Why the US is Sending Its Aircraft Carriers to CHINA'S Doorstep and Other Geopolitics (Compilation)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 5 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 96

  • @Wumao50centparty
    @Wumao50centparty 4 місяці тому +38

    FREE Tibet
    FREE Inner Mongolia
    FREE Xinjiang/East Turkistan
    FREE Northern Vietnam and Parcels islands
    FREE Manchuria
    FREE Hong Kong
    FREE the stolen borderlands of India
    FREE the good people of China
    FREE Falon Gong
    FREE the Uyghurs
    FREE UA-cam from CCP'S Influence
    FREE Taiwan
    FREE West Philippines Sea and Indo PACIFIC

    • @HoehingTan
      @HoehingTan 4 місяці тому +3

      China please FREE the homelessness in US first.

    • @roastertruck
      @roastertruck 4 місяці тому +5

      ​@@HoehingTan bring them to the ghost cities in China. Oh wait, those tofu buildings won't last.

    • @Antiquated-Ether
      @Antiquated-Ether 4 місяці тому +2

      Im pretty sure china has more vacant buildings we can give the homeless to china​@@HoehingTan

    • @Fleshox19-uz3qt
      @Fleshox19-uz3qt 4 місяці тому

      ​@@HoehingTanChina needs to pay their citizens. How can you support a government that would allow their citizens to be paid for their labour?
      Shameless behaviour from an immoral government, wouldn't you rather see a decoupling from such a government?

  • @blainesitter9110
    @blainesitter9110 4 місяці тому +5

    Subic Bay , Bringing it back

  • @ZoomZoomMX3
    @ZoomZoomMX3 4 місяці тому +1

    The Chinese red Army did not fight the Japanese in more than 3 battles.
    They sat back letting what became Taiwan do all the work with the what became NATO allies.
    PLA did next to nothing to fight the Japanese in WW2.

  • @MultiDraino
    @MultiDraino 4 місяці тому +1

    Is this the narrator from infographics show?

    • @bazookajoe6133
      @bazookajoe6133 4 місяці тому

      This is his other channel. It's strictly about politics thoughm

  • @EricSchafer-b1k
    @EricSchafer-b1k 4 місяці тому +1

    Do we think 2 carrier task forces is a sufficient force in a potential fight with China? So why not practice with 5 carrier groups in a lose over lapping mega fleet? Will the carrier fleets be augmented with lasers to harden them. Maybe integrate Dragon Fire enhancements? Will carriers employ fighter cover designed to shoot down missile and drones (maybe not the hypersonic missiles)?
    Why not sell alot of Patriot and THAD batteries to Taiwan. Then sell alot of anti-ship missiles to Taiwan? This assumes Taiwan actually buys them rather than US funding for them to buy using our funds.

    • @bazookajoe6133
      @bazookajoe6133 4 місяці тому

      It's just a show of force. China would still have a hard time just dealing with that, let alone 5.

    • @ZoomZoomMX3
      @ZoomZoomMX3 4 місяці тому

      Why USA has 11 send them all and the 9 other hard top boats that can also launch F35s

  • @funveeable
    @funveeable 4 місяці тому +2

    A good president can Saber rattle and not have to deploy his troops. A bad president actually needs to deploy his troops.

    • @EarCandyPisces
      @EarCandyPisces 4 місяці тому

      No. It depends on the time and the leaders of other nations. A good president will adjust his actions to match modern day context as such.

    • @oldernu1250
      @oldernu1250 4 місяці тому

      No. Right word, right time--but never rely on words unless you think "Don't stop" works.

  • @dreamingflurry2729
    @dreamingflurry2729 4 місяці тому +11

    Funny! I still think the US would dominate the PLAN (because despite the name: The Chinese don't have a plan! Hell, the Chinese haven't ever fought a large naval battle! Their ships might look modern, but 90% of their hardware is based on Soviet-Era stuff that they've copied and tried their best to modernize (while still being unable to fully understand/copy some of it! For example, their Shenyang J-15 carrier-aircraft is based on a Soviet-Design (the SU-35 if I remember correctly!), but the Chinese are unable to copy the engine well enough, which leads to the (rather heavy aircraft) lacking the thrust the original aircraft has, so it can't launch with both full fuel and a full weapons load! It's either one or the other!)

