The arc looks like a really solid card but the drivers still need more work. I salute all the guys beta testing it, I feel like it'll evolve like the RX 5700 XT and it'll only get better. Though if I had to pick...In France, in term of price quality/perf the RX 6650 XT is a nobrainer when the two others are 100€ higher in price.
Can you give an example on how Arc drivers still need work? As far as playing games go they are solid. Cyberpunk High 1440 I am getting 96fps average, Last of Us high settings getting 70-80 fps also at 1440. Here in the USA the 16gb LE model is a great value for only $350.
@@danielchettiar5670 What older game though? I'm just curious. As I genuinely have not experienced such issues, though my gaming library does mainly consist of DX11 and newer titles I still have some older ones that work great. Like The Darkness II, which I have even played at 5120x1440 32:9 ultrawide on my A770. Also tried with FFXI and that's DX8 (not ultrawide though), but it ran just as good if not better than the GTX 970 I upgraded from. It should be noted Intel releases driver updates 2-3 times a month they are improving performance all the time. Arc is in a very good position currently.
@@AncientGameplays But Arc has native DX11 support. You would have to play something older like DX10-DX8 for Arc to rely on software layer to convert calls. Performance has been addressed for many DX11 titles and as I already mentioned, Darkness II DX9 works great, Final Fantasy XI which DX8 works great, so most mainstream titles should work fine. While I understand there might still be some outliers out there, like a couple of the Assassin Creed titles, it would be VERY interesting if you could do a video about older games, as I think present day Arc would perform much better than it has previously. You have a lot of great content and I subbed. Thank you for this video.
To me it seems like the A770 was originally supposed to compete with the RX 6700XT/ RTX3070 but they realized that the performance wasn't there with the drivers. Tom Peterson from Intel said the ARC architecture was made for 1440p or higher. I think they decided to set it against the 3060 directly to try to make it look good.
I bought the RX 6650 XT and I'm very happy with the decision. However, Intel may become a good choice once they sort out their drivers. Let's hope they will continue to work on it.
Bet arc a750 will become the next rx570 and a770 next rx580. They're so similar, same guy worked on them, basically the same power draw, same memory bus, same bad performance on launch which is then getting boosted with every driver release
@@gejamugamlatsoomanam7716 You tellin' someone to upgrade from 6650XT to 3060Ti/3070 ? What kind of a special creature you are ? Both come with more price same amount of VRAM , in fact 3070 is ultra overpriced costing nearly 2x that of 6650XT.
I can't believe I actually want Intel to do well. But having them competitive in the GPU market might actually help bring prices down. If the drivers continue to improve I may even consider buying one in the future.
@@Decenium I thought GN was tech Jesus? 🤔 maybe he could still use the hardware Jesus monaker. but then, who's the software Jesus? 🤔 also I think we should have a tech Buddha.
So Intel is better at Ray Tracing. Nvidia better be careful.... once Intel reaches the same rasterised performance as Nvidia's top end cards...Intel would easily beat them or at least match them.
I can only Imagine, if the Arc Cards were Launched like this, they'd have a lot better market share now...Really Impressive for a first Generation Product. I am looking forward to the next outing from Intel on the GPU Market.
You need to consider they are all low end cards but require resizable bar that most users couldn’t even enable when this launched. They were screwed from the start but ate the cost. It should work out just fine in the long term assuming they can keep going.
intel already has a big market share and they are pioneers in processing so no surprise they could make a gpu from their sheer involvement a market that has amd and nvidia in it, they are also fast learners, only thing holding them back in the cpu department is greed a bit, but amd forces them to innovate
@damara2268 I was so happy when I found this out! I have an i9-9900k and I was excited when I found out I didn't even have to upgrade. I wonder why they say ReBAR is only compatible on 10th gen?
Great video ! You are the only one showing 4k on these a770 With that much raw power and vram the a770 is a solid choice for high res "low" fps gaming, pretty futur proof, i already had nvidia ( a lot of nvidia) and few AMD cards ( good power but Bad driver when launch) I think i'm gonna give a try for Intel, maybe not the fastest but being a tech enthousiast make me wanna try and see by myself
Intel's frame graphs have always been fun to watch at least 😂 Thank you for being one of the only reviewers that actually addresses this horrible issue!
Perfect timing, everything you do is fantastic. I'm considering picking up a Bifrost A770 16GB instead of a 6700XT so I can also test and use an Intel GPU on my channel. It'll go in my wife's PC for day to day as she doesn't play everyday and it'll play everything she wants very easily while being able to max out textures and other VRAM intensive processes. Plus, AV1 encoding will be handy.
@@pk417 it's a business write off for me and I already have a ton of different GPU's. I was going to buy a 6700/50 XT to test longevity against a 6600XT, 3060 Ti and a 3070, but the fact I could get an A770 for a similar price with 16GB makes more sense from a content perspective. It's certainly not being bought to be used everyday as a primary GPU by any stretch... That might be Battle Mage though.
I would choose 3060 over 6650xt coz of vram Even over 3070 coz of vram Bloody nvidia screwing people with vram I think 6650xt should have had 12gb vram
Well done Fabio. Your videos are getting better and better. Informative, but approaching the entertainment value of "Dawid Does Tech Stuff", you are both hilarious and would make for an entertaining collab.
If Arc A770 didn't have hade so many stuttering problems, and if it had pretty much on par with AMD software stability, I would've wanted one. But right now, my only choice is 6700 xt (why? because it is similarly priced with RTX 3060 and A770 16GB).
Early gang, been using RX 6650 XT for like almost half a year no complain so far, decent temps, great price to performance, but 8 Gigs of VRAM sometimes not enough that's all
I have the a770 16gb, I was able to get on a deal for $310 with some free games as well. Been good so far. Few quirks but mostly on games that have quirks with most GPUs like Gotham Knights that kept crashing. Ironic that it was a free game I got with the card.
Felicitaciones bro por el crecimiento de tu canal! Te sigo desde que tenia la 5700xt hace unos años y increible ver con mis propios ojos que ahora recibes tarjetas! Que alegre la verdad! Haber cuando unas partidas de pubg jaja
Among the 3 , Arc 770 16gb is the obvious choice, drivers are getting better with every update and it is future proof with 16gb vram, all 8gb and even 10gb are DOA in most future games.and even some new games that are out today, also 1080p at some point needs to disappear, 1440p high fps or ultrawide is the best choice.
