I like that you guys aren't trying to be a comedy show or a stunt show. I watch those car shows too, I love em all, but sometimes I just want to drink my morning coffee and watch a show with a calmer cadence, like yours--great review!
Just purchased a Jaguar F-Pace S for my wife, and have to say we love it! It stands out in the world of boring SUVs and is actually fun to drive; never thought I'd be able to say that about our family vehicle! I drive a Porsche 991.2 CS, and am happy to have the Jag in the garage along with it. The size is much more practical than the Macan, and I think it drives better than all the Macan variants. Two thumbs up for the F-Pace!
Why? this isn't the Jaguar F pace R, it's the basic 3.5T. why would you want to compare it to Audi's performance division? Both are suited and in direct competition.
No. The F pace 3.5t is the direct competitor to the Q5 It's not Jag's fault that their vehicle is leaps and bounds better The F pace S would be direct competitor to the SQ5 And even then the Audi doesn't match up
Always good to see Carlos working hard for my automotive consumer enlightenment. Hopefully he'll get back to making his famous "O" face soon. Btw, Audis new gauge cluster interface is nice. And kudos to Ford for do something similar in the GT and coming Mustang.
Great review. I feel like with the F-Pace, a deal breaker is the price. If one wants a car with things standard for luxury SUV (keyless entry, blind spot monitor, good screen, etc.), the price quickly climbs up to 60s.
I kind of disagree with you saying that the Jaguar F-Pace is bland. It's your personal feeling and I respect it but for an individual who buys a jaguar they are not buying one for its design risks. People buy a jaguar for its classy and distinctive look. Everything within the vehicle has a purpose and it is all integrated very nicely. While the materials may not be as good as the mercedes I feel this car has more of a purpose to its design. What i mean by purpose is that it is more functional. Overall, this was very informative and well thoughout review.
Love the comparison focused on the actual cars and not the production drama, both hosts give knowledgeable insight of both cars, while the cars remain the star of the video.And yes, the F-Pace is turning heads away from the boredom of X5s, RRs, and Audis
Nice job boys .... enjoyed the review & info. Totally agree that Q5 Nav screen looks "stuck on dash as afterthought"...interesting that all future models Audi marketing materials show an integrated Nav screen. I think a lot of people may be concerned about JAG mechanical reliability based on some past history with this brand ....your thoughts on that. Keep up the nice work ...I just subscribed and look forward to future videos. Full disclosure , I own the Q5 TDI ..... man I love this car, nothing bad to say. A true comfortable road trip monster ! cheers, BW
Good one, very informative. As part of future comparisons, I would be interested in hearing what your projected, lets say 5 year, "resale value" value would be. The lack of categorical scoring in favor of an abundance of the reviewers impression of the vehicle really makes for one tasty review. Well hopefully not just one, I'll keep watching and Thank you.
I thought the F-Pace was the best looking and most different SUV out right now until my neighbor popped up with a Maserati Levante, that thing in black looks amazing and so different.
I don't know what's so exceptional about that Audi interior, it has plastics everywhere. May be you prefer the interior design to the f pace which kind of has a plain dashboard layout, but in terms of quality materials used i'll say they are about on par. But the Jag is by far the better looking car exterior and has a better rear interior design and finish. Then of course the Jaguar is by far the better performance and handling vehicle, it's no brainer for me though, i'll rather have the F pace all day all year.
