What would YOU do if you made a crazy play like Daniel’s? 🤯 A. Nothing? B. Windmill your hand in your opponent’s face? C. Allow your opponent to pick one card? D. Or something else… ?
It's only a crazy play because it worked. Show the other 99% of the time where she has an A and calls. Negreanu was down 6:1 before the hand, it was a last gasp to stay alive. Funny how she knew he had a 3. Realize, she was 8-high. Fast forward to him in the Bahamas, losing $1M.
Nothing. I don't let my opponent see what I had so they are left in wonder. That will play into the rest of the hands for the rest of the match. AFTER the match is over, I'd disclose that info should they ask :)
The craziest play I ever saw at a poker table happened about fifteen years ago on a tv game. A guy had four fours and he was pushing through the hand, getting good raises and play. Then at the river, his opponent flopped four sevens. It took the guy over five minutes but he folded his four fours. I was in complete shock. I would have gone quickly and completely, clean out. What a brilliant read.
Depends...was the board 44777, 44477 or 447x7? The first one can be easy to fold quads...even the second one, depending on the action, you might land on your opponent having 77 (ie. your opponent is either pretty sure you don't have a four, or doesn't seem to care that you could)...the last one could be an impressive read (or it could be a mistake if opponent will play 7x the same way). I agree it's "crazy"...jury is still out on "brilliant"
@@bajajoepoker - You heard him - the guy flopped them on the river. It's a new thing, just introduced, like when everybody and their high-stakes brother went straddle crazy.
I think addlstein is possibly the best cash game player, however, I also felt like he was playing in generally soft games. Sure, they were high stakes. But it doesn’t change the fact that his opponents played super loose with lots of opportunity to be exploited.
@@lukebfilms4232lol bullshit he’s top5 nlh high stakes live nlh players and it’s not even fucking close Who do you think is going to run over Garret ? 😂😂
The way she uses her hands at the call on the raise from Daniel on the flop was THE MAJOR BOOK OF TELL the fingers pushing away her call. The master thing from Daniel is to follow up on it. LEGEND.
It’s not so much how does he make these reads; I think a lot of players could deduce the situation in a similar fashion to what he did - it’s having the confidence in your read to the degree where you can execute your move so smoothly that it’s very convincing - that’s what sets him apart.
@@marsstubblefield Daniel has documented both. At the end of 2023 he put out a vlog about his losses, and he recently just posted on his podcast with his wife about his $1mil loss in 2024. That's mostly down to variance though (see my response to @kevinmclain4080
I am curious how often the top pros find themselves in situations where they may think GTO Poker says I should do X, but I think I have a good read and instead of doing X, I am going to do Y? And the follow-up is are they “on average” better off ignoring GTO Poker in those situations?
The universe is vast, indifferent, and unchanging in its trajectory, unaffected by our fleeting choices. Whether we succeed or fail, all paths eventually lead to the same inevitable end, their outcomes fading into the obscurity of time. This realization strips decisions of their weight, freeing us from the illusion of purpose tied to a single choice. The simple act of choosing becomes an act of defiance, a way to impose fleeting meaning in an otherwise indifferent cosmos.
GTO is the basis from which you exploit. If you don't know the starting/optimal solution then you may think you're exploiting someone but actually aren't.
About 14 years ago I was in a multiway pot as the big blind with 54 off suit in a cash game. There must have been 6 players or so to the flop. Flop comes out A26, giving me a gutshot. Long story short, the board ended up being unpaired, it got checked to the river and I didn't improve, and a guy in late position bet. I called. He turned over 53 and we chopped with 5 high.
Craziest play I ever saw was having pocket kings and raising $20 at a 1/3 cash game. Flop comes Q-2-8 rainbow. I bet $65, my opponent raises to $150. I go all-in for $330 more and he snap calls. I think he has a set but it’s A-4 offsuit! On a Q-2-8 board! Then the turn brings a 3, River is a 5. He hits the back door runner runner wheel. Everyone at the table is stunned.