I might look at getting like an arc as my first graphics card , like its has good vram , the 1080-1440p performance in really good specially at the price in Europe , not to mention that the rt performance is pretty good for creative work , and i could get a i9 13900k with it and upgrade the graphics card later if necessary (and if the next gen is not bad as this one /or intel breaks the card beyond repair)
I would buy 6650xt , is 280 dollars in Romania, 6700xt is 400 dollars, 3060 the same or a little more expensive actually, arc is the same as it, and 5600g is 120 dollars. Actually for a " gypsye " with no future or chance to a better life like myself, it's hard to look after expensive stuff. The 6750xt is my Whole sallary on an entire month of Hard work. Also I need a mobo, cpu(/cooler) , case, storage, memory, it adds up to 1000 dollars. its sad that absolutely no monitor is looking good and I feel bad I cannot afford to play on LG C2 oled, I cant afford it and I cant afford a PC that plays on it... Keep us in touch with Radeon 7600 and Pheonix and Strix points, they are gonna be budget friendly, okay? Great work my man, you are always awesome, and if I said this, then this is true.
It's another video, where you use Gb instead of GB - bits and Bytes matter :) Especially when you use correct B when describing cache in MB. Otherwise I like your benchmarks and am grateful for all the hard work you do when testing so many games.
Great card but two years too late. Could you imagine this card was released two years ago? And the price Intel could charge for it? The same may go with the Battlemage as this card could be great right now but in two years it will compete with the Nvidia 50xx and the RDNA 4. Conclusion: Intel is one generation out of schedule and that's why most probably they fired Raja.
Fabio, whats up brother. Sending lots of love. Can you link or recommend me any source on a decent overclock on the 6750 xt ? I have the high end rog strix version. Love the new PC doctor series BTW, keep it up. You are my favourite channel when it comes to PC!
Hello My friend, thanks for watching and for donating! well, I believe you could follow my 6700XT tutorial and simply raise the values and voltages, the steps are the same :D
Bom video Fabio, quem diria a intel a dar cartas mas os drivers ainda não estão no ponto como jogo alguns jogos antigos na me cheira estava a pensar investir numa 6600XT só jogo a 1080p não tinha visto 6650XT em preço compensa mais esta. olha uma pergunta a minha board é pcie3 estas gpus novas ja são todas pciex4 uma gajo perde muita performance? Neste momento tenho um 5600x posso activar aquela cena do Resizable BAR mesmo com pciex3? Abraço e bons videos.
@@AncientGameplays Nestas gpus da AMD com 128bit de memory bus axo que se perde muito pelo que tenho visto mas ninguem testa isso só o gajo do hardwareunboxed mas tinha um 5800X3D com uma 6900XT testou numa board B450(pciex3) e numa B550(pciex4) disse que perdia 4% 8% +- traduzindo perdia 4 a 5 fps em quase todos os jogos a 1080p COM SAM ligado mas tambem com um canhão destes um gajo fica naquela no meu caso cheira-me que perco muito mais, era um bom teste para tu fazeres mas com mid range hardware 5600x ou 3600x com estas 3 graficas do video em board pciex3 e pciex4. Porta-te bem
I am curious if AMD will have 16gb variant for example. And prices, surely they'll make 60 class affordable after seeing how Nvidia's 80 and 70 class having poor sales, though maybe i'm just hoping
3070 performance at 399 8gb vram don't buy 7600xt probably have 12gb vram and 3060ti performance with even lower price than 6600xt Wait till n33 don't rush for 4060 which will age bad Don't buy a meme gpu
What model of the 6650xt are you using, with 176wTdp? Because my MSI Mech 2x is locked to 150w and performs pretty much the same (sometimes little better) as in your benchmarks 🤔
@@AncientGameplays You're right, it's probably game settings 😅 as I hate motion blur for example its the first thing I turn off in every game. But for the TDP - I assume you overclock in Afterburner? Cause in Adrenalin I can't move the power slider obove 150w even in OC mode?
The intel card has a lot of extra potential which needs to be untapped, and it looks as though Intel is working towards that. The RT performance means it is more future proof than either other card. Hard call, either the AMD or the Intel is my pick.
Bruh, the Arc A770 seems like it doesn't function well without the ReBar and it's worthless without it. Wow. Thanks for the wonderful video and your efforts!
Intel Arc Marketing materials list re-bar as mandatory for using Intel Arc GPU so it's obvious that it doesn't work well without it because it was designed to work with re-bar
Fabio, suggestion for a video. You could make a video comparing your 7700x to a 7600x, adjust to the same MHz, to see, how big the benefit of 8 cores over 6 cores. As you do have a selection of GPUs already there. Maybe a 6900xt and a 6650xt
@@AncientGameplays ah, even better then! So much talk all over UA-cam about how "important 8cores are for the newer games" vs. "6cores are all you really need". A scaling video of a lower end card and a higher end card would be superb.
Vram usage means absolutely nothing, because they manage RAM differently, the temperatures have to do with the card model mostly, the only thing I agree with is drivers and power draw
Tnx now i know my 6800m laptop can beat all of these cards im inbetween a 6650 XT and a 6700 XT in perfromance , bought it back in 2021 guess those 12 GB of Vram do make a difference even if is a laptop specially at higher resolution, back then i almost got a 3060 laptop but changed my minds in the last moment.
@@AncientGameplays Yes but with lower Wattage im using 140-160 W, i think AMD tried getting as close to 6700XT they could while keeping power 30 to 40 percent lower so in some games i am matching the 6700XT while in other games im slower by 10-15 percent but it's a fair tradeoff considering even with lower frames in some games im still using less watts per frame then the 6700XT here are some benchmarks from Hardware unboxed ua-cam.com/video/0AOVWCnJYuo/v-deo.html&ab_channel=HardwareUnboxed it's really interesting what amd pulled off then, i actually managed to get the G17 advantage in Europe.
Didn’t know the a770 has much more L2 cache while the 6650xt is the only one with L3 cache. I’m stuck on a 3060 since the a770 didn’t exist when I got it last year and the 6650xt wasn’t released yet. The 6600xt was also slightly more expensive at the time and the 6700xt was more than $200 higher. If it was today I would get the 6750xt for roughly the same money
It is surprising how good the A770 is, the only games I See doing better on the nvidia side than both the amd and intel also are heavily dependant on Nvidia's api toolset on doing research. THe only issue I might have with all of these cards is the linux driver support as I duo boot with linux.
Bad as this looks for the ARC right now, it still shows in future generations if intel gets the s*** together it can be real competitor for AMD and NVIDIA which is good for us, the consumer.
