Mavuika damage comparison: EM Sands vs ATK Sands (Melt ONLY) | Genshin Impact 5.3

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 27 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 36

  • @Shimansk77
    @Shimansk77  17 днів тому +8

    (No abyss buffs were used)
    EM Sands dmg: 3016584
    ATK Sands dmg: 2917989
    Final % difference on full rotation (as described in the chart) is (3.26%).
    ATK Sands deals -5.31% on Burst and -5.46% CA dmg compared to EM sands.
    (Não foi usado buffs do abismo)
    Relógio de ATQ dá -5.31% a menos na Ult e -5.46% a menos no Ataque carregado comparado ao Relógio de Prof.
    Diferença % final com toda rotação (conforme escrito na tabela) é (3.26%).

  • @VitorAntas
    @VitorAntas 15 днів тому +9

    the difference is very minor... considering how flexible Mavuika is with her off-field potential, I'd say Atk% mainstat sands is the safer, more versatile pick. If she's being used on-field, EM on reaction based teams will always perform better, but if she's enabling someone else's reaction, like Mualani or Kinich, then Atk% is overall better.

    • @Shimansk77
      @Shimansk77  15 днів тому +1

      @@VitorAntas yeah that's why i still prefer Atk sands

  • @Shimansk77
    @Shimansk77  16 днів тому +9

    I forgot to including vaporizes in comparison i apologize next video will have vaporizes comparison

  • @yanncabello6268
    @yanncabello6268 14 днів тому +2

    In the end, atk or EM sand, it doesn't really matter, go for best substats. It depends so much on your build, if you already get a decent amount of EM, ATK could be more profitable. With Wolf's gravestone, EM is probably better. Personally, genshin optimizer gives me more DPS with an ATK sand.

    • @Shimansk77
      @Shimansk77  14 днів тому +1

      Me too, i still prefer Atk sands because of versatility, the best is balancing the stats

  • @renancappelline491
    @renancappelline491 15 днів тому +2

    good video man

    • @Shimansk77
      @Shimansk77  15 днів тому +1

      thank you i appreciate it!

  • @Fushyki
    @Fushyki 15 днів тому +5

    dude, for my mavuika, the diference is about 100K,
    In uor test, mavuika has 149 EM with ATK sands, this is the difference, when u dont have EM, u will do much more damage with EM sands

  • @ARTBz
    @ARTBz 15 днів тому +2

    Considering that Mavuika has the highest base attack stats, I think it doesn't actually make a difference to put an ATK sands... an EM sands would make a better balance (I don't know if the constellations would interfere)

    • @Shimansk77
      @Shimansk77  15 днів тому +1

      @@ARTBz For constellations, her c2 gives a lot of % scaling of her attack, but the best is balancing according to your character's stats to be more consistent

  • @gabrielangelo5713
    @gabrielangelo5713 15 днів тому +1

    é importante considerar tbm que os ataques carregados tem icd então apenas algums vão fazer reação

    • @Shimansk77
      @Shimansk77  15 днів тому

      Vdd tem essa por isso ainda prefiro Atq

  • @user-ot4ly9dp1c
    @user-ot4ly9dp1c 15 днів тому +1

    Personally, I still prefer atk sands cuz it's annoying having to switch sands around whenever I switch from vape/melt to mono pyro, OL, or burning comp

    • @Shimansk77
      @Shimansk77  15 днів тому

      my thoughts are the same, besides that atk is versatile

  • @Lanso-01
    @Lanso-01 16 днів тому +6

    I think EM is clearly better as you're already full of atk buffs while having no EM buffs, mine have 4200 with em/pyro/cdmg.
    You want crit on substats, pyro and cdmg on mainstat. Bennett can't run 4ins, Xilonen is running petra and Citlali scroll, so EM is the only choice.
    However, this can change if you're using Mailed Flower or succrose instead of Xilonen, and thats worth testing
    (i'd say EM still better)

  • @marc1290
    @marc1290 13 днів тому +1

    Estatisticamente é mais fácil pegar um de ataque bom a um de prof bom. Entao a maioria vai de ataque msm.

  • @EbiSh-c7y
    @EbiSh-c7y 15 днів тому +1

    Guys its for c2 not c0 in c0 atk is better

    • @Shimansk77
      @Shimansk77  15 днів тому

      I'd say i still prefer Atk sands over EM even with c2 Mavuika because is more versatile

    • @EbiSh-c7y
      @EbiSh-c7y 14 днів тому

      @@Shimansk77 yea u doing well bro

  • @Requista
    @Requista 15 днів тому +1

    I use EM because my sub stats don't have EM, but tons of atk%

    • @Shimansk77
      @Shimansk77  15 днів тому

      That's good balancing stats is the best

  • @Dragonbuth
    @Dragonbuth 16 днів тому +2

    Is no melt and no vaporize the same??

    • @Shimansk77
      @Shimansk77  16 днів тому

      If not melting or vaporizing the dmg is the same because will be raw dmg, but if melting dmg is 2x vs 1.5x vaporize

    • @Shimansk77
      @Shimansk77  16 днів тому +1

      I forgot to including vaporizes in comparison i apologize

  • @furkanbinbas4359
    @furkanbinbas4359 15 днів тому +1

    Can you show other's build too. thx

    • @Shimansk77
      @Shimansk77  15 днів тому

      c1 Citlali ttds, bennett c6 noblesse favonia, c3r1 Furina

  • @phensanji2501
    @phensanji2501 8 днів тому +1

    is kazuha better than furina in this team comp?

    • @Shimansk77
      @Shimansk77  8 днів тому

      if you have c3 Furina she's better than c2 Kazuha, it will depends on what do you have but both at c0, Kazuha c0 is better, c0 Furina is kinda hard to fullfil her fanfare on this comp

  • @ELIOOOON
    @ELIOOOON 6 днів тому +1

    Essa comp eh mais forte que a Xilonen no lugar da Furina ?

    • @Shimansk77
      @Shimansk77  6 днів тому

      Xilonen é melhor, rotação mais fluída e o sup dela mesmo na c0 é bom ainda, só usei furina porque não tenho xilonen

  • @alevanf
    @alevanf 15 днів тому +1

    Are these tests with C2 Citlali?, cause if not, this is not useful at all, every Mavuika main will eventually have C2 Citlali.

    • @Shimansk77
      @Shimansk77  15 днів тому

      My Citlali is c1 with TTDS, I'll try her c2 and sig i hope