No American should need to know those details about fucking Haiti… they DO want to know why their city is being overtaken by Haitian immigrants who were specifically dumped into their community by the federal government whose duty is to protect their rights as citizens of the United States.
Don’t need to scream when the Republican so obviously has no idea what the democrat is talking about lol. You can see Walsh short circuiting when Ryan was schooling him on Haiti.
Depends on the context. Do they paint one race as superior/inferior to another? That’s racist. Are they pointing out a stereotype that fits more than it doesn’t? That’s not racist. “Racist” has lost a lot of its power since the left has worn out the insult to describe anything that is remotely triggering to them
Yeah, I agree 100% I was favorably impressed with this conversation, since people with differing views on racial issues were able to set down and have a constructive and civil dialogue, without a bunch of name-calling, straw-manning, etc. Both sides made some good points, and they found common ground on certain issues.... 10 or 20 years ago, something like this wouldn't have been especially remarkable, but sadly these days it's rather rare.
No, Matt Walsh was sneaking in disses of Matt Walsh. How can there be systemic-racism when when racism itself exists only in the secret hearts & minds of an individual. Matt Walsh is gaslighting Matt Walsh LOL
I don’t know about yall, but I just enjoyed the fact that 2 ppl who obviously disagree on a topic, were able to talk about it for 30 minutes and not degrade into yelling at each other. More of this please.
@@BobCassidy dude, I'm an isolationist, I'm 100% against that. But on culture war issues, the left are total clowns, as Matt perfectly demonstrated in his new film.
That's the most infuriating thing bc workers have no control over foreign policy and then we're forced to deal with it's consequences while the rich benefit from them. When we complain they call us racist.
@@RicardoGonzalez-bn5uu Not with Trump! How many wars were started under his administration? ZERO! Sorry! You lack knowledge on this issue. Brainwashed 🐑
Getting away from semantics, the real question should be "Regardless of whether you think it meets the definition of racist, do you think such behavior is still bad/harmful?" From what I've watched so far (just a few minutes) he would not say it is harmful, and I think that is enough to discredit anything else he'd have to say on the subject, given how he and his cronies reacted to 'white guy tacos.'
@@MDoorpsyif you hear a dude say he makes the plainest, most boring tacos, claim his spice tolerance is “black pepper”, and yet he created a recipe that won a spicy taco cooking contest, then that person is full of garbage, and given Tim Walz’s track record with lying about himself, I think it should be scrutinized. Why would he lie to make himself look more plain and uncultured than a mayonnaise sandwich on white bread? It points to a major character flaw: he panders. Btw, his recipe was nothing like what he described to Kamala.
@@MDoorpsyalso, isn’t it cultural appropriation to attach race to an ethnic dish? I thought ppl on the left said white people arent allowed to make things their own or experience the creations and culture of other ethnicities and nationalities?
@@redmed10 well only works for people who call themselves jews. When it comes to arabs or palestinians it falls apart. Even though historical jews are more closer to palestinians than Israelis and European jews. Which makes the whole ordeal hilarious.
Can't really say that Matt is an adult when he either has a totally superficial understanding about how the world actually works or deliberately ignores context to demonize certain groups of people.
@@marlock6573 Can't really say that Ryan is an adult when he either has a totally superficial understanding about how the world actually works or deliberately ignores context to demonize certain groups of people, whites and men in particular.
@@marlock6573he didn’t demonize anybody… he just acknowledges that a lot of the Haitians coming over are used to how it is in Haiti, and treating the US like Haiti makes the US a worse place
You're comparing a man who ADMITTEDLY set out to eradicate certain rªces he deemed inferior and another murderer who CONFESSED to deleting 30 w0mən to someone who made jokes that are based on stereotypes. In the former, their positions have been adequately ascertained (from the horse's mouth and also deduced from the evidence of their evil actions). So how else could you ascertain the position of the lady in question without hearing her voice it out? As far as we can tell, she hasn't committed any rªc¡st acts against another person. If you guys would like to conclude that everyone who has used stereotypes while they addressed other races is automatically rªc¡st, then you're not very bright. Too many willfully ¡gn0rant people online exhibiting their intellectual bankruptcy.
@@raynwolfsbane2084Your argument only works if the analogy corresponds accurately to your comparison. Ted Bundy is not a good analogy for comparison to Laura Loomer because he had a litany of evidence against him proving that he was a serial killer. Laura Loomer does not have the same kind of evidence that can be levied against her proving she is a racist. So, in an effort of good faith, Matt Walsh gives a benefit of a doubt to Laura Loomer.
The disconnect from a lot of the comments is that I can say that I am not racists and by saying so people say that is evidence that your racist?! Unbelievably how the Left can hold to this rationalization! LOL.
I rarely comment on youtube and i have been a member for over 16 years, I am commenting simply becasue Ryan handled this interview/discussion with such class, and wisdom with the way calm manner i which he spoke while presenting facts, breaking down and explainng integral parts of the conversation in addition to showing dignity - that truly impressed me.
That was a master class of how we as a society on how to deal with people like Matt Walsh. Ryan Grim just proved that a person can be ignorant and malicious even when presenting how their ignorance helps create the problem and having a bias to "accept it" like Matt does. Ryan Grim is LIVING PROOF that a white person can be an open minded good hearted human being and give us a step in the right direction with out being condescending to the other person of their same race. This is what Dr King and Jane Elliot talking about all the time. This video was amazing. And as a black man I am proud that the majority of people in America are like Ryan Grim. At least the discussion is on the right side or morality.
He presented facts really? Couldn't name one study of mortgage discrimination. We are all to assume that what he says is in fact evidence given his echo chamber. Then he says implicit bias which requires no verification or validation. Get Real kid!
@@craigmatthews4517 Look up Bernard Garrett case in 1954. Also currently there is a class action lawsuit with Wells Fargo going on right now it was filed back in 2018 for unfair interest rates. That should help you out with ones you are unfamiliar with
@@craigmatthews4517what about the facts about the west still punishing Haiti 200 years later for being one of the first colonies to gain their independence?
I honestly found it a good discussion, with genuine back-and-forth happening between Ryan and Matt on their disagreements on how policies are construed as racist. You can disagree with either side, but they had this talk about meaningful issues without getting upset, name-calling, or refusing to talk to one another. And that's what we need to see more of in media.
They did have a civil back and forth, sure. I think that is dwarfed by the fact that at the end of the day Matt Walsh is a deeply unserious person who lies, grifts gaslights and straw-mans on a daily basis.
Ryan basically asked what's in it for the participants. These are the "omnipotent moral busybodies". CS Lewis answered that question before these particular people even existed. "Of all the tyrannies, a tyranny exercised for the good of its victims may may be the most oppressive. It may be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end, for they do so with the approval of their consciences." -- C.S. Lewis
I have used that same quote multiple times too. Thanks. Fits perfectly here Here is the full quote: “Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, and his cupidity may at some point be satiated, but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience. They may be more likely to go to Heaven yet at the same time likelier to make a Hell of Earth. This very kindness stings with intolerable insult. To be "cured" against one's will and cured of states which we may not regard as disease is to be put on a level of those who have not yet reached the age of reason or those who never will; to be classed with infants, imbeciles, and domestic animals.” ― C.S. Lewis
@@M_Pross Here is the full quote: “Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, and his cupidity may at some point be satiated, but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience. They may be more likely to go to Heaven yet at the same time likelier to make a Hell of Earth. This very kindness stings with intolerable insult. To be "cured" against one's will and cured of states which we may not regard as disease is to be put on a level of those who have not yet reached the age of reason or those who never will; to be classed with infants, imbeciles, and domestic animals.” ― C.S. Lewis
@@M_Pross I'm a straight, white man. They're already going to make that accusation. I just don't care. I just roll with it. If someone says that about me, I'll say something in my limited German vocabulary or make a comment on their ignorance.
@@blackerpanther3329 LMFAO yea right, ALL his ideas ALL the time. It's not that he just talks to the camera based on his own feelings for an hour and doesn't do any research
I’ve worked in the mortgage industry on and off for 20 years. The comments on mortgage rates for black families being any different is just BOGUS. It may be true that black families on average have lower credit scores… or maybe black famines will accept fewer approvals vs shopping for the very best rates… But all else being equal the rate sheets don’t care.
Black people are rejected more often for mortgage loans and are pushed into subprime mortgages. If they do manage to buy homes those home are appraised at lower values simply because someone black owns the home.
Thank you! I had this discussion with my mom recently. I said, “so you’re telling me that a loan officer, who is commission driven and doesn’t care who lives where so long as they get the commission for a purchase, is SO racist that they’ll forego the commission on a $1,000,000+ purchase because they don’t like black people? That they’ll RISK not being able to take care of their family because they so staunchly don’t want them to live there?” And she looked at me and said “yes”. That people are so racist that they’d rather not feed their families. And that’s when I knew she had gone off the deep end. People are too selfish to be racist over their own self interests (besides the WNBA but that’s a topic for another day).
So according to matt walsh, the only way we can tell if something or someone is racist is if they themselves identify as racist, But he complains abt "anti-white racism" all the time on his show
But the people he accuses of "anti-white racism" are quite literally saying that ALL WHITE PEOPLE ARE EVIL!!! So they very much DO identify themselves as racist!
Transwoman: a woman is anyone who believes they're a woman. Matt Walsh: Words already have definitions. What gives you the right to re-define a word? Also Matt Walsh: I have a new definition of racism and it has everything to do with intent.
@@11Garrett11 Which not a single person in history ever sincerely did. Also one would assume that people are capable of seeing the difference between a woman and a toaster oven, but apparently you don't
@bigredneck789 terrible strawman.. everything isn't racist and people that understand the subject never claimed that. Your side thinks that because you don't understand the subject and you probably do a lot of racist things
Yeah, if they use racist criteria to disparage and disadvantage other races, they are acting and therefore being racist even if it's not part of their beliefs.
Notice how Matt had to concede the point at the end but then said it was "classism" not "racism". What an obvious reach so that he doesn't have to admit he's wrong, LOL.
