The Gary Kasparov look-alike is Victor Plotkin, the coach of the Canadian team :) After 40 moves are played, players get 30 additional minutes. The clocks, however, work with players pressing a button after a move is played. The organisers decided not to tune the clocks to add 30 minutes after 40 presses cos accidental presses could result in additional 30 minutes being available before the 40th move. As the deputy chief arbiter explains, there are a lot of games with relatively less experienced players playing. Therefore, the clocks are tuned to automatically add 30 minutes when the clock hits zero. Players are required to write their moves on a sheet and therefore can keep track of the number of moves played. For Eric Hansen’s 40th move, he ran out of time, that is clock hit 0:00 and 30 minutes was added. He took 2 more seconds and then played the 40th move when the clock read 29:58. Players get 30 seconds increment for every move and therefore the clock now shows 30:28 for Eric Hansen in the video. As he made the 40th move after the clock hit zero, Eric lost on time. The players wanted to be sure of this and therefore the deputy chief arbiter entered the scene and confirmed the same.
Its very simple, as the clock time runs out of 30 mins, and the person has not made his 40th move, the whole table should vibrate and the player is instantly drenched in water. No confusion then.....
Explanation - Whenever the clock hits 0 for any player, then the clock itself adds an additional 30 min to the time of the player, as after 40 moves are played, the players get an additional 30 min to play the game. In this case, Eric Hansen was on his 40th move (therefore 40 move threshold not passed and 30 min wouldn't be provided till yet) and his timer hit 0(thus he lost on time) so the clock itself added 30 min to his time, then 2 seconds after this hansen played his move and due to the 30 sec increment on each move his time showed as 30:28 (29:58+0:30). Eric was just trying to confirm if he lost on time as his clock still showed the given time left.
After 40 moves, the time control is reached, and we will get additional time. But the arbiters claim that while making the 40th move, Eric's time ran out and was 0:00 for 2-3 seconds before getting extra time, so he lost on time. Anish in support of Eric is confirming whether it really happened or not.
In a decisive team match a few months ago I had a winning position, I had played my 40th move (White) and pressed the clock, and so I thought that the 30 minutes would be added once my clock went down to 0:00. My opponent played his 40th move, pressed the clock, and I started thinking. To my horror the clock did not add the 30 minutes, instead was stuck at 0:00! Fortunately the arbiter quickly verified that I had reached time control and told me that the clock had not been functioning properly. I thankfully went on to win the game without any more disturbances, and therefore helped the team qualify for the higher division. So, kind of the opposite as what happened in Giri-Hansen :)
No such thing as a "former GM"... once a GM, always a GM! (Or can the grandmaster title be taken away if there is controversy around it and exceptional circumstances like cheating?)
@@stefan4159 Indeed cheating can result in the GM title being stripped - Igors Rausis is probably the most recent example of such. But in general you're right, I doubt anyone there is a "former GM."
@@steakanator7236 it’s quite ironic really a GM friend of mine told me about a year ago that Rausis was the only player of our generation whose rating had actually gone up(I’m 59 now) and then we find the reason why - it’s actually quite sad.😭
This is what happened: Eric Hansen lost on time. The timer starts again after 0:00 after move 40 and so the time started again and Eric pressed at 29:58 ie 2 sec after 0 minutes so timer showed 30:28
@@elixir662 After 40 moves automatically 30 mins got added. For eg : They were given 90 mins for first 40 moves. If let's say anish here plays his 40th move at 85th min. Then after his left over 5mins goes to 0:00. He will get 30 more mins automatically. Overall 35 mins he got. So in this case Eric played his 40th move at 90.2 min. As at 0.00, automatically time increased to 30:00 mins. So if he had played before 90th min then clock must have shown 30.31 or more than that i.e 30.32 and so on.. As there is 30 sec increment. But actually it is showing 30.28, i. e 2 sec less, so he lost.. Hope u get this..
For those asking what had happened - The clocks here are setup in a way that once the timer reaches 0, it assumes that second time control has started and 30 mins are automatically added to it. As per the rules the second time control starts after 40 moves are completed. In this case, when Eric was playing his 40th move, his time ran out and then 30 mins got added to his clock. So when he pressed his clock after the 40th move it was showing as 30:28 (30 min of 2nd time control + 30 sec inc - 2 sec taken to make the move). But his time should have been more than 30:30 just after the 40th move. That's why it's a flag.
