"TRANSATLANTIC SUPERSONIC" BRITISH AIRWAYS CONCORDE SUPERSONIC JET PROMOTIONAL FILM 24844

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 10 жов 2017
  • Produced by British Airways Film Unit, the 1976 TRANSATLANTIC SUPERSONIC is a promotional film for British Airways’ commercial transatlantic flights on the supersonic Concorde jet. The film follows several men and one woman as they depart various locations (Germany, Bahrain, Scotland, and Paris) to travel to the U.S. via Heathrow Airport. The use of British Airways’ supersonic Concorde jet allows these passengers to cross the Atlantic in just over 3.5 hours. The Concorde lands (02:25) in London at Heathrow International Airport, where it waits for passengers to board it before flying to the U.S. The passengers board the Concorde, Flight 579, and enjoy the “club-like” cabin as the jet (08:50) and the flight deck crew (09:21) prepare to depart. The Concorde takes off (09:50) from Heathrow and flies through the sky (10:37) while passengers enjoy the high-end cabin services (10:56). Twenty minutes out of London, the Concorde prepares to reach supersonic speed (12:30); the smooth transition is hardly noticed by the passengers as they Concorde climbs up to its cruising altitude of 57,000 feet (13:18). The jet reaches speeds twice the speed of sound (14:33), before decelerating as it prepares to land at Dulles International Airport (15:53). The Concorde lands (16:31) in just over 3.5 hours, having covered 3,780 miles. Mobile lounges greet the jet (17:05) and take the passengers to the terminal. The film concludes by briefly following the featured passengers on their way to their respective destinations while touting the possibilities created by halving the time it takes to fly across the Atlantic Ocean.
    The Aérospatiale/BAC Concorde is a British-French turbojet-powered supersonic passenger jet airliner that was operated until 2003. It had a maximum speed over twice the speed of sound at Mach 2.04 (1,354 mph or 2,180 km/h at cruise altitude), with seating for 92 to 128 passengers. First flown in 1969, Concorde entered service in 1976 and continued flying for the next 27 years. It is one of only two supersonic transports to have been operated commercially; the other is the Soviet-built Tupolev Tu-144, which was operated for a much shorter period.
    Concorde was jointly developed and manufactured by Sud Aviation (later Aérospatiale) and the British Aircraft Corporation (BAC) under an Anglo-French treaty. Twenty aircraft were built, including six prototypes and development aircraft. Air France (AF) and British Airways (BA) were the only airlines to purchase and fly Concorde. The aircraft was used mainly by wealthy passengers who could afford to pay a high price in exchange for Concorde's speed and luxury service.
    We encourage viewers to add comments and, especially, to provide additional information about our videos by adding a comment! See something interesting? Tell people what it is and what they can see by writing something for example: "01:00:12:00 -- President Roosevelt is seen meeting with Winston Churchill at the Quebec Conference."
    This film is part of the Periscope Film LLC archive, one of the largest historic military, transportation, and aviation stock footage collections in the USA. Entirely film backed, this material is available for licensing in 24p HD, 2k and 4k. For more information visit www.PeriscopeFilm.com

КОМЕНТАРІ • 108

  • @mylanolson4552
    @mylanolson4552 Рік тому

    Thanks! More Concorde films please!🙂

    • @PeriscopeFilm
      @PeriscopeFilm  Рік тому +1

      Thanks so much. Donations of this type help support our film rescue efforts!

  • @Frserthegreenengine
    @Frserthegreenengine 8 місяців тому +4

    I do not care in the slightest if Concorde was a commercial failure, Concorde was a technical and engineering marvel and such an amazing and beautiful looking aircraft. It successfully proved that supersonic travel was indeed possible, even if it was costly. There will never be an aircraft like Concorde ever again, it truly was an aviation icon and a well loved aircraft.

  • @petercermak4095
    @petercermak4095 Рік тому +13

    Lots of memories here. While I never took the Concord, I did arrive in Dulles from Geneva back in 1975. What a change. Huge cars with Air conditioning! We never had that in Europe. Also, after 50 years, Dulles and the access highway are so Over built. Virginia is wall to wall businesses and houses now. To see what was is a treat. Yes, it was simpler back then. I am happy to have experienced air travel before we all became Sardines!

  • @andrewshore262
    @andrewshore262 Рік тому +15

    My Dad worked for the Bristol aeroplane company in the 1950’s he was involved with early supersonic development which eventually led to Concorde. I remember hearing and seeing it flying high over the South Wales coast en route to the US…….impressive aircraft!

