The stoppage of time in this video could also be described as a stoppage of motion through space. That leads to the question: Is time anything other than motion through space, along with the rise in entropy that accompanies such motion?
The past (everything) is dual to the future (nothing) -- time duality. We know everything about the past as we have experienced or measured it and nothing about the future as it has not happened yet. "Physics is what we know and metaphysics is what we do not know" -- Bertrand Russell. Knowledge is dual! Physics (a posteriori or measured) is dual to metaphysics (a priori or not measured) -- synthetic a priori knowledge, Immanuel Kant. Absolute time (Galileo) is dual to relative time (Einstein) -- time duality. Time is a dual concept. Space is dual to time -- Einstein. Everything (a posteriori) is dual to nothing (a priori) synthesizes the present (something). Concepts are dual to percepts -- the mind duality of Immanuel Kant. The concept of the future or nothing is built from your past experiences or knowledge (history). "Always two there are" -- Yoda. Your mind is creating something from nothing -- time duality!
The past (everything) is dual to the future (nothing) -- time duality. We know everything about the past as we have experienced or measured it and nothing about the future as it has not happened yet. "Physics is what we know and metaphysics is what we do not know" -- Bertrand Russell. Knowledge is dual! Physics (a posteriori or measured) is dual to metaphysics (a priori or not measured) -- synthetic a priori knowledge, Immanuel Kant. Absolute time (Galileo) is dual to relative time (Einstein) -- time duality. Time is a dual concept. Space is dual to time -- Einstein. Everything (a posteriori) is dual to nothing (a priori) synthesizes the present (something). Concepts are dual to percepts -- the mind duality of Immanuel Kant. The concept of the future or nothing is built from your past experiences or knowledge (history, memory). "Always two there are" -- Yoda. Your mind is creating something from nothing -- time duality!
In the Flash movie they are just showing what it is like from the speedsters point of view. Time is not slowed down or sped up. Its just a way to see what's going on in real time but just slowed down so its perceivable. Its basically like watching a video at .25 speed on UA-cam, time is not affected.
@@wowplayer160 I understand what Time Dilation is, but I don't think it would be noticeable in this case. The Flash is not going close enough to the sapped of light for the full effect of Time Dilation to be noticeable.
@@randomgrinn oh, absolutely, it is impossible in reality, for innumerable reasons… friction is ignored in flash etc by an “aura” shielding the speedster… or some other magic reason.
The past (everything) is dual to the future (nothing) -- time duality. We know everything about the past as we have experienced or measured it and nothing about the future as it has not happened yet. "Physics is what we know and metaphysics is what we do not know" -- Bertrand Russell. Knowledge is dual! Physics (a posteriori or measured) is dual to metaphysics (a priori or not measured) -- synthetic a priori knowledge, Immanuel Kant. Absolute time (Galileo) is dual to relative time (Einstein) -- time duality. Time is a dual concept. Space is dual to time -- Einstein. Everything (a posteriori) is dual to nothing (a priori) synthesizes the present (something). Concepts are dual to percepts -- the mind duality of Immanuel Kant. The concept of the future or nothing is built from your past experiences or knowledge (history, memory). "Always two there are" -- Yoda. Your mind is creating something from nothing -- time duality!
Just because we observe causality, doesn't mean it actually exists, or needed by nature. It's something we humans need, to perceive reality. Not necessarily what actually is.
A couple of other problems with time stopping everywhere but in your bubble: 1) Because everything outside of the bubble is completely immobile, the air in the bubble would have no way to dump heat. So the waste heat produced by your own body would gradually build up and eventually you would be cooked by your own body's heat. But way before that happened... 2) The solar system is moving at about 200 km/sec through the galaxy. If time instantly stopped, the solar system would stop moving along with everything else. But inside your bubble, your body would still retain the same angular velocity and momentum as before, so you would smash into the solid air outside of your bubble at that 200 km/sec velocity.
Like, all gravity would stop to "happen" since gravity is an effect of ongoing time. Also every other fundamental force would most likely "stop working".
Thanks, you pointed out interesting additional effects. Here is a longer answer to 2) from ChatGPT lol: ======= Yes, if time stopped for the entire universe except for one person in a bubble of air, that person would indeed retain their angular momentum from the Earth's rotation and the motion of the solar system. This would have significant consequences that could be lethal. Here’s why: ### 1. **Angular Momentum from Earth's Rotation**: - The Earth rotates at a speed of approximately 1,670 km/h (around 465 m/s) at the equator. Even though we don't feel this motion under normal circumstances because we move with the Earth, if time stopped for everything except the person, the Earth would suddenly seem to freeze beneath them. - Since the person retains their angular momentum, they would continue moving at this high speed relative to the now "frozen" Earth. Effectively, they would be flung at a tremendous velocity in a tangential direction, likely causing severe trauma or death due to the enormous forces involved. ### 2. **Motion from Earth's Orbital Velocity**: - In addition to the Earth's rotation, the Earth orbits the Sun at about 30 km/s. If time stopped for everything else, the person would retain this orbital velocity as well, moving at tens of kilometers per second through space. The air in their bubble wouldn't be able to keep up with such a rapid movement, causing the person to exit the bubble almost instantly. Without an atmosphere to protect them, they would be exposed to the vacuum of space, leading to suffocation or other fatal effects of decompression. ### 3. **Solar System and Galactic Motion**: - Beyond Earth's rotation and orbit around the Sun, the entire solar system is moving through the galaxy at approximately 230 km/s. If the rest of the universe stopped, the person would still be moving at this speed through space. The effects would be catastrophic, as even the slightest contact with frozen objects (like Earth or particles in space) could result in extreme damage due to the immense velocity. ### Conclusion: Retaining the angular momentum from the Earth's rotation, orbital velocity, and the motion of the solar system would result in the person moving incredibly fast relative to their surroundings. The sudden and violent relative motion would likely be fatal due to both the sheer forces involved and the inability to survive without an atmosphere or stable conditions. =======
When you see speedsters in movies like the Flash, time isn't slowing down for them , they are just moving really fast and we are seeing what they are seeing. The people are still moving at normal speeds. Time isn't slowing down, the speedster is just moving faster than them.
Exactly. Pigeons, like many birds, have a faster temporal resolution for auditory and visual stimuli compared to humans, so they perceive people moving and speaking much slower than we do. To a pigeon, events seem to happen slower than we experience them, but that's because its "internal clock" runs faster than ours, not because time is running at a different rate.
@@nissemus I believe there's a rough correlation between lifespan and heart rate, could that correlation extend to sense of time as well? How does a tortoise sense time at 25 beats per minute during it's 125 year plus life?
Exactly. The reference frame of the speedster is **not** the same as for the bystanders. Therefore their clock moves slower allowing them to do _many more_ things more quickly than the bystanders can perceive. They aren't stopping time. They are slowing their own reference frame, the speedsters, giving the outward affect of being super fast.
So he stopped the time for the bullets themselves. Well, then you'd basically see pure nothingness where the bullets actually are, i guess it would look black, but it could just look like actual pure nothingness wich is something only blind people seem to actually comperhend.
@@loganwolv3393 No, he would still see them, because the Matrix is a computer-simulated environment, so the limitations of normal physics don't apply. Basically, it's like causing your computer screen to freeze up. You can still see the screen.
It would be fun to calculate the effects of something moving so fast near people. I imagine destructive heat burns, pressure shock waves... And sonic booms if fast enough. Not so much fun. 😂
I have thought of that question all my life.I thought that I would never have an answer. And now the answer is here in this video!Thank you for sharing!
Time being an illusion is not about time not being real, but rather that it's not as we experience it, and that there is a reference point from where time does not exist.
The past (everything) is dual to the future (nothing) -- time duality. We know everything about the past as we have experienced or measured it and nothing about the future as it has not happened yet. "Physics is what we know and metaphysics is what we do not know" -- Bertrand Russell. Knowledge is dual! Physics (a posteriori or measured) is dual to metaphysics (a priori or not measured) -- synthetic a priori knowledge, Immanuel Kant. Absolute time (Galileo) is dual to relative time (Einstein) -- time duality. Time is a dual concept. Space is dual to time -- Einstein. Everything (a posteriori) is dual to nothing (a priori) synthesizes the present (something). Concepts are dual to percepts -- the mind duality of Immanuel Kant. The concept of the future or nothing is built from your past experiences or knowledge (history, memory). "Always two there are" -- Yoda. Your mind is creating something from nothing -- time duality!
Yes, I’m being pedantic here, but that’s why comments exist. Technically, your inclusion of scenes from The Matrix was an error. The premise of that movie franchise is that our reality is simulated and, hence, the apparent laws of nature can change instantly for one person, many people, or everyone. It’s just programming. Given such a premise, the movies’ depiction of slowed/stopped time isn’t inconsistent with reality (in those movies).
Back in my 20s I overdosed on a drug. I had to be brought back with Narcan. I guess I was out for 20 minutes. Blue skin, I wasnt breathing, brain was lacking oxygen. I was basically dead. Maybe 1% vital functions. When I got brought back, I literally had no idea time had passed. My brain wasn't recording because it was shut down. For me it was like that 20 minutes didn't even exist.
When I was having surgery, I was 100% resolute on counting down from 10 and actually reaching zero. And I succeeded! Booyah! (Well, except for the part where I'd had surgery somewhere between 5... and 4... 😂) Doc was like: "Nope... look around you, man. You're in recovery."
People that have major epileptic attacks, experience a loss of memory off about 10-15 minuts up to the attack, and can really remember the first few minutes after. Thats because they lose their short term memory, which is stored in neuroloops, and they have yet to be made permanent neuron loops. And when they wake up, the entire brain has to get all the systems working, it has to fill up the short term memory, make itself aware of where you are what's happening and so on, that takes (UPPS there the word again) TIME !!