    • @gemgChen
      @gemgChen 4 місяці тому +2

      1 VS 17 you need to check on the history first that can save many words.

    • @DauthEldrvaria
      @DauthEldrvaria 4 місяці тому

      ​@@gemgChenWow you got one thing to fact check about. That it? 😂😂

    • @saisirvous7363
      @saisirvous7363 4 місяці тому

      You can believe what you want to believe

    • @Tonyinthephilippines
      @Tonyinthephilippines 4 місяці тому

      China is teaming up with other countries

    • @easternrazor3749
      @easternrazor3749 4 місяці тому +1

      Wow ...and the US fought so many wars....but lost most of them!!!
      They can't even stop them Houthis.
      Sorry what did you say about PLAN?

  • @Southernstar-RINO
    @Southernstar-RINO 3 місяці тому

    Mexico is a beautiful country. Beautiful people. 🌮

  • @willwozniak2826
    @willwozniak2826 4 місяці тому

    CVN 70, 72 and 73 are F 35C capable...CVN 71 and 77 are next it looks like, along with CVN 79....CVN 78 should be 2025.

  • @rawanmagdy6519
    @rawanmagdy6519 4 місяці тому +1

    Hey can you make a video about the Nazi German ratte vs the modern day m1 abrams tank

    • @panavgaming1050
      @panavgaming1050 4 місяці тому

      In short if the abrams is in range the ratte will win

  • @EricSchafer-b1k
    @EricSchafer-b1k 4 місяці тому +1

    Will the US generate dual nuclear reactor destroyers?

  • @Tom-m8g3r
    @Tom-m8g3r 4 місяці тому +1

    Even if they didn't fight over Taiwan, jinping is still hell bent on bringing America to its knees anyway. So either way the world has got to get rid of jinping if you don't want to fight

    • @omnigeek
      @omnigeek 4 місяці тому +1

      Being hell bent on doing something and being capable of doing it are 2 completely different things

  • @Drop0sauce
    @Drop0sauce 4 місяці тому +1

    Nuclear weapons entered the chat

  • @DauthEldrvaria
    @DauthEldrvaria 4 місяці тому +1

    USA ! USA! USA!

  • @Tom-m8g3r
    @Tom-m8g3r 4 місяці тому

    If they're never going to use their militarys, they could put all their money into something else and be boring

  • @ssark9187
    @ssark9187 4 місяці тому +1

    Who has the time to watch this entire video?

    • @Istandby666
      @Istandby666 4 місяці тому

      You'd be surprised

    • @wporeo2595
      @wporeo2595 4 місяці тому

      I watch it while I go to bed lol

    • @robertlau8721
      @robertlau8721 4 місяці тому +3

      I listen to some of these while working. Passes the time nicely

    • @Theprimaryfocus
      @Theprimaryfocus 4 місяці тому

      Truck drivers

  • @Iamwell1974
    @Iamwell1974 4 місяці тому +1

    i hope china can stop the falling steel pole😂😂😂

  • @rodgerpiercearchitect
    @rodgerpiercearchitect 4 місяці тому

    …ball of confusion

  • @DauthEldrvaria
    @DauthEldrvaria 4 місяці тому

    So much of the world was ruined centuries ago by terrble people...

  • @dreamingflurry2729
    @dreamingflurry2729 4 місяці тому +1

    As if the US wouldn't track those LOUD boomers (submariner slang for an SLBM-Sub)...they have 6? The US has dozens of hunter-killer-subs, which would track boomers as soon as hostilities start (hell, they often do it in peace time, too - hell, it was a bit of a sport against the Soviets and their subs were better than the Chinese subs!)

  • @AdrianCHOY
    @AdrianCHOY 4 місяці тому

    If it sends 50% for such conflicts, USA pretty much lost.

    • @bazookajoe6133
      @bazookajoe6133 4 місяці тому

      US has 20% of their navy in or around Taiwan. China doesn't even know what to do with that. Imagine 50% of the Navy parked outside, lmao.

    • @omnigeek
      @omnigeek 4 місяці тому

      Why? Seriously, explain why. What about China’s military makes it twice as strong as the USA? The number of ships, planes, soldiers, etc. that they have? Their training? Their experience?

    • @AdrianCHOY
      @AdrianCHOY 4 місяці тому

      @@omnigeek Their main weakness is their honour. I sure hope they wouldn’t let that cripple them.

