Can we talk about George bush and Blair war crimes? If we don't, whosever war crimes we speak about makes us look exactly like hypocrites. The war criminals are in the US and Britain
No, we can't talk about George Bush and Tony Blair. If you do, you're going to be accused of practising "whataboutism". The cowardly people of USA and UK will tell you that you "shouldn't dwell in the past", because they want to shield their war criminal former leaders from facing justice. They will also tell you to stop talking about slavery and colonialism, and will advise you to "forget and move on".
@@Maria-EUthe gas attacks & other incidents were exposed in a doc by The Veto on syria war propaganda. I believe its on youtube. That journalist Arwa Damon staged reports for CNN in syria. The White helmets which were touted as humanitarian aids were exposed as terrorists staging rescue efforts. They would travel around with & stationed near terrorists locations even killing civilians to then record rescues & the aftermath. They claimed not to use weapons & in some incidents that were recorded they were armed, even standing on truckloads of dead syrian army soldiers.
@@paulster185? true both sides QQ about Al Jazeera which shows its authenticity. Arabs are just made at AJ cause AJ airs their dirty laundry and they don't like that.
Any American who tries to overthrow the American government goes to prison. The fact that people in Syria who try to over throw their government act like victims is absurd. They had a good country and they chose to destroy it and try to implement religious zealots who want to make their country like Iran.
@@thelastestsportnews According to Syrians who lived under Bashar, they didn't care or even think about the government. They would go along their days with friends and family.
Assad was defending the nation from terrorist agitators (financed and supported by Israel and the West) bent on the destruction of Syria. His acts were necessary to save the nation of Syria. USA steals oil from Syria every single day and occupies Syria illegally (like Israel occupies Palestine: birds of a feather)and supports ISIS and DAESH and the world could care less.
more than birds of a feather. The US government is literally run by zionists. They donate most of the money to both parties. Run virtually all the media and every thing in between. The US is really greater Israel.
Right,which is why Assad released terrorists into his own population,gassed his own people,and refused to let down power after decades. If Assad let down power,especially,the country wouldn't have destabilised. You have a very poor understanding of Assad's reign. I'm not saying the USA should be there but Assad is a terrible,terrible leader.
Islamist Qatar can't accept a secular Syria. Their jihadi proxies were wiped out so no wonder they're still sore over all the money they wasted. Thank you President Assad for preserving a free and religiously diverse Syria.
12 years into the crisis, still no proper definition of a "moderate Syrian rebels". We haven't forgotten about your crimes, Al-Jazeera, about inciting genocide on TV.
Assad bargained with ISIS for the release of nine Orthodox nuns - a good deed. He has protected minorities and majorities from the likes of ISIS. He saved Syria after an invasion of fanatics from many countries. He was one of the few with the courage to stand up to Israel. Qatar is wrong about him.
*Today, [Sept 13, 2023], YAHUVEH Almighty GOD says,* [Assad] Ben-Hadad = Aram, Syria's king(PM) “I will kindle a fire in the wall of Damascus, And it shall consume the palaces of Ben-Hadad.” *''Judgment on Damascus''* Jeremiah 49: 23-27) 23] “Hamath and Arpad are shamed, For they have heard bad news. They are fainthearted; There is trouble on the sea; It cannot be quiet. 24] Damascus has grown feeble; She turns to flee, And fear has seized her. Anguish and sorrows have taken her like a woman in [b]labor. 25] Why is the city of praise not deserted, the city of My joy? 26] Therefore her young men shall fall in her streets, And all the men of war shall be cut off in that day,” says the Lord of hosts. 27] “I will kindle a fire in the wall of Damascus, *And it shall consume the palaces of Ben-Hadad.”* *************************************** *Who was Ben-Hadad in the Bible?* [ANSWER] Ben-Hadad seems to have been the title of the reigning king of Aram (Syria). Ben-Hadad means “son of Hadad.” Hadad or Adad was the god of storm and thunder, and, as was common in that epoch of history, kings were seen as sons of the primary god of the region. In the Bible, Ben-Hadad, the king of Aram, is mentioned in 1 Kings 15:18-22; throughout 1 Kings 20; 2 Kings 6:24; 8:9; 13:24-25; 2Chronicles 16:2-4; Jeremiah 49:27; and Amos 1:4. *Since Ben-Hadad is a title much like Pharaoh or President, the term can refer to different* individuals at different times. The context of each passage must be studied to determine just who is involved. Most students of history accept the existence of three Ben-Hadads who ruled in Damascus: Ben-Hadad I, who ruled c. 900-860 BC; his son (or grandson) Ben-Hadad II, who ruled 860-841; and another, unrelated Ben-Hadad, the son of the man who assassinated Ben-Hadad II. In 1 Kings 15:18, Ben-Hadad is designated as the son of Tabrimmon, the son of Hezion. In this passage, King Asa of Judah makes a treaty with Ben-Hadad to help protect himself against the king of Israel, who was threatening Judah. (This is also recorded in 2 Chronicles 16:2-4.) Ben-Hadad sent soldiers against Israel and King Baasha and conquered a number of towns, bringing some relief to Judah. In 1 Kings 20, Ben-Hadad once again attacks the northern kingdom of Israel, where Ahab is now the king. It is possible that this is the same Ben-Hadad who attacked in 1 Kings 15, or it could be a son, Ben-Hadad II. It seems that this time Ben-Hadad is attacking on his own without consideration for any treaty with Judah. And this time, although he had 32 kings helping him (1 Kings 20:1), he is defeated by King Ahab and the army of Israel. About three years later, Israel and Syria renew their conflict, leading to Ahab’s final battle and death (1 Kings 22). In 2 Kings 6-7, about nine years after Ahab’s death, Ben-Hadad II invades Israel and lays siege to Samaria, the capital. The siege went on for so long that the people in the city were starving to death. However, in the middle of the night, the Lord caused the Aramean army to hear sounds of an advancing army. Thinking the king of Israel was receiving help from foreign nations, all of Ben-Hadad’s men fled, leaving everything behind. In 2 Kings 8, the prophet Elisha travels to Damascus and relays a paradoxical prophecy to Ben-Hadad II, who was ill: “Go and say to him, ‘You will certainly recover.’ Nevertheless, the Lord has revealed to me that he will in fact die” (verse 10). Just as Elisha said, Ben-Hadad began to recover from his illness, but then a man named Hazael murdered Ben-Hadad and took the throne of Aram. In 2 Kings 13, Hazael is succeeded by his son, who is also named Ben-Hadad. This final Ben-Hadad was defeated three times by king Jehoash of Israel, fulfilling another prophecy of Elisha (2 Kings 13:1-25). In Jeremiah 49:27, the Word of YAHUVEH [LORD GOD] says, *“I will set fire to the walls of Damascus; it will consume the fortresses of Ben-Hadad.”* At the time of Jeremiah’s prophecy, none of the Ben-Hadads mentioned above would have been alive. The reference may be to the current king of Aram or perhaps to a fortress that had been built by and now bore the name of a former king. *In Amos 1:4 we have a similar prophecy: “I will send fire on the house of Hazael that will* consume the fortresses of Ben-Hadad.” By this time, the original Ben-Hadad had been killed, and Hazael was king. As above, “the fortress of Ben-Hadad” could simply refer to a fortress of the current king [ president ] or to a specific fortress that was known by that name. *In summary, Ben-Hadad is the title of the Aramean king, “son of Hadad,” a prominent deity in* the region. Several kings of Aram had extensive interaction with the kingdom of Israel and attacked several times. The Lord God YAHUVEH used Ben-Hadad and the Arameans to bring judgment on rebellious Israel, but *YAH punished Aram[Syria] for her evil, as well.