@@lovromusec8636 Exactly. It is classism. Ask a poor white family in Appalachia if they can get a loan with low interest rates. Ryan HAS to see racism in everything or else his worldview crumbles, and that would be devastating to him. Everyone he disagrees with HAS to be racist, and he'll use all kinds of "red herring" argument tactics to confuse his opponent in order to reinforce the projection he's putting out and making people responsible for. He is living out Robin DiAngelo's principle of, "it's not the question 'did racism occur', but rather, 'how did racism manifest itself in this situation'?"
He was hell bent on proving his point but lacked facts or specific policies to support it. This is the real source of division in the US; instead of focusing on facts and finding solutions, people keep debating racism, racism, racism, which is such a waste of time.
Yeah Matt, you dingus. Haitian people have little to no influence on the trajectory of their government. That’s like asking if Medieval peasants had any influence on the orders of the King.
@@damon6086 But then NO people in the world are responsible for the conditions they live in, because direct democracy is not really instituted anywhere. So USA is doing better than Sudan because the 0.01% of Americans who have had real influence on the "trajectory of US government", have been so much better at it than the corresponding ruling class in Sudan? Nothing to do with the genius of individual Americans, the spirit and attitude of American workers? The common people have nothing to do with the success of their country?
@@janisauzins4103 You're talking about a different kind of influence. The OP is talking about influence as in swaying the government towards the people. Those 0.1% aren't us. They're the ruling class who pays our government to screw poor people.
I don't think he was crying racism, I think he was pointing out the double standard. If he said another color besides white, a certain portion of the online community would be crying racism
That analogy is time-sensitive. If you have decades to rebuild, are left alone to do it, and never do.....what does that say about you? What if the house wasn't built by the occupants in the first place? What if they only inherited it? What if they are incapable of building their own house, for whatever reason? So many questions, so little time.
Nice try trololol. Trying to rage bait saying it's "time sensivitive" when ryan brought up the point in the video that the US has overthrown the Haitian government in just 2021. Decades to rebuild my ass, troll
@@bbainter7880 The problem is (as Ryan shows) it's multiple things done over the decades and not one thing done one time decades ago... How can you judge "if they are incapable of building their own house" when the latest destruction was 3 years ago?
The left did that when they tried to say things like, “Black people can’t be racist because of power dynamics,” while not realizing how racist they actually sound when they say garbage like that.
Ryan was so uncomfortable when he started talkin about bad Asian drivers. He looked at Emily, who was having a blast, like, are we really talking about this on this channel right now?
But Walsh isn't saying there's no racism. His movie isn't about denying racism, it's about exposing millionaire "anti-racism" grifters like Robin DeAngelo.
Conservatives who consider themselves "America First" should absolutely be more aware and focused on the U.S. governemt foreign policy which intentionally destroys other countries around the world. Immigration wouldnt be at such a staggering rate if it werent for constant meddling around the world.
I consider myself America First. That doesn’t mean I’m anti interventionist. I believe in policies that focus on Americans. If destabilizing another nation is in Americas interest then so be it. The Ukraine imo isn’t in Americas interests.
@@luisalejandro2335then you can't complain about immigration. That destabilizing other nations is the root cause of it. If you are for destabilizing other countries, than you are for immigration.
Late to the comments, but NOBODY talked about Matt Walsh's movie that exposes the anti white left wing racism of Hollywood/Democrats ideology. But lots of people want to cry about Haiti.
I agree these Haiti comments are hurting my soul, but at the same time there wasn’t much to talk about from the movie because it seemed both parties totally agreed that the race hustling stuff from the movie was ridiculous
Idk how you can posit that systemic racism doesn't exist anymore without understanding how systemic classism has been used for the purpose of discriminating on a racial basis.
This is just word salad slightly more intelligent than the word salad that comes out of Kamala’s mouth. If anything systemic classism would hurt white people more because the country was basically all white.
Thank you to Breaking Points for having oppositional guests. It has been a while since I tuned in but I will more often if this kind of constructive conversations happen more often.
One of the advantages of having two hosts with sometimes opposing viewpoints is that it makes it more likely for the Giedt to be oppositional to at least one of them
I am South Asian. I found it hilarious because they are true stereotypes of my people.....once you stop the victim hood mentality the world becomes a funnier place.
Most of them practice Vodou together with Christianity which makes them not much of Christians. But with failing education system it is probably hard to judge them for limited comprehension of Catholic teachings, etc. From Wiki: "An often used joke about Haiti holds that the island's population is 85% Roman Catholic, 15% Protestant, and 100% Vodou."
@@reginalannister2262 I do not see any claim on Wiki that it is “all” or “most”. I only seen “many” or “small amount”. “Whereas a very small amount of Catholic Haitians combine their faith with aspects if Vodou, this practice is much more rare among Haitian Protestants, whose churches tend to strongly denounce Vodou as diabolical”. Under the article Christianity in Haiti.
The prison system wasn't created to be sexist. But male prisoners far outnumber women prisoners. Therefore, the prison system is sexist. That's Ryan's reasoning.
To better perfect your analogy the way that he would use it is saying that prison was created to place men in prison but down the line they had started to allow women to also become inmates and just because the women are now going to jail along with the men it doesn't mean that the effect or the intention behind the jail has changed it's only expanded So instead of injustice being done on black people it's now being done on all people in America and that's the claim that's being made is that we're all equal now so the system is no longer racist. The point that Ryan is making is that even though the system now has laws in place against that the effects of what was put in place in the beginning are still having an echo within the psychology and the actions of those people that those laws were put on against. So in a sense the system is still racist in the fact that the effect of its original racist intention is still having a causality within the people of color today. And Matt does not want to acknowledge that.
Always question the systems around you, even if you think it's stupid and the conclusion is self-evident. Maybe the reason more men are in prison is simply because men are inherently more likely to commit crimes, but correlation is not the same as causation and maybe there's some other factor at play. Prisons probably aren't sexist, but that doesn't mean we don't have other societal issues pushing more men towards behavior that gets them locked up. It doesn't mean men are inherently prone to violent crimes. The point isn't to make blanket statements about prisons being racist or sexist, it's about identifying why patterns exist to see if we can actually do something about it.
@@squiddler7731completely delusional comment. Androgenic effects of Testosterone include aggression. Female bodybuilders have confirmed this. Androgens don't only affect the body.
I despise Matt Walsh, and I understand Ryan’s instinct is to be diplomatic - which I usually appreciate - but I really think there could’ve been a lot more pushback from him, especially in regards to the other comments recalling the ‘white people tacos’ joke that Walsh called racist, which clearly wouldn’t meet the high bar he’s established for racism in this interview if he actually applied it consistently. Edit: ok I spoke a little too soon. The chill tone Ryan delivers with can be so powerful because it forces people like Matt to contend with the substance of what he’s saying instead of latching onto the tone of it or the emotions and then run with it like they won the argument because the other side got upsetty spaghetti. Though I still REALLY wish he’d had that tacos joke off the top of his head because that really would have destroyed Matt’s entire argument.
as long as you don't "feel" ill-will towards the person, it isn't racist. ROTF not laughing. He is saying if the person doesn't identify as racist, they are not racist... Sooo, he can tell us what a woman is but not a racist.
@@janisauzins4103 racism is a prejudice, discrimination against a race. It isn't ill-will. You can be a racist because you learned wrong. I knew a white teenager who literally thought black people had lesser intelligence...not because she had ill-will but because that is what she "learned" from her family environment. Way too often people want to require "ill-will" to define racism to excuse themselves of their "accidental" racism. Guess what? It's still racism with or without intent.
@@Lisa-z8w2bwrong. First off, the intelligence thing is a fact and it was studied thoroughly for decades. Not necessarily due to genetics but more cultural, parental issues. But its true. The average IQ for that group is 85. Second, ill will means bad intent. Saying someone is part of a group with lower IQ does not make one a racist. Just like saying that group is several times more likely to commit violence. Its simply being informed. These are problems white hill billies had way back and we shamed those people out of society. The problem is with the B community we have white liberals since the 60s propping up that bad behavior as "blck culture" so its off limits to shame it. So now you get new generations worshipping rappers and violence and the cycle will continue until its shamed by most of that community. Read some Thomas Sowell. He explains this thoroughly.
Yeah - I like Matt, but I don't see what's so funny about the waiter dropping the plates. I mean, I guess it really happened in real life, so there's the "cringe" moment, but I don't see how it connects to racism or anything at all
I love reading comments from progressives. You start to realize how easy it is to destroy their arguments like Matt did. By asking simple questions, and letting them respond.
Finally someone asked him if they also knew he was involved with the camera crew. I’ve been wanting that part answered but people just kept asking how they filmed it.
Let's appreciate how civil the overall discussion went. When Ryan brought his points on Haiti, Matt was humbled and he gracefully conceded. And during the systemic racism topic, Ryan was cornered by other two. Let's not get caught up in the argument that who is smarter, left or right. We all know the real enemy is uni-party. Kudos to all of them for having the conversation. Need more!
Ryan was not cornered what are you talking about. He got Matt Walsh to admit there might be systemic issues experienced by black people. But Matt Walsh tried to make the claim that systemic issues disproportionately affecting black people does not constitute racism because of a lack of intent, which is ridiculous. Please come down from cloud cuckoo land.
Lost me as soon as he said the tweet wasn't racist. I don't know how "people will only be able to convey their feedback through a customer satisfaction survey at the end of the call that nobody will understand" is not a reference to the stereotype that Indians have inferior English skills, and fully falls into Matt's own definition that things are racist when they question a person's intellectual capability solely on their race. Completely destroyed his own non-existent credibility in one answer.
“A lot of the United States adventurism and intervention in other countries has been unwise” This whitewashing of US failures, mistakes and atrocities is just ridiculous. The illusion of American exceptionalism puts blame on anyone or anything but the US.
I need to do that because video quit after the Walsh and Emily defined racism in their own white supremacist perspectives. Ryan was sitting quietly. Reading all these comments reveals I need to watch it.
