@Alex Ziskind At 6:39, you're wrong on the 14" not being able to max out compared to the 16" models. You can manually upgrade it to be similar to the 16" models, it's just that they don't show that at the summary.
to everyone feeling like the M2 macbook pros were just released and now we are getting new ones again, you aren't crazy. apple delayed the m2 release from last year until january of this year, that is why this release seems too soon. if you can afford the new shiny macbooks go for it, but going with a M1 generation isn't a bad choice either
thanks for reviewing these expensive mac units and helps us gauge if we really need an update as software developers. Your test and comparison helps, keep it up and blessings always^
Same here. I use my M1 Max 64GB for VM & ML tasks. I recently started hitting the unified memory limits & to a lesser extent the CPU limits. Just this past week while running an LLM my M1 Max started swapping GBs out; As such I will be upgrading.
I do appreciate you making these videos Alex! I remember talking with you about NativeScript some time ago, and you making this shift to youtube in order to review products. It was a great transition and you’re really good at it. I love watching down to detail videos like yours with specific comparisons especially us being developers hearing this from a fellow developer with engineering mindset ❤
About the new "Base Model", I was reading a report on that. Not every consumer watch a UA-camr or read about it online. They just go to best buy or such and buy a computer. When they used to see the Macbook Air and the Pro, both in 13 inch, side by side, they would pay extra for the Pro version because 100 or 200 dollars more for something called "Pro" sounds like a nice deal. So the sales on those were actually, very good. Also, the "Touch Bar" was a nice gimmick to help on sales.
Apple uses the "Pro" moniker to denote their top-of-the-range; obviously, they are not aimed at pros only! That would be silly. The chips mark the level of "pro", so M3 is the base for ultrabooks like the MB Pro 14 M3 (and MB Pro Air M2). The "M3 Pro" and "M3 Max" chips are for the professional classes.
Thing is though, it probably doesn’t matter to those people because an M1 Air is probably overkill for Their needs even. If you don’t know enough to know you need the extras, you probably don’t care.
@@AZisk I don’t think that the mbp is a better option than the upcoming mba. At least when it comes to the average consumer. The M1 offers more than enough power, hence the M3 will surpass it. The M3 mba will kind of be a more powerful, and even more efficient chip, and I’d rather pay ~1.200$ to 1.300$ for a laptop with practically the same chip, same RAM and no fan (which wouldn’t be used anyways as we’re speaking of average consumers).
They reduced the memory bus width on the model that uses the 36gb/96gb models from 512 bit to 384 bit hence the new memory config.. certainly going to be something to test
I think it is because instead of using 4 4GB modules (4 x 4gb = 16gb), they are now using 3 6gb modules to save some money. So even though the capacity went up (3 x 6gb = 18gb), the bandwidth went down because there are now less modules..
For me the main question is - will it (with a SW-update to the Apple hypervisor) do nested hypervisors or Metal/GPU in Docker/VMs? If yes, I probably will be spending a lot of money again for upgrading (hoped the M2 would do it and just got more RAM with it). But not very hopeful for this ... The 128GB/1TB M3 Max probably is a "complete beast" for llama2-70B or similar (M2 Max does 7 token/s on Q4), but maybe a future Mac Studio is good enough or better per $.
Nested virtualization is technically possible as of the M2. It's up to Apple to expose the feature so that companies like Parallels can access it. Asahi Linux announced that they have it working. It is also holding me back from upgrading from Intel. I'm hoping that bootcamp comes back too. With the Qualcomm exclusivity deal ending in 2024, perhaps it isn't such a far fetched idea...
I recently bought and returned m2 max because of lacking support for nested virtualization. It couldnt run android emulator in vs 2022.(parallel windows).
@@schnitzle908 right, makes sense. But why not run docker on the mac directly? I see windows VMs only for stuff that doesn’t run on mac tho, but I guess some people have other reasons for using it.
