Alzofon Antigravity Experiment Test Setup
Вставка
- Опубліковано 15 жов 2024
- Here at Falcon Space we make it a point to replicate our experiments with high accuracy and repeatability.
This is an overview of our current replication of the Alzofon Experiment based on the work on Fredrick E. Alzofon's peer reviewed paper, Anti-Gravity with Present Technology, which is linked below.
Currently we are looking for help with our microwave waveguide design to maximize the 20 watt amplifier's output and concentrate it all into the sample.
We are very much looking for your input on our experimental setup and waveguide, so please leave a comment, We actually read them !
We are using the following equipment for this experiment:
*HP 8593E signal Analyzer
*RIgol DS1102E Digital Oscilloscope
*FMI 399G Signal Generator with pulse capability
*Electron Dynamics Division TWT 1277H X BAND Amplifier
*Zhaoxin KXN-1550D Power Supply (modified)
*Fluke 18b+ Digital Multi-meter
*Custom made Shunt
*MPS Analog Gauss-meter
*TD8620 Digital Gauss-meter (probe is currently broken)
*WT10A Digital Gauss-meter
*Nidage Spy camera
*Vernier USB force meter connected to a macbook
*Various custom made parts that accurately replicate the conditions described in the Paper.
link to Alzofon Paper:
www.tuks.nl/pdf...
To help our efforts, Donate here:
www.gofundme.c...
Hey guys, I know I'm late to the party, but I really respect the work you put into this. Keep up your research!
The party is on 11/12-11/14 in Hawthorne NJ. Your welcome to come.
@@FalconSpace Oh boy, thanks for the invitation! But that's a looong way from Germany...! :)
Several years ago, a video was shut down after 1 month. It was dealing
with demonstration of thermocouple / thermopile that slightly loses
weight when activated, and also on sensitive digital weigh scale. Heat
must be released away from mass so as not expanding air pressure under
unit in test pushing upward . (upside down) The word "correlation"
describes other experimenters who successfully aborted gravity with
their specialized set ups using matched metals according to ratios of
properties. See 1800's work of John W. Keely with his "transmitters" as
in series junctions of silver, gold, and platinum thermopiles as
tested for gravity control with his array of tuning forks vibrators.
The nodes junctions multiplied the frequencies even higher causing
dissonance to normal orderly gravity waves. A french scientist also
lifted an open frame dirigible with sandwich plates at either end hooked
to frequency transmitter. (translated from french) It seems there are
other ways to disrupt gravity waves affecting mass..
The 8620 is good but there are a couple of different grades you can get(I have the 1% accuracy but it's 100$ more than the basic version) .They should also reimburse you for damages since the hall sensor should have the cover on it but yeah, I would stay away from the analog one too.
we just sent it back and got a new 8620,
where can we get the 1% accuracy version?
@@FalconSpace Iwww.amazon.com/Portable-Gaussmeter-Magnetic-Accuracy-Conversion/dp/B07P8L8T35 , I believe it's the 1%
where can we get the 1% setup?
Nice job guys!
Nice job! Thanks for papers in the description. I started to read it but it's very complex to me at the moment ;) I wonder if using gas or fluid would not be interesting in this experiment. Something like mercury, but be carefull with its fumes it damages nervous system.
The best "fluid" is the Æther itself.
Nice job guys! Well constructed. That last horn you showed looks fine to me, but you need a way to measure the intensity of microwaves "at" the sample.
How can we do that?
The antenna simply wont fit.
@@FalconSpace make a small loop of wire that will fit. Any coil can be used as a magnetic field detector. If you want to make it more sensitive, it needs to be sized to resonate at 9.25 ghz, which can be tested simply by charging the coil with a current, then remove the source and measure the ringing frequency. The coil's inherent interwinding capacitance should be enough, just add more turns until you get the desired frequency.
@@Greg_Chase We don't need the spins to be aligned either way. We just need them to precess such that in one direction the frequency increases and in the other direction the frequency decreases.
@@Greg_Chase In the presentation I said that, in order to create acceleration, there needs to be a gradient in the scalar magnetic flux (SMF) density. This is what causes the frequency shift, according to the gyromagnetic ratio times the SMF density. The direction of spin is irrelevant, only the intensity of "instantaneous" flux coupled to each particle is important, not the average intensity. Preferably, to mimic gravity, the average intensity is zero, but at the scale of sub-atomic particles it is large. However, if only the hull responds, then objects and people inside will feel the acceleration, just like a car or a jet. It is only when the majority of all matter inside the hull too can be coupled to the field, then everything is accelerate uniformly and we'll have geodesic motion like a real Alcubierre warp drive.