Not to mention that stopping time would reduce the local temperature suddenly to absolute zero. You'd be very cold. But if you could somehow do it, the other problem is that any motion you made would create sonic booms for everybody around you once you started time again. You'd push all air molecules out of the way, like walking through deep snow. When you started time again, they'd suddenly snap back into place. BOOM! Ouch. My ears. The same thing would happen to light, as you pushed all the photons away. When you started time again, there would be an incredibly brief blackness for somebody standing behind the path you took. When time resumed the light would nearly instantly fill that blackness once again, so it wouldn't be notice. But the sonic boom would probably knock everyone on their asses.
Heat does not exist, but rather is our interpretation of molecular velocity, or meters per second. If the divisor were zero due to no time change, it would be meaningless since division by zero is meaningless. Which means it is impossible to stop time. So, the whole video is interesting but actually not a reflection of reality.
I guess the absolute zero thing may be the case if the molecules you interacted with gained time/movement once they came in contact with you, due to your movement into them. But assuming no movement at all, you wouldn't be able to move at all through it, as the air wouldn't "give". Also, it probably wouldn't feel cold since I believe your heat needs to leave you in order for you to feel cold. With no time outside of you, no heat would escape from you. Basically, if you can't move anything around you, then you are actually as stationary as everything else...like having a block of ice flash-frozen around you...but again, without the cold (as the ice molecules would take heat from your body and warm up, with some areas touching your skin possibly even melting due to it, while particles that didn't experience time would not melt). On the topic of phase changes, if things did more as you approached them, and you had the strength to get through the air, if there were pressure waves as you mentioned, then it could be that you could push air and make it into a liquid or even solid with enough of that pressure in one place, where the molecules get bunched up. Interesting to think about.
@@rainofrest7778 According to Relativity Light does not stop time. It has no concept of time dilation. Time always progresses at the maximum rate for a photon :)
A few other issues with stopping time for everyone other than you: thermal convection and radiation stop working - so you could not gain any heat from the environment, but you also couldn't shed any heat, so it's plausible that you could overheat, since your metabolic processes would keep running and generating heat you could not lose. It's entirely questionable as to whether or not you'd experience air pressure, since the gas molecules around you, having come to a complete standstill, would exert no pressure on you or the air molecules closest to your skin. Also, since gravity is a function of time, it's entirely plausible that you'd feel no gravitational effects, since the mass of your body would be causally disconnected from interacting with the gravitational effects of any other mass.
Heat is non existent, but is our interpretation of molecular meters per second. If there were no time and no per second divisor, this would be division by zero which is meaningless. Which shows time cannot stop and the video is merely an impossible speculation.
Thanks Arvin. You described this quite accurately according to accepted physics (accept for the time being real part). > For me this has so many ambiguities and contradictions that I don't know where to start lol (That is not a criticism of you, just weakness in conceptual aspects of the theory as I see it) I am not an indentured physicist. Just working from a lifetime of personal education across multiple science disciplines. > Let's first consider the concept of time never stopping or being a fundamental and unstoppable progression. This invokes a somewhat differently constructed universe to a universe with the version of time that is non real or just an abstract measurement. We can envision many examples of a cold universe with no movement and no time, or concepts of no progression of time before the big bang for example. Look forward to you next video :) > Local and global reference frames. At what point do we draw the line between one reference frame and another? In your descriptions here we have a very complicated mix of independent reference frames declare as a single reference frame. At what point do we declare that a local reference frame is global? In most examples (especially relating to time dilation in flat space (SR)) local and global reference frames tend to get blurred together, as well as the description of the real object and a distant view of the object. This shows up in the SR time dilation due to velocity paradoxes. I don't believe time dilation due to gravity (accelleration) and time dilation due to velocity are the same thing or even directly related. SR time dilation due to velocity is just an optical illusion of the viewer (but useful to calculate what that distant object is doing by accounting for the visual illusion.) I don't believe time dilation due to velocity only has ever been experimentally tested in flat space (Outside of the influence of gravity due to mass or acceleration due to angular velocity.) > The list continues, but these issues tend to present at the boundaries in a similar way to your boundary bubble for the hypothetical stopped time. That event horizon of the bubble seams to contain a small error that is the difference between a rational number and an irrational number. It is an "off by 0.000...1", It is the difference between a version of relativity that can describe the boundaries such as event horizons, and one that gets trapped into commonly found infinities and weird paradoxes. > Space-time and 'c' Work well for current application but are somewhat ambiguous at the extremes.
The past (everything) is dual to the future (nothing) -- time duality. We know everything about the past as we have experienced or measured it and nothing about the future as it has not happened yet. "Physics is what we know and metaphysics is what we do not know" -- Bertrand Russell. Knowledge is dual! Physics (a posteriori or measured) is dual to metaphysics (a priori or not measured) -- synthetic a priori knowledge, Immanuel Kant. Absolute time (Galileo) is dual to relative time (Einstein) -- time duality. Time is a dual concept. Space is dual to time -- Einstein. Everything (a posteriori) is dual to nothing (a priori) synthesizes the present (something). Concepts are dual to percepts -- the mind duality of Immanuel Kant. The concept of the future or nothing is built from your past experiences or knowledge (history, memory). "Always two there are" -- Yoda. Your mind is creating something from nothing -- time duality!
@Arvin, a fun exercise with time is imagining that you capture a short scene in a kind of video camera that records space in 3D and time as a 4th dimension. You can keep all this data in a 4d array and then reshape it to have the time dimension in place of a spatial dimension. Then you "play" the scene aling the spatial dimension as if it was time. The scene would be bizarre. Nothing would make much sense. You would see a 2D slice of everything that happened at that current plane during all the time at once. I have not actually tried it but seems doable with an animation software. And of course I know time dimension is of a different nature than the spatial dimensions and you can exchange them, but not sure why.
The moment "time" stops (literally meaning the phenomenal evolution of correlation of different bundles of space as matter stops) no"thing" remains (of course including "bodies") so there is nothing to terrify anybody. It is at the behest or ""pressure"" of time that space evolves giving time its apparent existence.
If time stopped for everything except you, how could you move through the air? All the molecules would be frozen in place. How could you breath if air couldn't move? How could sunlight be bright or warm if photons weren't moving? How could matter even exist if electrons weren't orbiting their nuclei?
The past (everything) is dual to the future (nothing) -- time duality. We know everything about the past as we have experienced or measured it and nothing about the future as it has not happened yet. "Physics is what we know and metaphysics is what we do not know" -- Bertrand Russell. Knowledge is dual! Physics (a posteriori or measured) is dual to metaphysics (a priori or not measured) -- synthetic a priori knowledge, Immanuel Kant. Absolute time (Galileo) is dual to relative time (Einstein) -- time duality. Time is a dual concept. Space is dual to time -- Einstein. Everything (a posteriori) is dual to nothing (a priori) synthesizes the present (something). Concepts are dual to percepts -- the mind duality of Immanuel Kant. The concept of the future or nothing is built from your past experiences or knowledge (history, memory). "Always two there are" -- Yoda. Your mind is creating something from nothing -- time duality!
You would have to have a complete universe inside your bubble for this to work. Our bodies perceive air pressure, time, heat, cold, sound, taste, touch etc. If the universe outside ourselves stopped all our interactions with it that feed into the senses would stop as well unless recreated within the bubble. Essentially you can't stop time without completely recreating time since time and the subject experiencing it aren't separate from each other. It's one movement.
If you allow the physics to act on that bubble (event horizon) and allow it to expand at the speed of light like any other event horizon, then you have just created the fundamental concept of an infinite universe :)
‘The cushion’ is generally the electron cloud. The person in the centre is the nucleus. Just the matter of having an electron that never loses momentum around the nucleus gives us the universe we see.(and bump our toes against). Have fun living in your wobbly gelatinous, wavy universe.
Wonderful explanation. In the book "Momo" by Michael.Ende, the hero of the story, a little girl, gets a gift of one hour of time to save the world, while it's standing still, before the evil "time saving bank" destroys it all.❤Ufortunately we have to do it inside the time.
I can't tell you how much it tickled me watching this, I've thought of this so many times and it's like you're in my head. My first thought was "oh shit you'd just be frozen where you are like a statue, the air around you and currently in your lungs may as well be a perfectly form fitting iron glove, and you'd suffocate. So okay, a bubble around you where time moves normally, well crap it would be pitch black. And also walking near people might mess them up. And a bunch of permutations where you try to exclude other biological material from the bubble and get stabbed by frozen grass or something. Then you hit a bunch of those points and I had such a booyah moment lol.
Wasn't there an old Twilight Zone where a guy walks into a shop and tosses a quarter onto the counter to buy a newspaper and the coin lands on its edge? At that moment, everything around him freezes--until the quarter tips over. One of the best episodes ever.
Actually, in that episode he could hear what other people were thinking until the coin tips over ("A Penny for Your Thoughts"). There was a different episode where a guy gets a stopwatch that freezes time ("A Kind of Stopwatch"). In another episode a gal finds a pendent that stops time ("A Little Peace and Quiet'). [I'm old, so watched all of these in their original TV runs.]
Time as most humans think about it is relative, and the way this could work is not that the universe slowed down, but that you sped up. Think high speed cameras making everything appear really slow by running really fast.
That fails to explain causation and the seeming passage of time in the regime where space is flat (zero gravity) and speed is low. That's the regime where we age fastest... speed and/or gravity reduce the rate of change.
Time is a measure of change, but what causes change. Energy? What is energy? "The capacity to do work"? What has the capacity to do work? The answer is an operative definition of time, and not a descriptive one.