Yah disappointed with @Al Jazeera on this report making Assad the badman while we all know. We was defending his Country a war sponsored by the West & US
He saved his motherland as he promised. He is not like others who bowed towards Zionists. So, be careful to pick the word. Do not try to portray him as war criminal; he is a true hero and patriot. Learn something before you say.😅
He is war criminal by definition of the word. But there were also serious attempts to overthrow him by US, using Jihadists and thus making Syria literal horror show. Therefore I'm actually glad he is welcomed back to Arab League, not because I like him, but because the people have suffered so much and they need some kind of stability and future.
Indeed.I cannot understand how an uprising that was purely influenced by outsiders is his fault.They should have let Syria be.All the destruction and death who benefited?
@@zrusit9640 what about George Bush, Tony Blair and Obama, you and this host have conveniently left them out. They are the true war criminals that the West refused to talk about them
The scariest part of this video is the fact that the United States is actively trying to incite another civil war in Syria, but they frame the guy trying to move past the violence as the crook.
Literally if you look at the people he’s fighting they’re absolutely disgusting. He’s fighting ISIS and Nusrah and Al-Qaeda. These are literal terrorists and people forget that those are the majority of his enemies that he’s fighting. Gassing Syrian people to send a message is not above ISIS and Al-Qaeda and Nusrah is literally partnered with them
@@owenhoong88 The people you met may be nice but the Qatari government explicitly supports extremist groups like the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt and other countries. Their Al Jazeera news also supports them but it’s even worse in Al Jazeera’s Arabic news channel calling for these extremists groups to overthrow the government. That’s one of the reasons why Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, UAE and Egypt decided to blockade Qatar before.
Bashar Al Assad and Syria are not like those Saran countries who normalize with Israel. He is the reason that the Palestinian arm struggle is still continuing
Ex CIA: "CIA plan was to overthrow, saddam Hussain, Mumar Kadaffi, Bashar Al Asad and Islamic Republic of Iran" so you should think and decide who the actual war crime is.... Putin : "we (russia) made a mistake in Libya and did not interfere in Libya" that says something about constant wars in certain regions mainly where USA has less control
Syria was saved by Asahd and russia thanks to him he is indeed a hero. western governments lost their war in Syria , all syrians can now go back and rebuild their country.
Peace... "Cap" is a slang term that originated in the United States and is commonly used in African American Vernacular English (AAVE). It means to lie or to make a false statement... Thank you and I agree with you... My heart goes out to the Syrians left behind who have been suffering under the sanctions, embargo, and usurpation of GDP with the occupation and destruction of oil, cotton, and wheat fields... May Allah (SWTA) Bless us all with Peace and Ease and Strenth,and Resilience and Good Health Bi'ithini ta'Allah... Take care and be true to your heart With Peace and Divine Loving Consciousness Sakinah Al Qaadir Alhamdulilah
10:05 you can tell his wife is dead inside, and that she knows she is stuck with a mass murderer and that he can have her killed too if she dont cooperates
This channel is own by Qatar and I have always wondered why it does not side with its people and continues to tell lie upon lies, always on the side of the West, those who would not hesitate to turn their backs on Qatar. Or do the Qataris feel they are Westerners? This video obscenely misrepresents reality.
Do you really think this channel is unbiased at all? Do you really not think it portrays some sides over the others the benefits it’s negative at all.?
@@Nimrod85 Hi! I've been missing you! Good question and I answer you with the following, I have been following this channel for a long time and it rarely says anything that is not related to political-corporate interests of some kind. This happens in most channels that are sponsored, remember that money talks. It has bothered me in particular that this channel, belonging to the Qatari government, is so anti its own people, if you notice most of its presenters or "journalists" are English and I have seen them lie shamelessly not only once but many times. It portrays the same side as most western channels, there is no surprise or deference.
@@AngelaRodhas well, as an Israeli, I must say that I do not recall seeing any article or video that portrays anything but the Palestinian side and I’m not getting into who’s right who’s wrong here? I’m just saying they were always on their side. Israel was always the enemy according to them, so regardless of where you stand, you gotta admit that even this doesn’t really make a good statistics plus, keep in mind. Yes, it is owned by Katav and these are the same people that wire millions of dollars to the Gaza Strip in support of Hamas. There is a connection and reason for them to portray them in a positive light. They are the air investment and again we’re not getting into who’s right who’s wrong but there is a narrative.
@@Nimrod85 I understand your point of view, I believe that if the "trees would let us see the forest", as the saying goes, maybe we would even be on the same side, but for now we (the people) are only "allowed" to see some of the bigger picture. Qatar is a U.S. ally and its financial support of Hamas has to do with the U.S. interest in destroying Iran, even if it doesn't appear to be so. I guess you won't believe that they came out of Afghanistan defeated leaving billions of dollars in weaponry that they will now start using against Iran with any excuse, for example, some water rights and so it escalates. It should not be ignored that the main interest of the United States is to dismember the Middle East, as they did with Yugoslavia. They tried to do so in Iraq and things did not work out very well. They tried to do it in Syria and they also failed but they will not stop trying. All the others players are a sort of useful fools to that end and Israel may be part of that. I can't speak to you on that subject because I haven't studied it in depth enough to speak on a basis, but I'm on it. I think at this point you have to take off the patriotic flag and look a little bit at the interests of humanity as a whole because soon we will be in a civil war against the machines and the few who control them. I don't know if you understand what I'm trying to tell you.