@@DMSportsWorld bro,as many games are most likely simultaneously happening, they can't manually add 30 mins. extra to all the player.So,they automated it
I recently played the Biel Chess Festival. It was a move counter. The player next to me accidentally pressed my clock. During the whole game I was kind of worried if there will be a clock issue after 40 moves. Fortunately I won my game in 20 moves XD
3:10 Eric said there is no camera. Both parties are not in fault here. 1) a sport should have cameras to check such anomalies. for example if a player touches a piece and plays another and refuses to admit that he touched it, what will be the proof. 2) Nearly 185 countries are participating in this olympiad, which will be a huge number of games simultaneously, so setting up that many cameras is not feasible. Not just the cost of equipment but also the space required (you can see the difference between Indian boards space and other boards space) . And classical matches can't be played one by one, then it will take forever.
Cameras will not always be clear whether you actually touched the piece. You can always argue for more controls. Fortunately, chess is still a gentle(wo)men's sport, mostly. Same here, I don't think the facts were debated, only the interpretation under the rules.
If you will look at the pre match clips, you will notice cameras set up near every team. The camera covers almost every board and so you can easily notice such mistakes or cheating.
@@landsgevaer Yes but still the first argument is always "Check the cameras" It happens always in chess. In Tata steel 2019 Anish Giri said the same to chief arbiter. And it is very common
@@zuko2511 how is that camera supposed to show the clock situation of Eric? I have given the time stamp at which eric said there was no cameras to prove that he hit the clock before flag down
Since the time is also being conveyed digitally to computers they can have a software clock running on a server, which can be referred to for arbitration. This confusion occured only because the local clock did not halt on reached zero; it automatically added 30 minutes although the 40th move was still incomplete.
Those who didn't understand, what is clear indication of flag down. See at 7:06 at eric's side you can see flag at top corner. It indicates that he lost on time. That's why anish came to know about it in first place . Sometimes player keeps playing and dont see clock and both players time turns 0 . In thay case also this flag is indicative of who lost on time
Well done to the arbiter, who conducted the situation very professionally and calmly. The players also handled the situation in an orderly fashion. That’s a change from OTB unclear / controversial situations. 😅
The time ran to zero even as he was in the process of completing the 40th move. Unfortunately the clock is dumb and added 30 mins anyway. But by looking at the final time and backtracking on what could have happened they figured out he made the move 2 seconds after it was supposed to be zero.
Anish shouldn't have started speaking Hindi. It's rude to start speaking another language when there's other people who are part of the conversation... especially in the middle of a dispute.
The Time Control of Chess Olympiad is 90 minutes in first 40 moves, then additional 30 minutes to finish the game after 40 moves with 30 seconds increments starting move 1 He/She must reach move 40 before the time is running out, if He/She didn’t reach move 40 within time, He/She Lost on time
This all could be avoided if the clocks were programmed properly. If someone flags on the first time control, it should stay at 0:00 and not move on to the next time control along with the increment.
It's not possible there will be unrecorded time gap between 40th and 41st move and again arbiters can't come and add 30mins to all the clocks in the hall. It's now done correctly end of 40th move if any player has less than 30:30 on his clock he lost on time that's all simple.
@@medp2493 but if clock hits zero at or before the 40th move, there is no issue of gap between 40th and 41st move. Like I pressed the clock for the 40th time and it was equal to zero, then it should remain equal to zero. If that's not the case, time should be added as it's happening now
@@AshutoshSingh-qj1gm As the arbiter explained there are more cases of people pressing even if they haven't moved, so that is why no move control is added here. Let us assume a player does not move and presses the timer, what wil happen then, arbiter will be called. This is not what we want. It is an Olympiad even players with 1400 are playing here from 186 countries. I won't say this is a very rare case, but it has less probability of happening again and again. So I think this is the best way to go forward
@@janukickass pressing without moving, is it an olympiad or a under 10 inter school event. I am amazed by this revelation. I guess chess players at the highest level also do make these kind of mistakes
I did NOT understand. He said whenever the clock downs to 00:00 the player will get 30 more minutes. So, why Eric lose on time if he was supposed to get more 30 minutes? very confuse explanation.
