Face to Face: George Steiner talks to Jeremy Isaacs

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 10 вер 2020
  • Face to Face: George Steiner talks to Jeremy Isaacs about his book Real Presences. BBC, first broadcast 31 05 1989

КОМЕНТАРІ • 25

  • @joelbowman23
    @joelbowman23 3 роки тому +9

    19:34 - "My home is a typewriter." Marvelous.

  • @shellyshelly9218
    @shellyshelly9218 7 місяців тому +1

    Superb interview, reminding us of what television used to be.

  • @rotagorretni
    @rotagorretni 8 місяців тому +3

    Came after hearing David Bowie mentioning Steiner in an interview, answering a question about what he (Bowie) and his fellow musicians were trying to musically achieve in the early 70s. Seemed to be referring to what Steiner is here saying about the value of making even a small impression on history by pursuing even the slimmest chance of success. Himself exemplifying Steiner's "ironic modesty" in the process

  • @arthurfrancisd.murphy1643
    @arthurfrancisd.murphy1643 8 місяців тому +1

    Wonderful interview

  • @shaunlanighan813
    @shaunlanighan813 3 роки тому +8

    That single great tragedy of saying goodbye forever happened to me on 21st of April when I left my darling Abigail in hospital thinking I would see her again ...I did, but she was dead

  • @ianmartinezcassmeyer
    @ianmartinezcassmeyer Рік тому +3

    2:35
    Also, it's criminal this interview is only half an hour.

  • @arthurfrancisd.murphy1643
    @arthurfrancisd.murphy1643 2 роки тому +2

    A truly wonderful man

  • @miguelclarkeottovonbismarck
    @miguelclarkeottovonbismarck 3 роки тому +2

    Danke!

  • @lessismore4470
    @lessismore4470 Рік тому

    Great interview.

  • @grenvillephillips6998
    @grenvillephillips6998 6 місяців тому

    I've always found Steiner inspiring!

  • @sibengerard1856
    @sibengerard1856 3 роки тому

    Thanks for this.

  • @freeri87
    @freeri87 3 роки тому +9

    What did George Steiner and Harold Bloom think of each other?

    • @sibengerard1856
      @sibengerard1856 3 роки тому +7

      A question I have always asked-my self.

    • @TerryStewart32
      @TerryStewart32 3 роки тому +4

      You could also add Roger Kimball, Allan Bloom and Mortimer J Adler to the list of those like Harold Bloom who were defiant in their defence of the classical and defining books of western civilization

    • @oliverhanks4900
      @oliverhanks4900 2 роки тому +2

      Roger Scruton, Kenneth Clark, Anthony Esolen, Jeffrey Hart, John Ellis

    • @andrewhopkins3358
      @andrewhopkins3358 2 роки тому +1

      I believe Bloom has quoted Steiner. It's an occasional quote, like how he quotes Kermode.
      They would not have agreed on certain things. Bloom is a romantic and Steiner is a classicist, roughly speaking
      Of course they both though the civilization was falling to shreds and believed in the authority of the writer and the obligation of the critic to think for themselves

  • @stephensharp3033
    @stephensharp3033 3 місяці тому

    Did George always wear the same shirt when on TV?

  • @DucadiBorgogna_
    @DucadiBorgogna_ 2 роки тому +2

    Who is the Sculptor he is talking about? By the way he is a genius

  • @freeri87
    @freeri87 2 роки тому +1

    Can someone inform me: what was George Steiner's favorite books?

  • @mollycellanjones813
    @mollycellanjones813 9 місяців тому +1

    What is the name of the book he is talking about?

  • @user-xo3bt9sh3r
    @user-xo3bt9sh3r Рік тому

    Wonderful. But I don't really get the last part about resisting the temptations of the USA to keep alive the culture from the Renaissance onwards that he belongs to. Yet he spent most of his time in England, with short forays to the USA and a period in Geneva. Yet his jewish culture was that of the Danube, the jews of the east of Europe. The western jews (Geneva) were different and of course the British jews were the only big European community of jews who survived the war complete. So despite his decades in England there was no need to put a stake in the ground, by his presence, to reassert the jewish contribution for all the jews in Britain, bar a few service men, ended the war alive and intact. If he really wanted to contribute to keeping that flame of his cultural inheritance alive then surely he should have moved to Vienna? I can only think otherwise that maybe his point was to indicate to younger European jews that they ought to kindle Judaism on the continent as much as they can, for the reason he gave about a continuation of a great contribution to European intellectualism.