@@AngelaRodhas the US has this hero complex where I admit, they fight wars that are not theirs, and I do have to say that them, leaving behind a military equipment in billions of dollars for the Afghanistan was arguably the best and smartest military move of the century. Perhaps they knew it was a matter of time before those two would clash, and I think it was a brilliant move, because look over water they break out a war. Do you want to be neighbors to countries like this? There’s no reasoning behind any thing they’ll start a war or literally anything and same goes for Israel. There’s nothing that we do is good enough. Every little thing has consequences and sadly those consequences require us to retaliate because we will not stand for those conditions you can believe it and you cannot. If you look again, you’ll see Israel‘s main focus was on defense systems not all fans it does not go in target random places it does not go and declare war against other countries the US has its interest in the location because this is his only ally in the Middle East and we take their participants and assistant with grain of salt because you never know we are our own savior and we don’t really believe we need to rely on them in the last minute, because that could be a tragedy as for Iran, and who are their enemies or not, I do not know, but I can tell you that it is it matter much, because as an Israeli Qatar won’t acknowledge my nationality. What does that tell you about their treatment towards Israel in its whole, the fund, a group of extremists whatever the reasons may be, but they do same with this channel, if you can tell me you’ll watch is really news and not flinch and say maybe that’s not accurate then you can say the same about Al Jazeera but each media outlet or each reporter chooses what to show people so my recommendation is always compare and look elsewhere I don’t rely on my media alone. I was blessed with a second and third language I am reading in other countries as well I use other factors to measure a situation such as economy fluctuation in the end of the day people don’t remember that the war is not good for business and you lose a lot of money so we would happily live without that not to mention when you turn 18 and you recruited the army you probably can tell if you would live through it you just have to be at the wrong place at the wrong time and he won’t make it till you’re 21 November. Does that sound like a reality we wanna live in or do you think we can find a way to live in peace and actually would prefer to do so.?
the protesters were armed and killing police and civilians alike and had an agenda of bringing about a some radial ideology in power. This wasn't a peaceful protest at all. Bashar assad is very popular among syrian but widely hated by ...muslim brotherhood that were slaughtered by syrian army and russian air power. The muslim brotherhood was supported by the West and nations like qatar. The west wanted to get rid of assad due to his independent policy. Assad glad you are well and may allah protect you from the imperialistic west and the barbaric muslim brotherhood.
Normally a regular viewer and in support of Al Jazeera but the Turkish section was mistranslated completely, he did not even mention refugees in that clip he said "I never sat at the table with Terrorists and neither will I in future, period." Please sort this out it doesn't make sense at all and is bad journalism because it's misinformation, thanks
It doesn't seam that the information is about its content but about the presentation. How the reporter or the author omitted the main reason for the unrest in Syria right at the beginning of his broadcast. I stop watching in less than 20 seconds. Syria is lucky they have the Russians to thank. As for Al Jazeera you may be next on the destabilization list.
The world should just leave Syria alone. Let them figure out how to rebuild their country. It was running just fine before, and they can rebuild it. The recent earthquake was enough to know how the world can take care of Syrian people. They had help that was next to none. Leave them alone bow so that they can function normally.
Al Jazeera English *Today, [Sept 13, 2023], YAHUVEH Almighty GOD says,* [Assad] Ben-Hadad = Aram, Syria's king(PM) “I will kindle a fire in the wall of Damascus, And it shall consume the palaces of Ben-Hadad.” *''Judgment on Damascus''* Jeremiah 49: 23-27) 23] “Hamath and Arpad are shamed, For they have heard bad news. They are fainthearted; There is trouble on the sea; It cannot be quiet. 24] Damascus has grown feeble; She turns to flee, And fear has seized her. Anguish and sorrows have taken her like a woman in [b]labor. 25] Why is the city of praise not deserted, the city of My joy? 26] Therefore her young men shall fall in her streets, And all the men of war shall be cut off in that day,” says the Lord of hosts. 27] “I will kindle a fire in the wall of Damascus, *And it shall consume the palaces of Ben-Hadad.”* *************************************** *Who was Ben-Hadad in the Bible?* [ANSWER] Ben-Hadad seems to have been the title of the reigning king of Aram (Syria). Ben-Hadad means “son of Hadad.” Hadad or Adad was the god of storm and thunder, and, as was common in that epoch of history, kings were seen as sons of the primary god of the region. In the Bible, Ben-Hadad, the king of Aram, is mentioned in 1 Kings 15:18-22; throughout 1 Kings 20; 2 Kings 6:24; 8:9; 13:24-25; 2Chronicles 16:2-4; Jeremiah 49:27; and Amos 1:4. *Since Ben-Hadad is a title much like Pharaoh or President, the term can refer to different* individuals at different times. The context of each passage must be studied to determine just who is involved. Most students of history accept the existence of three Ben-Hadads who ruled in Damascus: Ben-Hadad I, who ruled c. 900-860 BC; his son (or grandson) Ben-Hadad II, who ruled 860-841; and another, unrelated Ben-Hadad, the son of the man who assassinated Ben-Hadad II. In 1 Kings 15:18, Ben-Hadad is designated as the son of Tabrimmon, the son of Hezion. In this passage, King Asa of Judah makes a treaty with Ben-Hadad to help protect himself against the king of Israel, who was threatening Judah. (This is also recorded in 2 Chronicles 16:2-4.) Ben-Hadad sent soldiers against Israel and King Baasha and conquered a number of towns, bringing some relief to Judah. In 1 Kings 20, Ben-Hadad once again attacks the northern kingdom of Israel, where Ahab is now the king. It is possible that this is the same Ben-Hadad who attacked in 1 Kings 15, or it could be a son, Ben-Hadad II. It seems that this time Ben-Hadad is attacking on his own without consideration for any treaty with Judah. And this time, although he had 32 kings helping him (1 Kings 20:1), he is defeated by King Ahab and the army of Israel. About three years later, Israel and Syria renew their conflict, leading to Ahab’s final battle and death (1 Kings 22). In 2 Kings 6-7, about nine years after Ahab’s death, Ben-Hadad II invades Israel and lays siege to Samaria, the capital. The siege went on for so long that the people in the city were starving to death. However, in the middle of the night, the Lord caused the Aramean army to hear sounds of an advancing army. Thinking the king of Israel was receiving help from foreign nations, all of Ben-Hadad’s men fled, leaving everything behind. In 2 Kings 8, the prophet Elisha travels to Damascus and relays a paradoxical prophecy to Ben-Hadad II, who was ill: “Go and say to him, ‘You will certainly recover.’ Nevertheless, the Lord has revealed to me that he will in fact die” (verse 10). Just as Elisha said, Ben-Hadad began to recover from his illness, but then a man named Hazael murdered Ben-Hadad and took the throne of Aram. In 2 Kings 13, Hazael is succeeded by his son, who is also named Ben-Hadad. This final Ben-Hadad was defeated three times by king Jehoash of Israel, fulfilling another prophecy of Elisha (2 Kings 13:1-25). In Jeremiah 49:27, the Word of YAHUVEH [LORD GOD] says, *“I will set fire to the walls of Damascus; it will consume the fortresses of Ben-Hadad.”* At the time of Jeremiah’s prophecy, none of the Ben-Hadads mentioned above would have been alive. The reference may be to the current king of Aram or perhaps to a fortress that had been built by and now bore the name of a former king. *In Amos 1:4 we have a similar prophecy: “I will send fire on the house of Hazael that will* consume the fortresses of Ben-Hadad.” By this time, the original Ben-Hadad had been killed, and Hazael was king. As above, “the fortress of Ben-Hadad” could simply refer to a fortress of the current king [ president ] or to a specific fortress that was known by that name. *In summary, Ben-Hadad is the title of the Aramean king, “son of Hadad,” a prominent deity in* the region. Several kings of Aram had extensive interaction with the kingdom of Israel and attacked several times. The Lord God YAHUVEH used Ben-Hadad and the Arameans to bring judgment on rebellious Israel, but *YAH punished Aram[Syria] for her evil, as well.