Player gets 30 min after 40 moves. If they couldn't complete 40 moves under the 1st time control of 90 minutes they lose on time. So in this clock settings 30 minutes starts automatically after the end of previous 90 mins. What happened is the last move that Eric made was his 40th move but he couldn't make it under 1st 90 min. It was made in 2nd time control so he actually lost on time. I hope it's clear now.
Eric lost because he played the 40th move 2 sec after the counter was reset by 30 mins. Hence the clock is showing 29:58. He can only play move 41 onwards once it is reset.
Serious question: I understand rules are rules and there are things on the line (prize money, rating, etc.), but for a mere 2-3 seconds would you yourself call the arbiter and claim victory? Would winning, losing, or drawish position change your response?
I understood the situation from all the explanations. However who noticed the anomaly? Was it Giri, was it the Arbiter? Is there a physical cue that alerts the arbiter that something is amiss?
Not a fan of this setting. It requires more arbiter involvement than necessary. It's more likely for people to lose on time before 40 moves than it is for people to multi press the clock. The 30 minutes after 40 moves setting is far simpler and less prone to error imo.
More likely yes, but atleast with watching arbiters they can check that. Can you imagine the chaos we would have if unrated players blindly double tapped the clocks, since there is no camera? All results would have to be abandoned
@@PratLegacy -Not really, they're playing on DGT Boards, it's easy to confirm the number of moves made (which is what is being done now anyway). Beginners don't tend to press the clock multiple times but rather forget to press it periodically.This could impact them negatively by having time added a move or two later potentially but this would be entirely their fault, on the other hand,in this system the onus is on the opponent to observe and even make a claim about time being added before 40 moves which can also be a challenge given how beginners tend not to keep note accurately.They're both reasonable options but I lean more towards the other setting.
Player gets 30 min after 40 moves. If they couldn't complete 40 moves under the 1st time control of 90 minutes they lose on time. So in this clock settings 30 minutes starts automatically after the end of previous 90 mins. What happened is the last move that Eric made was his 40th move but he couldn't make it under 1st 90 min. It was made in 2nd time control so he actually lost on time. I hope it's clear now.
I didn't understand how the clock handles the fact that the 40th move is over? What happens when the players complete 40 moves? Who adds the time to the clock, as the clock has no counter and no way of knowing when 40 moves have been completed. I understand that when the time reaches 0, 30 minutes is added but nobody completes 40 moves with his clock down to exact zero seconds. Do the arbiters intervene and add the time?
The counter that he mentions is not the chess move counter but simply how many times the clock is pressed. So that's why the arbiter mentioned that it has certain disadvantages.
They need to upgrade the clock, whatever i understand if Clock time reached to 00:00:00 then why clock add more time on it. time can only add when Atleast 1 second left
The arbiter explained it very clearly. Plus the fact that only 28 seconds was added instead of 30 seconds was clear proof that the flag had fallen and Hansen was 2 secinds short. The conversation with the players shouldn't have needed to last that long.
If Eric flagged, why did Anish keep playing? The play was eratic on both sides after the alleged flag. Like, blunder city. Is there a video of this where we can see what actually happened? I'd like to hear Eric speak on this as he has no difficult accent. Are the clocks there cheap crap? My chess clock tells me if I flag. How did this happen?
I have a question, the deputy chief arbitrer mentioned that the additional 30mins are added after the time reaches 0:00. Lets say if 40 moves are played with 5 mins time remaining, how will the second time control time be added?? Is it gonna be added only after 0:00 or will the arbitrer need to interfere and add the additional time?
In this case, If 40 moves are already played, then only after clock hitting 0:00 the time control will be added. So that you can have the rest of the time and additional time. There are also clocks which work other way. (That's the question at the end)
Someone like Eric is not "inexperienced" and should know better and show a modicum of humility. The clock isn't there as a "suggestion", it's part of the game. I'm kind of not surprised these antics are coming from someone who goes by the pompas handle "chessbrah" on YT.
Back in my day 20 years ago when I was still a professional player only the player or the arbiter could point out when someone had won on time. However it’s quite possible that the rules have changed since then.