Wow great video, I can't help myself but comparing it to Head2Head and Ignition on Motor Trend and I have to say I like this just as much maybe this doesn't have music and shots from outside but it feels more natural, it's too much acting now on Motor Trend
I bought an audi q5 four days ago and today sold it and bought an f-pace. Why i did it? Cause q5 has spme desing failures that no one talk about them. First cupholders are awkward and misplaced as well as cd driver. it's really nosense.i cannot drink anything inside the car. this is so important to me cause i'm driving from switzerland to italy and vice versa. During long way i need to drink something. Secondly, same manner windows buttons are behind my arm. I guess that q5 designed for short armed person.Thirdly the metal base around gearbox is reflecting sunlight directly into my eyes. It's really dangerous and i cannot believe that. no one does not notice that. Fourthly, contrary to comments on infotainment system it is not easy to use. For example to find somewhere for navi you must use touchpad however if you are still driving it's not possible to write something cause the touchpad is not responsive. You should focus on touchpad instead of your way. And due to touchpad placement gearbox and cupholders are misplaced, so behind the hands. And this new screen is not in conformity with whole design. it is really strange. The menus are so complicated and you have to do more than one movement to reach your desired menu or function and further to that you have to use different tools to do that. For example to select driving mode you think that you can use the buttons however you can use just up and down function and you must tap on the main button on the base to choose the driving mode It is really stupid. And finally the two screen concept are so confused. At the same time two different navi screen appears. But in any case you have to just focus on the road for a safe driving and the design must be so simple and smart. But no one talk about such design failures. it is incredible to ignore all of those.there are also a lot of things to be told. at the end of the day i choose fpace even i lost money because of this rapid shifting.but at least i'm now happy. Fpace provides me simplicity and i can drink something with great comfort and windows buttons are easy reached placed. The comfort for me just those not shapes,not coloured lightnings.the cockpit is my living area and must be simple and smartly designed.q5 failed.note: i was very happy with my 2016 q5. Above all i have a maserati ghibli and i adore it. It's a different thing :)
Deepak Agrawal i drive it from italy to turkey time to time. It's little bit small for me however it's so comfortable and consuming is not so much because my ghibli is a diesel. So i can say that yes it's reliable..
"Turbo" and "no lag" should not appear in the same sentence....modern turbo engines still have noticeable lag (soft throttle response, slow off the line, lumpiness in power delivery). A reviewer that states otherwise is not really qualified...
I really enjoy your reviews, it's nice to see an American perspective on euro cars. However I question the need of two hosts if your both going to agree on everything. I'd like to see some conflict or just one guy talking to the camera.
Living in Reno NV I've been seeing lots of F-Paces...Nice change from all the BMW and Mercs and Audis, even though my 2012 Optima EX premium got thru our last epic winter just great on M/S tires. Still think the SUV craze is a bit over the top!
shopwithaaron Same here throughout the Midwest. I'm sure the Jags resale value will fall off a cliff, but they are visually nice in person. And are a change of pace to all the small "murdered out" Range Rovers that flood my area of town.
shopwithaaron my 20 year old Volvo 850 with front wheel drive and a 5 speed manual got me through the tough winter here in Reno as well....it's my daily driver...
"...Still think the SUV craze is a bit over the top!" Really? Performance in a vehicle that's actually practical, and can haul 5 people with room for luggage... and that's over the top? how about a $500,000 lambo that can't be driven on most roads due to low ground clearance, and loses half it's value after signing... now that's over the top.
That Virtual cockpit must be broken. While you are driving & looking at/talking about it the camera pans to the dash & it reads 0 mph. Nice video editing ;)
I have the 2016 Q5 and today I got the 2018 Q5 as a loaner car and I do not like the car at all. Seating is not as high up (almost feels like a sedan), I like to drive with left hand rested on door panel and on 2018 its just not in the right position to rest my elbow. Just don't like Audi transmission - lag, jitteriness messes up your driving experience.
I'd like to see how the all new 2018 Volvo XC60 compares in this category. I like both of these vehicles, however I think Jaguar lacks the technology that Audi and Volvo are known for. Jaguar-Land Rover apparently hasn't received the industry memo that 4G LTE connectivity and Android Auto and Apple Carplay are more than passing fads for luxury car buyers.
I agree. The Volvo won't be as sporty as the Jag, but no one tops their interiors, and I really like how they've modified the body in 2018. Price will be competitive as well.
There's a 9-10k difference in price point when I did a comparable build for each of these. I'm not sure the Jag is worth that much more. Meh, who am I kidding, the Allroad is much cooler and you won't see everybody else driving by with the same car.