Talking about crime against humanity...... We all know where to point our finger at. The left side of the compass is the sources of all atrocities on this planet.
Western seen him bad person! But he saved his country not collapse as Somalia and Yeman. If Somali well developed sites every sectors compared the rest of African country in short period holding the power dictator had not infiltrated western in the civil war, somalia might survived as Syria and somalia wouldn't ended place people sees enemy each other.
*GEORGE BUSH AND TONY BLAIR JUST CHILLING OUT THERE*
Bush and Blair didn’t use chemical weapons on their own people
How can you blame Assad seeing what happened in Libya the guy had to safe himself. Also the West & the US sponsored the Rebels & the protest
Except they didn’t kill thousands of their own people like Assad did.
It's even laughably after Qatari government failed to ouster Assad.... He is going nowhere, better get use to it
Long live Assad !!!
Syria has a lot of problem but has good friends with Iran and Russia
Syria has lots of reconstruction to do and zero help from the West
Israel is still attacking Syria and Syria needs better missiles to shoot down Israeli jets
Time for Syria to take back the Golan heights
The Qatari government isn't exactly an unbiased third party in all this.
No they were allied with ISIS
Can we talk about George bush and Blair war crimes? If we don't, whosever war crimes we speak about makes us look exactly like hypocrites. The war criminals are in the US and Britain
No, we can't talk about George Bush and Tony Blair. If you do, you're going to be accused of practising "whataboutism". The cowardly people of USA and UK will tell you that you "shouldn't dwell in the past", because they want to shield their war criminal former leaders from facing justice. They will also tell you to stop talking about slavery and colonialism, and will advise you to "forget and move on".
Indeed justice for all.. 👌🏻
Bush for sure is talked about but like Assad, the crimes just go unpunished.
This is whataboutism and it has been talked abouut 100000 million times.
@@Maria-EUthe gas attacks & other incidents were exposed in a doc by The Veto on syria war propaganda. I believe its on youtube. That journalist Arwa Damon staged reports for CNN in syria. The White helmets which were touted as humanitarian aids were exposed as terrorists staging rescue efforts. They would travel around with & stationed near terrorists locations even killing civilians to then record rescues & the aftermath. They claimed not to use weapons & in some incidents that were recorded they were armed, even standing on truckloads of dead syrian army soldiers.
Al Jazeera can cry all night long🤡
qatar funded the terrorists that started the war in syria.
Bashars time is limited. He should've listened to the west and stepped down while he had the chance. Another terrorist for us to take out ig
We remember the al Jazeera role. You cooperated with the west against the people of the region. Shame on you.
Yes we remember them for exposing Assad's crimes. Any word on the tens of thousands of Syrians being tortured to death in Assad's prisons?
When every side thinks that you are biased in favour of their opponents it's proof of your objectivity.
@@paulster185? true both sides QQ about Al Jazeera which shows its authenticity. Arabs are just made at AJ cause AJ airs their dirty laundry and they don't like that.
Algezira is run by c.i.a
That is incorrect. They are antiwest... what are you talking about?
Any American who tries to overthrow the American government goes to prison. The fact that people in Syria who try to over throw their government act like victims is absurd. They had a good country and they chose to destroy it and try to implement religious zealots who want to make their country like Iran.
Except the Syrian one gets tortured, his family members get detained unlike the american one
Exactly, please spread this to counter the lies of the terrorists who destroyed Syria
?? Had a good country so all the torture of children women and innocent men, the shooting at unarmed protestors was having a good country ? Bruh
Do you have any idea what it was like living under Bashar’s dictatorship?
@@thelastestsportnews According to Syrians who lived under Bashar, they didn't care or even think about the government. They would go along their days with friends and family.
Before American foreign policy,Syria was a great country...... now......
Assad was defending the nation from terrorist agitators (financed and supported by Israel and the West) bent on the destruction of Syria. His acts were necessary to save the nation of Syria. USA steals oil from Syria every single day and occupies Syria illegally (like Israel occupies Palestine: birds of a feather)and supports ISIS and DAESH and the world could care less.
more than birds of a feather. The US government is literally run by zionists. They donate most of the money to both parties. Run virtually all the media and every thing in between. The US is really greater Israel.
💯💯💯
Right,which is why Assad released terrorists into his own population,gassed his own people,and refused to let down power after decades. If Assad let down power,especially,the country wouldn't have destabilised. You have a very poor understanding of Assad's reign. I'm not saying the USA should be there but Assad is a terrible,terrible leader.
bruh really thats what you think i see now every body is using usa as a cuase to destroy his own pp
Then what is happening in Gaza is also necessary to save the nation of Israel from Hamas
Shame on these reporters. A bunch of IS fan boys and their creators in the alleys. Long live President Bashar al-Assad!
Yep, and that stupid ARAB SPRING created by the west which everyone fell for !
المجرم الظالم بشار
لعن الله على بشار الأسد
Yes he lived longer than my friends whole family after killing them
You are not talking about George Bush
as Criminal of War, Killer of Saddam??
You'd never mentioned about Israel's PMs
who killed Palestines. 😂😂
Not to mention the other war criminal Blair 👍🏼
Assad starved the Palestinians in the Palestinian refugee camp el yarmuch
@@yellowmask1796that was isis and the FSA
@sub_zero8495 No it wasn't when they were interviewed starving it was under Assads control, lie to someone else
Islamist Qatar can't accept a secular Syria. Their jihadi proxies were wiped out so no wonder they're still sore over all the money they wasted. Thank you President Assad for preserving a free and religiously diverse Syria.