There are laws that protect against discrimination based on race, so, if the cases this guy cites (the “widely accepted studies”) then there are lawsuits which would have followed.
can understand why Ryan never named one study on Mortgage discrimination. Ryan simply states that there are numerous studies that show racial discrimination in mortgage lending, but fails to provide a citation for one. He also admits that people will probably find fault in them which is true. I can see why he never gave one specific citation study as most research studies are false to begin with. HE WAS RELYING on people watching this not to check out the veracity and efficacy of the studies. I have looked at the various studies out there and Blacks do pay more, but each study does not ask the question as to whether they are justified in charging more. They simply state there is a discrepancy and that is evidence/proof enough of racial bias. In other words some of the researchers confabulate correlation = causation. See High-Income Black Homeowners Receive Higher Interest Rates than Low-Income White Homeowners Tuesday, February 16, 2021 | Raheem Hanifa. "While additional studies are needed to identify the specific causes of Black-white interest rate disparities, widespread racial discrimination in mortgage markets has played a role." They leave it at that but provide no evidence to link "racial discrimination in mortgage markets"?!? Additionally, the title is very misleading. It's unbelievable how disingenuous the author is. For example the difference within the same income range ($75K - $100k) is only .00085% or 8.5 % of 1%. Thats not even close to being statistically significant. The only significant difference is in the ($30K - $44999) range of income. I wish he had made his data available or point to his source so that one could determine the randomness and whether the study was under powered (e.g. not enough data to draw a conclusion). Might also suggest you read "Why Most Published Research Findings Are False" by John Ioannidis, a professor at the Stanford School of Medicine. It will open your eyes! Thomas Sowell succinctly puts, “Some things are believed because they are demonstrably true. But many other things are believed simply because they have been asserted repeatedly-and repetition has been accepted as a substitute for evidence.” You should also consider how Obama was involved in a suit against Citibank for discrimination in give Mortgages in Chicago. Of the 186 mortgages that were given only 19 of those still own the house with a clean credit rating. Thats ~ 90% failure rate. Many of the people who got the mortgages did not thank Obama as they had to go into bankruptcy too. See Buycks-Roberson v. Citibank Fed. Sav. Bank Investors Business Daily and MetroWest Daily News.
@@peachyjam9440 Really someone has to explain this to you? It's called gathering evidence (e.g. emails, correspondence, personnel files, depositions, witness testimony.....)
@@craigmatthews4517 I'm not asking in general, I'm asking specifically for this instance, how would you be able to prove in court the fault within an individual case if the studies take into account small data pools gathered from thousands of places in order to find a conclusion? Who is supposed to sue them if the researchers aren't real tenants? Who will have the money to fight in court?
@@Pineandfeather No. I'm not the standard. A ghoul is someone that supports ghoulish things. Some of those things include, but are not limited to: using 1800's era racism to justify 2020's racism, as if the lessons learned after the 1800's shouldn't be used to avoid pitfalls in the 2020's but rather expect and accept falling into them, over and over again. Another example would be listening to a crazed podcaster lie about the positions of a VP candidate, nodding along with the insanity, and when given a chance ADD to that instead of attempting to re-hinge the un-hinged.
@@Pineandfeather No. I'm not the standard. Do you have another, better question or is this a rhetorical exercise for you because you're upset I called out Saagar and Emily?
Matt Walsh is a perfect example of how speaking confidently will always convince some amount of people that what you are saying is reasonable/well thought out, even if what you are saying is totally and wholly ignorant to the facts of the matter.
I didn't see any ignorance. The lefty interviewer made a bunch of claims about Haiti. He doesn'took like a historical scholar to me. Did he provide PROOF that America is RESPONSIBLE for Haiti's 3rd world status for the past several decades? He never even explained why we muddled with their leaders (like maybe they were evil/corrupt). Also, that STILL wouldn't explain why we now have to accept thousands of Haitian migrants.
As an Asian American, I know through personal experience how a gated community had undisclosed preferences with regards to who could purchase a condo there: black people were the least favored, Latino and Asians were next, white people of European descent was the most favored. Racism does exist, it’s just more subtle and hidden. Progress has been made, but it will take time, through cultures blending and intermarrying or friendships that are diverse.
16:00 Typical conservative squirm when required to actually engage with historical context. Try to move on, try to straw man absolutes, etc. So easy to dismantle. Get used to this for the new era of conservatives passing the neocon torch to the DNC
After Ryan gave Walsh the history on Haiti, he should have asked him if he thought it was reasonable that some of those Haitians wanted to escape. And if he thinks that, being that the US and French governments have harmed Haiti, do these governments have a responsibility to rectify the situation? I like that Grim brought up the history, but he let Walsh pretend like he knew that history, and that he had already considered it, which seems unlikely
@@guadwin I’m not affiliated with a party. Neither of them show any interest in doing the will of the voters since corporations became people too. They’ve rigged it such they don’t need our votes to continue their agenda.
@@guadwin I’m not a part of a party. I’m an American citizen that stands with other American citizens. These people we elect are supposed to be our employees, and nothing more.
@@davidmortensen5709 It’s a totally uneducated “thought”. He didn’t even know about something existing, then a few seconds later casually muses like he understands the intent and origin.
@@daniel4815its a pretty safe assumption when talking with a leftist, if they think something is based on racism, it is not. I mean he's got a 10-1 shot.
It’s ok if you don’t have the best grasp on the English language. You can take classes for that with the Haitian immigrants in Springfield that are helping a town ravaged by opioids.
literally other way around. Last 10 minutes, this dude was slapped with so much undeniable facts of racism and systemic racism, so intelligently and elegantly... and all he could muster up was "I probably disagree with you" which is a ludicrous statement in itself and "oh it's class not race" which was an outright lie... you need to rewatch and take notes mate :D
Saying the White House will smell like curry and the call centre remark isn’t racist because we would have to ask her and take her word if she ‘hated’ people from India? That’s crazy to defend that
This title "confronted" is click bait. I thought he was very reasonable with his responses and Emily and Ryan conversed without agendas. Healthy discourse.
I’m glad to see Breaking Points decided to upload this self-own on their part. There was no feasible answer on the part of BP regarding “systemic racism”
@@joegalley2187 how is this a self own? They always have different debates and various opposing perspectives on this show, it’s not like they’re inherently a left show and so somehow sabotaged their viewpoint with this convo
Bro matt walsh got aggressively owned. Did you miss how he literally admitted at the end that if the studies are correct (and he himself seems to give good reasons as to why they could be correct) that black people get discriminated against disproportionately to white people on mortgage applications, because the banks see black names and make assumptions they wouldnt make were they to see white names? He literally admits that but then tries to make it entirely about class. A systemic issue that affects non-white people is systemic racism, regardless of the intent. You can't possibly have seen Matt Walsh fumble this hard and think he won.
Matt's right about Haiti. Folks forget that Haiti is only one half of an island, and the Dominican Republic that makes up the other half is doing relatively well. Thus, you have to ask yourself why these outside influences, like the American government as alleged, are somehow only making a mess of the one half. Secondly, for all the talk about outside influence in Haiti that ignores how the host is basically implying that it's "only fair" that the haitian be brought to the US since the US is somehow the bad guy, forgetting that what he's saying was bad in Haiti is exactly what he's supporting being done to the people of Springfield OH. Those people had no say, no notice, no care given at all. They woke up one morning and their entire region had been completely changed by "outsiders". Their relatively nice community was overrun with foreigners who don't speak the language, share the customs, or even have the education needed to seamlessly integrate into the culture. Who cares about them? By his own logic, he should be outraged over what was done with the people of Springfield, especially since it's his own country and could very well be his own neighborhood next up on the chopping block.
The thing I wish Ryan said is “if the inequalities are not systemic, do you think that Black people are just incapable of success, therefore inferior?”
That’s an obvious false dichotomy. Thinking people should know better than that. Many black people, both Americans and immigrants are quite successful. Because the rates at the “racial” group level aren’t equal doesn’t in any way indicate discrimination or inferiority anymore than Asians being at the top of the economic ladder indicates inherent inferiority of whites or discrimination against them. It’s obviously bad reasoning. There are many other very logical reasons for why that is or could be.
Could have Been an interesting interview about the MOVIE, but instead Ryan decided to run the interview off the tracks talking about specific policy issue BS that Matt had no specifics expertise in. I’m other words, he derailed an interview about an interesting movie to try to win an argument that no one was having except him. A truly sh*t job of taking an interesting guest who made a successful movie and talking about everything but the damn movie , which is what anyone who clicked on this video was expecting. Stick to writing, or learn how to stay on point and give watchers what they expect to hear from a Matt Walsh interview. The video should have been title “Ryan grills Matt Walsh over various issues that have absolutely nothing to do with the movie he made.”
The republicans don't understand that "systemic racism" is an analytic label rather than a moral condemnation of the individuals maintaining the systems. The system itself is racist and should be reformed, regardless of whether or not you can find a primary sinner.
Leftists literally control the system at every level and NONE of it helps white people in any way. We can go piece by piece or wholesale, I can destroy your entire worldview very easily either way.
What analysis though? How is it even measured, is it anecdotal or statistics driven? Statistics prove that people of Indian or Chinese heritage are by far the highest earners/wealthy demographic across the United States.
Race is not like being a man. Race is a stupid idea, it has more to do with culture and that is valid as far as it goes. What is REAL is family groups or family genetic groups.
It is intent... Thats the thing those who throw that word around keep forgetting. You could hate a person and say mean things to and about that person... But that doesn't mean you hate the person's race. Intent is a thing of the mind, and can be persieved by others based on a pattern of behavior. The problem now is that the woke has skipped over that "pattern of behavior" part and pick an isolated statement or event, ascribe their own intent to it with no idea what the actual motivation of the person involved is... And determine based on their preconceived ignorance that that 1 thing makes you racist
@@bruchepeasracism isn’t about hate, it’s about a feeling of superiority. I can feel superior to you and not hate you, but just think you are inherently lesser than me because of your race. I might be able to have pleasant conversations with people who I think are inherently lesser than me, and not harbor any personal animosity, but it’d still be racism Uc I thought you were inferior to me due to your skin color, right?