Opponent ne flag kr diya h bhai flag means usne jo time diya tha uske andar apko chal chlna tha apke moves jyda ho gye hai watch time me yahi show ho rha h waise in log watch kharab ho gya h krke bol rhe h sayad.....
That guy next to the arbiter sure looks like Garry Kasparov's twin who got lost in Kumbh Mela.........hope Garry sees this and reunites with him......like RameshSuresh...😀
What is the confusion all about ? Eric didn't make his 40th move within the 1st time control. He was 2 seconds late. He lost on time. There is absolutely nothing wrong with the clock and Eric knows it very well then why make such a big deal out of it ? He should have just shook hands with Anish and moved on. His position was anyways lost.
What a joke. Why do they even play with increments. These are pro players. Fischer claimed computers ruined the sport, but He did! Hard to take the olympiad seriously between this and all the dubious draws.
The Gary Kasparov look-alike is Victor Plotkin, the coach of the Canadian team :)
After 40 moves are played, players get 30 additional minutes. The clocks, however, work with players pressing a button after a move is played. The organisers decided not to tune the clocks to add 30 minutes after 40 presses cos accidental presses could result in additional 30 minutes being available before the 40th move. As the deputy chief arbiter explains, there are a lot of games with relatively less experienced players playing.
Therefore, the clocks are tuned to automatically add 30 minutes when the clock hits zero. Players are required to write their moves on a sheet and therefore can keep track of the number of moves played. For Eric Hansen’s 40th move, he ran out of time, that is clock hit 0:00 and 30 minutes was added. He took 2 more seconds and then played the 40th move when the clock read 29:58. Players get 30 seconds increment for every move and therefore the clock now shows 30:28 for Eric Hansen in the video. As he made the 40th move after the clock hit zero, Eric lost on time.
The players wanted to be sure of this and therefore the deputy chief arbiter entered the scene and confirmed the same.
even I mistook him as Kasparov at first glance😅
Thanks for explaining Vignesh. I had no idea what was going on
Humshakals 😂🔥
@@sebastiangonzalezgonzalez2183 Thanks...
Thanks a lot!👍
Its very simple, as the clock time runs out of 30 mins, and the person has not made his 40th move, the whole table should vibrate and the player is instantly drenched in water. No confusion then.....
Yup 🤓
Eric lost on time on 40 th move... He was 2 sec slow...
Completely agreed 😂
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣❤️
Explanation - Whenever the clock hits 0 for any player, then the clock itself adds an additional 30 min to the time of the player, as after 40 moves are played, the players get an additional 30 min to play the game. In this case, Eric Hansen was on his 40th move (therefore 40 move threshold not passed and 30 min wouldn't be provided till yet) and his timer hit 0(thus he lost on time) so the clock itself added 30 min to his time, then 2 seconds after this hansen played his move and due to the 30 sec increment on each move his time showed as 30:28 (29:58+0:30). Eric was just trying to confirm if he lost on time as his clock still showed the given time left.
It's 2 second**
@@mugunthangunasekaran3326 where?
@@mugunthangunasekaran3326 It 30 mins added after 00:00
@@zipzingg i mean 2 second made controversial
@@mugunthangunasekaran3326 ah okay my bad
After 40 moves, the time control is reached, and we will get additional time. But the arbiters claim that while making the 40th move, Eric's time ran out and was 0:00 for 2-3 seconds before getting extra time, so he lost on time. Anish in support of Eric is confirming whether it really happened or not.
Good sport of Anish then
@@YorkyPoo_UAV He was winning anyways, it was basicaly already over
@@gujikujtutu2330 Anish was definitely winning but if you lose you want it to be for the reason you lost. But even so... Super GM's can still blunder.
I like how Anish is fighting on behalf of Eric Hansen... Respect...
In a decisive team match a few months ago I had a winning position, I had played my 40th move (White) and pressed the clock, and so I thought that the 30 minutes would be added once my clock went down to 0:00. My opponent played his 40th move, pressed the clock, and I started thinking. To my horror the clock did not add the 30 minutes, instead was stuck at 0:00! Fortunately the arbiter quickly verified that I had reached time control and told me that the clock had not been functioning properly. I thankfully went on to win the game without any more disturbances, and therefore helped the team qualify for the higher division. So, kind of the opposite as what happened in Giri-Hansen :)
there always has to be some controversy when our boy Anish plays😂
He staged the whole thing for Twitter special operation
What the hell is Garry Kasparov doing there?
