New York is Going to Ban Glock Handguns?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 22 лип 2024
  • No way, that has to be clickbait, right? Well, we wish this was a joke, but no there is a piece of legislation kicking around in Albany that would do exactly that. Washington Gun Law President, William Kirk, discusses NY S 5229, a bill that defines Glock switches, and makes them illegal. No problem, right? Yes, except the statute also bans Glock handguns because Glock switches can be installed to them. So learn how this would work if this becomes law and arm yourself with education today.
    Thanks to Forge Relations.
    If you don't know about Forge Relations and all the tremendous work they do for the 2A community and all the tremendous work they can do for you, visit them at forgerelations.com/
    _____________________________________________________________________________________
    Have a Video Idea? forms.gle/GNCyRw1HRqvAmwik6
    _____________________________________________________________________________________
    Join Right to Bear Today.
    Right to Bear Self-defense protection so that you can protect those you love. Sign up today and if you use the promo code WGL, you will receive 10% off: bit.ly/3Io5T5H
    - Legal Protection for Self-Defense.
    - Confidential Hotline with Your State's Attorney
    - No Caps for Criminal or Civil Defense
    - Covers all forms of self-defense, from a fist to a firearm.
    - Some of the Nation's Most Passionate 2A Attorneys to Defend You
    Visit our good friends at protectwithbear.com/
    Contact Washington Gun Law
    If you have any questions about this topic, or anything else related to what's left of our Second Amendment Rights, remember you can always contact us at:
    www.washingtongunlaw.com or call us directly at 425-765-0487.
    Stay safe.
    ___________________________________________________________________
    Subscribe to us on Rumble. rumble.com/c/WashingtonGunLaw
    Subscribe to us on Patreon. www.patreon.com/WashingtonGunLaw
    Remember, you can follow us at www.washingtongunlaw.com
    Like us on Facebook at WashingtonGunLaw
    Follow us on Twitter @GunWashington

КОМЕНТАРІ • 548

  • @gishjalmr5628
    @gishjalmr5628 2 місяці тому +100

    It's not just Glock, the text says any that can be converted. This will be used to ban all semi-automatics.

    • @devinrussell420
      @devinrussell420 2 місяці тому

      Which would leave us with nothing more than 5 round single action/double action revolvers,5 to 10 round bolt action rifles,and 1 to 7 round pump action 12 guage shot guns;while the totalitarian government and organized criminal enterprises all keeps their semi automatic & fully automatic select fire carbine rifles,machine pistols,and sub machine guns.If we want better guns in the future;we are all going to have to make acquaintances with people who sells all types of guns,on the black market.

    • @FactoryFugitive
      @FactoryFugitive 2 місяці тому +3

      Correct, any semi-auto that they deem "convertible". Coming from politicians that know absolutely nothing about firearms or the 2A.

    • @MBsr5
      @MBsr5 2 місяці тому

      @@FactoryFugitive firearms companies should just bribe them

    • @uwize5897
      @uwize5897 2 місяці тому

      @@FactoryFugitiveany semi auto can be converted easily... its illegal but very easy

  • @c.curtisclements770
    @c.curtisclements770 2 місяці тому +150

    Well, we were all just told by a judge in New York that the Second Amendment didn't apply in that state, so why is this new infringement a surprise? Remember, none of this has anything to do with public safety . . . it is ALL AND ONLY about civilian disarmament.

    • @Tomcat8911
      @Tomcat8911 2 місяці тому +11

      Can't be made a slave if armed.

    • @garywillis9528
      @garywillis9528 2 місяці тому

      The point is it's a conspiracy! Chicago has a lawsuit, the Dems in New York are that radical, and know their courts will uphold anything they do!

    • @AGFrontYT
      @AGFrontYT 2 місяці тому +4

      @@Tomcat8911 people without Rights are called slaves, so, bingo

    • @Marinealver
      @Marinealver 2 місяці тому +1

      I'm still waiting for Bill to do a video on that. Turns out this one still omits that little detail.

    • @aquariumdude7829
      @aquariumdude7829 2 місяці тому +1

      ​@@Tomcat8911They turned everybody into slaves under the covid flim-flam. Guns didn't help one iota.

  • @wsmith3849
    @wsmith3849 2 місяці тому +53

    Switches are illegal and felons having firearms is illegal. So let’s go after lawful owners. Makes sense. 🤦

    • @wandery2k
      @wandery2k 2 місяці тому +1

      Criminals scare them. Law abiding citizens, not so much.

