Because among other things, covert narcissists like to spread their misery around as much as possible, they are convinced they are always right, and they suffer from the delusion that everyone thinks the same way they do.
I am white and was adopted into a family. My brother is an Apache, my sister is Hawaiian, I have two half sisters who are Mohave Indian. I had to attend race relations classes in the 1970's in the Army. Soldiers do not see color on the battlefield.
It takes a special breed of evil individual to not only convince people that there's an invisible enemy but then get them to hand over _money_ to fight that enemy. If I didn't know better, that sounds an awful lot like some sort of _religion!_
Robil Diangelo is probably the reason that I have been boycotting coke and it's products for years! Thanks, Robin, for your racism, and for cutting my sugar consumption!
The painting was also from the perspective of a white Italian. If some one in India paints a religious scene, it would most definitely have brown Indians as subjects. If someone in an Eskimo tribe painted a religious scene, you would see Eskimos. In the Congo, the painting would have black subjects. In Norway, they would be white.
@@seeekerman1342.The jury was made up of people from NYC and the Trump lawyers weren't allowed to cross examine her lawyers "witnesses," while Trump's lawyers also couldn't call witnesses that debunked her "witnesses." The trial was an example of a kangaroo court, and that decision will be thrown out on Trump's appeal.
What would you find if you looked at African art from the early 1500s, North American art from the early 1500s, South American art from the early 1500s, and Asian art from the early 1500s? People depicted in such art would look like the locals. You wouldn't find Africans in Aztec and Mayan art, or Asians in African art, or Europeans in Asian art. Clearly, 500 years ago, EVERYBODY was racist, and racist against people they didn't even know existed! SHOCKING!
it just shows they never understood diversity in the 1500s, no xenomorphs, no predators, non of the marvel superheroes, no aquaman, wonder woman or ET...... disapointing really, so set in their ways back then.
I was going to make a post saying the same thing. The Painting was what the artist knew. People in areas were of the same race and that’s was portrayed in their art. I haven’t seen any African art, but would it have any non-African people in it?
The old wisdom was that education was not proof of intelligence or wisdom. Now, it's that a degree is not proof of knowledge or education. We have a rapidly increasing number of people whose degrees aren't worth what it cost the college to print them.
You're shocked that the mainstream media is "ignoring" soft-ball, pro-Putin/Russia propaganda and misinformation from Tucker Carlson of all people? Seriously? That said, the "MSM" isn't ignoring the interview at all, but they are quite critical of it, and rightfully so.
When I was a kid my mom always made sure from a young age that skin color is no different than having different eye color or hair color my mom would have beat me to a pulp if ever said anything racist. I wonder what the average black mother said about other races.
What if I just don't care if you think I'm racist. I won't be judged for being white and I don't care what haters think. I'm not racist but I'm not apologetic either.
Kat, women weren't owned property. They were the _wards_ of their parents or their husbands. This arrangement placed a set of rights and obligations on both parties. Married women, for instance, enjoyed the right to be financially supported by their husbands, dower rights, and rights of agency. Dower rights: if the couple owned a home, the husband could not sell it without the wife's permission. She had a right to live in that home, and he was legally prohibited from selling it out from under her. Rights of agency: this conferred the right to purchase necessaries like food, clothing and housewares on her husband's credit. She could pick out a bunch of stuff, tell the shopkeeper to put it on her husband's tab, and walk out with it. Incidentally, if the wife was overspending, the husband would have to go to each shop individually and notify the owners that he would no longer honor his wife's purchases. An ad in the local paper or a town crier announcement didn't hold water in court. Wives also enjoyed immunity from marital debt. The husband was the administrator of the marital estate, so if the couple fell into catastrophic debt, HE was the one who'd be sent to debtor's prison. Meanwhile, in the world of work, "sistren" have been recorded on the master rosters of various trade guilds going back to before the 1500s. In terms of trades, women (often single women with no prospects of marriage) dominated weaving, baking and brewing, leading to the feminized surnames Brewster, Baxter and Webster, which are common even today (passed down to unmarried tradeswomen's sons). And of course, the term "spinster" referred to the work commonly done by unmarried women who had no parents or husband to support them. That aside, women have been recorded as masters in ALL the trade guilds in Britain, including blacksmithing, going back to the 1400s and earlier. And women who married a tradesman had a cheat they could exploit. If he died, she could inherit his master status, hire journeymen and take on apprentices. It was _assumed_ that she had sufficiently learned the trade by being married to him and helping him run the business. Unmarried women earned income and owned property in their own names. There was no law forbidding lenders from extending credit to unmarried women, though lenders could exercise their own discretion. Young women had a tougher time getting loans than middle aged widows, for sure. Why? Because if that young woman subsequently got married, her husband would be the person responsible for repaying all her debts. Lenders kind of like to know who'll be on the hook for repayment so they can manage their risks. Widows were a different matter. First, they'd have a history of managing credit (rights of agency). Most wives behaved responsibly with their husband's credit reputation because not doing so hurt the entire family. Widows were also more likely than never-married women to remain unmarried. And an unmarried woman COULD be held accountable for her own debts. Marital coverture was a complex set of laws that bestowed rights, entitlements and responsibilities on both parties. But immunities? Those were for the wife alone. As for being "owned" by your parents, that's called children's privilege. The right to be fed, clothed and sheltered by your parents and to live under their protection and care. Women retained it in adulthood. Men did not.