Playing Omaha we're all in after the flop. We deal it twice. Villan catches runner runner runner runner clubs to draw out both boards with backdoor flushes.
That’s just a regular Friday night story. You have it, villain thinks you’re full of shit, even though villain has nothing-villain calls you anyway, villain hits some crazy suck out runner -runner, life goes on.
recently, i played with clearly a reg for 3 hours. maybe he got bored, idk he called an all in with 2 6 suited and flopped a straight. no one could believe it. first and only time he did that all session
Can you spend more time breaking down river action? I feel you often end the videos too quickly without analyzing the river even when the most exciting action is on the river
Craziest play I have ever seen will probably never be surpassed (wasn't in the hand). We're at the river in a tournament, board is J high. Guy bets like 2/3 pot and the other guy hero calls with 10 7 high and is right against a missed straight draw.
Just went all in with KK guy flopped 3 queens . Then on my rebuy I had two pair guy rivered a higher two pair, then on my third rebuy my pocket 10s lost to a river ace … what a horrible day for poker
The casino is a favourite on every roulette spin. If the player keeps spinning that wheel, betting money, over time they will lose it all. But sometimes they get lucky. Does the casino ever object about it? Rarely. Be the casino.
That's what I was thinking, and he'll try to cover himself by talking about it. "I don't think I should call this...", then he calls and loses. "See, I TOLD you I shouldn't have called."
Look, Daniel Negreau doesn't do what any top, top pro doesn't do; he just says what he's thinking out loud. And, we always seem to see clips where he's right and looks like a genius (i'm not saying he isn't a brilliant player), and not the many, many times when he's wrong. Consequently, he has this image/reputation for being brilliant for working out opponents' exact hand. Edit: Posted this at the start of the vid; i thought from the thumbnail that it was another of his 'magical' reads of others' hands.
@@chasebethersonton5169 Nice one, you got me. I should watch a vid all the way through before commenting. Daniel is a super player, though. I love the way he conducts himself at a poker table, and his reading/predictions of hands. Thanks for the response. ;)
it's an amazing play... however by the way the announcers were talking, it sounds like Kristen had been getting hit with the deck for a while against Daniel. I think Daniel was fed-up and figured it was a last ditch effort move to try to get back into the game. i think if it were early in heads-up play, and if they both started with 4 million in chips equally - i don't think daniel would have jammed all-in on the river. i think the situation dictated his play.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but folding doesn't add up: She has to believe he doesn't have a K or 9 (just like he to her) right? That leaves the 3 (which he had). But with the 3, she knows there's a decent chance her 8 is in play (via counterfeited board). So she would have to believe he's got: 10 | J | A and that's it. Her 8 should be good much of the time with this board. I think it was a bad fold, like she wasn't reading the deck. Insight? I'm ok being completely ignorant :)
I wanna see if this hand lives up to the hoopla of the video title. So far the check raise with 3-2 on a 9-9-3 board is pretty standard. Put your opponent to the rest to see if they have a big pair or not. Now if she did Foxen would probably come big over the top. Let's see what happens next. Part Two: Very weird to check call after check raising the flop. I would continue to show strength & lead any turn but he also knows Foxen can be pretty aggressive so he expects her to bet when he checks on the turn. Although this doesn't really tell him where's at. Foxen could have easily floated the flop with two big cards & some sort of backdoor draw. She could have a king in this situation. Ok the river play by Negreanu was pretty good.
Craziest call I ever saw that ended up being right - I don't know if this guy was the biggest calling station in the world, or was able to read into his opponent's soul, but I saw a guy with red 87 bluff at a board that was KQJ9, with four clubs, and dude snap-called him with a pair of red deuces. Sure, he beats the Ace-High bluffs, but loses to a whole mittful of other bluffs. Any single pair bluffs...even AK. QJ can bluff here. Hell, 2c2s or As2c might bluff here. So even if we ignore any value and assume that he KNEW his opponent was bluffing, it's still a crazy call.
