It was designed by some very skilled people with no idea of historical accuracy sitting in Wargaming HQ. They designed a 122 mm autoloader instead of a 183 mm derpgun
The fv4005 has the 183 instead of the 122mm and the fv4005 was not use cause it has alot of recoils and if it fire it can dmg something in the tank but idk and Fv4005 Was first design with no boxy turret and has an autoloader It was called fv4005 Stage 1 And change In the 1945 or 1980 I forgot but it was change to fv4005 stage 2 with the 183mm gun
@@manuelmayr8831 ik it was Wargaming planning to make the fv215b 183 for fun cause it has armor but Has lower aim than the fv4005 stage 2 fun fact I'm talking about Wot pc
Hd it’s been a long time i commented on your video And i am glad this channel is still going at full ammo and health *You know what i mean* Goodluck and don’t let jageroo ammorack you
In a 1V1 at close combat the Death Star will usually win, but at long range the FV4005 has a high chance of winning if he spots the Death Star first. But this 1V1 is not realistic because it does not include outside factors like teammates. So such a scenario is unlikely to happen in a real match. In a real match, the FV4005 performs better, not just against the Death Star, but in general.
Not really. Every shot is an RNG fest to hit and pen, and not go ghost shell, and having 4 requires a long poke time. High Alpha on one shot makes for less RNG and better poking. However ther Jag is better than the DS and the Badger is better than the SB so there is no reason to run either.
@@Umbreona it mostly need 2 clips anyway and with that quick clip relaod consumable, it can dump out its shells quickly and the 183 is going to suffer most of the times
@@Umbreona Most cases 4005 will get 3/4 shots most of the time assume one of their shot is a miss fire. That still 1230 ave alpha damage she delivered. Plus 4005 Users (if they're smart enough) will use Spall Liner so it alrd a Get out of Jail free Card for her.
for every single 4005 player who watch this video PLS USE YOUR SPALL LINER i saw countless 4005 just yoloing and dealt no more than their 1 full clip damage, especially by HE/HESH there's nothing bad coming from spall liner,it can save your toilet-paper turret in a lot of scenarios
In my opinion. FV4005 should be a second Death Star. I hate this autoloader! Soo dumb! 😒 This game is unrealistic anyway! But i like the tank to be atleast more realisitic than now! Or more accurate not realsitic! Make the gun aim bad and also make the gun hit its shots rarely. Similar to the current 183. And maybe nerd the speed and take speed booster away. And make the reload 22 seconds. 😮 Ans make the camo none. 😂
IDK Why Wargaming Decide to put an Auto-Loader at the FV 4005 despite the fact that FV 4005 is equip with the same 183 mm Gun like the FV 215B and in WOT PC its just a normal one shot same as FV 215B
4005 will win most times bc is fast and has something that 183 doesn’t, the camo rating, Im UsernameNotLoaded, i had so much fun, i hope ill get into next ones to
6:10....my average gameplay
2:49 😎 It's 183 mine
And 10:19 ye thx for +1200 dmg really" .LoL
Pls e100 vs vk 72
@@geralynvillegas1511 he already do that
We all have those days. I felt that too
Same here😅
The amount of rage I saw there was 😂2:46
It was at this moment I knew... I F up
The FV 215B 183 is slow in action, but instead has a strong one-shot.
The FV 4005 is flexible and takes a long time to inflict heavy damage.
If you use shell reload boost on FV4005, it's not even that long, imo
In WoT, the FV4005 is a beast, dealing almost 1750 - 1900 in a single shot, making the Maus cower in fear
Man in real life fv 4005 has 28s of reloading I don't know where that autoloader comes from?
It was designed by some very skilled people with no idea of historical accuracy sitting in Wargaming HQ. They designed a 122 mm autoloader instead of a 183 mm derpgun
The fv4005 has the 183 instead of the 122mm and the fv4005 was not use cause it has alot of recoils and if it fire it can dmg something in the tank but idk and Fv4005 Was first design with no boxy turret and has an autoloader It was called fv4005 Stage 1 And change In the 1945 or 1980 I forgot but it was change to fv4005 stage 2 with the 183mm gun
In real life there was no Fv215b 183 ... WG create it for us 😉
@@manuelmayr8831 ik it was Wargaming planning to make the fv215b 183 for fun cause it has armor but Has lower aim than the fv4005 stage 2 fun fact I'm talking about Wot pc
@@manuelmayr8831 there must be some blueprints
Fun fact: FV4005 + shell reload boost = WTF auf E100
Ausf
"WTF" lol
Hd it’s been a long time i commented on your video
And i am glad this channel is still going at full ammo and health
*You know what i mean*
Goodluck and don’t let jageroo ammorack you
Yes, hope I don't get ammoracked from UA-cam
Lol imagine youtube algorithm just suddenly hates you
@@reynardadrian9345 I hope that will never happen
In a 1V1 at close combat the Death Star will usually win, but at long range the FV4005 has a high chance of winning if he spots the Death Star first.
But this 1V1 is not realistic because it does not include outside factors like teammates. So such a scenario is unlikely to happen in a real match. In a real match, the FV4005 performs better, not just against the Death Star, but in general.