  • @borzak101
    @borzak101 6 років тому +21

    Got a flight on the concorde as a gift. They came to Houston and did a flight into the gulf and back, just long enough to go supersonic. Glad I got to see it up close before they shut it down. It was quite a bit after this film was made.

  • @vdochev
    @vdochev 5 років тому +14

    So 70s! Such airplane! Much romance!
    WOW!

  • @maconp1119
    @maconp1119 6 років тому +28

    That dude from "Hooston" sure is getting drunk as hell.

  • @connectorxp
    @connectorxp 6 років тому +21

    That is real food compared to the slop that they serve today. Aside from the speed, Concorde had one of the best in-flight services.

  • @JDAbelRN
    @JDAbelRN 3 роки тому +8

    08:20 Ah, yes, " and the two abreast seating". Indeed.

  • @jaminova_1969
    @jaminova_1969 Рік тому +4

    We used to watch the Concorde take off from JFK and listen for the boom! They once came to a military base in NY and offered rides. I couldn't talk my parents into a flight, but I did get to go onboard and see the interior. Years later, my sister got to fly NY to London on the Concorde. It was terribly sad to see this beautiful bird go!

  • @tom7601
    @tom7601 6 років тому +11

    I always found the "Smoking" and "Non-Smoking" areas in airplanes kind of interesting. In most domestic flights, your seating either had ashtrays or didn't have ashtrays; we all breathed the same air... :-)

  • @Jimbo-in-Thailand
    @Jimbo-in-Thailand 3 роки тому +19

    Perhaps the most spectacular part was casually strutting into the terminal, quickly and easily buying your ticket and checking in thanks to very pleasant and courteous staff, then walking straight to your gate. Even your friends and/or family could walk with you to your gate to see you off or meet you there upon your arrival. No ridiculous security checks and long queues to deal with including ridiculous restrictions on what you could carry on board. No one demanding that you take off your belt and shoes. WOW different world back then. My how the world has regressed.

    • @lisalu910
      @lisalu910 Рік тому +1

      Yeah, it was a different world back then - between 1968 and 1972 there were 130 hijackings of American airliners.There were terrorist bombings such as Pan Am 103 and of course the 9/11 attacks. When is the last time you heard of an airliner being hijacked? Do you really think the world has regressed when we have managed to make flying safer than ever?

    • @Jimbo-in-Thailand
      @Jimbo-in-Thailand Рік тому +2

      @@lisalu910 Yes, I do.

  • @trackhoe23
    @trackhoe23 6 років тому +7

    I half expected Bob to shout "More powerrrr!" or say something like "I'm riding on the fastest airliner... in the worrlld."

  • @nyccatholic2765
    @nyccatholic2765 Рік тому +4

    Fab Infomercial! Thank you! The Intro of This Jet AND this entire Era was a fantastic exciting time to be alive & well!
    TODAY'S Airline Industry and INEPT TECH is a massive INSULT to the "Forward -Thinking AND Doing" of the proudly innovative PAST.
    Time Machine.... PLEASE!!!!!!!✈

  • @kovenilluminati
    @kovenilluminati 3 роки тому +9

    5:43 Instead of taking a tristar flight from Paris - London to take BA Concorde from London - Washington, Marie La Claire should've taken the Air France Concorde from Paris to Washington and save herself the hustle. Ah, those fashion girls...

    • @Frserthegreenengine
      @Frserthegreenengine 6 місяців тому +1

      Quite a lot of French people flew British Airways Concordes. In part because BA offered a more luxurious service and also they flew more frequently than Air France Concordes. (at that time British Airways had 5 Concordes, Air France only had 4 - ultimately BA would have 7 and AF 6)

  • @Nikola16789
    @Nikola16789 3 роки тому +5

    That bus at Dulles is hilarious... 1970s...

    • @tiadaid
      @tiadaid 3 роки тому +4

      Apparently they're still using it, at least in 2016 when I arrived at Dulles.

  • @lesliespann6420
    @lesliespann6420 Рік тому +2

    Stupendous cool.

  • @nghnino
    @nghnino 6 років тому +30

    we are in 21st century and yet we still have subsonic airliners

    • @pb6198
      @pb6198 2 роки тому +9

      @William Poundstone no they arent

    • @tiadaid
      @tiadaid Рік тому +3

      @@pb6198 Yes they are.
      In the 1970s & 1980s, you'd average at least one major air crash in a month. Today they're so few and far in between, that when a major crash does occur, it became a worldwide scandal.