I was typing that he should’ve check-raised Jam the turn, and as I was typing he did in on the river 😂 get a little extra value doing it that way, but I feel like it makes less sense.
when it's down to heads-up of a televised "major tournament", they want to make the production look as showy and intense as possible. more chips on the table makes it look more dramatic. it makes it look like they're playing for a LOT of money.. and they are.
It would be even more stuning if she correctly deduced that negreanu might turn some weak 3 into shoves and sigh calls with 8 kicker. That would be epic hand. It was so tiny to call to just see his hand and get info like it was almost 2 milly in there and only like 4 hundo to call and she has huge chiplead and she could say all right whatever you prolly got me but i want to see it lol.
I don't understand why she folded to 400k more instead of calling to win 2.7 mil and the tournament...I feel he was representing the 3 the entire time. The jam felt like he was doing that anyway. Any explanation would be appreciated. Thank you
@@howard5992he only needs to have a 9 or higher to beat her to go with his 3. Why give your opponent an easy 500k? You're telling me that you'd call an all in check raise with 8 high on that board?
@@andrewjack31 She had no reason to bet the river. At showdown it was statistically a coin toss (eight is the middle card in the deck). The better play would have been to go to showdown after Daniel checked. Why bet the river if you are going to fold to a re-raise ? She misplayed the hand there. Daniel had a major chip disadvantage. Half his remaining chips were in the pot. He was "pot committed" . Going to show-down would have hurt him more than it would have hurt her so if he had a weak card (as was the case) he has a very big incentive to bluff. Winning the hand was 50 -50 for her. She was getting four to one to call. I would not want to be in her position but even calling the all-in was reasonable.
That’s what I heard too. I’d have to see more of her play to see if she varies her voice intentionally. Additionally, she may have wanted to appear weak as a double bluff.
The lodge where guy folds trip aces to a straight and Is correct. Like only 34 beats him or 23 or something and he's able to fold the 2nd nuts, and there wasn't even a flush draw available, no way could you put someone on that low straight but he did and was correct, that was the best hand played recently
I know how Daniel does it, he guesses five possibilities then they edit out the ones he gets wrong. Every successful long term winner can guess ranges well, Daniel is notorious for guessing then making crap decisions anyway.
Wrong… based on the way the hand played out he knew she didn’t have a 9 or a K, particularly when he checks back the river and she makes a large bet. If she had any showdown value like A high, she would just check back there.
Not a crazy play. What's the worst that happens if he's wrong? 2nd place? Started w/15 blinds and this is a significant pot to steal She looks weak the whole way... AK and A3 out of range... A7-7x highly unlikely... Kx... unlucky... weak 1/3 pot stab. Down bet to under 1/3 pot in turn... then sets up a bigger polarized bet with fold equity. It's a great line for her to use in the future against him in spots like this too
I think Foxen needs to shove that river. Negreanu has under a million left and you can’t call a check raise jam so you need to put him in the exact spot he put you in where you simply cant call. If you’re wrong, you lost an extra 500K and you’re still the chip leader but if you’re right, he’s left with under 1M.
For 400k more, if i were Foxen, i would of just called that all in... A) so much in there + he could had nothing too and you could be good b) good to gain some information if he was good.
dont believe this was a read.... this was more "theres not much else to do" I think it was exactly what was said at the end of the hand by both players
Wait, heads up, why would someone fold with two pair after The Flop? I don't see that as a brave or unusual place to pay the $80k. He raises, which is why he's DN, I am am some dork watching UA-cam poker hands.
She was getting 6 to 1 (or better?) to call. I feel like, in hindsight, given the stack sizes there is greater than a 17% chance Daniel is making a desperate bluff with air. He convinced her, but if she sat back and thought about it...... i
That didn’t seem like a big deal at all. The action and board run out were perfect for a Bluff catcher. Bet sizes were small the entire way. The only interesting thing was that he went all in for an extra 450 rather than just call her. That part is over my head, but would have thought that only better hands could call him at that point and it wasn’t a risk worth taking, even if his read of Jack high, ace high, etc was accurate
If the opponent would be a thinking player she would have called. This hand, she used her instinct and not her brain which is perfectly fine. But it was a call.