@@corvacopia Saying racism is about a feeling of superiority is quite an oversimplification. Racism is treating someone differently.... Or more accurately treating people negatively or discriminatory based upon their race, irrespective of the motivation, wether it be disdain, superiority /inferiority complex, personal bias or anything else. The common denominator here is that racism is an action based upon treating people as a collective instead of as individuals... But, how do you know that's what drives a person's actions when you are not in their head? This is the arrogance that people who throw that word around possess which pisses me off. The only way to judge a person as racist is either to have them admit it, or observe their pattern of behavior over a period of time, it cannot be determined based on a single action or idea a person expresses
@@bruchepeas we are what we repeatedly do. If someone repeatedly makes racist remarks about others, and choses to hurt them and cause harm to them with their speech, then that person is probably a racist because they have a pattern of racist behaviour.
Walsh was not prepared for this. Doesn't seem to have thought through his worldview. Doubt that will stop him from making money selling it though. Is it that different from the DEI consultants he admonishes? Grifters gonna grift. Clowns gonna clown.
You make an assertion ("Doesn't seem to have thought through his worldview") but provide no example of what you are talking about. Kind of a worthless comment. “The wise man speaks because he has something to say; the fool because he has to say something.” - Plato
![Lp. Сердце Вселенной #60 РОЖДЕНИЕ ЛОЛОЛОШКИ [Финал] • Майнкрафт](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/YoR0pAV9FVQ/mqdefault.jpg)
Ryan... you know damn well Matt knows none of those details on Haiti lmao
@@RGatGala 🤣🤣🤣
Ryan is to nice🤣
No American should need to know those details about fucking Haiti… they DO want to know why their city is being overtaken by Haitian immigrants who were specifically dumped into their community by the federal government whose duty is to protect their rights as citizens of the United States.
And you can tell Matt was squirming in his seat and in too deep at that point
@@MikeCoxlong_NOR Watch your grammar.
Nice to see a Democrat and a Republican not screaming at each other.
Don’t need to scream when the Republican so obviously has no idea what the democrat is talking about lol. You can see Walsh short circuiting when Ryan was schooling him on Haiti.
Using someone's race to insult them is pretty racist.
You only believe that when it goes one way haha
IT IS RACISM.
Hindus are Caucasian. look it up.
Depends on the context. Do they paint one race as superior/inferior to another? That’s racist. Are they pointing out a stereotype that fits more than it doesn’t? That’s not racist. “Racist” has lost a lot of its power since the left has worn out the insult to describe anything that is remotely triggering to them
LOL ... I'm having a hard time figuring out who you're talking about. Is it Loomer or the two lecturers from Walsh's documentary?
Kudos to Ryan, Emily and Matt. I love it when liberals and conservatives are able to have respectful, productive conversations.
Yeah, I agree 100%
I was favorably impressed with this conversation, since people with differing views on racial issues were able to set down and have a constructive and civil dialogue, without a bunch of name-calling, straw-manning, etc. Both sides made some good points, and they found common ground on certain issues....
10 or 20 years ago, something like this wouldn't have been especially remarkable, but sadly these days it's rather rare.
@@Bike_Lionit’s too bad Matt Walsh is 100% racist. I consulted a friend of mine who reads minds. I know Matt denies this but he lies.
No, Matt Walsh was sneaking in disses of Matt Walsh. How can there be systemic-racism when when racism itself exists only in the secret hearts & minds of an individual. Matt Walsh is gaslighting Matt Walsh LOL
I don’t know about yall, but I just enjoyed the fact that 2 ppl who obviously disagree on a topic, were able to talk about it for 30 minutes and not degrade into yelling at each other. More of this please.
Yea but at what cost . One person is providing context and facts and the other keeps saying they feel and think things so the facts don’t count
“But at what cost” Jesus Christ. Nothing! It cost nothing it’s a conversation! It costs less than a mouse fart. It’s free.
@carlozcabrera I agree. The conservative has facts and logic, and the lefty as usual, is all emotions
@@dudebro91-fn7rz You are clearly watching a different video or can't differentiate between facts and emotional response.
@@BobCassidy dude, I'm an isolationist, I'm 100% against that. But on culture war issues, the left are total clowns, as Matt perfectly demonstrated in his new film.
I am glad that it was pointed out how our own foreign policy helps create the conditions for mass immigration.
That's the most infuriating thing bc workers have no control over foreign policy and then we're forced to deal with it's consequences while the rich benefit from them. When we complain they call us racist.
Blame genocide Joe and Kamala.
@@jaws392and Reagan, Bush, Clinton, Bush, Obama, Trump, etc…this has been going on for decades
@@jaws392 How old are you.. 4? Haiti has been a mess for decades, with coups directly supported and enabled by our own government.
@@RicardoGonzalez-bn5uu Not with Trump! How many wars were started under his administration? ZERO! Sorry! You lack knowledge on this issue. Brainwashed 🐑
So if you treat a person in a particular way solely on the basis of their race, it’s not racist?
Getting away from semantics, the real question should be "Regardless of whether you think it meets the definition of racist, do you think such behavior is still bad/harmful?" From what I've watched so far (just a few minutes) he would not say it is harmful, and I think that is enough to discredit anything else he'd have to say on the subject, given how he and his cronies reacted to 'white guy tacos.'
Matt gets to decide what’s racist not victims
@@MDoorpsyif you hear a dude say he makes the plainest, most boring tacos, claim his spice tolerance is “black pepper”, and yet he created a recipe that won a spicy taco cooking contest, then that person is full of garbage, and given Tim Walz’s track record with lying about himself, I think it should be scrutinized. Why would he lie to make himself look more plain and uncultured than a mayonnaise sandwich on white bread? It points to a major character flaw: he panders.
Btw, his recipe was nothing like what he described to Kamala.
@@MDoorpsyalso, isn’t it cultural appropriation to attach race to an ethnic dish? I thought ppl on the left said white people arent allowed to make things their own or experience the creations and culture of other ethnicities and nationalities?
Welcome to the conservative land of vibes based reality.
I believe Matt don’t want to admit he wrong about the racist topic
Its not racist if my team does it.
more like... its not racist if my team does something racist but claims its not racist.....
The Democrats playbook
@@KevinHoekmanright wing accufession?
@@KevinHoekman bipartisan playbook, but very insightful comment there.
@@KevinHoekmanYeah please tell me the racist things you've seen democrats say.
Now do "Is It Anti-semetic?"
Lol that is a great idea…wonder how ben shapiro feel about that
Lol
The word is semitic not semetic. From the word semite.
Is it okay to criticize Ben Shapiro’s Pope hat?
@@redmed10 well only works for people who call themselves jews. When it comes to arabs or palestinians it falls apart. Even though historical jews are more closer to palestinians than Israelis and European jews. Which makes the whole ordeal hilarious.
Will the man from the Daily Wire say that negative stereo types of Jews should also be treated with nuance? Of course not!
^this
Got em!
Candace will agree with you.
Me Google who the bulshiviks actually where. Marx was a Jew. Communism is a Jewish ideology to implement control by financial institutions.
You don't know Matt, clearly
Can we just acknowledge this is how people who see things differently politely engage and have a conversation. Props to Matt and ryan
You mean asking a question then interrupting every 5 seconds?
No offense, and yes this is civil, but Matt isn't even intellectually curious about the topics he's bringing up. He just wants to talk about culture
@@matttrembley8584 agreed!
@@davidbranker2132 I don’t agree with Matt, but why do you say he’s not intellectually curious? Like he’s not willing to challenge his own beliefs?
"We investigated ourselves and found we are not racist"
Great comment 😂
? You just admitted you are a racist
Sounds like you identify yourself as racist? Not a good stance.
😂😂😂
Your comment makes no sense.
They had a dialogue?
We need more adult conversations like this.
Can't really say that Matt is an adult when he either has a totally superficial understanding about how the world actually works or deliberately ignores context to demonize certain groups of people.
Indeed, by applying simple critical thinking skills, one can deconstruct any bad argument.
@@marlock6573 Can't really say that Ryan is an adult when he either has a totally superficial understanding about how the world actually works or deliberately ignores context to demonize certain groups of people, whites and men in particular.
@@marlock6573he didn’t demonize anybody… he just acknowledges that a lot of the Haitians coming over are used to how it is in Haiti, and treating the US like Haiti makes the US a worse place
@@believeyoume-nj2mtholy shell are you a child?
Matt Walsh: "I would have to ask her if she is racist, and if she says 'no' I have to take her word for that."
I guess Ted Bundy wasn't a serial killer. He said he wasn't.
I would how to ask Hitler if he hated the jews, and if he said 'no' I have to take his word for it.
You're comparing a man who ADMITTEDLY set out to eradicate certain rªces he deemed inferior and another murderer who CONFESSED to deleting 30 w0mən to someone who made jokes that are based on stereotypes. In the former, their positions have been adequately ascertained (from the horse's mouth and also deduced from the evidence of their evil actions).
So how else could you ascertain the position of the lady in question without hearing her voice it out? As far as we can tell, she hasn't committed any rªc¡st acts against another person. If you guys would like to conclude that everyone who has used stereotypes while they addressed other races is automatically rªc¡st, then you're not very bright.
Too many willfully ¡gn0rant people online exhibiting their intellectual bankruptcy.
@@raynwolfsbane2084Your argument only works if the analogy corresponds accurately to your comparison.
Ted Bundy is not a good analogy for comparison to Laura Loomer because he had a litany of evidence against him proving that he was a serial killer. Laura Loomer does not have the same kind of evidence that can be levied against her proving she is a racist.
So, in an effort of good faith, Matt Walsh gives a benefit of a doubt to Laura Loomer.
The disconnect from a lot of the comments is that I can say that I am not racists and by saying so people say that is evidence that your racist?! Unbelievably how the Left can hold to this rationalization! LOL.
Matt Walsh is the Terrence Howard of social commentary.
Well put!
I rarely comment on youtube and i have been a member for over 16 years, I am commenting simply becasue Ryan handled this interview/discussion with such class, and wisdom with the way calm manner i which he spoke while presenting facts, breaking down and explainng integral parts of the conversation in addition to showing dignity - that truly impressed me.
