Good to see that some people payed attention to the dialogue ! And remember that plot point 44 years after the movie's release 😂 (and multiple repeated viewings) ! But of course I guess any "true" Star Wars fan will know that Vader used Han and Leia as bait to lure Luke to him...
I was always under the impression Han Solo was tortured as a way to Summon Luke. Vader knew Luke would feel Solo's pain through the force and be motivated to rescue him. Not saying it makes it 'ok'...but there was purpose the madness.
Even more. all three were tortured. as they were Luke's friends. and Luke spoke with Yoda regarding the fact that he was seeing his friends being tortured in force visions.
License to Kill also includes a dude imploding from decompression, Benicio being ground into bits and another guy being half eaten by a shark. By far the .most gruesome Bond movie
Except in Looper, wouldn't Seth's surgical amputation radically change the very fact that future Seth got away in the first place? The removal of body parts would have prevented future Seth from running away in the first place, thus no surgical amputations, but then future Seth escapes, which means head explodes.
The point where the movie falls apart for me. If he was scarred with the address in the past, the address would have always been there on his arm. If they amputated a finger he would have always had a missing finger and would not have been surprised by it in the future.
I think we shouldn't assume we can fully predict how changes to time would appear to people who are somewhere else within the flow of time. I know I've never seen what it looks like when somebody's past is changed from the future, and I'm fairly certain nobody else in this comment section has either. Yes, it makes linear, 3-dimensional sense that mutilating Seth when he's younger would mean he always had those injuries and wouldn't have been surprised by his missing finger, etc. But Seth's very existence is no longer linear and 3-dimensional. And personally I'm fine with the idea that this has altered his relationship to causality in a unique and interesting way.
You absolutely got the torture scene in empire wrong. The one and only reason for this was to make Han tremoring the force through space and time, for Luke to recognize. Vader knew, there is a bond of friendship between them and he hadn't any clue, where the son of Skywalker is whereabout. This is a ruthless and efficient way to lure him to cloud city. Something very Vader. Regarding the Matrix, the removal of humans is a regular task for those drones, as people die in their pods and need to be removed. There are millions, if not billion of people locked in the matrix, so dayly, hundreds, thousands and more people die in their captivity and need to be disposed. The real disturbing detail is the smell of rotten, which must be there...
I hated that Rooney Mara wasn't brought back for future "Dragon Tattoo" films. I read all the books. While Noomi Rapace was incredible in the role, Claire Foy brought nothing to the character. Meanwhile, in my opinion, Rooney Mara was the embodiment of Lisbeth Salander. After her portrayal, anyone else would have large shoes to fill.
I never believed The Dark Knight Joker was a former soldier. There is too much information to cover and the Joker is supposed to be a mystery. My guess he was related to soldiers who were treated poorly.
I think it would be a candidate for earlier in the list, but "It's A Wonderful Life" has a good one: in the normal timeline, George Bailey's housing development was put on top of a graveyard. It gets worse when you consider these are low-income people possibly drinking tainted well water on a possibly haunted site (especially if it was like in Poltergeist where they didn't move the bodies). It's only implied because they don't outright say in the movie that it was put on top of a graveyard. Instead, the audience sees George Bailey's brother in the alternate timeline would have been buried in a graveyard on the same spot that in the main timeline George Bailey would use for a housing development years after he prevented his brother's death.
Sorry, but I gotta make a few corrections. 1) Han Solo's Torture: Vader is many things: Brutal, Cold, Merciless...but he is not sadistic. His torture of Han was to increase the pain, suffering & despair of Luke's friends, knowing Luke would feel it through the Force and come to save his friends. That's all. It was a means to an end. If killing them quickly would have worked as well, he would have simply done that. 2) Drowning in the Matrix: The only humans who have woken from the matrix are those that were red-pilled. There is only ONE known human to have self-extracted from the Matrix, and that is Michael Karl Popper (referred to as "The Kid" in the 2nd Matrix movie). In the Animatrix movie, you see his backstory. Only he has self-awoken. So, don't fear: The ones that have been flushed by the machines were already dead or immediately picked up by the human renegades.
Joker DOESN'T slit Gambles throat. He cuts his cheek (creating the same scar) & he isn't actually dead. Just his next scene was cut to make people think he was killed. He wasn't. Also, Empire Strikes Back...have you actually watched it??? 🤨 Finally, that's a stingray tail, not a lizard, in Licence to Kill.
You can find these 'details' throughout James Bond history until today. Daniel Craig's Bond e.g. leaves a villain in the middle of a desert and gives him a can of motor oil, betting that he'll make it twenty miles before being tempted to drink it.
2:54. And it's generally agreed that the third one always the worst. We can at least agree the third one's always the worst. Lampshades X-Men The Last Stand(third in a trilogy) in X-Men Apocalypse(itself a third film, which didn't do so well critically as well).
