Nikon D5100 vs. Canon T3i (600D): Comparison
Вставка
- Опубліковано 4 жов 2024
- Blog & Website: www.fenchel-jan...
First comparison between the new Nikon D5100 and the Canon EOS 600D (Rebel T3i). Shot with 25p at 1920x1080 in Frankfurt am Main.
NOTICE: Same settings on both cameras!
Lenses: Sigma 50mm f/1.4, Sigma 18-200mm
Music by Kevin MacLeod
www.incompetech...
I much prefer the colours of the 5100. More dynamic range, so it really pops after colour correction.
no matter how many comparison videos I watch, I just can't seem to decide!
You can achieve the look of the Canon with the Nikon D5100 in post production.. the contrast and everything.
Some pointers:
1. You have to record with both cameras at the same time.
2. You have to make sure you're using the same PICTURE STYLE, not only the same settings.
3. Lenses have contrast, color, CA (chromatic aberrations) and various other differences. If you're to use two different cameras, you have to make the comparison with the same lens. There are lots of nikon to canon mount adapters out there.
Want to do video? Get canon.
Want to do stills? That's just a matter of taste.
As far as I can see, the Canon 600d appears to add a little more contrast to the picture than the Nikon d5100 at the same settings
its really hard to tell but it looks like the colors pop just a tad on the canon but both look great
From a personal standpoint, I would recommend the Nikon if you want point-and-shoot video. Just because the record button works in all mode dials, compared to Canon where you have to switch the dial to video mode first before you shoot video. But if you're really into film-making, I would recommend Canon in a heartbeat, because you can change the iso and exposure without having to deal with automated features and the AE-Lock buttons. One of the reasons why I'm switching from my D5100 for a T3i.
@MrFilm3d It's called Anti-aliasing filter, Nikon added it to the new cameras because when an image is TOO sharp it's easier too look at the pixels, if you want a sharper image you can always sharp it in edition programs and add smoothness too.
Canon is a little bit aggressive with the contrast. I love Canon but.. Nikon win here.
Great comparison, trying to decide between the two. Thanks.
I agree with the fact that the 600D is a bit more sharper than the D5100 but other than that, they're probably the same.
hey mate. You can take great photos with say the canon 600D. Also you can record with fullHD 1080p. With full manual control over your focus,Aperture,zoom, ISO etc. Really awesome. You may have to pay quite alot of money to get a video camera with a sensor as high in quality as these cams. Also you can change the lenses out easily to suit your needs and there are heaps of attachments, LCD screen, Microphone, frames/mounts, mate boxes etc. You can monitor with earphones aswell. Hope this helps!!!
@lamme929 thanks, i'm still undecided on which body, overall, i do prefer good photography over video, anyway, it's great time for all of us that tools are readily available and we're only limited by our creativity.
Seems like Canon have a small edge; but Nikon is fine as well.
Alot of people is discussing about, which Canon 600D or Nikon d5100 is the best. If you don't know which to choose, go out to your local photography store, and try out both of them. You can't really see which is the best on UA-cam, because it's the matter what you like, not what somebody else likes.
Amo la Nikon!
Slightly sharper on the 600d. Thanks for the video comparison.
I agree. My decision is also purchasing the D5100. What better image.
It used to be taboo, but now sensors in DSLRs have become so good that they also do awesome video that you can use with your favorite lenses and camera settings to help really churn out a nice cinematic look. Handycams generally aren't as good for this but the really compact ones (like sports cams) can have their advantages over a good DSLR. If you are into both and are willing to learn - go DSLR with good video capabilities. My 2 cents.
@tbfenton1 I agree with your comment here, I went with Nikon basically because of the PHOTO abilities. While some say that the Canon is richer in color, I think the RAW format on both cameras produces the same quality thus post editing can create the tones you desire otherwise. I am new to Photography, this is just what some have told me in my researching
I probably thought this because since they say The Nikon D5100 doesnt have much manual control in movie mode, but thanks for correcting me.
Deeper shadows on the Canon, but the difference is so slight that it hardly matters. Is there a place to compare photos side-by-side?