This bluff series heads up at the final table of the 2.5K 2024 WSOP. Completed flush on board in clubs. Neither player with a club, so both are playing the board. Bet, raise, 3-bet, 4-bet, 5-bet jam. Insane. ua-cam.com/video/LYahjsWYW8w/v-deo.html
"How does he do it". Uh, he's the frontman for gambling and poker industry... they MAKE him win. He's good, but if you've seen his streams, you know he's not even that good. They rig tourneys because there is a huge amount of money in the most popular poker player being successful. (I never read replies)
![When GTO Poker Meets EXPLOIT! [Charlie Carrel vs Andy Stacks]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Sym6DP0Q-pU/mqdefault.jpg)
What would YOU do if you made a crazy play like Daniel’s? 🤯
A. Nothing?
B. Windmill your hand in your opponent’s face?
C. Allow your opponent to pick one card?
D. Or something else… ?
It's only a crazy play because it worked. Show the other 99% of the time where she has an A and calls. Negreanu was down 6:1 before the hand, it was a last gasp to stay alive. Funny how she knew he had a 3. Realize, she was 8-high.
Fast forward to him in the Bahamas, losing $1M.
The "literal nut low" in that hand would have been 22!! ;-)
A most likely
A, I want her to wonder what happened and be distracted by it
Nothing. I don't let my opponent see what I had so they are left in wonder. That will play into the rest of the hands for the rest of the match. AFTER the match is over, I'd disclose that info should they ask :)
Everyone: "HE CAN"T KEEP GETTING AWAY WITH THIS"
Dnegs: *Getting away with it for over 30 years ant not stopping any time soon*
That was an excellent HU play. Negreanu worked a lot with ranges. It was perfect play on all streets of the hand. GG!
Though it was a potential bluff, hard to take the chance on that if he had a 10 or higher. Basically had to fold.
The craziest play I ever saw at a poker table happened about fifteen years ago on a tv game. A guy had four fours and he was pushing through the hand, getting good raises and play. Then at the river, his opponent flopped four sevens. It took the guy over five minutes but he folded his four fours. I was in complete shock. I would have gone quickly and completely, clean out. What a brilliant read.
cool story. Did the 4th 7 come on the river? or (2) 7's on the flop?
Depends...was the board 44777, 44477 or 447x7? The first one can be easy to fold quads...even the second one, depending on the action, you might land on your opponent having 77 (ie. your opponent is either pretty sure you don't have a four, or doesn't seem to care that you could)...the last one could be an impressive read (or it could be a mistake if opponent will play 7x the same way). I agree it's "crazy"...jury is still out on "brilliant"
im assuming the flop came 447, turn 7 river 7. would have been a wild hand to watch
@@bajajoepoker - You heard him - the guy flopped them on the river. It's a new thing, just introduced, like when everybody and their high-stakes brother went straddle crazy.
Can you do more vids on garret adelsteins old play? Miss watching him and feel like you could make really helpful vids going over his hands
People like to hate on him but part of what made him so good was his insane tells reading ability.
I think addlstein is possibly the best cash game player, however, I also felt like he was playing in generally soft games. Sure, they were high stakes. But it doesn’t change the fact that his opponents played super loose with lots of opportunity to be exploited.
@@johnnyboychesswell part of being a good cash game player is winning money, therefore finding good games.
@@johnnyboychessgarret is nowhere near the best cash game players
@@lukebfilms4232lol bullshit he’s top5 nlh high stakes live nlh players and it’s not even fucking close
Who do you think is going to run over Garret ? 😂😂
The way she uses her hands at the call on the raise from Daniel on the flop was THE MAJOR BOOK OF TELL the fingers pushing away her call. The master thing from Daniel is to follow up on it. LEGEND.