On the Biden verdict: some of these documents go back decades, to his time in the senate, was he elderly with poor memory then?? What utter idiocy, and Kat called it: them why is he considered competent to be president??
I wanna know why not a single lawyer in Indiana will take a case against this corruption and tyranny by the Department of Justice. Take my money. It's literally your job.
If they are allowed to pick and choose what cases they take, that isn't very "enshrined right" of them. If people have a right to legal representation, their lawyer shouldn't be able to refuse a case. And if a Lawyer can't refuse a case, then they can't be held accountable if they lose, because they had no choice. Lawyers have a choice in who they represent, though, and chose to represent and win for people who are obviously guilty or who railroad people who are arguably innocent, or at least could be called "not guilty" Lawyers either shouldn't be able to choose who they represent or they should lose their immunity.
@@SupHapCak YOUR RIGHTS COME FROM YOUR CREATOR PER YOUR CONSTITUTION. READ IT. THEY CANNOT BE TAKEN BY THE GOVERNMENT AND THE BILL OF RIGHTS STATES THE GOVERNMENT DOES NOT HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO MAKE A RIGHT A CRIME OR REQUIRE A FINE, FEE OR TAX. YOU DO NOT KNOW YOUR RIGHTS. DON'T GIVE ADVICE.
@@_XR40_ I am something of an old fart (68), and my father reported on social attitudes from the 1930’s. He was not “white” either, at least to polite society. Grandpa was born in Oaxaca. BTW, I did read White Fragility, and DiAngelo does acknowledge that history, despite discounting it to push her thesis.
In the 1929 play Strictly Dishonarable by Preston Sturges one of the characters explains that the other character can get away with something because he’s ’white’ but he can’t because he’s Italian.
Maybe if they call themselves the _Buck_ Skins? I mean, they're from _Washington D.C._ you know. 🤣 ... Of course, there's always the name "Pirates," assuming Pittsburgh doesn't have a problem with it. (Probably a more appropriate name too.) 🏴☠
It’s fascinating how this lady Robin Di-Angelo creates issues and problems where there are not any. All for greed and money. Thanks for calling her out! Don’t feel sorry for the ignorant fools who believe this nonsense.
Robin D'Angelo is a terrible person in my opinion, which I'm allowed to have. A person searching endlessly for ways to make everything racist. What a mundane existence. Sad.
The funny thing about the fragility accusation is that if someone accusing you of being fragile stops you from pushing back then THAT is the only thing fragile. Poop on these people.
Tyrus is a cool gent. In the 1500's Greg would know as much about slavery as Tyrus would perhaps more. Slavery of millions of Europeans by Barbary corsairs, Ottomans, Arabs.
race baiters are like the elders in the movie The Village where "creatures are actually the elders disguised as the monsters to perpetuate the legend so they can scare and deter younger members from leaving"...
The 15th century was absolutely great for women. Protected and cared for by their loving fathers in youth , protected and cared for by their loving husbands thru out their lives , protected and cared for by their respectful loving eldest son in their old age. And they did not have to expose themselves on Only Fans to come up with some money for survival. It is our age that is the worse age for women. Wake up Kat.
That's great if you were a princess or lucky enough to be born into a rich man's home. Something tells me there weren't that many and may have had to do some rather disgusting things even if they were. So, imagine what it might have been like for a poor woman with no man in her life and no money as I'm sure there were a few of them also. Probably a few butt-ugly diseased ones too. It's not like there were very many laws that protected them from being treated like objects and sold into slavery by their own families (which absolutely happened and still happens in a countries like Somalia, Libya or North Korea).