    • @mp2764
      @mp2764 2 місяці тому

      @@wandery2k 😏

  • @dstrick31487
    @dstrick31487 2 місяці тому +31

    The whole point of this is to set a precedent for “readily convertible” to go after all semi auto platforms

  • @daniellekelly4376
    @daniellekelly4376 2 місяці тому +20

    All the gun companies in the world have to quit selling their guns to all the state agencies in the state of New York

    • @MinorSharpFifth
      @MinorSharpFifth 2 місяці тому

      All the state agencies of all blue states, actually.

  • @user-wg8zj7dq1g
    @user-wg8zj7dq1g 2 місяці тому +41

    Would banning Glocks by name constitute a Bill of Attainder?
    "Pistol Converters" are already banned under federal law. WTF?

    • @Clearanceman2
      @Clearanceman2 2 місяці тому +4

      Murder is also already illegal but that doesn't stop the gun banners.

  • @scottdoran3112
    @scottdoran3112 2 місяці тому +119

    You don't have to worry, Kathy Hochul said poor black kids don't know what a computer is.

    • @AGFrontYT
      @AGFrontYT 2 місяці тому

      ALL gun control is racist and all supporters of gun control are bigots.

    • @georgeclontd4984
      @georgeclontd4984 2 місяці тому

      Hochul can't name an amendment. That how ignorant she is..

    • @catman5546
      @catman5546 2 місяці тому

      What a insult to the Black race !!😖😖😖

    • @adrianwilson7193
      @adrianwilson7193 2 місяці тому

      Hochul doesn't know the Constitution.
      " SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED"

  • @hoosierplowboy5299
    @hoosierplowboy5299 2 місяці тому +23

    If they can ban one kind/brand of gun, they can ban ANY kind/brand of gun...

    • @Sirgromulus
      @Sirgromulus 2 місяці тому +8

      That's their goal.

    • @devinrussell420
      @devinrussell420 2 місяці тому

      ​@@SirgromulusThen people will just resort to either buying the guns they want off of the black market;or they will just buy a lathe,drill press,some metal rod,nuts,bolts,and springs of various sizes at their local hardware store,and a copy of P.A. Luty's book Expedient Homemade Firearms,and just build their guns from scratch.

  • @MRLUGNUTS
    @MRLUGNUTS 2 місяці тому +144

    Then the cops shouldn't be able to carry glock either.

    • @vicdiaz5180
      @vicdiaz5180 2 місяці тому +10

      Hey!! You’re making too much sense.

    • @Badger77722
      @Badger77722 2 місяці тому +11

      The bill already has cutouts for LEOs and military. Can't afford to have the LEO unions get upset, if they went against the bill it might have a much rougher time passing. As is, it's pretty much a slam-dunk in NY.

    • @aquariumdude7829
      @aquariumdude7829 2 місяці тому +1

      Dude, I don't care anymore. New Yorkers voted for this and brought it all on themselves. They own it now!

    • @monkeymouse1403
      @monkeymouse1403 2 місяці тому +10

      @@Badger77722 Glock does not have to sell to the NY PD or anyone else "carved out" if they don't to. Might as well write the entire state off as a loss instead of fighting this in court. In fact, any police weapons sent in for service need to be confiscated by Glock also.

    • @Marinealver
      @Marinealver 2 місяці тому +1

      The Cops don't need 2nd Amendment rights because the State which has all the guns gives them guns.

  • @richardkev3077
    @richardkev3077 2 місяці тому +36

    What prevents “convertible pistol” from being interpreted as any and all semi-auto pistols? After all, with the right modifications, any semi-auto pistol can become full-auto. AND; the word “Glock” is never used.

    • @dwwolf4636
      @dwwolf4636 2 місяці тому +6

      Nothing, obviously. That's the entire raison d'être of this legislation.

    • @Eddie87Grant
      @Eddie87Grant 2 місяці тому +6

      Sir, I agree this action will bust open the doors for all strike fired pistols and if this garbage of a bill gets passed my state of Connecticut who loves passing gun control laws feast upon this like fish in chum filled waters!!! This also goes for all the other blue states too.

    • @Eddie87Grant
      @Eddie87Grant 2 місяці тому

      @@dwwolf4636yep.

    • @Eddie87Grant
      @Eddie87Grant 2 місяці тому +3

      @@dwwolf4636yes you’re spot on.