Interesting on your comment on the Air and it’s potential placement. Had been considering one. I will have to watch your video on the thermals. Now you have me considering this M3 model…well maybe. I like the lower weight of the 13” Air.
I think a big part of it is Apple to keep themselves with a good reputation with AI. As one of the main tech companies without their own LLM, they pivoted to say ‘build your own LLM using our new M3 Max chip’
The first L stands for large. So I don't think that's happening on any consumer or enthusiast grade hardware anytime soon. Didn't GPT3 use up somewhere between couple to tens of million dollars worth of computation time?
@@randomnobody660 currently partial inference is already feasible in consumer hardware (albeit workststion grade). Full inference for llm is not financially feasible anyway even for medium and some large company, so the LLM they mention mostlikely using pretrained existing model or partial inference model. Just to experiment on edge case and build MPV, before deploying on full scale compute
For someone moving from a 2015 Intel MacBook Pro, it sounds like the best bet might be to look for Pro M1 or M2 sales for Black Friday /Cyber Monday. Correct? This is for web development, not cranking video editing.
For web dev a macbook air M1 will be great. The change from intel to apple m family is incredible. And you don’t need extra gpu from M2 Pro and M2 Max. And no need ray tracing or dynamic cashing or anything from M3. I suggest getting a MacBook Air M2 16GB RAM or a base MacBook Pro M3 with 16GB RAM if you want to play some games on the side or want the better screen and ports and more external displays.
I just checked and you can get an Apple refurbished Macbook Pro M1 16" with 512GB, 16GB, and 10 CPU cores for $1839... the closest M3 comparison will run you $2499 with 18GB and 12 CPU cores, same storage. So, if you are just using it for software development, saving $660 is probably the prudent option.
@@PKperformanceEU My M1 machine builds my Xcode and Android projects in less than 5 seconds. I don't think dropping that down to 3 seconds is going to improve my developer experience in any meaningful way.
i’m on an M1 mac mini with only 8 GB and i get memory issues many times a day and the force quit is prompted telling me to shut down apps at least once a day. i don’t think there’s any thermal issues, i just have too many tabs open in safari and firefox and offer need a dozen different apps open for my work. if i’m just in CAD or one Adobe app i’m ok but general work or study with lots of apps and dozens of papers open in browsers well then 8 GB cutting it, every day issue.
One of the best videos I have watched covering the necessary details. The end was very valuable. M3 is best for those who will experience the most gain in computing power and efficiency which would be M1 generation and before. And like Alex said, even with some M1 models, you may not need the upgrade.
I have never bought mac before? but I have been looking to buy a good laptop. I keep lots of tabs. I like to just pack my laptop without shutdown. I use docker a lot. I also want to be able to run large language models locally. Should I buy M3 or m2 or another laptop.
Hmm I got the 14 with m3 max with 16core and 40 gpu cores … you can max it in the upgrade section. Like you i took 64gb (but only one Tb / I’ll use external SSDs) hope it’s going to be enough to run descent models
Best Buy took M2 pro 14” out of the line up 😢 I just got the M2 a couple weeks ago and it is not working as fast as my M1 w/touchbar. I want to exchange it to get another one and of course they don’t have any on the lineup. It looks like I might have to get the M3 just to get rid of this M2 that’s not working, right.
I have the thought that Apple has noticed that rivals are on the horizon and had a little tizzy over this. They could've waited for the N3E node but went for the awkward option. Not everything in this world is rational.
Of course they could and should have waited, but hey - this is Apple and awkdward is a new normal. 8GB RAM and single display in PRO machine :D at lest they could have just called it "MacBook".
The M3 was already delayed by a year, and Apple decided that they just had to roll them out, whatever. Bearing in mind the latest sales show a 40% drop in sales, then they would be silly to delay, especially with the holiday season coming. This was an obvious move for any business.
