I tested this 3 times on a double deck game with a 20 unit buy in. The first 2 games I pressed my way to bust before the cut card, the third I doubled in 3 shoes. It's just like any system, it works till it doesn't. If the table is cold you can't win.
So I think with dalembert you need to have a large starting bankroll. I use this system- ans when I win a double down or win a split- instead of reducing my bet by 1 unit- I reduce my bet by half since I won more than I should on that hand. I am on an 18 consecutive win streak at the moment. The key is bankroll- with 20 units- very hard to win- I buy in with 200 units so I have the ammunition
you should always reset when your bankroll hits a net gain. So if you start with 300 and your bet is still at 60 and you hit and your bankroll gains a net gain at 310 you should reset to your base bet of 10.
@@deathelite99not necessarily, it meanly is protecting you to lose everything and excepting that you’re betting session is still in profit after you win or break even because of one win and you don’t get into a rabbit hole of bigger bets and busting you’re intire bankroll, people I wish I learned this the easy way by reading a comment and not by getting slapped in the face at a casino 😂
Great video as always gents! Note to the editors, I’m assuming you’re using Adobe creative cloud to edit. Once you’re done editing, export out your final MP4 file, then run it through Adobe Audition, select all the audio and go to effect -> dynamics processing, and just select the broadcast limiter. Render the effect, then boost all the gain to make it louder. Then marry this new final audio file to your video and rewrap it using media encoder. Sometimes Alex is soft and I can’t hear him. I do have bad hearing due to an encounter with a right wing protestor with a megaphone, but that’s another story. I can always hear Timmy but sometimes I can’t hear Alex. Sorry to nitpick! You guys rock and I love your videos. Just a wanted to give you guys a quick best practice, as you give us such great gaming best practices! Thanks again!
As long as you keep betting 1-4 units the system is fine, but it gets too risky when you reach 6-7 and suicidal if you move to 10 units and more. I use to stop when losing about 30 units on a row, because you can really recover that loss in half an hour or so. D'Alembert system is more conservative than Martingale, most of the time your ROI moves between 5-10% if you keep your bets below 6 units.
Gandalf is correct. If you never take insurance, you’ll be better off than if you always take it. There are more cards in the deck that aren’t 10 than are. In fact, there’s almost twice as many non 10 value than 10 value.
Hi😃 how many bets have you (or anybody) tried loosing i one stroke? I am playing the martingale system, and i has done it for a long time now, the longest loosing strike i have tried was 10 lost bets. I really want to know if anybody tried loosing more then 10 lost bets. Offcourse yousing perfect basic Blackjack stragegy. Hope for some answers🙏🏻😜💰
No... they did it right...... you have to look at it as if BOTH hands had AA and both hands split. with the dealer getting 21 they each lost one and they each pushed on the 21. So they each lose one bet (the lefts)
This system will work 90 % of the time. You just need to walk away when loosing 6 or 7 hands in a row. Tomorrow is another day. I like this better than my system. Much faster at making money!
@@education654321 A lot of who? I follow the math, so I follow basic strategy. 50-50 is a lot better than 45/55 in that sense. Card counting is an entirely different subject matter that most don't bother doing, but should do if they plan to play long term.
@@jonathanlee4324 well if you on a table with a lot of people and you hit the bust card get ready to get yelled at if you hit that card lol. I usually hit a card like that when the table doesn’t have many people on it but no harm no foul if you do.
I agree that you shouldn't hit on a hard 12 with a 3 showing, but basic strategy I believe does say you're supposed to hit. But again, I don't agree and I wouldn't potentially bust over a 3 showing.
set a limit from 5 to 24 up $1 a time total $290 only start at the 24 if you win keep going down if you lose a bet go to $5 and work your way up. If you lose the $24 bet consider it a debt. Ever time you make more then $5 from a blackjack pocket the $5 and the rest to your debt. if your at a min bet and no debt but you are up $150 over all consider a bet about 30% of your bank roll to a max of $80 or $90 but never more then 30% of of your profit. It all about risk management. if you make that lower your next bet by 2$ and keep going if you lose consider your loss a debt and go back to your min bet. there are a few times i have been up over $300 to $500 in 20 minutes or less doing this small change. it will not happen often. But i run for the door after. I never give it back...
