The Sukhoi Su-57 fighter jet can carry the R-37M long-range hypersonic air-to-air missile. Range: The R-37M has a range of up to 400 kilometers and can engage a variety of targets, including fighters, bombers, and early warning aircraft. Speed: The R-37M has a speed of Mach 6. Warhead: The R-37M has a 61 kilogram warhead. Guidance: The R-37M can be guided semi-actively or actively. Altitude: The R-37M can attack targets at altitudes between 15,000 and 25,000 meters.
Thats been a few months now.But remember that F16 that MSN said got shot down by a Patriot.You would think the patriot could notice the F16 was on there side.It was a Russian jet with the R37 missile.Mig 31 maybe or an SU35.
The F-16 is mature, is works and is a proven, reliable system. The SU 57 is an experimental plane, russia is lucky if it can take off without falling apart.
@@stefannaumann4010 no matter how you are jealous but F16 is just a toy in compare any Su like Su27M3 Su30sm2 Su35s and powerful Su57, also F16 can hit 2 mach without weapons, but Su57 go 2.6 or more with new engines with payload in bomb bay no drag and radar 500km he can kill F16 before F16 know that missile track him, sorry but for sake of truth.
Speak the truth if you can. People here in the comments section already know that the SU-57 has a far greater number of missile types and glide bombs in its arsenal and the other fact is, it can track and hit you from a distance front and rear that western fighter jets can not. They also have a missile to attack targets from behind. The jet doesn't have to be head on to attack.
They could end up saying, 'You are parroting the Kremlin line. You know how the western Media work; Say the Truth about Zionist, you are anti-Semitic, Questions gay marriage, you are an enemy of Democracy, say Russian 🇷🇺 are on the right track of the history, you are a KBG spy. Lot load of shit
@@stefannaumann4010@stefannaumann4010 - All I know is that the F35 sank in the South China Sea with no China missile intact, and the F22 runaway when the SU-35 appeared in the Syrian sky, a true real jetfighter battle; what do you expect from ancient F16 capabilities? It will showcase a flock of gazelle predated by hungry hunter-lions in the sky.
The SU 57 is a product of the russian propaganda. Why isn't it deployed to russia's attack against Ukraine? Due to the same reason, why the T-14 Armata isn't deployed: its a piece of sh*t and will be humiliated by 30 years old Western weapons.
the comparison came from facts, in banderastan there are also other comparisons, su35 and f16 su30mk and f16 then there are no chances for nato pilots on f16 to survive when they encounter russian infinitely superior airplanes none of ypu remember that f16 in ukraine are old and have thousand hours of work on their airplanes
The SU-57 is only partially "Stealth". It has a high radar cross section and virtually no counter radar measures. Actually comparing the two isn't as far off as many think. Kinda more like an apples to different variety of apples comparison. An original type vs a GMO hybrid.
can not agree, comparing just "paper" is not always relevant, but when "real fights" was not proceed, at least from one side, there is only way... And, here they take also scenarios, like fighting on enemy area... sure, is not totally complete, but common, both are crazy complex, war is complex... pilot is crazy complex 🙂 ... For the time and long of the video, this is good level of solid information
Variations of the failed jet fighter indicate that the F16 is more powerful in the Western Perspective. It is just a story of Messerschmidt vs MIG 19 for the enemy.
Different jets for different roles. You can still upgrade an F-16 with the newest radars and weapons - and that's frankly all you need for air-to-air combat. No SU-57 will even come close to an F-16 with the newest upgrades (not sure what Ukraine got). F-22 and F-35 are stealth jets. They can take out anti-air for example and F-16s could penetrate deeper into enemy territory after that.
@i.c.wiener2750 what? Do you think an old tech GMC car w new electronic tech with similar engine size and design to compete with a new Tesla? Come on man.🙈
yeah that su 57 has been shot down a few times now already.. funny stuff.. an 80's model F16 kicking a 6th gen alleged stealth fighter LMFAO and to add salt to the wound they have pulled them back into russia and to add a little alcohol to the salt in the wound .. china wont buy em... they literally are falling a part.. fly a few times and have structural cracks... funny shit..
@thecactusman17 no one has seen an su-57 up close they have only seen a prototype that is what is at the airshow it is just more propaganda Russia can and has made some of the best airplanes on the planet their bomber can put run our fighter jets they also beat us to space don't trust everything you hear
If this was true, which it is not, the US Military wouldn't use them anymore... That's the difference between the USA, and Russia, because Russia will use a weapon system as long as it will fire... It makes no difference how many people will be killed from using that weapon... Russia know the system is not as good as they would like, as long as it will fly they use it...
Only in UA-cam fantasy world would an elusive SU-57 appear over Ukraine sky's. Vlad may be stupid but he's not dumb enough to risk one of the few top of the line fighters he has regardless of it's superiority over 4th generation fighters.
The F16s are defending the murdering Russian shaheed and cruise missiles sent to kill children and grandparents! Notice how NO Russian jets dare to search for any F16 over Ukrainian air space. If the SU 57 is such a monster then where is Russian air suppression much less air superiority. I am pretty sure Russian pilots can even piss in a can!
@@spencethegreat38 That's not true. Stick to the facts, or go lolling on the playground across the street. They can fly them, but of course not as Western pilots with 10 years of experience
@@P1_384 The 80's model f 16's already been killing these things off and putz wont talk about it.. they have pulled them back into russia and none flying in or around Ukraine any more and what is even funnier.... china wont buy em because they falling apart after a few flights... literally getting cracks in them.
