Bloomberg Innovation index

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 18 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 6

  • @INSPIRATIONFORINNOVATION
    @INSPIRATIONFORINNOVATION  3 роки тому

    Watch next: The Top 10 Most Innovative Countries of the World 2020 ua-cam.com/video/_AqqvRnyn9g/v-deo.html

  • @관우-x1j
    @관우-x1j 3 роки тому +1

    thank you of information
    from s.korea🇰🇷

  • @raakme
    @raakme 3 роки тому +1

    Great to have this perspective on how countries score on innovation. Thanks Gijs!

  • @ted_van_loon
    @ted_van_loon 3 роки тому +1

    great information.
    I believe that innovation should have a higher priority and should not be just for country reasons. for example simple innovation like a new type of toothbrush with only a small not as noticeable difference are easy to publish and get around the world since no one will stand waiting to steal it. for anything more change bringing you basically can't publish it(at least here in the Netherlands) unless you are very rich or famous. for some part that you can't get the experiment parts and terrain, but especially since you need to put quite a lot of protections on it because if you don't register them properly some company sees it, copies it, puts the protections on it and claims it is theirs. those protections also cost a lot and most truly revolutionary innovation doesn't directly have a commercial purpose, so if you just want to publish something for the world to know and be able to use with you name on it to prevent others from restricting others by putting their name and rules on it. and so you can show the actual working of something(because in my experience most people who think to understand something and might often even have studied for it do not truly understand truly new things the right way. because the most important factors about it and it's working are parts you didn't get on school because it is new. and often such things have rather large amounts of factors and effects that cause it that to most would not even seem close to relevant causing further improvement to be reduced and people only being able to make something quite much exactly like your original design(yes this entire thing is out of experience, and actually more than one). Right now I have some things I want to publish and protect it to propper credits and so anyone can use and develop based on it (mostly open source/hardware, since that brings the best gains), where preferred people may not just make a slightly modified version proprietary. right now I don't really have commercial purposes for them(except for one with some alterations which would make great school material), because turning it into a commercial product would require so much further research an a completely different production method rather than handmade versions.
    some of these things are however designed just to be cool or for the fun of it, but might lead to actual innovation. as a example project some ufo I designed when those area 51 things where happening. my joke idea was to make a working ufo that would fe realistic enough, so no propellers, or drone like things. and ofcource I started designing it because I had a idea. I managed to make a working design that to the average person just looks like a magical flying disk and designed it simple enough to make it rather cheap(even though it would be cooler to use em waves). while this system is mostly useless except for it being a really secure aircraft, it had 2 parts in it that might actually cause some more change, those 2 are mainly the same. another serious one is a energy-efficient lightning gun which can actually channel it's lightning into a beam without requiring to much power just for keeping it in a beam, this one I came up with because a friend was modding nerf guns to for example shoot harder, reload automatically, have cool effects or rocket propulsion, etc.(still foam darts) the we went to making it cooler and came to ideas like making the bullets inside the gun, making bullets that generated electricity around them, electric propelled projectiles, all that kind of stuff eventually I thought it would be expensive to mod the projectiles to do such things since they might be single use after which I came with the idea of just shooting electricity, I had experience with a previous experiment on high voltage(when my powersuply died) where one of my devices created something that for a very short time would keep the energy stored in a point in air like a small star, so I knew it was possible, even though I didn't manage to recreate this effect, I found another method to channel my electricity through the air like a beam, this was better for this case since a lightning gun needs to look cool, shooting a small bright thing is only cool if it does something really cool or if you know how it works, this gun however doesn't really have any practical use except for looking cool, useless you for some reason want to use it like a deathray as a weapon under higher power, I do however believe that would be a disregard to n.t.'s deathray, since based on his skills that would most likely be more like that "small star", also because around that time some acidents often linked to him show much lager but similar results to what happened here. and again my lightning gun is made to look cool, is is specifically made less efficient to make the lightning more visible. oh and perhaps it could be made into something like a laser, that would be useful.
    but I have also been working on more serious things, for example one was that I wanted more plants and trees in cities. since citys only like things related to electric power I designed a garden to generate electricity(it is verry different from those 2 other methods). I have had some ideas about a device to make plants grow faster or differently, even though I do not have the test equipment to test it except from studying the biology and behaviour of plants in nature along with knowledge of many other things. some more dangerous things, which however would be great as long as humans don't learn how it works or how to use it themselves without first knowing they will absolutely not use it to do human things, so only using it to learn and teach. and a project from a few years ago where I designed my own type of computer(literally from the ground up) because I didn't completely understand transistor based computers or more specifically transistors.(yes I know the theory, but I wouldn't just be able to make my own modern day transistor. this computer was meant as a extension for a arduino, didn't become that in the end, I just made it a standalone computer. however unlike manny other computer designs this one has extremely high potential accuracy, modularity(so it can quite easily simulate different types of (electrical) computers. while it acts different than transistor and quantum computers, it behaves closer to the quantum computer and with some changes it can do most of the iconic quantum computer stuff, it can however not generate quantum randoms.
    while there are manny more things, this post was meant to address that manny countries actually might just hold back innovation, right now I see things being praised as brand new and to futuristic to believe, while it are technologies you would come up with nearly 10 years ago during highschool when you was distracted, including exactly how you could make them, but ofcource without access to the materials to make it(also literally).