love this podcast, and so happy for this episode, josh is my favorite crossfitter and good dude all around. I know you like to keep variety and step away from talking too much crossfit but it would be awesome to have some episodes talking to games athletes about the games and their experiences, both old school and new school (Spealler, Chan, Bailey, Vellner, Fikowski, Camille, Fisher, Wells and many more)
Pay him!!! Despite Josh's mic being really bad, no Dre right? This was one of the best episodes ever man! Had lots of fun! Those guys are the best and really funny and not the usual crossfit duchs! I wish i could be friends of those guys!
Solid, solid. Ima go with, 1.) Brent Fikowski 2.) Patrick Vellner (i’m not Canadian btw haha no bias. Guys are just goof balls and fun to watch) 3.) Josh Bridges 4.) Rich Froning 5.) Mat Fraser 6.) Jason Khalipa
lmao at the woods scenario, i had to do something similar with a bloody .22 rifle and my dad with hes 38...just running around in the dark combing through the bush
Awsome podcast, for the first time saw something with Josh not crossfit related! I would like to see Dave Castro in the same situation, not talking about crossfit.
Chi is fast hot runny energy you feel mid word? Building too much too quickly is your familiar experience of coming up redlining or blowing up. It's also quickly gained without breath but again balance and a steady rise is key
Actually looking at the numbers, as a percentage of population the UK has considerably fewer mass murders and deaths (both terrorist related and non terrorist related) than USA does. 27:25 Not saying that josh is wrong or anything, he may be 100% correct however i've watched so many Froning & Friends that i can't help but fact check!
I don't know if that is what he meant, he would have to say that and why he felt that way. However, if someone is looking to do something bad they will always go after the targets that are easier. In the military they are called soft targets, but it translates well to the civilian world as well. For example, France is one of the most lenient countries for immigration and social acceptance of cultures. They, well mostly their innocent civilians, have been attacked by groups who targeted them because it was easy to plan and action destruction with very little fear of failure. Belgium, similar. These countries have taken advice and training from the US and now are on a higher lever of vigilance, decreasing the opportunities for terrorist to plot mass murders. It is a level of security that is not obvious to people who have no mal intentions, but is a source of hesitation to terrorist or just bad people looking for the wrong kind of attention.
Yet the largest terrorist attack happened on US soil. Intelligence services stop terrorist attacks, not Average Joe with a Glock. This is completely disregarding several mass shootings every year in the US, not saying they don't or can't happen in another country but the scale of which it occurs in the US is undeniable. That being said, I respect the right to have guns that the US has, to each their own. People in Belgium (like me) can have guns, we just can't carry them day to day.
I agree about intelligence services, but what they do with the info is what stops terrorist attacks, and that usually involves someone with a gun (sometimes a glock). What Bridges was saying is specific to our country (about gun free zones). Many people die everyday through gun violence, we just like to broadcast it around the world for some reason.
Josh I love u bro and I have mad respect for u...but the whole “soft target” thing is just wrong...these school shootings and the Vegas shooting were done by and with legally acquired weapons....not well trained military criminals,who have tactical assault training and the ability to assess targets...they rely on the element of surprise and it appears they have an axe to grind...mental illness has big hand in it....posting and maintaining active military guards rather than arming all the untrained citizens may be a better way to go ....
chilledmonkeebrains I agree that most shooters do rely on the element of surprise but attacking a soft target (no gun zones)i.e., school, concert and or mall can make the attack more survivable for the shooter. You won't find a active killer going through with an attack on a NRA convention(I'm not an NRA member lol) because the chance of survival is extremely low. I'm speaking from my previous LE/military experience. I don't think everyone should have a gun but if ones does then they should train consistently to become a well trained good guy with a gun.
G Dion ...I hear u...my feeling is :i wud rather harden potential targets by posting visually “frightening “ guards and access systems so that hostile r stopped at the gates so to speak...I have 2 young kids in early grade school so trust me when I say “once a hostile is in there will be casualties “ ...a fire fight in a grade school even with trained teachers will end badly....why not use our own to protect our own...the military consumes %75 of our budget , let some of that work here...it’s the fastest fix bcuz addressing the 2 bd amendment is going to take a long time...i know there r gud people who like guns so it will take time to make solution...in the meantime we cud quickly harden the softest targets and lessen bloodshed
chilledmonkeebrains I believe we agree on the same way forward. Left turn soft targets into hard targets with well trained resource officers/security guards.