The SU-57 is so superior to the F-16 that the Russians are not using them to gain air superiority in Ukraine. Let's see how the SU'-57 does up against the F-22 Raptor......LMAO
Dude, Top Gun is in the movie, and the Jet Fighter vlog is a fairy tale. The battle is the genuine proof of war machines. Syrian and Ukriane sky has shown the real winner of the sky battle.
can you share a source? I have no problem to believe, this happen, actually I wanna to have little more arguments to explain advantages of the Russian planes. Even, it's not really because of "Russian" planes, it's about technology, construction and methodologies - how to use knowledge and put this to the technology... Thanks
@@michaelferrari2201 I'm not even American my dude, but what should I be watching if I were you? Also I feel like you're the person following some disinformation. Russia is a big country, but not a rich country. Technological advantages cost a lot of money and years if not decades of support for the education sector. The American universities are the best in the world and produce the best engineers and scientists. Russia can't compete. Also Russia is isolated. For example AFAIK Germany is leading in the production of optics. You need optics for literally everything, especially for manufacturing small electronics. Russia won't be getting this, so no advanced homemade electronics for Russia. And that's just one easy example. So how do you think a country which has neither the funds, nor the connections will be a technological leader?
Interesting video. In this video the SU-57 is only being compared to the F-16 ; which is probably the least { deadliest } of all the USAF and allied planes. Saying that , that doesn't degrade the F-16's capabilities. : Then as you go up in the capability standpoint - if the F-16 wasn't gonna be a good choice to go head to head with the SU-57 , you have the F-15 EX ( Eagle II ) - The F-35's - F-22's as you go up the ladder of planes that can be selected from. Using the F-16's ; F-15's ; F-35's and F-22's all together at once then the SU-57 would be very much over whelmed because the USAF and all of it's allies have a much greater number of planes that can be deployed.
That's like a hawk trying to take on an eagle. Even the numbers are in very bad odds. It partly explains why we hear so little about the F16s. Hardly a game changer
The Russian fighter jets are not a commercial commodity like the jets made in the US, or Europe. Russia doesn't need to sell these jets in order to finance its industry, since the Russian Aerospace Industry is a strategic national asset and not a profitable private manufacturer like the ones found in the US and Europe. Russian fighter jets are sold to friendly countries at cost, which cannot be said for the western jets sold tp NATO member states or others (India or Pakistan, Greece or Turkey) exploiting the artificial mistrust between such adversaries cultivated on purpose in order to sell them mostly inferior to Russian, Western-NATO-made fighter jets.
Now ask yourself which country is interested in the purchase of the SU 57, and which countries already purchased the F-35. And ask yourself, why. Apart from russian propaganda.
@@stefannaumann4010 Which Russian propaganda? Russia is militarily defeating a country trained and armed with the best of what they have in their arsenals in fifty Western countries, which are too cowardly to do it themselves and use it as a proxy against Russia. Enough said.
@@stefannaumann4010 You forgot to questionmark your question. I'll let that pass. Now then, ask yourself which country is interested in the purchase of the F-18 Hornet after the Yemenis in sandals shot one out of the sky?
@@Crete1943 The F-18 is still being flown by multiple NATO countries in active service, and the one shot down in the Red Sea was destroyed by friendly fire which was trying to intercept incoming drone and rocket attacks. The Yemenis have yet to damage any NATO aircraft.
F16's gun has an effective firing range of about 3km, not 6km, the 30mm cannon from Su 57 has a effective firing range of 1.8km. Interesting, that the 20mm has a bigger range than the Sukhoi's 30mm. F16's topspeed is 2.05 WITH afterburner, combat range is about 339miles or 546km and not 3200mi, the ferry range of the F16 is about 2600mi. Su 57 combat range is about 1200km or 745mi, ferry range ist 5500km or ~3400mi.
Ru jets are usually bigger because they need bigger fuel tanks and longer range to cover a wider area. and Ru doesnt have 800 bases around the world for refueling. Its not like tanks. there is no light/heavy division.
You forgot that the Su57, can use BVR (Beyond virtual range) and the f16 won't even know what killed it. Taking china's recent airshow into consideration, Su57 is the best in dog fights performance against even f22 and f35 . Truth be told in DCS(Digital Combat Simulators) it's true capabilities weren't even captured, because it's a true secret, the model flown in the airshow was even an older prototype. Don't foget that Su57 can launch an air to air missile in a vertical cobra maneuver. The Russians are indeed great in aerospace tech.
Hi. Thought it was interesting. Though from the description of each plane, it's like describing planes built for different things. The Suzuki K truck is great and does well in landscape work and light construction site hauling. On the other hand, it doesn't go down the highway like a Chevy Silverado. Two good machines. Two different purposes. Just a guess!!
Thank you for your programming in your presentation. Then, one of the key factors that no one else has mentioned. That is the mental capability to fight and the ability of the pilot in the F-16 to go above and beyond what is expected of him. That is the key in any scenario. Knowing what your mental and physical capabilities are as a pilot. No, with your capabilities, the capability of the aircraft, your aircraft, and your weapon systems, keep your head on a swivel; then go for it. Thank you.
Dogfights are highly improbable anyways. F-16s have so far only been used to shoot down anti-ground missiles, and Su-57s have only been used to deploy air-to-surface missiles and also destroy one of their own drone planes which malfunctioned several weeks back.
Because they were sent in an effort of Bidens puppet to empty european nato countries militaries of their old fighters so that usa can sell them new fighters. Ukr F-16 were never supposed to do anything for ukraine. This is of course true for the whole war. Only usa benefits,of selling weapons. And usa puppets paid.
Good analysis. There are portions of each aircrafts envelope that gives them an advantage over the other. I recall similar analysis done between various aircraft back in the sixties and seventies. In the majority of the cases the Soviet/Russian aircraft had an advantage. When they came up against each other it all boiled down how well the side using American Aircraft integrated their various systems into an overall battle plan and how well their pilots and ground crews were trained. I will reserve judgement until they are actually going toe to toe all out with maximum sortie rates.
it' amazing that on paper they say the su 57 is better, yet only now when they on are on the verge of loosing the war it finally comes out to play! It will still loose.