The past (everything) is dual to the future (nothing) -- time duality. We know everything about the past as we have experienced or measured it and nothing about the future as it has not happened yet. "Physics is what we know and metaphysics is what we do not know" -- Bertrand Russell. Knowledge is dual! Physics (a posteriori or measured) is dual to metaphysics (a priori or not measured) -- synthetic a priori knowledge, Immanuel Kant. Absolute time (Galileo) is dual to relative time (Einstein) -- time duality. Time is a dual concept. Space is dual to time -- Einstein. Everything (a posteriori) is dual to nothing (a priori) synthesizes the present (something). Concepts are dual to percepts -- the mind duality of Immanuel Kant. The concept of the future or nothing is built from your past experiences or knowledge (history, memory). "Always two there are" -- Yoda. Your mind is creating something from nothing -- time duality!
@@alexgonzo5508 Good question. No one knows for sure why the universe is expanding. My guess is there has to be energy of some sort being put into the universe in order to cause the expansion. But what is the source of this energy? Hmmm....
Excellent explanation! Almost perfect. It's just that the depiction right after 4:08 would be just like the next example of not having a cushion around your body, so instead of passing out and falling down, you'd be held in place by the static air molecules right around you, and just like with the cushion example, you wouldn't see anything, either. But yeah, this was still a very nice video!
Actually, there is the possibility of time stopping in one place relative to another one: Time at an event horizon stops relative to any observer away from it.
The past (everything) is dual to the future (nothing) -- time duality. We know everything about the past as we have experienced or measured it and nothing about the future as it has not happened yet. "Physics is what we know and metaphysics is what we do not know" -- Bertrand Russell. Knowledge is dual! Physics (a posteriori or measured) is dual to metaphysics (a priori or not measured) -- synthetic a priori knowledge, Immanuel Kant. Absolute time (Galileo) is dual to relative time (Einstein) -- time duality. Time is a dual concept. Space is dual to time -- Einstein. Everything (a posteriori) is dual to nothing (a priori) synthesizes the present (something). Concepts are dual to percepts -- the mind duality of Immanuel Kant. The concept of the future or nothing is built from your past experiences or knowledge (history, memory). "Always two there are" -- Yoda. Your mind is creating something from nothing -- time duality!
"Reverse Entropy" and "Reunite Gondwanaland" are my fave bumped stickered sentences. Parents national scientists and more, moi languages/literatures, originally. Very measured voice, manner, info. Bravo.
The past (everything) is dual to the future (nothing) -- time duality. We know everything about the past as we have experienced or measured it and nothing about the future as it has not happened yet. "Physics is what we know and metaphysics is what we do not know" -- Bertrand Russell. Knowledge is dual! Physics (a posteriori or measured) is dual to metaphysics (a priori or not measured) -- synthetic a priori knowledge, Immanuel Kant. Absolute time (Galileo) is dual to relative time (Einstein) -- time duality. Time is a dual concept. Space is dual to time -- Einstein. Everything (a posteriori) is dual to nothing (a priori) synthesizes the present (something). Concepts are dual to percepts -- the mind duality of Immanuel Kant. The concept of the future or nothing is built from your past experiences or knowledge (history, memory). "Always two there are" -- Yoda. Your mind is creating something from nothing -- time duality!
Now I want to see you make a video talking about what it would be like if: Literally everything outside of your air bubble was moving at 99.999999% c in tiny little circles. That would create a scenario somewhat like the ones we see in movies. Though everything would still be pitch black, no laws of physics would be broken save for the non-law-breaking question of where is all that energy coming from.
What you are describing is not time stopping, but all motion stopping. If all motion stopped, time would still continue. Time does not need motion, or a device to calculate it, in order for it to exist. The only way that time could possibly stop is if there were no universe for time to exist in. Basically, absolute nothingness.
If you had a bubble of air around you where time still moved, you’d still suffocate pretty quickly Unless the bubble acts as a solid barrier, the air molecules would stop once they reach the edge of the bubble, creating a high pressure film of air on the bubble’s surface, but since the air outside the bubble is stopped, no new air comes in, and you are quickly exposed to vacuum
In Michaël Ende's 'Momo' there is a scene where the Lord of time, Master Hora, goes to sleep in order to get rid of the grey men who live on stolen time in form of hour flowers they dry and smoke in cigarettes. Momo, the heroine of the story, gets an hour flower in order to pursue the grey men and free all the stolen time they've stored. In this vision, the world looks like a 3D standing image where even soft stuff is completely hard. As far as I remember, one of the grey men even hits his head at a flying feather. Notably, the air isn't hard; everyone can move through it, just as if it weren't there.
actually everything in the universe is always travelling at maximum speed through 4 dimension space time. If you’re sitting still then your clocks are ticking at the fastest possible speed. When you start to move through space, you need to convert some of the speed in the time dimension into speed in the space dimension. This is why time slows down more the faster you move. In other words, the only way for your clock to stop is if you travelled at the speed of light.
What’s curious here is that every human as a child has a dream of stopping time to become able to manipulate the world to your favor by turning it back on when your are ready so, why’s that? How do we so readily imagine this?
My guess is that It's a great fantasy because we always want to either redo our past mistakes or be able to slow down the seemingly swift movement of time, and the changes that come with it.
It is purely a biological (physiological) excretion/illusion from the way evolution created us. I used to, in a naive way, as a child pull apart mechanical clocks to find time and how time worked... maybe manipulate it a little.
By this notion then, if a device was able to slow down the flow of time, a second inertial reference frame would be created. Although physics 'doesn't allow this' more to the point we cannot currently do it - but it happens naturally whenever there is motion. Therefore if we forced this and a slow of time was achieved then our device would move, we would have caused it to gain velocity. However this would not be Newtonian motion as we are used to, the effect of motion would extend as a field around the device.
I haven’t seen the flash, so I’m assuming a little about what is portrayed, but if your brain was made faster, so you perceive things more often, you would see things in slow motion, as you are perceiving 1 second more times than you would normally. This combined with incredible speed would allow you to “slow time” as you perceive each second more times, but move faster to make up for the difference.
The past (everything) is dual to the future (nothing) -- time duality. We know everything about the past as we have experienced or measured it and nothing about the future as it has not happened yet. "Physics is what we know and metaphysics is what we do not know" -- Bertrand Russell. Knowledge is dual! Physics (a posteriori or measured) is dual to metaphysics (a priori or not measured) -- synthetic a priori knowledge, Immanuel Kant. Absolute time (Galileo) is dual to relative time (Einstein) -- time duality. Time is a dual concept. Space is dual to time -- Einstein. Everything (a posteriori) is dual to nothing (a priori) synthesizes the present (something). Concepts are dual to percepts -- the mind duality of Immanuel Kant. The concept of the future or nothing is built from your past experiences or knowledge (history, memory). "Always two there are" -- Yoda. Your mind is creating something from nothing -- time duality!
Arthur, good 👍🏼 work once again, but you overlooked the 4D Space-time Continuum. If Time were to stop just in yiur local reference frame, the rest of the planet would keep moving. By the time you restarted time in your Frame, you'd be left behind in the vscuum of space, by tens of thousands of km or more. You'd die. The same applies to "going back in time", because the earth, sun and galaxy have moved. 🤯
If I didn't make a mistake in flash movie, time was not frozen for others but rather the speed of the moving of the flash was increased ! Like we have our speed of moving but the speed of light around us is high!
Hi Arvin, excellent video once again. I agree with just about everything. One thing I view differently is the nature of time. Yes, time is real but it is abstract. Just as thoughts, memeories, emotions, numbers, math, letters, words, and lamguage are real yet abstract.Therefore, time, being abstract, does not actually move, nor have a direction, nor stop since it doesn't move in the first place. But, they and, time are psychologically real but not physically real. Time is not made of anything, because it is abstract. Time emerges from consciousness, which itself is emergent. They both emerge from the same processes. Heart beats sending neural impulses to the brain as brain rhythms. Hence, we have the concept, perception, and sense, of time. We have time intrinsically part of our psyche we can't get away from it. We use time to ultimately measure motion. That which moves is energy and motion, not time as the measurement of motion. Often the motion of energy and matter being measured by time is thiught ro be time itself in motion. Time helps us and other conscious entities make sense of motion, sequences, cause and effect as is measured by our brains. Hand and eye coordination, catching a ball, picking up a fork requires timing. But our intrinsic sense of time is less accurate or long periods, distances, and faster motion. So we resort to rhe motion of, in, and about devices, apparatuses, and celestial bodies to more accurate determine the elapse of time. Everywhere we measure there is motion and we attribute a time to all motion. 😊
Interesting perspective. I would argue that time is not abstract, that it is real. It exists and has a one-way direction. It is in our physics equations. It is as real, imo, as energy and force.
@@ArvinAsh Thanks for replying. Yes time is real, just not physically real. Some abstract things are real, such as time, just like math. But neither has any tangible, visible, nor auditory aspects or components. But, I do agree that time is real.
@@bnjm8868 There is a long time ambiguity about this that exist in physics. It's a convention because no one can actually work it out with proof. Central problem to all current physics issues including Quantum gravity. In my opinion.
@@axle.student Yeah, I know. It really is a "you can't see the forest because of the trees" situation or "Naïve realism" is the belief that we see the world precisely as it is, without acknowledging the influence of personal biases, experiences, or emotions on our perceptions. Reification involves treating an abstract concept or subjective experience as if it were a concrete, objective reality. Time is from the observer, not from that which is in motion outside the observer.
@@bnjm8868 It's a difficult one, but if no biology existed, would the universe natural still have some expression of movement one moment to the next. I expect so, but is it just an emergent property out of movement, or something more fundamental and persistent. Modern physics takes a perspective that time is just progression/motion in the universe and our need to measure a period of past photons (information). The other is where time is more fundamental like a driving force which seams to be rejected by most modern physics. Weird part is relativity kind of (seams to) blur both concepts of time to some extent. It was like they couldn't really pick one so they mashed both in lol It's not an issue until we get to edge cases at event horizons and then it gets weird, like being able to time travel etc. :) Space-time is weirder than fiction sometimes :)
I've already thought of this. What if someone tortures you, and then rewinds time, and then tortures you again, etc. Over and over again for a year, and then he lets time run normally and stops torturing you. At first, that was scary to think about. But then I realized that you'd remember nothing about it, and so it doesn't matter. Though I don't think time is real, so this couldn't happen anyways.