@@mikeottersole Those poor women. It's a shame that only they had to deal with with pestilence and lack of air conditioning back then. Of course, your great-great-great-great-great-grandfather rocked those designer shoes.
Mike --- everyone back in those days had to deal with a different level of technology and medicine than we have now --- everyone --- wether male fo female. Most of the population lived an old fashion good active outdoor farming life tied to the land under the fuedal system in which they had to give a portion of their crops to the owner of the land , the fuedal lord every year -- a person they would actually know , talk with , and interact with. We still have fuedal lords here in this day as well ---- it is called the corporate CEO overlord . When was the last time you talked to the corporate CEO of the company you may work for ???? My guess is never. They at least could talk with their ""head"" boss directly and air the grievances --- us in this day and age --- not a chance. Do not fall into the trap that we have it ""better"" here in our age because of the babbles of technology , in a lot of ways , we have it worse -- much worse.@@mikeottersole
@@dner75-xh9le Apparently humour is wasted on you. Sorry, I refuse to romanticize the past. Things are so obviously better now, but of course could be better. We have huge problems. Your juvenile insults to my family history accomplish nothing.
If you think a kid in a costume should be punished in some way, you're never a good person
yup.
Is that why I feel guilty waiting for Greta's onlyfans?
Again,Tyrus hits the nail directly on the head!!!
First time I've commented on a Gutfield vid and did so specifically to say the exact same. He's awesome.
ikr..
So spot on
Agree!
Love Tyrus.
Why do we ALL have to suffer just because this Robin woman hates herself??
Exactly ! Could she please be done with her life already ? She's already a shame of herself for being born a white person. 😠
Kudos to Robin, seizing an opportunity for fame and fortune
Because among other things, covert narcissists like to spread their misery around as much as possible, they are convinced they are always right,
and they suffer from the delusion that everyone thinks the same way they do.
Because making other people suffer makes her feel better about herself.
Trump 2924
I am white and was adopted into a family. My brother is an Apache, my sister is Hawaiian, I have two half sisters who are Mohave Indian. I had to attend race relations classes in the 1970's in the Army. Soldiers do not see color on the battlefield.
Wars are safer environments than the US society
"The people who make a living from oppression will never tell you when the oppression is over."
It takes a special breed of evil individual to not only convince people that there's an invisible enemy but then get them to hand over _money_ to fight that enemy. If I didn't know better, that sounds an awful lot like some sort of _religion!_
@@WXSEDY I would contend that for many people, their religion has been replaced with politics.
So your speculation would not be far off base.
Poor Kid, I hope he wins. I'm so sick of the racist calling others racist. May God Bless him in the name of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ.
Racism, blame everything on racism, I am fed with all that kind of CRAP!!
Robil Diangelo is probably the reason that I have been boycotting coke and it's products for years! Thanks, Robin, for your racism, and for cutting my sugar consumption!
❤
What does she have to do with coke?
She likes trains... during visitation...
Deadspin will soon be DOA.
Some other scam will take it's place.
He's going to be the youngest millionaire if not billionaire when he's done suing them.
Yeah, I guess Nick Sandmann is a few years older.
Ally Cat Catcher 🤡👈🤣🤭
And where is this billion dollars coming from?
Angela is demanding you return the swing set you stole. @@andrelotscher280
White Replacement theory lies.
All those books on her shelf and she does not know who that is in the painting. I am so glad someone like that is telling me what my problem is.
Justice is served, right on, Gutfeld!
The painting was also from the perspective of a white Italian. If some one in India paints a religious scene, it would most definitely have brown Indians as subjects. If someone in an Eskimo tribe painted a religious scene, you would see Eskimos. In the Congo, the painting would have black subjects. In Norway, they would be white.
What would the painting portray of someone from Uranus? 🤔🤔🤔🤔
NFL plays TWO national anthems before each game OURS and a 'black' one. That's just wrong. We are one country.
@@arthurplant5962wasn’t that decided by a democrat majority Supreme Court, 7-2?
That's one of the reasons I don't watch football anymore and I'm a Cowboys fan for years. All the garbage started with Kappernik.
I only have one national anthem as an American. I don't honor other anthems or flags.
@@arthurplant5962 And what does the 13th Amendment has anything to do with this?