  • @silent4676
    @silent4676 2 місяці тому +31

    I'm going to go ahead and guess that they put in an exemption for law enforcement and government officials.

    • @gishjalmr5628
      @gishjalmr5628 2 місяці тому +5

      They did.

    • @silent4676
      @silent4676 2 місяці тому +5

      I am Jack's complete lack of surprise.

    • @alanmeyers3957
      @alanmeyers3957 2 місяці тому +2

      Of course, and we know that a retired law enforcement officer would never do anything illegal with a machine gun, right!

    • @Marinealver
      @Marinealver 2 місяці тому +3

      And their security details.
      It isn't a matter of if they will abolish the 2nd Amendment but WHEN.

  • @robertcuny934
    @robertcuny934 2 місяці тому +14

    Someone at Glock must have refused "compensation" to someone very important.

  • @michaelpfister1283
    @michaelpfister1283 2 місяці тому +19

    How many times do they have to create unconstitutional laws before they themselves can be defined as criminals?

    • @Marinealver
      @Marinealver 2 місяці тому +4

      How can the Criminals be criminals when they write the laws?

    • @jasoncarey157
      @jasoncarey157 2 місяці тому +1

      When we form milita

  • @DG-yc2cx
    @DG-yc2cx 2 місяці тому +30

    Did the NY legislators buy stock in S&W?

  • @Coloradodogmama
    @Coloradodogmama 2 місяці тому +27

    Hey New York : 🖕

  • @user-qn2fk4xy6w
    @user-qn2fk4xy6w 2 місяці тому +52

    The bill doesn't mention Glock, it applies to ALL semi-automatic pistols.

    • @Semperf11
      @Semperf11 2 місяці тому +2

      Yea

    • @rickbruceroche2038
      @rickbruceroche2038 2 місяці тому +4

      Actually it applies to ALL automatics - if there is a way to convert to automatic, it is banned.

    • @teresamoore15
      @teresamoore15 2 місяці тому +1

      How about the Webley .455 auto revolver? Yes.

    • @RedHuntsman
      @RedHuntsman 2 місяці тому +2

      @@rickbruceroche2038 most all semi autos can be converted to automatic.

    • @kenkellar2246
      @kenkellar2246 2 місяці тому +1

      really?😮

  • @jacobdelgado7343
    @jacobdelgado7343 2 місяці тому +7

    Remember when they said they just wanted to go after the AR platform?

    • @Marinealver
      @Marinealver 2 місяці тому +3

      And an AR-15 is a Civilian Grade Weapon (not a military one).

  • @juice6459
    @juice6459 2 місяці тому +9

    Look for the definition of 'convertible' to be expanded to all semi-automatics eventually.

  • @johnj1763
    @johnj1763 2 місяці тому +46

    They're going to push the envelope. Supreme court is asleep unfortunately.

    • @badboysfpv1724
      @badboysfpv1724 2 місяці тому +2

      no there not they are very very smart people couple weeks we have a huge decision coming from the big court

    • @badboysfpv1724
      @badboysfpv1724 2 місяці тому +4

      the big court has already said hand guns cant be banned

    • @DaleChurchward
      @DaleChurchward 2 місяці тому

      The Supreme Court isn't asleep, it's just that legislatures can pass laws far faster than the Supreme Court can overturn. Also, the government doesn't have any respect for the Supreme Court.

    • @alanmeyers3957
      @alanmeyers3957 2 місяці тому

      @MaxNe4545Get It On!

    • @aquariumdude7829
      @aquariumdude7829 2 місяці тому +3

      ​@@badboysfpv1724They don't care and don't obey them anyway.

  • @simmo1567
    @simmo1567 2 місяці тому +7

    You should absolutely do a video with Langley Outdoor Academy and the Military Arms Channel.

    • @mafirearmsafety
      @mafirearmsafety 2 місяці тому

      That would be the equivalent of two news people sitting in front of the camera taking turns reading the news when all that is really needed is one person……

  • @charlesnoneofyourbuis5819
    @charlesnoneofyourbuis5819 2 місяці тому +11

    How can they make a law that prohibits a handgun that is "In Common Use", as decribed in the Heller Decision?

    • @herbertbrown119
      @herbertbrown119 2 місяці тому

      New York politicians are like honey badgers. They don’t care.

    • @aquariumdude7829
      @aquariumdude7829 2 місяці тому +1

      Because they don't care about Heller, Bruen, or any of that other worthless, legal mumbo-jumbo!

