The Top 10 Weirdest Prehistoric Creatures

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 7 чер 2024
  • We know what the dinosaurs looked like thanks to fossils, but have you seen some of these bizarre prehistoric creatures? Join Michael Aranda for a new episode of SciShow and take a closer look at some of the strangest-looking animals evolution has created.
    If you liked this video, check out more videos about natural history and paleontology on SciShow's sister channel, Eons: / eons
    ----------
    Support SciShow by becoming a patron on Patreon: / scishow
    ----------
    Dooblydoo thanks go to the following Patreon supporters -- we couldn't make SciShow without them! Shout out to Justin Ove, Andreas Heydeck, Justin Lentz, Will and Sonja Marple, Benny, Chris Peters, Tim Curwick, Philippe von Bergen, Patrick, Fatima Iqbal, Lucy McGlasson, Mark Terrio-Cameron, Accalia Elementia, Kathy & Tim Philip, charles george, Kevin Bealer, Thomas J., and Patrick D. Ashmore.
    ----------
    Like SciShow? Want to help support us, and also get things to put on your walls, cover your torso and hold your liquids? Check out our awesome products over at DFTBA Records: dftba.com/scishow
    ----------
    Looking for SciShow elsewhere on the internet?
    Facebook: / scishow
    Twitter: / scishow
    Tumblr: / scishow
    Instagram: / thescishow
    ----------
    Sources:
    www.prehistoric-wildlife.com/s...
    coo.fieldofscience.com/2014/01...
    www.amnh.org/explore/news-blog...
    burgess-shale.rom.on.ca/en/fos...
    www.dinosaur-world.com/feather...
    news.nationalgeographic.com/20...
    www.prehistoric-wildlife.com/s...
    phys.org/news/2013-02-helicopr...
    phenomena.nationalgeographic.c...
    www.prehistoric-wildlife.com/s...
    www.nps.gov/bibe/learn/nature...
    journals.plos.org/plosone/arti...
    phys.org/news/2013-10-theory-p...
    • Video
    www.prehistoric-wildlife.com/s...
    www.wired.com/2011/02/extra-ar...
    prehistoric-fauna.com/Glyptodon
    Images:
    commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...
    commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...
    commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...
    commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...
    commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...
    commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...
    commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...
    commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...
    commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...
    commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...
    commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...
    commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...
    commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...
    commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...
    commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...
    commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...
    commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...
    commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1,1 тис.

  • @2DRichochet
    @2DRichochet 8 років тому +176

    How can you do a list like this and not include Opabinia regalis? The thing had 5 eyes, a backwards facing mouth, a trunk with a "mouth" on the end of it to grab stuff, and was so bizarre that scientists laughed and thought it was a joke when it was first presented in a meeting.

    • @williek08472
      @williek08472 Рік тому +36

      Don’t forget Hallucigenia, a spiny worm from the same era so named because paleontologists thought they were hallucinating when they saw it.

    • @Distant_Frontier
      @Distant_Frontier Рік тому

      He is just using popular animals for views

    • @akindlylettuce8142
      @akindlylettuce8142 Рік тому +7

      ​@@Distant_Frontier I'm sorry,but what?

    • @madsgrams2069
      @madsgrams2069 Рік тому +8

      @@williek08472 Hehe, at least for those two we, more or less, know what they are and where they fit into the animal kingdom. But what about Tullimonstrum? Even to this day, paleontologists don't agree on what it is and the speculations range from weird0 cephalopod with just one tentacle and the mouth placed at the end of it (WTF???), to really strange basal chordate (so something like a hagfish or lamprey, but very, very different, because its mouth is at the end of a trunk-like apendage and also has a sort of pincer-claw acting as a jaw, instead of no jaw at all, it has eyes on stocks and doesn't have the typical worm-shaped body plan that these creatures have) or even actual vertebrate (jawed fish)...somehow.

    • @madsgrams2069
      @madsgrams2069 Рік тому +7

      At least Opabinia doesn't actually have the mouth at the end of the trunk-like apendage, which is not something that can be said about Tullimonstrum, which evolved the same kind of structure, but in its case, the pincer-like grappling claw seems to actually have acted like a jaw and the trunk contained its esophagus... Oh, yeah, and its eyes were placed at the ends of of pretty long stocks facing to the sides...
      P.S. Forgot to mention: it lived in the Carboniferous, not the Cambrian, and, also unlike Opabinia (which was established to be some kind of stem-arthoropod, at least) it has not, to this day, been definitively placed anywhere in the animal kingdom, because paleontologists don't seem to have the slightest clue on what the eff it was and only have speculations (cause its features are not compatible to any phylum of animal we know of).

  • @kelseyrobinson1917
    @kelseyrobinson1917 8 років тому +34

    "A platypus' mom probably thinks it's handsome." That's somehow really uplifting.

  • @s3cr3tpassword
    @s3cr3tpassword 8 років тому +194

    Wow these new pokemon looks pretty cool

    • @FocusMrbjarke
      @FocusMrbjarke 8 років тому +3

      Yeah i know. You know what they say gonna catch them all

    • @unified_kings6877
      @unified_kings6877 8 років тому +14

      #10 isn't a new pokemon, its an anorith.

    • @joshuahadams
      @joshuahadams 8 років тому +5

      I read this a day after some new Pokémon were unveiled. I was confused for a bit.

    • @pifilixxiv3192
      @pifilixxiv3192 6 років тому

      but those animals could work as new fossil poke in next gens, or just fans use those as bases for new ones.