It’s not so much how does he make these reads; I think a lot of players could deduce the situation in a similar fashion to what he did - it’s having the confidence in your read to the degree where you can execute your move so smoothly that it’s very convincing - that’s what sets him apart.
Dude loses millions playing poker every year. That's what "sets him apart"
@ can you document that❓
@marsstubblefield It's well documented. He lost $2+MM in tournaments in 2023 and $1+MM in 2024. He has all the simps fooled though.
@ so the way you “document“ something is basically to just say it twice
… Good luck with that the next time you find yourself in court
@@marsstubblefield Daniel has documented both. At the end of 2023 he put out a vlog about his losses, and he recently just posted on his podcast with his wife about his $1mil loss in 2024. That's mostly down to variance though (see my response to @kevinmclain4080
I am curious how often the top pros find themselves in situations where they may think GTO Poker says I should do X, but I think I have a good read and instead of doing X, I am going to do Y? And the follow-up is are they “on average” better off ignoring GTO Poker in those situations?
The universe is vast, indifferent, and unchanging in its trajectory, unaffected by our fleeting choices. Whether we succeed or fail, all paths eventually lead to the same inevitable end, their outcomes fading into the obscurity of time. This realization strips decisions of their weight, freeing us from the illusion of purpose tied to a single choice. The simple act of choosing becomes an act of defiance, a way to impose fleeting meaning in an otherwise indifferent cosmos.
GTO is the basis from which you exploit. If you don't know the starting/optimal solution then you may think you're exploiting someone but actually aren't.
About 14 years ago I was in a multiway pot as the big blind with 54 off suit in a cash game. There must have been 6 players or so to the flop. Flop comes out A26, giving me a gutshot. Long story short, the board ended up being unpaired, it got checked to the river and I didn't improve, and a guy in late position bet. I called. He turned over 53 and we chopped with 5 high.
J4 will always be my answer when asked for craziest hand
The Hidden Path to Manifesting Financial Power ebook made me realize so much about attracting wealth, it’s insane
Craziest play I ever saw was having pocket kings and raising $20 at a 1/3 cash game. Flop comes Q-2-8 rainbow. I bet $65, my opponent raises to $150. I go all-in for $330 more and he snap calls. I think he has a set but it’s A-4 offsuit! On a Q-2-8 board! Then the turn brings a 3, River is a 5. He hits the back door runner runner wheel. Everyone at the table is stunned.
Playing Omaha we're all in after the flop. We deal it twice. Villan catches runner runner runner runner clubs to draw out both boards with backdoor flushes.
That’s just a regular Friday night story. You have it, villain thinks you’re full of shit, even though villain has nothing-villain calls you anyway, villain hits some crazy suck out runner -runner, life goes on.
recently, i played with clearly a reg for 3 hours. maybe he got bored, idk he called an all in with 2 6 suited and flopped a straight. no one could believe it. first and only time he did that all session
That's what happens when the dealer is a mechanic.
i'd love to play against that player in a cash game any day of the week.
Can you spend more time breaking down river action? I feel you often end the videos too quickly without analyzing the river even when the most exciting action is on the river
i was waiting for the river explanation and then the video just ends pretty much like wtf lol
Craziest play I have ever seen will probably never be surpassed (wasn't in the hand). We're at the river in a tournament, board is J high. Guy bets like 2/3 pot and the other guy hero calls with 10 7 high and is right against a missed straight draw.
Just went all in with KK guy flopped 3 queens . Then on my rebuy I had two pair guy rivered a higher two pair, then on my third rebuy my pocket 10s lost to a river ace … what a horrible day for poker
The casino is a favourite on every roulette spin. If the player keeps spinning that wheel, betting money, over time they will lose it all. But sometimes they get lucky. Does the casino ever object about it? Rarely. Be the casino.