They never cares about competitors, just check the Snapdragon X Elite, they didn't even dare to show you a comparison between M2 Max, they only compared their chip against the M2 Pro what has 2 less power cores.. so even if the 8/10 power cores on M2 Max is better like the Snapdragon X Elite (if it's not they should also show a result comparison on their event..), the 10/12 power cores on M3 Max will be way better, and also tje M3 is avaliabke in a week, but Snapdragon still onky avaliable in 2024 (when we already will see the M4 rumors about their benchmarks)
Minimum of 16 RAM+512gb ssd is good enough to run all kinds of projects. For chips you dont need any max chips mobile app development does not need that much computation power. Maybe any chips M2, M2 pro, M3, M3 pro
Can only hope more developers start focusing on macOS for gaming as even though Mac might be making a push for gaming the devs have got to play a part in it as well
The problem is that Apple have never supported games developers and actively discouraged them on its hardware except for mobile devices. The M3 is only incrementally faster than the M2 and the GPU isn’t really comparable to PC GPUs so there is little incentive for devs to spend time and money porting to OSX. If you can afford the M3 max MacBook Pro you can certainly afford a PS5 which would be a far better gaming platform.
@@Stabby666 I mean Apple could just spend 1 billion dollars for developers to focus on creating games for Mac OS and it would be literally nothing for apple.
Not going to happen. Apple needs to support the frameworks that developers use on other platforms rather than trying to get developers to port to Apple’s playground. Developing for MacOS in general is a pain because the IDE sucks and just gets worse with every iteration but Apple doesn’t care. Leaving obj-c for Swift was a big mistake as well since games on the other platform are developed in C++ and C#.
@@HUSTLEONLY-kz5bf yeah they could have done it years ago but they have no interest in the gaming market. I know of nobody in real life who cares about games on their Apple computers. They either have gaming PCs or consoles for that. I do the same - I have a MacBook Pro I only use for email and light web browsing when out and about, and a PC for work and gaming, along with a PS5.
I have the 16” intel MacBook from 2019 with 1 T of storage. I use it mostly for very basic stuff. Would I even see a difference with this new M3? Thanks.
I can definitely say 100% yes. even if you don’t do anything with it, but leave it on, you’ll notice a big difference because the intel machine will die in a couple hours, but the silicon one will go all day
Should I buy the new MacbookPro M3 Max or the Mac Studio M2 Ultra? In some Geekbench tests, I've read that the new M3 achieves similar results to the M2 Ultra. What makes more sense at the moment? Portability doesn't matter, speed and performance are crucial. I'm looking forward to your recommendations. Thank you
Funny how The 14” mackbook pro with M3 pro chip has less cpu gpu cores 1, 4 respectively and 25% less memory bandwidth than the previous m2 pro, with the discounts for m2 pro not being the new one and the downgrades of the new m3 pro model that would probably only be 10% faster but % wise more expensive than the m2 pro M2 pro its way better value
For Web Dev: M1 is fine. For Xcode: M3 probalby 10% faster. M3 Pro 12cpu. Vs 8. M3 Max 16 cpu. More cpu = faster compilation time. For ML or Game Dev: M3 Max is a beast
The most important decision for me regarding the M1 Pro or Max is the number of external monitors. Just one external monitor on the non-pro version is too limited for me.
Interestingly, memory throughput distribution between available options is noticably different compared to M2 line. You now get 150 gb/s for many options, and 400 gb/s only for some top options. In M2 line there were 200 and 400, and, if I remeber correctly, 400 was the case for all M2 Max options. What I'm trying to say is that if you upgrade to M3 with everything else the same, you may find out that you got worse memory speed (like we saw this with SSD speeds)
Same thinking on my part. Definitely need at least 36GB/2TB. Remember, we can’t upgrade the SSD so you’re stuck with whatever you buy. My 2015 came with 512GB, upgraded it to 1TB a few years ago and then upgraded again to 2TB last year. No external SSD will be as fast as the internal one.