    • @lchaney
      @lchaney Рік тому +4

      You could say that about a lot of things. We also have the technology to completely eradicate hunger and homelessness, yet we choose not to.

    • @cokeforever
      @cokeforever Рік тому +3

      because that was a fluke, a pr move like "moon base by 1995"... passenger supersonic flight proved to be unaffordable and not in demand, when concorde was grounded it was like "oh, finally"... and exactly the same it was for soviets with TU-144 - everyone was glad to get rid of those pr-aircraft by dumping the remnants of both fleets to museums... M0.78-M0.82 at FL350 proved to be the most efficient flight mode for atmosphere of Earth

    • @neves5083
      @neves5083 Рік тому

      We will always have subsonic airliners, but now we are hopefully marching to an era where orbital and suborbital flights would be available thanks to the passenger SSTOs like SpaceX plan to do

  • @yournamehere7182
    @yournamehere7182 Рік тому +1

    I'm feeling Supersonic 🎵🎵🎵

  • @johnmorris7815
    @johnmorris7815 Рік тому +4

    Fabulous nostalgia blast, air pressure headsets, no tv screens and a bunch of galley equipment uncovered as the passengers were boarding, and to operate Concorde to any other destination than JFK became commercial suicide shortly after this.

  • @fallwitch
    @fallwitch Рік тому +1

    Back when flying was still fun and they cared about the customers

  • @Harrier20153
    @Harrier20153 Рік тому +3

    They were very lucky in the past to be able to experience supersonic flight compared to us in this advanced age who still have subsonic flight 😅

  • @Highland_Moo
    @Highland_Moo Рік тому +9

    Pretty sad that we’re decades on yet with a far lousier airline experience these days. Cancelling Concorde was a dreadful decision.

  • @bitukukuasukgremany3
    @bitukukuasukgremany3 2 місяці тому

    Love it

  • @DavidMarfe
    @DavidMarfe 11 місяців тому +1

    It made money for British Airways and if it was still flying it would still be making money. More now then ever bring Concorde back

  • @bitukukuasukgremany3
    @bitukukuasukgremany3 4 роки тому +1

    Awesome

  • @soldierslake2
    @soldierslake2 4 роки тому +3

    a total gem !!! some of the concorde footage was used in the Ruggero Deodato movie 'Concorde Affair'

  • @randallbevansr5200
    @randallbevansr5200 Рік тому +4

    The Concorde did a tour of some airports in the USA,( non super sonic) I saw it in Memphis

  • @paulreynolds7000
    @paulreynolds7000 Рік тому +2

    Did anyone notice a connection to New York via Washington, this film was from before the Concorde flew to JFK. Taking the 747 might not be quicker than the Concorde to Washington and a shuttle to LGA but its not much slower. Amusing film.

  • @tom7601
    @tom7601 6 років тому +5

    @2:54, I assume the safety wheel always deploys with the landing gear. In drag racing it would be called a "Wheelie bar." :-)

  • @eddavis447
    @eddavis447 Рік тому +4

    It's hard for me to believe that we're not utilizing this type of technology.

    • @OldsVistaCruiser
      @OldsVistaCruiser Рік тому +2

      @Michael Bigdongovic - Too risky? Only one Concorde ever crashed, and that was caused by debris on the runway.

  • @psychologixselfmastery
    @psychologixselfmastery Рік тому +1

    It just goes to show that the future does not always bring advances. here now in 2023 we are way behind our capacity for high speed passenger flights which was available in the 160's till the early 2000's

  • @johneddy908
    @johneddy908 6 років тому +5

    I hope you can find and upload a similar film about the Concorde made for Air France soon.

  • @tobypetty32
    @tobypetty32 Рік тому +1

    Around 8 minutes, you can hear an instrumental version of “Raindrops Keep Falling On My Head.”

  • @MBrieger
    @MBrieger Рік тому

    I once bought a very cheap Air France flight from San Francisco to Hamburg via Paris.
    They messed it up and I took a United Red Eye to New York.
    Got on the Concord and made my Connection into Hamburg.
    Quite a Ride.

  • @anthonyglee1710
    @anthonyglee1710 2 роки тому +3

    Nice video, but where’s Hoooston?!

  • @scdzcrx
    @scdzcrx Рік тому +3

    Did y’all see the connecting flight map? How did Kansas get so far south?😂

  • @Three_Random_Words
    @Three_Random_Words 6 років тому +4

    17:42 Nice rug!