12 years into the crisis, still no proper definition of a "moderate Syrian rebels". We haven't forgotten about your crimes, Al-Jazeera, about inciting genocide on TV.
Long live Assad❤
Assad bargained with ISIS for the release of nine Orthodox nuns - a good deed. He has protected minorities and majorities from the likes of ISIS. He saved Syria after an invasion of fanatics from many countries. He was one of the few with the courage to stand up to Israel. Qatar is wrong about him.
Very wrong indeed
@@Orto-jj2di just keep watching cnn you fool
Qatar is not even a real country, it's a U.S. military occupied zone.
*Today, [Sept 13, 2023], YAHUVEH Almighty GOD says,*
[Assad] Ben-Hadad = Aram, Syria's king(PM)
“I will kindle a fire in the wall of Damascus,
And it shall consume the palaces of Ben-Hadad.”
*''Judgment on Damascus''*
Jeremiah 49: 23-27)
23] “Hamath and Arpad are shamed,
For they have heard bad news.
They are fainthearted;
There is trouble on the sea; It cannot be quiet.
24] Damascus has grown feeble;
She turns to flee, And fear has seized her.
Anguish and sorrows have taken her like a woman in [b]labor.
25] Why is the city of praise not deserted, the city of My joy?
26] Therefore her young men shall fall in her streets,
And all the men of war shall be cut off in that day,” says the Lord of hosts.
27] “I will kindle a fire in the wall of Damascus,
*And it shall consume the palaces of Ben-Hadad.”*
***************************************
*Who was Ben-Hadad in the Bible?*
[ANSWER] Ben-Hadad seems to have been the title of the reigning king of Aram (Syria).
Ben-Hadad means “son of Hadad.” Hadad or Adad was the god of storm and thunder, and, as was common in that epoch of history, kings were seen as sons of the primary god of the region.
In the Bible, Ben-Hadad, the king of Aram, is mentioned in 1 Kings 15:18-22; throughout
1 Kings 20; 2 Kings 6:24; 8:9; 13:24-25; 2Chronicles 16:2-4; Jeremiah 49:27; and Amos 1:4. *Since Ben-Hadad is a title much like Pharaoh or President, the term can refer to different* individuals at different times. The context of each passage must be studied to determine just who is involved. Most students of history accept the existence of three Ben-Hadads who ruled in Damascus: Ben-Hadad I, who ruled c. 900-860 BC; his son (or grandson) Ben-Hadad II, who ruled 860-841; and another, unrelated Ben-Hadad, the son of the man who assassinated Ben-Hadad II.
In 1 Kings 15:18,
Ben-Hadad is designated as the son of Tabrimmon, the son of Hezion. In this passage, King Asa of Judah makes a treaty with Ben-Hadad to help protect himself against the king of Israel, who was threatening Judah. (This is also recorded in 2 Chronicles 16:2-4.) Ben-Hadad sent soldiers against Israel and King Baasha and conquered a number of towns, bringing some relief to Judah.
In 1 Kings 20,
Ben-Hadad once again attacks the northern kingdom of Israel, where Ahab is now the king. It is possible that this is the same Ben-Hadad who attacked in 1 Kings 15, or it could be a son, Ben-Hadad II. It seems that this time Ben-Hadad is attacking on his own without consideration for any treaty with Judah. And this time, although he had 32 kings helping him (1 Kings 20:1), he is defeated by King Ahab and the army of Israel. About three years later, Israel and Syria renew their conflict, leading to Ahab’s final battle and death (1 Kings 22).
In 2 Kings 6-7,
about nine years after Ahab’s death,
Ben-Hadad II invades Israel and lays siege to Samaria, the capital. The siege went on for so long that the people in the city were starving to death. However, in the middle of the night, the Lord caused the Aramean army to hear sounds of an advancing army. Thinking the king of Israel was receiving help from foreign nations, all of Ben-Hadad’s men fled, leaving everything behind.
In 2 Kings 8,
the prophet Elisha travels to Damascus and relays a paradoxical prophecy to Ben-Hadad II,
who was ill: “Go and say to him, ‘You will certainly recover.’ Nevertheless, the Lord has revealed to me that he will in fact die” (verse 10). Just as Elisha said, Ben-Hadad began to recover from his illness, but then a man named Hazael murdered Ben-Hadad and took the throne of Aram. In 2 Kings 13, Hazael is succeeded by his son, who is also named Ben-Hadad. This final Ben-Hadad was defeated three times by king Jehoash of Israel, fulfilling another prophecy of Elisha (2 Kings 13:1-25).
In Jeremiah 49:27,
the Word of YAHUVEH [LORD GOD] says,
*“I will set fire to the walls of Damascus; it will consume the fortresses of Ben-Hadad.”*
At the time of Jeremiah’s prophecy, none of the Ben-Hadads mentioned above would have been alive. The reference may be to the current king of Aram or perhaps to a fortress that had been built by and now bore the name of a former king.
*In Amos 1:4 we have a similar prophecy: “I will send fire on the house of Hazael that will* consume the fortresses of Ben-Hadad.” By this time, the original Ben-Hadad had been killed, and Hazael was king. As above, “the fortress of Ben-Hadad” could simply refer to a fortress of the current king [ president ] or to a specific fortress that was known by that name.
*In summary, Ben-Hadad is the title of the Aramean king, “son of Hadad,” a prominent deity in* the region. Several kings of Aram had extensive interaction with the kingdom of Israel and attacked several times. The Lord God YAHUVEH used Ben-Hadad and the Arameans to bring judgment on rebellious Israel, but *YAH punished Aram[Syria] for her evil, as well.
So the jihadists he released from prison in 2011 were what? What exactly was that?
These people in media have no soul. Constantly spreading propaganda and going home to sleep like nothing happened is beyond me
Because they were bought by western masters...
Assad is a true leader that saved his people of the foreign wahabi radicals
Wahabi terrorists supported by Saudia and USA
Dear AJ...the fact that USA still is trying to colonize Syria is not a headline on your channel is very concerning
Yah disappointed with @Al Jazeera on this report making Assad the badman while we all know. We was defending his Country a war sponsored by the West & US
as long as the US was involved its shameful to accuse asad of anything
Does the woman at beginning considers the civil war in Syria Assad's war crime?
