MHMD [06] The 4 References to Muhammad in the QUR'AN are ALL about JESUS!

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 6 вер 2024
  • We are back again, but still ascertaining what the term "Muhammad" is, or who it belongs to, and are now turning our attention to the Qur'an itself to try to find out.
    Yet, here is the problem, the word "Muhammad" in Arabic (MHMD) is only found 4 times in the Qur'an. So if this is the name for the prophet of Islam, of whom this book should be all about, that is embarrassing.
    In comparison, the name of the prophet Moses is referred to 136 times, while Abraham is found 79 times, and even the insignificant Egyptian Pharaoh's name is written 74 times, while the references to Jesus in his many different forms can be found between 25 to 93 times!
    If Muhammad is so important to Islam and to the Qur'an, than why are there so few references to him. What is even worse, what if these 4 references are not to the Muslim prophet Muhammad at all, but to someone else?
    As we have noted in the previous episodes in this series on Muhammad, the four letters 'MHMD' was a title long before it became a name for a man, or even a prophet.
    That title could mean "The Praised One", or "Altogether Lovely", or "The Anointed One", or even "The "Messiah". And by the 7th century that title often was used when referring to Jesus Christ, at least by Christians who spoke Arabic.
    So, understanding that it was a title when the Qur'an was being created, let's then take a look at the 4 references to Muhammad in the Qur'an and see if this title fits Muhammad, the prophet from Arabia, or the Christ Jesus from Galilee.
    Mel cautions at the beginning of this episode that when we look at this title in the 7th century, we need to be aware that it could be attributed to either Jesus, or even to a Jewish exilarch (i.e. Nehemiah ben Hushiel who lived in Jerusalem) who was viewed as a Messianic figure at that time.
    With that caution out of the way, let's now turn our interest to these 4 verses in the Qur'an which state the word "Muhammad":
    Surah 47:2 - "As for those who believe, do good, and have faith in what has been revealed to Muḥammad-which is the truth from their Lord-He will absolve them of their sins and improve their condition."
    This verse is all about a 'Muhammad' who can forgive sins, which the Muslim Muhammad cannot, but Jesus can (see Matthew 4:17 and Mark 2:10), proving that this could only be about Jesus 'The praised one'.
    Surah 48:29 - "Muḥammad is the Messenger of Allah. And those with him are firm with the disbelievers and compassionate with one another. You see them bowing and prostrating in prayer, seeking Allah’s bounty and pleasure. The sign ˹of brightness can be seen˺ on their faces from the trace of prostrating ˹in prayer˺. This is their description in the Torah. And their parable in the Gospel is that of a seed that sprouts its ˹tiny˺ branches, making it strong..."
    This verse points to a 'Muhammad' whose followers follow the Torah and the Gospels, which are likely Christians. It then refers to the parable of the sowers, one of Jesus' teachings.
    Surah 33:40 - "Muḥammad was not the father of any of your men, but is the Messenger of Allah and the seal of the prophets. And Allah has ˹perfect˺ knowledge of all things."
    Mel points out that this verse in Arabic is in the past tense, so that it should read "Muhammad WAS not the father of any of your men", referring to a former 'Muhammad', or 'Praised One'; therefore it could not be talking about the Arab Muhammad of the time of the Qur'an.
    It also makes more sense with Jesus, who never married, so could not be the "father of any of your men". Furthermore, he is the "seal", or the last of the prophetic line, since he didn't marry and have any progeny. Thus, it fits Jesus better than the Islamic Muhammad.
    Surah 3:144 - "Muḥammad is no more than a messenger; other messengers have gone before him. If he were to die or to be killed, would you regress into disbelief?"
    This again makes more sense with Jesus, as it fits almost word-for-word a previous Surah 5:75, where the exact same statement is made of Isa, the Messiah, saying "The Messiah, son of Mary, was no more than a messenger. ˹Many˺ messengers had ˹come and˺ gone before him". So the
    persons in both Surah 3:144 and Surah 5:75 are Jesus.
    Furthermore, the reference to dying and being killed also fits with Jesus better than with the Muhammad of Islam, who wasn't killed.
    So, in all four examples where the term 'Muhammad' is found in the Arabic of the Qur'an, rather than immediately imposing the later Islamic Traditional narrative onto these verses, which is known as 'eisegesis', its better to read them in the context of that time and place, ascertaining what the author of these verses intended, which is known as 'exegesis'. When we do that these 4 verses clearly suggest that the better candidate for them turns out to be the Jesus of Jerusalem, and not the Muhammad of Mecca.
    © Pfander Centre for Apologetics & Polemics - US, January 22, 2024
    (101,500) Music: 'Country Girl' by aleksound, from filmmusic-io

КОМЕНТАРІ • 665

  • @OrdoMallius
    @OrdoMallius 7 місяців тому +19

    The thing that sold Muhammad is Jesus is the fact that he's called in 33:45 "bringer of good news"

  • @maxschon7709
    @maxschon7709 7 місяців тому +10

    It makes much more Sense when an Arabian Prophet called Muhammad and the four following Caliphs never existed.

    • @Frst2nxt
      @Frst2nxt 7 місяців тому

      Umar had the dome added onto the stolen Catholic Church and converted that one and the smaller Catholic Church into the two Temple Mount mosques. It actually does not make sense if they didn't exist. Daniel foretold these antichrists. Almost all of Arabia was Catholic and only by an antichrist cult rising out of the polytheist minority can account for anything at all.

  • @GizmoFromPizmo
    @GizmoFromPizmo 7 місяців тому +23

    The Quran seems to be a collection of nominally "Christian" writings without regard to orthodoxy.

    • @IslamicOrigins
      @IslamicOrigins 7 місяців тому +4

      That's correct.

    • @defenderoftruth3212
      @defenderoftruth3212 7 місяців тому

      @@IslamicOrigins ............
      What is there in the Christian writings worth collectibles? -01-27-24

    • @bhaashatepe5234
      @bhaashatepe5234 7 місяців тому +1

      @@defenderoftruth3212 well, the author of the Quran was either non trinitarian or Messianic Jew.

    • @defenderoftruth3212
      @defenderoftruth3212 7 місяців тому +1

      @@bhaashatepe5234 ............
      The author of the Qur'an has no citizenship, or belonging to any ethnic group. He is Allah SWT, my God and your God. It is Him who created you. To Him you will return. So, fear the Day when you'll be facing judgment before Him. He is the sole judge of His creation. No one else but Him. -01-29-24

    • @brawndothethirstmutilator9848
      @brawndothethirstmutilator9848 7 місяців тому +1

      Yes the Quranic theology is Ebionite, Nestorian, and pieces of other heresies that were common to Arabia/Syria.

  • @billshepherd5090
    @billshepherd5090 7 місяців тому +13

    Proving the koran is only a copy/paste religion.

  • @SneakerByNature
    @SneakerByNature 7 місяців тому +19

    It’s so Obvious, how the Quran is so corrupt and so many Errors. I strongly believe what Jay is saying that the Quran is quoting Jesus it’s all about him. Imagine he is the word of Allah, how is that not worthy of worshipping. This all make sense that they twist it, because Mohamad name appear very later in the Quran or even a Myth

    • @idris_haris_al-kalima
      @idris_haris_al-kalima 7 місяців тому

      As-salamu alaykum bismillah ar-Rahman ar-Rahim. By the way, I am a Muslim who believes in the Bible that includes the death, resurrection, and divinity of Isa al-Masih.
      'And how [is] Muhammad only a messenger, [if] the messengers have passed away before him? So [what] if he died or had been slain, ye will turn back on your heels? He who turneth back on his heels doth no hurt to Allah, and Allah will reward the thankful.' - Surah 3:144
      This is a referrance to Muhammad (or Machmad) is a prophetic name of the living temple of the body of al-Masih as seen in Isaiah 53:10, Ezekiel 24:21, Song of Songs 5:16, & John 2:21.
      'Yet it pleased al-Rabb to bruise him [ie. Muhammad]; he hath put him to grief: when thou shalt make his soul an offering for sin, he shall see his seed, he shall prolong his days, and the pleasure of al-Rabb shall prosper in his hand.' - Isaiah 53:10
      'Speak unto the house of Israel, Thus saith al-Rabb Allah; Behold, I will profane my sanctuary (or my Holy-One), the boast of your strength, Muhammad before your eyes, and that which your soul pitieth; and your sons and your daughters whom ye have left shall fall by the sword.' - Ezekiel 24:21
      'But he spake of the temple of his body.' - John 2:21
      'How [is] al-Masih ibn Mariam only a messenger, [if] the messengers have passed away before him? Yet his mother is truthful. They both used to eat the food. Look how We make clear to them the signs; then look how they are deluded.' - Surah 5:75
      Both Isa al-Masih, who is the incarnation of Logos, and his mother, who was overshadowed by Sophia, were exalted after their deaths, as Isa is seated beside Allah atop His throne while Mariam was assumed into Jannah (ie. Eden or Paradise).
      Muhammad is al-Masih ibn Mariam.