That was a master class of how we as a society on how to deal with people like Matt Walsh.
Ryan Grim just proved that a person can be ignorant and malicious even when presenting how their ignorance helps create the problem and having a bias to "accept it" like Matt does.
Ryan Grim is LIVING PROOF that a white person can be an open minded good hearted human being and give us a step in the right direction with out being condescending to the other person of their same race. This is what Dr King and Jane Elliot talking about all the time.
This video was amazing. And as a black man I am proud that the majority of people in America are like Ryan Grim. At least the discussion is on the right side or morality.
@donpimp01☺️👏
He presented facts really? Couldn't name one study of mortgage discrimination. We are all to assume that what he says is in fact evidence given his echo chamber. Then he says implicit bias which requires no verification or validation. Get Real kid!
@@craigmatthews4517 Look up Bernard Garrett case in 1954. Also currently there is a class action lawsuit with Wells Fargo going on right now it was filed back in 2018 for unfair interest rates.
That should help you out with ones you are unfamiliar with
@@craigmatthews4517what about the facts about the west still punishing Haiti 200 years later for being one of the first colonies to gain their independence?
I honestly found it a good discussion, with genuine back-and-forth happening between Ryan and Matt on their disagreements on how policies are construed as racist. You can disagree with either side, but they had this talk about meaningful issues without getting upset, name-calling, or refusing to talk to one another. And that's what we need to see more of in media.
However… you can’t disagree with facts…
They did have a civil back and forth, sure. I think that is dwarfed by the fact that at the end of the day Matt Walsh is a deeply unserious person who lies, grifts gaslights and straw-mans on a daily basis.
@@udecide0010wrong. He exposes the grifters-the race huxsters.
His next film "Am i Anti-semitic??" Where he travels around USA making valid criticism of the Israeli government and Ben Shapiro calls him a jew hater
Like he wants to go back to making his shitty content in a van.
I'd toss in a few thousand $ to help finance THAT movie!
Matt Walsh should definitely make that film if he’s not racist
Can we stop about Palestine ??? It's gonna continue and likely will escalate. Stop asking for a ceasefire
@@CleverChina of course you don’t want to talk about Palestine 🇵🇸 the truth hurts
Ryan basically asked what's in it for the participants. These are the "omnipotent moral busybodies". CS Lewis answered that question before these particular people even existed.
"Of all the tyrannies, a tyranny exercised for the good of its victims may
may be the most oppressive. It may be better to live under robber barons
than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may
sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but
those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end,
for they do so with the approval of their consciences." -- C.S. Lewis
I have used that same quote multiple times too. Thanks. Fits perfectly here
Here is the full quote:
“Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, and his cupidity may at some point be satiated, but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience. They may be more likely to go to Heaven yet at the same time likelier to make a Hell of Earth. This very kindness stings with intolerable insult. To be "cured" against one's will and cured of states which we may not regard as disease is to be put on a level of those who have not yet reached the age of reason or those who never will; to be classed with infants, imbeciles, and domestic animals.”
― C.S. Lewis
Better be careful, the left will accuse you of being a fascist if you go around quoting CS Lewis.
@@M_Pross Here is the full quote:
“Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, and his cupidity may at some point be satiated, but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience. They may be more likely to go to Heaven yet at the same time likelier to make a Hell of Earth. This very kindness stings with intolerable insult. To be "cured" against one's will and cured of states which we may not regard as disease is to be put on a level of those who have not yet reached the age of reason or those who never will; to be classed with infants, imbeciles, and domestic animals.”
― C.S. Lewis
@@M_Pross I'm a straight, white man. They're already going to make that accusation. I just don't care. I just roll with it. If someone says that about me, I'll say something in my limited German vocabulary or make a comment on their ignorance.
@@craigmatthews4517 Thanks for posting that. There's no better description of the left than that.
Matt Walsh doesn't compute what Ryan is even saying.
Because a lot of Ryan's premises are assumed
@@chrisdyer5879They would only be assumed to someone like Matt Walsh because he doesn't read
Ryan is a clown
Ryan is talking in Marxist, so its not easy for Matt to understand.
That's cause Matt doesn't care.... Bro. He doesn't... He's just at the daily wire to grift and make money.
Holy shit can’t believe this guy is on here. Need more of this
Are you trying to kill more of my brain cells. Tell me one thing he said that made sense?
@@grospipo20 That the DEI grifters are real and a thing. Broken clocks and all.
@@drockopotamus1 a grifter pointing out other grifters?
@@grospipo20all of it. Hes not using crayons so perhaps its confusing you.
I don't agree with Matt Walsh at all, but I respect that they are willing to have a dialogue with him.
You know what I see very little of? Lefties going conservative shows especially politicians!
How can you not? He backs all his ideas with facts and statistics
@@blackerpanther3329 LMFAO yea right, ALL his ideas ALL the time. It's not that he just talks to the camera based on his own feelings for an hour and doesn't do any research
I’ve worked in the mortgage industry on and off for 20 years. The comments on mortgage rates for black families being any different is just BOGUS. It may be true that black families on average have lower credit scores… or maybe black famines will accept fewer approvals vs shopping for the very best rates… But all else being equal the rate sheets don’t care.
And the regulations make it impossible
Black people are rejected more often for mortgage loans and are pushed into subprime mortgages. If they do manage to buy homes those home are appraised at lower values simply because someone black owns the home.
but, but, but.....there have been SO many studies....
Thank you! I had this discussion with my mom recently. I said, “so you’re telling me that a loan officer, who is commission driven and doesn’t care who lives where so long as they get the commission for a purchase, is SO racist that they’ll forego the commission on a $1,000,000+ purchase because they don’t like black people? That they’ll RISK not being able to take care of their family because they so staunchly don’t want them to live there?” And she looked at me and said “yes”. That people are so racist that they’d rather not feed their families. And that’s when I knew she had gone off the deep end. People are too selfish to be racist over their own self interests (besides the WNBA but that’s a topic for another day).
You are absolutely correct
So according to matt walsh, the only way we can tell if something or someone is racist is if they themselves identify as racist, But he complains abt "anti-white racism" all the time on his show
What does racism mean to you?
Did you watch the film?
But the people he accuses of "anti-white racism" are quite literally saying that ALL WHITE PEOPLE ARE EVIL!!! So they very much DO identify themselves as racist!
So, if I say I am not a racist then that is proof that I am a racist?? Your rationalization would be comical if it wasn't so ridiculous. Get real kid.
He talks about systemic (rules based) racism.
This guy lost me on the first 3 minutes....
Work on that attention span.
@@Firerose101him spewing racism is so cringe
@@BASSFISHINGMIC he's isn't. The fact you think that is what is wrong with America
@@Firerose101 Nah! I'm fairly certain that what is wrong with America is people like you. 🤷
Bro, don't you get it? If you're a man who enjoys sleeping with men, you're not g@yy unless you say you're g@yy.
Transwoman: a woman is anyone who believes they're a woman.
Matt Walsh: Words already have definitions. What gives you the right to re-define a word?
Also Matt Walsh: I have a new definition of racism and it has everything to do with intent.
This point!! 🙌
A toaster oven is anyone who says they’re a toaster oven
Transracist.
What? You realize the definition change to racism happened before and Matt Walsh’s definition is the old definition, right?
@@11Garrett11 Which not a single person in history ever sincerely did. Also one would assume that people are capable of seeing the difference between a woman and a toaster oven, but apparently you don't
The problem is that “racist” has been so overused and diluted as to mean nothing anymore.
NO, its that a lot of people don't understand that word and don't care to. They dismiss anything thats rightfully pointed out as racist.
@@jasonmoran5152when everything's racist, nothing is racist.
@bigredneck789 terrible strawman.. everything isn't racist and people that understand the subject never claimed that.
Your side thinks that because you don't understand the subject and you probably do a lot of racist things
@@jasonmoran5152 nice try, kid. That argument may sound really good in an echo chamber. But out in the real world, it's mainly met with eyerolls.
@@bigredneck789 sir or ma'am, you aren't in the real world. In fact, you're in the fake news echo chamber you project onto others.
If a person is 100% grifter can they be defined as racist?
They prefer the term DEI consultant. But yeah they are both racist AND grifters if we're being intellectually honest about it.
If they grift from racism .
Yeah, if they use racist criteria to disparage and disadvantage other races, they are acting and therefore being racist even if it's not part of their beliefs.
The much more appropriate title for this video.
@@Ellieempress Hope you qualify Robin DiAngelo as part of this, if that's your stance.
I love the very careful meticulous way, Ryan politely challenges Matt's view on systemic racism or lack thereof.
@@Xorgrim Are you racist?
Notice how Matt had to concede the point at the end but then said it was "classism" not "racism". What an obvious reach so that he doesn't have to admit he's wrong, LOL.
@@RickyMondragon-g5nbut it is classism
@@RickyMondragon-g5n Yes. But are you a racist?
@@lovromusec8636 Exactly. It is classism. Ask a poor white family in Appalachia if they can get a loan with low interest rates. Ryan HAS to see racism in everything or else his worldview crumbles, and that would be devastating to him. Everyone he disagrees with HAS to be racist, and he'll use all kinds of "red herring" argument tactics to confuse his opponent in order to reinforce the projection he's putting out and making people responsible for. He is living out Robin DiAngelo's principle of, "it's not the question 'did racism occur', but rather, 'how did racism manifest itself in this situation'?"
He was hell bent on proving his point but lacked facts or specific policies to support it.
This is the real source of division in the US; instead of focusing on facts and finding solutions, people keep debating racism, racism, racism, which is such a waste of time.
His entire point is to leave the racism bullshit alone.
This statement means nothing. Who r u even referring to lol?
You're referring to the host, right?
Yeah Matt, you dingus. Haitian people have little to no influence on the trajectory of their government. That’s like asking if Medieval peasants had any influence on the orders of the King.
Well, YOU don't influence YOUR government that much either...
@@janisauzins4103 That's their point.
