I'm new to this, but I'm also curious. What would happen if you combine dual membrane planar with your corrugated wavy midrange design? Maby ultimate planar midrange driver, or it's just nonsense?
Mostly really hard to do , since all of the different thing you mention are harder then normal. Combining them really is no fun. I tried a curved weave design this week , but the traces are to small to cut in weave pattern. :(
And I'll still be watching, occasionally adding nerdy advice or ideas. I've even got my own giant stack of mylar, waiting for me to start doing my own planar experiments. 😆
Hi Joppe, How até You ? Não tenho sua experiência e nem conhecimento sobre projetos de planares e Ribbons e outros que o amigo tem, porém não seria mais sensato usar um diafragma com 120 graus de dispersão, creio que já seria altamente bom em se comparando com outras possibilidades, tô muito errado amigo ? Aqui do Brasil, somente imaginando tudo ok ! Good work and my besta regards !
Hi Doing fine thank you ! well i am not sure about what works best . i myself think less then 180 as well, maybe 160-170 reason is because then it would not have parts of the tweeter playing against each other. (if there is a part of the tweeter directly behind it, it might play against each other one being out of phase ) besides that... i think it might be whatever people like :) but i tend to go for less then 180 :) i might need to see where there is no or as little as possible tweeter part on the other side .
Well, I don’t think it’s a matter of taste, but of right or wrong. There are also people who like the sound of bose or other omnidirectional speakers. And yes 🙌 t could be impressive, but it is still wrong. When the lips of a singer gets 5 meter wide, then its impressive and you never heard anything like this, for sure because it’s just as wrong as it could be 😊
not really, a normal speaker (studio monitor) has a small as possible tweeter for the same reason , better dispersion . thats all there is to it. in my room with to much reflections i usually think its to... well all over the place :)
I'm new to this, but I'm also curious. What would happen if you combine dual membrane planar with your corrugated wavy midrange design? Maby ultimate planar midrange driver, or it's just nonsense?
Mostly really hard to do , since all of the different thing you mention are harder then normal. Combining them really is no fun. I tried a curved weave design this week , but the traces are to small to cut in weave pattern. :(
In 10 years from now this guy will still be cutting metal for promising prototypes! LOL
Hopefully, that would be great.
well its my hobby :) cutting metal hihi
And I'll still be watching, occasionally adding nerdy advice or ideas.
I've even got my own giant stack of mylar, waiting for me to start doing my own planar experiments. 😆
Haha , nice ! Go for it !
Hi Joppe, How até You ?
Não tenho sua experiência e nem conhecimento sobre projetos de planares e Ribbons e outros que o amigo tem, porém não seria mais sensato usar um diafragma com 120 graus de dispersão, creio que já seria altamente bom em se comparando com outras possibilidades, tô muito errado amigo ?
Aqui do Brasil, somente imaginando tudo ok !
Good work and my besta regards !
Hi Doing fine thank you ! well i am not sure about what works best . i myself think less then 180 as well, maybe 160-170 reason is because then it would not have parts of the tweeter playing against each other. (if there is a part of the tweeter directly behind it, it might play against each other one being out of phase ) besides that... i think it might be whatever people like :) but i tend to go for less then 180 :) i might need to see where there is no or as little as possible tweeter part on the other side .
Are you the surviving part of the famous TV series "OLSEN GANG" , from Denmark?
@@MARVELOUDIO i am not familiar with it , why ?
Well, I don’t think it’s a matter of taste, but of right or wrong.
There are also people who like the sound of bose or other omnidirectional speakers. And yes 🙌 t could be impressive, but it is still wrong. When the lips of a singer gets 5 meter wide, then its impressive and you never heard anything like this, for sure because it’s just as wrong as it could be 😊
not really, a normal speaker (studio monitor) has a small as possible tweeter for the same reason , better dispersion . thats all there is to it. in my room with to much reflections i usually think its to... well all over the place :)