Andrew Moravcsik: The End of the EU? - Munich Talks - 16.02.2017

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 27 жов 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 11

  • @simonsaysno
    @simonsaysno 2 роки тому +1

    15:54 So it is distasteful and immoral to close borders? I guess *everyone* is free to crash at Professor Moravcsik's place.

  • @dirkgonthier101
    @dirkgonthier101 6 років тому +2

    Right! The EU needs a plan to make it possible for some meber-states to withdraw from the euro. After all, the way that the Romantic countries have always dealt with economical hardships is by devaluating their currencies. They're not used to work with a hard currency as the Germanic pleoples do. Furthermore, the EU must integrate its electricity networks (build high voltage lines across the Pyrenees and Alps) so it can invest in the Romantic countries to develop solar power plants which can help the Germanic countries to reach their obligations for the Paris agreement.

    • @tarassamolyuk1659
      @tarassamolyuk1659 4 роки тому

      Leave us alone ... Ukraine is the big and greatest country , you fuck leave us alone .... we are the biggest ...

  • @andrehangout8305
    @andrehangout8305 5 років тому +1

    Moravcsik analysis is correct and this is well understood while not talked about. He believes in realism and a mere positive narrative but in reality we complain because there is no point to appraise, and what I really find annoying is the enshrined positivity of the US political culture. If there is no problem, what is the point of doing politics? Negativity is a cultural issue. A Swabian Not bad means excellent. Self-appraisal is awkward and mirrors low provenience. Negativity and modest appraisal is an understatement and the only way to perfection is to talk about what goes wrong and improve it. Mediocre theatres get positive reviews by the local newspapers. Ivory league theatres get sharp criticism because it simply matters what they do on stage. We do not have to talk about what we are good at. And if others do not understand the powers and mechanisms of our institutions and do not find the single phone line to call, then this is all fine for us. We also do not have to brag about it. We assume the worst to get reasonable results.

    • @ahmedmoin295
      @ahmedmoin295 6 місяців тому

      How about his theory LI?

  • @davidrenton
    @davidrenton 2 роки тому +1

    Teresa May was a notoriously weak PM. I think he underestimates the feeling behind Brexit, it's all very well saying the US took a sober view, but the US generally have a intense misunderstanding of Europe.3 PM's have lost their Job fundamentally because of Brexit.
    My point about American's not understanding Europe, Brexit had very little to do with Right Wing Radicalism, seeing as most of the supporters where prior Labour Supporters and Jeremy Corbyn a far left socialist was fundamentally in support of it.
    Other areas that come back to bite, the EU in 2017 was apparently going down the energy security from Russia, how did that work.
    On Military deployment's, Europe has 2 countries that did the heavy lifting, the UK and France. the EU has lost it's main military power.

  • @kunstturndiego
    @kunstturndiego 6 років тому +1

    16:00
    Balsam auf die Wunden! KLARTEXT!
    Ebenso zum Thema Euro: Klartext.

  • @FinalfantasyFRANtic
    @FinalfantasyFRANtic 6 років тому

    I like the dissection of Britain's policy on the EU very much. :D

  • @MadnessMotorcycle
    @MadnessMotorcycle 4 роки тому +4

    This man is wrong more often than a typical Harvard man usually is. Go search for his lecture regarding the EU as the next super power from 2014. His ideas do not hold up very long at all.
    On another note, what sort of job would a graduate with a masters degree in EU studies qualify for?