Since you will always lose more hands than you win,you will always lose using this de lambert bet strategy.You’ll eventually reach table max and then you’re screwed…
I wasn’t gonna comment on a 2 year old video, but it will be the 69th comment so I will I feel like this system wants to start at 2 or 3 units and regress to get ahead of future losses. Starting at 1 unit there is nowhere to regress to and you end up wanting to lose to get to a place where your doubles and splits get you out pacing the flat bet. Meanwhile a losing shoe loses even faster Im not a fan of chasing systems for that reason, whereas a progressive system can't beat a losing shoe, it capitalizes much more on a winning one
To see how this betting system (right) compares to betting a flat rate (left). This can only be compared if they're dealt the same hands so the hand is considered the same for both spots
Guys, systems like this (where you vary your bet based on whether you win or lose) can't work. The only thing that should lead you to adjust your bet is the favorable or non-favorable conditions of *the undealt cards*. Nothing else makes any sense, and if it seems to, it's confusion / smoke-and-mirrors.
When you split the aces and you got a blackjack on one of them and the dealer got 21, shouldn't it had been a pushed? Why did he took that 30 dollars in chips?🤔
Yeah you're right. I just watched it again. It's at 5:40 and he got a blackjack using the system and the flat bet lost. But I think he took one of each because he was playing both hands so technically both hands had split aces I think..I don't know. Lol. Hopefully they can respond so we can figure out what the hell happened
I dont get why everyone's confused about that. When you split you now have 2 hands. Say you bet 10 dollars then split you put another 10 in and have 2 hands for 10 dollars each. One hand got 21, the other got 17 and the dealer got 21. So he lost the 17 hand, so bye to that 10 dollars, and his other hand since its same as dealer, its a push, so he gets 10 from that hand. Win 10, bet 20, that's why they took half the chips. Splitting aces doesn't count as blackjack so its a push. If dealer would have pulled a 20 instead of 21 then it would have been a push overall because the first 10 would win getting 20 and the second hand would lose so no chips would be taken in that case Sorry if im explaining something super obvious and not understanding what you guys are confused about cuz I don't get why everyone's confused about that
This is the first game that beat my fibinacci system. This system rewards win one lose one where mine breaks even and most fail. But I'd like to compare it on a losing deck
I tested this 3 times on a double deck game with a 20 unit buy in. The first 2 games I pressed my way to bust before the cut card, the third I doubled in 3 shoes. It's just like any system, it works till it doesn't. If the table is cold you can't win.
So I think with dalembert you need to have a large starting bankroll. I use this system- ans when I win a double down or win a split- instead of reducing my bet by 1 unit- I reduce my bet by half since I won more than I should on that hand. I am on an 18 consecutive win streak at the moment. The key is bankroll- with 20 units- very hard to win- I buy in with 200 units so I have the ammunition
Como todo sistema você tem que ter um limite se não você quebra
you should always reset when your bankroll hits a net gain. So if you start with 300 and your bet is still at 60 and you hit and your bankroll gains a net gain at 310 you should reset to your base bet of 10.
isnt this just martingale
@@deathelite99not necessarily, it meanly is protecting you to lose everything and excepting that you’re betting session is still in profit after you win or break even because of one win and you don’t get into a rabbit hole of bigger bets and busting you’re intire bankroll, people I wish I learned this the easy way by reading a comment and not by getting slapped in the face at a casino 😂
the best show on youtube ,,,, you earned a subscriber
Great video as always gents! Note to the editors, I’m assuming you’re using Adobe creative cloud to edit. Once you’re done editing, export out your final MP4 file, then run it through Adobe Audition, select all the audio and go to effect -> dynamics processing, and just select the broadcast limiter. Render the effect, then boost all the gain to make it louder. Then marry this new final audio file to your video and rewrap it using media encoder. Sometimes Alex is soft and I can’t hear him. I do have bad hearing due to an encounter with a right wing protestor with a megaphone, but that’s another story. I can always hear Timmy but sometimes I can’t hear Alex. Sorry to nitpick! You guys rock and I love your videos. Just a wanted to give you guys a quick best practice, as you give us such great gaming best practices! Thanks again!
on 8:10 Alex take the System money to play for the Flat guy LOL
Now THAT is an amazing system!