    • @AlonzoHarris235
      @AlonzoHarris235 7 місяців тому

      Is the word of Jesus also a person in the godhead?🥴🤣

    • @idris_haris_al-kalima
      @idris_haris_al-kalima 7 місяців тому

      @@AlonzoHarris235 Are you and I part of the Godhead? Isa al-Masih said to us, "be," and therefore we exist.

    • @AlonzoHarris235
      @AlonzoHarris235 7 місяців тому

      @@idris_haris_al-kalima
      Jesus is not God.
      Human beings are not God.
      If you accept logic and reason. Stop worshipping a person walking the earth as God.
      If I claim to be God. Would you believe me?
      Let’s say I’m the incarnated Christian God that came down.
      Would you believe me?
      What are your logical reasons to reject me as God?

    • @idris_haris_al-kalima
      @idris_haris_al-kalima 7 місяців тому

      @@AlonzoHarris235 I am a Panentheist, but your actions tell me that you are among the worst of creatures

  • @ailove313
    @ailove313 7 місяців тому +17

    Thanks for the dedication writing the notes in the description

  • @anthonyoctaviano7643
    @anthonyoctaviano7643 7 місяців тому +6

    Help Jay with his ministry by not skipping the add, God Bless us

    • @Packhorse-bh8qn
      @Packhorse-bh8qn 4 місяці тому

      "Help Jay with his ministry by not skipping the add, "
      Ad. Short for advertisement. Not, "add".

    • @anthonyoctaviano4926
      @anthonyoctaviano4926 4 місяці тому

      Thanks​@@Packhorse-bh8qn

  • @DannyYt-y5h
    @DannyYt-y5h 7 місяців тому +6

    I am so glad I can pray to God in my native tongue, and know that I am understood!You too a pray I your native tongue and know you are understood. Sure God understands Arabic, after all He created all languages. You can also read His word in your native language, and He will give you understanding.

    • @defenderoftruth3212
      @defenderoftruth3212 6 місяців тому

      You're right. Allah SWT created all languages. Hence, he will understand you, but you are required to recite verses in the Qur'an. -02-17-24

  • @Samsunga14-pg2du
    @Samsunga14-pg2du 7 місяців тому +6

    SUPPORT FOR JESUS CHRIST ONLY KING AMEN

    • @kawseralam5969
      @kawseralam5969 7 місяців тому

      King! Which country he ruled?

    • @defenderoftruth3212
      @defenderoftruth3212 6 місяців тому

      @@Philippians_One21 .............................
      The Verse in the Bible that made Bishop Kleopas of the Philippines convert to Islam:
      JOHN 17:3. And this is life eternal, that they might know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom thou hast sent. -02-19-24

    • @Philippians_One21
      @Philippians_One21 6 місяців тому

      @@defenderoftruth3212
      You better not to cherry pick the Holy Bible verses. It's getting outdated and exposed a lot, please use your brain more than this and innovate new ways satan is always helping you for this!
      Islam is not the truth and won't save you or anyone who converts to this demonic cult!
      You want to examine it? Well then wait you will see it afterwards! Not only you see, ever single human soul on this earth will see the Truth pretty soon! Patience my dear brother!
      Pay attention to the context if you read the Bible which I don't really think you guys ever read! Look at the the verses before the line you butcher!
      hundreds of gullible, deceived muslims like you butcher Bible verses to fit their lie and I'm not a debater, I don't have time to deal with your ignorance, I just came from having a beautiful encounter with my Lord and His angels. The reality that you all lack! So please pay attention to the context when you cherry pick the Holy Scriptures to fit your lies and deception my dear brother!👇
      John 17:1-5 AMP
      When Jesus had spoken these things, He raised His eyes to heaven [in prayer] and said, “Father, the hour has come. Glorify Your Son, so that Your Son may glorify You. Just as You have given Him power and authority over all mankind, [now glorify Him] so that He may give eternal life to all whom You have given Him [to be His-permanently and forever]. Now this is eternal life: that they may know You, the only true [supreme and sovereign] God, and [in the same manner know] Jesus [as the] Christ whom You have sent. I have glorified You [down here] on the earth by completing the work that You gave Me to do. Now, Father, glorify Me together with Yourself, with the glory and majesty that I had with You before the world existed.
      ☝️
      So if you want to know the Holy Bible don't copy paste other Dawahs deceit in the comment section I see the same comments everywhere!
      Do your soul a favor and start reading New Testament, Gospel of John from the beginning to end and finish the whole New Testament for yourself. Don't afraid to know the Truth, for the Truth shall set you free from the bondage you are in my dear brother!
      All I can do for you is to pray that the only true and the Living God to open your heart and eyes and you will see the Truth before it gets late for you!

    • @defenderoftruth3212
      @defenderoftruth3212 6 місяців тому

      @@Philippians_One21 .....................
      Unfortunately, Prophet jESUs (pbuh) has no angels. The angels that saved and lifted him to heaven were the angels of Allah SWT. All angels, with angel Gabriel as the Archangel, are all subservient to Allah SWT, and not to any prophet. No one could get near Prophet jESUs (pbuh) yet.
      Unless in his second coming to earth that he could talk, mingle with anyone. But most of the time, he will be with the Muslims, especially during the Friday prayer at Masjid Al Aqsa. As a matter of fact, he will marry a Muslim woman, have sons and daughters with her. His lifespan on earth will only be 40 years. After that, he will die a natural death. He will be buried besides the tomb of Prophet Muhammad (pbuh).
      What is saddening is that the second coming of Prophet jESUs (pbuh) is one of the major signs that Doomsday is already near. -03-04-24

  • @kongziarusu8518
    @kongziarusu8518 7 місяців тому +10

    Good job mel 👍

  • @artonkanava
    @artonkanava 7 місяців тому +15

    Great findings, may God bless your work!

    • @user-eh2pv4sc7h
      @user-eh2pv4sc7h 7 місяців тому

      Faslse work. These are just making up!

  • @hextoken
    @hextoken 7 місяців тому +14

    Groundbreaking research

  • @Tr1Hard777
    @Tr1Hard777 7 місяців тому +13

    So, Muslims were the Mormons of the 800s but even more ridiculous.

  • @tarnos4153
    @tarnos4153 7 місяців тому +10

    Would it be correct to assume if the connecting dot from here to Qutham the prophet is Ishaq / Hisham?

  • @fantasia55
    @fantasia55 7 місяців тому +10

    two bearded sages !!

  • @ishtarlew598
    @ishtarlew598 7 місяців тому +44

    The Praised One is Jesus and is with God now in Heaven.

    • @jjash
      @jjash 7 місяців тому

      God has no son, he’s not like his creation, he has messengers and prophets..one Qs for you to ponder on, if Jesus was his son and the trinity applies, what where the people before Jesus supposed to follow? Did God not inform them of how to follow Him and how can they not have known and followed his alleged son..