He saved his motherland as he promised. He is not like others who bowed towards Zionists. So, be careful to pick the word. Do not try to portray him as war criminal; he is a true hero and patriot. Learn something before you say.😅
He is war criminal by definition of the word. But there were also serious attempts to overthrow him by US, using Jihadists and thus making Syria literal horror show. Therefore I'm actually glad he is welcomed back to Arab League, not because I like him, but because the people have suffered so much and they need some kind of stability and future.
The F* is wrong with you? Just lookup how many people hes killed its not hard.
Indeed.I cannot understand how an uprising that was purely influenced by outsiders is his fault.They should have let Syria be.All the destruction and death who benefited?
@@zrusit9640 what about George Bush, Tony Blair and Obama, you and this host have conveniently left them out. They are the true war criminals that the West refused to talk about them
He is a traitor of his own people as well as a war criminal and just a criminal in general.
Crime against humanity when done by an Arab.
Delivery of democracy when done by an American..
What about Netanyahu aka the crime minister?
Didn't you hear? Israel is untouchable, above the law, and can do whatever they want
They already talked about netanyahu war crimes multiple times
@@godwinmarvo9012 One is one too many, one more is never enough
The scariest part of this video is the fact that the United States is actively trying to incite another civil war in Syria, but they frame the guy trying to move past the violence as the crook.
Syria was a lot safer when he was the undisputed leader of the country. These countries need an iron hand to work.
It just doesn't make any sense to me they still have not Explain his motive for why he would have gassed his own people.
He didn't, the extremists used gas to try and frame his so they could remove him from power and say he's a bad guy, it's well documented...
He did not gas his own people you sheep
Literally if you look at the people he’s fighting they’re absolutely disgusting. He’s fighting
ISIS and Nusrah and Al-Qaeda. These are literal terrorists and people forget that those are the majority of his enemies that he’s fighting. Gassing Syrian people to send a message is not above ISIS and Al-Qaeda and Nusrah is literally partnered with them
@@rksocal2828 Exactly. The White helmets.
He did not, it was Jabbat Al Nursra
Qatar is sad that the ji hadis like IS and Al Nusra Front didn’t win.
Why? What Qatar has to do with IS? Care to explain?
@@owenhoong88 Qatar supports them
@@artman12 No. Qatar is a good country. Yes, its a Muslim country but they are not extremists. I've been there. They're nice people.
Qatar is bowing to Israel .
@@owenhoong88 The people you met may be nice but the Qatari government explicitly supports extremist groups like the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt and other countries. Their Al Jazeera news also supports them but it’s even worse in Al Jazeera’s Arabic news channel calling for these extremists groups to overthrow the government. That’s one of the reasons why Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, UAE and Egypt decided to blockade Qatar before.
meanwhile Zelensky is using cluster bombs, which the US deemed a war crime but is being praised as a hero
The lion of the levant Bashar Al Assad. Great man and leader.
This man is evil. period.
Not as evil as George Bush.
Western propoganda channel.
Propaganda is blaming the West for Syria 🤡
Yep , that's two faced Al Jazeera for you !!
Lol it’s funny because Al Jazeera is making 24/7 anti west propaganda.
Aljazeera now do one about labour and workplace crimes committed by QATAR.
No accountability, just pure unbridled hypocrisy
The Arabs Has to Unite for their Survival
Long live assad
ARREST BENJAMIN NATANYAHU
Thank you BBC
*Syria🇸🇾 have border disputes with IsraeL.*
make border agreement & keep peace!
сирийская провинция оккупирована израилем
As a syrian I see that Israel keeping the height for its straregec value while giving us the Golan land will be the best solution
long live Basar
Usa , hands out of siria .
Horrendous war criminal...😡
At first I thought this was about Henry Kissinger or GeorgeBush or his son or maybe about Obama!
Shame on war criminals 😢
Bashar Al Assad and Syria are not like those Saran countries who normalize with Israel. He is the reason that the Palestinian arm struggle is still continuing
Ex CIA: "CIA plan was to overthrow, saddam Hussain, Mumar Kadaffi, Bashar Al Asad and Islamic Republic of Iran" so you should think and decide who the actual war crime is....
Putin : "we (russia) made a mistake in Libya and did not interfere in Libya" that says something about constant wars in certain regions mainly where USA has less control
Syria was saved by Asahd and russia thanks to him he is indeed a hero. western governments lost their war in Syria , all syrians can now go back and rebuild their country.
Reading these comments made me realize people are actually getting smarter 😂❤❤
King Salman is a Visionary!❤❤❤
In who’s eyes 🤣🤣🤣🤣 the man’s a tyrant
Scared of his own people 😂
Who locks up all his opponents and kills his critics? Revolutionary.
Boot licker and slave of Israel 😂😂😂
I have just learned about war crumes of Bashar al-Asad he is inhumane
As a syrian I want to say one thing pls if you can hear me ....
*"CAP"*
Peace...
"Cap" is a slang term that originated in the United States and is commonly used in African American Vernacular English (AAVE).
It means to lie or to make a false statement...
Thank you and I agree with you...
My heart goes out to the Syrians left behind who have been suffering under the sanctions, embargo, and usurpation of GDP with the occupation and destruction of oil, cotton, and wheat fields...
May Allah (SWTA) Bless us all with Peace and Ease and Strenth,and Resilience and Good Health
Bi'ithini ta'Allah...
Take care and be true to your heart
With Peace and Divine Loving Consciousness
Sakinah
Al Qaadir Alhamdulilah
He goes free. Yes, like Clinton, Bush, Obama, Biden, Blair....All warcriminals, massmurders...Swell. 😮
This is soo true. Assad is back by the west
Assad is the true leader of Syria. Not Jabat al Nusra or ISIS.
Qataris terorists supporter crying 😂😂😂😂
The best feeling of my life 😎😏
U cannot mossad the Assad 😏😎
10:05 you can tell his wife is dead inside, and that she knows she is stuck with a mass murderer and that he can have her killed too if she dont cooperates
Wow ! I think you have a career in mind reading. Especially the women type.
@@radioclash84 it's called profiling 😁 and thank you.
Sounds similar to normalisation of Tony Blair and G Bush. Bunch of media fools
This channel is own by Qatar and I have always wondered why it does not side with its people and continues to tell lie upon lies, always on the side of the West, those who would not hesitate to turn their backs on Qatar. Or do the Qataris feel they are Westerners? This video obscenely misrepresents reality.
Do you really think this channel is unbiased at all? Do you really not think it portrays some sides over the others the benefits it’s negative at all.?