    • @oblivionsa7973
      @oblivionsa7973 2 місяці тому

      It's easy when Democrats can seemingly just ignore whatever laws and court rulings they don't like.

  • @chrisdimaio6796
    @chrisdimaio6796 2 місяці тому +8

    I’ve been saying this for last 18 months even before the legislators were going to discuss this…if you ever wanted a Glock or multiple Glocks buy them now

    • @Ferd414
      @Ferd414 2 місяці тому +2

      FMDA17.stl + Ender3V2 (or equivalent) + filament = As many Glock-alikes as you care to have :)

    • @alanmeyers3957
      @alanmeyers3957 2 місяці тому +1

      Glocks are not going anywhere.

    • @sksjustice7693
      @sksjustice7693 2 місяці тому

      It would not matter in NY State. Just like semiautomatic rifles, that met their definition of assault weapons. And magazines holding more than 10 rounds. Glocks will be banned with no grandfathering in. When the Safe act was passed. Gun owners in NY were told to sell them out of state. Or turn them all in.

    • @stevelyons2744
      @stevelyons2744 2 місяці тому

      Space out those purchases. Big Fudder is watching.

  • @alphadoccrsd
    @alphadoccrsd 2 місяці тому +6

    Any fire arm can be converted so this will allow them to then Ban all weapons

  • @ericarachel55
    @ericarachel55 2 місяці тому +8

    they are talking about ALL semi auto's the way it is written and opens up consfication from us, the law abiding gun owners

    • @BlackoutPatriot
      @BlackoutPatriot 2 місяці тому +2

      Then it's time to use your 2A the way the constitution intended it to be used

  • @americanrn125
    @americanrn125 2 місяці тому +4

    The people that vote or sponsor these laws should have to demonstrate personally, on their own, without any assistance, how these products make a semi-automatic into a machine gun, then requiring them to actually fire this converted product in the manner they BELIEVE it’s supposed to work according to the propaganda they use to describe said product.

  • @jimwjohnq.public
    @jimwjohnq.public 2 місяці тому +5

    Banning something is one thing. Enforcing, or trying to enforce that ban is something altogether different.

    • @georgeolschewski4651
      @georgeolschewski4651 2 місяці тому

      Who's to say a state wouldn't pull any 4473s to determine who bought what, and start knocking on doors? Sure, police are overwhelmingly outnumbered by armed citizens, but does anybody want to be the test case?

  • @jw7122
    @jw7122 2 місяці тому +5

    Its important to note that this will not stop. These activist judges don't really care about the rule of law or the constitution. It doesn't matter what the supreme court says. As long as there are no repercussions for judges who are violating civil rights and the constitution then this will continue forever until rights become privileges and then nothing at all. The law, logic and reasoning will continue to be ignored for the safety of the public and our democracy.

  • @BlackoutPatriot
    @BlackoutPatriot 2 місяці тому +4

    So we will be sure to see the police not carrying Glocks in NY right

    • @Marinealver
      @Marinealver 2 місяці тому +1

      Well if the get rid of NYPD yes.
      Question is who would be their replacements?

  • @That_guy_Kyle
    @That_guy_Kyle 2 місяці тому +2

    Why does NYC and NY get away with this stuff

  • @robzipprian4992
    @robzipprian4992 2 місяці тому +4

    Except the crooks and illeagals, they can keep theirs.

  • @clarkgriswold4096
    @clarkgriswold4096 2 місяці тому +1

    Thank you Sir William!

  • @Stan_L
    @Stan_L 2 місяці тому

    Great video! Thanks for sharing.

  • @TheFiremanJoe
    @TheFiremanJoe 2 місяці тому +2

    Tyrants gotta Tyrant…

  • @connorvankalmthout469
    @connorvankalmthout469 2 місяці тому

    William, highly appreciate your videos. Wondering if you can do a video on the ban of “ghost guns” in Nevada soon? The new law bans the sale and possession of all unserialized firearms. This all comes after the poly80 (Dayton, NV based company) lawsuit which was aimed at preventing felons from obtaining (building) firearms but somehow, this law passed which prevents any Nevadan of possessing or manufacturing their own personal firearms anymore from a parts kit or 80% because they lack serial numbers. Hoping to get your opinion and presentation on this matter and many Nevadans are clueless what to do right now. It doesn’t appear there is a grandfather clause or a way to obtain a serial number for manufacture a personal firearm. Thank you!