I tried showing Looper to someone who made it to the amputation scene and complained about the movie not holding her interest. I became legitimately mad and resented her after that
The troglodyte wm0en of Bone Tomahawk having had their limbs removed, blinded, and possibly/probably muted breeding vessels wasn't implied. They are clearly shown in the movie.
Should include Alien and lamberts death, why was her pants and shoes removed but the alien, what did it do to her. Numerous discussions but never fully answered
Han was tortured to see how much he could take. If he survived the torture mostly unscathed (physically), he'd be more likely to survive carbon freezing. Drawing Luke out due to his friend's suffering was secondary; first and foremost, Vader had to ensure that the Emperor's Prize would not be damaged.
It's literally spelled out on Daghgoba that Han was tortured to draw Luke to Cloud City when he saw their suffering through the Force.
Came here say the same thing, but you beat me to it. Take my like.
Came here to point this out.
THANK YOU!!!
"They didn't ask me any questions."
Good to see that some people payed attention to the dialogue ! And remember that plot point 44 years after the movie's release 😂 (and multiple repeated viewings) ! But of course I guess any "true" Star Wars fan will know that Vader used Han and Leia as bait to lure Luke to him...
I was always under the impression Han Solo was tortured as a way to Summon Luke. Vader knew Luke would feel Solo's pain through the force and be motivated to rescue him. Not saying it makes it 'ok'...but there was purpose the madness.
Even more. all three were tortured. as they were Luke's friends. and Luke spoke with Yoda regarding the fact that he was seeing his friends being tortured in force visions.
License to Kill also includes a dude imploding from decompression, Benicio being ground into bits and another guy being half eaten by a shark. By far the .most gruesome Bond movie
You mean exploding?
"What did he promise you, his heart? Give her his heart!"
And that's how you introduce a villain.
Plus him making a joke about it later "You liked my little Valentine?"
how did Michael Myers' incest baby with his own niece in Halloween 6 not make this list?
Except in Looper, wouldn't Seth's surgical amputation radically change the very fact that future Seth got away in the first place? The removal of body parts would have prevented future Seth from running away in the first place, thus no surgical amputations, but then future Seth escapes, which means head explodes.
The point where the movie falls apart for me. If he was scarred with the address in the past, the address would have always been there on his arm. If they amputated a finger he would have always had a missing finger and would not have been surprised by it in the future.
@alanfoxman5291 major headscratchers.
I think we shouldn't assume we can fully predict how changes to time would appear to people who are somewhere else within the flow of time. I know I've never seen what it looks like when somebody's past is changed from the future, and I'm fairly certain nobody else in this comment section has either.
Yes, it makes linear, 3-dimensional sense that mutilating Seth when he's younger would mean he always had those injuries and wouldn't have been surprised by his missing finger, etc. But Seth's very existence is no longer linear and 3-dimensional. And personally I'm fine with the idea that this has altered his relationship to causality in a unique and interesting way.
You absolutely got the torture scene in empire wrong. The one and only reason for this was to make Han tremoring the force through space and time, for Luke to recognize. Vader knew, there is a bond of friendship between them and he hadn't any clue, where the son of Skywalker is whereabout. This is a ruthless and efficient way to lure him to cloud city. Something very Vader.
Regarding the Matrix, the removal of humans is a regular task for those drones, as people die in their pods and need to be removed. There are millions, if not billion of people locked in the matrix, so dayly, hundreds, thousands and more people die in their captivity and need to be disposed. The real disturbing detail is the smell of rotten, which must be there...
Yeah, that's how I always understood it.
I... it was specifically spelled out why Han was tortured... the pain drew him there. Who misses this? I didn't when I saw them as a child o_O
I loved the 911 call in Running Scared. "I heard gunshots!" and gives the address. The couple knew they were dead 😂😂
I hated that Rooney Mara wasn't brought back for future "Dragon Tattoo" films. I read all the books. While Noomi Rapace was incredible in the role, Claire Foy brought nothing to the character. Meanwhile, in my opinion, Rooney Mara was the embodiment of Lisbeth Salander. After her portrayal, anyone else would have large shoes to fill.
Yup!She was perfect,had a hard time separating her from the book Lisbeth,Mara WAS Lisbeth 🖤🖤🖤🖤
License to Kill : it’s not a lizard’s tail - it’s the tail of a stingray with the sting removed.
*Han wasn't tourtered for info. He was tourtered so that Luke would sense it and rush to his friends aide*
9:56 Bull, you intended the heck out of that pun! Admit it!
I never believed The Dark Knight Joker was a former soldier. There is too much information to cover and the Joker is supposed to be a mystery. My guess he was related to soldiers who were treated poorly.
“Anything short of an accident” makes no sense
Sure it does. Just because you can't grasp the meaning doesn't mean it doesn't make sense to more literate people.
'Bone Tomahawk' hits hard.