@@Nimrod85 Hi! I've been missing you! Good question and I answer you with the following, I have been following this channel for a long time and it rarely says anything that is not related to political-corporate interests of some kind. This happens in most channels that are sponsored, remember that money talks. It has bothered me in particular that this channel, belonging to the Qatari government, is so anti its own people, if you notice most of its presenters or "journalists" are English and I have seen them lie shamelessly not only once but many times. It portrays the same side as most western channels, there is no surprise or deference.
@@AngelaRodhas well, as an Israeli, I must say that I do not recall seeing any article or video that portrays anything but the Palestinian side and I’m not getting into who’s right who’s wrong here? I’m just saying they were always on their side. Israel was always the enemy according to them, so regardless of where you stand, you gotta admit that even this doesn’t really make a good statistics plus, keep in mind. Yes, it is owned by Katav and these are the same people that wire millions of dollars to the Gaza Strip in support of Hamas. There is a connection and reason for them to portray them in a positive light. They are the air investment and again we’re not getting into who’s right who’s wrong but there is a narrative.
@@Nimrod85 I understand your point of view, I believe that if the "trees would let us see the forest", as the saying goes, maybe we would even be on the same side, but for now we (the people) are only "allowed" to see some of the bigger picture. Qatar is a U.S. ally and its financial support of Hamas has to do with the U.S. interest in destroying Iran, even if it doesn't appear to be so. I guess you won't believe that they came out of Afghanistan defeated leaving billions of dollars in weaponry that they will now start using against Iran with any excuse, for example, some water rights and so it escalates. It should not be ignored that the main interest of the United States is to dismember the Middle East, as they did with Yugoslavia. They tried to do so in Iraq and things did not work out very well. They tried to do it in Syria and they also failed but they will not stop trying. All the others players are a sort of useful fools to that end and Israel may be part of that. I can't speak to you on that subject because I haven't studied it in depth enough to speak on a basis, but I'm on it. I think at this point you have to take off the patriotic flag and look a little bit at the interests of humanity as a whole because soon we will be in a civil war against the machines and the few who control them. I don't know if you understand what I'm trying to tell you.
@@AngelaRodhas the US has this hero complex where I admit, they fight wars that are not theirs, and I do have to say that them, leaving behind a military equipment in billions of dollars for the Afghanistan was arguably the best and smartest military move of the century. Perhaps they knew it was a matter of time before those two would clash, and I think it was a brilliant move, because look over water they break out a war. Do you want to be neighbors to countries like this? There’s no reasoning behind any thing they’ll start a war or literally anything and same goes for Israel. There’s nothing that we do is good enough. Every little thing has consequences and sadly those consequences require us to retaliate because we will not stand for those conditions you can believe it and you cannot. If you look again, you’ll see Israel‘s main focus was on defense systems not all fans it does not go in target random places it does not go and declare war against other countries the US has its interest in the location because this is his only ally in the Middle East and we take their participants and assistant with grain of salt because you never know we are our own savior and we don’t really believe we need to rely on them in the last minute, because that could be a tragedy as for Iran, and who are their enemies or not, I do not know, but I can tell you that it is it matter much, because as an Israeli Qatar won’t acknowledge my nationality. What does that tell you about their treatment towards Israel in its whole, the fund, a group of extremists whatever the reasons may be, but they do same with this channel, if you can tell me you’ll watch is really news and not flinch and say maybe that’s not accurate then you can say the same about Al Jazeera but each media outlet or each reporter chooses what to show people so my recommendation is always compare and look elsewhere I don’t rely on my media alone. I was blessed with a second and third language I am reading in other countries as well I use other factors to measure a situation such as economy fluctuation in the end of the day people don’t remember that the war is not good for business and you lose a lot of money so we would happily live without that not to mention when you turn 18 and you recruited the army you probably can tell if you would live through it you just have to be at the wrong place at the wrong time and he won’t make it till you’re 21 November. Does that sound like a reality we wanna live in or do you think we can find a way to live in peace and actually would prefer to do so.?
Long live Asad
Trying too hard Al Jazeera
Qatar tried tirelessly to topple Assad, Al Jazeera is Qatari government sponsored.
the protesters were armed and killing police and civilians alike and had an agenda of bringing about a some radial ideology in power. This wasn't a peaceful protest at all. Bashar assad is very popular among syrian but widely hated by ...muslim brotherhood that were slaughtered by syrian army and russian air power. The muslim brotherhood was supported by the West and nations like qatar. The west wanted to get rid of assad due to his independent policy. Assad glad you are well and may allah protect you from the imperialistic west and the barbaric muslim brotherhood.
in my opinion criminal asad is no different from other autocrats in d region..
Normally a regular viewer and in support of Al Jazeera but the Turkish section was mistranslated completely, he did not even mention refugees in that clip he said "I never sat at the table with Terrorists and neither will I in future, period." Please sort this out it doesn't make sense at all and is bad journalism because it's misinformation, thanks
It doesn't seam that the information is about its content but about the presentation. How the reporter or the author omitted the main reason for the unrest in Syria right at the beginning of his broadcast. I stop watching in less than 20 seconds. Syria is lucky they have the Russians to thank. As for Al Jazeera you may be next on the destabilization list.
I think al jazeera needs to make the same documentary on western american war mongers!!!!!
They already did.
Al jazeera run 24/7 anti west propaganda. lol
poor guy. nato invaders are still occupying his country, and he is the one portrayed as the bad guy
There's an old saying in the Middle East. You can't Mossad the Assad.
Assad is an indirect ally of israel.
I love Uncle Roger, I hope you help him stay safe and bring joy to PEOPLE!
I know it’s irrelevant but the news reporter sounds exactly like Hugh Laurie.
U can't mossad the Assad
6:09 totally wrong translation. He is saying, that he has never sit at the same table with any terrorist organisations and will never do.
What about UNO's war crime
Which one?
Your propaganda failed Qatar!
Los líderes criminales se ayudan y protegen mutuamente, siempre que haya intereses de poder y económicos de por medio. Todo pasa después....
The world should just leave Syria alone. Let them figure out how to rebuild their country. It was running just fine before, and they can rebuild it.
The recent earthquake was enough to know how the world can take care of Syrian people. They had help that was next to none. Leave them alone bow so that they can function normally.
Who must go?
Blame it to the west
He joins Bush with his dog paintings visiting ALL the late night talk shows in the US . Now Bush has been rebranded into Grandpa Van Gogh.
Its ashame a stray ballistic missile hasnt landed on al jazeeras head quarters.
Al Jazeera English
*Today, [Sept 13, 2023], YAHUVEH Almighty GOD says,*
[Assad] Ben-Hadad = Aram, Syria's king(PM)
“I will kindle a fire in the wall of Damascus,
And it shall consume the palaces of Ben-Hadad.”
