Here's How a Pension Should Change Your Investment Strategy

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 3 жов 2024
  • James debunks common misconceptions about retirement portfolio allocation and explains how to factor in your pension, social security, and other fixed-income sources into your plan.
    He discusses the importance of dividends in assessing investment performance, risk capacity and tolerance, and how mastering them can help determine your optimal retirement portfolio allocation.
    Questions answered:
    How should you allocate your portfolio in retirement, considering pensions, social security, and other fixed-income sources?
    What is risk capacity, and how does it factor into portfolio allocation in retirement?
    =======================
    Learn the tips & strategies to get the most out of life with your money.
    Get started today → www.rootfinanc...
    🔔 Make sure to subscribe here to be notified for future videos!
    / @rootfp
    _ _
    👥 Make sure to connect with us on all socials below → beacons.ai/roo...
    ⏱Timestamps:⏱
    0:00
    3:34 The wrong way
    5:09 The right way
    5:14 Example 1
    7:59 Risk capacity
    14:53 Example 2
    19:05 Another consideration
    21:00 Risk tolerance
    21:40 Example 3
    22:28 The emotional side
    24:35 Outro
    Other videos we think you'll like:
    About Root: • Financial advisors wit...
    Worried about retirement?
    Start here: • Worried About Retireme...

КОМЕНТАРІ • 59

  • @DavidSmith-lp5tz
    @DavidSmith-lp5tz 11 місяців тому +60

    I count my teacher pension as a guaranteed income like a bond. Therefore we have 100% of our portfolio in stocks and ETFs with a cash holding for emergencies and 2 years of gap coverage. Dividends more than cover the gap between our guaranteed income and our budgeted spending.

    • @knightalumni
      @knightalumni 7 місяців тому +3

      That’s my plan…

    • @dforrest4503
      @dforrest4503 7 місяців тому +4

      This is very similar to what I’ve done, except I’ve got enough cash to cover about 5 years of expenses after the pension, and about the same amount in a balanced fund, Vanguard Wellington.

    • @jonathandaniels9910
      @jonathandaniels9910 7 місяців тому +1

      yea we will have my federal pension and subsidized healthcare for life, so I am thinking 5 years cash, rest VTI

  • @janetkenny4861
    @janetkenny4861 11 місяців тому +14

    Perfect timing, put my paperwork in this week for retirement in December, and start my pension in January!

  • @stevestich4991
    @stevestich4991 11 місяців тому +7

    Thanks James
    Recently retired with a pension.
    Your content is my go to for my retirement information 👍🏻

  • @erickarnell
    @erickarnell 11 місяців тому +5

    Great walkthrough with the example.
    Appreciate the discussion between risk capacity and risk tolerance.

  • @M22Research
    @M22Research 11 місяців тому +6

    Good discussion, exactly! We need their expected annual expenses/spending needs to answer this question - but they were not in the question!
    We have a similar financial structure situation, but are already phasing into retirement. Because Social Security + our Pension covers our base spending + travel/discretionary spending, we only need our retirement funds to for one time buys like cars, new roof, etc…. So we do not intend to spend much of our retirement funds - we look at them as primarily a future inheritance for our kids + perhaps helping with grandkid college expenses. In our situation, we intend to leave most of our retirement funds invested for growth + a portion in near-cash for one time purchases. If we do not anticipate needing the money, leaving it invested too conservatively would be a waste of family resources.
    The factor we will be refining - the widow(er) tax trap and and Social Security/Pension hit when one of us dies. That event might require using some of our retirement funds for routine spending.

  • @edhcb9359
    @edhcb9359 11 місяців тому +7

    So basically what you are saying is that if my wife’s pension and my social security are more than enough to cover our annual expenses that I should keep my 401k completely in stocks? Do I move it from 60/40 immediately or gradually?

  • @gabepeterson4420
    @gabepeterson4420 9 місяців тому +8

    My pension is 6200 a month net. I’m 49 and contracting my services for 85-90k a year gross.
    I only have a house note of 1,400 a month and boat at 3,00 a month.
    I really want to quit work altogether. I just have to get my spending under control (eating out, Amazon shopping etc).

    • @DebiDan
      @DebiDan 7 місяців тому +2

      We’re pretty much in the same boat although not doing any extra work and we have no mortgage. We retired a couple years ago at 54 and 52. I don’t want to stop eating out, shopping,etc. My thought is, we worked too long and too hard (plus invested wisely and consistently) to limit ourselves. This is the time to enjoy what we worked so hard to accomplish. Good luck to you!!

    • @striperkid
      @striperkid 7 місяців тому

      Take a look at maybe selling the boat, and joining a boat club instead (Freedom boat club for example). It may be cheaper going the boat club route as opposed to owning and maintaining a boat.

