It's crazy how people are having such diverse reactions to this. I can hear it just fine on my Audioengine A5's. I know very little about the subject, but think this is a great reference, if it's accurate!
Artificial stereo is a very old technique. I had a mono recording of The Limeliters: Tonight, In Person that was the original mono recording, and a later record in fabricated stereo. I'm pretty sure it was recorded mono, looking at the cover picture. I'm not too sure how they did it then, but maybe with some kind of frequency filtering and mixing? It wasn't terrible, and actually sounded quite a bit better than the monaural recording. The faux 8D, or whatever they call it now, basically generating what would be heard with a binaural recording, is really convincing..actually better than binaural, at least for locating single point moved sources. Obviously it doesn't work without headphones.
Why, what would you use? And here's a clue, the recommended settings in the YT literature flat out SUCK. Aliasing noise galore. I would guess that whatever you are listening on would swamp most of those artifacts though. Obviously I don't know that, but just a guess. That isn't subjective either, there are YT videos showing spectral frequency plots on the different settings and the resultant digitization noise.
It's crazy how people are having such diverse reactions to this. I can hear it just fine on my Audioengine A5's. I know very little about the subject, but think this is a great reference, if it's accurate!
3:46 - Dry Drums
20:52 - Dynamic Drums
Artificial stereo is a very old technique. I had a mono recording of The Limeliters: Tonight, In Person that was the original mono recording, and a later record in fabricated stereo. I'm pretty sure it was recorded mono, looking at the cover picture. I'm not too sure how they did it then, but maybe with some kind of frequency filtering and mixing? It wasn't terrible, and actually sounded quite a bit better than the monaural recording. The faux 8D, or whatever they call it now, basically generating what would be heard with a binaural recording, is really convincing..actually better than binaural, at least for locating single point moved sources. Obviously it doesn't work without headphones.
Audiophile via YooToob?? (methinks not)
My ears are giggling... this is delightful - olDEAFool 8*D
we really need timecodes for this
Is Monophonic and dry "totally boring"?
Why?
Why you said?
3:45 Dry drums
IDK if i can take this serious reading Mono Mike and the beginning. LOL, he's my neighbor. Mono Mike.
Listening in KZ ZVX
Seriously? Hi-fi from a UA-cam video with heavy compressed audio?😂
is the volume too low?!?
need some mid-range frequency
prefer natural
What happened to the volume??
volume too low
Interesting, my logitech z333 $69 2.1 set passes this in spades.... but i tilt satellites 45 degrees
Not quite my tempo.
Prefer natural.
Много текста, перед началом 👎
TERRIBLE!
Poster obviously knows zilch about audio settings.
Why, what would you use? And here's a clue, the recommended settings in the YT literature flat out SUCK. Aliasing noise galore. I would guess that whatever you are listening on would swamp most of those artifacts though. Obviously I don't know that, but just a guess. That isn't subjective either, there are YT videos showing spectral frequency plots on the different settings and the resultant digitization noise.
Too much talking.
Terrible. Just terrible
volume too low