The loophole in the Russian airport is its active radar! The F-16 advantage is in the ability to use opposing radar waves, rendering it invisable both to the Suk and its radar guided missiles.
The Gun ranges are completely off the charts. IF an airplane shoots it's bullets at maximum altitude, and the bullet hits the ground, is the maximum altitude its "Gun range"? NO. They are usually sighted to about 800 meters. Probably variable to about double that. Is that accurate? NO. But that's the official "range". Ok, after 2 minutes, i am only 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣. You guys are just🤯
After F16 BLK 60 the F16 radar can easily track the SU 57 at 100 km + using the RCS stated by the manufacturer of 1 msq. That means there is range advantage for the SU 57.
Well everyone has an opinion. Anyone fly one of these? Mm. Lottsa key questions interspersed. 1. Pilot training and flight hours determine skill which is unmatched in Western pilots. 2. Maintenance to readiness status. Which is just crappy for the SU but really good for the 16. 3. 12:36 Weapons reliability. Half the SU weapons are duds. All the 16 s work 100% of the time. 4. Credibility of the described aircraft. Not so good with the SU. Absolutely true and then some with the 16 and superb with the Super 16. 5. Encryption of weapons systems mmmm. Might be a problem for the SU but not the super 16. The swap out is first rate. So if it’s a super 16 just might be very interesting especially if it two 16s va one Su mmm oh yeah I forgot there is only one SU that is flight ready mmm
It well documents of how NATO F-35 struggled with SU-35. SU-35 successfully jammed F-35 radars and communication practically making it inoperable. SU-57 has much superior electronic warfare technology as compared to SU-35.
We have been told about several game chargers which have never changed anything and I think It is high time the west acknowledge that Russian's military hardware is more sophisticated than the western one. We have been told about the Leopard Tanks, F16, US Air Defence systems, Bradley Tank and all the long range missiles from USA, UK and France which haven't changed anything. I am starting wonder whether we are being told the truth at all.😂😂😂😂😂😂
@dr.feelgood9104 then you are ignorant to believe Elon musk he's not an expert about that jet....I feel a little bit funny about all people who believe in Russian weapons like what Russian government told on their propaganda if you are selling your weapon you will never tell that your weapon is no good, course you say that your weapon is very advance than your compitator that's business bro. Too bad even how you convince everyone that Russia is far ahead from united states, you only embarrass yourself reality speaks hahaha!
This is not comparable, we have 2 completely different aircraft and both have their advantages and disadvantages. We've all heard of the Indian Air Force's MiG-21 downing, which means it's possible to surprise any pilot, including a Russian pilot, in an SU 57. When NATO was at the peak of its power, it lost F-16s and Mirages over Bosnia, as the Americans asked, lost F-117s and many other planes over Serbia to outdated air defense systems. I'd like to see a comparison between the MiG-35 and the F-16. Given that Russia has announced mass production of the MiG-35 in 2025, there is a much greater possibility that these two aircraft will meet, if it is announced that mass production will begin in 2025, it means that it is already underway and that the first MiG-35 aircraft will appear in early 2025.
Putting a SU57 in Ukraine skies is very risky F16 wouldn’t have to fight as a Patriot system would have missile lock as soon as it entered that airspace. Also, the only reason why a squadron of su57 wouldn’t be launched to Ukraine is because Putin doesn’t have a squadron of them! Also, Poland’s F35 would be in the air after them Russia is ill equipped and can’t be threat that they want to be Oh, also the RAF are now the third best armed forces in Russia as well as in Ukraine
You can have the greatest aircraft in the world but what it comes down to is the pilot who is flying the aircraft. Electronics is great but it can be jammed. Biggest and baddest doesn't mean the best.
😂😂😂 The F16 is an old fighter but still capable of taking out the Russian planes. This is a load of old bollocks the SU 57 is like every other Russian weapon over inflated and under performing
First of all , I think this author is trying to compare two incompatible jet fighters. SU 54 is far more superior to F16. , I believe this is a paid advertisement for F16 If F16 has all this “great” characteristics as speculated in this video, why has it failed so woefully in Ukraine?
I'm afraid air and surface fleets are the last war, type weapons. Nothing floating can carry enough anti-missle, missles to get within a 1,000 miles of someone's shore.
it's laughable. SU-57 is capable of "supermaneuverability" feature: both of it's engine nozzles can pivot in any direction in addition to aerodynamic surfaces to provide agility which f-16 never will obtain with his engine's fixed nozzle. Also, SU-57 will attack f-16 from a distance on which Russian De)ath wistler is hardly detectable (especially without top-notch Radar systems).
On the end, this will stay on Pilot, very good comparison, course mostly based on paper, but this is OK, those never stay against each other. Very good was also taking the "scenario" to the account. Unfortunately, looks like soon or later, this match must came. Both side sure will try to create situation, where they have most advantages... From the training, Ukrainian pilots will be also in worst position, for them F-16 is totally new and different plane they fly with. Russians have advantage, also not total superior, cause Su-57 is quiet "young" plane. From "PR" perspective, sure Ukrainians have big advantage, besides the facts, Wester allies and media will cover any problem like hell, on every "front" and media, underestimate and harm SU-57 as much as possible. From this POW, loose of 1 SU-57 will be that bad as for Ukrainian lost at least half of the whole squadron of F-16s in 2-3 days... On the end, it's a very pity, that such an technological achievement, as both planes represents, is only used for political games, blood and making money... Not for killing, for making the money... how many peoples dye is totally of the table... F-16 is long time serving, very old lady, and don't hear the propaganda, "old-soviet era" based planes, like Mig-29, Su-27... are even little bit "younger" than F-16 in reality, and for sure, Mig-29 and Su-27 can by quiet good, and deadly competitors to the F-16... Su-57... crazy nice, big, superior beast... sure even beasts have disadvantages, or at least "weak point"... but now... SU-27 is the King of the sky, SU-57 can be, may be, the GOD of the sky... Maybe, for now...