Fabio, there is an overlay of parameters available in Adrenalin. It includes not only MHz, T°, RPM, W, but also V, A, %, RAM, CPU currents etc. How can it be edited to remove unnecessary parameters?
As it stands, "voices" tell that the upcoming RX7600 is (at the moment) about 11% faster then an RX6650XT and like that, only has 8GB of Vram., at which point I'd go straight to the RX6700. If the drivers could become more consistent, the ARC770 16gb is a pretty alluring card for the prices it can be picked. As I'm mostly playing Star Citizen, which is always evolving, may be ARC is not the safest bet for the engine being tested, so it might not be for me. I would stay clear of anything with less then 12GB anyway, which is barely enough for 1080p today, and worse in the future.
IDK how prices are in Italy (doubt they're much different), but over here RX 6650 XT is by far the cheapest, being noticeably cheaper than both 3060 and the 8GB A770... while being much much cheaper than the so-called Limited Edition 16GB version of it. With the money the 16GB LE version (or worse, the ASUS BiFrost one) costs, I can buy a RX 6750 XT, 3060 Ti, or put some more to it and get the RX 6800. And neither of these much better options lock you into 2019+ systems that need to have ReBAR/SAM either. Some power consumption numbers would have been nice, tho I know overlay/software numbers aren't the most reliable.
I just picked up a 6650 XT for $220. Well, it was actually $280, but it came with a coupon code for The Last of Us: Part (the good) 1, which is still $60 on Steam.
I upgraded from an RX 480 to a RX 6650 XT earlier this year, the RX 480 was more stable, I have had nothing but issues since the install. It runs cooler than the 480 but all sorts of issues since install. In MS 365 Outlook, the message preview will go blank, I have to move to a different email message then back to try and view it, if I double click to full screen on the message no issues,.. Then if I stream off same sites been using for years and play solitaire at the same time, the system seems laggy, one or the other will slow or lock up. A 2019 custom build with Gig 390 pro board, 16g RAM, i5-9600k on liquid, 2 M.2 drives. Now more BS may be trying to get on my PC off these streaming sites, but I am protected. Now I did the edit to stop Windows from upgrading on its own and running the latest approved AMD drivers, but since day 1 issues, and even tried cleaning all former and fresh no joy.. so drivers, card, not a clue, just know I got shorted $50 from Capital One rewards buying the card so wasn't the deal I wanted...
i think RX6950XT a lil bit better than RTX 4070 ( 16 GB vram vs 12 GB + 10-12% performance increase maybe more ) and for 600 $ it is worth it waiting for tests :D
The is nothing in the 6950Xt price range atm that competes, at least with rasterization. It is just a bit power intensive and hot for some builds. ITX is a pop choice right now, I am not sure about that in and ITX.
Actually 6650xt is obviously faster than 3060. 6600xt is a candidate for comparing with 3060. So, intel card is still sucking) it is too raw to be a competitor to AMD and Nvidia.
Solid for 1080p RT and xess on when playing with newer titles Fsr2 looks good aswell Im buying this a770 16gb if it's $199 just to say F U to 4060ti/7600 launch
I had 6600xt nitro+ 3060ti strix oc and now I have a770le The way I see it is 3060ti smooth but expensive and big but not future proof 6600xt underperforming at higher resolutions but cheap a770le amazing and I have it since the release, it has the best colors as nvidia was washed out but at the expense of the favorite titles you play, aka dx9 is a no go You have to pick the card that is suited for the games you want to use it for and if so then hands down a770le is the winner in my book. I would wait for the next gen in the case I own any of these
I have an A770 and I can also confirm the out the box colors looks better than my RTX 3070ti in every game tested except cyberpunk. BTW you are the second person thats mention the colors using Arc. I hope more people take notice. Call me crazy but I think in time the A770 will be about as good as the rtx 3070... my theory is based on emulators comparisons, linux testing, and other apps. The only issue I see is if you try to oc the card it becomes unstable. Other than that every driver has given better compatability and hidden optimizations not mentioned.
I mean, you have the 6600xt which is exactly the same but different values... I can give you this though: mega.nz/folder/4RMkkK7B#5bG2LG-NluT0DYIj3A6fCw
Used RX570/580 for 50EUR!!! Out of these 3, I would definitively consider A770, but intel is still not reliable with frame pacing. I would consider used 6650XT, but never new since I don't want to support AMD directly.
I switched recently, from my aging gtx 980ti, to the acer a770 for €350... and ive never been so amazed with a price to performance.. and everytime the drivers get updated, so far, its like geting a new card everytime. I think with time this card, or its new gen, will be on everyones wish list.... and it, and amd, also sticks it to nvidia for price gouging
@@AncientGameplays yeah I know.. tbh if I were to get a AMD, I would've spent the extra and gotten a tuf 6950 xt for €790 I saw, to really be gaming.. but honestly just wanted to see what Intel could really do(and life doesn't let me game as regularly as I used to). That and I enjoy, so far, troubleshooting to get everything out of the card. The Intel arc forums are pretty good for that
@@mrnicktoyou a770 is on the 6700 level usually, that is faster than the 5700xt that is on a 2070 super level, that is much faster than a 1080ti that is also much faster than a 980ti haha
@@mrnicktoyou i depends from game to game to be honest. (drivers still catching up) but ill use 2 games i can remember as example. cyberpunk on high no RT 980ti-55 to 60fps.. a770- 80fps (RT kills the 980, gets 60fps on a770). horizon zero dawn on high 980ti-50fps a770- 70fps (drivers are still iffy on this)... Its good for what you spend but be warned a lot of smaller dev games struggle to run with it... sons of the forest being one of those recent titles.... get 18fps on the a770 and like 60-70fps on my old card.
Rtx 3060 12gb is the best. Nvidia has best drivers, 12gb is great for 1080p, access to both fsr and dlss and ray tracing cores. Plus it has CUDA cores which work better on professional software
@@pinkgrognak lol if u don't know rtx 3060 perform same as 3070 with dlss quality So don't say 3060 can't fo rt I have 3060 myself i do rt in all the games
The 3060 12GB isn’t the best of the three in terms of cost for performance but it may last the longest with new games using more vram. It’s something to consider.