@@Greg_Chase I'm sorry, this reads like word salad. "hard acceleration"? " 32.2 ft/sec^2 acceleration in *open space* would result in inertia."? These statements make no sense. Please use textbook terminology so people can understand you.
Did you guys have conducted any new experiment ?
Nice presentation!
I'm not sure the lever setup is a good idea. There is 24 inches i think between points. So i think it may not be the best. If you can't have the scale over the sample . Try redirecting with pulleys .
If you guys achive gravity control will you make a prototype craft
Sure! Never gonna happen
Yeah !
What experiments do you have on gyroscopes ..I'm a new fan of your channel and work for AAG
Hey Faraniko.
You work for AAG ?
You mean tim ventura ?
Tim ventura is working with me on APEC.
@Falcon Space Program
I see you have a sample that has iron in it loosely hanging in between the magnets. Wouldn't the sample be then attracted to on side of the magnetic coil field gap it is in? That would in effect press it against on side of the apparatus and stop your measurement from being detected or very weakly, wouldn't it? Also I heard nmr style devices need odd numbered nuclei, of wich aluminium and copper is but iron isn't or can the nuetrons space out the protons enough for a net spin to occur? Will you ever bolt the sample directly to the apart us and weigh the whole thing as one drive unit?, provided you have bigger samples of the effect is weak? Also lastly should any of your iron containing samples move upward (while not being attracted to one of the electromagnets) wouldn't the slight movement up Change the main magnetic fields path slightly and contribute to the detected upward force? Thanks
you bring up good points that we addressed in our test setup. first of all their is only 3% iron by weight in the sample. but this was still an issue which is why we had to set up the sample holder the way it is with stabilizing rails to hold it at the center saddle point. watch again at the end when jerimiah explains how we overcame that issue.
@@FalconSpace I guess I missed that, so I will
@@FalconSpace thanks again, but what's your expectation on having higher or lower iron content in the samples? Either I dont Remember or it didn't come up yet
MobiusPrime 2035 with more iron the sample will be harder to center. As for weightloss i have no idea if itll increase or decrease anything.
@@FalconSpace cool, so we'll see. As for the precession of spins for atoms of uneven atomic number I kinda have an idea why it looks promising. That comes from my first year university chemistry classes and the extremeness of the speeds and classical densities of the fundemental particles in atoms. Realizing that when synchronized to spin in direction we should expect gravity waves and twisting effects etc. It also occurred to me that without laws of disorder all atoms would collapse immediately regardless of their tiny masses producing a weak gravity field Because they are so small, and turning fast on those scales that it makes up it etc. So it'll be interesting for sure. I'm also expecting there to be many ways to do the same thing so it's expected that many versions will come about.
Or a small one?
Excellent 👌
Great 👌😊
Thanks a lot 😊
A big one ?
Have you guys managed to replicate Alzofon's results or even beaten them yet?
Not yet. We are working on a new waveguide. The first one was WAY OFF
I don't understand most of what you said. But good luck.
what's your magnetic field in Teslas?
Doctor Hongo .3300
If you need you can achieve higher fields with neodymium permanent magnets and using a halbach configuration. You can achieve more than 1 Tesla.
Also if you need an homogeneous field you are far from it with that setup.
Doctor Hongo our gauss meters shows it has a pretty homogeneous field.
Doctor Hongo a halbach array is good for asymmetric magnetic fields. Not what we need here
Scoot over damnit !! Y’Hmmm… Does Falcon labs always lock their dumpsters?? Really?…not anybody hungry here so look the other way… oh ho ho ho ! ??? A perfect well… let me rub that clean first… ouch my elbow!!! Oh my oh my yes… some likes mayonnaise and someone doesn’t! Thanks for the rummage time unrumied but I’m chá Ching !! 5 mayonnaise packet larger ! Peace !!
This is all so stupid. Alzofon is not anti-gravity. Any apparent loss of weight is simply the effect of a classical electromagnetic force.
Im sure you know that because you tried the experiment yourself and have results that prove your theory. Because Otherwise you'd just be another Con-man crank looking to pat himself on the shoulder.