As a 5th gen fighter, the SU57 fails horribly. It has tweaked old 4th gen Russian jet engines and very poor stealth capabilty. Hundreds of times less stealthy than planes like the F35, despite the Russians claiming it is superior to the F35.
IF the Su 57 performs as well as you claim. One big problem is the inherent corruption in thr Russian military. Some general may have sold the pilot's seat for a case of vodka.
This is not the movie "top Gun Maverick"😂😂
The movies are the only place America wins it's wars these days
That was the F-14. Good story though bro.
@@lastofthev8interceptors411 1,034 days since the "3 days special operation" has commenced in Ukraine
@Old_Gunslinger_Wild_Bill not bad for a lone Russia holding the line against nato's trillion dollar modern "army" 🤡👌🤣🤣🤣 go cry somewhere else weirdo.
Real Topguns Are Iranian not american
The Sukhoi Su-57 fighter jet can carry the R-37M long-range hypersonic air-to-air missile.
Range: The R-37M has a range of up to 400 kilometers and can engage a variety of targets, including fighters, bombers, and early warning aircraft.
Speed: The R-37M has a speed of Mach 6.
Warhead: The R-37M has a 61 kilogram warhead.
Guidance: The R-37M can be guided semi-actively or actively.
Altitude: The R-37M can attack targets at altitudes between 15,000 and 25,000 meters.
Thank you! Great comment!👍
What else does the russian propaganda tell you?
@@stefannaumann4010 Is that you go to answer?Because everything he said is true and you can look it up.
Turkey said one of the Russian jets with the R37 missile shot down a Ukrainian F16 with a record shot of 250 klm.
Thats been a few months now.But remember that F16 that MSN said got shot down by a Patriot.You would think the patriot could notice the F16 was on there side.It was a Russian jet with the R37 missile.Mig 31 maybe or an SU35.
One must admit, that the Su-57 has one of the most badass nato nicknames - The Felon.
Dude! A true felon that machine is,No doubt about it , a real killing high-tech device!.
@@SKwoodsman that is indeed a badass name 😎
That's about it the name why you think Putin's afraid to let it out of Russia just like Russia it's a paper tiger
Is it better than the "terminator" ?
@@derekallen4486 Don't be so salty
They are not comparable. F-16 is a junior system to su57. STOP nonsensical thinking
I stopped watching the moment he said that F-16 is 4.5th generation plane.
He is an idiot
The F-16 is mature, is works and is a proven, reliable system. The SU 57 is an experimental plane, russia is lucky if it can take off without falling apart.
@@stefannaumann4010Regardless of upgrades, the F-16 is an over fifty year old design.
@@stefannaumann4010 no matter how you are jealous but F16 is just a toy in compare any Su like Su27M3 Su30sm2 Su35s and powerful Su57, also F16 can hit 2 mach without weapons, but Su57 go 2.6 or more with new engines with payload in bomb bay no drag and radar 500km he can kill F16 before F16 know that missile track him, sorry but for sake of truth.
Speak the truth if you can. People here in the comments section already know that the SU-57 has a far greater number of missile types and glide bombs in its arsenal and the other fact is, it can track and hit you from a distance front and rear that western fighter jets can not. They also have a missile to attack targets from behind. The jet doesn't have to be head on to attack.
They could end up saying,
'You are parroting the Kremlin line.
You know how the western Media work;
Say the Truth about Zionist, you are anti-Semitic, Questions gay marriage, you are an enemy of Democracy, say Russian 🇷🇺 are on the right track of the history, you are a KBG spy.
Lot load of shit
Yeah, according to russian propaganda, you are right. In reality, the SU 57 falls from the sky when it enters Ukrainian airspace.
@@stefannaumann4010@stefannaumann4010 - All I know is that the F35 sank in the South China Sea with no China missile intact, and the F22 runaway when the SU-35 appeared in the Syrian sky, a true real jetfighter battle; what do you expect from ancient F16 capabilities? It will showcase a flock of gazelle predated by hungry hunter-lions in the sky.
@@stefannaumann4010the video is Russian propaganda?!
@@stefannaumann4010 a junkies f series failing every day and more in shop than in air. good only in holywood bullshit
F16 is a venerable old aircraft from 1970s Su57 M is a stealth air superiority multirole aircraft. Your comparison is stupid.
Another European comparison, Noone is better than me.
The SU 57 is a product of the russian propaganda. Why isn't it deployed to russia's attack against Ukraine? Due to the same reason, why the T-14 Armata isn't deployed: its a piece of sh*t and will be humiliated by 30 years old Western weapons.
the comparison came from facts, in banderastan there are also other comparisons, su35 and f16
su30mk and f16
then there are no chances for nato pilots on f16 to survive when they encounter russian infinitely superior airplanes
none of ypu remember that f16 in ukraine are old and have thousand hours of work on their airplanes
The SU-57 is only partially "Stealth". It has a high radar cross section and virtually no counter radar measures. Actually comparing the two isn't as far off as many think. Kinda more like an apples to different variety of apples comparison. An original type vs a GMO hybrid.
can not agree, comparing just "paper" is not always relevant, but when "real fights" was not proceed, at least from one side, there is only way...
And, here they take also scenarios, like fighting on enemy area... sure, is not totally complete, but common, both are crazy complex, war is complex... pilot is crazy complex 🙂 ...
For the time and long of the video, this is good level of solid information
If F16 is so powerfull and sophisticated ,what for you needs a F35 and F22?
Variations of the failed jet fighter indicate that the F16 is more powerful in the Western Perspective. It is just a story of Messerschmidt vs MIG 19 for the enemy.