@@adredy 18 would be enough today but this would be a final pre-retirement purchase that I would plan to use for 7 or more years. If I could pick any amount then I’d probably choose 24. I’m not even a developer. It’s a hobby/interest. If I can get 50 lines of code to compile, I get all excited.
@@nunuvyurbiz123 Same thought process for me as well. I could live with 24GB but it’s not offered in the M3 models. 16GB is barely working for me these days since I use Parallels for Windows and Ubuntu Linux and 18GB wouldn’t be much better. I use massive FPGA design tools that don’t run under MacOS so I’m forced to run Windows and/or Linux via Parallels. These tools are memory hogs so 36GB it is.
My 2019 MBP was struggle-bussing since Ventura so I just picked up a 16in M1 Pro with 64gb ram and 2tb for $1700. I hope its worth it over picking up an M3 Pro.... and also hope I didn't get scammed.
Im using a workstation to do game dev on unreal engine. My M1 MacBook Pro just can’t handle it, both from a performance perspective as well as the fact that some specific technologies like the Lumen lighting system and the Nanite mesh system don’t work correctly. The M3 seems like it could be an answer for this. Either way hardware accelerated ray tracing will be nice
Apple keep building incredible hardware nerfed by software and company policy. MacOS is _okay_ but, by design, you can't do much on it. Gaming will not happen until Apple support existing gaming APIs or until Apple silicon devices support Linux with Vulcan. Apple wants to force developers to do everything using Apple technologies and they won't budge on that, even if that means no games
Can you please elaborate which Linux OS do you use? For how long? How do you keep it updated and not lose something? Im a fullstack engineer and basically like MacOS because it simply works nicely without any heating and noise I've used Linux especially in college where I used multiple OS on same machine with partitioning but have always struggled with sudo apt-get update So now I don't want to risk everything with a single update and want something like stable OS
Haha same spec as me, into a 49" Samsung and MX keys/mouse. I have a base model 14" M1 Pro for coding on the go, honestly can't generally tell any performance difference between my Mac's on the day to day
@@AZisk great coder minds think alike! Doesn't miss a beat, iterm2, vscode, chrome inspect tools, lm studio and sequel ace along with the usual Spotify / slack / mail and just powers along. Keen to go M2 15" MBA for my floater and sell off the 14" MBP whilst I can still get good money for it.
If you’re getting by on a 2013 MBP intel, any M series will blow it out of the water. I’m on an M2 pro mac mini, only because I’m a developer (mainly running servers, and vms) so I need the extra RAM. Youd probly be fine on a base spec imo. But it depends on what you’re doing. Edit: I find apples naming is pretty accurate. Get a pro processor if you’re a professional, and a Max/Ultra if you’re on the bleeding edge. Most people only need the base spec and an external drive for storage.
First, you need all the games from Steam that are made for Windows to work on Macs. While they are not available on Macs, buying a MacBook with Apple Silicon looks doubtful to me. On a MacBook with Intel, I can easily run Windows or Linux. And now this is not available on new Macs :(
Lol.. even the iPhone chip runs those games better.. the full console version of Resident Evil Village runs wih 45-30fps on 1560x720 rendering resolution.. and even the basic M chip is a doubled version of that A chip.. (doubled amount of power cores and doubled amount of GPU cores), and if the M3 Max has 40GPU cores compared to the 6GPU cores in the iPhone.. so if you play in fullHD thatbis only doubling the requirements (about 1million pixels in 720p, and about 2 million poxels in 1080p..), but with almost 7x more cores.. so the stablen 120fps is abpiece of cake.. (30-45fps x 3,5 - half of the 7x amount of cores because of the 2 million pixels instead of 1 million pixels in the rendering resolution)
Thank you for the video. It helped me decide my choice. I will choose the M3 Max as an ML engineer. I need the best performance for heavy duties. Yes, it is expensive, but it is considered a good investment with a stronger chip.