What about at a white-hole's event horizon? Due to the extreme spacetime curvature, the closer you approach a white-hole, the slower and more red-shifted the universe appears to you until it eventually stops? I know it's not the same thing as what you're talking about because you don't experience the flow of time in more than one way per reference frame, but it's the closest thing I can think of.
Infinity close to stopped but never stopped. The red shift will stretch until the wave is so long that we cannot detect it, but it is still there and traveling at 'c' :)
The subjective experience of the passage of time from an observer is an illusion created by that observer's naturally selected brain, also the idea that space and time are separate is an illusion. In fact, the idea that anything is separate from everything is also an illusion. 😎🤖
The change in Time is actually a change in Entropy. If Entropy was zero, Time would appear to stand still. The reason Time appear to move in one direction is because Entropy typically increases, and it is a "State function" in thermodynamics, and does not inherently depend on "Time".
QUESTION?: I saw someone saying that (was it here?) acceleration is the cause for one's clock slowing. If that's true, then once one achieves a high velocity, for argument's sake - 90%c, one's relative clock should return to that of all other bodies moving at that speed. So, all of the (relative) slowed clock time would be entirely contained within the acceleration time of the journey. *_YES???_* Maybe it was Hossenfelder's channel... 🤔
I always liked the movies "Clockstoppers" and "The Langoliers" where time slows down almost stopping. It sure would be a good ability to have (assuming I could start time back up to 'normal'.
Stephen hawking said the big bang center is in the tip of the nose of everyone of us. This emphasize all of us are INNER to universe spacetime 4D. Being inner, the size of that singularity can only be quantified by one observer at dimension above the 4D, not by us. Also today we are inner the same 4D and we are and see movement everywhere. The fundamental physics law here, inner 4D is the Movement and the causation implication, have a limit of "c". Speed is movment, and c limit rules its components, "s" and "t". This video exposes very well that. At yhe same reference frame all respect the 4D laws, but the cinema put the hero as someone 5D, with all paradox created by not respecting 4D universe laws. Science asylum have one video showing in a full 4D chart, nothing moves, but this can only be perceived by a observer dimension above. Like this, the Dimensions must be well explained at physics, else we enter the regression to infinity of put dimensions above to explain the below. Like space time channel explained , inverse square law of propagation rulling in our 3D space universe, implies a 1/r^3 law in a 4D space universe, and that cannot physically exist.
Not even the Gods can overcome time - Thor once fought an old lady, and to his surprise he started to lose, he did not know that they had pitched him against time ! What is interesting, is that it only runs in one direction, just like the total entropy always increases - and that has probably something to do with time. Otherwise we could reverse the entropy ! Now wouldn't that be lovely in my messy cellar !
I have another view of that: if I really could move in this set environment, as when time also means space, I might be just stuck, but aware. And I couldn't really see myself but older versions of the universe depending on the distance I move (if I could) where local em-peaks to perceive travelled by the speed of light just in the actual holographic event horizon when time stopped. I could even see the back of my own head propably. It's still relative, isn't it? Time is nothing but a concept. We just measure periods, that's it: our idea of time. Anybody else love swing? :)
Also, just like there's nothing to rule out that time has just randomly stopped for a thousand years 10 seconds ago, there's also nothing ruling out that time has reversed for those thousand years. Ergo, there's no reason to believe there's an arrow of time at all, or that it only runs in one direction when the math solutions work both ways. To put it another way: Without an external reference frame we cannot be guaranteed that time isn't running backwards _right now_ 😮
if time stop, photons would not move. in order to get an idea of what was around you, you'd have to do a strange set of movements attempting to collect relevant photons.
Місяць тому
Time flows faster at higher elevations, and slower at lower. But beneath sea level, I think time speeds up again? At the center of the Earth, there is no local gravity, and time is the same as in outer space. So time in Death Value actually flows at the same speed as slightly above sea level.
IMO holding your breath to pause time is a great weaknesses for speedsters, now their speed only last for as long as they can hold their breath, without a limitation they are gods.
In a 60s Startrek episode Captain Kirk was somehow transported to a dimension that was existing at close to the speed of light. On board the Enterprise, the entire crew, from Kirk’s point of view, was stationary. And the crew could not see Captain Kirk because he was moving so fast.
Ditto for Outer Limits episode, where guy has to stop a truck from running over a kid by fetching a seat belt from his own car to tie in the truck about to cause the accident.
С детства задавался этим вопросом. Что если время идет не плавно, а рывками. Порой останавливаясь или даже хуже - преимущественно находится в остановленном состоянии... Мы как существа находящиеся внутри этой метрики, никогда не заметим этого. Течение времени всегда будет плавным и непрерывным...
If you were still able to move while time was stopped for everything else and you contacted anything, the impact would be near infinite in speed. Anything you touched would explode in a fusion explosion as would your finger.
I wish you were here having coffee with me so I could ask questions. I got myself in a TimeLoop and I don't know why. I believe your daughter does Readings?? What Time is she in? Long story short, there was a situation in 1980 and later the movie "Sphere" has all the details of that time, (minus the violence). At the same time things were so crazy that I started doing collages of my Visions....and now those things are coming to pass.
I guess a counter argument would be that someone like Quicksilver is just moving very fast and doesnt manipulate time, but that just takes one impossible feat of physics manipulation and turns in to several impossible feats, like how does he ignore friction to the point of being able to slip through air rendered compressed enough at these speeds to sear your skin off? Oh, presumably except for the soles of his shoes at which point friction has to go off the charts to stop them just slipping right over the ground? How does he take everything in thats happening at multiple times the speed of sound in a small room? (Your brain is actually much slower than any bog standard CPU, but makes up for it in staggering levels of parallelism, but thats not useful if getting across the room happens before a signal can travel between one part of the brain and another...) Im sure others can come up with more reasons physics doesnt work all that well regardless. Ive sometimes wondered what a more realistic speedster could be like. I think it could be interesting. Maybe their brain would be mutated in such a way that processing certain actions can happen twice as fast as a normal human. Maybe it could have detrimental side effects outside of those certain actions. Perhaps they have to train excessively to have a body capable of keeping up with their mind, training reflexes etc. Or perhaps they even have to injure themselves pushing their muscles too far to accomplish their heroic feats.
I have this common movie script I wrote as a teenager when something like this happens, and _over time_ everyone looks like my kids. Idk how that happened, but I can guess. Quite a common story I've been told. 🤔
Thanks to Opera for sponsoring this video. Click: opr.as/09-Opera-browser-arvinash to upgrade your browser for FREE!
The stoppage of time in this video could also be described as a stoppage of motion through space. That leads to the question: Is time anything other than motion through space, along with the rise in entropy that accompanies such motion?
Is it possible quantum entanglement is when time stops for those particles to entangle or to react to the other spin?
The most insecure browser available. No joke. But, if you use TikTok on your phone or computer then it really doesn't matter.
curiosity is a bad bad thing.
The past (everything) is dual to the future (nothing) -- time duality.
We know everything about the past as we have experienced or measured it and nothing about the future as it has not happened yet.
"Physics is what we know and metaphysics is what we do not know" -- Bertrand Russell.
Knowledge is dual!
Physics (a posteriori or measured) is dual to metaphysics (a priori or not measured) -- synthetic a priori knowledge, Immanuel Kant.
Absolute time (Galileo) is dual to relative time (Einstein) -- time duality.
Time is a dual concept.
Space is dual to time -- Einstein.
Everything (a posteriori) is dual to nothing (a priori) synthesizes the present (something).
Concepts are dual to percepts -- the mind duality of Immanuel Kant.
The concept of the future or nothing is built from your past experiences or knowledge (history).
"Always two there are" -- Yoda.
Your mind is creating something from nothing -- time duality!
If time stopped, I'd probably still be late to everything.
Of course, only if you're already late before time stops everywhere. (I think...)
Stop doing that!
Lol
The past (everything) is dual to the future (nothing) -- time duality.
We know everything about the past as we have experienced or measured it and nothing about the future as it has not happened yet.
"Physics is what we know and metaphysics is what we do not know" -- Bertrand Russell.
Knowledge is dual!
Physics (a posteriori or measured) is dual to metaphysics (a priori or not measured) -- synthetic a priori knowledge, Immanuel Kant.
Absolute time (Galileo) is dual to relative time (Einstein) -- time duality.
Time is a dual concept.
Space is dual to time -- Einstein.
Everything (a posteriori) is dual to nothing (a priori) synthesizes the present (something).
Concepts are dual to percepts -- the mind duality of Immanuel Kant.
The concept of the future or nothing is built from your past experiences or knowledge (history, memory).
"Always two there are" -- Yoda.
Your mind is creating something from nothing -- time duality!
Funny way of saying you're just a lazy fuck!:)
In the Flash movie they are just showing what it is like from the speedsters point of view. Time is not slowed down or sped up. Its just a way to see what's going on in real time but just slowed down so its perceivable. Its basically like watching a video at .25 speed on UA-cam, time is not affected.
Pretty sure time dilation has some effect but maybe it's not fully understood by the common viewer. The faster you go, the slower time flows.
@@wowplayer160 I understand what Time Dilation is, but I don't think it would be noticeable in this case. The Flash is not going close enough to the sapped of light for the full effect of Time Dilation to be noticeable.
In the flash, time APPEARS to slow down, because flash is moving so fast, and his perception of the surroundings is translated to us as time stopping.
Yeah, but air friction. The reason things falling into the atmosphere burn up.
This is more obvious in the Quicksilver scenes, where you can see things continuing to move slowly in the background.
@@randomgrinn oh, absolutely, it is impossible in reality, for innumerable reasons… friction is ignored in flash etc by an “aura” shielding the speedster… or some other magic reason.
