This woman is pretty dangerous. She looks normal, but at the same time saying crazy things. When you are being asked if you condemn Hamas or not the only right answer is "yes, I condemn".
I think you are missing crucial points :- 1. Israel has killed , directly, thousands of civilians since 1948 2. This death toll and other abuses of human rights led to Oct 7th 3. She said at the beginning that all loss of life was wrong - on both sides. 4. As the Palestinians are hostages themselves in Gaza , it is difficult to say " we condemn Hamas " because at the same time it is their RIGHT under International Law TO violently resist when passive resistance has failed. That is a very difficult spot to be in. 5. So she is not approving of Hamas and Hamas had not been voted for since 2006, BUT she is saying " we have a Right to Defend our Human Rights of Freedom and that is ONLY because International Law has been flouted ie there should not be any occupation of Gaza or Wrst Bank So remove the occupation, removes the cause of violence. But Israel won't do that because it WANTS violence and an excuse to wipe out all Palestinians in that area and expand its borders. The UN and NATO are actually helping Israel to do that by IGNORING International Law and not enforcing it through sanctions. You cannot victimise people and put them in an Apartheid situation and expect them to be happy and not rebel. Israel and Israelis would not accept such , so why should Palestinians ?
Shame on th CBC
yes it is apartheid
It's time for a compilation of CBC pushing biased talking points
CBC is very GOOD at regurgitating State Department talking points, pretending to be serious journalists, "extremely serious journalists"..
🙄
Cbc is liberal funded propaganda
I like how she says we are dealing with symptoms.
This quote from the end "Do palestians have the right to defend themselves?"
Amazing.
The same can be said about any war I believe
This woman is pretty dangerous. She looks normal, but at the same time saying crazy things. When you are being asked if you condemn Hamas or not the only right answer is "yes, I condemn".
I think you are missing crucial points :-
1. Israel has killed , directly, thousands of civilians since 1948
2. This death toll and other abuses of human rights led to Oct 7th
3. She said at the beginning that all loss of life was wrong - on both sides.
4. As the Palestinians are hostages themselves in Gaza , it is difficult to say " we condemn Hamas " because at the same time it is their RIGHT under International Law TO violently resist when passive resistance has failed.
That is a very difficult spot to be in.
5. So she is not approving of Hamas and Hamas had not been voted for since 2006, BUT she is saying " we have a Right to Defend our Human Rights of Freedom and that is ONLY because International Law has been flouted ie there should not be any occupation of Gaza or Wrst Bank
So remove the occupation, removes the cause of violence.
But Israel won't do that because it WANTS violence and an excuse to wipe out all Palestinians in that area and expand its borders.
The UN and NATO are actually helping Israel to do that by IGNORING International Law and not enforcing it through sanctions.
You cannot victimise people and put them in an Apartheid situation and expect them to be happy and not rebel.
Israel and Israelis would not accept such , so why should Palestinians ?