@@damon6086 But then NO people in the world are responsible for the conditions they live in, because direct democracy is not really instituted anywhere. So USA is doing better than Sudan because the 0.01% of Americans who have had real influence on the "trajectory of US government", have been so much better at it than the corresponding ruling class in Sudan? Nothing to do with the genius of individual Americans, the spirit and attitude of American workers? The common people have nothing to do with the success of their country?
@@janisauzins4103 You're talking about a different kind of influence. The OP is talking about influence as in swaying the government towards the people. Those 0.1% aren't us. They're the ruling class who pays our government to screw poor people.
@janisauzins4103 i don't think you realize, you proved the opposite point in your response.
It really is great that you interview all kinds of people with very different views, it up holds the company's values.
he cried about Kamalas white guy tacos comment so …
Are there black guy tacos?
If Trump said black guy tacos liberal media members would smash him for that
Kamala didn't say it. Tim Walz (a white guy) did
I don't think he was crying racism, I think he was pointing out the double standard. If he said another color besides white, a certain portion of the online community would be crying racism
@@LodidodiOddyHe was literally saying it was racist. He believes the only racism in America is against white people lmao
If Dwight from the office and joy Bayhar had a baby, it would be Ryan Grim.
He's more of a Tobey
"Why are you the way you are?"
Ryan is the kinda guy that pays to watch his “wife” perform for another. Ryan is the grossest kind of man.
@@Parsinen257 I hate so much about the things you choose to be
@@drewthedogman9 lmao oh that’s quite an image
The house analogy is more like somebody firebombed your house and then critiqued you relentlessly for your lack of housekeeping abilities
Thank you 👏🏽👏🏽
That analogy is time-sensitive. If you have decades to rebuild, are left alone to do it, and never do.....what does that say about you?
What if the house wasn't built by the occupants in the first place? What if they only inherited it? What if they are incapable of building their own house, for whatever reason?
So many questions, so little time.
That's colonization baby! 👉👉
Nice try trololol. Trying to rage bait saying it's "time sensivitive" when ryan brought up the point in the video that the US has overthrown the Haitian government in just 2021. Decades to rebuild my ass, troll
@@bbainter7880 The problem is (as Ryan shows) it's multiple things done over the decades and not one thing done one time decades ago...
How can you judge "if they are incapable of building their own house" when the latest destruction was 3 years ago?
In what world do you get to create a definition of racism and then everyone has to filter it through your definition.
The liberal one which says "only white people can be racist."
Since when do racists have to self identify, to count as racists
The media has been doing that to us for years.
The left did that when they tried to say things like, “Black people can’t be racist because of power dynamics,” while not realizing how racist they actually sound when they say garbage like that.
The current world lol. Where anti racist had to modify the definition of racism because they kept getting called racists.
Ryan was so uncomfortable when he started talkin about bad Asian drivers. He looked at Emily, who was having a blast, like, are we really talking about this on this channel right now?
He was so disappointed in Emily
The mental gymnastics to avoid even considering racism as a possible factor is clearly not ignorance.
Just need facts to back up "feelings".
@@agreberagdeny , deny , deny.😅
But Walsh isn't saying there's no racism. His movie isn't about denying racism, it's about exposing millionaire "anti-racism" grifters like Robin DeAngelo.
You're racist.
@@M_Prosshe's literally denying very obvious racism in the very video
Conservatives who consider themselves "America First" should absolutely be more aware and focused on the U.S. governemt foreign policy which intentionally destroys other countries around the world. Immigration wouldnt be at such a staggering rate if it werent for constant meddling around the world.
Tell it to the Clintons.
I consider myself America First. That doesn’t mean I’m anti interventionist. I believe in policies that focus on Americans. If destabilizing another nation is in Americas interest then so be it. The Ukraine imo isn’t in Americas interests.
@johnjames5459 Tell it to Trump, too, while you're at it.
@@luisalejandro2335then you can't complain about immigration. That destabilizing other nations is the root cause of it. If you are for destabilizing other countries, than you are for immigration.
@@spamfilter32 What war did he start?
He’s a “genius” until he’s confronted by educated people. All that random rambling he does on his podcast wasn’t flying here and I love it 😂
Ryan turns up the heat immediately
Emily was fan girl-img
'Vacuous' doesn't even begin to describe Ryan
Late to the comments, but NOBODY talked about Matt Walsh's movie that exposes the anti white left wing racism of Hollywood/Democrats ideology. But lots of people want to cry about Haiti.
Anti white bs. Gtfo
I agree these Haiti comments are hurting my soul, but at the same time there wasn’t much to talk about from the movie because it seemed both parties totally agreed that the race hustling stuff from the movie was ridiculous
That's because both sides agreed on that part. You're clearly not paying attention to the WHOLE video.
@@RadfordCastro1 yeah I was about to say, I thought they all agreed on that part pretty early on lol
Well Matt Walsh just spent 35 minutes explaining to us why we shouldn't take him or his movie seriously
Matt does not look good here. He got bailed out by Emily multiple times. Emily and Ryan having this dialog would be much more beneficial.
Emily isn't much better than Matt
Idk how you can posit that systemic racism doesn't exist anymore without understanding how systemic classism has been used for the purpose of discriminating on a racial basis.
This is just word salad slightly more intelligent than the word salad that comes out of Kamala’s mouth.
If anything systemic classism would hurt white people more because the country was basically all white.
Oh cry me a river
@@slee2695 it just shows Matt's lack of knowledge about the subject :)
I agree there is systemic racism but its Democrats who are running the system.
It must be such a honor for Emily to meet her hero.
Never meet your heroes 🤣
@@roberttaylor9259 Are you racist?
Thank you to Breaking Points for having oppositional guests. It has been a while since I tuned in but I will more often if this kind of constructive conversations happen more often.
One of the advantages of having two hosts with sometimes opposing viewpoints is that it makes it more likely for the Giedt to be oppositional to at least one of them
No kidding the Loomer comment is racist
At the same time, how can you be offended by someone who looks like she survived a post-birth abortion
I am South Asian. I found it hilarious because they are true stereotypes of my people.....once you stop the victim hood mentality the world becomes a funnier place.
“In what way, can this country be improved by being more like Haiti?”
Haiti is 94% Christian and 66% Catholic
Is Matt going to deny that?
Most of them practice Vodou together with Christianity which makes them not much of Christians. But with failing education system it is probably hard to judge them for limited comprehension of Catholic teachings, etc. From Wiki: "An often used joke about Haiti holds that the island's population is 85% Roman Catholic, 15% Protestant, and 100% Vodou."
@@reginalannister2262 oh I am guessing that is why there are so many white catholic american priest and haiti. It is for the voodoo
He means making america darker is not great! Noticed he is not saying this for Eastern European.
And 6% voodoo cat-eating magic!!!
@@reginalannister2262 I do not see any claim on Wiki that it is “all” or “most”. I only seen “many” or “small amount”. “Whereas a very small amount of Catholic Haitians combine their faith with aspects if Vodou, this practice is much more rare among Haitian Protestants, whose churches tend to strongly denounce Vodou as diabolical”. Under the article Christianity in Haiti.
no way they got matt walsh on here, lets hope emily isnt simping for him
Spoiler: she is.
She clearly is
Check when she quotes the Laura Loomer tweet and subtly laughs. It’s kinda putting it in joke sense before Matt answers
She is
The prison system wasn't created to be sexist. But male prisoners far outnumber women prisoners. Therefore, the prison system is sexist.
That's Ryan's reasoning.
To better perfect your analogy the way that he would use it is saying that prison was created to place men in prison but down the line they had started to allow women to also become inmates and just because the women are now going to jail along with the men it doesn't mean that the effect or the intention behind the jail has changed it's only expanded So instead of injustice being done on black people it's now being done on all people in America and that's the claim that's being made is that we're all equal now so the system is no longer racist. The point that Ryan is making is that even though the system now has laws in place against that the effects of what was put in place in the beginning are still having an echo within the psychology and the actions of those people that those laws were put on against. So in a sense the system is still racist in the fact that the effect of its original racist intention is still having a causality within the people of color today. And Matt does not want to acknowledge that.
Correct!
Always question the systems around you, even if you think it's stupid and the conclusion is self-evident. Maybe the reason more men are in prison is simply because men are inherently more likely to commit crimes, but correlation is not the same as causation and maybe there's some other factor at play.
Prisons probably aren't sexist, but that doesn't mean we don't have other societal issues pushing more men towards behavior that gets them locked up. It doesn't mean men are inherently prone to violent crimes. The point isn't to make blanket statements about prisons being racist or sexist, it's about identifying why patterns exist to see if we can actually do something about it.
@@squiddler7731completely delusional comment. Androgenic effects of Testosterone include aggression. Female bodybuilders have confirmed this. Androgens don't only affect the body.
I despise Matt Walsh, and I understand Ryan’s instinct is to be diplomatic - which I usually appreciate - but I really think there could’ve been a lot more pushback from him, especially in regards to the other comments recalling the ‘white people tacos’ joke that Walsh called racist, which clearly wouldn’t meet the high bar he’s established for racism in this interview if he actually applied it consistently.
Edit: ok I spoke a little too soon. The chill tone Ryan delivers with can be so powerful because it forces people like Matt to contend with the substance of what he’s saying instead of latching onto the tone of it or the emotions and then run with it like they won the argument because the other side got upsetty spaghetti. Though I still REALLY wish he’d had that tacos joke off the top of his head because that really would have destroyed Matt’s entire argument.
Except you missed Matt’s entire point with that. You’re blinded by your own bias.
😂
If someone on the left said it about Vivek he would be screaming racism 😂
No he wouldn’t, Ann Coulter said racist shit to Vivek’s face and the entire GOP was mute.
@willis7404 Ann Coulter is on the left?
Well, Babylon Bee had this type of joke about Vivek and Vivek just laughed about it because he's not a hyper sensitive bioatch.
@@reginalannister2262 “if someone on the left”
Are you under the assumption Babylon is left?
Do better…
@@reginalannister2262Vivek laughed it off because if he ever called out their racism his career in Republican politics would be dead.
as long as you don't "feel" ill-will towards the person, it isn't racist. ROTF not laughing. He is saying if the person doesn't identify as racist, they are not racist... Sooo, he can tell us what a woman is but not a racist.