    • @Sportsdesire-zk4sh
      @Sportsdesire-zk4sh 7 місяців тому

      Similarly ​@jjash who moses followed n worshipped

    • @andrzejzelazniewicz8434
      @andrzejzelazniewicz8434 7 місяців тому +11

      Jesus is God.

    • @mitchpeter5718
      @mitchpeter5718 7 місяців тому +5

      @@jjashwe know historically there were no Jews in Mecca, no major trade route, no water, etc!! What do you say about all those claims in Quran and haidiths that they were there??

    • @britanikothegreat8513
      @britanikothegreat8513 7 місяців тому

      @@jjash Job 40:7-9?!. How can you know?!. Hebreo 4:12. Proverb 30:4?!. Psalms 76:1-2. Psalms 2:1-7?!. Executive decision from the Ama or Allah King of Righteousness of God. Malachi 1:11.

  • @mozi4305
    @mozi4305 7 місяців тому +18

    In the Quran Jesus Was a Holy Prophet of God ,
    But -- If Jesus was a True Prophet Then -- Muhammad of Mecca was a False Prophet ,

    • @defenderoftruth3212
      @defenderoftruth3212 6 місяців тому

      The Verse in the Bible that made Bishop Kleopas of the Philippines embraced Islam:
      JOHN 17:3. And this is life eternal, that they might know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom thou hast sent. -02-19-24

    • @defenderoftruth3212
      @defenderoftruth3212 6 місяців тому

      You must bear in your little mind that prophets are not confined only to two prophets, Jesus and Muhammad (pbut). There are thousands of prophets. And they are ALL true prophets. -03-04-24

  • @alexgader8769
    @alexgader8769 6 місяців тому +2

    In sura Alsaf, verse 6, Quran talks about Ahmad who will be prophet after Jesus. Can you tell us little about it? Thanks

    • @wisatafantastis
      @wisatafantastis 4 місяці тому +1

      According to the expert in this video, the Koran has added many verses, and it is possible that these additions occurred during the time of the Caliphs

  • @lifethroughromans8295
    @lifethroughromans8295 7 місяців тому +2

    This is amazing. Just today,
    Inwas thinking about the dome of the Rock where the inscription has nothing to do with Muhammad. In my mind, I had this thought. The Muhammad of Islam in the Quran could be different from the one in the Hadith. And, the writer of the Quran may have exaggerated on Muhammad and must be all about Christ since Muhammad somply means "Praised One" in Islam.

  • @stlouisix3
    @stlouisix3 7 місяців тому +12

    May all Praise be to👏 Our Lord 👑 Jesus Christ ⛪ Amen❤😊❤.

    • @defenderoftruth3212
      @defenderoftruth3212 6 місяців тому

      The Verse in the Bible that made Bishop Kleopas of the Philippines embraced Islam:
      JOHN 17:3. And this is life eternal, that they might know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom thou hast sent. -02-19-24

  • @michaelsullivan6868
    @michaelsullivan6868 3 місяці тому

    Concerning Sura [48] verse 29 -- notice the plant is a description of Messiah ben Joseph (Gen. 49:22) and as Mitchell points out Jesus says He is HIM in John 15.

  • @michaelsullivan6868
    @michaelsullivan6868 3 місяці тому

    Concerning Sura 33 verse 40 - Daniel 9:24-27 teaches that when Jerusalem would be judged during "the war" (AD 67 - AD 70) is when all prophecy would be fulfilled and thus when the office of prophet would stop. Jesus taught that "all that had been written" [in the OT] would be fulfilled when He came upon the clouds [through the Roman armies] in the events of AD 67 - AD 70 (Lk. 21:22-32).

  • @urbandsouza7279
    @urbandsouza7279 7 місяців тому +15

    Jay and Mel.
    I think in future more and more people convert to Christianity or buddhism mainly in South asia
    Rest will disappear in time.
    My opinion

  • @jakestevanja1304
    @jakestevanja1304 7 місяців тому +7

    Ripper. This was great.

  • @asifbrettishmaelmakki9
    @asifbrettishmaelmakki9 7 місяців тому +5

    Hi Jay.😅 I was checking Ur old video from the Jay show with Hatun.How many entities of God reflect the Quran part 2-2.
    At 12:15 mins you made me laugh 😅. It's a fairly decent an analyst.

  • @jerryk270
    @jerryk270 7 місяців тому +2

    God bless all. Amin. 🙏

  • @andrewcole4843
    @andrewcole4843 7 місяців тому +17

    Thomas Alexander's view on Sura 33 verse 40 is more detailed evidenced and convincing - that the Mhmd was part of a series of retrospective amendments for the failed political reason of blocking attempts at schism/ruler change based on being descended from an adopted son.

    • @sheikhboyardee556
      @sheikhboyardee556 7 місяців тому

      Says the clown. Alonzo believes in three gods, allah, mohammad & according to a Christian Prince video moe's pen^s. @@AlonzoHarris235

    • @IslamicOrigins
      @IslamicOrigins 7 місяців тому +4

      No doubt it is. My objective here is just to look on it at face value, looking at one layer. There is also another layer which is who the reference to the mhmd Jesus is meant to be alluded to. It is enough for now to establish this.

    • @annemurphy9339
      @annemurphy9339 7 місяців тому

      They’re both more credible probabilities than the standard islamic narrative that collapses under any investigative microscope.

    • @AlonzoHarris235
      @AlonzoHarris235 7 місяців тому

      @@IslamicOrigins
      Try to publish this nonsense in an academic article.
      You will be laughed at.

    • @garybowings1538
      @garybowings1538 7 місяців тому +2

      ​@@AlonzoHarris235"I wear panty."
      - Alonzo Harris

  • @traveleurope5756
    @traveleurope5756 7 місяців тому +2

    David Powers has a whole book on Q33:40 and how it is a later interpolation and its significance in relation with the story of Zayd & Zaynab and Muhammad being the seal of prophets etc. Most revisionists consider this aya referring to Muhammad not Jesus.

  • @billshepherd5090
    @billshepherd5090 7 місяців тому +3

    Islame is only he said that he said that he said that he said. That is called hearsay and rumors.

  • @kongziarusu8518
    @kongziarusu8518 7 місяців тому +3

    It is 2024 - happy Centenary Cairo edition 1924! 🎉 Winner = Hafs Qur’an. Losers to go into the Nile river

  • @medicalmisinformation
    @medicalmisinformation 7 місяців тому +12

    Absolutely amazing!

    • @maxxwellbeing9449
      @maxxwellbeing9449 7 місяців тому

      There was nothing amazing about this jibberish, they’ve literally proven nothing other than that they think that they’ve debunked Muhammad…. maybe so, but there is no evidence that Jesus the man actually existed either. There is no mention of the historical Jesus what so ever until 50 plus years after his so called death. Both Jesus and the profit Muhammad are mythical characters. It’s all nonsense. Dr. Richard Carrier’s research has pretty much debunked the historical Jesus as a myth. That’s what’s really amazing.

  • @kakkonah5454
    @kakkonah5454 7 місяців тому +1

    In verse QS 33:40 that says "Muhamad WAS not the father of your men but Allah's messenger" is taking about the past coz when the Muslims read verse, Allah talking about 1400 years ago. Where is Jesus name mentions there?

  • @Angel-Max7728
    @Angel-Max7728 7 місяців тому +5

    Amazing research thank you for sharing 😊

  • @wsv1975
    @wsv1975 3 місяці тому

    thank you guys so much. Such excellent research!

  • @michaelsullivan6868
    @michaelsullivan6868 3 місяці тому

    Concerning Sura [3] verse 144 - This seems similar to Hebrews 6 and 10? Jesus did "reward" those who did not "turn back" "in a very, very, little while" [in AD 70] (Heb. 10:35-37).

  • @PrinceeugenioII
    @PrinceeugenioII 7 місяців тому +2

    only 4 verse rever supposedly to mohamMAD, half the bible revers to Jesus!