Depends a lot on your workflow. For most people memory latency is more important than memory bandwidth. M3 is a new process so it should have improved latency. In other words, unless you're one of the few who can saturate that much bandwidth, the memory performance is probably better not worse, since latency affects everybody.
Man, no conspiracy, but, for this amount of "cpu variants", as 3 Nm N3E process is not launched yet, probably is being done in the 3 Nm N3B process... That is famous for not "getting there", in other words, all those CPUs e GPUs variants. As far as I could learn, the goal is for the maximum number of performance cores as possible. Those odd numbers of cores and more or same amount of efficient cores, is just problematic in my opinion. And also, why are they using those 6 GB Memory chips? 18 GB?
Apple was undoubtedly constrained by the low yield of N3B, meaning more cores equals even lower yields, so they have had to do their best. The N3E will not be ready for another year, so clearly, they could not delay again. As for RAM, 6GB modules are the new normal, so that is why the M3 MB Pro 14/16 have 18GB as the base config. The base M3 MB Pro 14 gets leftover stock of the 4GB modules, which will likely be a lot due to poor sales in 2023.
Also so glad found your channel. Practical everyday professional work usage instead of fluffy media "I make UA-cam videos, are you not entertained?" I'm pretty sure the MacBook Air is a practical device for a lot of work situations despite not having a fan....
I'm currently running the last intel MacBook Pro (the one from 2020). I'm considering finally getting the upgrade. Though depending on reviews, I might end up settling with an M2 series model. I heard a certain UA-camr might have second-hand laptops?
I was able to get the 1640 configuration in a 14 inch form factor, didn’t buy it, but did add it to the cart. Just to try. It’s just not one of the base configurations so you have to drill through the configurator, but if you want it, it is possible.
Stopping aty 1:42 to see if we have the same opinion, I'll edit it to finish this comment once I've finished the video. I don't think it's weird of them comparing to M1 either - nor do I think it was them trying to just show "bigger numbers" to give off any specific impression. I think it's simply because the M2 launch wasn't as huge as they wanted/hoped since so many people were still happy with their M1 products. That's me, using my M1 Max 14" for professional iOS development and never running into hardware bottlenecks or issues. I'm content with my laptop for this use. I am developing a game in UE5 where my laptop is STRUGGLING to handle, and while the M3 is tempting for this reason I don't think it would be the wisest choice for me. I think simply building a PC with dedicated graphics will be the wiser choice for game dev despite their improvements in M3 for this. I'll be keeping my M1 Max for everything else outside of game dev, and not upgrading for a while to come. Long story short, I think the comparison to M1 for M3 was because it was targeting those like my who have and didn't upgrade. Edit: Similar thoughts, although you mentioned intel as well as M1. I forgot intel was even a thing for mac users for a moment there lol
I was disappointed they didn't offer a M3Pro in the 24" iMac or finally deliver the M3Pro in a 27/32' model. Also, I wonder what's going to happen to the 15" Air. I see Microcenter already has it at $170 off list and the mac mini base model is 10% off list. I am typing this on a 16" M1 base model (16GB Ram/512GB SSD) which I won't be changing anytime soon. I am a moderate load user and don't need the processing power. If the 15" Air had gotten the M3Pro chipset it might have been a different story.
the apple website is misleading when it comes to skus. its only a $200 upgrade to the 12 core... on the website version they add in the 1tb of ssd storage which you cant remove unless you use the apple store app.
It only have Wifi 6E not WIFI7, which would be really good for connectivity for local network drives. You still need docking station with 10Gbit ethernet.
Can you do another memory torture test with the new M3 MBPs? thanks! Also, 13-inch M1 mbp user here. My workflow surpassed it already. Dying to get the new M3 Pro.