*''Judgment on Damascus''*
Jeremiah 49: 23-27)
23] “Hamath and Arpad are shamed,
For they have heard bad news.
They are fainthearted;
There is trouble on the sea; It cannot be quiet.
24] Damascus has grown feeble;
She turns to flee, And fear has seized her.
Anguish and sorrows have taken her like a woman in [b]labor.
25] Why is the city of praise not deserted, the city of My joy?
26] Therefore her young men shall fall in her streets,
And all the men of war shall be cut off in that day,” says the Lord of hosts.
27] “I will kindle a fire in the wall of Damascus,
*And it shall consume the palaces of Ben-Hadad.”*
***************************************
*Who was Ben-Hadad in the Bible?*
[ANSWER] Ben-Hadad seems to have been the title of the reigning king of Aram (Syria).
Ben-Hadad means “son of Hadad.” Hadad or Adad was the god of storm and thunder, and, as was common in that epoch of history, kings were seen as sons of the primary god of the region.
In the Bible, Ben-Hadad, the king of Aram, is mentioned in 1 Kings 15:18-22; throughout
1 Kings 20; 2 Kings 6:24; 8:9; 13:24-25; 2Chronicles 16:2-4; Jeremiah 49:27; and Amos 1:4. *Since Ben-Hadad is a title much like Pharaoh or President, the term can refer to different* individuals at different times. The context of each passage must be studied to determine just who is involved. Most students of history accept the existence of three Ben-Hadads who ruled in Damascus: Ben-Hadad I, who ruled c. 900-860 BC; his son (or grandson) Ben-Hadad II, who ruled 860-841; and another, unrelated Ben-Hadad, the son of the man who assassinated Ben-Hadad II.
In 1 Kings 15:18,
Ben-Hadad is designated as the son of Tabrimmon, the son of Hezion. In this passage, King Asa of Judah makes a treaty with Ben-Hadad to help protect himself against the king of Israel, who was threatening Judah. (This is also recorded in 2 Chronicles 16:2-4.) Ben-Hadad sent soldiers against Israel and King Baasha and conquered a number of towns, bringing some relief to Judah.
In 1 Kings 20,
Ben-Hadad once again attacks the northern kingdom of Israel, where Ahab is now the king. It is possible that this is the same Ben-Hadad who attacked in 1 Kings 15, or it could be a son, Ben-Hadad II. It seems that this time Ben-Hadad is attacking on his own without consideration for any treaty with Judah. And this time, although he had 32 kings helping him (1 Kings 20:1), he is defeated by King Ahab and the army of Israel. About three years later, Israel and Syria renew their conflict, leading to Ahab’s final battle and death (1 Kings 22).
In 2 Kings 6-7,
about nine years after Ahab’s death,
Ben-Hadad II invades Israel and lays siege to Samaria, the capital. The siege went on for so long that the people in the city were starving to death. However, in the middle of the night, the Lord caused the Aramean army to hear sounds of an advancing army. Thinking the king of Israel was receiving help from foreign nations, all of Ben-Hadad’s men fled, leaving everything behind.
In 2 Kings 8,
the prophet Elisha travels to Damascus and relays a paradoxical prophecy to Ben-Hadad II,
who was ill: “Go and say to him, ‘You will certainly recover.’ Nevertheless, the Lord has revealed to me that he will in fact die” (verse 10). Just as Elisha said, Ben-Hadad began to recover from his illness, but then a man named Hazael murdered Ben-Hadad and took the throne of Aram. In 2 Kings 13, Hazael is succeeded by his son, who is also named Ben-Hadad. This final Ben-Hadad was defeated three times by king Jehoash of Israel, fulfilling another prophecy of Elisha (2 Kings 13:1-25).
In Jeremiah 49:27,
the Word of YAHUVEH [LORD GOD] says,
*“I will set fire to the walls of Damascus; it will consume the fortresses of Ben-Hadad.”*
At the time of Jeremiah’s prophecy, none of the Ben-Hadads mentioned above would have been alive. The reference may be to the current king of Aram or perhaps to a fortress that had been built by and now bore the name of a former king.
*In Amos 1:4 we have a similar prophecy: “I will send fire on the house of Hazael that will* consume the fortresses of Ben-Hadad.” By this time, the original Ben-Hadad had been killed, and Hazael was king. As above, “the fortress of Ben-Hadad” could simply refer to a fortress of the current king [ president ] or to a specific fortress that was known by that name.
*In summary, Ben-Hadad is the title of the Aramean king, “son of Hadad,” a prominent deity in* the region. Several kings of Aram had extensive interaction with the kingdom of Israel and attacked several times. The Lord God YAHUVEH used Ben-Hadad and the Arameans to bring judgment on rebellious Israel, but *YAH punished Aram[Syria] for her evil, as well.
Shame on you Aljazeera for what you did to syria
Forget about war crimes money and power more important in corrupted world
The same way the people of USA and UK want us to forget about their war crimes in Libya and Iraq.
Well explained. Thank you
Not at all, it’s biased against Syria
Who supported the resistance
Talking about crime against humanity...... We all know where to point our finger at. The left side of the compass is the sources of all atrocities on this planet.
He is not a Muslim.
But you are Khawarij
Manufacturing consent
I knew Ted Lasso would turn out to be the bad guy.
Jesus Christ is Lord
IC XC 📿🕯☦️🕯NIKA
Qatar loosing its temper, qatar backed salafist have to step back
dictatorships shouldn't be treated as normal democratic countries.
Evil
Not to mention the safety of Lebanese people. Syria constantly claims that Lebanon is their territory and not a separate state.
That's not true. Is there a source for that?
Syrian regime, we don’t want Lebanon we just want freedom
Western seen him bad person! But he saved his country not collapse as Somalia and Yeman. If Somali well developed sites every sectors compared the rest of African country in short period holding the power dictator had not infiltrated western in the civil war, somalia might survived as Syria and somalia wouldn't ended place people sees enemy each other.
wondering how the west is hurt the most when the arab land tries to becomes peaceful, its unfortunate
WHO THE BRITISH LIKE PROSPER ENGLISH IS THE MOST LIFE GIVING LANGUAGE ON EARTH THE CHRIST AND LIKE KINGS FROM FAR AWAY
7:34 Assad is writing the narrative and your "emotional cry" isn't...sorry
When Al Jazeera invites CNN correspondent for comments, you know then they are telling lies😂😂😂
Assad might be thinking of introducing an Eastern world court for crimes against humanity....
This is why Arab world is what it is... tribalism to rationalise monarchical puppetry..😢
Western propaganda 😂
Qatari*