🤣🏆🔥
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Elder brother of Garry Canada captain
Humshakal 😂
Gary can pretty much go where ever he wants.
This is a chess lovers paradise .. All former and current GMs under one roof ❤️
No such thing as a "former GM"... once a GM, always a GM! (Or can the grandmaster title be taken away if there is controversy around it and exceptional circumstances like cheating?)
@@stefan4159 Indeed cheating can result in the GM title being stripped - Igors Rausis is probably the most recent example of such. But in general you're right, I doubt anyone there is a "former GM."
GM can be better understood in the sense of an academic degree like Ph.D. You never say "former Dr...."
@@steakanator7236 it’s quite ironic really a GM friend of mine told me about a year ago that Rausis was the only player of our generation whose rating had actually gone up(I’m 59 now) and then we find the reason why - it’s actually quite sad.😭
This is what happened: Eric Hansen lost on time. The timer starts again after 0:00 after move 40 and so the time started again and Eric pressed at 29:58 ie 2 sec after 0 minutes so timer showed 30:28
So who won ?
@@lordwiz6653 Anish
Bhai mujhe abhi bhi nahi samjh aya.
@@elixir662 After 40 moves automatically 30 mins got added. For eg : They were given 90 mins for first 40 moves. If let's say anish here plays his 40th move at 85th min. Then after his left over 5mins goes to 0:00. He will get 30 more mins automatically. Overall 35 mins he got.
So in this case Eric played his 40th move at 90.2 min. As at 0.00, automatically time increased to 30:00 mins. So if he had played before 90th min then clock must have shown 30.31 or more than that i.e 30.32 and so on.. As there is 30 sec increment. But actually it is showing 30.28, i. e 2 sec less, so he lost..
Hope u get this..
@@pranshukhandelwal8132 Bhai teacher ban jaa. Perfectly explained. Thanks
For those asking what had happened - The clocks here are setup in a way that once the timer reaches 0, it assumes that second time control has started and 30 mins are automatically added to it. As per the rules the second time control starts after 40 moves are completed. In this case, when Eric was playing his 40th move, his time ran out and then 30 mins got added to his clock. So when he pressed his clock after the 40th move it was showing as 30:28 (30 min of 2nd time control + 30 sec inc - 2 sec taken to make the move). But his time should have been more than 30:30 just after the 40th move. That's why it's a flag.
I don't understand why there was any move played after Eric flagged.
then they need to upgrade clock, if clock reached 00:00:00 then how it's adding any time after time out
@@DMSportsWorld after 0, time will again start from 00:29:59
@@DMSportsWorld That's a normal setting. You don't get all game time at the start, but in stages.
@@DMSportsWorld bro,as many games are most likely simultaneously happening, they can't manually add 30 mins. extra to all the player.So,they automated it
Didn't expect people would ignore Garry Kasparov like he is being ignored here..lol ;)
that's not Kasparov
@Kaustav r/wooosh
he is not Garry Kasparov. open your eyes 🙄
That's Kasparov's distant relative... Kary Gasparov 😜
🤣🤣🤣 doppleganger tha uska
I recently played the Biel Chess Festival. It was a move counter. The player next to me accidentally pressed my clock. During the whole game I was kind of worried if there will be a clock issue after 40 moves. Fortunately I won my game in 20 moves XD
Liar
Too good
Muito bem explicado! Felizmente ambos os jogadores se comportaram cordialmente e com sensatez aguardando explicações do árbitro.
3:10 Eric said there is no camera.
Both parties are not in fault here.
1) a sport should have cameras to check such anomalies. for example if a player touches a piece and plays another and refuses to admit that he touched it, what will be the proof.
2) Nearly 185 countries are participating in this olympiad, which will be a huge number of games simultaneously, so setting up that many cameras is not feasible. Not just the cost of equipment but also the space required (you can see the difference between Indian boards space and other boards space) . And classical matches can't be played one by one, then it will take forever.
Cameras will not always be clear whether you actually touched the piece.
You can always argue for more controls. Fortunately, chess is still a gentle(wo)men's sport, mostly.
Same here, I don't think the facts were debated, only the interpretation under the rules.