G Dion I prefer active military presence with checkpoints as access...I drove my son (1st grade) the other day...in front was a cop in his car...parked between the cops car and the front door of the school was a hertz delivery truck...the cop cud NOT see the front door or much more than the truck...he never left his car....I’m sure he’s a good cop but that type of presence is not what’s needed...it needs to feel and be military....the guns and killing potential are so the prevention needs to match
Josh, thanks for all you've done for our country! I so enjoyed listening to this podcast.
Humble, relatable, good people, why I love the people and the sport
I really liked this episode! I have even more respect for Mr. Bridges now! Thank you for your wisdom.
love this podcast, and so happy for this episode, josh is my favorite crossfitter and good dude all around. I know you like to keep variety and step away from talking too much crossfit but it would be awesome to have some episodes talking to games athletes about the games and their experiences, both old school and new school (Spealler, Chan, Bailey, Vellner, Fikowski, Camille, Fisher, Wells and many more)
What an awesome podcast...Josh Bridges is so real and such a great guy. Please have him back soon
Podcast with all the good dudes that would be great. Elly is so funny.
You guys should start utilizing the TV when talking about things i.e. the running machine that JB was using
That was so great! Thanks
Love how the guests microphone is the most quiet.
Great talk about sports, motivation and parenthood!
Yesssss been waiting for this!!!
I’ve watched all of your podcasts, this one was my favorite!
Great episode. Josh is definitely a good dude.
Just found this podcast series. and I love it!
Hope you win this year buddy
Pay him!!! Despite Josh's mic being really bad, no Dre right? This was one of the best episodes ever man! Had lots of fun! Those guys are the best and really funny and not the usual crossfit duchs! I wish i could be friends of those guys!
Best podcast so far!
best podcast yet
Josh #bridges....will love to meet you one day to hear your stores. Team josh
nice vid, i always liked the crossfit athletes, very humble and hard working.
Please get this on Spotify so I can listen to it in the gym!
love it!!!! itd be even better with time stamps
Froning household IS NOT a place you would want to attack ... LOL that was sooooo funny
Great episode. Josh is just a good dude with a bunch of good dudes.
Andres Herrera Teleradioshalomhaiti
Josh , go on Jocko's podcast!! #MERICA !!!
Lots of great take aways.
Bring fraser and josh together..or may be fikowski and vellner..but still the best podcast ever
Now that's a good episode.
Josh is awesome!
This is such a good pod cast.
More Josh Bridges!!
This was the best!
Brilliant episode
Love Josh!!!!
Josh is the best
Favorite CrossFitters in order
1. Rich Froning
2.josh bridges
3. Dan bailey
4. Mat Fraser
5. Ben Smith
6. Brent Fikowski
Solid, solid.
Ima go with,
1.) Brent Fikowski
2.) Patrick Vellner (i’m not Canadian btw haha no bias. Guys are just goof balls and fun to watch)
3.) Josh Bridges
4.) Rich Froning
5.) Mat Fraser
6.) Jason Khalipa
I'd throw Noah Olsen on that list as well
oh....no girls. LoL
Jason khalipa?
This was awesome
Could have been 5 hours, great episode.
Fittest Moostache in Earth!
lmao at the woods scenario, i had to do something similar with a bloody .22 rifle and my dad with hes 38...just running around in the dark combing through the bush
Awsome podcast, for the first time saw something with Josh not crossfit related! I would like to see Dave Castro in the same situation, not talking about crossfit.
You should get jocko willink on here.
shabblabbat wababbalat ,,...hair tonics for thinking hair
.
Chi is fast hot runny energy you feel mid word? Building too much too quickly is your familiar experience of coming up redlining or blowing up. It's also quickly gained without breath but again balance and a steady rise is key
Mid wod***
Where did Jim hensel get that hat?
22:00 they are talking about coopers color code for combat stress
The faster 63 min, more like this.
I'd like to see josh on the jocko podcast
Josh
So can we start to bet on a second when Elly laughs
Elly, “u ever taken any drug”
Josh, “caffeine is a hell of a drug 😂😂😂”
Great episode! Let's swim sometime Josh
i cant stop staring at joshes lat
Is Jimmy from Denver? With the Rockies and Broncos caps?
see josh bridges : click
Actually looking at the numbers, as a percentage of population the UK has considerably fewer mass murders and deaths (both terrorist related and non terrorist related) than USA does. 27:25 Not saying that josh is wrong or anything, he may be 100% correct however i've watched so many Froning & Friends that i can't help but fact check!