Different jets for different roles. You can still upgrade an F-16 with the newest radars and weapons - and that's frankly all you need for air-to-air combat. No SU-57 will even come close to an F-16 with the newest upgrades (not sure what Ukraine got).
F-22 and F-35 are stealth jets. They can take out anti-air for example and F-16s could penetrate deeper into enemy territory after that.
@i.c.wiener2750 what? Do you think an old tech GMC car w new electronic tech with similar engine size and design to compete with a new Tesla? Come on man.🙈
США могли дать f-35 но побоялись что их собьют русские самолёты
@@i.c.wiener2750 Yeah, right .
F16 against SU-57 is like taking a knife to a gun fight
yeah that su 57 has been shot down a few times now already.. funny stuff.. an 80's model F16 kicking a 6th gen alleged stealth fighter LMFAO and to add salt to the wound they have pulled them back into russia and to add a little alcohol to the salt in the wound .. china wont buy em... they literally are falling a part.. fly a few times and have structural cracks... funny shit..
Yeah, I wouldn't want to go up against an F-16 with something held together with woodscrews either.
@thecactusman17 no one has seen an su-57 up close they have only seen a prototype that is what is at the airshow it is just more propaganda Russia can and has made some of the best airplanes on the planet their bomber can put run our fighter jets they also beat us to space don't trust everything you hear
Acually it's like taking a M60 to a revolver fight
If this was true, which it is not, the US Military wouldn't use them anymore... That's the difference between the USA, and Russia, because Russia will use a weapon system as long as it will fire... It makes no difference how many people will be killed from using that weapon... Russia know the system is not as good as they would like, as long as it will fly they use it...
The narrative is one of imaginative thinking it has no bearing of truth
How so?
Only in UA-cam fantasy world would an elusive SU-57 appear over Ukraine sky's.
Vlad may be stupid but he's not dumb enough to risk one of the few top of the line fighters he has regardless of it's superiority over 4th generation fighters.
Zelensky begged for F-16's ! Now he forgot all about them .
no, now they have a new problem how to hide them on a ground!
He forgot the Game, they were supposed to change.
The F16s are defending the murdering Russian shaheed and cruise missiles sent to kill children and grandparents! Notice how NO Russian jets dare to search for any F16 over Ukrainian air space. If the SU 57 is such a monster then where is Russian air suppression much less air superiority. I am pretty sure Russian pilots can even piss in a can!
No one in Ukraine can fly them lol
@@spencethegreat38 That's not true. Stick to the facts, or go lolling on the playground across the street. They can fly them, but of course not as Western pilots with 10 years of experience
F 16s are Childrens Toys compared to the SU-57 , period
And you make these pronouncements from the Front, nah... probably lives in the States? I hear they have maybe 10 set up for battle, probably fewer.
@@P1_384 Which Murican pansy plane is the Lawn-Dart & which is the Hangar-Queen ?🤣
LMFAOO That is why china wont buy em and they being downed left and right by old 80's F16s and putz doesnt want to talk about it...where you been???
@@P1_384 The 80's model f 16's already been killing these things off and putz wont talk about it.. they have pulled them back into russia and none flying in or around Ukraine any more and what is even funnier.... china wont buy em because they falling apart after a few flights... literally getting cracks in them.
@@zazz69ed Putz ??? you frGGng Cre_Tin.
An F-16 pilot won't know that an SU-57 is in the air until he's ejecting.
😂😂😂
@@afelder2363 it doesn't exist
The SU-57 is so superior to the F-16 that the Russians are not using them to gain air superiority in Ukraine. Let's see how the SU'-57 does up against the F-22 Raptor......LMAO
@@afelder2363There's no F24s in Ukraine
@@afelder2363 How many of those are flying there?
Dude, Top Gun is in the movie, and the Jet Fighter vlog is a fairy tale. The battle is the genuine proof of war machines. Syrian and Ukriane sky has shown the real winner of the sky battle.
Putin holds all master pieces of game changer glory to Mother Russia 🇷🇺
❤🇷🇺
so now they can win?
Yeah, if putler wanted, he could conquer Europe in 3 days. He's just kidding around for 3 years now.
Wonder waffen iaaaaaa 😂😂😂😂
And hows that working out for him?
You didn't mention pilot skills..
Compare f16 to su 35 not su57
F 16 is comperramble with Mig 29, not Su 35. F 16 is at the moment outdating model (about 35 years) and thats NATO gave it to Ukraina
They are in the same airspace it's valid.
Exactly you right here bro
@@ambrosekabogoza7031 Elon musk said f35 is idiot product 😁 . Super expensive and very often got crashed
@@PetarStajkovic-gj4fnf16 make your capital crying in 99 you forget millosh 😂😂😂
From someone who knows nothing about specs, can I just say it's a beautifully produced video and thecSU-57 is gorgeous 😍
I think the only downfall of the 57 is it’s operable numbers which I think is below 10…😳
The SU57 is a beautiful jet. It looks like it's going 1,000,000 miles an hour standing still.
The most cappest thing i've ever heard son.
@EveryOppsLack Well just because your stupid doesn't make you right.
F-16 is not 4.5th generation plane my man. Jeez.
He probably means the latest modernizations of F-16
But the SU 57 is a 4.5 gen fighter
Anyway, there are at least two kills on F-16 made by Su-57, the rest have been made by MiG-31 ( one kill ) and Su-30/35 ( three kills ).
can you share a source? I have no problem to believe, this happen, actually I wanna to have little more arguments to explain advantages of the Russian planes.
Even, it's not really because of "Russian" planes, it's about technology, construction and methodologies - how to use knowledge and put this to the technology...
Thanks
Games on UA-cam don't count.
@@jozefdubovec200 Don't be fooled, Russia will never have a technological advantage anywhere.
@@i.c.wiener2750 stop watching CNN
@@michaelferrari2201 I'm not even American my dude, but what should I be watching if I were you?