    • @travisgartside409
      @travisgartside409 4 роки тому

      These are way cooler than 99% of all the new pokemon released over theast decade

  • @EJKelly-tu9dm
    @EJKelly-tu9dm 7 років тому +487

    "YOU MIGHT THINK A PLATYPUS LOOKS WEIRD, BUT ITS MOM PROBABLY THINKS IT'S VERY HANDSOME."

  • @savagegardenrox
    @savagegardenrox 8 років тому +143

    I am now imagining a mother platypus adjusting her babies' clothes in preparation for a a professional family portrait.

  • @JustGrowingUp84
    @JustGrowingUp84 8 років тому +749

    Videogame makers should take more advantage of real life fauna and flora, present and past.
    There is no need to struggle to come up with fantastic designs when nature already did it!

    • @mistformsquirrel
      @mistformsquirrel 8 років тому +49

      The anomalacaris looks like something out of Spore as-is...

    • @JustGrowingUp84
      @JustGrowingUp84 8 років тому +8

      mistformsquirrel
      Lol, I knew they reminded me of something!

    • @euclideansquid8667
      @euclideansquid8667 8 років тому +21

      Honestly when I saw that model of anomalacaris, I immediately thought of the Pokemon Anorith, but you are right it looks like something you can easily make in Spore.

    • @mistformsquirrel
      @mistformsquirrel 8 років тому +13

      TheFilthyCasual Actually, come to think of it, some of these show up in Ark: Survival Evolved. Not all of them, but I believe Quetzacoatlus, Glyptodon, and Megatherium are all present and, I think, tamable.
      It's been awhile since I played mind, so I could be mis-remembering things a bit.

    • @shawnc1936
      @shawnc1936 8 років тому +1

      +mistformsquirrel yep and fairly accurate based on this video. Some assumptions made like the quetzal in the game does fly. But that's to be expected.

  • @32elmer
    @32elmer 8 років тому +88

    I'm working at the Los Angeles Natural History Museum and we're having a pterosaur exhibit! So excited to teach people about Quetzalcoatlus!

    • @PolinaLee94
      @PolinaLee94 4 роки тому +3

      Now say it's name 10 times on a row very quickly

    • @Distant_Frontier
      @Distant_Frontier Рік тому +1

      Hatzegopteryx better💀

  • @iamsparklyunicorn
    @iamsparklyunicorn 8 років тому +338

    If that giant millipede were still around today, I'd gtfo & head to Mars or something

    • @mikvance
      @mikvance 8 років тому +40

      We'd have to nuke Earth from orbit. Its the only way to be sure.

    • @varnageT
      @varnageT 8 років тому +15

      what about the giant cockroaches on mars that are threatening humanity?

    • @sacr3
      @sacr3 8 років тому +28

      Don't be silly, you'd be completely comfortable about it because it would be the norm, but you'd probably fear it just as you would any other large carnivorous animal or insect.
      Now, if it just "appeared" today, then yes people would be terrified.

    • @ShadeScarecrow
      @ShadeScarecrow 8 років тому +18

      Heck no, place a comfy chair on its back, hold a carrot in front of it, bam, awesome Millipede transportation xD

    • @Mental999Man
      @Mental999Man 8 років тому +4

      have you seen Terraformers? there are giant humanoid genocide-loving nazi cockroaches on mars.

  • @CrypticDiabolo
    @CrypticDiabolo 8 років тому +372

    Megatherium sounds like a good metal band name.

    • @hcn6708
      @hcn6708 8 років тому +3

      How about Theotherium?

    • @mistformsquirrel
      @mistformsquirrel 8 років тому +26

      ... is it wrong that I want them to play slow grindy doom metal? It just fits the whole sloth thing.

    • @abelramirez7320
      @abelramirez7320 8 років тому +1

      Too much like Megadeth

    • @Master_Therion
      @Master_Therion 8 років тому +2

      I agree \m/

    • @mooseplant4811
      @mooseplant4811 8 років тому +3

      there's a metal song called To Mega Therion

  • @martinshoosterman
    @martinshoosterman 8 років тому +47

    Its cool how through billions of years of evolution, and even though the giants of the world are all thought to have lived long ago, the largest animal ever still lives on earth today.

    • @ParanoidAlaskan
      @ParanoidAlaskan 8 років тому +8

      And to think we almost killed it for oil

    • @jackhenderson1039
      @jackhenderson1039 8 років тому +5

      Well at least that we've discovered.

    • @KhanMann66
      @KhanMann66 8 років тому +9

      And we nearly wiped them out. We still don't know much about them. Strange how the world largest animal can be so elusive?

    • @wschippr1
      @wschippr1 6 років тому +2

      martinshoosterman
      That we know of, for all we know there have been larger.

    • @MerkhVision
      @MerkhVision Рік тому +1

      Wait, what are u referring to? Blue Whales maybe? There’s no clue as to what you’re talking about either in your comment or in the video!

  • @Noremaad
    @Noremaad 8 років тому +213

    The Glyptodon could also fart fire, and teleport two inches in any direction.

    • @Wing0Alchemist
      @Wing0Alchemist 8 років тому +43

      True Facts About the Armadildo. Whoops, that's a typo.

    • @rosenmartin914
      @rosenmartin914 8 років тому +10

      +Wing0Alchemist Whatever happened to Zefrank1?

    • @Noremaad
      @Noremaad 8 років тому +13

      Martin Rosenmuller
      Dunno man. Wish he'd start uploading again, though. Guy's got a serious talent for comedy.