    • @trackhoe23
      @trackhoe23 6 років тому

      Thanks for the good laugh!

  • @tiadaid
    @tiadaid 3 роки тому +5

    18:57 - on the departures board behind the United staff. The first flight is Flight 175, which is the same flight number of the first United aircraft hijacked during the September 11 tragedy.

  • @kernals12
    @kernals12 5 років тому +7

    Why doesn't Marie La Claire just fly Air France Concorde out of Paris?

    • @lebaillidessavoies3889
      @lebaillidessavoies3889 5 років тому +3

      Ahhhahh!! Yes she's clueless

    • @JDAbelRN
      @JDAbelRN 3 роки тому +3

      Service better on British Airways, perhaps 😉, or 14 minute connection time at Heathrow?

  • @paulazemeckis7835
    @paulazemeckis7835 3 роки тому +3

    I always wanted to fly on it DC ince early 80's. Never happened, never will. 😭

  • @solunasunrise
    @solunasunrise Рік тому +2

    i wanna see stuff how it flew to rio de janeiro ... that route and stuff...

  • @Jda00195
    @Jda00195 3 роки тому +4

    You can see why it was vital BA and Air France got clearance to operate into JFK to make Concorde pay. Washington at least gave it a transatlantic route but all those limousine transfers to the national airport didn’t really seem that efficient or cost effective!

    • @jackdoe3889
      @jackdoe3889 Рік тому

      Free limo service was offered at JFK too. Flew in on AF Concorde and connected with Continental from EWR. Was met at the gate and escorted all the way to curbside to the limo. Well, a rather old Town Car with a fat bloke lacking in grooming and playing some Arabic music all the way at annoyingly loud level.

    • @MillerVanDotTV
      @MillerVanDotTV Рік тому

      @@jackdoe3889that bloke was my dad.

  • @peterbradshaw8018
    @peterbradshaw8018 5 років тому +15

    An accountant's worst nightmare and an aviation enthusiast's wet dream

    • @pb6198
      @pb6198 2 роки тому +5

      It actually made money, despite what the leftists will tell anyone

    • @peterbradshaw8018
      @peterbradshaw8018 2 роки тому +3

      @@pb6198 Stop talking nonsense my party wanted to or many Tories wanted an end to it. This executive from Pan-American gave a master class on why it would fail. Look it up on UA-cam. The R and D costs were never recovered. The units were sold for peppercorn. Come and help me study for my cost accounting exams and stop talking rubbish. Or better yet pay my ACCA exam fees.

    • @pb6198
      @pb6198 2 роки тому +4

      @@peterbradshaw8018 you are talking ballocks, it did recover it's costs, in 1997 it gained back all of it, operations after that date where fully profitable

    • @pb6198
      @pb6198 2 роки тому +1

      @@peterbradshaw8018 you are talking to an already established business accounted and multiple business owner, so nice one.
      Go fail those exams buddy 😂

    • @peterbradshaw8018
      @peterbradshaw8018 2 роки тому +1

      @@pb6198 Who is, and these are your words not mine a "business accounted." Oh Richard Branson an accomplished business man admitted to not knowing the difference between net and gross. But he unlike you admitted to being ignorant of a particular fact which makes him infinitely smarter than you an established "business accounted." I have been getting grades in the nineties thus far the lowest being 92%.

  • @BeryJensen
    @BeryJensen 6 років тому +2

    urgent cable :D

  • @kovenilluminati
    @kovenilluminati 4 роки тому +7

    It's 2020. We fly subsonic....

  • @COIcultist
    @COIcultist Рік тому +1

    It's Bob "I'll have a P Bob, Holness" narrating.

    • @Rasscasse
      @Rasscasse 9 місяців тому +1

      I noticed that too
      Good old Bob

  • @randallbevansr5200
    @randallbevansr5200 Рік тому +1

    Hmm,is that '70's porno music in the background?

  • @-aussie-
    @-aussie- 4 роки тому

    How quaint

  • @j8ded
    @j8ded 5 років тому +3

    12:43 it looks like hes holding an iphone with imessage open wtf

    •  3 роки тому

      Yo vi que era una calculadora.

  • @johnathanstevens8436
    @johnathanstevens8436 Рік тому

    Well, at least I got to ride in the "mobile lounge" anyway ..

  • @rosemiller1448
    @rosemiller1448 Рік тому

    Transition from subsonic to supersonic

  • @MillerVanDotTV
    @MillerVanDotTV Рік тому +1

    Imagine spending $10k in 1970 money and fly faster than a rifle bullet for thousands of miles to have Dulles lose your luggage

  • @johnquest3102
    @johnquest3102 6 років тому +2

    $10,000 ticket (?)