This video don't tell about compressed textures u will see during gameplay Watch hardware unbox video 3070 vs 6800 to see how textures look when u run out of vram...while still maintaining the fps
at 1080p sure but other than that it is too weak and will be 30fps soon at 1440p while a770 16Gb will be still relevant for everyone with 60hz 4k panel aka this is future proof in my book
its just insane, look a tthe specs, the A770 just craps all over the 3060....but in actual gameplay?,... man drivers and developer contact is one hell of a thing
Intel drivers will improve with time. The main conclusion from this video is Nvidia is losing ground by beeing greedy. Seems like AMD has the least overhead in terms of driver architecture while also having that very small cache wich impacts performance at 4k. The ARC 770 in terms of specs and power consumption seems to be 1 tier higher than the other two but the price is right so nothing to complain about. AMD seems the best choice for now at least
Is it necessary to test Intel Alchemist cards without ReBAR, when even Intel points out that this setting is basically a system requirement? I know that this card technically works without it, but it shouldn't be used in systems that are not supporting ReBAR, because performance always goes to shit, just like your benchmarks perfectly shows. Less work for you :)
@@AncientGameplays Technically you are right. But it would be better to just advise not even looking on Intel offering without the ReBAR available on the system. But you do you, it's still very informative to see how just one setting that gives AMD and NVIDIA 2-5% performance bump can be 100% or even more for Intel ARC :)
Which card would you get for yourself and why? RTX 3060, Arc A770 or RX 6650XT?
RX 6650XT, budget friendly in where I live, it has good performance and still future proof as I mostly game on 1080p and sometimes 1440p.
i already got the rx 6650 xt for my first pc build ever, no problem so far, but sometimes 8 gigs of vram kinda not enough
Have the a770 LE quite happy with it
@@malavpatel77 in here a770 is pretty pricey thats why i picked 6650 xt, intel gpu's in where i live is not that popular so the demand is very low
1080p = 6650xt are the best fps u get for money
If Intel's drivers keep improving over time like AMD's do, the A770 16gb will age like wine.
agreed. game engine need to get updated as well
The arc looks like a really solid card but the drivers still need more work. I salute all the guys beta testing it, I feel like it'll evolve like the RX 5700 XT and it'll only get better. Though if I had to pick...In France, in term of price quality/perf the RX 6650 XT is a nobrainer when the two others are 100€ higher in price.
Can you give an example on how Arc drivers still need work? As far as playing games go they are solid. Cyberpunk High 1440 I am getting 96fps average, Last of Us high settings getting 70-80 fps also at 1440. Here in the USA the 16gb LE model is a great value for only $350.
@@gamesushi In older games it's very spotty. Like dx 9. Important to some people
@@danielchettiar5670 What older game though? I'm just curious. As I genuinely have not experienced such issues, though my gaming library does mainly consist of DX11 and newer titles I still have some older ones that work great. Like The Darkness II, which I have even played at 5120x1440 32:9 ultrawide on my A770. Also tried with FFXI and that's DX8 (not ultrawide though), but it ran just as good if not better than the GTX 970 I upgraded from. It should be noted Intel releases driver updates 2-3 times a month they are improving performance all the time. Arc is in a very good position currently.
@@gamesushi anything using DX11 and below usually runs bad
@@AncientGameplays But Arc has native DX11 support. You would have to play something older like DX10-DX8 for Arc to rely on software layer to convert calls. Performance has been addressed for many DX11 titles and as I already mentioned, Darkness II DX9 works great, Final Fantasy XI which DX8 works great, so most mainstream titles should work fine. While I understand there might still be some outliers out there, like a couple of the Assassin Creed titles, it would be VERY interesting if you could do a video about older games, as I think present day Arc would perform much better than it has previously. You have a lot of great content and I subbed. Thank you for this video.
To me it seems like the A770 was originally supposed to compete with the RX 6700XT/ RTX3070 but they realized that the performance wasn't there with the drivers. Tom Peterson from Intel said the ARC architecture was made for 1440p or higher. I think they decided to set it against the 3060 directly to try to make it look good.
Exactly
@@AncientGameplays so there are still improvements to be made?
I bought the RX 6650 XT and I'm very happy with the decision. However, Intel may become a good choice once they sort out their drivers. Let's hope they will continue to work on it.
Bet arc a750 will become the next rx570 and a770 next rx580.
They're so similar, same guy worked on them, basically the same power draw, same memory bus, same bad performance on launch which is then getting boosted with every driver release
Better upgrade to 3060ti or 3070
@@gejamugamlatsoomanam7716 You tellin' someone to upgrade from 6650XT to 3060Ti/3070 ? What kind of a special creature you are ? Both come with more price same amount of VRAM , in fact 3070 is ultra overpriced costing nearly 2x that of 6650XT.
@@damara2268 RX 580 is still the budget king somehow.
@@gejamugamlatsoomanam7716 3060ti not the best choise, very hot and risky card
6650XT is a better GPU than we gave it credit for
true
Yeah, it launched for 380$ which was pathetic, but the new prices and improved drivers make it a great value for 1080p.
I can't believe I actually want Intel to do well. But having them competitive in the GPU market might actually help bring prices down. If the drivers continue to improve I may even consider buying one in the future.
HARDWARE JESUS UPLOADED OMG
Gamer's Nexus's Steven Burk is hardware jesus already, AG needs a different nickname
@@Decenium I thought GN was tech Jesus? 🤔
maybe he could still use the hardware Jesus monaker.
but then, who's the software Jesus? 🤔
also I think we should have a tech Buddha.
No es Jesús, ni GN
y cómo que omg
habla bien
@@Decenium no es y tampoco es Jesucristo
habla bien
@@admiralbosch2851 no es y tampoco es Jesucristo
habla bien
So Intel is better at Ray Tracing. Nvidia better be careful.... once Intel reaches the same rasterised performance as Nvidia's top end cards...Intel would easily beat them or at least match them.
I can only Imagine, if the Arc Cards were Launched like this, they'd have a lot better market share now...Really Impressive for a first Generation Product. I am looking forward to the next outing from Intel on the GPU Market.
Well, I wouldn't say impressive overall, but definitely impressive RT for the first gen!
You need to consider they are all low end cards but require resizable bar that most users couldn’t even enable when this launched. They were screwed from the start but ate the cost. It should work out just fine in the long term assuming they can keep going.
intel already has a big market share and they are pioneers in processing so no surprise they could make a gpu from their sheer involvement a market that has amd and nvidia in it, they are also fast learners, only thing holding them back in the cpu department is greed a bit, but amd forces them to innovate
@@quintrapnell3605 even Intel 9th gen and Ryzen 1st gen motherboards support re-bar, those are 5 year old products .
@damara2268 I was so happy when I found this out! I have an i9-9900k and I was excited when I found out I didn't even have to upgrade. I wonder why they say ReBAR is only compatible on 10th gen?