  • @seamasrigh2162
    @seamasrigh2162 2 місяці тому +3

    The hits just keep on coming. They will never stop until they win.

    • @Marinealver
      @Marinealver 2 місяці тому +3

      Sadly they are winning, but that doesn't mean they are going to stop.

  • @nunyabusiness1755
    @nunyabusiness1755 2 місяці тому +1

    This would make NY an even larger black market. This is probably the beginning of a larger attempt to ban all semi auto pistols. Just about any semi auto can be made full auto if a person has mechanical knowledge. CZ and Beretta have a full auto version of their most popular model

  • @Desperado3248
    @Desperado3248 2 місяці тому +1

    The challenge should be that any firearm that leaves the factory and is lawfully sold as a semiautomatic in function only , cannot be banned. It is only a felony to sell or possess a pistol that has been modified to fire in the fully automatic mode

  • @FelixClark-xt1wf
    @FelixClark-xt1wf 2 місяці тому +2

    They want to ban all semiautomatic pistols.

  • @R3TR0--93
    @R3TR0--93 2 місяці тому +1

    this still won't stop criminals

  • @rossfelton1955
    @rossfelton1955 2 місяці тому +2

    Any semiautomatic gun can be modified to full auto. Actually with a solenoid or a small motor any revolver can be made full auto.

  • @sue_downing555
    @sue_downing555 2 місяці тому +1

    doesn't the converter device with design variations, apply and include other guns, which can be converted to fire full auto
    ie, copies of the Glock operating sys or fire control sys, after all, manufacturers copy or clone Glocks.

  • @clints7834
    @clints7834 2 місяці тому +1

    Hi-Point can't be sued because nobody ever hit their target. Most cases the bullet won't leave the gun.

  • @williamwilliams7706
    @williamwilliams7706 2 місяці тому +1

    Thanks Wiiliam. This is a foot in the door law. Any other pistol or fan-able revolver is next on the list if this law sticks.

  • @harleysteele7025
    @harleysteele7025 2 місяці тому

    can you do a video on building an AR with a binary trigger in FL because i think it only covers modification

  • @Guns.and.Mooneyes
    @Guns.and.Mooneyes 2 місяці тому

    Thanks William Kirk

  • @johnmcmullen813
    @johnmcmullen813 2 місяці тому +1

    Wouldn’t this basically make any similar striker fire pistol illegal as well by being potentially “convertible”? The number of pistols just based on the third gen Glock down to interchangeable parts is large indeed.

  • @dougjimison5026
    @dougjimison5026 2 місяці тому

    Video suggestions: crew served weapons in history. Some where in the back of my head I thought I learned in history somewhere that in the civil war cannon were owned by civilians. It might make an interesting video if you looked at the history of crew served weapons like cannon and if that history could be enough to drive a challenge to NFA.

  • @jayvandenbush9741
    @jayvandenbush9741 2 місяці тому

    Hey, I had a single shot revolver that when pulled correctly out, could be feathered to shot faster than a semi- auto. I was accurate doing it. 5 of 5 in 2 inches at 50ft. How can they block a single action that fast.

  • @user-fj7vm9fz2h
    @user-fj7vm9fz2h 2 місяці тому +1

    Convertible pistols? Hello Sig wake up!!! It’s All semi pistols that have a screw on them. That you can swap out PARTS to remake the pistol.

  • @Dreday40-sd3nl
    @Dreday40-sd3nl 2 місяці тому

    Is protect with bear a insurance like uscca or attorneys like AOR?

  • @ianrandall7667
    @ianrandall7667 2 місяці тому +1

    Not just Glocks! Many other pistols, e.g., many Berretas, AR and AK based pistols, have "converters" available, e.g., DIAS, Lightning Links, coat hangers, rubber bands, shoe laces, worn or modified fire control components,.... Just about everything will be illegal because nearly anything can be used to modify a firearm and become a "converter". Even a rock or sidewalk could be used to reprofile a component!

  • @dfb1111
    @dfb1111 2 місяці тому

    Thank you sir.

  • @rayspencer8872
    @rayspencer8872 2 місяці тому +1

    That sounds like Banning Ford or Chevrolet from the USA. WTF.

  • @PatBarrett2663
    @PatBarrett2663 2 місяці тому

    Just wondering- how can the state single out one particular manufacturer? These trigger switches don’t fit any other guns ? Or does
    No manufacturer make them for any of the other hundreds of companies that make semi-automatic pistols?