I thought he wears a friction resistant material, as seen by Batman in JL17.
The past (everything) is dual to the future (nothing) -- time duality.
We know everything about the past as we have experienced or measured it and nothing about the future as it has not happened yet.
"Physics is what we know and metaphysics is what we do not know" -- Bertrand Russell.
Knowledge is dual!
Physics (a posteriori or measured) is dual to metaphysics (a priori or not measured) -- synthetic a priori knowledge, Immanuel Kant.
Absolute time (Galileo) is dual to relative time (Einstein) -- time duality.
Time is a dual concept.
Space is dual to time -- Einstein.
Everything (a posteriori) is dual to nothing (a priori) synthesizes the present (something).
Concepts are dual to percepts -- the mind duality of Immanuel Kant.
The concept of the future or nothing is built from your past experiences or knowledge (history, memory).
"Always two there are" -- Yoda.
Your mind is creating something from nothing -- time duality!
Just because we observe causality, doesn't mean it actually exists, or needed by nature.
It's something we humans need, to perceive reality.
Not necessarily what actually is.
You are trying too hard.
@@robertmontague5650 You are not real.
A couple of other problems with time stopping everywhere but in your bubble:
1) Because everything outside of the bubble is completely immobile, the air in the bubble would have no way to dump heat. So the waste heat produced by your own body would gradually build up and eventually you would be cooked by your own body's heat. But way before that happened...
2) The solar system is moving at about 200 km/sec through the galaxy. If time instantly stopped, the solar system would stop moving along with everything else. But inside your bubble, your body would still retain the same angular velocity and momentum as before, so you would smash into the solid air outside of your bubble at that 200 km/sec velocity.
true
... and a shidd ton of other crazy effects
Like, all gravity would stop to "happen" since gravity is an effect of ongoing time. Also every other fundamental force would most likely "stop working".
Thanks, you pointed out interesting additional effects. Here is a longer answer to 2) from ChatGPT lol:
=======
Yes, if time stopped for the entire universe except for one person in a bubble of air, that person would indeed retain their angular momentum from the Earth's rotation and the motion of the solar system. This would have significant consequences that could be lethal.
Here’s why:
### 1. **Angular Momentum from Earth's Rotation**:
- The Earth rotates at a speed of approximately 1,670 km/h (around 465 m/s) at the equator. Even though we don't feel this motion under normal circumstances because we move with the Earth, if time stopped for everything except the person, the Earth would suddenly seem to freeze beneath them.
- Since the person retains their angular momentum, they would continue moving at this high speed relative to the now "frozen" Earth. Effectively, they would be flung at a tremendous velocity in a tangential direction, likely causing severe trauma or death due to the enormous forces involved.
### 2. **Motion from Earth's Orbital Velocity**:
- In addition to the Earth's rotation, the Earth orbits the Sun at about 30 km/s. If time stopped for everything else, the person would retain this orbital velocity as well, moving at tens of kilometers per second through space. The air in their bubble wouldn't be able to keep up with such a rapid movement, causing the person to exit the bubble almost instantly. Without an atmosphere to protect them, they would be exposed to the vacuum of space, leading to suffocation or other fatal effects of decompression.
### 3. **Solar System and Galactic Motion**:
- Beyond Earth's rotation and orbit around the Sun, the entire solar system is moving through the galaxy at approximately 230 km/s. If the rest of the universe stopped, the person would still be moving at this speed through space. The effects would be catastrophic, as even the slightest contact with frozen objects (like Earth or particles in space) could result in extreme damage due to the immense velocity.
### Conclusion:
Retaining the angular momentum from the Earth's rotation, orbital velocity, and the motion of the solar system would result in the person moving incredibly fast relative to their surroundings. The sudden and violent relative motion would likely be fatal due to both the sheer forces involved and the inability to survive without an atmosphere or stable conditions.
=======
Except Everything you saw , felt and heard isn't real the red ,green and blue colour you saw evwryday never exist to begin with .
When you see speedsters in movies like the Flash, time isn't slowing down for them , they are just moving really fast and we are seeing what they are seeing. The people are still moving at normal speeds. Time isn't slowing down, the speedster is just moving faster than them.
Oddly, neither Pietro, Barry or Wally increased in mass while moving through time.
Exactly. Pigeons, like many birds, have a faster temporal resolution for auditory and visual stimuli compared to humans, so they perceive people moving and speaking much slower than we do. To a pigeon, events seem to happen slower than we experience them, but that's because its "internal clock" runs faster than ours, not because time is running at a different rate.
@@nissemus I believe there's a rough correlation between lifespan and heart rate, could that correlation extend to sense of time as well? How does a tortoise sense time at 25 beats per minute during it's 125 year plus life?
Exactly. The reference frame of the speedster is **not** the same as for the bystanders. Therefore their clock moves slower allowing them to do _many more_ things more quickly than the bystanders can perceive. They aren't stopping time. They are slowing their own reference frame, the speedsters, giving the outward affect of being super fast.
I was thinking this exact thing also.
Arvin, its about time you made this video
I see what you did there . . .
Ba-dum tss
Fun concept. But Neo in the Matrix didnt slow or stop time. He simply stopped the bullets because he could change the Matrix as he saw fit.
So he stopped the time for the bullets themselves. Well, then you'd basically see pure nothingness where the bullets actually are, i guess it would look black, but it could just look like actual pure nothingness wich is something only blind people seem to actually comperhend.
@@loganwolv3393 No, he would still see them, because the Matrix is a computer-simulated environment, so the limitations of normal physics don't apply. Basically, it's like causing your computer screen to freeze up. You can still see the screen.
This is what I actually thought what something going to happen when I stop the time. Great job
"At this time, I would like to burst another bubble." Nice!
I thought in the Flash, the guy just moves, thinks, and reacts so fast that his perception of time changes, not time itself.
It would be fun to calculate the effects of something moving so fast near people. I imagine destructive heat burns, pressure shock waves... And sonic booms if fast enough. Not so much fun. 😂
@@andreubs Oh yeah, there are a million problems with the Flash, but violating causality ain't one of them.
@@Kelnx It is one of them since The Flash can rewind time.
I have thought of that question all my life.I thought that I would never have an answer. And now the answer is here in this video!Thank you for sharing!
Time being an illusion is not about time not being real, but rather that it's not as we experience it, and that there is a reference point from where time does not exist.
Nice. You expressed the reason for my discomfort without me having to work it out.
The past (everything) is dual to the future (nothing) -- time duality.
We know everything about the past as we have experienced or measured it and nothing about the future as it has not happened yet.
"Physics is what we know and metaphysics is what we do not know" -- Bertrand Russell.
Knowledge is dual!
Physics (a posteriori or measured) is dual to metaphysics (a priori or not measured) -- synthetic a priori knowledge, Immanuel Kant.
Absolute time (Galileo) is dual to relative time (Einstein) -- time duality.
Time is a dual concept.
Space is dual to time -- Einstein.
Everything (a posteriori) is dual to nothing (a priori) synthesizes the present (something).
Concepts are dual to percepts -- the mind duality of Immanuel Kant.
The concept of the future or nothing is built from your past experiences or knowledge (history, memory).
"Always two there are" -- Yoda.
Your mind is creating something from nothing -- time duality!
Define 'real'.
@@MrJustMaxxer No.
Ask Arvin.
That's what Illuminati want .
Wow! Really fabulous ❤❤❤❤❤ thank you so much! Clear as usual, but even more intriguing ❤❤❤❤
Fascinating video, my friend!
Many thanks! Thanks for stopping by.
Thanks for this amazing video. It is quite interesting that a high fashion company such as Philip Patek makes atomic clocks as well.
I was looking forward to this video, it did not disappoint, thank you!
Yes, I’m being pedantic here, but that’s why comments exist.
Technically, your inclusion of scenes from The Matrix was an error. The premise of that movie franchise is that our reality is simulated and, hence, the apparent laws of nature can change instantly for one person, many people, or everyone. It’s just programming.
Given such a premise, the movies’ depiction of slowed/stopped time isn’t inconsistent with reality (in those movies).
Indeed pedantic, and indeed correct. I love this kind of nitpicking! so thank you!
Awesome video! I'm exploring these issues as they relate to theology.
Learned something new. Thank you Arvin
Back in my 20s I overdosed on a drug. I had to be brought back with Narcan.
I guess I was out for 20 minutes. Blue skin, I wasnt breathing, brain was lacking oxygen. I was basically dead. Maybe 1% vital functions. When I got brought back, I literally had no idea time had passed. My brain wasn't recording because it was shut down.
For me it was like that 20 minutes didn't even exist.
thats what death feels like lil bro
Happens every night to most people... We call is sleep.
When I was having surgery, I was 100% resolute on counting down from 10 and actually reaching zero.
And I succeeded! Booyah!
(Well, except for the part where I'd had surgery somewhere between 5... and 4... 😂)
Doc was like: "Nope... look around you, man. You're in recovery."
People that have major epileptic attacks, experience a loss of memory off about 10-15 minuts up to the attack, and can really remember the first few minutes after. Thats because they lose their short term memory, which is stored in neuroloops, and they have yet to be made permanent neuron loops. And when they wake up, the entire brain has to get all the systems working, it has to fill up the short term memory, make itself aware of where you are what's happening and so on, that takes (UPPS there the word again) TIME !!
We're glad you're still here
Well, there goes another childhood fantasy.
Thanks, Arvin. Thanks, physics.
I love Arvin's way of describing things. He's my top science guy!
Not to mention that stopping time would reduce the local temperature suddenly to absolute zero. You'd be very cold. But if you could somehow do it, the other problem is that any motion you made would create sonic booms for everybody around you once you started time again. You'd push all air molecules out of the way, like walking through deep snow. When you started time again, they'd suddenly snap back into place. BOOM! Ouch. My ears. The same thing would happen to light, as you pushed all the photons away. When you started time again, there would be an incredibly brief blackness for somebody standing behind the path you took. When time resumed the light would nearly instantly fill that blackness once again, so it wouldn't be notice. But the sonic boom would probably knock everyone on their asses.