    • @discduderules
      @discduderules 8 років тому +1

      Sack_Tree

    • @dz883
      @dz883 6 років тому +3

      well thats a waste of talent.

  • @AlphaBetaDeltaGamma
    @AlphaBetaDeltaGamma 8 років тому +10

    0:17 even though they found a living specimen, the discoverer of the platypus still thought it was a joke for a long time.

  • @ovni2295
    @ovni2295 6 років тому +7

    About #10: The most exciting discovery about anomalocariids in recent times is the discovery of a fossil from a German lagerstatte (a place with lots of really good fossils) that shows an Anomalocariid...in Devonian rock. So they lived for a hundred million years after we thought they went extinct.

  • @frenchw1nter
    @frenchw1nter 8 років тому +9

    I'd love more episodes on dinosaurs - they are so completely fascinating!

  • @TheGreatSnoozer
    @TheGreatSnoozer 7 років тому +33

    Glyptodon also had a super reliable mid-size engine with really loud push rod valves.

  • @yonkiriati
    @yonkiriati 8 років тому +22

    I think that the Tullimonstrum (Tully Monster) is weirder looking than Anomalocaris

  • @reedkellner6447
    @reedkellner6447 8 років тому +6

    Cool info about these weird creatures, and an entertaining presentation. Keep up the great work, Sci Show!

  • @kovahk
    @kovahk 8 років тому +10

    This was a fun video. I knew about most of these creatures, but never thought they were as strange as you described them to be.

  • @monsieurbernoulli8101
    @monsieurbernoulli8101 7 років тому +34

    At one time in his life, Zoidberg looks like any of them.

    • @arthas640
      @arthas640 4 роки тому

      Zoidberg is best dinosaur. I dont care if he's more of a Arthropod/Decopod, he's still best dinosaur.

  • @Coyoteari
    @Coyoteari 7 років тому +289

    "Imagine a dinosaur covered in feathers" so......a dinosaur?

    • @27thlegend70
      @27thlegend70 7 років тому +6

      Mossears133 lol

    • @bongratunrthdoxtrsh5324
      @bongratunrthdoxtrsh5324 7 років тому +22

      so most therapods* most sauropods aren't proven to have feathers.

    • @alexgenel4932
      @alexgenel4932 4 роки тому +4

      [Walks in holding an unplucked chicken] BEHOLD! A DINOSAUR!
      and so it was

    • @gecko8621
      @gecko8621 3 роки тому +5

      BabaKoto brings back a memory of a very inaccurate reconstruction of a brachiosaurus where it was feathered and has a toucan beak lol it was so inaccurate and hilarious

    • @waynejohnson1786
      @waynejohnson1786 3 роки тому

      Although there’s evidence to suggest most, if not all non-avian dinosaurs had some form of feathers, we’re still not 100% sure.

  • @carltonfugere1788
    @carltonfugere1788 8 років тому +5

    You guys need more images in videos like these. :) Excellent presentation regardless, love this show!

  • @JimFortune
    @JimFortune 8 років тому +142

    Meter long shrimp? We need to start a breeding program.

    • @joachimschoder
      @joachimschoder 8 років тому +11

      They were carnivores. Imagine a swarm of those things attacking you in the open sea.

    • @JimFortune
      @JimFortune 8 років тому +47

      Joachim Schoder I'll chance it as long as I kind find enough butter and garlic.

    • @joachimschoder
      @joachimschoder 8 років тому +6

      Jim Fortune
      You might at the very least get a nice Darwin Award out of it!

    • @JimFortune
      @JimFortune 8 років тому +6

      ***** Go ahead, crush my dreams!

    • @collisionsc-7875
      @collisionsc-7875 8 років тому +3

      +Joachim Schoder aren't Darwin awards awarded to people who stupidly died?

  • @Justinbieberhater24
    @Justinbieberhater24 7 років тому +25

    A lot of these I recognize from Ice Age 😂😂

  • @kaitlinniltiak9626
    @kaitlinniltiak9626 7 років тому +2

    I would have liked to see more different pictures of each creature!!! I want to get a good look at the different features being described, and I found myself having to Google search a good number of these babies!!!
    with that said I LOVED this video, and I appreciate everything that ya'll do!

  • @5raptorboy1
    @5raptorboy1 8 років тому +8

    Those Quetzalcoatlus and Therizinosaurus pictures are terribly inaccurate. Normally, I wouldn't get mad, but this is a science channel.

    • @suedonym820
      @suedonym820 8 років тому +13

      Reference more accurate pictures then?

    • @miri_kess
      @miri_kess 8 років тому

      According to current knowledge, they are. But there aren't many people redrawing every extinct animal as our understanding changes. Not to mention quality of such pictures - I am not surprised they used nice looking vs "still-not-outdated" sketch. It's popular science thing, like thinking our genom changes only by mutations.