Thank you for your video! It's impressive what Intel was able to do in their first couple of months. Looking forward to Battlemage
They did improve quite a bit, but they had a bigger margin to improve since they were far behind
Great video ! You are the only one showing 4k on these a770
With that much raw power and vram the a770 is a solid choice for high res "low" fps gaming, pretty futur proof, i already had nvidia ( a lot of nvidia) and few AMD cards ( good power but Bad driver when launch)
I think i'm gonna give a try for Intel, maybe not the fastest but being a tech enthousiast make me wanna try and see by myself
Intel's frame graphs have always been fun to watch at least 😂
Thank you for being one of the only reviewers that actually addresses this horrible issue!
Thank you for being here 💪💪
Perfect timing, everything you do is fantastic. I'm considering picking up a Bifrost A770 16GB instead of a 6700XT so I can also test and use an Intel GPU on my channel. It'll go in my wife's PC for day to day as she doesn't play everyday and it'll play everything she wants very easily while being able to max out textures and other VRAM intensive processes. Plus, AV1 encoding will be handy.
That might be interesting :D
@@AncientGameplays At $350 for a 16GB VRAM GPU it'll also be a good test to see how well it ages compared to a 6600/50 XT and 3060.
@@JosMyOpinion It will definitely age better
Buy it at your own risk
It is 350 dollars not 100 dollars
At this point i would say u should wait till june for n33 so 6700xt price falls
@@pk417 it's a business write off for me and I already have a ton of different GPU's. I was going to buy a 6700/50 XT to test longevity against a 6600XT, 3060 Ti and a 3070, but the fact I could get an A770 for a similar price with 16GB makes more sense from a content perspective. It's certainly not being bought to be used everyday as a primary GPU by any stretch... That might be Battle Mage though.
AMD prices are way below Nvidia's here in Brazil, thats why I bought a RX 6700 xt
Good
0:04 "Stop it, get some help". Crying with laughter.
🤣🤣
Strangely enough, UA-cam always sends me the notification 10 minutes later for this channel.
Thank you as always for your work!
Thanks for being here! Damn youtube
This is awesome and detailed work. Love the 12 game average. Thanks
Thank you :D
Finally de game average, the only thing that was missing!
@@heldermachado8739 i've been having the averages for thr past 3 or 4 comparisons 💪
I would choose 3060 over 6650xt coz of vram
Even over 3070 coz of vram
Bloody nvidia screwing people with vram
I think 6650xt should have had 12gb vram
Yes bro thanks for the upload, i need more a770 content
Well done Fabio. Your videos are getting better and better. Informative, but approaching the entertainment value of "Dawid Does Tech Stuff", you are both hilarious and would make for an entertaining collab.
Haha, thank you!
If Arc A770 didn't have hade so many stuttering problems, and if it had pretty much on par with AMD software stability, I would've wanted one. But right now, my only choice is 6700 xt (why? because it is similarly priced with RTX 3060 and A770 16GB).
It's interesting how the ARC starts to push ahead at higher resolutions.
Higher bus width, more physical units
Thank you for your massive introductory FART 😀
🤣🤣💪
The phrase you were fishing for is "toe to toe", great comparison video BTW.
Exactly hahaha, thank you
Early gang, been using RX 6650 XT for like almost half a year no complain so far, decent temps, great price to performance, but 8 Gigs of VRAM sometimes not enough that's all
these cards are aiming at 1080P and apart from when using RT and ultra high textures, 8GB are enough, but I know what you mean
That's why u should have bought 6700xt for few extra bucks
8 gb is enough want you want 4k ... go for 24gb gpu .. 6650xt is beast for 1080p and with setting custom 1440p in medium high
I have the a770 16gb, I was able to get on a deal for $310 with some free games as well. Been good so far. Few quirks but mostly on games that have quirks with most GPUs like Gotham Knights that kept crashing. Ironic that it was a free game I got with the card.
Well, beta testers have bad times lol
The arc a770 and rx6650 are better value than the rtx3060. The 3060 did not age well.
as usual for Nvidia cards
Do you think the rx6650xt will work well with an i5-9400f or should I also upgrade the CPU?
already answered hehe
I have Ryzen 3500 with 1650super and I have CPU bottleneck in every new game. 9400f is even slower and doesn't support OC. Don't buy 6650XT for it.
still went with rx 6700 10gb and i love it!
Good GPU, underrated.
Great video!
Thanks!
thanks fo this comparison!!! like your content Fabio🥰
Thank you
Felicitaciones bro por el crecimiento de tu canal! Te sigo desde que tenia la 5700xt hace unos años y increible ver con mis propios ojos que ahora recibes tarjetas! Que alegre la verdad! Haber cuando unas partidas de pubg jaja
Gracias haha
My guy you're absolutely jacked. Keep it up.
not really haha, but thanks :D
Nice game selection more relevant than other channels
Thank you
Among the 3 , Arc 770 16gb is the obvious choice, drivers are getting better with every update and it is future proof with 16gb vram, all 8gb and even 10gb are DOA in most future games.and even some new games that are out today, also 1080p at some point needs to disappear, 1440p high fps or ultrawide is the best choice.
The 16GB version is more expensive though
@@AncientGameplays That is true, about 30€ to 70€ depending on the model of the other 2.
I might look at getting like an arc as my first graphics card , like its has good vram , the 1080-1440p performance in really good specially at the price in Europe , not to mention that the rt performance is pretty good for creative work , and i could get a i9 13900k with it and upgrade the graphics card later if necessary (and if the next gen is not bad as this one /or intel breaks the card beyond repair)
hi Fábio, love your videos! what about aliexpress used cards? do you have any experience with mining cards?
That's mostly a miss haha
I would buy 6650xt , is 280 dollars in Romania, 6700xt is 400 dollars, 3060 the same or a little more expensive actually, arc is the same as it, and 5600g is 120 dollars. Actually for a " gypsye " with no future or chance to a better life like myself, it's hard to look after expensive stuff. The 6750xt is my Whole sallary on an entire month of Hard work. Also I need a mobo, cpu(/cooler) , case, storage, memory, it adds up to 1000 dollars. its sad that absolutely no monitor is looking good and I feel bad I cannot afford to play on LG C2 oled, I cant afford it and I cant afford a PC that plays on it... Keep us in touch with Radeon 7600 and Pheonix and Strix points, they are gonna be budget friendly, okay? Great work my man, you are always awesome, and if I said this, then this is true.