    • @defenderoftruth3212
      @defenderoftruth3212 6 місяців тому

      That indicates that the Bible is man-made. It is made to make Prophet jESUs (pbuh) a god. -03-04-24

  • @rockzalt
    @rockzalt 7 місяців тому +1

    The theological overlap can be proved from the Bible. The Quran is obviously a whisper game written down but I'm still skeptical of mhmd angle as a polemic. Where are the citations from other linguistic scholars? Matthew 18: 16b

  • @Blessedishisname
    @Blessedishisname 7 місяців тому +2

    Love it ✊

  • @ribeirojorge5064
    @ribeirojorge5064 5 місяців тому

    The Universe is Not a Hierarchical Pyramid of Mathematic Quantities
    The Universe is a Holarchic Sphere of Consciousness Qualities Spheres
    Stay Awake Not Woke ❤️ 💚 💜

  • @BobMalik-j1s
    @BobMalik-j1s Місяць тому

    Fascinating!Who is Quran calling “o prophet” if the MHMD is Jesus?

  • @davidmcintosh3468
    @davidmcintosh3468 7 місяців тому +1

    I think that the "seal of the prophets" (Daniel 9:24) was John the Baptist who was the final prophet of the covenant of Sinai/Moses, we remember that fake jewish prophet Mani also called himself the "seal of the prophets.
    The "seal of the prophets" was contentious to the jews (as was Messiah Jesus Christ) as it signed the termination of their relationship with God, priesthood, and kingdom in ~33 AD.
    So the jews would "pick" many false prophets and false messiahs from this point forwards.
    EG, fake jewish messiah, Menahem Schneerson of Ukraine, said that ANYONE could be the Christ, and that the rabbis had the "special" role of pointing out the messiah to the jews.
    The "orthodox" (heterodox?) jews said that there was no "messiah", but it was a "messianic age", and gave themselves the authority to nominate any "prophet of God" or "messiah of God" that they desired.
    (can you imagine what would happen if a "faithful" jew actually read the Bible, understood it, and realized that the entire superstructure of judaism is a fraud and a human fabrication?)
    Love your work - let's keep contending for the faith once received and expose the darkness with the truth and the glory of God!
    God richly bless you all!

  • @migueliteux5061
    @migueliteux5061 7 місяців тому

    Did you ever consider that MHD could be a title filling the same role as Axios in Greek. Every emperor had to be acclaimed by the people upon his election with the people shouting Axios, meaning worthy. Bishops and patriarchs also received this acclamation as well.

  • @ingoschneuing1073
    @ingoschneuing1073 7 місяців тому +1

    ‼️ A fifth one in Sura 3.142 & 143‼️
    142 Do you think you will enter Paradise without Allah proving which of you ˹truly˺ struggled ˹for His cause˺ and patiently endured?
    143 You certainly wished 'for the opportunity˺ for martyrdom before encountering it, now you have seen it with your own eyes
    [... now you have seen Him, and (in paradise) you shall look at Him (reads the german translation)]
    ... compare with Math. 5.8 and 2. Cor. 5.7
    Arius' teachings based on apostolic scriptures....

    • @AlonzoHarris235
      @AlonzoHarris235 7 місяців тому

      You should stop your nonsense.
      Jesus is not God.
      Jesus is not Mohammed.
      That’s why you resort to fringe absurd theories. You can’t defend your doctrines. You they desperate and resort to conspiracy theories because you are theologically inferior to Islam.

  • @mohammadislam9844
    @mohammadislam9844 7 місяців тому +1

    Thanks to Michael H. Hart who buried and spitted on guys like J. Smith and David W. the top most propagandists & ignorant liars on Prophet Mohammad. His book '' The 100: A Ranking of the Most Influential Persons in History'', was a clear testimony by an unbiased Christian. Great characters like Mahatma Gandhi, George Bernard Shaw, Thomas Carlyle, Annie Besant, Leo Tolstoy, W. Montgomery found highest inspiration in Prophet Mohammad.

    • @garybowings1538
      @garybowings1538 7 місяців тому

      Lol, what about Dr. Keith L. Moore? 🤡

    • @You.are.boring.me.now2024
      @You.are.boring.me.now2024 7 місяців тому

      Yawn !

    • @defenderoftruth3212
      @defenderoftruth3212 6 місяців тому

      @@You.are.boring.me.now2024 ........................
      The Verse in the Bible that made Bishop Kleopas of the Philippines convert to Islam:
      JOHN 17:3. And this is life eternal, that they might know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom thou hast sent. -02-19-24

    • @You.are.boring.me.now2024
      @You.are.boring.me.now2024 6 місяців тому

      @@defenderoftruth3212
      I'm agnostic/atheist and your comment is totally unrelated to the original post so I would call that a swing and a miss!

    • @jesusvdelgado5401
      @jesusvdelgado5401 Місяць тому

      ​@defenderoftruth3212
      That Bishop never read the Corán or never read the Bible.
      John 17:3, doesn't speak about the ontological nature of the Father.

  • @kumarvt785
    @kumarvt785 6 місяців тому

    Then about which Prophet are various verses related to marriage and wives For ex Quran 33:50

  • @ribeirojorge5064
    @ribeirojorge5064 5 місяців тому

    Muhammad is a Title Exactly in the same way Christ is a Title !!!

  • @bapu8984
    @bapu8984 7 місяців тому +1

    Very informative 😮😊😅😂...

  • @user-ox4iu8qz1k
    @user-ox4iu8qz1k 7 місяців тому +6

    Thank you so much ❤ 😅

  • @pauljansentextor1788lx
    @pauljansentextor1788lx 7 місяців тому +2

    For me its quite clear!

  • @lindaclark6148
    @lindaclark6148 7 місяців тому +4

    BRILLIANT!

  • @texaxn
    @texaxn 4 місяці тому

    We worship the only True God, Jesus Christ Of Nazareth.❤

  • @adriandocherty778
    @adriandocherty778 5 місяців тому

    This coming from a ROMAN and ENGLISH church claiming they were anointed by god!! 😂🤣

  • @AzizMeshal
    @AzizMeshal 7 місяців тому

    Regarding Jesus: "The day I die" does not mean that he has died, rather it means that when he dies - and that is after he descends and kills the Antichrist as proven in the hadiths - he will be saved from death without faith in God Almighty, and this is as he said "and the day I will be resurrected alive" and it does not mean that he's just resurrected, as a past resurrection.

  • @britanikothegreat8513
    @britanikothegreat8513 7 місяців тому

    Romans 8:7-10. Romans 10:1-5. Isaiah 28:9?!. Hebrew 5:13. 1Corinthians 15:34. 1Corinthians 13:1-13. 2Timothy 4:6-8. Deuteronomy 18:1-2. Malachi 3:3-4. Malachi 4:2. Malachi 1:11. Hebrew 4:12. Hebrew 4:12. Jeremiah 31:31-34? Isaiah 1:18. Hebrew 8:10-12. 2Chronicles 7:14-16.

  • @rachelgore677
    @rachelgore677 2 місяці тому

    The problem is then now you will have to deal with disconnecting the perverted version of Mo who married 9 y o.

  • @carverbran1
    @carverbran1 7 місяців тому

    What about the talks of mardi will show up and jesus with him.. we dont believe it but whats info on that story

  • @jesusislove107
    @jesusislove107 7 місяців тому

    Great research n analytical expose on the Lies in Islam☪️🕋

  • @elijahsanders3547
    @elijahsanders3547 7 місяців тому

    I was thinking John 15, Jesus is The Vine, we are the branches.
    Also, on not being the father of any of your men, could it be a denial of John 1:12 - Jesus giving us power to become the sons of God by believing in His name (maybe combined with a denial of His Diety [and ignorance of how that would work The Trinity])?