No one cares
@ you care enough to comment, it’s not meant for sympathy.
I'd like to see a video showing all the time Daniel made a prediction that turned out to be a wrong guess.
That's what I was thinking, and he'll try to cover himself by talking about it. "I don't think I should call this...", then he calls and loses. "See, I TOLD you I shouldn't have called."
Look, Daniel Negreau doesn't do what any top, top pro doesn't do; he just says what he's thinking out loud.
And, we always seem to see clips where he's right and looks like a genius (i'm not saying he isn't a brilliant player), and not the many, many times when he's wrong.
Consequently, he has this image/reputation for being brilliant for working out opponents' exact hand.
Edit: Posted this at the start of the vid; i thought from the thumbnail that it was another of his 'magical' reads of others' hands.
You had a bad read of the video's content.
He loses millions playing poker every year. He has simps fooled though.
@@chasebethersonton5169 Nice one, you got me. I should watch a vid all the way through before commenting.
Daniel is a super player, though. I love the way he conducts himself at a poker table, and his reading/predictions of hands. Thanks for the response. ;)
Not even top top pro, just anybody who plays for a living
Yer that’s class, powerful play👏🏼👏🏼
it's an amazing play... however by the way the announcers were talking, it sounds like Kristen had been getting hit with the deck for a while against Daniel. I think Daniel was fed-up and figured it was a last ditch effort move to try to get back into the game. i think if it were early in heads-up play, and if they both started with 4 million in chips equally - i don't think daniel would have jammed all-in on the river. i think the situation dictated his play.
Crazyeast Play is from a guy from Brazil, he move all in the River represent quads, and made a full house fold.
Did he end up winning it?
Correct me if I'm wrong, but folding doesn't add up: She has to believe he doesn't have a K or 9 (just like he to her) right? That leaves the 3 (which he had). But with the 3, she knows there's a decent chance her 8 is in play (via counterfeited board). So she would have to believe he's got: 10 | J | A and that's it. Her 8 should be good much of the time with this board. I think it was a bad fold, like she wasn't reading the deck. Insight? I'm ok being completely ignorant :)
I wanna see if this hand lives up to the hoopla of the video title. So far the check raise with 3-2 on a 9-9-3 board is pretty standard. Put your opponent to the rest to see if they have a big pair or not. Now if she did Foxen would probably come big over the top. Let's see what happens next. Part Two: Very weird to check call after check raising the flop. I would continue to show strength & lead any turn but he also knows Foxen can be pretty aggressive so he expects her to bet when he checks on the turn. Although this doesn't really tell him where's at. Foxen could have easily floated the flop with two big cards & some sort of backdoor draw. She could have a king in this situation. Ok the river play by Negreanu was pretty good.
Craziest call I ever saw that ended up being right - I don't know if this guy was the biggest calling station in the world, or was able to read into his opponent's soul, but I saw a guy with red 87 bluff at a board that was KQJ9, with four clubs, and dude snap-called him with a pair of red deuces. Sure, he beats the Ace-High bluffs, but loses to a whole mittful of other bluffs. Any single pair bluffs...even AK. QJ can bluff here. Hell, 2c2s or As2c might bluff here. So even if we ignore any value and assume that he KNEW his opponent was bluffing, it's still a crazy call.
The video would be so much better if the guy in the top corner would shut up
Haha, the Jack high reference
They talk about how it's unfortunate they lost table audio, but they talk over the players to do it.
I was typing that he should’ve check-raised Jam the turn, and as I was typing he did in on the river 😂 get a little extra value doing it that way, but I feel like it makes less sense.
Recent WPT Championships at the Wynn. Scott Stewart heads up on the JJJ99 board!!!
A2 or 34 is the nut lo. Negreanu has to play it as though he has the goods, and play it well - hoping Foxen has air, which she does.
Can someone color Kristen up? 😆
when it's down to heads-up of a televised "major tournament", they want to make the production look as showy and intense as possible. more chips on the table makes it look more dramatic. it makes it look like they're playing for a LOT of money.. and they are.