Thank you 💪💪
I feel pretty good about my Arc 770 8gb purchase 6 months ago for $249
I have a more recent video than this one I believe, ARC software has been getting better overall
Classic nGreedia offers a more expensive gpu for less performance.
It's another video, where you use Gb instead of GB - bits and Bytes matter :) Especially when you use correct B when describing cache in MB.
Otherwise I like your benchmarks and am grateful for all the hard work you do when testing so many games.
Its a typo, my bad haha
Face off against, head to head, versus, comparatively
They optimizing all games 1 by 1 lmao, Intel has a long way to run then
Its more like game engine by game engine
I want to build my pc for gaming and editing
So in this case which gpu should i choose?
3060 12gb or Arc770 with 5600x
Well, you have the results here... i would just pick a 6700xt
Great card but two years too late. Could you imagine this card was released two years ago? And the price Intel could charge for it?
The same may go with the Battlemage as this card could be great right now but in two years it will compete with the Nvidia 50xx and the RDNA 4.
Conclusion: Intel is one generation out of schedule and that's why most probably they fired Raja.
Fabio, whats up brother. Sending lots of love. Can you link or recommend me any source on a decent overclock on the 6750 xt ? I have the high end rog strix version. Love the new PC doctor series BTW, keep it up. You are my favourite channel when it comes to PC!
Hello My friend, thanks for watching and for donating!
well, I believe you could follow my 6700XT tutorial and simply raise the values and voltages, the steps are the same :D
@@AncientGameplays Thanks my bro
this video is made with HYPE!!!!
now! im hyped!!!!!
hehehe
Bom video Fabio, quem diria a intel a dar cartas mas os drivers ainda não estão no ponto como jogo alguns jogos antigos na me cheira estava a pensar investir numa 6600XT só jogo a 1080p não tinha visto 6650XT em preço compensa mais esta.
olha uma pergunta a minha board é pcie3 estas gpus novas ja são todas pciex4 uma gajo perde muita performance?
Neste momento tenho um 5600x posso activar aquela cena do Resizable BAR mesmo com pciex3?
Abraço e bons videos.
Viva, podes ativar o SAM com PCIe 3, mas com perdes um bocado nestas placas com PCIe3 sendo que elas têm apenas x8 lanes em vez de x16
@@AncientGameplays Nestas gpus da AMD com 128bit de memory bus axo que se perde muito pelo que tenho visto mas ninguem testa isso só o gajo do hardwareunboxed mas tinha um 5800X3D com uma 6900XT testou numa board B450(pciex3) e numa B550(pciex4) disse que perdia 4% 8% +- traduzindo perdia 4 a 5 fps em quase todos os jogos a 1080p COM SAM ligado mas tambem com um canhão destes um gajo fica naquela no meu caso cheira-me que perco muito mais, era um bom teste para tu fazeres mas com mid range hardware 5600x ou 3600x com estas 3 graficas do video em board pciex3 e pciex4.
Porta-te bem
What? The Intel is about to take the "Fine Wine" term to a new level. Thanks for the video.
Thanks for watching
Thanks for that, curious to see what 7600 and 4060 will be able to do soon
Indeed
6750XT performance for under $300, 8 gig vram tho unfortunately
7600XT will be between 6700XT and 6750XT and will have 8gb..
I am curious if AMD will have 16gb variant for example. And prices, surely they'll make 60 class affordable after seeing how Nvidia's 80 and 70 class having poor sales, though maybe i'm just hoping
3070 performance at 399
8gb vram don't buy
7600xt probably have 12gb vram and 3060ti performance with even lower price than 6600xt
Wait till n33 don't rush for 4060 which will age bad
Don't buy a meme gpu
1:43 Lol. 🤑
Navi 23 Transistors 11,060 million vs DG2-512 Transistors 21,700 million.
Intel's efficiency anyone?
What model of the 6650xt are you using, with 176wTdp? Because my MSI Mech 2x is locked to 150w and performs pretty much the same (sometimes little better) as in your benchmarks 🤔
Its overclocked as seen my friend, also, i doubt it performs better in the same exact scenarios and settings
@@AncientGameplays You're right, it's probably game settings 😅 as I hate motion blur for example its the first thing I turn off in every game.
But for the TDP - I assume you overclock in Afterburner?
Cause in Adrenalin I can't move the power slider obove 150w even in OC mode?
the A770, on paper, beats the 3070, I think the drivers really hold it back
Not just that, the design is different and inneficient in some aspects
@@AncientGameplays true, but I think it's better than anyone would've expected for Intels first cards
The intel card has a lot of extra potential which needs to be untapped, and it looks as though Intel is working towards that. The RT performance means it is more future proof than either other card. Hard call, either the AMD or the Intel is my pick.
Bruh, the Arc A770 seems like it doesn't function well without the ReBar and it's worthless without it. Wow. Thanks for the wonderful video and your efforts!
In some games yeah, thanks for watching :D
To be fair, the ARC cards list ReBar as a requirement for the GPU.
Intel Arc Marketing materials list re-bar as mandatory for using Intel Arc GPU so it's obvious that it doesn't work well without it because it was designed to work with re-bar
@@damara2268 I had no idea about that, really. Thanks for clarifying.
@@Caution40404 yeah literally says it on the box you buy it in
Thank You!
Thank you as well!
The ray tracing performance being better than nvidia is a pleasant surprise. Intel will have the best GPUs in no time if they keep this up.
Fabio, suggestion for a video. You could make a video comparing your 7700x to a 7600x, adjust to the same MHz, to see, how big the benefit of 8 cores over 6 cores. As you do have a selection of GPUs already there. Maybe a 6900xt and a 6650xt
For that i could simply disable cores on the 7700x haha
@@AncientGameplays ah, even better then! So much talk all over UA-cam about how "important 8cores are for the newer games" vs. "6cores are all you really need". A scaling video of a lower end card and a higher end card would be superb.
0:02 Yisus Ki Max
intel is improving really fast , i hope rumors that after gen or two they will stop making gpus is not true
of course they aren't and Intel already stated that. That would be scrapping millions, if not billions of dollars
glad to hear
The ARC cards still aren't there yet. Look at the power consumption and the weird VRAM usage. Not to mention high temps.
Vram usage means absolutely nothing, because they manage RAM differently, the temperatures have to do with the card model mostly, the only thing I agree with is drivers and power draw
Sir, Which one in better?