Hopefully, they do the black one with a human beat box.
The gave Carroll $80M for Trump calling her a nutcase regarding unproven assault claim. So this ought to be worth $250M at least.
@@seeekerman1342.The jury was made up of people from NYC and the Trump lawyers weren't allowed to cross examine her lawyers "witnesses," while Trump's lawyers also couldn't call witnesses that debunked her "witnesses." The trial was an example of a kangaroo court, and that decision will be thrown out on Trump's appeal.
@@seeekerman1342.Republican jury in NYC? LoL, what are you smoking?
@EywaDog.. The jury was not a " Republican" jury. AND they did not find him guilty of being a r. apist. Rather of saying. There IS a distinction.
@@sherrimcavoy8342don't bother feeding the troll
@@justmeinidaho777 are you under the impression that American juries don't have Republicans?
Tyrus once again spot on
So it’s the perfect example but she doesn’t know who is in it?
Typical
Tyrus nailed this topic perfectly!!!
What would you find if you looked at African art from the early 1500s, North American art from the early 1500s, South American art from the early 1500s, and Asian art from the early 1500s? People depicted in such art would look like the locals. You wouldn't find Africans in Aztec and Mayan art, or Asians in African art, or Europeans in Asian art. Clearly, 500 years ago, EVERYBODY was racist, and racist against people they didn't even know existed! SHOCKING!
it just shows they never understood diversity in the 1500s, no xenomorphs, no predators, non of the marvel superheroes, no aquaman, wonder woman or ET...... disapointing really, so set in their ways back then.
I was going to make a post saying the same thing. The Painting was what the artist knew. People in areas were of the same race and that’s was portrayed in their art. I haven’t seen any African art, but would it have any non-African people in it?
That’s a good point. Those were Barbaric times…
The child dressed up as a chief is adorable!
Good thing he's not a hockey fan from Ottawa! (Those guys call themselves the _Senators!_ and they're not even American!) 🤣
@@WXSEDYwow they have senators in Canada. America ain't the only one with senators
The Senators is a reference to ancient Rome
Yes, and his grandpa is an ACTUAL CHIEF! Native American Indian. He has kind of rights to his dress and face paint.
🤦♂️
"I don't know who that is, David or something" *pops gum and twirls hair*
This is what passes for an educated person?
_Cultured_ too! 🤣
... Yep! She's a pig alright. 🐷
The old wisdom was that education was not proof of intelligence or wisdom. Now, it's that a degree is not proof of knowledge or education.
We have a rapidly increasing number of people whose degrees aren't worth what it cost the college to print them.
An education title these days just means you spent $100,000 for a piece of paper.
@@edh_alters7116 It doesn't even mean that. At least not that you spent any of your own money. Student loans, y'know.
Attacking white people and Christianity in a single swoop. These race hustlers are getting more efficient.
I hope that families sues them into bankruptcy.
Having college degrees means nothing now.
Not true. It usually means that you're six figures in debt and making coffee.
These college grads are out of touch with the real world!!
@@joevette6290Educated Idiots😊
@@joevette6290they were out of touch when they were in High School LoL 🤣
Especially if you don't have the brains & common sense to go with the college degree. 😮
It's funny how the mainstream media is ignoring the Putin interview
You're shocked that the mainstream media is "ignoring" soft-ball, pro-Putin/Russia propaganda and misinformation from Tucker Carlson of all people? Seriously?
That said, the "MSM" isn't ignoring the interview at all, but they are quite critical of it, and rightfully so.
@@RAINRDYoh, you watched it?
If you wanna go suck bro off I mean you could fly there and stay there 🤷♂️
@debbydelaoach, That’s why they should send Joe’s border Czar over there on a shopping spree and give Mike Johnson the helm in Washington.
@@RAINRDYgrow up cry baby, it’s okay for journalists to speak with people you don’t agree with.
Wow is she ignorant!
I hope they sue the poop out of Dead Spin.
Doesn't the little Chief have 1st amendment protection? Good luck with the lawsuit. $1,000,000,000.00
When I was a kid my mom always made sure from a young age that skin color is no different than having different eye color or hair color my mom would have beat me to a pulp if ever said anything racist. I wonder what the average black mother said about other races.
I Agree
You don't wanna know
Good question And all white people don't like blks 😮
The average black mother said 'child, other races will bully you for your skin colour, know that I love you.'