  • @leahcimthgirw3163
    @leahcimthgirw3163 2 місяці тому

    So would this be a case of buy it now while you can

  • @Marinealver
    @Marinealver 2 місяці тому +4

    The 2nd Amendment doesn't exist there. The Judge said so!

  • @DanielMartinez-lz3ot
    @DanielMartinez-lz3ot 2 місяці тому

    can't any semi-auto be converted with an auto-sear?

  • @16ft2in
    @16ft2in 2 місяці тому +1

    End all contract with official entities in NY state.

  • @raybrindos4514
    @raybrindos4514 2 місяці тому +3

    How about an update on Washington's weapons ban.

    • @Marinealver
      @Marinealver 2 місяці тому +1

      Weapons are Banned!
      There's your update.

  • @theberrybest
    @theberrybest 2 місяці тому +1

    What's the difference? New York pretty much banned anyone from owning a gun, period.

  • @leonardswintek864
    @leonardswintek864 2 місяці тому +1

    From the AWB to this it is all part of their plan. They want all semi autos. Then all repeaters, lever action, pump action or revolvers. All is their end game

  • @jerryprzybyla6868
    @jerryprzybyla6868 2 місяці тому

    Does this include any law enforcement agency from using the Glock?

  • @michaelstern1954
    @michaelstern1954 2 місяці тому

    What about the transfer of a pre ban Glock?

  • @jcapile
    @jcapile 2 місяці тому

    Can’t all semi auto pistols be converted to full auto? Would this lead to semi auto pistol ban?

  • @obedlopez7589
    @obedlopez7589 2 місяці тому

    Ty

  • @crushingexistentialism
    @crushingexistentialism 2 місяці тому +1

    I guess they missed NYRPA v. Bruen even though it literally happened in their state

    • @Marinealver
      @Marinealver 2 місяці тому +1

      Or they just don't give a 💩

  • @mcpig3240
    @mcpig3240 2 місяці тому +1

    Unlawful restraint of trade by a State in violation of the Interstate Commerce clause.

  • @leonardjanda6181
    @leonardjanda6181 2 місяці тому +2

    Take them away from the police officers too if they’re gonna play this game and see what happens common use firearm.

  • @coreydarr8464
    @coreydarr8464 2 місяці тому

    They make Browning HI-Power pistol to Converter for full-auto!

  • @stevenj2817
    @stevenj2817 2 місяці тому

    This is nuts. I sure as hell would have moved out of NY years ago.

  • @THall-vi8cp
    @THall-vi8cp 2 місяці тому

    The bill isn't linked in the description.

  • @geremypelleran8487
    @geremypelleran8487 2 місяці тому

    I bet the sale of 3D printers will skyrocket in New York

  • @DC-fy1xb
    @DC-fy1xb 2 місяці тому +3

    I live in Bronx NY I got my gun license when I went to pick my gun they told me I have to contact FBI before they can give me my Glock 19 gen 5 which I did now they have denied me from owning a gun
    What can I do?

  • @robertfoertsch
    @robertfoertsch 2 місяці тому +1

    Excellent Analysis, Deployed Worldwide Through My Deep Learning AI Research Library… Thank You.

  • @chuckclark9464
    @chuckclark9464 2 місяці тому +1

    👍👍👍👍👍 why doesn’t it surprise me.

  • @Inkushu
    @Inkushu 2 місяці тому

    Convertible pistols is pretty stupid and won’t pass a stink test. Because my Acura can go 150mph without exploding, should they ban it because it can be converted with a turbo to go even faster?

  • @lilbfrom094princeton8
    @lilbfrom094princeton8 2 місяці тому

    It’s getting to a point where people are just going to stop paying taxes real soon

  • @On2wls
    @On2wls 2 місяці тому

    If that is approved, ALL gun manufacturers need to pull out of NY ..... including supplying all law enforcement.

  • @barkingfrog27
    @barkingfrog27 2 місяці тому

    ? Do I have a duty/ do I HAVE to retreat if someone attacks me ….?
    If I am in public and someone is or is about to assault me, do I have to retreat, step away….?

    • @MrSparty8
      @MrSparty8 2 місяці тому

      Depends where u live.