    • @5raptorboy1
      @5raptorboy1 8 років тому +15

      Okay, first of all, they're shrinkwrapped. That basically means that the artist decided to give no discretion to what the soft tissues might have looked like. In a real animal, the skeleton is not as pronounced and obvious. This is especially obvious in the Quetzalcoatlus pictures, and to a lesser extent in the Therizinosaurus picture. Also, we can tell from phylogenetic bracketing that it would have had pycnofibres (or feathers, depending on where you put the origin of feathers) which would have looked like a protofuzz. Here is a picture of what they would actually look like (this is coming from not only a skilled artist, but also a palaeontologist): 4.bp.blogspot.com/-OHUhOSWhvIE/Vzdmod7tj2I/AAAAAAAACIQ/V1us1HAbBwkOzle-yon82hgqdYx3DXnmwCK4B/s1600/Quetz%2Bsp.%2BWitton%2B2016%2Blow%2Bres.jpg
      The Therizinosaurus has less problems. First, the smallest problem is the feathering. It looks like it just had feathers pasted onto the featherless body, which makes no sense. You could make the argument that it would overheat the creature, but its feathers would be advanced enough in order to bypass that problem. The biggest problem are the arms. First of all, the arms are clearly not bulky enough to hold up those claws. Second of all, the hands shouldn't look like that. We can now tell that the muscles in the arms would make it impossible to hold their hands like that. They would keep their hands perpetually in a way that would make them look like they were clapping. Finally, the wings need to be bigger and extend to the second finger. Here's a good picture of a Therizinosaurus ( The theropod in the picture isn't accurate, but the Therizinosaurus is): pre13.deviantart.net/5527/th/pre/f/2012/258/5/d/canada_therizinosaurus_by_stygimolochspinifer-d5eswfo.png
      While we're here, I guess I'll critique all of the animals in this video.
      The first picture of Stegosaurus is good. The Dimetrodon could use some updating. The top of the spines would probably be exposed, leading to a half-sail look. The stance is kind of outdated. They would have probably walked more like this:img14.deviantart.net/c40a/i/2015/178/5/5/the_walking_dimetrodon_season_1_to_3_by_traheripteryx-d8yzkma.png
      Also, more mammalian features are certainly possible. Here's a good (but speculative) picture of a Dimetrodon: orig07.deviantart.net/ba0d/f/2015/205/c/5/dimetrodon_giganhomogenes_by_traheripteryx-d92mixx.png
      Also, this picture is a little outdated, because now we know that the half-sail look was more like a 75%sail look. The exposed vertebrae would be very small.
      The Microraptor looks very good.
      The second picture is bad. First of all, it has way too little feathering. Second of all, the color is wrong. In very well-preserved fossils, we can see melanosomes which tell us the color of the animal. This is very, very rare. Though, we found it for Microraptor, which tells us that it had black, crow-like feathers, and it had an iridescence, similar to modern crows. Also, the picture looks way more like a "lizard with bird wings" than "weird, four winged crow". Here's a better picture: emilywilloughby.com/gallery-data/images/full/microraptor-takeoff.jpg
      I don't know a lot about Glyptodons, and there weren't any pictures shown, anyway.
      The Macrauchenia looks good.
      Platybelodon looks good.
      No pictures were shown of Megatherium.
      I actually really like the Anomalocaris picture. Considering that little else had eyes at the time, it would make sense for them to have bright colors since camouflage wouldn't be a problem.
      All of the info is good. Though, I'm a bit dissapointed that Deinocheirus (img08.deviantart.net/71c9/i/2014/320/0/4/don_t_mess_with_deinocheirus_by_durbed-d84x94w.jpg) and Yi Qi (upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/56/Yi_qi_restoration.jpg) weren't mentioned!
      Also, there is a lot of good art of accurate dinosaurs. You just need to know where to find them. John Conway, Emily Willoughby, C.M. Koseman, R.J. Palmer, Mark Witton, and more are all good artists who make accurate dinosaurs.
      P.S. Phylogenetic bracketing is basically taking what you know about a certain animal and applying it to other ones which are closely related. This won't always be right (in the case of Spinosaurus), but it can certainly help us figure out what prehistoric animals look like. Most animals have very fragmentary fossils and not a lot of fossils, so the only way to create what they looked like is to look at other animals. For example, we only know Dakotaraptor from one fossil found very recently, which doesn't have a lot of bones, but we can tell from those bones that it was a raptor, so we depict the rest of the body like a raptor. The top right part of this picture shows the bones we have found: www.krank.ie/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/Dakotaraptor-steini-skeletal-size-reconstruction.png
      The bottom left picture is what we can infer and this is what we can infer the animal looked like with soft tissue: saurian.maxmediacorp.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/rjpalmer_dakotaraptor_conceptart_001_by_arvalis-d9ev6iw.jpg
      Okay, is that enough info?

    • @miri_kess
      @miri_kess 8 років тому

      Thank you sooo much for names of reliable artists. It is a lot easier to find good quality if you know what you re looking for. And, side note, I just realized it has ben few long years sice dinosaurs feather update. Wonder how long till it replace current image, hope not 2 generations.

    • @badtime6532
      @badtime6532 8 років тому +1

      +5raptorboy1 Ayyyyyy you're cool

  • @sagetmaster4
    @sagetmaster4 8 років тому +20

    you guys didn't even mention that anomalocaris had a mouth they think opened and closed like a camera shutter...when the whole larger than microscopic life thing was new anything went I guess

  • @DanteYewToob
    @DanteYewToob 7 років тому +3

    In the future could you show the pictures of the critters a bit longer? You show it so fast and lose it and just talk about it, when you could leave it up as you describe and explain it so the image sticks a bit better. I kept having to pause and go back and even google extra images to get a good idea of what they really looked like.
    Either way, good video as always. I love SciShow.

  • @mateogonzalez5678
    @mateogonzalez5678 8 років тому +23

    I knew like 9 out of 10 of those things so I feel proud of myself!

    • @keklypuzz1513
      @keklypuzz1513 8 років тому +5

      i knew all 10 someone help me

    • @intothecalm420
      @intothecalm420 8 років тому +2

      +Chupacabra Gaming
      I still don't know any of them. I spent the entire video reading comments. 8^)
      Hillary For Prison 2016

    • @keklypuzz1513
      @keklypuzz1513 8 років тому

      Go IntoTheCalm yea

    • @HomoSolari
      @HomoSolari 8 років тому

      I knew all 10 of them.