You're saying that I can hate you even though I like you? How can I hate you without "ill will"?
@@janisauzins4103 racism is a prejudice, discrimination against a race. It isn't ill-will. You can be a racist because you learned wrong. I knew a white teenager who literally thought black people had lesser intelligence...not because she had ill-will but because that is what she "learned" from her family environment. Way too often people want to require "ill-will" to define racism to excuse themselves of their "accidental" racism. Guess what? It's still racism with or without intent.
@@Lisa-z8w2bwrong.
First off, the intelligence thing is a fact and it was studied thoroughly for decades. Not necessarily due to genetics but more cultural, parental issues. But its true. The average IQ for that group is 85.
Second, ill will means bad intent. Saying someone is part of a group with lower IQ does not make one a racist. Just like saying that group is several times more likely to commit violence. Its simply being informed.
These are problems white hill billies had way back and we shamed those people out of society. The problem is with the B community we have white liberals since the 60s propping up that bad behavior as "blck culture" so its off limits to shame it. So now you get new generations worshipping rappers and violence and the cycle will continue until its shamed by most of that community.
Read some Thomas Sowell. He explains this thoroughly.
“It’s funny - these guys are clowns. These guys .. these guys are total clowns.”
I see what you did there Ryan.
I genuinely like Emily, but this interview felt like she was pitching Matt softballs and actively trying to undermine Ryan’s questions
Maybe it seems that way because Ryan's a tool
Can you tell me what question she should have asked?
Ryan the GOAT
In this episode pf the Ryan Grim Show, Ryan really doesnt want to talk about the movie.
Am I racist is a great comedy. I reccomend it to everyone.
I'd rather peel the skin off of my legs than watch anything Incel Matt Walsh does.
That movie….i don’t get it..what was the point of that scene. Was it supposed to be funny???
Thank you. I thought it was supposed to be a comedy? It just goes to show, Republicans only laugh when someone is being hurt.
Yeah - I like Matt, but I don't see what's so funny about the waiter dropping the plates. I mean, I guess it really happened in real life, so there's the "cringe" moment, but I don't see how it connects to racism or anything at all
I love reading comments from progressives. You start to realize how easy it is to destroy their arguments like Matt did. By asking simple questions, and letting them respond.
You're projecting again.
Ryan looks so concerned. Or maybe that's his default face.
It was definitely Ryan’s default face, which is I don’t give F.
Concerned about matt "let's go back to dark ages" walsh make a fool of himself? Highly unlikely
That's the look you get when your panties are in a knot.
Wishing Ryan had like Krystal as well since he's not a natural debater.
Ryan reminds me of my dog, both always have this concerned look on their faces - especially when the subject of Haitians are broached 😅
Finally someone asked him if they also knew he was involved with the camera crew. I’ve been wanting that part answered but people just kept asking how they filmed it.
Let's appreciate how civil the overall discussion went. When Ryan brought his points on Haiti, Matt was humbled and he gracefully conceded. And during the systemic racism topic, Ryan was cornered by other two. Let's not get caught up in the argument that who is smarter, left or right. We all know the real enemy is uni-party. Kudos to all of them for having the conversation. Need more!
Yes. Lets have rich white people decide what racism is and how it works. Great idea. 😅
Ryan was not cornered what are you talking about. He got Matt Walsh to admit there might be systemic issues experienced by black people. But Matt Walsh tried to make the claim that systemic issues disproportionately affecting black people does not constitute racism because of a lack of intent, which is ridiculous. Please come down from cloud cuckoo land.
Lost me as soon as he said the tweet wasn't racist. I don't know how "people will only be able to convey their feedback through a customer satisfaction survey at the end of the call that nobody will understand" is not a reference to the stereotype that Indians have inferior English skills, and fully falls into Matt's own definition that things are racist when they question a person's intellectual capability solely on their race.
Completely destroyed his own non-existent credibility in one answer.
If the tweet had been written by an Indian person, would you still say it is a racist tweet?
@@chingron It wasn't written by an Indian person, so what you're asking is completely irrelevant.
@@three_mountaineers775 So you won’t answer my “irrelevant” question?
@@chingronThe answer is clear the tweet would have been written by a self hating Indian lol every group has an Uncle Tom
“A lot of the United States adventurism and intervention in other countries has been unwise”
This whitewashing of US failures, mistakes and atrocities is just ridiculous. The illusion of American exceptionalism puts blame on anyone or anything but the US.
Its just an objectively true statement... do you have a problem with it?
Seeing Ryan Grim and Matt Walsh have a civil conversation is amazing and not something I ever expected.
Go to 16 minutes in for Walsh's first dear in the headlights moment...
I need to do that because video quit after the Walsh and Emily defined racism in their own white supremacist perspectives. Ryan was sitting quietly. Reading all these comments reveals I need to watch it.
I quit watching. Don't know how that turned into video 😑
The waiter scene 》Take Borat, now subtract the cleverness, the irony, the setup, and the comedy.
I see someone watches the Cody Showdy
@@takon074 ... never heard
Yes!!!!. Borat should sue for plagiarism😂😅. He ripped him off. It was painfully unfunny.
@user-cg6fd4in1d The talent gap is so wide though that he might not have a case
@@captainspaullding True but it was so obvious.
There are laws that protect against discrimination based on race, so, if the cases this guy cites (the “widely accepted studies”) then there are lawsuits which would have followed.
You are spot on.
can understand why Ryan never named one study on Mortgage discrimination. Ryan simply states that there are numerous studies that show racial discrimination in mortgage lending, but fails to provide a citation for one. He also admits that people will probably find fault in them which is true. I can see why he never gave one specific citation study as most research studies are false to begin with. HE WAS RELYING on people watching this not to check out the veracity and efficacy of the studies.
I have looked at the various studies out there and Blacks do pay more, but each study does not ask the question as to whether they are justified in charging more. They simply state there is a discrepancy and that is evidence/proof enough of racial bias. In other words some of the researchers confabulate correlation = causation. See High-Income Black Homeowners Receive Higher Interest Rates than Low-Income White Homeowners Tuesday, February 16, 2021 | Raheem Hanifa. "While additional studies are needed to identify the specific causes of Black-white interest rate disparities, widespread racial discrimination in mortgage markets has played a role." They leave it at that but provide no evidence to link "racial discrimination in mortgage markets"?!?
Additionally, the title is very misleading. It's unbelievable how disingenuous the author is. For example the difference within the same income range ($75K - $100k) is only .00085% or 8.5 % of 1%. Thats not even close to being statistically significant. The only significant difference is in the ($30K - $44999) range of income. I wish he had made his data available or point to his source so that one could determine the randomness and whether the study was under powered (e.g. not enough data to draw a conclusion).
Might also suggest you read "Why Most Published Research Findings Are False" by John Ioannidis, a professor at the Stanford School of Medicine. It will open your eyes!
Thomas Sowell succinctly puts, “Some things are believed because they are demonstrably true. But many other things are believed simply because they have been asserted repeatedly-and repetition has been accepted as a substitute for evidence.”
You should also consider how Obama was involved in a suit against Citibank for discrimination in give Mortgages in Chicago. Of the 186 mortgages that were given only 19 of those still own the house with a clean credit rating. Thats ~ 90% failure rate. Many of the people who got the mortgages did not thank Obama as they had to go into bankruptcy too. See Buycks-Roberson v. Citibank Fed. Sav. Bank Investors Business Daily and MetroWest Daily News.
And how would you exactly go about suing them and proving in court the fault in an individual case?
@@peachyjam9440 Really someone has to explain this to you? It's called gathering evidence (e.g. emails, correspondence, personnel files, depositions, witness testimony.....)
@@craigmatthews4517 I'm not asking in general, I'm asking specifically for this instance, how would you be able to prove in court the fault within an individual case if the studies take into account small data pools gathered from thousands of places in order to find a conclusion? Who is supposed to sue them if the researchers aren't real tenants? Who will have the money to fight in court?
Time to play "is this interview totally nauseating"?
Well, two people are..
@@tiffanylang8253I agree , Matt and Matt are awful .
Love Matt Walsh, we need more man like him. Bring masculinity back!
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 you think this dbag is masculine? 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
You love that racist beard, do you?
He's a upward failure.
And bring back beards!
Emily saying she likes Walsh's movies, coupled with her appearance on Megan Kelly. I'm starting to think she's a real ghoul
she hides it well. Shes a Federalist Society lackey.
Does a ghoul mean somebody that doesn’t 100% agree with you?
@@Pineandfeather No. I'm not the standard.
A ghoul is someone that supports ghoulish things. Some of those things include, but are not limited to: using 1800's era racism to justify 2020's racism, as if the lessons learned after the 1800's shouldn't be used to avoid pitfalls in the 2020's but rather expect and accept falling into them, over and over again. Another example would be listening to a crazed podcaster lie about the positions of a VP candidate, nodding along with the insanity, and when given a chance ADD to that instead of attempting to re-hinge the un-hinged.
@@Pineandfeather No. I'm not the standard. Do you have another, better question or is this a rhetorical exercise for you because you're upset I called out Saagar and Emily?
@@Pineandfeather "i get that"
Matt Walsh’s understanding of race issues and Haiti has all the expertise and nuance of a six year old.
Matt Walsh is a perfect example of how speaking confidently will always convince some amount of people that what you are saying is reasonable/well thought out, even if what you are saying is totally and wholly ignorant to the facts of the matter.
I didn't see any ignorance. The lefty interviewer made a bunch of claims about Haiti. He doesn'took like a historical scholar to me. Did he provide PROOF that America is RESPONSIBLE for Haiti's 3rd world status for the past several decades? He never even explained why we muddled with their leaders (like maybe they were evil/corrupt). Also, that STILL wouldn't explain why we now have to accept thousands of Haitian migrants.
Worked for Obama
As an Asian American, I know through personal experience how a gated community had undisclosed preferences with regards to who could purchase a condo there: black people were the least favored, Latino and Asians were next, white people of European descent was the most favored. Racism does exist, it’s just more subtle and hidden. Progress has been made, but it will take time, through cultures blending and intermarrying or friendships that are diverse.