@simoneim7 DLSR's are pretty standard video cameras these days. There are a billion other comparison videos that will talk all about the photo difference. I really appreciate the video focus.
@094ken
Oh, I think you are right. The specs seem to be better. I might seriously consider buying it. Thanks. :)
I'll give it to the Canon, colors look just a tad more vibrant... but is this a who's got more contrast kind of perspective?
@ferguido This is a good video, but it doesn't give the full picture. The MAJOR difference between the D5100 and the T3i is that you have full manual control of ISO, shutter speed and aperture with the T3i. You only have aperture control with the D5100. Thus, while these are shot at the same settings, you have a hell of a lot more control of those settings with a Canon. This is coming from a D5100 owner hoping for a firmware update that'll change this!
I just got the Canon 600D and it works GREAT!
Only thing the Nikon needs is a little bit of color correcting, very simple.. I have been stuck between getting the D5100 or 600D but i've made up my decision on getting the Nikon.. The image quality is better.
They're about identical except the D5100 has a bigger sensor and better low lighting (high ISO) image quality. It's closer to a 7D than a T3i. For video, the T3i has more manual settings, while the D5100 pretty much is all auto except you can hold the Lock button to lock exposure. The D5100 has auto focus during video, but it's not as good as a camcoder's so it's not really a selling point for me. I bought the D5100 for the picture quality and use a Sony camcorder for more demanding video.
Nice video ... Altough I always had a Nikon, I find the Canon a little bit better, because of a higher contrast without loosing the dynamic range ...
I am stuck in a rut... you see I almost don't like how crisp the t3i is because ive seen some video's where it looks the color contrast is boosted to much, where as the d5100 has that flat clean look.
sharpness, contrast, white balance etc. can easily be changed in either camera's settings :/ its a tough comparison
You're confusing sharpness for contrast. But as for sharpness itself thats really a test more suited for the lens, but both these videos were shot with 2 very different lenses... a normal prime, and a wide angle zoom.
I would say that the only thing that changes is contrast... Can you set it on the Nikon D5100? Because I prefer the Canon's contrast. Sharpness depends on the lens, doesn't it?
I also preferred the Canon. Current Amazon prices (3/25/2013) are almost identical for both kits (with 18-55 lens): $597 D5100 vs $579 T3i
YES! i think the t3i is slightly better looking. i just bought that camera thanks to your test videos. :D you guys rock!
@copech If you're anyway serious about video then you'll accept that. The autofocus on the Nikon is not great anyway and adds a noise to the video unless you dont mind covering that up with music. You can actually hold the autofocus (shutter) button on the Canon while recording though and it will focus for you (or so I'm told).
What do you mean by terrible? I'm using D5100 exclusively for almost 1.5 years now in all of my video production works, and it's extraordinary video machine for the small price. Watch the clip on my channel how to gain the manual control over the video feature.
very very close in my opinion but I thought the Canon looked a wee bit sharper in some of the details like grass and dirt. For video I don't think one could go wrong either way.
Great comparision video, but honestly, does anyone really think there is that much difference between these two video samples? Even blown up to full-screen on a decent monitor/tv you have to look closely to see any real difference in sharpness.
At normal viewing distances nobody would complain about either one of these - the quality is excellent, although a lot of credit has to go to the photographer for his skill in using the cameras!
Good video, thanks for uploading it.
I plan to buy Canon,but change the idea because of financial problem. Both the cameras are great,but guys see the price also.Canon is much costlier than Nikon(both the compared SLRs).My first choice was Canon,but for the price Nikon does its homework better. Designing,ease of use,pricing etc has speak louder here. Of course Canon is better here,images are sharper,speed is also better,ISO is also higher,that is undeniable,but pricing wise,I'd go for Nikon.
Very close in comparison... I say the Canon was crisper in some areas and then a tie in others. (like the portrait mode on the fence)
I looked into it...Nikon has the new weather control feature. It's set to windy by default.
Agreed. Same lens used on BOTH cameras would have been more objective.
the canon is a bit more clear but honestly its not a breathe taking difference the camera's are so similar that its up to you to make a good photo/video.
I like both of them,the 600D is sleightly better in video becauce of more manual control,but if you whant to take photo's then the D5100 is better because it has less noise and a bigger sensor.