1.Gigabyte RTX 3060 Windforce OC 12GB
2.GUNNIR INTEL ARC A770 PHOTON 16G OC GRAPHICS CARD
Yeah, watch the video my friend
Tnx now i know my 6800m laptop can beat all of these cards im inbetween a 6650 XT and a 6700 XT in perfromance , bought it back in 2021 guess those 12 GB of Vram do make a difference even if is a laptop specially at higher resolution, back then i almost got a 3060 laptop but changed my minds in the last moment.
well, the 6800m is a 6700XT desktop
@@AncientGameplays Yes but with lower Wattage im using 140-160 W, i think AMD tried getting as close to 6700XT they could while keeping power 30 to 40 percent lower so in some games i am matching the 6700XT while in other games im slower by 10-15 percent but it's a fair tradeoff considering even with lower frames in some games im still using less watts per frame then the 6700XT here are some benchmarks from Hardware unboxed ua-cam.com/video/0AOVWCnJYuo/v-deo.html&ab_channel=HardwareUnboxed it's really interesting what amd pulled off then, i actually managed to get the G17 advantage in Europe.
Theoretically a770 should perform godly compared to the other two carda
Not really, because the arc may not scale that well, as it happens with some AMD cards like the FURY and the VEGA ones
Didn’t know the a770 has much more L2 cache while the 6650xt is the only one with L3 cache.
I’m stuck on a 3060 since the a770 didn’t exist when I got it last year and the 6650xt wasn’t released yet. The 6600xt was also slightly more expensive at the time and the 6700xt was more than $200 higher. If it was today I would get the 6750xt for roughly the same money
Now you do haha 💪
It is surprising how good the A770 is, the only games I See doing better on the nvidia side than both the amd and intel also are heavily dependant on Nvidia's api toolset on doing research. THe only issue I might have with all of these cards is the linux driver support as I duo boot with linux.
Yeah, the AMD cards actually have excelent linux drivers with MESA
Great work as always, by any chance, you use 4311 driver for Intel? They just dropped 4314, again 😂
I did, but even for these games the new drivers made little difference
Bad as this looks for the ARC right now, it still shows in future generations if intel gets the s*** together it can be real competitor for AMD and NVIDIA which is good for us, the consumer.
they are improving really fast for their first gpu generation, if they continue like this, they will be really good option
Fabio, there is an overlay of parameters available in Adrenalin. It includes not only MHz, T°, RPM, W, but also V, A, %, RAM, CPU currents etc. How can it be edited to remove unnecessary parameters?
You have the options to pick the ones you want in the performance tab
As it stands, "voices" tell that the upcoming RX7600 is (at the moment) about 11% faster then an RX6650XT and like that, only has 8GB of Vram., at which point I'd go straight to the RX6700. If the drivers could become more consistent, the ARC770 16gb is a pretty alluring card for the prices it can be picked. As I'm mostly playing Star Citizen, which is always evolving, may be ARC is not the safest bet for the engine being tested, so it might not be for me.
I would stay clear of anything with less then 12GB anyway, which is barely enough for 1080p today, and worse in the future.
We need to wait and see, perf, power draw and so on
IDK how prices are in Italy (doubt they're much different), but over here RX 6650 XT is by far the cheapest, being noticeably cheaper than both 3060 and the 8GB A770... while being much much cheaper than the so-called Limited Edition 16GB version of it.
With the money the 16GB LE version (or worse, the ASUS BiFrost one) costs, I can buy a RX 6750 XT, 3060 Ti, or put some more to it and get the RX 6800. And neither of these much better options lock you into 2019+ systems that need to have ReBAR/SAM either.
Some power consumption numbers would have been nice, tho I know overlay/software numbers aren't the most reliable.
I do talk about the prices in the beginning and the end, for both Europe and US. I am Portuguese btw, not Italian xD
Why does your 6650xt draw 170watts? My gpu draws 150watts max.
Overclocked there as can be seen. Also the stock power draw depends a bit on the model of your card
@@AncientGameplays i got the MSI Mech 2x, i cant Change the Power Limit. Should i be able to?
I just picked up a 6650 XT for $220. Well, it was actually $280, but it came with a coupon code for The Last of Us: Part (the good) 1, which is still $60 on Steam.
good deal
I upgraded from an RX 480 to a RX 6650 XT earlier this year, the RX 480 was more stable, I have had nothing but issues since the install. It runs cooler than the 480 but all sorts of issues since install. In MS 365 Outlook, the message preview will go blank, I have to move to a different email message then back to try and view it, if I double click to full screen on the message no issues,.. Then if I stream off same sites been using for years and play solitaire at the same time, the system seems laggy, one or the other will slow or lock up. A 2019 custom build with Gig 390 pro board, 16g RAM, i5-9600k on liquid, 2 M.2 drives. Now more BS may be trying to get on my PC off these streaming sites, but I am protected. Now I did the edit to stop Windows from upgrading on its own and running the latest approved AMD drivers, but since day 1 issues, and even tried cleaning all former and fresh no joy.. so drivers, card, not a clue, just know I got shorted $50 from Capital One rewards buying the card so wasn't the deal I wanted...
You have something wrong there for sure, some step you failed. Follow my video of how to fix all "amd problems"
i think RX6950XT a lil bit better than RTX 4070 ( 16 GB vram vs 12 GB + 10-12% performance increase maybe more ) and for 600 $ it is worth it waiting for tests :D
not a little, even the 6800XT is on par/better than the 4070 when going tweaked vs tweaked
The is nothing in the 6950Xt price range atm that competes, at least with rasterization. It is just a bit power intensive and hot for some builds. ITX is a pop choice right now, I am not sure about that in and ITX.
Thank you Jesus for the review.
I think Intel will become a good gpu brand in a few years
Actually 6650xt is obviously faster than 3060. 6600xt is a candidate for comparing with 3060.
So, intel card is still sucking) it is too raw to be a competitor to AMD and Nvidia.
Nah, even the 6600XT is usually faster. Here: ua-cam.com/video/ka-79cgY37Q/v-deo.html
Solid for 1080p RT and xess on when playing with newer titles
Fsr2 looks good aswell
Im buying this a770 16gb if it's $199 just to say F U to 4060ti/7600 launch
you have the a750 8gb at $200
@@AncientGameplays won't be that good for long tho since my brother bought his 6600 for $150
I'd like to try Intel for the right price😃
I had 6600xt nitro+ 3060ti strix oc and now I have a770le
The way I see it is 3060ti smooth but expensive and big but not future proof
6600xt underperforming at higher resolutions but cheap
a770le amazing and I have it since the release, it has the best colors as nvidia was washed out but at the expense of the favorite titles you play, aka dx9 is a no go
You have to pick the card that is suited for the games you want to use it for and if so then hands down a770le is the winner in my book.