If you will look at the pre match clips, you will notice cameras set up near every team. The camera covers almost every board and so you can easily notice such mistakes or cheating.
They should put cameras on top of boards attached to ceiling
@@landsgevaer Yes but still the first argument is always "Check the cameras" It happens always in chess. In Tata steel 2019 Anish Giri said the same to chief arbiter.
And it is very common
@@zuko2511 how is that camera supposed to show the clock situation of Eric?
I have given the time stamp at which eric said there was no cameras to prove that he hit the clock before flag down
Great explanation by the arbiter.
Great coverage and interview! Thanks!
Since the time is also being conveyed digitally to computers they can have a software clock running on a server, which can be referred to for arbitration. This confusion occured only because the local clock did not halt on reached zero; it automatically added 30 minutes although the 40th move was still incomplete.
Didn't know Kasparov was a captain
He isn't.
0:48 Harry Potter checking the situation behind Eric Hansen
Explanation at 7:43
Those who didn't understand, what is clear indication of flag down. See at 7:06 at eric's side you can see flag at top corner. It indicates that he lost on time. That's why anish came to know about it in first place .
Sometimes player keeps playing and dont see clock and both players time turns 0 . In thay case also this flag is indicative of who lost on time
Sagar ji... this clarification is a much needed one... no one will comment over this... 👌
watch the full video to know what happened.
Okk dear 😘
You looking gorgeous 😍 ❤ 💕
@@artifitialintelignce081 nice try👍
8:00 Real discussion starts
down to Earth Garry Kasparov trying to clear the confusion 0:55
I have seen the arbiter before on this channel. Explaining GM and IM norms :)
Well done to the arbiter, who conducted the situation very professionally and calmly. The players also handled the situation in an orderly fashion. That’s a change from OTB unclear / controversial situations. 😅
I like how Garry Kasparov wants to know about the 📸 on clocks 😃😃
Chief arbiter looks like IAS Drishti 😂😂
So tell me about yourself
😂😂😂😂 so true. Lol
Lost on time. That is fine. Happens. Giri wanted to keep playing though. He doesnt care as this is basic sportsmanship but rules are rules.
What a question by Sagar sir!! 🙏🏼🙏🏼
I must be so stupid. After 12 minutes of watching the entire video I am still confused. :(
The time ran to zero even as he was in the process of completing the 40th move. Unfortunately the clock is dumb and added 30 mins anyway. But by looking at the final time and backtracking on what could have happened they figured out he made the move 2 seconds after it was supposed to be zero.
Anish shouldn't have started speaking Hindi.
It's rude to start speaking another language when there's other people who are part of the conversation... especially in the middle of a dispute.
Way he is whispering is fukin hilarious 😂 🤣 😂
The Time Control of Chess Olympiad is 90 minutes in first 40 moves, then additional 30 minutes to finish the game after 40 moves with 30 seconds increments starting move 1
He/She must reach move 40 before the time is running out, if He/She didn’t reach move 40 within time, He/She Lost on time
This all could be avoided if the clocks were programmed properly. If someone flags on the first time control, it should stay at 0:00 and not move on to the next time control along with the increment.
It's not possible there will be unrecorded time gap between 40th and 41st move and again arbiters can't come and add 30mins to all the clocks in the hall.
It's now done correctly end of 40th move if any player has less than 30:30 on his clock he lost on time that's all simple.
@@medp2493 but if clock hits zero at or before the 40th move, there is no issue of gap between 40th and 41st move. Like I pressed the clock for the 40th time and it was equal to zero, then it should remain equal to zero. If that's not the case, time should be added as it's happening now
@@AshutoshSingh-qj1gm As the arbiter explained there are more cases of people pressing even if they haven't moved, so that is why no move control is added here.
Let us assume a player does not move and presses the timer, what wil happen then, arbiter will be called. This is not what we want.
It is an Olympiad even players with 1400 are playing here from 186 countries.
I won't say this is a very rare case, but it has less probability of happening again and again.
So I think this is the best way to go forward
@@janukickass pressing without moving, is it an olympiad or a under 10 inter school event. I am amazed by this revelation. I guess chess players at the highest level also do make these kind of mistakes
The arbiter clearly explained why they didn't prefer this mode over the mode which was used.