The only difference is that Canons have more sharpening applied by default. Same refers to still imaging (where d5100 outperforms 600d IMHO).
The Canon does seem to have better contrast or focus or whatever that is, but Nikon's build in intervalometer with no need for a laptop does it for me.
I don't have an optical eye for video as much as I do photography, but it looked like it was a tie in some parts and in others one be the other.
I think there just happened to be more wind when recording with the Nikon than the Canon.
the canon doesn't look like it has more "detail" it just has more sharpness and contrast which I can easily add in or adjust to my liking with professional video editing software.
It really comes down to whether you want to shoot photos or videos. The Nikon trumps the cannon easy in the still department with its better kit lens, Higher dynamic range, and lower SnR, but it cant touch the canon in the video department with its full manual control and digital crop feature.
THANKS FOR THIS VIDEOS,IT HELP ME A LOT TO DECIDE,AT LONG LAST IT OPEN MY EYES. I END UP BUYING NIKON D5100. NIKON HAS SOMETHING WHICH IT CAN NOT SHARE WITH OTHER COMPETITORS-ITS VERSATILE OPERATIONS AND COLOR MANANGEMENT.THIS ARE THE THING I HAD BEEN SEARCHING SO LONG. GOOD VIDEO, THANKS GOD BLESS.
Never used the Nikon, but I have heard great things about it. I own a T3i (600D) and it has lot's of different manual controls for video which both good but can be confusing and take a bit to learn. I found the auto focus mode for video on the t3i was pretty poor with video ... but if cinematic is your thing manual is the only way to go anyway. Sorry no info on the Nikon, I think it has less manual controls for video than the t3i - you'll have to keep checking for info, that's about all I got =)
Looks like Nikon has more dynamic range (especially in shadows) and flatter and more neutral color profile (which is good for color grading). Canon looks slightly better straight out of the camera because the image is bit more contrasty.
nikon d5100 has a limit of 20mins (30minutes for canon 600d) or 4gb per video clip (whichever limit is reached first) regardless of resolution, frame rate, and memory card size.
@Jumina82 The nikon D5100 has 30fps at 1080p as well! ;)
i dun see much diff, except that the leaf is slightly greener on 600D
little bit more contrast and brighter colors on canon footage
@syton745 Yeah I noticed that too. Why wasn't it shot
simultaneously? Hmmm....
@simoneim7 Because Alot of filmakers are using the DSLR's for film making now. There are other video's that show you still photos. So go find them.
But think about this, with the Nikon, if i am correct, you can not Do manual focus while in movie mode, so whats the point?
@Gabsterboy I think canon still over nikon d5100, but a lot of people dont want accept it!!!
I don't like how people are comparing these two cameras and favoring the Canon T3i because of its video capability. These are DSLR cameras. They are meant for photography. If I cared about video, I'd be getting a camcorder.
@onespokesdude I have both camera,Nikon d5100 and t3i, nikon is more sharper, who made this video work for canon!!!
I disagree... I think neither is sharper.. the Canon is slightly higher contrast and perhaps has more edge enhancement.... but I don't think it's any sharper. As far as something to edit with.. I would pick the Nikon because there is more detail in the shadows and less edge enhancement. Now the question is.. which one is easier to use? Which one can change aperture while recording while mainting the same 1/48the shutter?
I can see that the Canon photos are sharper and clearer, by a little bit. You have to play it many times to really be sure.
the only real diff i see is the T has slightly better contrast though that can be done to both post pro.
I though that the vs for The Nikon D5100 was the Canon 550D, not the 600D.
Unfortunately, they were meant to be Mirror-cameras. Did you know you can only record 15 minute videos on a 600D? After that, your camera might get damaged. Exactly, that's what I thought!
I mean like...you DO realize that wind just does its own thing, right? That when he shot it, it was just windy.
Can you please indicate which lens you used for which camera? Why not use a nikon lens for the nikon camera and a canon lens for the canon camera (same if not similar specs, of course)? Because the differences in IQ may be due to the lens used... just my thoughts...
awesome! its really hard to tell the difference...