True yeah
1:05 did my man really say gg 💀
FV4005 is way more flexible than the 215b.
I believe the 4005 is more strong whole in groups, but weaker in a 1v1 situation
2:46 I can feel that camera shake
It was at this moment I knew... I F up
The FV 4005 has a higher chance of winning
Not really. Every shot is an RNG fest to hit and pen, and not go ghost shell, and having 4 requires a long poke time. High Alpha on one shot makes for less RNG and better poking.
However ther Jag is better than the DS and the Badger is better than the SB so there is no reason to run either.
@@Umbreona if that deathstar missed his shot, hes dead
@@Umbreona it mostly need 2 clips anyway and with that quick clip relaod consumable, it can dump out its shells quickly and the 183 is going to suffer most of the times
Fv4005 would win, the aim and she’ll dispersion on the hammer is stupid. From experience fv4005 is much better.
@@Umbreona Most cases 4005 will get 3/4 shots most of the time assume one of their shot is a miss fire. That still 1230 ave alpha damage she delivered. Plus 4005 Users (if they're smart enough) will use Spall Liner so it alrd a Get out of Jail free Card for her.
FV4005 in wotb: bonked mickey
fv4005 in wot pc: stronk mickey
4005 have high dpm but there is 1 thing i don't like, it easy to get shoot, 4005 It's like a target to practice shooting at close range
T-43 vs P 43 Ter next ?
This, shall be very, very interesting.
They plan to add Stage II, but they just use...this...stage I Fv
Next Type 71 vs T11OE5 please
Type 71 so easy
@@mysteriousx5713 but more mobile and armored and accurate
So Type 71 vs T11OE5 will be a worthy match
@@vedantprajapati8698 Type 71 more armored
Please bro Type-71 vs WZ-113
how did you can make it 1v1 like that? but i want too
Training rooms
If FV4005 no unskill?
Eu asisti um video de fv 183 vs fv 4005 ontem
for every single 4005 player who watch this video
PLS USE YOUR SPALL LINER
i saw countless 4005 just yoloing and dealt no more than their 1 full clip damage, especially by HE/HESH
there's nothing bad coming from spall liner,it can save your toilet-paper turret in a lot of scenarios
True so many people don't use Spall Liner, is it that because newbies think it's not worth it, because they will have to spend credits?
@@ScanerSlo idk,maybe they don't understand the description,and the actual effects
but meh,google translate is exist for a lot of reasons
Next amx 13 90 vs amx Defender PLS i Need this
Do m48 patton vs m60 pls
183 is good for sniping and 4005 for head-on collision (fight)
Both are good in different roles 🤔
Imagine if 4005 have a same gun as he was in wot, it will be instant win to 4005 cause that gun deal 1600-1800 damage in one single shot
In my opinion.
FV4005 should be a second Death Star.
I hate this autoloader!
Soo dumb!
😒
This game is unrealistic anyway!
But i like the tank to be atleast more realisitic than now!
Or more accurate not realsitic!
Make the gun aim bad and also make the gun hit its shots rarely.
Similar to the current 183.
And maybe nerd the speed and take speed booster away.
And make the reload 22 seconds.
😮
Ans make the camo none.
😂
Т - 34 - 3 VS Type 59☝☝☝
who is e100 vs jg e 100 ?
hopefully tomorrow
Badger vs E3 pls
T110E3 vs T110E4 Pls
IDK Why Wargaming Decide to put an Auto-Loader at the FV 4005 despite the fact that FV 4005 is equip with the same 183 mm Gun like the FV 215B and in WOT PC its just a normal one shot same as FV 215B
To make the tank different
in my opinion the 183 is more fun to play than the 4005. tho I don't play the 4005 much cause of how overpowered it is
in 1 v 1 why FV4005 dont used HE ammo if everything allowed?
Do VK 45.02 a vs Tiger 2
Use longer time to aim for effective damage ;)
FV4005 can just us Reticle Calibration consumable.
@@ScanerSlo yes But i had a Trainigsbattle in there work it for Engine booster 🤔
Why isn’t 4005 stage 2 in blitz
HD Android Gaming gow to you nick WOT blirz?
M6A2E1 EXP VS T34
Yes finally
go FV215B vs FV215B 183
2:46 this made me so pissed of
why is FV4005 Called a shitbarn
come on next chu then and tiger 1
I stuck in charioteer 😭
Next T71vs Amx 13 75
Bro your friend is turkish why name is yusuf
Its good, but i think all not higher than 55%
1:16 4005 here playing so bad
If I 1v1 with 183 so I win because 183 reload like 4005 so I use rng to kill 183
Fv215b183 vs JG PZ E100
Wait since when is the Shit Barn an auto Loader
Like whos developing wotb
2:43 *angry*
Nice
I just want to have 183
KV-1S VS THUNDER
Hi
hello
The fv183 is not real and the fv4005 is not an autoloader
Hesh or heat lol
4005 will win most times bc is fast and has something that 183 doesn’t, the camo rating, Im UsernameNotLoaded, i had so much fun, i hope ill get into next ones to
BiG AlPha DmG batter than smol, afkourse fv183 batter than fv 400l
Average russian 40%ter
lool FV4005 gamage 1500