He didn’t say anything about mass murders.
but he made it sound like a country where you can own a gun is a safer country from terrorist attacks
I don't know if that is what he meant, he would have to say that and why he felt that way. However, if someone is looking to do something bad they will always go after the targets that are easier. In the military they are called soft targets, but it translates well to the civilian world as well. For example, France is one of the most lenient countries for immigration and social acceptance of cultures. They, well mostly their innocent civilians, have been attacked by groups who targeted them because it was easy to plan and action destruction with very little fear of failure. Belgium, similar. These countries have taken advice and training from the US and now are on a higher lever of vigilance, decreasing the opportunities for terrorist to plot mass murders. It is a level of security that is not obvious to people who have no mal intentions, but is a source of hesitation to terrorist or just bad people looking for the wrong kind of attention.
Yet the largest terrorist attack happened on US soil. Intelligence services stop terrorist attacks, not Average Joe with a Glock. This is completely disregarding several mass shootings every year in the US, not saying they don't or can't happen in another country but the scale of which it occurs in the US is undeniable. That being said, I respect the right to have guns that the US has, to each their own. People in Belgium (like me) can have guns, we just can't carry them day to day.
I agree about intelligence services, but what they do with the info is what stops terrorist attacks, and that usually involves someone with a gun (sometimes a glock). What Bridges was saying is specific to our country (about gun free zones). Many people die everyday through gun violence, we just like to broadcast it around the world for some reason.
Josh moving to Cookeville??
yep
Yeah pretty sure you cant say it "fights cancer" @36:44 just ask the FDA and the supplement company
Great episode, kale salad with shame! Lol
ashwagandha, is for anti stress and relaxation
Josh on the podcast and NO GAMES stories??? More Games stories..
Keep the stache!
Great to see Josh with Rich. Elly wrecks it so much though.
25:00
At this moment Ellie realized she liked SEAL’s 😏😂
Aaaaaannnnd- subscribe.
Y’all mean to this lady lol
Please bring Sara back for an episode
Emily Hanley a long flight from iceland
Froning aint on da roids cuz of christ hahhaa
I wish it wasn't true but how can any human recover from that workload without help?
Try sleeping +10 hours a day
Who's Herb? Floor it, Harold!
Moral of the story don’t bring your wife to a podcast.
That woman is so sycophantic, just awful.
When “college athletes” compare themselves to actual vets...Smh 🙄
Ronnie Martillo are a you vet?
c,mon man....what did u expect??? afghanny marauders?? too much fox news
Josh I love u bro and I have mad respect for u...but the whole “soft target” thing is just wrong...these school shootings and the Vegas shooting were done by and with legally acquired weapons....not well trained military criminals,who have tactical assault training and the ability to assess targets...they rely on the element of surprise and it appears they have an axe to grind...mental illness has big hand in it....posting and maintaining active military guards rather than arming all the untrained citizens may be a better way to go ....
chilledmonkeebrains I agree that most shooters do rely on the element of surprise but attacking a soft target (no gun zones)i.e., school, concert and or mall can make the attack more survivable for the shooter. You won't find a active killer going through with an attack on a NRA convention(I'm not an NRA member lol) because the chance of survival is extremely low. I'm speaking from my previous LE/military experience. I don't think everyone should have a gun but if ones does then they should train consistently to become a well trained good guy with a gun.
G Dion ...I hear u...my feeling is :i wud rather harden potential targets by posting visually “frightening “ guards and access systems so that hostile r stopped at the gates so to speak...I have 2 young kids in early grade school so trust me when I say “once a hostile is in there will be casualties “ ...a fire fight in a grade school even with trained teachers will end badly....why not use our own to protect our own...the military consumes %75 of our budget , let some of that work here...it’s the fastest fix bcuz addressing the 2 bd amendment is going to take a long time...i know there r gud people who like guns so it will take time to make solution...in the meantime we cud quickly harden the softest targets and lessen bloodshed
chilledmonkeebrains I believe we agree on the same way forward. Left turn soft targets into hard targets with well trained resource officers/security guards.
G Dion I prefer active military presence with checkpoints as access...I drove my son (1st grade) the other day...in front was a cop in his car...parked between the cops car and the front door of the school was a hertz delivery truck...the cop cud NOT see the front door or much more than the truck...he never left his car....I’m sure he’s a good cop but that type of presence is not what’s needed...it needs to feel and be military....the guns and killing potential are so the prevention needs to match
Damn you’re a paranoid bunch 🤨
josh is the mannnnn!!!!!! PAY HIM
erik