    • @defenderoftruth3212
      @defenderoftruth3212 6 місяців тому

      The Verse in the Bible that made Bishop Kleopas of the Philippines embraced Islam:
      JOHN 17:3. And this is life eternal, that they might know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom thou hast sent. -02-19-24

  • @mozi4305
    @mozi4305 7 місяців тому

    God Bless You ,

  • @jakethehud
    @jakethehud 5 місяців тому

    Mel is right, that the words in Arabic are "was not" and not "is not", as everyone can see using google translate. Even if it did say is not, it still refers to Jesus, as it says was/is not the father of any of your men. Well Jesus had no children, so he could not be the father of any of the men, but the false prophet Muhammad had 3 sons and 4 daughters, so he was the father of some of the men among them, unless they didn't follow him. And Surahs 3:144 and 5:75 slams the door shut on who is being called Muhammad.

  • @7evelUP
    @7evelUP 7 місяців тому

    Is there a way to contact Jay? I have some information to share, I think he's looking in the wrong place for the answers.

  • @RobMikael
    @RobMikael 7 місяців тому +2

    Jay to surah 47:2 you MUST compare that to surah 46:31
    “O our people! respond to Allah’s summoner and believe in Him. He will forgive you some of your sins and guard you from a painful doom.”
    Now add Jesus instead of Allah summoner or caller, makes sense
    But if you read straight Quran the caller Mohammed will Forgive sins?!?! Straight Shirk 😅😅

    • @defenderoftruth3212
      @defenderoftruth3212 7 місяців тому

      46:31. O our people, respond to the Messenger of Allah and believe in him; Allah will forgive for you your sins and protect you from a painful punishment.
      46:32. But he who does not respond to the Caller of Allah will not cause failure [to Him] upon earth, and he will not have besides Him any protectors. Those are in manifest error."
      47:2. And those who believe and do righteous deeds and believe in what has been sent down upon Muhammad - and it is the truth from their Lord - He will remove from them their misdeeds and amend their condition.
      Straight shirk? Where is the shirk you are talking about in the above verses? Verse 47:2 is speaking about believing in what is sent to Prophet Muhammad (Pbuh), and that is the Qur'an. It is the truth from Allah SWT. If you believe in it, Allah SWT will remove from you your misdeeds. In other words, He will forgive your sins. It is not Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) who will forgive your sins. It's Allah SWT.
      Read with understanding. -01-23-24

  • @economician
    @economician 7 місяців тому

    Question to Mel: how do you solve the missing link with the lack of the definite particle, the al-.
    Why is it Muhammad and not Al-Muhammad if it’s a title?

    • @IslamicOrigins
      @IslamicOrigins 7 місяців тому +1

      Two tentative possibilities
      1.What's coming later in this series is that Mhmd - in the contemporary layer, ie what the biblicist material was being used for - is not a "the" but a chain of mhmds. If there is more than one mhmd it makes less sense to say "the" mhmd.
      2. The title comes first, and it then becomes how we name the figure of the mhmd. It is why we typically say Jesus Christ - Christ is equivalent as a messianic title to mhmd - not Jesus "the" Christ.

    • @economician
      @economician 7 місяців тому

      I like solution 2 and I have discussed something similar to this with leading experts in the field.
      Look at how the Pharaoh in sura 12 is titled Al Hakam, but the mosaic Pharaoh is named Pharoah/Fira’aun so many times in the Quran without the definite particle Al.
      I would love to hear more from you about option 2.
      Regarding the Quranic prophet simply named the prophet/ al naby my hypothesis is that he was an arabian prophet but not etnically arabian. Rather he was of syriac etnicity, could speak arabic fluently and became arab through marriage with different women from christian arab tribes.
      Regarding the christology of the Quran you and Jay often mix up arianism with dynamical monarchianism. See Sam Tidenman’s lecture on the development of the trinity.
      There are two hypotheses within the Inarah School regarding the christology of the Quranic authors and I would love to hear your thoughts on it.
      Luling hypothesis= quranic christology is dynamical monarchinist
      Luxemburg hypothesis= quranic christology is trinitarian or moderate arian ( similar to Sankt Ephraims christology).

    • @defenderoftruth3212
      @defenderoftruth3212 7 місяців тому +1

      @@IslamicOrigins .....................
      The name “MUHAMMAD” had already existed during the time of ADAM. So, it should be NO surprise at all if the name "Muhammad" or MHMD can be found long before he was born. Ever prophet, beginning from ADAM up to the time of JESUS, had made a Covenant with Allah SWT that they should support Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) in his mission and announce to the people about his coming. It means that the name "MUHAMMAD" had been already announced to the people since the time of Adam, him being the first man and the first prophet. Therefore, it is no doubt that the name "MUHAMMAD" had already existed long before his birth. However, the only recorded fulfillment of that covenant is the one made by Prophet jESUs (pbuh).
      61:6. And [mention] when Jesus, the son of Mary, said, "O children of Israel, indeed I am the messenger of Allah to you confirming what came before me of the Torah and bringing good tidings of a messenger to come after me, whose name is Ahmad." But when he came to them with clear evidences, they said, "This is obvious magic."
      3:81. And [recall, O People of the Scripture], when Allah took the Covenant of the prophets, [saying], "Whatever I give you of the Scripture and wisdom and then there comes to you a Messenger confirming what is with you, you [must] believe in him and support him." [Allah] said, "Have you acknowledged and taken upon that My commitment?" They said, "We have acknowledged it." He said, "Then bear witness, and I am with you among the witnesses." -01-27-24

    • @defenderoftruth3212
      @defenderoftruth3212 7 місяців тому +1

      @@IslamicOrigins .............................
      The name “MUHAMMAD” had already existed during the time of ADAM. So, it should be NO surprise at all if the name "Muhammad" or MHMD can be found long before he was born. Every prophet, beginning from ADAM up to the time of JESUS, had made a Covenant with Allah SWT that they should support Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) in his mission and announce to the people about his coming. It means that the name "MUHAMMAD" had been already announced to the people since the time of Adam, him being the first man and the first prophet. Therefore, it is no doubt that the name "MUHAMMAD" had already existed long before his birth. However, the only recorded fulfillment of that covenant is the one made by Prophet jESUs (pbuh).
      61:6. And [mention] when Jesus, the son of Mary, said, "O children of Israel, indeed I am the messenger of Allah to you confirming what came before me of the Torah and bringing good tidings of a messenger to come after me, whose name is Ahmad." But when he came to them with clear evidences, they said, "This is obvious magic."
      3:81. And [recall, O People of the Scripture], when Allah took the Covenant of the prophets, [saying], "Whatever I give you of the Scripture and wisdom and then there comes to you a Messenger confirming what is with you, you [must] believe in him and support him." [Allah] said, "Have you acknowledged and taken upon that My commitment?" They said, "We have acknowledged it." He said, "Then bear witness, and I am with you among the witnesses." -01-28-24

    • @defenderoftruth3212
      @defenderoftruth3212 6 місяців тому

      @@IslamicOrigins ....................
      The Verse in the Bible that made Bishop Kleopas of the Philippines convert to Islam:
      JOHN 17:3. And this is life eternal, that they might know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom thou hast sent. -02-19-24

  • @midimusicforever
    @midimusicforever 7 місяців тому +2

    Jesus is God!

  • @othmanahmad7331
    @othmanahmad7331 7 місяців тому

    Now you mock Quran and prophet muhammad s.a.w but in grave you will realise that islam is true but too late.

  • @britanikothegreat8513
    @britanikothegreat8513 7 місяців тому +2

    Matthew 6:9-11. Matthew 11:25..Matthew 27:46 Psalms 22:1. Amos 8:11. Daniel 12:4. 1Samuel 16:7. Proverb 30:4?!.6. Hebreo 4:12. Job 12:4?!. When you tell me that you love me?!. Psalms 144:9. Hebrew 4:12. Malachi 1:11.

  • @paladin5163
    @paladin5163 7 місяців тому +1

    BOOM.