Also I feel like you're the person following some disinformation.
Russia is a big country, but not a rich country. Technological advantages cost a lot of money and years if not decades of support for the education sector. The American universities are the best in the world and produce the best engineers and scientists. Russia can't compete.
Also Russia is isolated. For example AFAIK Germany is leading in the production of optics. You need optics for literally everything, especially for manufacturing small electronics. Russia won't be getting this, so no advanced homemade electronics for Russia. And that's just one easy example.
So how do you think a country which has neither the funds, nor the connections will be a technological leader?
Interesting video. In this video the SU-57 is only being compared to the F-16 ; which is probably the least { deadliest } of all the USAF and allied planes. Saying that , that doesn't degrade the F-16's capabilities. : Then as you go up in the capability standpoint - if the F-16 wasn't gonna be a good choice to go head to head with the SU-57 , you have the F-15 EX ( Eagle II ) - The F-35's - F-22's as you go up the ladder of planes that can be selected from. Using the F-16's ; F-15's ; F-35's and F-22's all together at once then the SU-57 would be very much over whelmed because the USAF and all of it's allies have a much greater number of planes that can be deployed.
That's like a hawk trying to take on an eagle. Even the numbers are in very bad odds. It partly explains why we hear so little about the F16s. Hardly a game changer
F16s are shooting down incoming missiles, flying CAPs. Anyway say again, how many enemy jets has the SU-57 shot down... oh, yah, exactly ZERO.
Rubbish
THE TRUTH HURTS.
SU- 57 IS SUPERIOR TO F-16 AND F- 35, PERIOD.
Rubbish bot😅
США отдала Абрам станки в Украине могли бы ей 10 самолётов f-35 дать Украине бояться США что их самолёты собьют русские
It might be "Superior" to the Goodyear Blimp or Hindenburg but in real life the Felon couldn't find "Tits in a Strip Club" when it counts.
@@paulfisher3eNo, it is truth. The SU 57 already has a confirmed kill from a great distance confirmed by NATO member Turkey.
The Russian fighter jets are not a commercial commodity like the jets made in the US, or Europe. Russia doesn't need to sell these jets in order to finance its industry, since the Russian Aerospace Industry is a strategic national asset and not a profitable private manufacturer like the ones found in the US and Europe. Russian fighter jets are sold to friendly countries at cost, which cannot be said for the western jets sold tp NATO member states or others (India or Pakistan, Greece or Turkey) exploiting the artificial mistrust between such adversaries cultivated on purpose in order to sell them mostly inferior to Russian, Western-NATO-made fighter jets.
Now ask yourself which country is interested in the purchase of the SU 57, and which countries already purchased the F-35. And ask yourself, why. Apart from russian propaganda.
@@stefannaumann4010 Which Russian propaganda? Russia is militarily defeating a country trained and armed with the best of what they have in their arsenals in fifty Western countries, which are too cowardly to do it themselves and use it as a proxy against Russia. Enough said.
@@stefannaumann4010 You forgot to questionmark your question. I'll let that pass. Now then, ask yourself which country is interested in the purchase of the F-18 Hornet after the Yemenis in sandals shot one out of the sky?
@@Crete1943 The F-18 is still being flown by multiple NATO countries in active service, and the one shot down in the Red Sea was destroyed by friendly fire which was trying to intercept incoming drone and rocket attacks. The Yemenis have yet to damage any NATO aircraft.
You mean it is like an F-22. US will not sell these to anyone.
F16's gun has an effective firing range of about 3km, not 6km, the 30mm cannon from Su 57 has a effective firing range of 1.8km. Interesting, that the 20mm has a bigger range than the Sukhoi's 30mm. F16's topspeed is 2.05 WITH afterburner, combat range is about 339miles or 546km and not 3200mi, the ferry range of the F16 is about 2600mi. Su 57 combat range is about 1200km or 745mi, ferry range ist 5500km or ~3400mi.
@@boogie153 hey yo! Boogie man 😁😁😁
BS, you are comparing apples to oranges. Light fighter to Heavy Fighter
Ru jets are usually bigger because they need bigger fuel tanks and longer range to cover a wider area. and Ru doesnt have 800 bases around the world for refueling.
Its not like tanks. there is no light/heavy division.
Well who is stopping nato from sending f35's
@@VrishabhDhwaj was talking about the comparisons that were made, not actual operations.
Video about F16 and Su57. At 4:31, video shows F18. Helluva deal.
RUbbish video, I'm outta here.
this is a Russian propaganda nonsense story
British-English accent promises big propaganda! Listen to the end if you have nothing better to do.
SU-57 is a very advanced fighter jet. Cannot compare American fighters in any capacity.
The f16 will be in flames before it knows su 57 is airborne
You forgot that the Su57, can use BVR (Beyond virtual range) and the f16 won't even know what killed it. Taking china's recent airshow into consideration, Su57 is the best in dog fights performance against even f22 and f35 . Truth be told in DCS(Digital Combat Simulators) it's true capabilities weren't even captured, because it's a true secret, the model flown in the airshow was even an older prototype. Don't foget that Su57 can launch an air to air missile in a vertical cobra maneuver. The Russians are indeed great in aerospace tech.
FYI-- the BLUE PAINTED bombs are TRAINING BOMBS!
THE PILOTS EXPERIENCE makes the BIG DIFFERENCE
Hi. Thought it was interesting. Though from the description of each plane, it's like describing planes built for different things.
The Suzuki K truck is great and does well in landscape work and light construction site hauling.
On the other hand, it doesn't go down the highway like a Chevy Silverado.
Two good machines. Two different purposes.
Just a guess!!