Why would you compare a 6 cylinder vehicle with a 4 cylinder vehicle and then complain that one model is not as powerful as the other? Both vehicles have 4 cylinder and 6 cylinder variants.
BassRacerx the logic holds true if we were to forgo their digital publications. I can't see how edmunds UA-cam channel can be more relative than motor trend's with the current disparity of subscription count between the two.
The jag is nice, but the Audi is a good bit cheaper. Especially when looking at leases, as the Audi has a higher residual. Even long term Audi has much better reliability ratings. That jag is nice looking though.
Buying an SUV for performance is a little like buying a coat for the summer, not sure I would I would have much use for that feature, certainly my wife would not.
Deal breaker for me with Audi / VAG in particular is the lack of an opaque moon-roof cover. Gives me headaches , maybe it's just being here in California i d k but can't stand that
John McPeck the infiniti qx50 has proper blind for the sunroof. I tested both these and ended up buying the qx50. Better value. And great fun to drive.
J O'Neill QX50 is total old junk. It's unrefined, looks just awful, and overpriced. I'm glad you got your little word in so you feel better about justifying your purchase. On the other hand, I feel bad for you! Archaic engine, old platform, horrible interior, UNREFINED, loud. Yah, I drove that shit box for 2 months in Japan. It's a NISSAN there BTW. Get a grip on reality - it is NOT a competitor to an Audi Q5. You are totally detached from reality.
Well seeing that I'm crossing the Pacific ocean in Seat 1K on a 747-400 in United First as we speak, I'd say I have no trouble affording them. Feel free to come to my channel and watch my recent Frankfurt-SFO trip in Seat 3K, United First Suite on the 747-400. Like I said, I'm glad you got your word in. I'll be in Seoul for the next 2 weeks working with our crisis management team. What are you going to be doing? Have fun in the Nissan. Fun note: QX50 is the same car the embattled ex-DNC head Debby Washerman Schultz drives. It's the Pontiac Aztec for our generation - sad, frumpy, and for credit laggards who can't afford to finance a $50,000 German product.
Who cares about your personal opinions about any cars , we do not all have the same seeing and feeling in any cars it's all down to personal individual feels
Hey carlos! Dont you miss the excitement of running some.of this cars at the tracm with randy pobst?? This reviews arent aa engaging aa.the ones in motor trend homeboy next to you dont help at all... just saying
I don’t understand..... Why not compare the 3.0 Q5 (not the SQ5) to the Jaguar? I don’t wanna see a 4 cylinder compared to a V6 when the former has a V6 option as well.
You chose 35t over 25t, why don’t you chose Sq5 over Q5? Jaguar has the worst luxury quality. All junk materials, that’s why they always have quality issues.
I watched this video because of Carlos. The other guy sounds like a low information talking head. When you start saying turbo has no lag, you are letting us know that you do not know much about automobiles. I hope Carlos loses the other guy and does these comparison's himself. There is no chemistry between the duo. Period.
Audi has a better build and more luxurious interior. However, the engine is lacking power. To get more HP, you have to get the SQ5 which costs a lot more.
Duh.... There is over a 20,000 dollar difference in what you are comparing. What's next apples and oranges? You could at least compared the F-Pace to the SQ5
The Caucasian guy (Mr. sideburns) says "like" way too much. He sounds like a stupid Kardashian (Hey "sideburns", notice the correct use for "like"). I think the Q5 is the clear winner based on dependability factors between the two brands. Chances are it'll last much longer. Plus, its interior is quite a bit nicer.
audi q5 wins, not even a comparison, transmission tech, safety tech, actually cheaper! (perhaps in usa they re the same), performance, and the audi seats DO recline. jag doesn t even has as much tech as average hatchback lol, any option throws the freaking car to even more insane prices. the lack of ergonomics when you put the window controls on the top of the door, what da heck jag??!!
People do come up and say "Nice Jag" I love it.
Jaguar F-Pace is the one people look admiringly, One of the best SUV'S
I like that you guys aren't trying to be a comedy show or a stunt show. I watch those car shows too, I love em all, but sometimes I just want to drink my morning coffee and watch a show with a calmer cadence, like yours--great review!
