Rivers and Pan Asian on Clash of Nations

[@uberschpast4575]

Now the Russian tsars can launch "zero" fighter plains in the air and yamato class battleships in the volga... 100% historically accurate

[@BMfoxgaming]

@@uberschpast4575 Yeah, they shouldn't have changed the doctrines.

[@BMfoxgaming]

@@uberschpast4575 This will be a pain for the weaker Comintern interceptors.

[@uberschpast4575]

@@BMfoxgaming indeed
Also with the implementation of rivers the powerfull panasian battleships can bomb many cities

[@vladimir-uz3dq]

If I had a dollar for every time BMFox played the ‘womp womp’ sound effect in this video alone I’d be able to afford a lunch 😂

[@Ricsi_Pop]

thought you are sleeping already lol

[@BMfoxgaming]

@@Ricsi_Pop you've got him there 😃

[@BMfoxgaming]

@@vladimir-uz3dq LOL, if that were true I'have used even more often 😂

[@imaadhussain8082]

Asian doctine in Europe 😂😂😂😂

[@BMfoxgaming]

@@imaadhussain8082 it's an abomination 😡

[@bertmathricks2024]

@@BMfoxgaming It should be called Europe - Clash of Abominations

[@uberschpast4575]

Them: How many inaccuracies do you want?
Bytro: yes

[@turic95]

@@uberschpast4575 This must be a meme

[@turic95]

You made a very accurate video from a historical point of view, I almost always played with the Russian Empire, now this is what destabilises me, I have little experience with pan-Asians 😅

[@CarPitStop]

Bytro needs to hire this man

[@BMfoxgaming]

@@CarPitStop I don't want to work in Hamburg though.

[@CarPitStop]

@@BMfoxgaming I was just being sarcastic but it actually isn't a bad idea haha. Perhaps they have some sort of remote jobs.

[@SDAM-]

yeah a small asian map with 22 players would be good

[@BMfoxgaming]

@@SDAM- That would be awesome.

[@alfford6438]

I agree

[@mackonha.m]

2:01 i thought the city was named Gorky in 1939 which would be later renamed back to Nizny after the collapse of Soviet Union

[@patricksmit8887]

The msp also has new composition of stsrting units, AT instead of AA, which makes it slightly more tricky to enter with AC and LT.

[@BMfoxgaming]

@@patricksmit8887 That's a good thing, AT are an underappreciated unit. It protects you against these early rushes. Except for the motorised infantry of course.

[@s.n.r.5168]

Bytro add rivers and that's is good. This thing make map more realistic but they need to add build bridges option too. I think they really need to add rivers in all maps.

[@BMfoxgaming]

@@s.n.r.5168 we'll see what the future holds.

[@patricksmit8887]

I think the rivers are only marginally interesting, now they just cut up areas and delay gameplay for a few nations that had already had an advantage, having a map border, or moutaineous area. Are bridges gonna be implemented or a engineer unit for making a fast crossing?

[@BMfoxgaming]

@@patricksmit8887 That would seem to be the next logical step indeed. Hopefully not through unit cards though.

[@govenormayor87]

@@BMfoxgamingit seems likely that it’ll be unit cards

[@s.n.r.5168]

No bro I am talking about
Bridge building option. Not Army ingeener units option.😂

[@shadowgamertheon4517]

No euphrates river😔

[@BMfoxgaming]

@@shadowgamertheon4517 no need to cut up the middle east even more.

[@GeoSiyurEditz]

I still have the old Europe clash of nations servers, even tho I join a new one

[@BMfoxgaming]

@@GeoSiyurEditz both are still available.

[@thantthit4797]

RUSSIAN empire, as pan asian i bet the devs had a good laugh about that.

[@BMfoxgaming]

@@thantthit4797 probably indeed

[@s.mishaa21]

I don't like what the rivers added. Now it has become more difficult to move ground troops, for example, from Ukraine to the Caucasus, and from the Caucasus to Russia

[@BMfoxgaming]

@@s.mishaa21 But that counts for the two parties.

[@Parsmeme]

I agree that eastern Europe needed better doctrine but pan asian?...
I always imagine how good allies doctrine fit the russian empire

[@BMfoxgaming]

@@Parsmeme The Comintern doctrine is pretty powerful if you play it right.

[@Parsmeme]

@@BMfoxgaming i know, its a *mass production*

[@YourFriendlyOfficeAssistant]

I like the rivers update but some of them shouldn't be navigable so far up.
And pan-Asian in Europe is just stupid. Thanks Bytro for ruining Libya, my favourite country.
But seriously the whole point of Europe: Clash of Nations is to provide a nice small easy map for new players. Pan-Asian shouldn't be on tutorial maps IMO, because it requires more advanced knowledge of game mechanics to play well.
They never reverse their decisions, but I hope they reconsider that one. I swear they mix their bad and good updates deliberately.

[@BMfoxgaming]

@@YourFriendlyOfficeAssistant I couldn't have said it better.

[@JPM-q5s]

Isn't Lybia still strong rushing plains with AC-LT and going through mountains and hills with some arty and protecting coast with subs and NB?

[@YourFriendlyOfficeAssistant]

@@JPM-q5s Yeah but it's not the same.

[@BMfoxgaming]

@@JPM-q5s with pan Asian doctrine yes indeed. Allies with 25% less speed they won't stand a chance. The beginners that enter with the tutorial won't have the knowledge to defeat a Pan Asian player.

[@patricksmit8887]

Mixed feelings with the map,........ still wondering with all these bottlenecks whether it will run the game stale due lack of manoeuvring possibilities and possibilities to create hard blocks on choke points

[@BMfoxgaming]

@@patricksmit8887 you aren't the only one. I've joined a game as Libya today as Pan Asian which is really weird.

[@Ricsi_Pop]

Russian Empire from a historic perspective is a disaster. I will try the map but I also dont like the new 46 player USA map for all those unreal doctrine types.

[@BMfoxgaming]

@@Ricsi_Pop The Russian empire isn't Comintern. How could a dev think that was a good idea 💡

[@turic95]

Simple if no one plays these maps they will be removed

[@BMfoxgaming]

@@turic95 It's a tutorial map so a lot of players will play it.

[@turic95]

@@BMfoxgaming damn