    • @tiedyechamp1913
      @tiedyechamp1913 8 років тому +3

      And then you cry alone in your sleep surrounded by useless trivia about dinosaurs. It's okay, buddy. I know a bunch of useless trivia too.

  • @um-vl6on
    @um-vl6on 8 років тому +25

    SciShow, you keep showing the image first, for just a second and then give the explanation afterward. It would be more pleasant if you showing the image every once and a while when you explaining its features. And more images will be great

    • @nadinescott2509
      @nadinescott2509 4 роки тому

      7788um I agree these things are interesting , I d like a better look too!

  • @rastacoon5962
    @rastacoon5962 8 років тому +47

    What would happen if you put a mating pair of arthropods in an oxygen rich tank and waited for a few generations? Would they grow huge? Someone test this, please, now I have to know.

    • @portkapul1283
      @portkapul1283 8 років тому +12

      unlike people and most animals insects are kinda like trees in that they will grow as big as their environment lets them, so they should increase in size within the first generation. This is not evolution at play. I have read about this and test have been done. I will try to find a link to something official but you can do a quick google search.

    • @rastacoon5962
      @rastacoon5962 8 років тому

      Port Kapul
      In the case you are correct this is reassuring

    • @ErgoCogita
      @ErgoCogita 8 років тому +5

      +Port Kapul _"unlike people and most animals insects are kinda like trees in that they will grow as big as their environment lets them"_
      This is wrong. Most insects will only grow as large as their genes allow them to, first and foremost. Only then does environment play any sort of role. That being said, the extreme vast majority of insects will not continue to grow in size simply because of high oxygen availability because none of them have any genes left over from the millions upon millions of years of selective pressures in the absence of such high oxygen levels.

    • @portkapul1283
      @portkapul1283 8 років тому +5

      I know I am vastly simplifying things but I can't explain everything, especially on a topic I am not an expert. I was searching for something to quote and this will do "Dragonflies responded to the high oxygen levels, swelling to 15 percent larger than those reared in normal oxygen levels" research.asu.edu/stories/big-insects-provide-big-answers-about-oxygen
      While this study does show that not all insects increase in size with higher oxygen levels it does support my statement that insects will increase in size if environmental conditions allow.

    • @XBOXGAMRS
      @XBOXGAMRS 8 років тому +3

      Evolution is based on chance and need, not need and want

  • @Calus767
    @Calus767 8 років тому +1

    These are some of my favorite scishow videos. Prehistoric animals, and especially the ones to do with early humans!

  • @hywodena
    @hywodena 8 років тому +52

    As someone who was a dino kid, I already knew about 90% of these (though I did learn some stuff because my memory is a bit fuzzy, and obviously scientists have learned more)

    • @alexjordan8838
      @alexjordan8838 8 років тому

      Same

    • @theintrepid7583
      @theintrepid7583 8 років тому

      Same, I knew them all except for #5 and #7.

    • @ashleyhill3489
      @ashleyhill3489 8 років тому

      That's a pretty cool emu in your avatar

    • @unpaintedcanvas
      @unpaintedcanvas 8 років тому

      The only one I didn't know about was the elephant ancestor.

    • @TheJprox
      @TheJprox 8 років тому

      Well I was a human kid but, just like an actor I admire, I too liked dinosaurs and other ancient creatures. Thus I too knew about some of these.

  • @RXTRUX1
    @RXTRUX1 4 роки тому +3

    Some animations showing how these adaptations worked would be very nice.

  • @sarahsmith2583
    @sarahsmith2583 8 років тому +42

    This is the most offensive title I have ever seen. Why can't ALL animals be beautiful? When will this bias against prehistoric animals end?! #PrehistoricsAreBeautiful #YoureOnTheWrongSideOfHistorySpecificallyTwoHundredThousandYears

    • @TorquemadaTwist
      @TorquemadaTwist 8 років тому +5

      Millions of years from now it'll happen to us. When all the climate changes and asteroid strikes have changed earth and the dominant species, the platypus, does archeology, they'll laugh at the bill-less tail-less bipedal creatures they unearth.

    • @donotcare57656
      @donotcare57656 8 років тому +3

      This is incorrect. If the platypus/platypi/platypeople/platyWTF developed intelligence, they would look in the mirror, and just think "WTF is wrong with us?!?!?" and then kill themselves.

    • @TorquemadaTwist
      @TorquemadaTwist 8 років тому +1

      Caprikel I disagree. I've seen a guy on TV whose hair is ridiculous yet he never did the sensible thing and raze it down to the scalp and salt it so nothing else would grow. Clearly good taste is not evolutionarily necessary.

    • @sarahsmith2583
      @sarahsmith2583 8 років тому +2

      +Koopix Actually, I think you'll find it's one of the, "most dumb".

    • @collisionsc-7875
      @collisionsc-7875 8 років тому +1

      So many people don't get the joke/sarcasm...

  • @saulodoamordivino
    @saulodoamordivino 8 років тому +11

    Game Freak, take notes. I'm sick of fucking sets of keys and ice cream cones.

  • @NessaWyvern
    @NessaWyvern 6 років тому +2

    8:29
    A wild Anorith appeared!

  • @christiansiegert9895
    @christiansiegert9895 8 років тому +23

    Insert a 0.5 or 1 second pause between segments. It feels too rushed. Sometimes he was talking about the next creature but there was no audible clue. No pauses to group segments/ideas makes it harder to follow.

