Thank you for the tutorial. Are you planning to add another one to show the next step. a.e how to devide the reservoir to flow units based on the FZI? Thank you
FZI ends up very high results for fractured reservoirs even though facies of carbonate rock is not very good. Is FZI applicable for fractured reservoirs?
Thank You for interesting video. May i ask you a question? The rqi depends from porosity and permeability derived from well loggin interpretation? If permeability is incorrect, therefore rqi is also modeling not correctly, the question is how we could check corrrectnes of such things like permeability as initial parameter? Thank You for answering in advance.
There are different sources of Permeability, Well test analysis, RFT, Core data.. You should calibrate the permeability from logs with core data and construct a relationship between porosity permeability cross plot for each layer. We can make another video for these calibration process.
@@fanarconet The Core Permeability by Core often shows overestimation of K in fractured rocks i mean microfractured which opens in laboratory conditions and underestimation in rocks with vugs and chanels (carbonates). The Well testing i suppose is more informative, but i never use it before for This purpouse. So if you could make a video how we can adjust porosity permiabiliy relation or ?-permeability from well testing or plt data I will be extremely appreciated you help, maybe It will be interesting not only for me. Thank you for you impact in Geology and Petrophysics.
@@PyScientist Usually in the lab they choose the sample to be analysed with less vugs and fracture, so in fractured reservoir in most cases it is under estimated permeability. Honestly, no straight forward way to model permeability but you have to use the available resources. Still working on that just follow us.
thanks for sharing!
You are most welcome
Thank you for the tutorial.
Are you planning to add another one to show the next step. a.e how to devide the reservoir to flow units based on the FZI?
Thank you
+TheAzyou01 yes,
I'm working on it now
+TheAzyou01 yes,
I'm working on it now
+TheAzyou01 yes,
I'm working on it now
+TheAzyou01 ua-cam.com/video/ktFowq4yzM8/v-deo.html
FZI ends up very high results for fractured reservoirs even though facies of carbonate rock is not very good. Is FZI applicable for fractured reservoirs?
Yes, you can use it in fractured reservoirs
You can Whatsapp me for more details
+201000043187
Thank You for interesting video.
May i ask you a question? The rqi depends from porosity and permeability derived from well loggin interpretation? If permeability is incorrect, therefore rqi is also modeling not correctly, the question is how we could check corrrectnes of such things like permeability as initial parameter?
Thank You for answering in advance.
There are different sources of Permeability, Well test analysis, RFT, Core data..
You should calibrate the permeability from logs with core data and construct a relationship between porosity permeability cross plot for each layer.
We can make another video for these calibration process.
@@fanarconet The Core Permeability by Core often shows overestimation of K in fractured rocks i mean microfractured which opens in laboratory conditions and underestimation in rocks with vugs and chanels (carbonates). The Well testing i suppose is more informative, but i never use it before for This purpouse. So if you could make a video how we can adjust porosity permiabiliy relation or ?-permeability from well testing or plt data I will be extremely appreciated you help, maybe It will be interesting not only for me.
Thank you for you impact in Geology and Petrophysics.
@@PyScientist Usually in the lab they choose the sample to be analysed with less vugs and fracture, so in fractured reservoir in most cases it is under estimated permeability.
Honestly, no straight forward way to model permeability but you have to use the available resources.
Still working on that just follow us.
Anderson Paul Brown Mary Davis Sharon