This seems like a way to have built on deniability.... 😂😂😂
9:50 I'm assuming that the narrator meant to say emaciated... maybe?
Seems like every What Culture video has similar hilarious misreads. 😂
I think it would be a candidate for earlier in the list, but "It's A Wonderful Life" has a good one: in the normal timeline, George Bailey's housing development was put on top of a graveyard. It gets worse when you consider these are low-income people possibly drinking tainted well water on a possibly haunted site (especially if it was like in Poltergeist where they didn't move the bodies).
It's only implied because they don't outright say in the movie that it was put on top of a graveyard. Instead, the audience sees George Bailey's brother in the alternate timeline would have been buried in a graveyard on the same spot that in the main timeline George Bailey would use for a housing development years after he prevented his brother's death.
_The Dark Knight_ isnt implied, it just happens off-screen.
CUCKOO to all these movies: "Hold my beer."
Sorry, but I gotta make a few corrections. 1) Han Solo's Torture: Vader is many things: Brutal, Cold, Merciless...but he is not sadistic. His torture of Han was to increase the pain, suffering & despair of Luke's friends, knowing Luke would feel it through the Force and come to save his friends. That's all. It was a means to an end. If killing them quickly would have worked as well, he would have simply done that. 2) Drowning in the Matrix: The only humans who have woken from the matrix are those that were red-pilled. There is only ONE known human to have self-extracted from the Matrix, and that is Michael Karl Popper (referred to as "The Kid" in the 2nd Matrix movie). In the Animatrix movie, you see his backstory. Only he has self-awoken. So, don't fear: The ones that have been flushed by the machines were already dead or immediately picked up by the human renegades.
A lizard tail
No mention of Chinatown?
Forgot it. It's Chinatown.
I'm concerned about the idea of "within 90 minutes." Some of the best films go for 120, 180 minutes in order to get their point across!
Joker DOESN'T slit Gambles throat. He cuts his cheek (creating the same scar) & he isn't actually dead. Just his next scene was cut to make people think he was killed. He wasn't.
Also, Empire Strikes Back...have you actually watched it??? 🤨
Finally, that's a stingray tail, not a lizard, in Licence to Kill.
Joker...tom waits.
Poke your nose where it doesn't belong and you lose it.
You can find these 'details' throughout James Bond history until today.
Daniel Craig's Bond e.g. leaves a villain in the middle of a desert and gives him a can of motor oil, betting that he'll make it twenty miles before being tempted to drink it.
I don’t think any of the henchmen in the Dark Knight survived after that scene. I don’t remember seeing them again in the film.
2:54. And it's generally agreed that the third one always the worst. We can at least agree the third one's always the worst. Lampshades X-Men The Last Stand(third in a trilogy) in X-Men Apocalypse(itself a third film, which didn't do so well critically as well).
MIB3 is the only decent one but these days i cant stand will smith
@BaronVonSlap-DeBak Oscar Slap incident?
@BaronVonSlap-DeBak also Logan is the third of a trilogy that was great while Origins was the first and was less than stellar.
@@davidchism6081 partly the slap and partly the fact how he wouldnt take work unless he was front and centre
@@BaronVonSlap-DeBak as in, either he's one of the main characters, not pushed to the side or background of scenes, or not at all?
YT is nerfed beyond repair...
we all clicked to see the Bone Tomahawk scene and it's all blurry 😤
9:49 There is no letter "N" in "emaciated"
Cool list
VinDICTive, not vindicAtive, is not a variation on indicative. What is it with sight reading nowadays?!
Did you even look that up before you came to a wrong conclusion?
I tried showing Looper to someone who made it to the amputation scene and complained about the movie not holding her interest. I became legitimately mad and resented her after that
Best scenes where your mind fills in the gaps was too long a title for a video, I guess
Yikes
The troglodyte wm0en of Bone Tomahawk having had their limbs removed, blinded, and possibly/probably muted breeding vessels wasn't implied. They are clearly shown in the movie.
What Happened To Jamie In Halloween 6
WhatCulture keeps getting worse, dimbing down cinema 🙄😂😂😂
Should include Alien and lamberts death, why was her pants and shoes removed but the alien, what did it do to her. Numerous discussions but never fully answered
Han was tortured to see how much he could take. If he survived the torture mostly unscathed (physically), he'd be more likely to survive carbon freezing. Drawing Luke out due to his friend's suffering was secondary; first and foremost, Vader had to ensure that the Emperor's Prize would not be damaged.
"Vindicative," "emanciated..."
🤦♀
Being given the option to translate this comment into english kinda says it all.
Emaciated is pronounced ee-may-see-ay-ted, not eMANciated. I'm sorry, I know I've nitpicked your pronunciations before, but it's a pet peeve of mine.
This was just a bad video. I use to be one of your defenders...
Help This Channel? Jet Fury🙏