    • @PJBHolden
      @PJBHolden 6 місяців тому

      Why are you even listening to financial podcasts? Holy cow, you’re set for life

  • @roburb73
    @roburb73 8 місяців тому +4

    I don't know if I missed it, but they didn't let you know both of their pensions are inflation protected and will increase with inflation. I'm a military retiree with a really good VA disability compensation and my wife is a Federal Government employee who will also have a pension. If I use a 2.5% inflation rate between now ( I'm collecting mine) and when she will collect hers, we will have, sans Social Security, about $15k a month in pension income. This allows us to be 100% stocks today, tomorrow, and in and through retirement! I don't intend to have any bonds, etc! We have plenty of income and investments, just as this couple does!

  • @sandylamba2546
    @sandylamba2546 11 місяців тому +3

    Excellent information as usual!! I really appreciate your expertise, especially factoring pensions, social security and investment accounts.

  • @KVT-gr9we
    @KVT-gr9we 10 місяців тому +3

    Very good information, thanks

  • @richardallen6432
    @richardallen6432 11 місяців тому +2

    Just got done telling some folks today how my retirement will work due to me having 2 pensions, SS, a small pension from my state, 2 traditional 401k's, etc. I treat my fixed income sources like bonds, and am trying to figure out how much of my traditional 401k's I want to possibly Roth convert.

  • @robertknight9506
    @robertknight9506 7 місяців тому

    I treat my pension exactly like a bond. I also have a DROP account that is exactly the same. 456b is 100% equity.

  • @jianpinghan3055
    @jianpinghan3055 11 місяців тому +1

    Excellent as always

  • @brfulcher
    @brfulcher 10 місяців тому

    Wow, really good info on a topic I haven't seen covered much as well as being very pertinent to me.

  • @RB-hl3ux
    @RB-hl3ux 7 місяців тому

    😊lookin Good😊
    Great podcast & Information, Thanks 🎉

  • @Muriel-1112
    @Muriel-1112 11 місяців тому +1

    Excellent video, very informative

  • @danhowell3574
    @danhowell3574 10 місяців тому +2

    I am mostly stocks at the moment. A few years from retirement, I plan to stop reinvesting my dividends to build up cash in each retirement account. My goal is 2yrs of cash (making interest) in each retirement account. This along with my pension should be easily make it through big 30-40% drops/recoveries, with the ability to buy the market low if the opportunity is right.

  • @FIRE_DrNinjaTurtle
    @FIRE_DrNinjaTurtle 11 місяців тому +4

    I am on a pension, so this is a perfect episode.

  • @andylewis5662
    @andylewis5662 11 місяців тому

    Excellent show, again. Thank you.

    • @RootFP
      @RootFP  11 місяців тому

      Thank you

  • @sknorling
    @sknorling 9 місяців тому

    Great podcast! Question for you- how would you classify rental income we receive?

  • @howellwong11
    @howellwong11 10 місяців тому +5

    My pension and SS is enough to cover my living expenses. My house is paid for and I have no debts. My assets is mainly in cash and money market and I have neglected them in my 23 years of retirement. I just worry about my health and not my wealth.

    • @gieb6428
      @gieb6428 7 місяців тому

      I have done exactly the same thing for the past ten years.

  • @scottbaker9066
    @scottbaker9066 11 місяців тому +3

    Risk is loss of purchasing power over a decade. So stocks (10%/year) are far better than bonds ... which are better than nothing.
    I think of my Social Security & pension as a bond fund and my QQQM as a cash machine!

    • @gg80108
      @gg80108 6 місяців тому

      except with high interest rates, long bond capital appreciation is a surer bet than stocks for upcoming capital gains when rates decline.

  • @timandcindyjacobson2953
    @timandcindyjacobson2953 11 місяців тому +5

    Enjoy the podcast. However, I disagree that a retiree (us) can be invested 100% in stocks during retirement if you have a pension, regardless of age. The big issue you ignore are RMDs when you hit 73, 74, 75 in the coming years. When your RMDs kick in, you will forced to take out assets and, thus, in a stock market that plummets 46% in one year, you’re forced taking your RMD from stocks. That’s why 5 years in cash/bonds is a must, especially when your age dictates RMDs.

    • @RootFP
      @RootFP  11 місяців тому +19

      I don't think a 100% stock portfolio is right for most retirees. But in your example what's stopping you from taking those RMDs and reinvesting them in a non retirement account? In a 46% plummet you're selling but then you're rebuying.

    • @timandcindyjacobson2953
      @timandcindyjacobson2953 11 місяців тому +3

      You’re correct, IF your plan is to reinvest vs. taking the cash to live on. In our case, the RMD’s will be used in our year-end annual cash flow to not only fund QCD’s, but also cash to children/grandchildren.
      But I’m sure there are listeners who reinvest their RMDs, it’s just not in our plan. Mind you, we’re 9 years from taking RMD’s at 74, so maybe our perspective will change.