Shocker. A white painter in white Europe painted white people
What if I just don't care if you think I'm racist. I won't be judged for being white and I don't care what haters think. I'm not racist but I'm not apologetic either.
Gutfeld is genius!
Hell yeah Tyrus! Preach it!
The Bible says that people would PAY others to “tickle their ears” which means TELL them what they WANT to HEAR!
They've been doing it for over 2000 years though, so it's not a new thing.
@@Joreel Yeah the Bible says a lot of things that were happening at the time, not really predictions.
Adam represents the creation of all mankind, and the Bible literally states that we are all related.
@@robertperry4439 That is true. Unfortunately we've become so divided that you wouldn't know it.
DeadSpin....how ironic will soon be DeadSpun.
"Justice is served, as it should be."
Kat, women weren't owned property. They were the _wards_ of their parents or their husbands.
This arrangement placed a set of rights and obligations on both parties. Married women, for instance, enjoyed the right to be financially supported by their husbands, dower rights, and rights of agency.
Dower rights: if the couple owned a home, the husband could not sell it without the wife's permission. She had a right to live in that home, and he was legally prohibited from selling it out from under her.
Rights of agency: this conferred the right to purchase necessaries like food, clothing and housewares on her husband's credit. She could pick out a bunch of stuff, tell the shopkeeper to put it on her husband's tab, and walk out with it. Incidentally, if the wife was overspending, the husband would have to go to each shop individually and notify the owners that he would no longer honor his wife's purchases. An ad in the local paper or a town crier announcement didn't hold water in court.
Wives also enjoyed immunity from marital debt. The husband was the administrator of the marital estate, so if the couple fell into catastrophic debt, HE was the one who'd be sent to debtor's prison.
Meanwhile, in the world of work, "sistren" have been recorded on the master rosters of various trade guilds going back to before the 1500s.
In terms of trades, women (often single women with no prospects of marriage) dominated weaving, baking and brewing, leading to the feminized surnames Brewster, Baxter and Webster, which are common even today (passed down to unmarried tradeswomen's sons). And of course, the term "spinster" referred to the work commonly done by unmarried women who had no parents or husband to support them.
That aside, women have been recorded as masters in ALL the trade guilds in Britain, including blacksmithing, going back to the 1400s and earlier. And women who married a tradesman had a cheat they could exploit. If he died, she could inherit his master status, hire journeymen and take on apprentices. It was _assumed_ that she had sufficiently learned the trade by being married to him and helping him run the business.
Unmarried women earned income and owned property in their own names. There was no law forbidding lenders from extending credit to unmarried women, though lenders could exercise their own discretion. Young women had a tougher time getting loans than middle aged widows, for sure.
Why? Because if that young woman subsequently got married, her husband would be the person responsible for repaying all her debts. Lenders kind of like to know who'll be on the hook for repayment so they can manage their risks.
Widows were a different matter. First, they'd have a history of managing credit (rights of agency). Most wives behaved responsibly with their husband's credit reputation because not doing so hurt the entire family. Widows were also more likely than never-married women to remain unmarried. And an unmarried woman COULD be held accountable for her own debts.
Marital coverture was a complex set of laws that bestowed rights, entitlements and responsibilities on both parties. But immunities? Those were for the wife alone.
As for being "owned" by your parents, that's called children's privilege. The right to be fed, clothed and sheltered by your parents and to live under their protection and care. Women retained it in adulthood. Men did not.
So the ancient figurines and masks that were used for religious purposes in Africa and always has Black physical features are somehow not racist?
"Looking down is hard." The man is priceless!
On the Biden verdict: some of these documents go back decades, to his time in the senate, was he elderly with poor memory then?? What utter idiocy, and Kat called it: them why is he considered competent to be president??
I wanna know why not a single lawyer in Indiana will take a case against this corruption and tyranny by the Department of Justice. Take my money. It's literally your job.
If they are allowed to pick and choose what cases they take, that isn't very "enshrined right" of them.
If people have a right to legal representation, their lawyer shouldn't be able to refuse a case.
And if a Lawyer can't refuse a case, then they can't be held accountable if they lose, because they had no choice.
Lawyers have a choice in who they represent, though, and chose to represent and win for people who are obviously guilty or who railroad people who are arguably innocent, or at least could be called "not guilty"
Lawyers either shouldn't be able to choose who they represent or they should lose their immunity.