As long as you keep betting 1-4 units the system is fine, but it gets too risky when you reach 6-7 and suicidal if you move to 10 units and more.
I use to stop when losing about 30 units on a row, because you can really recover that loss in half an hour or so.
D'Alembert system is more conservative than Martingale, most of the time your ROI moves between 5-10% if you keep your bets below 6 units.
Insurance is a sucker bet. Unless your playing Timmy. Can we take insurance on any hand?
you can take insurance if the dealer get Ace show up, and if you have BJ you can take even money also.
@@methasphuthong4108 I meant that as. Timmy has a 6 showing. Can I take insurance. I know he will get a 21. lol
@@gandalf84 lol
Gandalf is correct. If you never take insurance, you’ll be better off than if you always take it. There are more cards in the deck that aren’t 10 than are. In fact, there’s almost twice as many non 10 value than 10 value.
If count is a true 3 or higher you'll be better off in long run taking even money or insurance if your not a counter then yes you should never take it
I like the flat and system 😮
Just had a little go at this, £1 units…made £20….not bad, will be toying with this and the 212 system (using basic strategy)
Thanks for teaching this system. Just got home from the casino. I won $525 in 4 hours playing single deck.
Hi😃 how many bets have you (or anybody) tried loosing i one stroke? I am playing the martingale system, and i has done it for a long time now, the longest loosing strike i have tried was 10 lost bets. I really want to know if anybody tried loosing more then 10 lost bets. Offcourse yousing perfect basic Blackjack stragegy.
Hope for some answers🙏🏻😜💰
Not sure about the loosing streak.. but i had a 19 hand win streak recently.. if i could win 19 times, I'd assume i could lose 19 times too..
20 times
When you split those aces, you played them as though one ace belonged to each bet instead of both aces belonging to both bets
Same with those 8s
No... they did it right...... you have to look at it as if BOTH hands had AA and both hands split. with the dealer getting 21 they each lost one and they each pushed on the 21. So they each lose one bet (the lefts)
Nice. I'd get +120 by my system. Waiting for your review. TIA.
This system will work 90 % of the time. You just need to walk away when loosing 6 or 7 hands in a row. Tomorrow is another day. I like this better than my system. Much faster at making money!
Love u guy videos, can you try the stern betting system thanks.
Actually, the hit on 12 with a Dealer 3 is correct! Nice Basic Strategy! 😁
Not really.
Its is correct... its not about winning 1 hand, its about winning the session
@@jonathanlee4324 it’s really not unless you know the count. But if you don’t then it’s 50 - 50. Because a lot you stay on that
@@education654321 A lot of who? I follow the math, so I follow basic strategy. 50-50 is a lot better than 45/55 in that sense. Card counting is an entirely different subject matter that most don't bother doing, but should do if they plan to play long term.
@@jonathanlee4324 well if you on a table with a lot of people and you hit the bust card get ready to get yelled at if you hit that card lol. I usually hit a card like that when the table doesn’t have many people on it but no harm no foul if you do.
I agree that you shouldn't hit on a hard 12 with a 3 showing, but basic strategy I believe does say you're supposed to hit. But again, I don't agree and I wouldn't potentially bust over a 3 showing.
set a limit from 5 to 24 up $1 a time total $290 only start at the 24 if you win keep going down if you lose a bet go to $5 and work your way up. If you lose the $24 bet consider it a debt. Ever time you make more then $5 from a blackjack pocket the $5 and the rest to your debt. if your at a min bet and no debt but you are up $150 over all consider a bet about 30% of your bank roll to a max of $80 or $90 but never more then 30% of of your profit. It all about risk management. if you make that lower your next bet by 2$ and keep going if you lose consider your loss a debt and go back to your min bet. there are a few times i have been up over $300 to $500 in 20 minutes or less doing this small change. it will not happen often. But i run for the door after. I never give it back...