  • @collybever
    @collybever 7 місяців тому +1

    Not sure one could easily fit Surah 48.29 to Jesus. As in "firm on the disbelievers" would not be right, and the followers "compassionate among themselves" would not be right. As in you might get those in a sect or clique, and it might indeed have good aims, and so maybe naturally distanced from people who don't buy into the group beliefs. Jesus spoke out in blunt fashion especially against the proud and self-righteous, but often also helping the weaker ones who were maybe stuck in serious sins. Jesus also taught his disciples to even love their enemies, so their compassion was not just for the clique of believers. Also its rather tying things with external pieties like prostrating, contrary to the direction of Jesus' teaching on prayer, and indeed Jesus warned about the danger of such externals, if what was happening in a person's heart was not genuine and sincere.
    Maybe its suggestive of a group, who see themselves as pious, but are rather exclusive and rather too haughty to those not in the clique. So this might suggest a history of some kind of religious movement, as Odon Lafontaine presented in his thesis, headed up by someone. They are seeing themselves as connected with Torah and gospel believers, but have a rather ritualistic idea of things, and not really knowing the gospel there.

    • @paingain3452
      @paingain3452 7 місяців тому

      I agree.
      Many hints point to religious piety in monasteries or from church service. These texts that became the Quran were both lectionnaries (qeriana) and homelies (about God and paradise,the end of times) that were transmitted [not verbally as muslims claim] and badly translated from aramaic to arabic..
      The historical arab Muhammad may have been inserted in the corpus with hadith becoming verses.

    • @defenderoftruth3212
      @defenderoftruth3212 7 місяців тому

      @@paingain3452 ...............................
      48:29. Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah; and those with him are forceful against the disbelievers, merciful among themselves. YOU SEE THEM BOWING AND PROSTRATING [IN PRAYER], SEEKING BOUNTY FROM ALLAH AND [HIS] PLEASURE. THEIR MARK IS ON THEIR FACES FROM THE TRACE OF PROSTRATION. THAT IS THEIR DESCRIPTION IN THE TORAH. AND THEIR DESCRIPTION IN THE GOSPEL IS AS A PLANT WHICH PRODUCES ITS OFFSHOOTS AND STRENGTHENS THEM SO THEY GROW FIRM AND STAND UPON THEIR STALKS, DELIGHTING THE SOWERS - SO THAT ALLAH MAY ENRAGE BY THEM THE DISBELIEVERS. Allah has promised those who believe and do righteous deeds among them forgiveness and a great reward.
      Surah 48:29 speaks about who are the People of the Scriptures which can be determined by the MARK ON THEIR FACES DUE TO PROSTRATION. In other words, the followers of Torah and Gospel are Muslims. They were prostrating to Allah SWT. Nothing in the Verse that refers to Prophet jESUs (pbuh). -02-09-24

  • @jfkt9467
    @jfkt9467 7 місяців тому

    Somg of songs 5 16 is a plural adjective... Not a singular!!

  • @avorfm1964
    @avorfm1964 7 місяців тому

    You might need to examine the NT apocryphal and pseudopygraphic material

  • @robmckay5421
    @robmckay5421 6 місяців тому

    He is a northern Muhammad not the Muhammad of Mecca and its not a name but a title.

  • @mozi4305
    @mozi4305 7 місяців тому

    A Message To You !!
    In The Quran Word " Muhammad or MHMD "" Meaning Not a Prophet's Name But A Title , Common Nou , Indefinite noun ,
    [ See-When a noun is used to refer to an unspecified or unidentified person or thing , it is Called ( the indefinite noun ) it usually has tanween ,[ ( an ) A double fathah sign ] , [ ( in ) A double Kasrah sign , ] & [ ( un ) A double dammah sign ] , at the end of the noun and is Translated in English as " a " or " an " like- a man , a student , an apple , a car , a book , a Muhammad [ Because of Muhammad "uuun " ( A Single Muhammad ) Muhammad"IIIN " ( A Single Muhammad ) , Muhammad"AAAN " ( A Single Muhammad ) But Muhammad"eeeeen , ( Plural Multiple Muhammad ) ,
    In this Point -- In the Quran Muhammad "word " Meaning Not A Person's Name , But A Title of the Prophets , Common Noun & singular & Plural Noun , & Indefinite Noun , -----
    ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~>.,,,

  • @maxschon7709
    @maxschon7709 7 місяців тому

    Abdul Malik was No Arianian, He was a "Abdul Malikian" being so full of His own to Claim He Had finished the Qurat.

  • @marcelalhind
    @marcelalhind 7 місяців тому +1

    Stop worshipping two hands on the right and one leg! He isn't gonna show his shin to you! Age of cult of islam is over wake up

  • @necmettinmutlu306
    @necmettinmutlu306 7 місяців тому

    The qur'an never mention about jesus.

  • @adairjanney7109
    @adairjanney7109 7 місяців тому

    What was his name though, im not convinced it was Jesus, Joshua Yeshua etc just convinced he walked this Earth

  • @stevenkeith5784
    @stevenkeith5784 7 місяців тому

    When you say Aryan, who and what do you mean? Where were they from?

    • @garybowings1538
      @garybowings1538 7 місяців тому

      Arius

    • @elederiruzkin8835
      @elederiruzkin8835 7 місяців тому

      "Arian" and "Arianism" after the name "Arius" (lat.; Koine Greek: Áreios), a great Christian heresiarch from the III-IV century.

    • @defenderoftruth3212
      @defenderoftruth3212 6 місяців тому

      @@elederiruzkin8835 ...................
      Arianism is the belief that Prophet jESUs (pbuh) is not equal to God. -03-04-24

  • @urbandsouza7279
    @urbandsouza7279 7 місяців тому +5

    Hi jay,when you present historical research present as historical not with religious affiliation ,it will give more effectiveness.
    Good presentations

    • @user-eh2pv4sc7h
      @user-eh2pv4sc7h 7 місяців тому

      You blind he is telling lies!

    • @defenderoftruth3212
      @defenderoftruth3212 6 місяців тому

      Do you think his teachings will lead you to Paradise? He is dragging you to go with him to reside eternally in the raging fire of Hell. -03-01-24

    • @johnathanmaweu5550
      @johnathanmaweu5550 2 місяці тому

      ​@defenderoftruth3212 aha😂,you are in hell already

  • @mozi4305
    @mozi4305 7 місяців тому

    MHMD is a Title --
    MHMD"UUN "( Single MHMD ) , , MHMD"AAAA" , MHMD"IIIIN" & MHMD"eeeeen ( MULTIPLE MHMD ) ,

  • @user-dn2cd4mb9c
    @user-dn2cd4mb9c 7 місяців тому +1

    🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏

  • @parvenderteotia8946
    @parvenderteotia8946 7 місяців тому

    Thanks mel for ur valuable thoughts but my theory is slightly different Becuase the name Jesus is much ancient the time of 1st CE,so it is very tuff to say that the person who was in first century called as Jesus.
    Yes it's true that muhamad or mdmd or Ahmad have the same meaning as praise one or the person who admire to praise from every one.
    Secondly we forgot the peoples sabians or saracens or nasirians or madians in first century.these sect was already had the presence in first century and their teacher was John the baptist.these people was also tortured by the new faith and presecuated by them from diffrent region as egypt as well as yarushelem.these peoples was got the preservation by the assiriyan kings and Iranian kings.
    As per my view they are the people who played a vital role to Islam in early days but later time they changed completely thoughts about muhamad and teaching and change it in completely political agenda.