    • @striperkid
      @striperkid 7 місяців тому

      @@timandcindyjacobson2953 I'm retiring at age 56 with a pension. I plan to start doing a Roth conversion (from my 457b) at age 59.5 until I reach age 65 (when I plan to collect SS). My thought process is not to have to deal with RMD's and those taxes in my later years. I'll pay those taxes before I collect SS. As I convert my 457b to a Roth, I'll do a 90/10 split (90% stocks, ETF's and 10% bonds)

  • @shep68
    @shep68 9 місяців тому +1

    Which is why I adhere to the 200 Day MA rule. As long as the Index is above its 200MA I stand pat. If it drops below and continues its downtrend I move to cash or bonds. This limits losses to 10-20% depending. Once the Index crosses back above the 200MA, buy back in. This worked for me in 2007-8 and from 2020-2023 during the covid swings. I did not suffer the 20-45% losses that occurred during each.
    Also the problem with the TSP is dividends get baked into fund share prices so you never really derive an “income” stream if you stay in it. This is why many transfer their tsp to an IRA after they retire. I plan to leave some in it for a monthly payment and move the larger portion to an IRA.

    • @rayzerot
      @rayzerot 8 місяців тому +1

      I'm confused. Yes, your portfolio does experience the same temporary drop as everyone else, but aren't you locking in losses?

    • @josephroberts7374
      @josephroberts7374 6 місяців тому +1

      That sounds a lot like timing the market, which is has been proven, to be next to impossible. You're at least losing, at minimum, 3-5% each time you do this. Also, if this is in an IRA, no tax issues, but if in a brokerage account, you're creating a possible taxable situation, which will cost you more money. Better to just let it ride, but have some cash/non-stock liquid assets that cover 2-3 years of living expenses, to ride out the down periods.

  • @williamrogers1219
    @williamrogers1219 8 місяців тому

    Social Security and pensions are not bonds as the payments end on your or your spouse's death. Other fixed-income investments can be inherited by beneficiaries. Social Security and pensions are incomes that should be matched to liabilities, with the difference between "guaranteed income streams" and liabilities to be matched to the investment portfolio. High-yield bonds have equity-like risk which shows up at the wrong time. Bonds should be high-quality and short to intermediate-term maturities. These types of high-quality bonds have a low to negative correlation with equities.

  • @markwalters7498
    @markwalters7498 9 місяців тому +3

    Ouch on the pulsating circle. Distracting and annoying

    • @marilynm2086
      @marilynm2086 7 місяців тому

      I had to stop watching because of it!

  • @WOV49
    @WOV49 10 місяців тому +3

    3.5 minutes of pre-ramble. How about just getting to the point.

  • @gg80108
    @gg80108 6 місяців тому

    Risk risk risk if you dont put a number on it your fooling youself! Figure out how much income you need from the market and do not invest a penny more in equities. Its also better to invest 1/2 your market money in a 9% dividend then go for the the 4% ers. The cash lowers the beta of you portfolio by 1/2, and will make you feel better since when the black swan comes all stocks sink. You need so money to pick up bargins.

  • @blackfiree91
    @blackfiree91 7 місяців тому

    Oh you dont have the capacity? Just have 2 years of cash and stay 90% stocks. Durrpa durkkka durrr. Better yet buy 10% bitcoin and own the best yielding asset over the last decade.

  • @jamesmorris913
    @jamesmorris913 8 місяців тому

    I think that most people are FAR too complacent about so-called "guaranteed" pensions, and even Social Security. The comments here, suggest that, clearly. From people I've known throughout my life, from all sorts of different backgrounds; the most "secure" are NOT people who sit around with the illusion of security, that they derive from the thought that some governmental entity is going to provide them with their "daily bread", once they are no longer working; but people who have worked VERY hard, lived below their means; and avoided stupid, wasteful behavior, for the entirety of their working lives. Then..they have built respectable net-worth, by prudently building potfolios consisting of businesses, stock-portfolios, and real estate; with the money that everyone around them was always WASTING.

    • @striperkid
      @striperkid 7 місяців тому +5

      @jamesmorris913 wait, what? Are you saying people who worked in a pensionable job didn't work as hard as others who worked in the private sector and are going to sit back with a false illusion the Govt will take care of them? Nothing is guaranteed in life with the exception of taxes and death. In life, you have to have a plan A, plan B, and a plan C. I have a job with a pension (plan A). I have investments (plan B). I have Social Security (plan C), and if need be, I have many talents that can generate income if plans A, B, and C fail. If that doesn't work, I can sell/trade off everything I own.

    • @gg80108
      @gg80108 6 місяців тому +1

      Goverment workers made the high lifestyle you enjoy, and your still speaking English. Through a stable country the gov takes about 90% credit for your so called self made wealth. Try what you did in another county such as Mexico.

  • @brentlorrilliere6057
    @brentlorrilliere6057 11 місяців тому +2

    I always love to take my retirement advice from middle aged white men with lots of acronyms behind their names. This one isn't even old enough to remember life before QE....was still in diapers. Anyone agreeing with him in the comments is just confirming their "confirmation bias".