10 Surprising Reasons to Love Rocket Lab

Uncovering ten reasons why Rocket Lab might just be the most IMPRESSIVE space company you've never heard of!
Subscribe For More Tech: bit.ly/3L51Exe
For more content on Robots AI and Tech check out our playlists:
Robots:
• Robots
Hospitality Robots:
• Hospitality Robots
Flying Tech:
• Flying Tech
Health & Fitness:
• Health & Fitness
Elon Musk:
• Elon Musk
Agricultural:
• Agricultural
AI:
• AI
Dangers of AI:
• Dangers of AI
Space:
• Space
Top Ten Tech:
• Top Ten Tech
For copyright matters please contact us at: [e-mail].

[@ArtTaggerr-223]

When will Rocket Lab stock jettison?🚀

[@rayngmelb]

The UBER of the Rocket World, while SpaceX is the Greyhound Bus.

[@dphuntsman]

With respect, that’s not a smart statement. - Dave Huntsman

[@rayngmelb]

@@dphuntsmanTell that to Peter Beck, he was the one who made it.

[@hkultala]

Is this some AI-generated crap? Most of the graphics are about other rockets than Rocket labs rocket. Also there are lots of totally bullshit claims that a crappy AI would generate.

[@AgeofInnovation]

Sorry this one missed the mark

[@dphuntsman]

Look, I can tell you’re trying
Very out of date- by many, many months, even tho only posted two weeks ago. That’s not good, ok? Let me try to be constructive, tho.
Being many, many months out of date leads you to mention missions in the future that happened months ago; you emphasized reusability of 1st stage- by catching by helicopter, which as a technique was dropped well over a year ago after two attempts (all on video). They then went twice to just fishing out of the ocean. RocketLab Says it still, eventually, would like to find a way to, somehow, reuse the first stage of Electron- but it is NOT a priority (they are putting all their R&D money into the new Neutron rocket, not Electron, and that includes working on reusability). I think it’s a mistake, but, basically, Peter Beck has said he’s only going to find time to work on Electron first stage reusability in future on a ‘non-interference’ basis with Electron’s revenue-generating missions. Understandable.
Other Errors: DOD contract is $500m- not $5B; and,
Neutron- a Medium Launch Vehicle designed to compete with SpaceX’s Falcon 9 vehicle - is NOT designed to compete with Starship.
As to the positives for Rocketlab:
Vertically integrated co: Launch + satellites end-to-end services.
Neutron- I hadn’t seen those Neutron animations; good. And it is designed to compete with SpaceX’s Falcon 9 vehicle But, drop reference to crew missions- those aren’t the focus. And: Neutron is Partially-reusable: like Falcon 9, first stage only. Keep in mind, that last week, there were three rocket failures in the world: Chinese, European/Ariane 6, Falcon 9 - ALL of the (non-reusable) upper stage. That will still remain the most vulnerable.
Smart Acquisitions, Well Integrated -
3D printing - very important- but, fyi, Rocketlab not only one doing it (tho farther ahead than others, like Relativity Space).
Impressive Launch Record- recently did their 50th launch. Currently the only reliable small satellite launcher.
Focus on small Launch has led to them being Dominant in small space launch.
Diversified portfolio: while biggest R&D effort is the Neutron partially-reusable launcher, ⅔rds of the business is Non-launch; i.e., satellite production/services.
Multiple launch pads/two continents
Dave Huntsman

[@AgeofInnovation]

Thank you for pointing out the discrepancies, I appreciate your constructive feedback. We will tighten things up and continually improve.