Can he tell about the Norway Mongolia controversy?? Wrong move repetition issue?
Turning on the subtitles doesn't work guys😂
just read the discription jisko samjh na aaya
aww man too bad, big fan of Eric. too bad this had happened to him, of all the players
He was still losing though and his team also lost independent of his result
@@tanujmehta7155 at least it was not a deciding game then
Well explained
I did NOT understand. He said whenever the clock downs to 00:00 the player will get 30 more minutes. So, why Eric lose on time if he was supposed to get more 30 minutes? very confuse explanation.
See description
Player gets 30 min after 40 moves. If they couldn't complete 40 moves under the 1st time control of 90 minutes they lose on time.
So in this clock settings 30 minutes starts automatically after the end of previous 90 mins.
What happened is the last move that Eric made was his 40th move but he couldn't make it under 1st 90 min. It was made in 2nd time control so he actually lost on time.
I hope it's clear now.
Eric lost because he played the 40th move 2 sec after the counter was reset by 30 mins. Hence the clock is showing 29:58. He can only play move 41 onwards once it is reset.
my only question, how can clock add time if its completed the time, clock need to program like that if 00:00:00 reached then clock remain on it
@@DMSportsWorld Watch the complete video. The arbiter has explained the very same thing
AG takes deathmatch too seriously I guess.... 😂😂... Anyways great to see anish in some real action 😅😅
Wow that's a lot of thinking about clocks
Serious question: I understand rules are rules and there are things on the line (prize money, rating, etc.), but for a mere 2-3 seconds would you yourself call the arbiter and claim victory? Would winning, losing, or drawish position change your response?
I understood the situation from all the explanations. However who noticed the anomaly? Was it Giri, was it the Arbiter? Is there a physical cue that alerts the arbiter that something is amiss?
anish dont believe anyone 😂
I didn't know Kasparov is the team captain LOL
Not a fan of this setting. It requires more arbiter involvement than necessary. It's more likely for people to lose on time before 40 moves than it is for people to multi press the clock. The 30 minutes after 40 moves setting is far simpler and less prone to error imo.
More likely yes, but atleast with watching arbiters they can check that. Can you imagine the chaos we would have if unrated players blindly double tapped the clocks, since there is no camera? All results would have to be abandoned
@@PratLegacy -Not really, they're playing on DGT Boards, it's easy to confirm the number of moves made (which is what is being done now anyway). Beginners don't tend to press the clock multiple times but rather forget to press it periodically.This could impact them negatively by having time added a move or two later potentially but this would be entirely their fault, on the other hand,in this system the onus is on the opponent to observe and even make a claim about time being added before 40 moves which can also be a challenge given how beginners tend not to keep note accurately.They're both reasonable options but I lean more towards the other setting.
Не понял ни единого слова его. Но спасибо комментатору ниже, что объяснил.
The only game where you are not allowed to cheer loudly... Even we can cheer in snooker.. hahaha..
because mind need peace and body need noise
Good explanation Sir!
Anish was winning anyway, and his team was winning anyway ... That's why he was extra chill, even if he is usually chill enough
That's Garry Kasparov if he was a defensive player😂
I did not understand the explanation,
How misleading the description of the video is..
Player gets 30 min after 40 moves. If they couldn't complete 40 moves under the 1st time control of 90 minutes they lose on time.
So in this clock settings 30 minutes starts automatically after the end of previous 90 mins.
What happened is the last move that Eric made was his 40th move but he couldn't make it under 1st 90 min. It was made in 2nd time control so he actually lost on time.
I hope it's clear now.
Imagine if Sagar Shah had shouted in bw the conversation : Whatttttttttt , Oh My Godddddd !!! The position is totally lost for Eric !!
😂
I love how everyone whispers but anish
There are at least 30 comments that say the exact same thing.
I didn't understand how the clock handles the fact that the 40th move is over? What happens when the players complete 40 moves? Who adds the time to the clock, as the clock has no counter and no way of knowing when 40 moves have been completed. I understand that when the time reaches 0, 30 minutes is added but nobody completes 40 moves with his clock down to exact zero seconds. Do the arbiters intervene and add the time?
The counter that he mentions is not the chess move counter but simply how many times the clock is pressed. So that's why the arbiter mentioned that it has certain disadvantages.
why the heck would they ever set the clock to add 30 mins without time counter? ....