Except most white people don’t live in gated communities and can’t.
16:00 Typical conservative squirm when required to actually engage with historical context. Try to move on, try to straw man absolutes, etc. So easy to dismantle. Get used to this for the new era of conservatives passing the neocon torch to the DNC
So dismantle it. Since the BP hosts couldn't. Nothing he said is incorrect.
After Ryan gave Walsh the history on Haiti, he should have asked him if he thought it was reasonable that some of those Haitians wanted to escape. And if he thinks that, being that the US and French governments have harmed Haiti, do these governments have a responsibility to rectify the situation? I like that Grim brought up the history, but he let Walsh pretend like he knew that history, and that he had already considered it, which seems unlikely
Poor people can't always move because they are poor.
The vote blue no matter who folks are some of the more racist people I know.
I guess you don't know many people then....
@@jenniefeyen544 Explain to me then how the policies of the left have helped black and brown people over the last thirty years.
@@gov4130what has your shit party done to help them?
@@guadwin I’m not affiliated with a party. Neither of them show any interest in doing the will of the voters since corporations became people too. They’ve rigged it such they don’t need our votes to continue their agenda.
@@guadwin I’m not a part of a party. I’m an American citizen that stands with other American citizens. These people we elect are supposed to be our employees, and nothing more.
LOL hes sitting on Krystal's seat!
Wonder if Mr. Walsh decided to smell it to get close to a real woman
That's the closest he will be to an adult woman.
Hope he farted
@@1massboy What is a woman?
@@kai.m imane khaliff
A white man telling us what racism is and is not. Thank you so much.
A person only listening to another person if they have the right skin color. Thanks for that douche
It's in the dictionary ya know. So a white man shouldn't have to explain it to you.
Using his race as a argument is a good indicator that _you’re_ racist. Thanks, racist! You just told on yourself.
Yes. That’s correct.
Matt is awesome
What?
this week on the Ryan Grimm show, Ryan Grimm interviews Ryan Grimm dazzling Ryan Grimm with his opinions on Ryan Grimm.
The movie was pretty damn funny.
“I don’t think it’s race driven” -Matt Walsh on a topic he admitted less than 20 seconds prior he didn’t even know it was taking place
He's being interviewed and asked about his thoughts. So he offered his thoughts.
@@davidmortensen5709 It’s a totally uneducated “thought”. He didn’t even know about something existing, then a few seconds later casually muses like he understands the intent and origin.
@@daniel4815its a pretty safe assumption when talking with a leftist, if they think something is based on racism, it is not. I mean he's got a 10-1 shot.
Matt Walsh= facts, other side of the table= word salad
It’s ok if you don’t have the best grasp on the English language. You can take classes for that with the Haitian immigrants in Springfield that are helping a town ravaged by opioids.
@@tylerdink5128 Ah yes because importing a bunch of crime addicted losers without jobs is gonna help a community.....
I guess you are hearing voices in your head.
literally other way around. Last 10 minutes, this dude was slapped with so much undeniable facts of racism and systemic racism, so intelligently and elegantly... and all he could muster up was "I probably disagree with you" which is a ludicrous statement in itself and "oh it's class not race" which was an outright lie... you need to rewatch and take notes mate :D
@@tylerdink5128 lol
Saying the White House will smell like curry and the call centre remark isn’t racist because we would have to ask her and take her word if she ‘hated’ people from India? That’s crazy to defend that
Krystal stans working overtime in the comments 🤭
Emily really thought she had Ryan in this argument
And she was right.
This title "confronted" is click bait. I thought he was very reasonable with his responses and Emily and Ryan conversed without agendas. Healthy discourse.
I guess you don’t know the definition of confront then
Confrontation ≠ altercation
The fact people think you can talk about class without race is crazy to me 😂😂😂
Why?
I’m glad to see Breaking Points decided to upload this self-own on their part. There was no feasible answer on the part of BP regarding “systemic racism”
What do you even mean by self own? Emily is conservative 🤣
@@cringeyacademic5035Hardly.
@@joegalley2187 how is this a self own? They always have different debates and various opposing perspectives on this show, it’s not like they’re inherently a left show and so somehow sabotaged their viewpoint with this convo
Bro matt walsh got aggressively owned. Did you miss how he literally admitted at the end that if the studies are correct (and he himself seems to give good reasons as to why they could be correct) that black people get discriminated against disproportionately to white people on mortgage applications, because the banks see black names and make assumptions they wouldnt make were they to see white names? He literally admits that but then tries to make it entirely about class. A systemic issue that affects non-white people is systemic racism, regardless of the intent. You can't possibly have seen Matt Walsh fumble this hard and think he won.
@@renblais1274 you mean black names like Johnson & Smith
Matt's right about Haiti. Folks forget that Haiti is only one half of an island, and the Dominican Republic that makes up the other half is doing relatively well. Thus, you have to ask yourself why these outside influences, like the American government as alleged, are somehow only making a mess of the one half.
Secondly, for all the talk about outside influence in Haiti that ignores how the host is basically implying that it's "only fair" that the haitian be brought to the US since the US is somehow the bad guy, forgetting that what he's saying was bad in Haiti is exactly what he's supporting being done to the people of Springfield OH. Those people had no say, no notice, no care given at all. They woke up one morning and their entire region had been completely changed by "outsiders". Their relatively nice community was overrun with foreigners who don't speak the language, share the customs, or even have the education needed to seamlessly integrate into the culture. Who cares about them?
By his own logic, he should be outraged over what was done with the people of Springfield, especially since it's his own country and could very well be his own neighborhood next up on the chopping block.
The thing I wish Ryan said is “if the inequalities are not systemic, do you think that Black people are just incapable of success, therefore inferior?”
That’s an obvious false dichotomy. Thinking people should know better than that. Many black people, both Americans and immigrants are quite successful. Because the rates at the “racial” group level aren’t equal doesn’t in any way indicate discrimination or inferiority anymore than Asians being at the top of the economic ladder indicates inherent inferiority of whites or discrimination against them. It’s obviously bad reasoning. There are many other very logical reasons for why that is or could be.
This wouldn’t work out the way you think it does…..
@@westonmeyer3110 It doesn’t allow him much space to back out of admitting his views are racist by his own definition.
@@TheHeBGeeBees
And so are yours according to that logic
@@westonmeyer3110 sorry, what are you attempting to imply?
Could have
Been an interesting interview about the MOVIE, but instead Ryan decided to run the interview off the tracks talking about specific policy issue BS that Matt had no specifics expertise in. I’m other words, he derailed an interview about an interesting movie to try to win an argument that no one was having except him. A truly sh*t job of taking an interesting guest who made a successful movie and talking about everything but the damn movie , which is what anyone who clicked on this video was expecting. Stick to writing, or learn how to stay on point and give watchers what they expect to hear from a Matt Walsh interview. The video should have been title “Ryan grills Matt Walsh over various issues that have absolutely nothing to do with the movie he made.”
Matt Walsh is the one who's in the bubble!
Robin DiAngelo is definitely in a bubble, regardless of how you feel about Walsh.
@@barnoldwhv keep telling yourself that!
@@bad.hat.harry. are you bot Robert DeiAngelo is a total race hustling loon
@@bad.hat.harry. You think DiAngelo isn't? Seriously?
The republicans don't understand that "systemic racism" is an analytic label rather than a moral condemnation of the individuals maintaining the systems. The system itself is racist and should be reformed, regardless of whether or not you can find a primary sinner.
Lol
Leftists literally control the system at every level and NONE of it helps white people in any way.
We can go piece by piece or wholesale, I can destroy your entire worldview very easily either way.
This is just a cop out because you don’t actually know what a “system” is.
What analysis though? How is it even measured, is it anecdotal or statistics driven? Statistics prove that people of Indian or Chinese heritage are by far the highest earners/wealthy demographic across the United States.
Race is not like being a man. Race is a stupid idea, it has more to do with culture and that is valid as far as it goes. What is REAL is family groups or family genetic groups.
How can a joke based around negative racial stereotypes not be a racist joke? You might not be deeply racist but it’s still a racist statement.
It is intent... Thats the thing those who throw that word around keep forgetting. You could hate a person and say mean things to and about that person... But that doesn't mean you hate the person's race.
Intent is a thing of the mind, and can be persieved by others based on a pattern of behavior. The problem now is that the woke has skipped over that "pattern of behavior" part and pick an isolated statement or event, ascribe their own intent to it with no idea what the actual motivation of the person involved is... And determine based on their preconceived ignorance that that 1 thing makes you racist
@@bruchepeasracism isn’t about hate, it’s about a feeling of superiority. I can feel superior to you and not hate you, but just think you are inherently lesser than me because of your race. I might be able to have pleasant conversations with people who I think are inherently lesser than me, and not harbor any personal animosity, but it’d still be racism Uc I thought you were inferior to me due to your skin color, right?
@@corvacopia Saying racism is about a feeling of superiority is quite an oversimplification. Racism is treating someone differently.... Or more accurately treating people negatively or discriminatory based upon their race, irrespective of the motivation, wether it be disdain, superiority /inferiority complex, personal bias or anything else.
The common denominator here is that racism is an action based upon treating people as a collective instead of as individuals... But, how do you know that's what drives a person's actions when you are not in their head? This is the arrogance that people who throw that word around possess which pisses me off.
The only way to judge a person as racist is either to have them admit it, or observe their pattern of behavior over a period of time, it cannot be determined based on a single action or idea a person expresses
@@bruchepeas we are what we repeatedly do. If someone repeatedly makes racist remarks about others, and choses to hurt them and cause harm to them with their speech, then that person is probably a racist because they have a pattern of racist behaviour.
Walsh was not prepared for this. Doesn't seem to have thought through his worldview. Doubt that will stop him from making money selling it though. Is it that different from the DEI consultants he admonishes?
Grifters gonna grift. Clowns gonna clown.
Sorry he doesn’t agree with you.
You make an assertion ("Doesn't seem to have thought through his worldview") but provide no example of what you are talking about. Kind of a worthless comment.
“The wise man speaks because he has something to say; the fool because he has to say something.” - Plato