  • @giverofzerophux9051
    @giverofzerophux9051 8 років тому +10

    was number 10 the great ancestor of Dr. Zoidburg?

  • @CharxGaming
    @CharxGaming 8 років тому +1

    after working on this show for years, the amount of knowledge these guys n girls must have accumulated must be insane

  • @duhduhvesta
    @duhduhvesta 8 років тому

    love this. more please.

  • @jamescook2412
    @jamescook2412 8 років тому +8

    I want a Jurassic Park 5 with all these weird dinosaurs! I wonderwhat the storyline could be

    • @viyusavery248
      @viyusavery248 8 років тому +1

      ummmm they discovered that some prehistoric bacteria/microbe creates some kind of chemical substance while it metabolizes that can cure cancer, aids etc but the microbe cannot exist for too long in a test-tube so it needs its original host(s) which are the weird dinosaurs in this video, word got out of the project and sadly it was a project too ambitious and threatening for major pharmacy companies that thrive on the profit of expensive ineffective treatment that needs constant installments
      Using their money/influenece/corruption these pharmacy leaders got the president involved so as to shut down the operation and threatened their life if they did not cooperate, with their passion still in check they agreed with nods but in their hearts they had other plans. they decided to use all their life savings and got aid from others who believed in the potential of the project(in secret of course) the plan was to continue operation in a place where little or no humans trod(like some amazon or something)
      eventually a destination was set, it was on the island "ukygraewhiearewi"(i cant think of an exact place lol) they "moved in" deep deep into the lands with their heavy equipment etc and they successfully set up thanks to an escort called Roceth who stared them away from the grounds where the "uncontacted" tribe ujuk trod, after months/years they successfully recreated the habitat for the dinosaurs and started to work on the cure(s)
      but something went wrong and the dinosaurs went on a rampage destroying equipment etc, running for their life they crossed path with the savage meat loving ujuk tribe, being the savages they are the ujuk tribe took down the rampaging dinosaurs that were attacking the scientist. but the scientist were next to be attacked.. but thankfully Roceth was around and spoke their language, the tribe master trusted him and offered them refuge
      motivated to learn to defend themselves like the ujuk, the scientists adapted to their lifestyles etc some became comfortable and almost forgot about their old lives but this kindness backfired on the ujuk tribe as they fell ill and some even died from the common cold that the scientists brought to them , so the scientist now with new "tribe skills" made a plan to go back to the research grounds fighting dinosaurs on the way to provide the tribe with treatment and eventually leave the island and give up on their dream to sure the world the end :D

    • @target-drone9481
      @target-drone9481 8 років тому

      Or you could play ARK:Survival Evolved even if the dino facts are WRONG.

    • @FocusMrbjarke
      @FocusMrbjarke 8 років тому

      +assefa hanson you lost me at ummmmm sorry to long to read

    • @viyusavery248
      @viyusavery248 8 років тому

      ***** you cant make a script/storyline in 3 sentences lol, if he asked for a premise sentence then that could be 1 sentence

    • @FocusMrbjarke
      @FocusMrbjarke 8 років тому

      +assefa hanson oh

  • @zikzakfr
    @zikzakfr 8 років тому +57

    Why do I think "Pokémon" when I watch these beasts?

    • @owmyeye6157
      @owmyeye6157 8 років тому +2

      There needs to be a Therizinosaurus Pokemon eventually.

    • @syrendsong
      @syrendsong 8 років тому +6

      I think anorith is based on the last one, but i'm not sure ;w;

    • @owmyeye6157
      @owmyeye6157 8 років тому

      Definitely.

    • @craftykittygaming7820
      @craftykittygaming7820 8 років тому

      Helicopteron or whatever needs to be a thing. BUZZSAWROBOSHARK!

    • @majormissile5596
      @majormissile5596 8 років тому +1

      I was thinking Archeops was based on that microraptor.

  • @LlNDEN
    @LlNDEN 8 років тому

    Awesome episode!

  • @LasDrakeo360
    @LasDrakeo360 8 років тому

    loved this subject!!!!

  • @blunteddful
    @blunteddful 8 років тому +114

    Dude, the number ten is obviously an Anorith; it's a Pokémon, duh.

    • @Nadiki
      @Nadiki 8 років тому

      Ermagherd a red Anorith! Wait...

    • @Jim-ti5ck
      @Jim-ti5ck 8 років тому

      What kind of stupid name for a pokemon is Armaldo? Sounds more like the name of a guy you'd buy food from in Bogota.

    • @Jim-ti5ck
      @Jim-ti5ck 8 років тому

      ***** I know, but still.

    • @djprincegrandmasteryrjdalo2905
      @djprincegrandmasteryrjdalo2905 8 років тому

      Hey don't insult my country bruh! Also I think the name comes from the word Armor,which is something that it has.

    • @MarkShaneHansen
      @MarkShaneHansen 8 років тому

      There's no Pokémon called Anorith, though.

  • @alexjordan8838
    @alexjordan8838 8 років тому +13

    12000-3mil years ago....a bit specific don't you think?

    • @heymrhimr
      @heymrhimr 8 років тому +9

      A lot of that time also includes how long the animal lasted from/until.

    • @schmoovin2915
      @schmoovin2915 8 років тому +3

      Nah

  • @Infinitysquaredorsomething
    @Infinitysquaredorsomething 6 років тому +2

    I knew about a lot of these. Thanks, Dinosaur Train!
    (And a book called Over 1000 animal facts did most of it.)