It would be even more stuning if she correctly deduced that negreanu might turn some weak 3 into shoves and sigh calls with 8 kicker. That would be epic hand. It was so tiny to call to just see his hand and get info like it was almost 2 milly in there and only like 4 hundo to call and she has huge chiplead and she could say all right whatever you prolly got me but i want to see it lol.
I don't understand why she folded to 400k more instead of calling to win 2.7 mil and the tournament...I feel he was representing the 3 the entire time. The jam felt like he was doing that anyway. Any explanation would be appreciated. Thank you
She played the river badly.
@@howard5992he only needs to have a 9 or higher to beat her to go with his 3. Why give your opponent an easy 500k? You're telling me that you'd call an all in check raise with 8 high on that board?
@@andrewjack31 She had no reason to bet the river. At showdown it was statistically a coin toss (eight is the middle card in the deck). The better play would have been to go to showdown after Daniel checked.
Why bet the river if you are going to fold to a re-raise ? She misplayed the hand there.
Daniel had a major chip disadvantage. Half his remaining chips were in the pot. He was "pot committed" . Going to show-down would have hurt him more than it would have hurt her so if he had a weak card (as was the case) he has a very big incentive to bluff.
Winning the hand was 50 -50 for her. She was getting four to one to call. I would not want to be in her position but even calling the all-in was reasonable.
Daniel is the greatest over 30 years in the biznes :D
it wasnt even a min raise at the end, isint that just an auto call?
The nut low is A-2, but it doesn't matter, It's an incredible hand by Kid Poker.
She actually beats some 3x lol. Wouldve loved a "I think I win sometimes" into a check back tbh 😅
His reputation alone makes him difficult to beat
Why does she not check
Daniel Negreanu is the most courageous and mentally strong player.
I swear his hair plugs have mind reading powers 😂
Just kidding…
She announced her bet almost in the form of a question. Easy to sniff out.
That’s what I heard too. I’d have to see more of her play to see if she varies her voice intentionally. Additionally, she may have wanted to appear weak as a double bluff.
Slight quiver in her voice too.
@@lotsoffun4939 She's a reg at these stakes its pretty unlikely she would have such a basic voice tell lol
Daniel owned her in this hand. Wp
Tom durr has some insane bluffs
The lodge where guy folds trip aces to a straight and Is correct. Like only 34 beats him or 23 or something and he's able to fold the 2nd nuts, and there wasn't even a flush draw available, no way could you put someone on that low straight but he did and was correct, that was the best hand played recently
Craziest Negreanu play? How about him getting drunk in the Bahamas while punting $1M? How does he do it? Didn't he lose $1M last year?
Yes. And lost $2MM the year before. Impressive.
He won with the worse hand,I’m impressed
I know how Daniel does it, he guesses five possibilities then they edit out the ones he gets wrong. Every successful long term winner can guess ranges well, Daniel is notorious for guessing then making crap decisions anyway.
That's the issue for me. He "correctly" guesses his opponent has 98s, calls and loses. Then there's the edits you mentioned.
This actually was a tilt punt that worked out.
Wrong… based on the way the hand played out he knew she didn’t have a 9 or a K, particularly when he checks back the river and she makes a large bet. If she had any showdown value like A high, she would just check back there.
Because Negreanu has "blockers." He "blocks" 3s full house. He also "blocks". K3, K2, 93 and 92.
That was legit sickness!!!!
Not a crazy play. What's the worst that happens if he's wrong? 2nd place? Started w/15 blinds and this is a significant pot to steal
She looks weak the whole way... AK and A3 out of range... A7-7x highly unlikely... Kx... unlucky... weak 1/3 pot stab. Down bet to under 1/3 pot in turn... then sets up a bigger polarized bet with fold equity. It's a great line for her to use in the future against him in spots like this too
If she didn’t insta fold, I bet she woulda noticed the bet size and mighta talked herself into a call
I think Foxen needs to shove that river. Negreanu has under a million left and you can’t call a check raise jam so you need to put him in the exact spot he put you in where you simply cant call. If you’re wrong, you lost an extra 500K and you’re still the chip leader but if you’re right, he’s left with under 1M.