Thank you!
Just purchased a Jaguar F-Pace S for my wife, and have to say we love it! It stands out in the world of boring SUVs and is actually fun to drive; never thought I'd be able to say that about our family vehicle! I drive a Porsche 991.2 CS, and am happy to have the Jag in the garage along with it. The size is much more practical than the Macan, and I think it drives better than all the Macan variants.
Two thumbs up for the F-Pace!
PcarFan16
Has it been reliable?
Should be the F-Pace vs. the Audi SQ5
Why? this isn't the Jaguar F pace R, it's the basic 3.5T. why would you want to compare it to Audi's performance division? Both are suited and in direct competition.
Samson Okoro actually, the F Pace and F Pace R have the same engine. An SQ5 would’ve still been a more fair comparison
No.
The F pace 3.5t is the direct competitor to the Q5
It's not Jag's fault that their vehicle is leaps and bounds better
The F pace S would be direct competitor to the SQ5
And even then the Audi doesn't match up
@@NSUScooterno it wouldn't
The F pace S Is the direct competitor to the SQ5
How are people missing this
This review is as natural as it gets . Good job edmunds
Finally a systematic point-by-point comparison test. All should be done with this format.
Now this is how to do a comparative review and not the childish stuff you see on Motor Trend. Great job guys.
One elephant in the room is just how bad the XT5 is compared to these. Really the XC60, F Pace, Q5 just destroy the sad offering from Cadillac.
Always good to see Carlos working hard for my automotive consumer enlightenment.
Hopefully he'll get back to making his famous "O" face soon.
Btw, Audis new gauge cluster interface is nice. And kudos to Ford for do something similar in the GT and coming Mustang.
A+ Wow! Excellent Comprehensive Review.Very Nice!!!! more reviews like this soon! Good Chemistry too!
Great review. I feel like with the F-Pace, a deal breaker is the price. If one wants a car with things standard for luxury SUV (keyless entry, blind spot monitor, good screen, etc.), the price quickly climbs up to 60s.
I kind of disagree with you saying that the Jaguar F-Pace is bland. It's your personal feeling and I respect it but for an individual who buys a jaguar they are not buying one for its design risks. People buy a jaguar for its classy and distinctive look. Everything within the vehicle has a purpose and it is all integrated very nicely. While the materials may not be as good as the mercedes I feel this car has more of a purpose to its design. What i mean by purpose is that it is more functional. Overall, this was very informative and well thoughout review.
Great comparo.
Looking forward to the next (vs) episode.
Love the comparison focused on the actual cars and not the production drama, both hosts give knowledgeable insight of both cars, while the cars remain the star of the video.And yes, the F-Pace is turning heads away from the boredom of X5s, RRs, and Audis
Nice job boys .... enjoyed the review & info. Totally agree that Q5 Nav screen looks "stuck on dash as afterthought"...interesting that all future models Audi marketing materials show an integrated Nav screen. I think a lot of people may be concerned about JAG mechanical reliability based on some past history with this brand ....your thoughts on that. Keep up the nice work ...I just subscribed and look forward to future videos. Full disclosure , I own the Q5 TDI ..... man I love this car, nothing bad to say. A true comfortable road trip monster ! cheers, BW
Good one, very informative. As part of future comparisons, I would be interested in hearing what your projected, lets say 5 year, "resale value" value would be. The lack of categorical scoring in favor of an abundance of the reviewers impression of the vehicle really makes for one tasty review. Well hopefully not just one, I'll keep watching and
Thank you.
I thought the F-Pace was the best looking and most different SUV out right now until my neighbor popped up with a Maserati Levante, that thing in black looks amazing and so different.
5 yr warranty/service on Jag, right?
Yup, 5 yr/60k mi
Carlos Lago it's an awesome warrant
I don't know what's so exceptional about that Audi interior, it has plastics everywhere. May be you prefer the interior design to the f pace which kind of has a plain dashboard layout, but in terms of quality materials used i'll say they are about on par. But the Jag is by far the better looking car exterior and has a better rear interior design and finish. Then of course the Jaguar is by far the better performance and handling vehicle, it's no brainer for me though, i'll rather have the F pace all day all year.