  • @edmund184
    @edmund184 Рік тому +1

    what happened to the Future?

    • @Toxxx78
      @Toxxx78 9 місяців тому +1

      It's stuck in the past. 😥

  • @amazer747
    @amazer747 3 роки тому +2

    Great film. However, forgotten in the journey time is the 2 hour queue to get through customs and immigration in the US!

    • @pb6198
      @pb6198 2 роки тому +4

      Not at the Concorde lounge

  • @BulacanUMNChannel34
    @BulacanUMNChannel34 3 місяці тому

    13:00
    Stethoscope

  • @tiadaid
    @tiadaid 4 роки тому +1

    I wonder if they actually flew the actors on Concorde to shoot this video?

  • @ccc8605
    @ccc8605 Рік тому +2

    And now, almost fifty years later, we are back to boring, uncomfortable six hours Atlantic crossings ...

    • @Rasscasse
      @Rasscasse 9 місяців тому +1

      6 if you’re very lucky.

  • @derekcousins6742
    @derekcousins6742 4 роки тому

    BA in its monopoly days staff where proud to serve in all areas I know I worked their now look in the year 2020 what next with BA

  • @icecycles859
    @icecycles859 Рік тому

    Supersonic and atomic its the only way to go
    the faster you go in air the safer you are since you are putting yourself in the air less of time and airspace isnt really crowded well it is but you are all far apart imagine going on the freeway and seeing about 2 cars pass the opposite lane thats why its safer less congestion so unlike car travel where its safer to travel slower for a better reaction time its opposite in air you have to haul ass
    Mach 10 baby

  • @sdry1688
    @sdry1688 Рік тому

    All these transit bags look empty...lol

  • @anthonywilfredwong4545
    @anthonywilfredwong4545 Рік тому +1

    Oh cmon what's wrong with subsonic airliners.

    • @paulward4268
      @paulward4268 Рік тому +4

      Anthony Wilfred Wong - Nothing at all....but in 2022 - 60 years after Concorde was conceived, we should all have access to Supersonic travel by now!!!

  • @anthonywilfredwong4545
    @anthonywilfredwong4545 Рік тому +1

    I prefer the B747.

    • @paulward4268
      @paulward4268 Рік тому

      Anthony Wilfred Wong - If you needed to make a trip from Sydney to London, and it took you 12 hours instead of 24 you wouldn't.

    • @paulward4268
      @paulward4268 Рік тому

      @@Gg1118dieo My reply to the other poster was in regards to the imaginary prospect of spending 12 hours in flight instead of 24.
      But in any case, Concorde's primary market was transatlantic, not Pacific - so there was no comparison in range performance with the 747.

  • @dstuart2918
    @dstuart2918 5 років тому

    Those times are ludicrous--ad films say anything. The film is also wildly confusing with all the time quotes. A friend did NY to London in about 1984--$5000 one way. She said it was loud, cramped and Jerry Hall was on board (Jagger''s girlfriend). People hated the noise over their houses and it was really pretty ill conceived and elitist. We have to make planes that pollute less.

    • @johannesbols57
      @johannesbols57 Рік тому +6

      I bet you're fun at parties.

    • @paulward4268
      @paulward4268 Рік тому +7

      D Stuart - You forget that this project was started in a different time - the early 1960s - when high technology such as this was seen as progressive and forward looking, so it was NOT ill conceived - nothing of the sort. Yes, it probably was noisy onboard - but did you ever fly on any of the early model 727 or 737s ? or any other 60s era jets? Cabin noise was something you put up with. Jerry Hall? First Class has always been full of rich idiots being obnoxious on any aircraft. And there will always be "'Elitist" things for the rich - that will never change.
      And as for people hating Concorde flying over their houses - well most people living near any airports usually hate ALL aircraft flying over! I worked at London Heathrow for 31 years, and lived beside the field, so I know what I speak of.
      The world that Concorde was born into was not the world it ended up operating in, but thats the way life goes. Yes, modern aircraft engines pollute far less than the models that were made in 1960, and that should have been obvious before you wrote your comment. Times change, and technological improvements are based on previous experience, and there are too many people these days who think it's ok to denigrate past achievements when they know nothing of the times.
      Therefore, I think Your comments are pretty "Ill conceived", and maybe a little prior thought would've been appropriate.