Heat does not exist, but rather is our interpretation of molecular velocity, or meters per second. If the divisor were zero due to no time change, it would be meaningless since division by zero is meaningless. Which means it is impossible to stop time. So, the whole video is interesting but actually not a reflection of reality.
@@jackieow how does light stop time then
I guess the absolute zero thing may be the case if the molecules you interacted with gained time/movement once they came in contact with you, due to your movement into them. But assuming no movement at all, you wouldn't be able to move at all through it, as the air wouldn't "give". Also, it probably wouldn't feel cold since I believe your heat needs to leave you in order for you to feel cold. With no time outside of you, no heat would escape from you. Basically, if you can't move anything around you, then you are actually as stationary as everything else...like having a block of ice flash-frozen around you...but again, without the cold (as the ice molecules would take heat from your body and warm up, with some areas touching your skin possibly even melting due to it, while particles that didn't experience time would not melt). On the topic of phase changes, if things did more as you approached them, and you had the strength to get through the air, if there were pressure waves as you mentioned, then it could be that you could push air and make it into a liquid or even solid with enough of that pressure in one place, where the molecules get bunched up. Interesting to think about.
@@rainofrest7778 According to Relativity Light does not stop time. It has no concept of time dilation. Time always progresses at the maximum rate for a photon :)
@@axle.student no bozo light doesnt experince time or distance from its experience its already made its journey
Thank you, Ash
Great mind boggling topic once again.... Plz. Keep doing this type of subjects ❤❤❤❤
Brilliant! 💖
A few other issues with stopping time for everyone other than you: thermal convection and radiation stop working - so you could not gain any heat from the environment, but you also couldn't shed any heat, so it's plausible that you could overheat, since your metabolic processes would keep running and generating heat you could not lose. It's entirely questionable as to whether or not you'd experience air pressure, since the gas molecules around you, having come to a complete standstill, would exert no pressure on you or the air molecules closest to your skin. Also, since gravity is a function of time, it's entirely plausible that you'd feel no gravitational effects, since the mass of your body would be causally disconnected from interacting with the gravitational effects of any other mass.
Heat is non existent, but is our interpretation of molecular meters per second. If there were no time and no per second divisor, this would be division by zero which is meaningless. Which shows time cannot stop and the video is merely an impossible speculation.
LOVE AND RESPECT ❤️🙏🏻💚
" That's coming up, right now...". I get so excited when he says that phrase. I'm like "ohh, goodyy".
u like that huh baby girl
Time and relativity... and reference frame...!!!
THANK YOU...
DR. ASH...!!!
Thanks Arvin. You described this quite accurately according to accepted physics (accept for the time being real part).
>
For me this has so many ambiguities and contradictions that I don't know where to start lol (That is not a criticism of you, just weakness in conceptual aspects of the theory as I see it)
I am not an indentured physicist. Just working from a lifetime of personal education across multiple science disciplines.
>
Let's first consider the concept of time never stopping or being a fundamental and unstoppable progression. This invokes a somewhat differently constructed universe to a universe with the version of time that is non real or just an abstract measurement. We can envision many examples of a cold universe with no movement and no time, or concepts of no progression of time before the big bang for example.
Look forward to you next video :)
>
Local and global reference frames. At what point do we draw the line between one reference frame and another? In your descriptions here we have a very complicated mix of independent reference frames declare as a single reference frame. At what point do we declare that a local reference frame is global? In most examples (especially relating to time dilation in flat space (SR)) local and global reference frames tend to get blurred together, as well as the description of the real object and a distant view of the object. This shows up in the SR time dilation due to velocity paradoxes. I don't believe time dilation due to gravity (accelleration) and time dilation due to velocity are the same thing or even directly related. SR time dilation due to velocity is just an optical illusion of the viewer (but useful to calculate what that distant object is doing by accounting for the visual illusion.) I don't believe time dilation due to velocity only has ever been experimentally tested in flat space (Outside of the influence of gravity due to mass or acceleration due to angular velocity.)
>
The list continues, but these issues tend to present at the boundaries in a similar way to your boundary bubble for the hypothetical stopped time. That event horizon of the bubble seams to contain a small error that is the difference between a rational number and an irrational number. It is an "off by 0.000...1", It is the difference between a version of relativity that can describe the boundaries such as event horizons, and one that gets trapped into commonly found infinities and weird paradoxes.
>
Space-time and 'c' Work well for current application but are somewhat ambiguous at the extremes.
The past (everything) is dual to the future (nothing) -- time duality.
We know everything about the past as we have experienced or measured it and nothing about the future as it has not happened yet.
"Physics is what we know and metaphysics is what we do not know" -- Bertrand Russell.
Knowledge is dual!
Physics (a posteriori or measured) is dual to metaphysics (a priori or not measured) -- synthetic a priori knowledge, Immanuel Kant.
Absolute time (Galileo) is dual to relative time (Einstein) -- time duality.
Time is a dual concept.
Space is dual to time -- Einstein.
Everything (a posteriori) is dual to nothing (a priori) synthesizes the present (something).
Concepts are dual to percepts -- the mind duality of Immanuel Kant.
The concept of the future or nothing is built from your past experiences or knowledge (history, memory).
"Always two there are" -- Yoda.
Your mind is creating something from nothing -- time duality!
@@hyperduality2838 It's called "Yin Yang"
@Arvin, a fun exercise with time is imagining that you capture a short scene in a kind of video camera that records space in 3D and time as a 4th dimension. You can keep all this data in a 4d array and then reshape it to have the time dimension in place of a spatial dimension. Then you "play" the scene aling the spatial dimension as if it was time. The scene would be bizarre. Nothing would make much sense. You would see a 2D slice of everything that happened at that current plane during all the time at once.
I have not actually tried it but seems doable with an animation software. And of course I know time dimension is of a different nature than the spatial dimensions and you can exchange them, but not sure why.
The moment "time" stops (literally meaning the phenomenal evolution of correlation of different bundles of space as matter stops) no"thing" remains (of course including "bodies") so there is nothing to terrify anybody. It is at the behest or ""pressure"" of time that space evolves giving time its apparent existence.
If time stopped for everything except you, how could you move through the air? All the molecules would be frozen in place. How could you breath if air couldn't move? How could sunlight be bright or warm if photons weren't moving? How could matter even exist if electrons weren't orbiting their nuclei?
Time is just nature's way of stopping everything happening all at once.
The past (everything) is dual to the future (nothing) -- time duality.
We know everything about the past as we have experienced or measured it and nothing about the future as it has not happened yet.
"Physics is what we know and metaphysics is what we do not know" -- Bertrand Russell.
Knowledge is dual!
Physics (a posteriori or measured) is dual to metaphysics (a priori or not measured) -- synthetic a priori knowledge, Immanuel Kant.
Absolute time (Galileo) is dual to relative time (Einstein) -- time duality.
Time is a dual concept.
Space is dual to time -- Einstein.
Everything (a posteriori) is dual to nothing (a priori) synthesizes the present (something).
Concepts are dual to percepts -- the mind duality of Immanuel Kant.
The concept of the future or nothing is built from your past experiences or knowledge (history, memory).
"Always two there are" -- Yoda.
Your mind is creating something from nothing -- time duality!
one of the most interesting videos out there
You would have to have a complete universe inside your bubble for this to work. Our bodies perceive air pressure, time, heat, cold, sound, taste, touch etc. If the universe outside ourselves stopped all our interactions with it that feed into the senses would stop as well unless recreated within the bubble. Essentially you can't stop time without completely recreating time since time and the subject experiencing it aren't separate from each other. It's one movement.
Unless we live in a matrix.
We already have that.
If you allow the physics to act on that bubble (event horizon) and allow it to expand at the speed of light like any other event horizon, then you have just created the fundamental concept of an infinite universe :)
Excellent video
Deep thoughts
‘The cushion’ is generally the electron cloud. The person in the centre is the nucleus. Just the matter of having an electron that never loses momentum around the nucleus gives us the universe we see.(and bump our toes against). Have fun living in your wobbly gelatinous, wavy universe.
Wonderful explanation. In the book "Momo" by Michael.Ende, the hero of the story, a little girl, gets a gift of one hour of time to save the world, while it's standing still, before the evil "time saving bank" destroys it all.❤Ufortunately we have to do it inside the time.
I can't tell you how much it tickled me watching this, I've thought of this so many times and it's like you're in my head. My first thought was "oh shit you'd just be frozen where you are like a statue, the air around you and currently in your lungs may as well be a perfectly form fitting iron glove, and you'd suffocate. So okay, a bubble around you where time moves normally, well crap it would be pitch black. And also walking near people might mess them up. And a bunch of permutations where you try to exclude other biological material from the bubble and get stabbed by frozen grass or something. Then you hit a bunch of those points and I had such a booyah moment lol.
Wasn't there an old Twilight Zone where a guy walks into a shop and tosses a quarter onto the counter to buy a newspaper and the coin lands on its edge? At that moment, everything around him freezes--until the quarter tips over. One of the best episodes ever.
I need to watch this series again. There are lot of episodes I never saw; certainly want to see this one now!
Credit H. G. Wells for inventing an enduring Syfy trope.
This happened to me once. I mean I dropped some change on the floor and a nickel landed on its edge… not the time stopping part of course.
Actually, in that episode he could hear what other people were thinking until the coin tips over ("A Penny for Your Thoughts"). There was a different episode where a guy gets a stopwatch that freezes time ("A Kind of Stopwatch"). In another episode a gal finds a pendent that stops time ("A Little Peace and Quiet'). [I'm old, so watched all of these in their original TV runs.]