Nice balanced review.
Thanks!
Wow great video, I can't help myself but comparing it to Head2Head and Ignition on Motor Trend and I have to say I like this just as much maybe this doesn't have music and shots from outside but it feels more natural, it's too much acting now on Motor Trend
I bought an audi q5 four days ago and today sold it and bought an f-pace. Why i did it? Cause q5 has spme desing failures that no one talk about them. First cupholders are awkward and misplaced as well as cd driver. it's really nosense.i cannot drink anything inside the car. this is so important to me cause i'm driving from switzerland to italy and vice versa. During long way i need to drink something. Secondly, same manner windows buttons are behind my arm. I guess that q5 designed for short armed person.Thirdly the metal base around gearbox is reflecting sunlight directly into my eyes. It's really dangerous and i cannot believe that. no one does not notice that. Fourthly, contrary to comments on infotainment system it is not easy to use. For example to find somewhere for navi you must use touchpad however if you are still driving it's not possible to write something cause the touchpad is not responsive. You should focus on touchpad instead of your way. And due to touchpad placement gearbox and cupholders are misplaced, so behind the hands. And this new screen is not in conformity with whole design. it is really strange. The menus are so complicated and you have to do more than one movement to reach your desired menu or function and further to that you have to use different tools to do that. For example to select driving mode you think that you can use the buttons however you can use just up and down function and you must tap on the main button on the base to choose the driving mode
It is really stupid. And finally the two screen concept are so confused. At the same time two different navi screen appears. But in any case you have to just focus on the road for a safe driving and the design must be so simple and smart. But no one talk about such design failures. it is incredible to ignore all of those.there are also a lot of things to be told. at the end of the day i choose fpace even i lost money because of this rapid shifting.but at least i'm now happy. Fpace provides me simplicity and i can drink something with great comfort and windows buttons are easy reached placed. The comfort for me just those not shapes,not coloured lightnings.the cockpit is my living area and must be simple and smartly designed.q5 failed.note: i was very happy with my 2016 q5. Above all i have a maserati ghibli and i adore it. It's a different thing :)
ALI OSMAN OZDILEK great observations. Do you think Ghibli is reliable for 1500 mile trips?
Deepak Agrawal i drive it from italy to turkey time to time. It's little bit small for me however it's so comfortable and consuming is not so much because my ghibli is a diesel. So i can say that yes it's reliable..
Great job on the video, these are 2 of the cars that we will be checking out soon along with the glc 300 and the Porsche macan.
"Turbo" and "no lag" should not appear in the same sentence....modern turbo engines still have noticeable lag (soft throttle response, slow off the line, lumpiness in power delivery). A reviewer that states otherwise is not really qualified...
agreed, all Turbos have lag
The F-Pace is to Jaguar what the Infiniti FX35 was to Infiniti in 2003
I really enjoy your reviews, it's nice to see an American perspective on euro cars. However I question the need of two hosts if your both going to agree on everything. I'd like to see some conflict or just one guy talking to the camera.
Living in Reno NV I've been seeing lots of F-Paces...Nice change from all the BMW and Mercs and Audis, even though my 2012 Optima EX premium got thru our last epic winter just great on M/S tires. Still think the SUV craze is a bit over the top!
shopwithaaron Same here throughout the Midwest. I'm sure the Jags resale value will fall off a cliff, but they are visually nice in person. And are a change of pace to all the small "murdered out" Range Rovers that flood my area of town.
shopwithaaron my 20 year old Volvo 850 with front wheel drive and a 5 speed manual got me through the tough winter here in Reno as well....it's my daily driver...
"...Still think the SUV craze is a bit over the top!" Really? Performance in a vehicle that's actually practical, and can haul 5 people with room for luggage... and that's over the top? how about a $500,000 lambo that can't be driven on most roads due to low ground clearance, and loses half it's value after signing... now that's over the top.