Thank you for your programming in your presentation. Then, one of the key factors that no one else has mentioned. That is the mental capability to fight and the ability of the pilot in the F-16 to go above and beyond what is expected of him. That is the key in any scenario. Knowing what your mental and physical capabilities are as a pilot. No, with your capabilities, the capability of the aircraft, your aircraft, and your weapon systems, keep your head on a swivel; then go for it. Thank you.
excellent analysis. balanced, factual
This man is after money.
It's a bot.
The only thing about this that would shock me is if the SU-57 could NOT kill an F-16.
Dogfights are highly improbable anyways. F-16s have so far only been used to shoot down anti-ground missiles, and Su-57s have only been used to deploy air-to-surface missiles and also destroy one of their own drone planes which malfunctioned several weeks back.
Improbable but not impossible.
The comments suggest that the Sukhoi is superior.
Kkkkkkkkkkkk why is it that from the time F-16 were sent to Ukraine,why are they not being used up to now
Because they were sent in an effort of Bidens puppet to empty european nato countries militaries of their old fighters so that usa can sell them new fighters. Ukr F-16 were never supposed to do anything for ukraine. This is of course true for the whole war. Only usa benefits,of selling weapons. And usa puppets paid.
Real war is about pilots, doctrine and training. Who's buying the Su-57? Who's flying Su-57's?
MIG-41& SU-57 👍👌💪
SUPERITAS
One thing about the russians, they will never stop thinking that their Defence Tech is not moribund.
And yet the Su57's are being knocked out of the sky by the Ukrainians...
Where is that evidence of SU57S BEEN SHOT OUT OF THE SKY IN UKRAINE ?
Good analysis. There are portions of each aircrafts envelope that gives them an advantage over the other. I recall similar analysis done between various aircraft back in the sixties and seventies. In the majority of the cases the Soviet/Russian aircraft had an advantage. When they came up against each other it all boiled down how well the side using American Aircraft integrated their various systems into an overall battle plan and how well their pilots and ground crews were trained. I will reserve judgement until they are actually going toe to toe all out with maximum sortie rates.
it' amazing that on paper they say the su 57 is better, yet only now when they on are on the verge of loosing the war it finally comes out to play! It will still loose.
West pipe dream of F16 over SU57 can only happened in Hollywood! Keep dreaming America 😂
Your research and presentation is highly questionable
Seem more like propaganda 🙄
The loophole in the Russian airport is its active radar! The F-16 advantage is in the ability to use opposing radar waves, rendering it invisable both to the Suk and its radar guided missiles.
How about P-51 Mustang vs Su-57? I guess Mustang would prevail due to superior machine gun🤣🤣
we have a government that despises about half of us and only focuses on greed and having a good home about 2500 feet below terraferma
Russian technology has always been decades ahead of all the others
Indeed, they always have a Sputnik Moment up that sleeve 🙂
I wouldn't go that far. Do they have advantages in some technologies, sure. All, get real. Lol
Really?
That is probably why their tanks are littering the battle field.
Like their cars and PC's
You mean like the S-400 which has been destroyed by 40 years old ATACMS?
how come the F16 is not coming out to play with SU57.?????
The Gun ranges are completely off the charts. IF an airplane shoots it's bullets at maximum altitude, and the bullet hits the ground, is the maximum altitude its "Gun range"? NO. They are usually sighted to about 800 meters. Probably variable to about double that. Is that accurate? NO. But that's the official "range". Ok, after 2 minutes, i am only 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣. You guys are just🤯
Su 57 is a 5th generation. F16 is a 4th generation that has a simple, inexpensive design. Totally different.
And Milei's last-minute purchase change for very used old outdated version of the F16 that were all bandaged to the head of repairs.
SU-57 is the Trabant of the skies!
The SU-57. so advanced that Russia has now stopped building them as they are unable to source the western components..... at least officially.
We know Russian exaggerated specifications already so until both aircraft meet we don't know.
1st Gen MiG-17s gave 3rd Gen F-4s a very hard time in NAM.
The AI Narrator Is An Idjit Bot . . .
After F16 BLK 60 the F16 radar can easily track the SU 57 at 100 km + using the RCS stated by the manufacturer of 1 msq. That means there is range advantage for the SU 57.
Well everyone has an opinion. Anyone fly one of these? Mm. Lottsa key questions interspersed. 1. Pilot training and flight hours determine skill which is unmatched in Western pilots. 2. Maintenance to readiness status. Which is just crappy for the SU but really good for the 16. 3. 12:36 Weapons reliability. Half the SU weapons are duds. All the 16 s work 100% of the time. 4. Credibility of the described aircraft. Not so good with the SU. Absolutely true and then some with the 16 and superb with the Super 16. 5. Encryption of weapons systems mmmm. Might be a problem for the SU but not the super 16. The swap out is first rate. So if it’s a super 16 just might be very interesting especially if it two 16s va one Su mmm oh yeah I forgot there is only one SU that is flight ready mmm
Maybe putting the stats of each fighter side- by- side in a list for comparison would be easier to compare these jets.
Since the delivery of the F16, the Russians have destroyed some of them.
😂😂😂 Ukrainian propaganda!
It well documents of how NATO F-35 struggled with SU-35. SU-35 successfully jammed F-35 radars and communication practically making it inoperable. SU-57 has much superior electronic warfare technology as compared to SU-35.
All depends on the pilot. Experience has a lot to do with who wins. Close engagement f16 long distance the 57. But a little bit of luck
That's ridiculous a 40-year-old F-16 versus new technology what a joke
I'm pretty sure the F-16 is stealthier than a SU-57. Nothing about the SU-57 is stealthy.