@@civwar64bob77 Thanks for the recommendations. Will check 'em out.
You show these examples of character that experience time stopping but ignore the best example, the last episode of Futurama!
Time as most humans think about it is relative, and the way this could work is not that the universe slowed down, but that you sped up. Think high speed cameras making everything appear really slow by running really fast.
Man, you sure burst my bubble. I guess I can't daydream about stopping time now. 😢
Amazing vids! Time is just causation changes caused by the warping of space due to speed and/or gravity.
That fails to explain causation and the seeming passage of time in the regime where space is flat (zero gravity) and speed is low. That's the regime where we age fastest... speed and/or gravity reduce the rate of change.
Time doesn't slow down. Stuff slows down. Time isn't a thing. Time is a word we use to describe the relation of cause and effect.
Time is a measure of change, but what causes change. Energy? What is energy? "The capacity to do work"? What has the capacity to do work? The answer is an operative definition of time, and not a descriptive one.
The past (everything) is dual to the future (nothing) -- time duality.
We know everything about the past as we have experienced or measured it and nothing about the future as it has not happened yet.
"Physics is what we know and metaphysics is what we do not know" -- Bertrand Russell.
Knowledge is dual!
Physics (a posteriori or measured) is dual to metaphysics (a priori or not measured) -- synthetic a priori knowledge, Immanuel Kant.
Absolute time (Galileo) is dual to relative time (Einstein) -- time duality.
Time is a dual concept.
Space is dual to time -- Einstein.
Everything (a posteriori) is dual to nothing (a priori) synthesizes the present (something).
Concepts are dual to percepts -- the mind duality of Immanuel Kant.
The concept of the future or nothing is built from your past experiences or knowledge (history, memory).
"Always two there are" -- Yoda.
Your mind is creating something from nothing -- time duality!
@@alexgonzo5508 The universe's expansion is this energy you speak of. The source of what we call the fabric of space/time.
@@Cybersawz So is the expansion a result of the energy, or is the energy a result of the expansion?
@@alexgonzo5508 Good question. No one knows for sure why the universe is expanding. My guess is there has to be energy of some sort being put into the universe in order to cause the expansion. But what is the source of this energy? Hmmm....
Excellent explanation! Almost perfect. It's just that the depiction right after 4:08 would be just like the next example of not having a cushion around your body, so instead of passing out and falling down, you'd be held in place by the static air molecules right around you, and just like with the cushion example, you wouldn't see anything, either. But yeah, this was still a very nice video!
Allah hu akbar
interesting thought experiment, never thought of that
Actually, there is the possibility of time stopping in one place relative to another one: Time at an event horizon stops relative to any observer away from it.
Yes, passing of time can be different from the perspective of two different reference frames, as I stated in the video.
The past (everything) is dual to the future (nothing) -- time duality.
We know everything about the past as we have experienced or measured it and nothing about the future as it has not happened yet.
"Physics is what we know and metaphysics is what we do not know" -- Bertrand Russell.
Knowledge is dual!
Physics (a posteriori or measured) is dual to metaphysics (a priori or not measured) -- synthetic a priori knowledge, Immanuel Kant.
Absolute time (Galileo) is dual to relative time (Einstein) -- time duality.
Time is a dual concept.
Space is dual to time -- Einstein.
Everything (a posteriori) is dual to nothing (a priori) synthesizes the present (something).
Concepts are dual to percepts -- the mind duality of Immanuel Kant.
The concept of the future or nothing is built from your past experiences or knowledge (history, memory).
"Always two there are" -- Yoda.
Your mind is creating something from nothing -- time duality!
immediately i want the next video 🎉
"Reverse Entropy" and "Reunite Gondwanaland" are my fave bumped stickered sentences. Parents national scientists and more, moi languages/literatures, originally. Very measured voice, manner, info. Bravo.
The past (everything) is dual to the future (nothing) -- time duality.
We know everything about the past as we have experienced or measured it and nothing about the future as it has not happened yet.
"Physics is what we know and metaphysics is what we do not know" -- Bertrand Russell.
Knowledge is dual!
Physics (a posteriori or measured) is dual to metaphysics (a priori or not measured) -- synthetic a priori knowledge, Immanuel Kant.
Absolute time (Galileo) is dual to relative time (Einstein) -- time duality.
Time is a dual concept.
Space is dual to time -- Einstein.
Everything (a posteriori) is dual to nothing (a priori) synthesizes the present (something).
Concepts are dual to percepts -- the mind duality of Immanuel Kant.
The concept of the future or nothing is built from your past experiences or knowledge (history, memory).
"Always two there are" -- Yoda.
Your mind is creating something from nothing -- time duality!
Great explanation, thanks.
Arvin, I think you need to watch the Futurama episode “Meanwhile”. Jeez, do your research!
Now I want to see you make a video talking about what it would be like if: Literally everything outside of your air bubble was moving at 99.999999% c in tiny little circles. That would create a scenario somewhat like the ones we see in movies. Though everything would still be pitch black, no laws of physics would be broken save for the non-law-breaking question of where is all that energy coming from.
What you are describing is not time stopping, but all motion stopping. If all motion stopped, time would still continue. Time does not need motion, or a device to calculate it, in order for it to exist. The only way that time could possibly stop is if there were no universe for time to exist in. Basically, absolute nothingness.
Movement is a change of position over a length of time.
If time does not pass, then there is no way to have a change of position
If you had a bubble of air around you where time still moved, you’d still suffocate pretty quickly
Unless the bubble acts as a solid barrier, the air molecules would stop once they reach the edge of the bubble, creating a high pressure film of air on the bubble’s surface, but since the air outside the bubble is stopped, no new air comes in, and you are quickly exposed to vacuum
In Michaël Ende's 'Momo' there is a scene where the Lord of time, Master Hora, goes to sleep in order to get rid of the grey men who live on stolen time in form of hour flowers they dry and smoke in cigarettes.
Momo, the heroine of the story, gets an hour flower in order to pursue the grey men and free all the stolen time they've stored.
In this vision, the world looks like a 3D standing image where even soft stuff is completely hard. As far as I remember, one of the grey men even hits his head at a flying feather.
Notably, the air isn't hard; everyone can move through it, just as if it weren't there.
actually everything in the universe is always travelling at maximum speed through 4 dimension space time. If you’re sitting still then your clocks are ticking at the fastest possible speed. When you start to move through space, you need to convert some of the speed in the time dimension into speed in the space dimension. This is why time slows down more the faster you move. In other words, the only way for your clock to stop is if you travelled at the speed of light.
Birds aren't real, neither is time! Fight me 😂
_Stops time_
_Sneezes_
_Starts time_
*Big Bang intensifies*
What’s curious here is that every human as a child has a dream of stopping time to become able to manipulate the world to your favor by turning it back on when your are ready so, why’s that? How do we so readily imagine this?
My guess is that It's a great fantasy because we always want to either redo our past mistakes or be able to slow down the seemingly swift movement of time, and the changes that come with it.
It is purely a biological (physiological) excretion/illusion from the way evolution created us. I used to, in a naive way, as a child pull apart mechanical clocks to find time and how time worked... maybe manipulate it a little.
By this notion then, if a device was able to slow down the flow of time, a second inertial reference frame would be created. Although physics 'doesn't allow this' more to the point we cannot currently do it - but it happens naturally whenever there is motion. Therefore if we forced this and a slow of time was achieved then our device would move, we would have caused it to gain velocity. However this would not be Newtonian motion as we are used to, the effect of motion would extend as a field around the device.
I haven’t seen the flash, so I’m assuming a little about what is portrayed, but if your brain was made faster, so you perceive things more often, you would see things in slow motion, as you are perceiving 1 second more times than you would normally. This combined with incredible speed would allow you to “slow time” as you perceive each second more times, but move faster to make up for the difference.
I would argue they never stop time in the movies, they slow it down to a crawl
lol. Yes, many movies not days.
The past (everything) is dual to the future (nothing) -- time duality.
We know everything about the past as we have experienced or measured it and nothing about the future as it has not happened yet.
"Physics is what we know and metaphysics is what we do not know" -- Bertrand Russell.
Knowledge is dual!
Physics (a posteriori or measured) is dual to metaphysics (a priori or not measured) -- synthetic a priori knowledge, Immanuel Kant.
Absolute time (Galileo) is dual to relative time (Einstein) -- time duality.
Time is a dual concept.
Space is dual to time -- Einstein.
Everything (a posteriori) is dual to nothing (a priori) synthesizes the present (something).
Concepts are dual to percepts -- the mind duality of Immanuel Kant.
The concept of the future or nothing is built from your past experiences or knowledge (history, memory).
"Always two there are" -- Yoda.
Your mind is creating something from nothing -- time duality!
Arthur, good 👍🏼 work once again, but you overlooked the 4D Space-time Continuum.
If Time were to stop just in yiur local reference frame, the rest of the planet would keep moving. By the time you restarted time in your Frame, you'd be left behind in the vscuum of space, by tens of thousands of km or more. You'd die. The same applies to "going back in time", because the earth, sun and galaxy have moved. 🤯
If I didn't make a mistake in flash movie, time was not frozen for others but rather the speed of the moving of the flash was increased !
Like we have our speed of moving but the speed of light around us is high!
Hi Arvin, excellent video once again. I agree with just about everything. One thing I view differently is the nature of time.
Yes, time is real but it is abstract. Just as thoughts, memeories, emotions, numbers, math, letters, words, and lamguage are real yet abstract.Therefore, time, being abstract, does not actually move, nor have a direction, nor stop since it doesn't move in the first place. But, they and, time are psychologically real but not physically real. Time is not made of anything, because it is abstract.
