Drink Potions As A Bonus Action | 2024 Player's Handbook | D&D
Вставка
- Опубліковано 28 чер 2024
- Preorder the new 2024 Core Rulebook Digital & Physical bundle on D&D Beyond dndbeyond.link/preorder_2024_d...
Preorder the new 2024 Core Rulebook Digital bundle dndbeyond.link/preorder_digit...
Preorder the new 2024 Core Rulebook Physical bundle dndbeyond.link/preorder_physi...
Preorder the new 2024 Player's Handbook on D&D Beyond dndbeyond.link/preorder_newpl...
Subscribe to D&D Beyond dndbeyond.link/subscribe_dndb...
Introducing the 2024 Player's Handbook, the new and improved guide for fifth edition DUNGEONS & DRAGONS. Packed with endless character options, striking illustrations, and a streamlined design, every part of this 384-page book is a joy to experience.
Embark on an epic adventure 10 years in the making.
Create compelling characters with optimized rules, updated spells and equipment, and expanded player options. With an improved layout and organization, you have all the information you need right at your fingertips. Your adventure begins now!
Pre-order the 2024 Digital & Physical Core Rulebook Bundle and save $60!
All three of the 2024 Core Rulebooks are available for pre-order as a Digital & Physical bundle. Grab them today to get the interactive digital version and the beautiful hardcover version of each one upon release, as well as fully unlocking their contents on D&D BEYOND. Shipping is free for this bundle!
Pre-order the 2024 Digital & Physical Core Rulebook Bundle to receive these exclusive D&D collectibles:
#dnd #dungeonsanddragons #ttrpg - Розваги
😮I liked the way The Dungeon Dudes did potions. If you did it as a bonus action you rolled for healing and if you did it out of combat/or as an action you got full helimg no mater what.
I always thought Monty did set amounts per potion cuz Drakkenforce/ Duskwardens don't have a cleric on the team. And taking potion was a bonus action, but giving a potion to another was an action
The issue is I want to encourage my players to use potions in combat. I feel this could make people just wait until out of combat
@@Teinvebut if they could choose to wait, then they didn't need the potion?
I like too that, post fight if you don't get to short rest. you then get more value out of it.
The best version of the rule is roll to heal if you use a bonus action or get the full healing if you use an action.
💯
Oh that's clever, I'm using that.
I agree, my group has been using this version for several years and it is very helpful.
Not really. It'll just use a lot of game time making it more tedious then useful
"nice, I'm almost playable now"-Alchemist
joking but i do hope the wording includes the Experimental Elixir feature there even with Artificer not being in the book. (sure most good DM are already allowing it but yeah)
Waiting artificer are getting taken back out?
@@Teinve They're not one of the 12 classes in the new PHB
@@davidcarnan1270 rip to artificer players
I hope that they also decrease the RAW price of potions, I feel like players don't invest gold into them for that reason.
They will probably give clear rules for Cleric, Druid, and Paladin player characters to craft them at half price.
I allow the 1st health potion taken in a day to be a free action. I allow the rest to be taken as a bonus action. However, if 1 PC gives it to another PC, that takes an action. I'm also thinking of allowing them to take it as an action to regain the max healing.
So I can make 1 slash in one turn in a fraction of a second, and then as bonus, find a and take a drink from my loaded backpack, unscrew, drink, put screw back on and repack as a bonus? This rule is about cool topping realistic.
Didn’t BG3 already do this?
Yes because it was one of the most popular Homebrew rules a lot of dungeon Masters evoked rule zero and ruled that potions, especially healing potions could be taken as a bonus action.
My house rule has been bonus action roll the dice. Action get max dice for the healing amount.
Looks great, except for the payment structure and that books can not be redeemed online, so you need to buy it twice!
I thought Matt Mercer was the first who used this rule. Apparently it was a famous table rule even before Crit Role
So I can make 1 slash in one turn in a fraction of a second, and then as bonus, find a and take a drink from my loaded backpack, unscrew, drink, put screw back on and repack as a bonus? This rule is about cool topping realistic.
@@KootFloris Lol. If it's a medieval setting I would expect it to have a cork instead of a screw. Pop screw, drink, throw bottle away. I've never had a game where it was ruled that they leave me with an empty bottle ever after drinking a potion. Have you?