For 400k more, if i were Foxen, i would of just called that all in... A) so much in there + he could had nothing too and you could be good b) good to gain some information if he was good.
dont believe this was a read.... this was more "theres not much else to do" I think it was exactly what was said at the end of the hand by both players
I want to see a heads-up match between Negreanu and Olga Iermolcheva. She'd have that little bone twitching.
You mean 6 month ago
HE GUESSES EVERY HAND SO CLEARLY HE GONNA GET SOME RIGHT FFS
Wowsers😮
I woulda called off the other 400k in disgust after putting 550k and ended up winning lol
It's easier when you don't care about the money. Like when you are playing with someone else's.
That should have been a call
I recently 4 bet bluffed with pocket 9s after an open, call, and 3bet. From the big blind at a 1-3 game. Got it thru!
Nitty?
Wait, heads up, why would someone fold with two pair after The Flop? I don't see that as a brave or unusual place to pay the $80k. He raises, which is why he's DN, I am am some dork watching UA-cam poker hands.
Every pro can hand read. Usually by the river we'll know opponents holding down to a few possible combos. But Negraneau just vocalizes it all the time
She was getting 6 to 1 (or better?) to call. I feel like, in hindsight, given the stack sizes there is greater than a 17% chance Daniel is making a desperate bluff with air. He convinced her, but if she sat back and thought about it...... i
She also would have won the tournament with that call
When you get beat by like half of his bluffs that isn’t a call at all
What's going on why you showing the flop twice, and you speak too much
He had the winning hand, but he didn't know that, so he was bluffing. Either way he would have won
That didn’t seem like a big deal at all. The action and board run out were perfect for a Bluff catcher. Bet sizes were small the entire way.
The only interesting thing was that he went all in for an extra 450 rather than just call her. That part is over my head, but would have thought that only better hands could call him at that point and it wasn’t a risk worth taking, even if his read of Jack high, ace high, etc was accurate
wdym call her? He would have lost on showdown
he has the worst possible hand, only way to win is by bluffing
I’m an idiot, completely misread the hand!
She should have gone all in
They both literally have A2C as their prelop range. There was no action at all.
The hands you pick are great but you talk to damn long
He plays 24/7 and calls out hands 24/7. Eventually, everyone is correct. Not impressed.
Stop trying to be a Comedian. No reason to Talk about Something that Has Already Happened
If the opponent would be a thinking player she would have called. This hand, she used her instinct and not her brain which is perfectly fine. But it was a call.
We can see what’s going on just show the hand and drop the dumb commentary bro
We saw it. Stop repeating everything a hole
First time I ever saw the literal "net low" win a pot. D- Negs!!!
you mean "nut low"?
Nothing
Jonathon, you're nausiating...That voice... Lose it...
Power play but far away from being an insane read
Eh.
You talk to much.
Please be quiet
Bicknell just donking around as usual. If it wasnt for luck she would never win.
Not that insane when you're playing somebody that bluffs a lot
Daniel has been playing better since getting rid of tds lol
This bluff series heads up at the final table of the 2.5K 2024 WSOP. Completed flush on board in clubs. Neither player with a club, so both are playing the board.
Bet, raise, 3-bet, 4-bet, 5-bet jam. Insane.
ua-cam.com/video/LYahjsWYW8w/v-deo.html
"How does he do it". Uh, he's the frontman for gambling and poker industry... they MAKE him win. He's good, but if you've seen his streams, you know he's not even that good. They rig tourneys because there is a huge amount of money in the most popular poker player being successful. (I never read replies)
You re a fool
They dont rig the tournies 🙄 Everyone thinks everything is a conspiracy nowadays