  • @YoshiBroccoli
    @YoshiBroccoli 6 років тому

    THANK YOU the only video that actually talked about theriznosaurs

  • @dilo19000
    @dilo19000 8 років тому +10

    If i could add some information to a few of these
    2. All Pterosaurs could walk on all their limbs, it was necessary for them to take off since they have strong arms for flight, they also used those arms for taking off, which is one of the many reasons they are allowed to get much larger than birds. Skim Feeding in water is impossible for any known Pterosaur, it would break the jaws with such force, Dip feeding is a much more likely candidate for any pterosaur that fed on fish.
    5. A recent study shows that Glyptodons are infact armadillos ( www.bbc.com/news/35630712 and phys.org/news/2016-02-extinct-glyptodonts-gigantic-armadillos-ancient.html ) though DNA evidence.
    8. I'm surprised you didn't mention the bones embedded in the skin that would act like chainmail.

  • @thedunkey27
    @thedunkey27 8 років тому +171

    #evolution

  • @caddilacbob
    @caddilacbob 8 років тому +2

    2: literally a Wyvern
    10: literally that thing everyone made in stage 1 of spore

  • @SpaceLDandy
    @SpaceLDandy 8 років тому

    I couldn't help but listen to every time he took a breath.
    once I noticed it, I couldn't unhear it.

  • @RiiLove
    @RiiLove 7 років тому +13

    the host is a freaking baaaaaaabbbbeeeee ♡

  • @thes7274473
    @thes7274473 8 років тому +7

    You think anomalocaris was weird? You should see opabimia.

  • @Snakeyes244
    @Snakeyes244 8 років тому

    excellent episode

  • @johannes2876
    @johannes2876 8 років тому

    10 strange-looking Prehistoric Animals? I LOVE strange-looking prehistoric animals! Great video as always.

  • @EduardQualls
    @EduardQualls 4 роки тому +6

    "The teeth belonged in the jaw..."
    Shark skin: Hold my beer.

  • @juliettek3609
    @juliettek3609 8 років тому +5

    This man's hair should've been number 10.

  • @TaiganTundra
    @TaiganTundra 8 років тому +1

    One of my favorite weird prehistoric fauna is Meganeura, an eagle sized dragonfly.

  • @AB7371
    @AB7371 8 років тому

    I love Michael Aranda and I love weird dinosaurs. This was great.

  • @Nooneaskedforthis
    @Nooneaskedforthis 8 років тому +6

    Maybe keep the picture up longer so we can see what he is talking about.

  • @Pzevv
    @Pzevv 8 років тому +14

    Evolution is an odd thing

    • @mariebelfond29
      @mariebelfond29 8 років тому +2

      because it false

    • @badt2238
      @badt2238 8 років тому +3

      +Marie Belfond really. freaking stupid. im christian and beleive in evolution. it is real so ur straight dumb.

    • @falaqueeuajudo
      @falaqueeuajudo 8 років тому

      you're funny, Marie

    • @briangarrow448
      @briangarrow448 8 років тому +4

      +Marie Belfond Stop lying. You know damn well that evolution has been scientifically proven repeatedly. your statement makes you look foolish, stupid,or a religious nut case.

    • @hancholo5897
      @hancholo5897 8 років тому

      +Marie Belfond please...adults are talking

  • @barbarawatkins3636
    @barbarawatkins3636 2 роки тому

    I love Edge, its always got the weird, strange and unusual on it. Very interesting to me. Thanx

  • @shaneadams589
    @shaneadams589 8 років тому

    I loved this video!!!

  • @bensteinhart9268
    @bensteinhart9268 8 років тому +3

    For #2, ALL pterosaurs walked like that!!!

    • @keklypuzz1513
      @keklypuzz1513 8 років тому

      not all pterasaurs walked though

    • @officertopheavy3232
      @officertopheavy3232 8 років тому

      They can't literally fly for their whole lives; so all of them would have had to walk at some point; they may not all have been very good at it, or very fast; but they still had to walk sometimes!

    • @bensteinhart9268
      @bensteinhart9268 8 років тому

      +Argolf Exactly, he/she/it gets it!

    • @officertopheavy3232
      @officertopheavy3232 8 років тому

      Ben Steinhart If you're referring to me; I'm a he!

    • @bensteinhart9268
      @bensteinhart9268 8 років тому +1

      +Argolf Sorry, HE.

  • @wangstanation6400
    @wangstanation6400 6 років тому +5

    yeeet!! a shout out to idaho!!!

  • @ThatJaymsWisdom
    @ThatJaymsWisdom 8 років тому

    Love this video.

  • @gabrielp8174
    @gabrielp8174 8 років тому +2

    Interesting vid, could have used more pic tho. Keep it up sci show :)

  • @NecrosVideos
    @NecrosVideos 7 років тому +47

    A lot of these are in the game Ark Survival Evolved haha!

    • @pifilixxiv3192
      @pifilixxiv3192 6 років тому

      you dont say my mate *hohohoho*

    • @d1moabz28
      @d1moabz28 6 років тому +1

      And they r all wrong haha!

    • @michagrill9432
      @michagrill9432 6 років тому

      NecrosVideos You here?!? 😁😁

    • @ethanrichards2053
      @ethanrichards2053 6 років тому +2

      Ark makes me glad that micro Raptors are extinct..

    • @Lotje250
      @Lotje250 5 років тому

      @@ethanrichards2053 same as arthropluera, but that's just me... XD

  • @1631631000
    @1631631000 8 років тому +4

    HERE CUME THE GIANT BEE MOVIE BUG'-' 🌟🌟best joke ever

    • @ewan.cartwright
      @ewan.cartwright 8 років тому +1

      B-Movie, as in a low budget and fairly rubbish film, not a film about bees.