Good review, but why try to compare a 6-cylinder with a 4-cylinder as to performance?
Awesome comparison
Auto journalists should strive to be more like Carlos Lago.
Ventilated seats in the q5 are available in the premium with the warm weather package. $1,200 extra. I have one.
That Virtual cockpit must be broken. While you are driving & looking at/talking about it the camera pans to the dash & it reads 0 mph. Nice video editing ;)
I have the 2016 Q5 and today I got the 2018 Q5 as a loaner car and I do not like the car at all. Seating is not as high up (almost feels like a sedan), I like to drive with left hand rested on door panel and on 2018 its just not in the right position to rest my elbow. Just don't like Audi transmission - lag, jitteriness messes up your driving experience.
Jaguar F-Pace for me please!!
I'd like to see how the all new 2018 Volvo XC60 compares in this category. I like both of these vehicles, however I think Jaguar lacks the technology that Audi and Volvo are known for. Jaguar-Land Rover apparently hasn't received the industry memo that 4G LTE connectivity and Android Auto and Apple Carplay are more than passing fads for luxury car buyers.
Ib7 h
Who makes the "Velard"? Must be the French????
I agree. The Volvo won't be as sporty as the Jag, but no one tops their interiors, and I really like how they've modified the body in 2018. Price will be competitive as well.
There's a 9-10k difference in price point when I did a comparable build for each of these. I'm not sure the Jag is worth that much more. Meh, who am I kidding, the Allroad is much cooler and you won't see everybody else driving by with the same car.
Happy belated bday Mr Lago!
Thanks!
nastraightsix iiiiiiiiiii
Carlos is the best!
Carlos, WTF! Why on earth did you leave Motor Trend AGAIN???
Excellent truthful review thanks guys
Why would you compare a 6 cylinder vehicle with a 4 cylinder vehicle and then complain that one model is not as powerful as the other? Both vehicles have 4 cylinder and 6 cylinder variants.
I went with the Q5 PP. Don't forget about dealer network and history of quality. Audi has Jag beat totally.
Lago is back! No, wait...
I think you should compare the sq5 to the 3.5t
Why are people leaving Motor Trend?
its a print publication scrambling to stay relevant in today's digital media.
BassRacerx the logic holds true if we were to forgo their digital publications. I can't see how edmunds UA-cam channel can be more relative than motor trend's with the current disparity of subscription count between the two.
The jag is nice, but the Audi is a good bit cheaper. Especially when looking at leases, as the Audi has a higher residual. Even long term Audi has much better reliability ratings.
That jag is nice looking though.
Q5 design did not progress but it regressed. The front grille, hoodline, and the side crease all look horrible.
Q5 has reclining back seats and sliding rear seats.
Definitely the f pace is the better buy
Buying an SUV for performance is a little like buying a coat for the summer, not sure I would I would have much use for that feature, certainly my wife would not.
Only deal break is the reliability of the Jaguar
They are getting much better and with 5 yr/60k mi warranty, you can't go wrong
How often have you had your F pace in the shop? what where the problems?
Dealer network is not near as good as the Audi
They have improved their reliability according to the latest rankings, they can only get better really.
Jag all the way!
Deal breaker for me with Audi / VAG in particular is the lack of an opaque moon-roof cover. Gives me headaches , maybe it's just being here in California i d k but can't stand that
I think it's fine to have the option but need to have total darkness for sure. MB does this now as well!
John McPeck the infiniti qx50 has proper blind for the sunroof. I tested both these and ended up buying the qx50. Better value. And great fun to drive.
J O'Neill QX50 is total old junk. It's unrefined, looks just awful, and overpriced. I'm glad you got your little word in so you feel better about justifying your purchase. On the other hand, I feel bad for you! Archaic engine, old platform, horrible interior, UNREFINED, loud. Yah, I drove that shit box for 2 months in Japan. It's a NISSAN there BTW. Get a grip on reality - it is NOT a competitor to an Audi Q5. You are totally detached from reality.
n777ua haha keep trolling. Glad you feel better by not being able to afford any of them. 😊
Well seeing that I'm crossing the Pacific ocean in Seat 1K on a 747-400 in United First as we speak, I'd say I have no trouble affording them. Feel free to come to my channel and watch my recent Frankfurt-SFO trip in Seat 3K, United First Suite on the 747-400.