  • @jesus_saves_from_hell_
    @jesus_saves_from_hell_ 7 місяців тому +1

    WuzZz Da DeAL! 👌😎👌

  • @islamicthinkingtv9985
    @islamicthinkingtv9985 7 місяців тому

    God has said in the Quran that most people will not believe. It is said that one out of 1000 will go to heaven. The rest will go to hell. What you are saying actually confirms that prediction in the Quran and the saying of the Prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him. All this was said over 1400 years ago.
    Truth is not judged by majority vote. However, God is protecting Islam so that no one can argue he didn’t know the truth. Everyone has an opportunity to find the truth if they make an effort and use their intelligence. Most people believe what they are taught by their parents without using their own minds. People should use their minds and do research because it is a matter of their life after death. After death there is either heaven or hell, and heaven is not free. God created this life only so that people can earn their heaven by obeying Him. People deceive themselves by thinking that they will go to heaven because someone died for them.
    God has a merit system for going to heaven. Injustice can happen in this life but not in the next one. God doesn’t have favorites. Prophet Noah, peace be upon him, will go to heaven but his son and wife will go to hell because they were disbelievers. Similarly the Pharoah will go to hell but his wife will go to heaven. The Quran gives many other examples.
    People will not go to heaven because of their family, race, nationality or color. These are criteria for this life for test purposes but God has a different grading system for entry in heaven.

  • @sl-ei8el
    @sl-ei8el 7 місяців тому

    After all these years, Jay, you're still blind
    Just open your heart
    take a deep breath
    And take it easy
    God created Adam and Eve
    Adam ate from the forbidden tree
    And God took him out of heaven to earth And warn him against Satan
    After Adam came Idris, then Noah, then Abraham, then Isaac, Ishmael, Jacob, and Joseph, then Moses, Aaron, john, and Jesus. They are all prophets of God.
    They came to tell people, “God is one, worship Him and do not associate anything with Him.”
    Finally, God sent the last of the prophets, his name is Muhammad, and the last of the books is called the Qur’an It is very easy, and God, out of his mercy for humans, has made it very easy.
    It is not rocket science
    No one died for your sins. You are the one who bears the sins you committed, and God will hold you accountable on the Day of Resurrection for your sins, and no one can help you.
    Now relax, forget everything
    read the Qur’an with an open heart, declare your Islam, and save yourself from Hell before it is too late.

  • @GThomas-qq6mp
    @GThomas-qq6mp 7 місяців тому

    Wait, Muhammed is only named 4 times in the quran?

  • @ribeirojorge5064
    @ribeirojorge5064 5 місяців тому

    Jesus Was Not White
    Jesus Didn't Die in the Cross
    Jesus Was Saved from Death on the Cross By the Clan of Holy Priestesses and Oracles
    And for Lovers of the Truth, ask me because I can Prove it with Evidence from the Bible without any effort of Faith
    How could it be otherwise... how could Love Allow the Death of Love ❤️💚💜

  • @xavierbesnard9201
    @xavierbesnard9201 7 місяців тому

    Fracassant !

  • @asifbrettishmaelmakki9
    @asifbrettishmaelmakki9 7 місяців тому

    Surah 33:40 Makana muhammadun Aba ahadin...
    With the the above full verse,the are potentially arabic roots that are hidden or more likely disguised.
    Eg Makana ,could actually be a root of MKN,and there is no, NO in that verse.An additional Alif splits and tries to disguise the Root.eg two Alif together are as one.
    Aba ahadin could be a title as father ahad.
    Lakin word as to mean BUT seem dodgy as from a root of LKN.
    In Urdu that Root is Laykin which means But.
    Kataman nabeyeen could mean an end day prophet.
    Ps.adding an Alif onto other Arabic letters does not alter the original letter.eg Lam+Alif or Meem+Alif or same as a lone Lam or a lone Meem.
    And Alif is Alpha which refers to Christ.

    • @urbandsouza7279
      @urbandsouza7279 7 місяців тому

      Who is that end day prophet

    • @asifbrettishmaelmakki9
      @asifbrettishmaelmakki9 7 місяців тому

      @@urbandsouza7279
      Kataman nabeyeen,seems to refer to the period of refering too end day prophets.maybe prophets after John the Baptist. Paul says that the church's will have First Apostles,second prophets ...

    • @urbandsouza7279
      @urbandsouza7279 7 місяців тому

      @asifbrettishmaelmakki9 don't add anything.
      Not end day ,rather end of prophets.
      Jesus is the messiah so need any prophets.? end of prophethood.
      Only jesus fits very well.
      Without lies which religion fails?

    • @asifbrettishmaelmakki9
      @asifbrettishmaelmakki9 7 місяців тому

      @@urbandsouza7279 .
      Jesus is fully man and fully god(Trinitarian)
      The verse can fully refer to Jesus,yet it can also refer to just man prophet.
      Paul could be an Aba Ahadin also.He is a father figure.
      Ps.i don't know Arabic language it's not my tongue.And yee need not tell me about Jesus as Messiah.i likely will steam roll you when it comes to Christ Jesus 😒.Use ur mouth to speak and not your arse ✝️.

    • @asifbrettishmaelmakki9
      @asifbrettishmaelmakki9 7 місяців тому

      @@urbandsouza7279 .
      The verse that says, wa ma Muhammadun ila Rasul.
      The MA is affirming that Muhammad as or is Rasul.
      That can/could refer to all Rasuls.Moses is a Rasul and Muhammad is a descriptive way of highlighting a Rasul.

  • @mozi4305
    @mozi4305 7 місяців тому

    Please Answer Me if you are a Scholar !! Please Save me and Save You !!
    What is the Meaning of [ Laaa ilaaaha illaa Allah ] ???
    See Grammar - Meccan Arabic "" Al " Meaning - "" The "" and Egyptian Arabic "" El "" Meaning "" The ""
    In This Point -- ilaaaha meaning - The God , God of Ibrahim , Ishaq , Yaqub ( Quran surah No-2 , Iaaat No--133 ) , Same as Allah = Al-allah = Allah - Meaning --The God , God of Muhammad of Mecca ,
    ilaaaha or Elaaha = El-allah = Ellah ( Egyptian or Egyptian Arabic ) = The God ( God of Ibrahim , Ishaq , Yaqub ) [ Surah No-2 , Iaaat No--133 ] ,
    Indeed-- laaa ilaaaha illaa Allah Meaning -- No Egyptian El-allah except Meccan Al-allah ,
    or No Egyptian El-allah only Meccan Al-allah ,
    or No El-allah except Allah ,
    or No Ellah except Allah ,
    or No The God except The God , [ Surah No--2 , Iaaat No-133 ] ,
    or Not The God of Ibrahim , Ishaq , & yaqub Except The God of Muhammad of Meccan ,

    Because of -- In This Point Language tick Matter , there Was Many Different Arabic State and None Arabic State too ,That Why Meccan False Prophet He did Reject The God of Ibrahim , Ishaq , & Yaqub , he did Reject Egyptian & Syrian God Call-- Ellaha or ( Ellah-ra -him or Ellahim or Ellohim ) & allah , But Except only Meccan Allah , God of Muhammad of Meccan ,,,
    ==-[[;;,,,,,,##

  • @sahinyurdan9576
    @sahinyurdan9576 7 місяців тому

    BRO MORE MOSES AND SEKIND JESUS

  • @kawseralam5969
    @kawseralam5969 7 місяців тому +1

    Jay smith don't believe the Qur'an. Why he's discussing about this. Jesus language was aramic but bible is in Greek.

    • @sheikhboyardee556
      @sheikhboyardee556 7 місяців тому +1

      Because his degrees are in religion & researching islam is a valid topic for him.

    • @morghe321
      @morghe321 7 місяців тому

      Huh?

    • @mysotiras21
      @mysotiras21 7 місяців тому

      Jay Smith is exposing the LIES of Islam, in service to Christ. BTW, if Jesus spoke Aramaic, then WHY does the Qur'an have Him speaking in Arabic??? Your argument about the Bible being in a language other than Aramaic condemns the Qur'an as well.