    • @conduit64
      @conduit64 8 років тому +2

      Already exists, "The Swarm" and "The Bees" both 1978.

  • @GuyWithAnAmazingHat
    @GuyWithAnAmazingHat 8 років тому +2

    I was expecting the Tully Monster, nothing looks like it.

  • @flatflatspin9855
    @flatflatspin9855 8 років тому

    Good show! :-)

  • @jeremyj.5687
    @jeremyj.5687 7 років тому +29

    A Haiku for Quetzalcoatlus:
    Quetzalcoatlus
    Not only a dinosaur
    Grandpa of Big Bird

    • @lucaskebow8368
      @lucaskebow8368 7 років тому +10

      Jeremy J. Quetzalcoatlus is not a dinosaur. It is a pterosaur. Those two are not the same thing.

    • @carterkeller-chicoine2977
      @carterkeller-chicoine2977 6 років тому +1

      Not only a dinosaur?!?!? It wasn't a dinosaur, so it wasn't a bird o related to birds...

  • @august-5085
    @august-5085 7 років тому +5

    so much of these things are in Ark

  • @0frankenstein
    @0frankenstein 8 років тому

    I think Michael Aranda is one of my favs on Scishow!

  • @mikel6668
    @mikel6668 4 роки тому

    great video

  • @TheLinnux1
    @TheLinnux1 7 років тому +8

    Ark anybody?

    • @genessab
      @genessab 7 років тому +1

      TheLinnux1 what about it? An incredibly old myth first described in the epic of Gilgamesh and stolen for the book of genesis, an incredibly inaccurate, metaphor filled creation myth of a herding society?

    • @oscarsamaniego2048
      @oscarsamaniego2048 7 років тому +3

      Vikings488
      Ark: Survival Evolved.
      It's a game.

  • @ralfjuh9033
    @ralfjuh9033 7 років тому +5

    So almost all the animals here are in Ark

  • @Clever_Catchphrase
    @Clever_Catchphrase 8 років тому

    Microraptor Gui is my favorite dinosaur. I love its name and its look and I love teaching them to everyone I know~

  • @jasminelarsonion8400
    @jasminelarsonion8400 5 років тому

    Thanks for delivering such interesting information with such sexiness Mr. Arranda 🤟

  • @koibutsu
    @koibutsu 6 років тому +4

    can you freaking keep pictures up longer and not so blurrred out

  • @arodrigues2843
    @arodrigues2843 5 років тому +4

    Interesting video, BUT too much time showing the guy, and very short time of the species' images.!!!
    Should be the other way around.!!!

  • @gregdison
    @gregdison 8 років тому

    I really love this buzzfeed video.

  • @wakatheplatypus8737
    @wakatheplatypus8737 8 років тому

    Dinosaurs are amazing ! I love all Dino stuff =D

  • @johannpecan2049
    @johannpecan2049 7 років тому +4

    ARK

  • @tomasbdepaula
    @tomasbdepaula 4 роки тому +1

    Important correction: actually many arthropods DO have circulatory systems. This includes chelicerates and crustaceans, for example (remember horseshoe crab blood?). Insects and myryapods (mostly) lack hemoglobin and hemocyanin, so those guys do rely on diffusion via their tracheae.

  • @CotaViking
    @CotaViking 8 років тому

    Awsome!!

  • @rparl
    @rparl 7 років тому

    Wow. A lot more dinos than I realized. And the blond lock is back!

  • @faithcantrell8378
    @faithcantrell8378 8 років тому

    #5 and #6 are in the second Ice Age movie and you just don't know how happy that makes me

  • @rebeccalopez3397
    @rebeccalopez3397 8 років тому

    hello, I bare no ill will, this was great and informative ! I learned a lot ! but, if I may suggest, it would have been nicer to see more pictures of the animals

  • @likhi13
    @likhi13 6 років тому

    I love this show😘😍

  • @darkmega24ify
    @darkmega24ify 5 років тому +1

    Anomalocaris looks so much like the Fossil Pokemon Anorith. I guess that's where it got its inspiration in appearance and name.

  • @sebastienh1100
    @sebastienh1100 4 роки тому

    « Is weird but his mum probably finds him very handsome »... very true of the presenters of Scishow :)

  • @iCanHasRandomness
    @iCanHasRandomness 8 років тому

    gotta catch em all!

  • @Guru_1092
    @Guru_1092 7 років тому +2

    Hey! The Glyptodon was in Ice Age. So that's what that turtle thing was.

  • @TheFlamingDraco
    @TheFlamingDraco 6 років тому

    FINALLY. Someone who gives there sources.

  • @RoonMian
    @RoonMian 8 років тому

    You could make an episode about the mouth of Anomalocharis. I saw it in a documentary once like 20 years ago and I still have nightmares about it sometimes.

  • @angiecontreras9324
    @angiecontreras9324 3 роки тому

    ok so, i love this channel. i want to see the pictures for longer than half a second please. i love the presenters, very nice, but also, pictures. please

  • @robertcross9863
    @robertcross9863 2 роки тому +1

    0:21 to be honest the platypus was considered a joke when first presented by the explorers to the sciences

  • @eclair6910
    @eclair6910 4 роки тому +1

    yay this video correctly called them "Saber Toothed-Cats". Thank you for getting science right. One thing that isn't right is suggesting that they used their teeth to puncture skulls. Their teeth were thin and very brittle, as evident from the numerous times broken sabers have been found.