RUSSIA'S POWER 2nd TO NONE😂😂😂😂😂 MOTHER RUSIA THE REAL SUPERPOWER❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
Funny that they don't dare to fly into Ukrainian airspace😂😂
We have been told about several game chargers which have never changed anything and I think It is high time the west acknowledge that Russian's military hardware is more sophisticated than the western one. We have been told about the Leopard Tanks, F16, US Air Defence systems, Bradley Tank and all the long range missiles from USA, UK and France which haven't changed anything. I am starting wonder whether we are being told the truth at all.😂😂😂😂😂😂
the west propaganda... F16 is old model 4th Gen, but su-57 much more sophisticated 6th Gen. Elon Musk said that US F-35 is idiot product hahaha
get a grip
Idiot product? Why are so many lining -up to buy the jets and the su-57 no one is interested buy 😢😢😢😂
@@MexerAngiyonglingkod dont ask, please ask Elon musk 😄😆
@dr.feelgood9104 then you are ignorant to believe Elon musk he's not an expert about that jet....I feel a little bit funny about all people who believe in Russian weapons like what Russian government told on their propaganda if you are selling your weapon you will never tell that your weapon is no good, course you say that your weapon is very advance than your compitator that's business bro. Too bad even how you convince everyone that Russia is far ahead from united states, you only embarrass yourself reality speaks hahaha!
B.S
Assuming that the Russian SU-57 isn't just propaganda as usual. 🙃
He says four can occupy the skies of Europe. Why not occupy the skies of Ukraine? I call BS.
They are lucky Russia don't go all out
This is not comparable, we have 2 completely different aircraft and both have their advantages and disadvantages. We've all heard of the Indian Air Force's MiG-21 downing, which means it's possible to surprise any pilot, including a Russian pilot, in an SU 57. When NATO was at the peak of its power, it lost F-16s and Mirages over Bosnia, as the Americans asked, lost F-117s and many other planes over Serbia to outdated air defense systems. I'd like to see a comparison between the MiG-35 and the F-16. Given that Russia has announced mass production of the MiG-35 in 2025, there is a much greater possibility that these two aircraft will meet, if it is announced that mass production will begin in 2025, it means that it is already underway and that the first MiG-35 aircraft will appear in early 2025.
Putting a SU57 in Ukraine skies is very risky
F16 wouldn’t have to fight as a Patriot system would have missile lock as soon as it entered that airspace.
Also, the only reason why a squadron of su57 wouldn’t be launched to Ukraine is because Putin doesn’t have a squadron of them! Also, Poland’s F35 would be in the air after them
Russia is ill equipped and can’t be threat that they want to be
Oh, also the RAF are now the third best armed forces in Russia as well as in Ukraine
Rubbish
You can have the greatest aircraft in the world but what it comes down to is the pilot who is flying the aircraft. Electronics is great but it can be jammed. Biggest and baddest doesn't mean the best.
😂😂😂 The F16 is an old fighter but still capable of taking out the Russian planes. This is a load of old bollocks the SU 57 is like every other Russian weapon over inflated and under performing
Everyone knows s57 is a paper giant. It has a radar signature so it is not stealthy. Everyone who know this knows it!
First of all , I think this author is trying to compare two incompatible jet fighters. SU 54 is far more superior to F16. , I believe this is a paid advertisement for F16
If F16 has all this “great” characteristics as speculated in this video, why has it failed so woefully in Ukraine?
You can't compare F-16 to SU-57. But if you want to compare F-16 something, compare it to MiG-29/35 family of fighters.
Vladolf Putler is QUITE INSANE at this point in time.
I'm afraid air and surface fleets are the last war, type weapons.
Nothing floating can carry enough anti-missle, missles to get within a 1,000 miles of someone's shore.
They think they are big and bad till they come across a raptor or a f 35. They won't even see coming
...F35 are normally parked in the Repair Hanger.
it's laughable. SU-57 is capable of "supermaneuverability" feature: both of it's engine nozzles can pivot in any direction in addition to aerodynamic surfaces to provide agility which f-16 never will obtain with his engine's fixed nozzle. Also, SU-57 will attack f-16 from a distance on which Russian De)ath wistler is hardly detectable (especially without top-notch Radar systems).
_This video's analysis is based on top gun movie._ 😂😅
On the end, this will stay on Pilot, very good comparison, course mostly based on paper, but this is OK, those never stay against each other. Very good was also taking the "scenario" to the account. Unfortunately, looks like soon or later, this match must came. Both side sure will try to create situation, where they have most advantages...
From the training, Ukrainian pilots will be also in worst position, for them F-16 is totally new and different plane they fly with. Russians have advantage, also not total superior, cause Su-57 is quiet "young" plane.
From "PR" perspective, sure Ukrainians have big advantage, besides the facts, Wester allies and media will cover any problem like hell, on every "front" and media, underestimate and harm SU-57 as much as possible. From this POW, loose of 1 SU-57 will be that bad as for Ukrainian lost at least half of the whole squadron of F-16s in 2-3 days...
On the end, it's a very pity, that such an technological achievement, as both planes represents, is only used for political games, blood and making money... Not for killing, for making the money... how many peoples dye is totally of the table...
F-16 is long time serving, very old lady, and don't hear the propaganda, "old-soviet era" based planes, like Mig-29, Su-27... are even little bit "younger" than F-16 in reality, and for sure, Mig-29 and Su-27 can by quiet good, and deadly competitors to the F-16...
Su-57... crazy nice, big, superior beast... sure even beasts have disadvantages, or at least "weak point"... but now... SU-27 is the King of the sky, SU-57 can be, may be, the GOD of the sky... Maybe, for now...
Every performance is pre determined. The victory or defeat, is probabilistic, and is already known. Only need calibration.
As a 5th gen fighter, the SU57 fails horribly. It has tweaked old 4th gen Russian jet engines and very poor stealth capabilty. Hundreds of times less stealthy than planes like the F35, despite the Russians claiming it is superior to the F35.
Why compare SU-57 of Russia to outdated F-16 of America.
IF the Su 57 performs as well as you claim. One big problem is the inherent corruption in thr Russian military. Some general may have sold the pilot's seat for a case of vodka.
The SU-57 sticks out like a sore thumb