I would wait for the next gen in the case I own any of these
Humm, amd has the best display engine, but intel one is quite good too
I have an A770 and I can also confirm the out the box colors looks better than my RTX 3070ti in every game tested except cyberpunk. BTW you are the second person thats mention the colors using Arc. I hope more people take notice. Call me crazy but I think in time the A770 will be about as good as the rtx 3070... my theory is based on emulators comparisons, linux testing, and other apps. The only issue I see is if you try to oc the card it becomes unstable. Other than that every driver has given better compatability and hidden optimizations not mentioned.
@@terrain4132 Its not only arc. Change to an AMD GPU and you can see better colors as well.
RTX 40 series are a bit better there though
You still didnt gave us a 6650xt overclock tutorial...
I mean, you have the 6600xt which is exactly the same but different values...
I can give you this though: mega.nz/folder/4RMkkK7B#5bG2LG-NluT0DYIj3A6fCw
@@AncientGameplays thank you bro, keep it up with you great content ❤️
R vs G vs B
Indeed haha
I love Mindfactory for their prices
What min/max MHz and voltage voltage do you currently run on your 7900 xtx?
Its in my oc/uv tutorial
Used RX570/580 for 50EUR!!!
Out of these 3, I would definitively consider A770, but intel is still not reliable with frame pacing. I would consider used 6650XT, but never new since I don't want to support AMD directly.
not in all games at least. Their frame pacing in most games is good, but in others it is terrible
It's interesting how much higher system temperature was with the Arc over both the other cards.
Because arc was using the stock intel cooler
I switched recently, from my aging gtx 980ti, to the acer a770 for €350... and ive never been so amazed with a price to performance.. and everytime the drivers get updated, so far, its like geting a new card everytime. I think with time this card, or its new gen, will be on everyones wish list.... and it, and amd, also sticks it to nvidia for price gouging
Great you're enjoying it, the best price perf is still the 6700xt usually though
@@AncientGameplays yeah I know.. tbh if I were to get a AMD, I would've spent the extra and gotten a tuf 6950 xt for €790 I saw, to really be gaming.. but honestly just wanted to see what Intel could really do(and life doesn't let me game as regularly as I used to). That and I enjoy, so far, troubleshooting to get everything out of the card. The Intel arc forums are pretty good for that
I have a Gtx 980ti as well. How much of an improvement to the frame rate was the A770? Like, double?
@@mrnicktoyou a770 is on the 6700 level usually, that is faster than the 5700xt that is on a 2070 super level, that is much faster than a 1080ti that is also much faster than a 980ti haha
@@mrnicktoyou i depends from game to game to be honest. (drivers still catching up) but ill use 2 games i can remember as example. cyberpunk on high no RT 980ti-55 to 60fps.. a770- 80fps (RT kills the 980, gets 60fps on a770). horizon zero dawn on high 980ti-50fps a770- 70fps (drivers are still iffy on this)...
Its good for what you spend but be warned a lot of smaller dev games struggle to run with it... sons of the forest being one of those recent titles.... get 18fps on the a770 and like 60-70fps on my old card.
Rtx 3060 12gb is the best. Nvidia has best drivers, 12gb is great for 1080p, access to both fsr and dlss and ray tracing cores. Plus it has CUDA cores which work better on professional software
You're living in the fantasy world my man, lol
@@pinkgrognak lol if u don't know rtx 3060 perform same as 3070 with dlss quality
So don't say 3060 can't fo rt
I have 3060 myself i do rt in all the games
AMD 💪 I have average 130 fps in MW2 on a 6700xt/Ryzen 7 5700g
I guess you use the arc limit edition. Use the predator befrost from Acer . You will see up to 10fps depending of the game .
Nah, I already overclocked. The only difference in the models is the limited power draw, i raised the boost a bit already 💪
The 3060 12GB isn’t the best of the three in terms of cost for performance but it may last the longest with new games using more vram. It’s something to consider.
on that case you have 16Gb on the A770, OR you simply get a 6700XT for the same price, being much faster and with 12GB as well
This video don't tell about compressed textures u will see during gameplay
Watch hardware unbox video 3070 vs 6800 to see how textures look when u run out of vram...while still maintaining the fps
at 1080p sure but other than that it is too weak and will be 30fps soon at 1440p while a770 16Gb will be still relevant for everyone with 60hz 4k panel aka this is future proof in my book
@@smudlicko well 3060 with dlss quality perform same as 3070
So depending on person whether he is okay with using dlss
If a 6700xt is close in price to 3060 12GB of course get the 6700XT
its just insane, look a tthe specs, the A770 just craps all over the 3060....but in actual gameplay?,... man drivers and developer contact is one hell of a thing
Not just that, it has to do on how the arc scales as well. Overall, look at the results
Arc is kepping better. But i will wait for he 2 generation of intel
So the best choice of them all is the 6700XT lol
So... throw out 4k and RT results as they are not worth it on any card and 6650XT is easy best overall
basically
Fabio
This video is gonna really help me narrow down my gpu purchase
I can believe it
Im getting a gpu🎉🎉
Glad to hear it! Hope you enjoy it!
@@AncientGameplays thanks
Definitely getting the rx 6700 or xt version
The A770 is meant to go against the 3060 Ti, to go against the 3060 there's the A750
Cheaper than the 3060
Intel drivers will improve with time. The main conclusion from this video is Nvidia is losing ground by beeing greedy. Seems like AMD has the least overhead in terms of driver architecture while also having that very small cache wich impacts performance at 4k. The ARC 770 in terms of specs and power consumption seems to be 1 tier higher than the other two but the price is right so nothing to complain about. AMD seems the best choice for now at least
Is it necessary to test Intel Alchemist cards without ReBAR, when even Intel points out that this setting is basically a system requirement? I know that this card technically works without it, but it shouldn't be used in systems that are not supporting ReBAR, because performance always goes to shit, just like your benchmarks perfectly shows.
Less work for you :)
It is necessary to test all cards the same way, and for people using older CPUs to know what they're going into before buying these GPUs
@@AncientGameplays Technically you are right. But it would be better to just advise not even looking on Intel offering without the ReBAR available on the system.
But you do you, it's still very informative to see how just one setting that gives AMD and NVIDIA 2-5% performance bump can be 100% or even more for Intel ARC :)