    • @Fuller.Family.Channel
      @Fuller.Family.Channel 4 місяці тому

      Tofu dreg houses... what about tofu dreg boats, planes, guns, and rockets do we need to worry about?

    • @AdrianCHOY
      @AdrianCHOY 4 місяці тому

      @@Fuller.Family.Channel have u been to China? Or u have been reading these from social media?

  • @Istandby666
    @Istandby666 4 місяці тому

    @3:58
    There's F-22's on a carrier....rofl

    • @ObtuseGoose2
      @ObtuseGoose2 4 місяці тому

      It’s an animation…. rOfL

  • @jeffreyzervos6938
    @jeffreyzervos6938 3 місяці тому

    I don't think there will be a war with china. China is so far behind in experience leadership organization and quality yeah they have quanity but they will not be able to break out of the first island chain. Also if you include Britain, Japan, India and others chinese shipping would cease to exist excwpt in central asia.

  • @MDruheITaIukdar
    @MDruheITaIukdar 4 місяці тому +1

    🌏💮🎇💠🇨🇳....China🤝🏻Bangladesh..🇧🇩❇️🌼🌻🏵️

  • @ogrexy5351
    @ogrexy5351 3 місяці тому

    What if they emp them
    Boys?

  • @howlinblues
    @howlinblues 4 місяці тому +1

    NZ Fiji Tonga are mighty Force To ?

  • @kevinkk8113
    @kevinkk8113 2 місяці тому

    Stop genocide in Gaza

  • @josephkelly4893
    @josephkelly4893 4 місяці тому

    I don’t see the practical use of aircraft carriers any more, if a huge UAV fleet was sent at a carrier it would be out of action pretty quick , I feel it’s a different time if a real war broke out

  • @HailTheApocalypse
    @HailTheApocalypse 4 місяці тому

    We need a little bit of Mao in the US

  • @quantumcomata105
    @quantumcomata105 4 місяці тому

    📺🐛🍎

  • @ptjones923
    @ptjones923 4 місяці тому

    Dragon want taste fury of Eagle.

  • @meirionowen5979
    @meirionowen5979 4 місяці тому +1

    You miss the important question - - - why does the US think Taiwan is any of its business?

    • @brightlord-ov7cm
      @brightlord-ov7cm 4 місяці тому +1

      Because we have businesses in Taiwan and we have a defense pact with them....

    • @bazookajoe6133
      @bazookajoe6133 4 місяці тому

      If you don't know the reason why, you need to stop replying to political/military videos because you don't go have a clue. 😂

    • @Fuller.Family.Channel
      @Fuller.Family.Channel 4 місяці тому

      Because Taiwan asked the US to make it our business... if they wanted to defect to China they totally could... they clearly don't want to, thus they asked for help...

  • @ericccchua5797
    @ericccchua5797 4 місяці тому

    Stay sober...😂😂😂 China is not iraq. Bet you us aitcraft carrier will avoid 2500km range of tf41missles😂😂😂

    • @brightlord-ov7cm
      @brightlord-ov7cm 4 місяці тому

      As long as China fights a completely conventional war, The US will have nothing to fear or worry about.

  • @HoehingTan
    @HoehingTan 4 місяці тому

    Why US is sending ta military forces everywhere? The simple answer is US is asking for war everywhere.🤣🤣

    • @primitivestudio1
      @primitivestudio1 4 місяці тому +3

      Not really. You don’t understand USA. What we want is freedom of movement for trade be it freedom of seas and over land.

    • @primitivestudio1
      @primitivestudio1 4 місяці тому +1

      Not really. You don’t understand USA. What we want is freedom of movement for trade be it freedom of seas and over land.

    • @pv2639
      @pv2639 4 місяці тому +1

      Good thing real life is not limited to simplistic views.

    • @leesutton3167
      @leesutton3167 4 місяці тому +4

      Because china is playing the f around and find out challenge. 😂😂😂

    • @bayafrica5909
      @bayafrica5909 4 місяці тому +2

      Open your eyes, China has been claiming ownership of the entire ASEAN waters which is a violation of UN Convention Law of Seas. It's China that is invading neighbors then why blame US?

  • @aiclun
    @aiclun 3 місяці тому

    坦率地說。
    美國應該少管閒事!將注意力放在美國內,對美國更好!
    美国对华情报解密档案(1948-1976) 第四卷.PDF