  • @davidabramovichkosciuszko4216
    @davidabramovichkosciuszko4216 7 місяців тому +2

    👍👍👍

  • @mozi4305
    @mozi4305 7 місяців тому

    Holy Jesus Was a MHMD and His Mum Maryum was the Maaad"onna or Maaad"yawn ,

    • @garybowings1538
      @garybowings1538 7 місяців тому +1

      "And Baby Isa made birdies from lumps of clay! They flew away!"
      - Mozi

    • @mozi4305
      @mozi4305 7 місяців тому

      @@garybowings1538 He was a God at That Time but he a Power from father God or From High God ,

    • @garybowings1538
      @garybowings1538 7 місяців тому

      @mozi4305 Baby Prophet Isa also prophesied that his life would be the same as Yahya's and other righteous Muslims which means like Yahya, Isa is dead.

    • @mozi4305
      @mozi4305 7 місяців тому

      @@garybowings1538 I Have Know Knowledge about God & Jesus Relationship But We all are the Children of god , Holy Jesus was a very special man in the earth ,he was a man of God , he almighty man of God ,

    • @bhaashatepe5234
      @bhaashatepe5234 7 місяців тому

      @@garybowings1538 The Himyarite inscription from 523 AD is the earliest source mentioning the term "MHMD" before the advent of Islam, predating the birth of the Prophet Muhammad by forty-seven years. During this period, Himyarite embraced Judaism as its official 'religion.' In this inscription, "MHMD" is employed as a divine name, akin to the biblical Hebrew term Machmad, signifying the Praised One.
      The use of "MHMD" as a divine name persisted in Andalusia (Spain) during the Umayyad rule, as indicated by a scholar's findings on materials from the Cairo Genizah. This term, with its divine connotations, suggests a continuity between pre-Islamic and early Islamic periods.
      While the Quranic "MHMD" aligns with the biblical concept, the Islamic narrative, particularly the portrayal of Muhammad as the founder of Islam, is distinct. The Quranic narrative presents "MHMD" as Rasulullah, a messenger of GOD, akin to the Angel of the LORD in the Hebrew Bible. However, the historical context raises questions about the Abbasid-era narrative, suggesting an invention of the 9th century. Additionally, the Quranic portrayal of "MHMD" as the Angel of the LORD aligns with its use in the Himyarite inscription, emphasizing a divine messenger.
      Another example of the flaw in the narrative is that the prophet, the Islamic Muhammad, invented and spread the religion of ISLAM, even though the concept of modern religion didn't exist in the 7th century. The English language adopted the term religion in 1200 AD, and according to the Encyclopedia of Islam, before the 20th century, the Arabic term DEEN was never translated into English as religion. The original meaning of the Arabic DEEN is law or judgment, just like the Hebrew term DIN.
      In conclusion, the term "MHMD" traverses historical and religious contexts, emphasizing its significance in pre-Islamic Himyarite and early Islamic Andalusian periods, challenging later Islamic narratives and interpretations.

  • @tryemc3026
    @tryemc3026 7 місяців тому

    Im laughing 😃, so you guys are substituting the name mohamad with the name jesus and building an argument. ! You're making your own version of the quran. You have to prove your argumwnt from what is binding to muslims for example jesus prays to god in the bible, so automatically he is not god and your fake religion falls apart completely

  • @9and7
    @9and7 7 місяців тому

    Are there really ONLY 4 references?

    • @IslamicOrigins
      @IslamicOrigins 7 місяців тому

      Yes, plus one for Ahmad.

    • @9and7
      @9and7 7 місяців тому

      That is almost unbelievable. Wow.@@IslamicOrigins

    • @defenderoftruth3212
      @defenderoftruth3212 7 місяців тому

      @@IslamicOrigins ..............
      Only 4 verses with the name Muhammad, and one verse with Ahmed. But majority of the verses are addressed to Prophet Muhammad (pbuh), if not referring to him. So, it's wrong to say only 4 references plus one Ahmad. -01-27-24

    • @IslamicOrigins
      @IslamicOrigins 7 місяців тому

      Addressed to him? Lol.No, those additions in square brackets don't exist in arabic. Everybody knows that. Nothing suggests it is addressed to muhammad.. that's the tafsir guiding ones interpretation. A fake interpretation. @@defenderoftruth3212

  • @Philippians_One21
    @Philippians_One21 6 місяців тому

    Jesus Christ is God Almighty. 🥰✝️🥰💖✝️💖
    Jesus Christ is the Son of the Most High. ✝️🥰✝️💖✝️💖✝️💖🥰✝️😀
    Jesus Christ will come and judge the world.😀✝️😀✝️🥰✝️🥰😀🥰✝️
    HalleluYah 🥰😀🥰✝️

  • @masudiman9556
    @masudiman9556 7 місяців тому

    God had only one covenant with his chosen people, the Jewish people, and the only Bible (Old Testament and New Testament), is the heavenly book and the gospel has come first to the Jews and then through the apostles spread to other countries and nations. The rest of the religions like Islam are not from God! other books like the Quran is not a heavenly book!
    Jesus Christ is the only way to salvation!
    Praise the Lord JESUS ​​​​Christ Amen Hallelujah

    • @defenderoftruth3212
      @defenderoftruth3212 6 місяців тому

      How unfortunate for our prophet, Prophet jESUs (pbuh). Even though it is against his will and contrary to his teachings, he was being made a man-made pagan god by the Romans as a substitute for Emperor Romulus who mysteriously disappeared from his chariot during a parade at a town plaza when a lightning struck it.
      The Romans believed that their emperor ascended to heaven and became one of the brightest stars called Uranus. And so they worshipped Uranus as their pagan god. But when the Romans made their conquest to other countries, they substituted Uranus to Prophet jESUs (pbuh) as their pagan god since Uranus did not anymore appeal well to their conquered countries.
      Under the guise of spreading religion, they thought that making Prophet jESUs (pbuh) as a front for their religious campaign, it will them make easy to convince the people to bow to them. Thus, Prophet jESUs (pbuh) became the rallying cry of the Romans. And they were successful. So, up to today, Prophet jESUs (pbuh) becomes the god of Christianity.
      Maybe, before Christianity, the Romans had thought of the idea that the name of their religion would be Romanticity, or Romanticism. But their bishops maintained the name of their religion as Christianity since they are using Prophet jESUs (pbuh) as their god. It is for this reason that no Jew in Israel, a place where he came from, did not recognize him as some kind of a divine being. Thus, the Jews maintained their religion as Judaism.
      Christianity thrived only in Rome. Hence, the name "Jesus" does not ring a bell today in Israel. If you ask a Jew today in Israel if he knows "Jesus", his answer will be a resounding NO.!!!
      To get further information on how Christianity and “Jesus” are invented in Rome, see the video with the title:
      THE CAESAR’S MESSIAH. -03-04-24

    • @masudiman9556
      @masudiman9556 6 місяців тому

      You are confused

  • @deltadom33
    @deltadom33 7 місяців тому

    It could be ebonite view of jesus

  • @mozi4305
    @mozi4305 7 місяців тому

    What is the Meaning of [ Laaa ilaaaha illaa Allah ] ???
    In This Point -- ilaaaha meaning God , Same as Allah = Al-allah = Allah - Meaning --The God ,
    ilaaaha or Elaaha = El-allah ( Egyptian Arabic ) = The God ,
    Indeed-- laaa ilaaaha illaa Allah Meaning -- No Egyptian El-allah except Meccan Al-allah ,
    or No Egyptian El-allah only Meccan Al-allah ,
    or No El-allah except Allah ,===-,,

    • @garybowings1538
      @garybowings1538 7 місяців тому

      What is the meaning of this?:
      As he was reciting these verses of Sūrat an-Najm, Muhammad revealed a revelation from Shatan:
      "Have you thought of al-Lāt and al-'Uzzá? And about the third one, Manāt? These are the exalted gharāniq, whose intercession is hoped for."
      -Surah 53:19-20

    • @mozi4305
      @mozi4305 7 місяців тому

      @@garybowings1538 Islam is a False Prophet's Religion ,Witness By the Quran ,

  • @melchiormapa3597
    @melchiormapa3597 5 місяців тому

    This is why Islam is fishy.