@@SupHapCak YOUR RIGHTS COME FROM YOUR CREATOR PER YOUR CONSTITUTION. READ IT. THEY CANNOT BE TAKEN BY THE GOVERNMENT AND THE BILL OF RIGHTS STATES THE GOVERNMENT DOES NOT HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO MAKE A RIGHT A CRIME OR REQUIRE A FINE, FEE OR TAX. YOU DO NOT KNOW YOUR RIGHTS. DON'T GIVE ADVICE.
@@colevetter8970 Like they DID to TRUMP, on phony defamation case. HE DEFENDED HIMSELF. They call that, defamation! Carroll IS a Kook.
Sue!
Her credibility fell to zero when she didn't know about 'The Creation of Adam'😮
For the ultimate sillyness, Italians were not considered “white” till the 1950’s, which DiAngelo admitted to.
They’re white? C’mon man!?!
Would rennaissance era Italians even be fully aware of other races? People then lived and died, never leaving far from their birthplace.
Not considered "white" by who? Who told you that and why did you believe them?
@@_XR40_ I am something of an old fart (68), and my father reported on social attitudes from the 1930’s. He was not “white” either, at least to polite society. Grandpa was born in Oaxaca.
BTW, I did read White Fragility, and DiAngelo does acknowledge that history, despite discounting it to push her thesis.
In the 1929 play Strictly Dishonarable by Preston Sturges one of the characters explains that the other character can get away with something because he’s ’white’ but he can’t because he’s Italian.
Boy they sure are a lot of nuts falling out of the trees here lately
We wore Indian head dresses as kids in the 50's vs cowboys. When kids played outside in the fresh air.
Time to Bring Back THE WASHINGTON REDSKINS!!!
yes
Maybe if they call themselves the _Buck_ Skins? I mean, they're from _Washington D.C._ you know. 🤣
... Of course, there's always the name "Pirates," assuming Pittsburgh doesn't have a problem with it. (Probably a more appropriate name too.) 🏴☠
Yes. They were the Redskins for many, many years. Native Americans had no problem with the name for all those decades !
Agree!
Or the Israel no skins....?!?
It’s fascinating how this lady Robin Di-Angelo creates issues and problems where there are not any. All for greed and money. Thanks for calling her out! Don’t feel sorry for the ignorant fools who believe this nonsense.
she learned it from the great scientist of the gov that give us global warming 2 degrees will burn this place clear down and drowned us all by 1980
Since math was declared to be "racist" the term has lost all meaning.
Next thing you know, one of these geniuses is going to declare "alge _bra"_ to be sexist!
My favorite show!
@@Wolfkiller24 Not everyone's into "Bob the Builder" like you, infant.
Donald Trump should sue Joy Reid for Culturally Appropriating his Hair color and style.
The Friday show with Perino, Mackie &:Perez was lit. Never laughed so much with the "Leftovers".
Robin D'Angelo is a terrible person in my opinion, which I'm allowed to have. A person searching endlessly for ways to make everything racist. What a mundane existence. Sad.
Joe Biden isn't fit to run a bingo game
Wow! Nothing like being self important.
The judiciary is saving this country from itself. Never thought I'd say this, keep suing!!!
I have words but I am not allowed to utter them because UA-cam.....
Get rich kid you deserve it🎊🎉❣️
A lawsuit I support. It's probably the only way we curb this hate fueled scam.
Tulsi is so sensible and moderate. Would be a great VP. A uniter! ❤
The DEI team really needs to go after those Ancient cave paintings. Update them for the modern cave people audience. Like the ones in California.
Greg is so funny😊
No matter how wrong something is, if it’s profitable bad people will do it.
Awesome!
Good points!
Has anyone ever seen the symbol of a snake, lying in a circle, eating it's own tail? Ya, DEI....So sad.
Oroboros
I thought we had a civil war. Everyone speaks so well on Gutfeld. Bravo.
GREG WON'T FORGET THE HEART FALL OUT VAX. NEITHER SHOULD YOU.
Nice take on Haley from Tulsi. She walked the walk of the military. Thank you for your service.
She's painfull.
The funny thing about the fragility accusation is that if someone accusing you of being fragile stops you from pushing back then THAT is the only thing fragile. Poop on these people.
Change starts in the heart ❤️
Good for the parents
WHAT ABOUT SALT AN PEPPER ON OUR TABLE😳🤣🤣🤣🤣
Dam that racist salt! 😮
you can't call it salt and pepper but you can still think it to yourself just don't tell the school
Mr. Gutfeld. I just discovered your broadcasts, I'm a knew huge fan. Thank you sir for your content
You were on fire!