Like I said, I'm glad you got your word in. I'll be in Seoul for the next 2 weeks working with our crisis management team. What are you going to be doing? Have fun in the Nissan. Fun note: QX50 is the same car the embattled ex-DNC head Debby Washerman Schultz drives. It's the Pontiac Aztec for our generation - sad, frumpy, and for credit laggards who can't afford to finance a $50,000 German product.
6:44 Trying to hide that yawn 😂
"Low speed clumsiness" is Turbo Lag, Eddie....... Thats why your not on Vehicle Virgins anymore.....
Who cares about your personal opinions about any cars , we do not all have the same seeing and feeling in any cars it's all down to personal individual feels
F pace is a f pace and best look SUV out there , Q5 looks like a Q7 Q8 not unique and look like other Audi car ,,,, boring
Hey carlos! Dont you miss the excitement of running some.of this cars at the tracm with randy pobst?? This reviews arent aa engaging aa.the ones in motor trend homeboy next to you dont help at all... just saying
I don’t understand.....
Why not compare the 3.0 Q5 (not the SQ5) to the Jaguar?
I don’t wanna see a 4 cylinder compared to a V6 when the former has a V6 option as well.
iT Very Good
Sounds great give me some rythem
@2:00... First of all, the jag F-pace is a PERFORMANCE SUV, not a Luxury SUV. They don't even know the vehicle class of the jag.
An SQ5? would fare better, if they have a new one out yet.
You chose 35t over 25t, why don’t you chose Sq5 over Q5? Jaguar has the worst luxury quality. All junk materials, that’s why they always have quality issues.
Jaguar F-Pace hands down
My boy Ken Jeuong back at it again with another great review!
I'm Asian btw before someone calls me racist.
Carlos looks so small int he Q5's passenger seat. And no, the GLC is still the best interior.
Jaguar F pace
Love my Q5!! I'd purchase #AnotherOne
Audi 🤙
I watched this video because of Carlos. The other guy sounds like a low information talking head. When you start saying turbo has no lag, you are letting us know that you do not know much about automobiles.
I hope Carlos loses the other guy and does these comparison's himself. There is no chemistry between the duo. Period.
Q5 looks better in Manhattan grey
Audi has a better build and more luxurious interior. However, the engine is lacking power. To get more HP, you have to get the SQ5 which costs a lot more.
...You guys are BOTH Naught handles...LoL.....;-),,,,,,,
Duh.... There is over a 20,000 dollar difference in what you are comparing. What's next apples and oranges? You could at least compared the F-Pace to the SQ5
The Caucasian guy (Mr. sideburns) says "like" way too much. He sounds like a stupid Kardashian (Hey "sideburns", notice the correct use for "like"). I think the Q5 is the clear winner based on dependability factors between the two brands. Chances are it'll last much longer. Plus, its interior is quite a bit nicer.
Nice Head 2 Head
Uggg I hate SUVs
Lol
audi q5 wins, not even a comparison, transmission tech, safety tech, actually cheaper! (perhaps in usa they re the same), performance, and the audi seats DO recline. jag doesn t even has as much tech as average hatchback lol, any option throws the freaking car to even more insane prices. the lack of ergonomics when you put the window controls on the top of the door, what da heck jag??!!
carlos suits better ripping gtr and ferraris' in motortrend..coming from a q5 driver lol
Audi --- *yawn*
That Audi is a peace of rubbish compared to the Jaguar
3.0 liter vs 2.0 liter.
JLR reliability and quality are horrendous.
Liar.
Who cares about hearing a loud engine
Me
Me..as well.
Nickoy1 Channel Mee
Tesla
Nickoy1 Channel I do