  • @user-ri8ir5zb1c
    @user-ri8ir5zb1c Місяць тому

    I got my first Glock when I was on the job in NYC, I guess there will be a LE exemption

  • @guymobbley8324
    @guymobbley8324 2 місяці тому

    Where selecting just one manufacture of pistols ?

  • @Inkushu
    @Inkushu 2 місяці тому +14

    Bruen, injunction go brrrrrrrr

    • @aquariumdude7829
      @aquariumdude7829 2 місяці тому +1

      Bruen = meaningless mumbo-jumbo they don't obey anyway.

    • @Marinealver
      @Marinealver 2 місяці тому +2

      Does it?

    • @aquariumdude7829
      @aquariumdude7829 2 місяці тому +1

      @@Marinealver No. It says nothing and will go nowhere.

    • @Inkushu
      @Inkushu 2 місяці тому

      @@Marinealver it hasn’t even been signed into law, but expect it to be killed if that happens, if not before. The convertibles clause is stupid and unconstitutional and targeting. They should go after switches, not guns.

    • @aquariumdude7829
      @aquariumdude7829 2 місяці тому

      @@Inkushu Dude, the Dems don't obey the courts.

  • @nonegiven5295
    @nonegiven5295 2 місяці тому

    Ummmm, isn't a modified sear a conversion piece to make any firearm an automatic weapon?

  • @hyper8545
    @hyper8545 2 місяці тому +1

    No glock? Hello sig 😂

  • @hazyskunk429
    @hazyskunk429 2 місяці тому

    Better get these rich people in line before they get robotics in line. Those have no morals or oath to the law.

  • @jfriar
    @jfriar 2 місяці тому

    Should drive up the price everywhere else😂

  • @ryanmazk812
    @ryanmazk812 2 місяці тому

    I wonder if this will drop Glock prices in Va. lol

  • @leoy5314
    @leoy5314 2 місяці тому +1

    Then Glock clone slides and Glock clone frames are also banned?
    There’s hundreds of thousand clones out there.

  • @melios1967
    @melios1967 2 місяці тому

    Come get it.

  • @nickg0411
    @nickg0411 2 місяці тому

    hey you are in my state!

  • @scdrescher1
    @scdrescher1 2 місяці тому +1

    Hold on…you’re not allowed to own them AND you’re not allowed to dispose of them? So you’re only allowed to surrender them to your law enforcement agency? Then they can sell them to the real criminals. Sounds good! Let’s sign it in.

  • @markreed9398
    @markreed9398 2 місяці тому +1

    Glock needs to refuse to sell Glocks to the states at the local and state LE that want to ban them.

  • @benmaye1
    @benmaye1 2 місяці тому +1

    Seems to me they are closing the barn door after the horse has run away

    • @oblivionsa7973
      @oblivionsa7973 2 місяці тому

      No, just another pretext to push one step closer to their goal of complete civilian disarmament. The proof is always right in the bill. They lay these things out like they are biological weapons capable of destroying the world and only suitable for committing mass murder that no one should ever be allowed to have. Then they follow it with: but it's okay for us to have them.

  • @rodneymills5581
    @rodneymills5581 2 місяці тому

    “Yeah “ tell the Crooks,”Einstein “

  • @davidcobbs1534
    @davidcobbs1534 2 місяці тому +1

    It's not just glock. They are banning any semiautomatic that is "convertible"

  • @MistyShadows
    @MistyShadows 2 місяці тому

    What does "dispose of" mean in this context? Does this make getting rid of a firearm illegal?
    Also, is it "(transports or ships) as merchandise" or "(transports) or (ships as merchandise)".
    A more clear reading for the former would imo be "who transports or ships, as merchandise, a convertible pistol".
    I could see this easily being read such that you are banned from transporting your firearms.
    You can still own it, just not take it anywhere, and knowing the NY DA, they might just read it this way on purpose.

  • @triggerdsilence
    @triggerdsilence 2 місяці тому +1

    The problem is the bill refers to convertible pistols so this is not glock specific its a move to ban ALL semi-automatic pistols as convertible pistols are any pistol that can be converted.!!
    Waay overstepping not to mention creating class of people by exempting certain folks.

  • @Clearanceman2
    @Clearanceman2 2 місяці тому

    William Kirk out in the free USA!

  • @jwdundon
    @jwdundon 2 місяці тому

    It NEVER bans what you own ... That ALWAYS always always cones in phase 2.

  • @kaceyle4706
    @kaceyle4706 2 місяці тому

    H&K will be next and then 1911 ?