@tycusX hmm many people own DSLRs these days to take really high quality videos.
I own a canon 600D and I can say that it's video quality can easily outmatch many video cameras, especially in low light situations. Apart from that, with the amount of lenses that DSLRs have, it is much easier to get more artistic shots etc.
@copech true. But it has more frame choices, Both full HD are 30 max, but it has 60 for HD ready, Nikon doesn't have 30, Not a big deal I think If you not into movie making for editing.
@TheWhysoweird But Nikon has larger sensor, so it gets more light.
Your "video by" and "music by" would have been better if it was top or bottom, instead of covering the majority of the left image.
You never know what picture settings it was on though. I think the t3i would be far better because of cinestyle and magic lantern.
@Dagamster2345 As a jogger you don't want to stand still for a traffic light, so you keep moving. The pole is not in front of him but to the side, you can't really tell the depth.
The headline should say "video" in it somewhere.
why does it seem like it's windier in the nikon video over the canon
stop fighting both look excellent and besides nikon cameras always like to keep images a little soft. It's a personal preference
dxomark.com rates Nikon D5100 at 80 rating and Canon T3i at 60 ratings. The contrast and colors on this video can be adjusted on the camera, so this video means little other than that its default settings. Canon always look more Video-like and Nikon more natural Film-quality with Sony sensors, but it's all about the lens, so I prefer Nikon lens and Sony sensor over Canon Lens and its own in-house sensor.
you compare how they render flesh tones... live models mixed with architectural please...
Canon has a 'video feel' but Nikon preserves the original colors.
I prefer Nikon.
No doubt about it, the T3i has more resolution. Heck, I got the D5100, with a resolution of 2490, the T3i has a resolution of 2550. A difference of only 60. I prefer the Nikon, though & now have 4 Nikon Lenses + the 8mm Bell & Howell Fish-eye(entirely manal). It is the same lens as the 8mm Pro-optic, I think!. I have the 85mm Micro as well. I've been into Fish-Eye for about 4 years. I love the surreal effect. And Bokeh is a new love! I'm not into video. A retired Catholic priest. Thanks.
until you need to auto-focus while filming ;) Still is a dilemna to choose which one ill buy !!
@thkkud you obviously don't know what you're talking about. video at the same resolution, is going to have the same physical resolution no matter how many megapixels the sensor is for taking photos.
i thought that they were both bretty good so can someone tell me which one ?
but what could be better in PHOTOGRAFY?!! Iike you say! I like the 600d contrast but is the same in photography?! please help me cause Im debating wich to buy a: d5100 or 600dt3i
I'm sorry, but how can anyone be so definite of which one is better!?
can somebody tell me WHERE is the difference? why some people say that CANON is better? even If I pause the video.. I see the same..
@Victorayde well the only times I use AF is when I have an angle where I cannot see through the viewfinder correctly such as wehn I lay on the drive trying to frame the shot, and there just wasn't enough light to be sure of a good focus (car headlights a bit back) so used AF with flash illumination :) and i don't really do video shooting a lot :)
I shoot Nikon and I love the photos it produces. Perfect in so many ways. However I always get frustrated when it comes to video. For example last Sunday I was photographing a convention, took a couple hundred photos and filmed one interview as well as one song the band played. After importing the photos looked great! However the video needed some post production work. I use Final Cut so it didn't take long to fix the video. But it's still frustrating. BTW I'm still a Nikon fanboy :P
It's really hard to tell. Most of the time you won't notice the difference, I would have not noticed the difference if i were not seriously paying attention to which is better. But Canon looks sharper
@TheSisterPrincess
Canon i sharper, and has a more realistic(and better looking) saturation and contrast. Not to mention the 60 f/ps we have in 720p, and the 30 f/ps we have in 1080p. this video had both cameras on 25f/ps.
Both camera is wanderfull, is depent what suit u on d setting site.
600D does produce crispier and clearer video but you gotta see it carefully....
@Geoffboyardee i'm a nikon biased owner and i agree, but this is only in terms of video quality, except when it comes to picture quality, nikon definitely wins...but i am proud of canon making quality products...
I want see test betwenn d5100 and d7000, please, do it that