But what was the convo?
Too much arrogance from these young players. Flagged means flagged. Evidence is there. Stop wasting other people's time and effort.
Eric lost on time. feels bad, man......
Position was bad.
Anish is a Chessbrah too!
Why does it feel like they are whispering when they talk???
If time is out then it’s a flag and it’s over no ? What’s the problem with this timer ?
Eric looks buffed.
They need to upgrade the clock, whatever i understand if Clock time reached to 00:00:00 then why clock add more time on it. time can only add when Atleast 1 second left
The arbiter explained it very clearly. Plus the fact that only 28 seconds was added instead of 30 seconds was clear proof that the flag had fallen and Hansen was 2 secinds short. The conversation with the players shouldn't have needed to last that long.
ASMR chess video 😂
i really dont know what is going on but asmr acha hai
We have Gary Kasparov at Home!
The Gary Kasparov at home....
Giri could have been a pianist, freakishly long fingers
If Eric flagged, why did Anish keep playing? The play was eratic on both sides after the alleged flag. Like, blunder city. Is there a video of this where we can see what actually happened? I'd like to hear Eric speak on this as he has no difficult accent. Are the clocks there cheap crap? My chess clock tells me if I flag. How did this happen?
7:02 you can see that the clock actually notified the flag
No on cares what you'd like... hah... keep talking crap😌
I have a question, the deputy chief arbitrer mentioned that the additional 30mins are added after the time reaches 0:00. Lets say if 40 moves are played with 5 mins time remaining, how will the second time control time be added?? Is it gonna be added only after 0:00 or will the arbitrer need to interfere and add the additional time?
In this case, If 40 moves are already played, then only after clock hitting 0:00 the time control will be added. So that you can have the rest of the time and additional time.
There are also clocks which work other way. (That's the question at the end)
Someone like Eric is not "inexperienced" and should know better and show a modicum of humility. The clock isn't there as a "suggestion", it's part of the game. I'm kind of not surprised these antics are coming from someone who goes by the pompas handle "chessbrah" on YT.
So what happened..tell us someone
I think they should continue playing, especially if Anish Giri doesn’t care.
At first look me: what Garry Kasparov doing there 😅
Those guy mentioned about Garry Kasparov, open your two EYES HE IS NOT A GARRY KASPAROV AS YOUR TALKING ABOUT. OPEN YOUR EYES 200% 🤣
U must be fun at party 🤣🤣🤣
thanks brad pitt
Isn't Anish the only one who can claim the win if opponent flags?
Back in my day 20 years ago when I was still a professional player only the player or the arbiter could point out when someone had won on time. However it’s quite possible that the rules have changed since then.
He is looking like gary kasparov ...as well as his way of speaking is sane as the way of gary .... but he is looking more patient than gary
Read the detail at the discription box
Opponent ne flag kr diya h bhai flag means usne jo time diya tha uske andar apko chal chlna tha apke moves jyda ho gye hai watch time me yahi show ho rha h waise in log watch kharab ho gya h krke bol rhe h sayad.....
This happend only because chess is the only sport that no arbiter is present during the hole game !!!
What the heck did they say? I can't hear anything lol
I like this game more than chess
Sound is not coming
So friends who won the game!!!
That guy next to the arbiter sure looks like Garry Kasparov's twin who got lost in Kumbh Mela.........hope Garry sees this and reunites with him......like RameshSuresh...😀
So who did win?
"Hiss Hass fiss gss lss dsss kss ylss " what the hell 🤣🙏
For a second I thought it's Kasparov 😂😂
00:50 kya yaar GARRY KASPAROV ko samjhane k liye aan pada, apne me maamla suljana chiye naa
What is the confusion all about ?
Eric didn't make his 40th move within the 1st time control. He was 2 seconds late. He lost on time. There is absolutely nothing wrong with the clock and Eric knows it very well then why make such a big deal out of it ? He should have just shook hands with Anish and moved on. His position was anyways lost.
Not confusion but chess needs some drama too 😉
Gopa , the star 🌟
What a joke. Why do they even play with increments. These are pro players. Fischer claimed computers ruined the sport, but He did! Hard to take the olympiad seriously between this and all the dubious draws.