за освобождение в 1861 году и конца этому было не видно, в стране не было парламена, а женщины не имели грпжданских прав ну и так далее? Почему бы было и не восстать? Они всё прекрасно понимали!

    • @volodimirsci
      @volodimirsci 5 років тому

      Один корабль не может противостоять эскадре, а что морячкам навешали на уши (насчёт самого мощного корабля во флоте) несложно догадаться. И вообще революция 1905 года с крестным ходом к царю была нормальной ?!

  • @vadymluhansky
    @vadymluhansky Рік тому

    It was also said that Potemkin's crew saw worms but is was normal spaghetti. Uneducated peasants in czarist russia had never seen such thing like spaghetti, so started riots, officers tried to calm the with gun fire, and you know the rest. Another rumour says that it was the ukrainian yellow-blue flag instead of the red one, so it was never the socialist riot but rather national ukrainian uprising.

    • @glenchapman3899
      @glenchapman3899 Рік тому

      You don't put spaghetti in Borche

    • @Galdenberry_Lamphuck
      @Galdenberry_Lamphuck Рік тому

      You'd have to be a specific kind of stupid to think any human is incapable of mistaking noodles for maggots

    • @BuranStrannik
      @BuranStrannik 8 місяців тому

      @@Galdenberry_Lamphuck Human no, a russian yes

  • @micfail2
    @micfail2 4 роки тому +3

    The Russian Navy: so incompetent they can't even sink their own ship lol

    • @mrOL100
      @mrOL100 3 роки тому

      Illiterate ignoramus! The squadron was actually in a state of rebellion. The sailors refused to shoot Potemkin

    • @micfail2
      @micfail2 3 роки тому +2

      @@mrOL100 it was a joke smart guy oh, and if you knew your history you would know that the Russian Navy has a long and well-established history of gross incompetence.

  • @johnkeenlyside993
    @johnkeenlyside993 5 років тому +2

    Quit the emojis and question marks.. they're unbecoming and hurt the eyes

  • @sheadjohn
    @sheadjohn 6 років тому +5

    that is a horrible looking ship.

  • @theauthor8901
    @theauthor8901 3 роки тому

    We’d have a lot in common, since I too never want anything to do with Communism.

  • @catriona_drummond
    @catriona_drummond 5 років тому

    sigh, could have at least pronounced it properly. Po-tyom-kin

  • @unutenteacaso2902
    @unutenteacaso2902 4 роки тому +1

    "...É UNA CAGATA PAZZESCA!"
    Cit.