Time emerges from consciousness, which itself is emergent. They both emerge from the same processes. Heart beats sending neural impulses to the brain as brain rhythms. Hence, we have the concept, perception, and sense, of time. We have time intrinsically part of our psyche we can't get away from it. We use time to ultimately measure motion. That which moves is energy and motion, not time as the measurement of motion. Often the motion of energy and matter being measured by time is thiught ro be time itself in motion.
Time helps us and other conscious entities make sense of motion, sequences, cause and effect as is measured by our brains. Hand and eye coordination, catching a ball, picking up a fork requires timing.
But our intrinsic sense of time is less accurate or long periods, distances, and faster motion. So we resort to rhe motion of, in, and about devices, apparatuses, and celestial bodies to more accurate determine the elapse of time. Everywhere we measure there is motion and we attribute a time to all motion. 😊
Interesting perspective. I would argue that time is not abstract, that it is real. It exists and has a one-way direction. It is in our physics equations. It is as real, imo, as energy and force.
@@ArvinAsh
Thanks for replying. Yes time is real, just not physically real. Some abstract things are real, such as time, just like math. But neither has any tangible, visible, nor auditory aspects or components. But, I do agree that time is real.
@@bnjm8868 There is a long time ambiguity about this that exist in physics. It's a convention because no one can actually work it out with proof. Central problem to all current physics issues including Quantum gravity.
In my opinion.
@@axle.student
Yeah, I know. It really is a "you can't see the forest because of the trees" situation or "Naïve realism" is the belief that we see the world precisely as it is, without acknowledging the influence of personal biases, experiences, or emotions on our perceptions.
Reification involves treating an abstract concept or subjective experience as if it were a concrete, objective reality.
Time is from the observer, not from that which is in motion outside the observer.
@@bnjm8868 It's a difficult one, but if no biology existed, would the universe natural still have some expression of movement one moment to the next. I expect so, but is it just an emergent property out of movement, or something more fundamental and persistent.
Modern physics takes a perspective that time is just progression/motion in the universe and our need to measure a period of past photons (information).
The other is where time is more fundamental like a driving force which seams to be rejected by most modern physics.
Weird part is relativity kind of (seams to) blur both concepts of time to some extent. It was like they couldn't really pick one so they mashed both in lol
It's not an issue until we get to edge cases at event horizons and then it gets weird, like being able to time travel etc. :)
Space-time is weirder than fiction sometimes :)
ZAAAA WARUDO!
Star Platinum ZA WARDOU!!! ORA ORA ORA ORA ORA ORA ORA ORA!!!
There’s no need to shout.
I've already thought of this. What if someone tortures you, and then rewinds time, and then tortures you again, etc. Over and over again for a year, and then he lets time run normally and stops torturing you. At first, that was scary to think about. But then I realized that you'd remember nothing about it, and so it doesn't matter. Though I don't think time is real, so this couldn't happen anyways.
Flash isn't slowing time, he is just faster than everyone. But I get it, it's a relevant example for a thought experiment.
What about at a white-hole's event horizon? Due to the extreme spacetime curvature, the closer you approach a white-hole, the slower and more red-shifted the universe appears to you until it eventually stops?
I know it's not the same thing as what you're talking about because you don't experience the flow of time in more than one way per reference frame, but it's the closest thing I can think of.
Infinity close to stopped but never stopped. The red shift will stretch until the wave is so long that we cannot detect it, but it is still there and traveling at 'c' :)
The subjective experience of the passage of time from an observer is an illusion created by that observer's naturally selected brain, also the idea that space and time are separate is an illusion. In fact, the idea that anything is separate from everything is also an illusion. 😎🤖
The change in Time is actually a change in Entropy. If Entropy was zero, Time would appear to stand still. The reason Time appear to move in one direction is because Entropy typically increases, and it is a "State function" in thermodynamics, and does not inherently depend on "Time".
So, by saying time is not real, it means as a dimension.
QUESTION?:
I saw someone saying that (was it here?) acceleration is the cause for one's clock slowing. If that's true, then once one achieves a high velocity, for argument's sake - 90%c, one's relative clock should return to that of all other bodies moving at that speed. So, all of the (relative) slowed clock time would be entirely contained within the acceleration time of the journey.
*_YES???_*
Maybe it was Hossenfelder's channel... 🤔
I always liked the movies "Clockstoppers" and "The Langoliers" where time slows down almost stopping. It sure would be a good ability to have (assuming I could start time back up to 'normal'.
Stephen hawking said the big bang center is in the tip of the nose of everyone of us. This emphasize all of us are INNER to universe spacetime 4D. Being inner, the size of that singularity can only be quantified by one observer at dimension above the 4D, not by us. Also today we are inner the same 4D and we are and see movement everywhere. The fundamental physics law here, inner 4D is the Movement and the causation implication, have a limit of "c". Speed is movment, and c limit rules its components, "s" and "t". This video exposes very well that. At yhe same reference frame all respect the 4D laws, but the cinema put the hero as someone 5D, with all paradox created by not respecting 4D universe laws. Science asylum have one video showing in a full 4D chart, nothing moves, but this can only be perceived by a observer dimension above. Like this, the Dimensions must be well explained at physics, else we enter the regression to infinity of put dimensions above to explain the below. Like space time channel explained , inverse square law of propagation rulling in our 3D space universe, implies a 1/r^3 law in a 4D space universe, and that cannot physically exist.
Not even the Gods can overcome time - Thor once fought an old lady, and to his surprise he started to lose, he did not know that they had pitched him against time !
What is interesting, is that it only runs in one direction, just like the total entropy always increases - and that has probably something to do with time. Otherwise we could reverse the entropy ! Now wouldn't that be lovely in my messy cellar !
So, when we die, it is the same scenario. We won't know that we died. Time is a vital part of living, there is no time/space after we die.
I have another view of that: if I really could move in this set environment, as when time also means space, I might be just stuck, but aware. And I couldn't really see myself but older versions of the universe depending on the distance I move (if I could) where local em-peaks to perceive travelled by the speed of light just in the actual holographic event horizon when time stopped. I could even see the back of my own head propably. It's still relative, isn't it? Time is nothing but a concept. We just measure periods, that's it: our idea of time.
Anybody else love swing? :)
Also, just like there's nothing to rule out that time has just randomly stopped for a thousand years 10 seconds ago, there's also nothing ruling out that time has reversed for those thousand years.
Ergo, there's no reason to believe there's an arrow of time at all, or that it only runs in one direction when the math solutions work both ways.
To put it another way: Without an external reference frame we cannot be guaranteed that time isn't running backwards _right now_ 😮
if time stop, photons would not move. in order to get an idea of what was around you, you'd have to do a strange set of movements attempting to collect relevant photons.
Time flows faster at higher elevations, and slower at lower.
But beneath sea level, I think time speeds up again? At the center of the Earth, there is no local gravity, and time is the same as in outer space.
So time in Death Value actually flows at the same speed as slightly above sea level.
Arvin, the increased gravity of Gargantua wasn’t enough to crush them or increase escape velocity for the ship? This is a great episode. Thanks!
IMO holding your breath to pause time is a great weaknesses for speedsters, now their speed only last for as long as they can hold their breath, without a limitation they are gods.
Time would not stop. Time never stops. What would stop is any motion or change anywhere in the Universe.
In a 60s Startrek episode Captain Kirk was somehow transported to a dimension that was existing at close to the speed of light. On board the Enterprise, the entire crew, from Kirk’s point of view, was stationary. And the crew could not see Captain Kirk because he was moving so fast.
Ditto for Outer Limits episode, where guy has to stop a truck from running over a kid by fetching a seat belt from his own car to tie in the truck about to cause the accident.
С детства задавался этим вопросом. Что если время идет не плавно, а рывками. Порой останавливаясь или даже хуже - преимущественно находится в остановленном состоянии... Мы как существа находящиеся внутри этой метрики, никогда не заметим этого. Течение времени всегда будет плавным и непрерывным...
This is an old 70's sci fi plot. Look up the movie: "The Girl, The Gold Watch and Dynamite".
If you were still able to move while time was stopped for everything else and you contacted anything, the impact would be near infinite in speed. Anything you touched would explode in a fusion explosion as would your finger.
Finally, a Stand to surpass The World!!
I think of it like you would actually see photons putting reality together like in real time
Perfect use of AI!
I wish you were here having coffee with me so I could ask questions. I got myself in a TimeLoop and I don't know why. I believe your daughter does Readings?? What Time is she in? Long story short, there was a situation in 1980 and later the movie "Sphere" has all the details of that time, (minus the violence). At the same time things were so crazy that I started doing collages of my Visions....and now those things are coming to pass.
Thought this was an episode of Check it out with Dr Steve Brule with that poem in the beginning.
I thought time stopped while watching but when it was over, I was just more late for work
I guess a counter argument would be that someone like Quicksilver is just moving very fast and doesnt manipulate time, but that just takes one impossible feat of physics manipulation and turns in to several impossible feats, like how does he ignore friction to the point of being able to slip through air rendered compressed enough at these speeds to sear your skin off? Oh, presumably except for the soles of his shoes at which point friction has to go off the charts to stop them just slipping right over the ground? How does he take everything in thats happening at multiple times the speed of sound in a small room? (Your brain is actually much slower than any bog standard CPU, but makes up for it in staggering levels of parallelism, but thats not useful if getting across the room happens before a signal can travel between one part of the brain and another...) Im sure others can come up with more reasons physics doesnt work all that well regardless.
Ive sometimes wondered what a more realistic speedster could be like. I think it could be interesting. Maybe their brain would be mutated in such a way that processing certain actions can happen twice as fast as a normal human. Maybe it could have detrimental side effects outside of those certain actions. Perhaps they have to train excessively to have a body capable of keeping up with their mind, training reflexes etc. Or perhaps they even have to injure themselves pushing their muscles too far to accomplish their heroic feats.
I have this common movie script I wrote as a teenager when something like this happens, and _over time_ everyone looks like my kids. Idk how that happened, but I can guess. Quite a common story I've been told. 🤔