It's kind of similar to how I do it. I start with $50 and then if I win I go to $25 bets usually for a little bit.
Since you will always lose more hands than you win,you will always lose using this de lambert bet strategy.You’ll eventually reach table max and then you’re screwed…
Looks like AndyC got here first skittle lol
well played!!
You guys rock!
This system will work with slightly equal amount of losing streak vs winning streak.
What is the discord channel???
Get him Alex!
min 8.15 you use chips from diferent stacks.
I wasn’t gonna comment on a 2 year old video, but it will be the 69th comment so I will
I feel like this system wants to start at 2 or 3 units and regress to get ahead of future losses. Starting at 1 unit there is nowhere to regress to and you end up wanting to lose to get to a place where your doubles and splits get you out pacing the flat bet. Meanwhile a losing shoe loses even faster
Im not a fan of chasing systems for that reason, whereas a progressive system can't beat a losing shoe, it capitalizes much more on a winning one
11:33 lol ya gotta push it in more .... that stack looks so wrong on so many levels ... just really look at it , what does it remind you of ...lolz
And you forgot if wants to take even odds on that blackjack one
Just lost $80 in 4 hands straight with a $15 minimum bet last night
But can we get slippery Timmy's Onlyfans link? For research
Why is he dealing one player hand and paying both spots on a win?
To see how this betting system (right) compares to betting a flat rate (left). This can only be compared if they're dealt the same hands so the hand is considered the same for both spots
The best system is basic strategy, statistically any other strategy just changes the variance of your bankroll.
Basic strategy isn't a system... he's using basic strategy for his decisions while applying this particular betting system
The strategy to play is: 1 - 2 - 10....
Guys, systems like this (where you vary your bet based on whether you win or lose) can't work. The only thing that should lead you to adjust your bet is the favorable or non-favorable conditions of *the undealt cards*. Nothing else makes any sense, and if it seems to, it's confusion / smoke-and-mirrors.
没看到加倍啊
Sure…Timmy like to cheat Alex.
So martingale system basically?
❤
When you split the aces and you got a blackjack on one of them and the dealer got 21, shouldn't it had been a pushed? Why did he took that 30 dollars in chips?🤔
The flat hand lost that's why. Remember he's playing 2 different hands.. The flat bet and the system dalambert
Yeah you're right. I just watched it again. It's at 5:40 and he got a blackjack using the system and the flat bet lost. But I think he took one of each because he was playing both hands so technically both hands had split aces I think..I don't know. Lol.
Hopefully they can respond so we can figure out what the hell happened
@@kwanholloway4112 lol. Yea that move kinda confused me. We want an explanation.
I dont get why everyone's confused about that. When you split you now have 2 hands. Say you bet 10 dollars then split you put another 10 in and have 2 hands for 10 dollars each. One hand got 21, the other got 17 and the dealer got 21. So he lost the 17 hand, so bye to that 10 dollars, and his other hand since its same as dealer, its a push, so he gets 10 from that hand. Win 10, bet 20, that's why they took half the chips. Splitting aces doesn't count as blackjack so its a push. If dealer would have pulled a 20 instead of 21 then it would have been a push overall because the first 10 would win getting 20 and the second hand would lose so no chips would be taken in that case
Sorry if im explaining something super obvious and not understanding what you guys are confused about cuz I don't get why everyone's confused about that
This is the first game that beat my fibinacci system. This system rewards win one lose one where mine breaks even and most fail.
But I'd like to compare it on a losing deck
On a blackjack, he took your money…the half bet?????
Cool..
👌👌👌👍👍👍👍👍
You didn't explain this enough. I'm not following.
Im bored in house watching this and longmire on netflix, like if bored, or got new ps5 , xbox series x
Come on. Second hand already wasn’t basic strategy… 10 on a 2