Let's be honest, we all homeruled it like that anyway.
Hallelujah
Everything has been enhanced...unless you're a paladin 😅
Yeah, but did they fix monks
DANG ALRIGHT THEN
Sure, because 5e characters are famously fragile and prone to dying unexpectedly... [eyeroll]
STOP using the word ENHANCED for EVERYTHING
Why not? This is D&D 5E, or Five 𝓔𝓷𝓱𝓪𝓷𝓬𝓮𝓭.
@@LocalMaple
5e stands for 5th edition and THIS is for oneDND which is what the "new" system is called, hope this helps! :)
@@skiisk 1 that's only the playtest name
2 it is now and will forever be 5th enhanced
Except classes which feel worse for several in pretty substantial ways.
I'm hoping this rule applies to all potions, not just healing potions.
Some potions replicate entire spells, invisibility, haste, spiderclimb ect. Those should absolutely be full actions. I hope this is only healing potions
@@westeralex1 considering potions are a consumable, it makes sense for them to be a more compelling option IMO. Since the DM controls their distribution for the most part, there shouldn't be a balance issue caused by that, unless the crafting rules have some major stuff in them that we haven't seen.
It's more the fact that many potions are pretty similar to spell scrolls and that makes them just a better version of a spell scroll in many cases because it also takes away concentration in many cases like what I mentioned before. It's not about balance it's about making scrolls worse than potions in even more circumstances
Drinking a potion is casting a spell, and most spells that potions emulate take an Action to cast. This change makes drinking a potion version of a spell better than casting the actual spell itself, which is why I never used this silly house rule. But now it's canon. Sigh.
I love how he makes it seem that something the community made is somehow to his credit lol
Literal start of the video is "many people do this already", they are just changing the new rules into the popular version so that new players fan experience the best version
hay guys we're now "giving" you doods permission to do the thing you were already doing.
-wizards of the coast.
Just out of curiosity, will there be a new draconomicon that would allow players to be a dragon or include all dragons and draconic races?
What?
Closest you're getting is Fizban's Treasury of Dragons. Outright playing dragons power wise is outside of 5e's scope, and honestly... Good
I understand capitulating to what people are doing. But is it just me who feels this is truly boring game design, and pretty useless - if you're writing the rules the way people have already been playing for 10 years, why are we spending £60 on new books?
Or you can just change the in game rulings and avoid buying another 2k worth of books.
About time.
Not really an enhancement... in the DMG you say whatever house rules you want to play with goes, so people made house rules that were popular, and now you've just decided to use those instead of what was originally written?
I think that's part of the point of this book. Outside of revising classes and species and stuff, they're taking a look at the rules themselves and changing things to fit what is most accepted.
If the vast majority of people ignore a rule the way it's written, then most of the time, it's probably a bad rule that needs to be changed. This way, now people can say, "You can drink a potion as a bonus action," instead of, "Normally, potions are an action, but I think that's stupid, and I allow you to drink them as a bonus action."
Nooo!!! Make this an Optional Rule!! First off, the header states "potions" as in all potions. If this is correct, you can now cast a Fireball and then drink a potion of Haste...or Invis, or Fly...TWO spell actions! If this means only for Heal Potions, do not be so confusing with such a title. Still, what creature with even half an intelligence won't be carrying around a ton of heal potions if he can hit you with his sword and drink Greater Healing. And what about the Fighter with a sword in hand and a shield, any wording on needing a free hand to grab a potion and open its stopper? I'm not happy with this one.
Local man upset that potions are actually widely valuable and useful now.
Yes, let me drink an entire apple sized bottle in 6 seconds. And still swing a sword or cast a spell that requires a full incantation.
Logically speaking we should be able to drink potions as a free action. You can drink an entire flagon of ale but not a teeny little bottle of magic drink? If not for the game balance id let my players do it as their free object interation
Yeah, this was not necessarily a good change.
It’s all great for players but what about balancing the game so DMs can challenge their players.
DM's get to make the shops players find, stack the loot that is loot able, set costs in the world's economy.... So you make less healing potions available for your party if you would like this limited? This isn't hard to balance.