Yes they are for the battery boxes if you were still yousing the old style 3-ET batteries. I like that hidden style for the battery boxes and it keeps battery out of the way of my loader.
@@farmingforfunandprofit940 thats really cool! Idk that it would work for mine though. Not much clearance between the loader frame and tractor for a bigger one
@@radozeman That is what I was talking about. the 60 deg turn bit. Why not just say...150-170 ft lb. Are they saying we need to let the bolts "relax"... Lazy Buggers!!! LOL TBH, In all my experience, this is the first time I have ever heard of tightening a bolt 3 times and the third time adding more torque to it. Personally, I would have bypassed all of it, after doing one bolt and finding what the toque should have been in the first place. I would do the first stage, and finish it the second time over with the proper torque the second time for the remaining bolts. I won't say anything bad about JD...but I am now wondering.....
@Baron Marseille That is most likely correct, doesn't make it easier to try and figure out a 60 deg torque spec compared actual torque spec. Granted we are talking about a tractor that is like 25?? years old, and those things didn't exist at all
You forgot to put the peto for the hydraulic pump
Yes, I put that in later, wanted to get oil up to that pump first.
Tho use brackets are for the cab I bet
I don't think so, brackets for the cab are mounted by the rear of the motor and back by the 3 point
Those are the bottom battery box brackets..........
Oh ok, that would explain why there is another set on the other side.
Yes they are for the battery boxes if you were still yousing the old style 3-ET batteries. I like that hidden style for the battery boxes and it keeps battery out of the way of my loader.
@@brosso1228 I desisned my own boxes.... that use the stock mounts with group 31 batteries...... made a video to that effect
@@farmingforfunandprofit940 thats really cool! Idk that it would work for mine though. Not much clearance between the loader frame and tractor for a bigger one
Those are the weirdest torque specs I have ever seen
For the Head? Seemed somewhat reasonable to me other than the whole 60 degree bit.
@@radozeman That is what I was talking about. the 60 deg turn bit. Why not just say...150-170 ft lb. Are they saying we need to let the bolts "relax"... Lazy Buggers!!! LOL
TBH, In all my experience, this is the first time I have ever heard of tightening a bolt 3 times and the third time adding more torque to it. Personally, I would have bypassed all of it, after doing one bolt and finding what the toque should have been in the first place.
I would do the first stage, and finish it the second time over with the proper torque the second time for the remaining bolts. I won't say anything bad about JD...but I am now wondering.....
@Baron Marseille That is most likely correct, doesn't make it easier to try and figure out a 60 deg torque spec compared actual torque spec. Granted we are talking about a tractor that is like 25?? years old, and those things didn't exist at all