Greg you were on your game tonight, great show brother ❤!
They totally missed Tyrus's sisteen joke. You guy's are slipping!
I beg to differ...I actually believe that Tyrus thinks that Michelangelo painted the ceiling of the "Sixteen" chapel.😂
@user-eg3rt7ek6f if you have been paying attention to him at all you know he is not that shallow
How dare they ! Because you know , he is a GENIUS . The only one in the country.
To her own standards, Isn't Joy Reed appropriating white culture by wearing that wig?
Totally right SlowJoe is a mess 😢
Excellent👍
I hope Trump speaks at the Superbowl 😊
😂😂😂
Ugh, I hope not. Then I'd have to watch it and one of the most unbearable couples ever to afflict America.
Rapists aren't allowed.
@@talldavid30I know, Biden isn't going to the Superbowl...
@@onewayturtles Relax, dude - they're not filming you and your sister!
@4:28….. the quote St. Peter will play to her as she descends to hell
This is old news. Don’t you remember Rachel Dolezal? No discussion about race grifting can take place without the grandmother of it all.
Chaos creates cash that's why they all do it
she is in the frickin clouds . she had no idea what she was saying . NOR Did She behave it .
A fellow could make a fortune selling feathers in the Chief's parking lot during pre game.😉
Yeah Tyrus
Tyrus is a cool gent. In the 1500's Greg would know as much about slavery as Tyrus would perhaps more. Slavery of millions of Europeans by Barbary corsairs, Ottomans, Arabs.
Yep. The Left likes to conveniently ignore the Moors.
Yeah what Tyrus said!
Deadspin is done.
Never heard of Deadspin ... until now.
Well, unlike the Senator, he DOES HAVE native American ancestors 😅😂
He's Spot On!!!!
These race baiters have to be stopped.
They are Master baiters!
sue them into bankruptcy
Nice sweater Mr. Rogers:)
tyrus chiming in with "you all look alike" was the funniest thing i've heard all week...thanks tyrus
race baiters are like the elders in the movie The Village where "creatures are actually the elders disguised as the monsters to perpetuate the legend so they can scare and deter younger members from leaving"...
That sounds like a really _stupid_ movie. Thanks for the heads up.
@WXSEDY actually it wasn't bad. There was a reason for it. You may not like the film any way, but try it. Unusual ending.
Capitalizing on race!!!
The 15th century was absolutely great for women. Protected and cared for by their loving fathers in youth , protected and cared for by their loving husbands thru out their lives , protected and cared for by their respectful loving eldest son in their old age. And they did not have to expose themselves on Only Fans to come up with some money for survival. It is our age that is the worse age for women. Wake up Kat.
Oookaaay. Except for dying during childbirth, having no real rights, and pestilence. And no air conditioning, Or designer shoes.
That's great if you were a princess or lucky enough to be born into a rich man's home. Something tells me there weren't that many and may have had to do some rather disgusting things even if they were. So, imagine what it might have been like for a poor woman with no man in her life and no money as I'm sure there were a few of them also. Probably a few butt-ugly diseased ones too. It's not like there were very many laws that protected them from being treated like objects and sold into slavery by their own families (which absolutely happened and still happens in a countries like Somalia, Libya or North Korea).
@@mikeottersole Those poor women. It's a shame that only they had to deal with with pestilence and lack of air conditioning back then. Of course, your great-great-great-great-great-grandfather rocked those designer shoes.
Mike --- everyone back in those days had to deal with a different level of technology and medicine than we have now --- everyone --- wether male fo female. Most of the population lived an old fashion good active outdoor farming life tied to the land under the fuedal system in which they had to give a portion of their crops to the owner of the land , the fuedal lord every year -- a person they would actually know , talk with , and interact with. We still have fuedal lords here in this day as well ---- it is called the corporate CEO overlord . When was the last time you talked to the corporate CEO of the company you may work for ???? My guess is never. They at least could talk with their ""head"" boss directly and air the grievances --- us in this day and age --- not a chance. Do not fall into the trap that we have it ""better"" here in our age because of the babbles of technology , in a lot of ways , we have it worse -- much worse.@@mikeottersole
@@dner75-xh9le Apparently humour is wasted on you. Sorry, I refuse to romanticize the past. Things are so obviously better now, but of course could be better. We have huge problems. Your juvenile insults to my family history accomplish nothing.