I have the M1 Air, and I was wondering if it is worth upgrading to the M3 Pro. Do you recommend that change? I use my MacBook for computer science in university, and I use virtual machines to run Windows for certain programs. My MacBook Air gets hot, and the RAM pressure becomes yellow.
personally i'd say go buy an M2 Pro Mac with at least 32gb of RAM (refurbished/used) to save some money, I assume you have 16gb on your Air. If you use anymore than 32gb of RAM, M3 Max OR save some money by going with an Intel/AMD Ryzen PC.
@@formerlycringe Yes, I have the MBA with 16gb. I watch some videos and some UA-camrs said that 16 and 32 gb of ram had the same performance. Do had the chance to test the 32gb?
@@lucassotomayor05 performance is the same but if you need more RAM for VMs and other tasks, don't leave windows laptops out, you just might benefit from going to Windows
Could not comment on official Apple introduction video because they have it disabled, but I wanted to say, thank you for all your hard efforts but I'll stick to my M1 Pro probably for years
Im a cloud security student. I run a lot of vm's. Im thinking about getting a m2 mac mini. Do you think thats a good idea? If not what would you suggest. Thanks in Advance! Love your videos
Apple should fix Xcode first, 15.0 has linker issues and after weeks it’s not possible to use Sonoma for production purposes yet! What’s the point of betas and release candidates?
JOIN: youtube.com/@azisk/join
You can get the 16core max in the 14 inch you just have to upgrade it in the options 6:35
Yes I came to the comments to point this out too
Yep… I got it on the 14” as well.
but not 40gpu core one
@@村のアホ yes 40 core it’s a 300 dollar upgrade after you click buy
@@村のアホ - you can configure a 14" Max with 16 CPU cores and 40 GPU cores - I just did it! 💰
@Alex Ziskind At 6:39, you're wrong on the 14" not being able to max out compared to the 16" models.
You can manually upgrade it to be similar to the 16" models, it's just that they don't show that at the summary.
Came here to say this
to everyone feeling like the M2 macbook pros were just released and now we are getting new ones again, you aren't crazy. apple delayed the m2 release from last year until january of this year, that is why this release seems too soon. if you can afford the new shiny macbooks go for it, but going with a M1 generation isn't a bad choice either
thanks for reviewing these expensive mac units and helps us gauge if we really need an update as software developers. Your test and comparison helps, keep it up and blessings always^
I have a M1 Max 64gb of ram and i still max it out with my vm workflows. Didn’t make sense for a m2 update but a max ram m3 is very compelling.
Plus you get more cores on the Max while previous models it was just the extra GPUs
Same here. I use my M1 Max 64GB for VM & ML tasks. I recently started hitting the unified memory limits & to a lesser extent the CPU limits. Just this past week while running an LLM my M1 Max started swapping GBs out; As such I will be upgrading.
I do appreciate you making these videos Alex! I remember talking with you about NativeScript some time ago, and you making this shift to youtube in order to review products. It was a great transition and you’re really good at it. I love watching down to detail videos like yours with specific comparisons especially us being developers hearing this from a fellow developer with engineering mindset ❤
wow you’ve been around for a while! thanks for your continued interest and the kind words!
Phew 😅 was worried if M3’s supported VS code 😜
I mean, I’m just guessing the new machines will run VS Code. Will need good hard data to really test it out
About the new "Base Model", I was reading a report on that. Not every consumer watch a UA-camr or read about it online. They just go to best buy or such and buy a computer. When they used to see the Macbook Air and the Pro, both in 13 inch, side by side, they would pay extra for the Pro version because 100 or 200 dollars more for something called "Pro" sounds like a nice deal. So the sales on those were actually, very good. Also, the "Touch Bar" was a nice gimmick to help on sales.
yes, this makes sense. also, in this case the base mbp is actually a better option than the mba IMO
Apple uses the "Pro" moniker to denote their top-of-the-range; obviously, they are not aimed at pros only! That would be silly. The chips mark the level of "pro", so M3 is the base for ultrabooks like the MB Pro 14 M3 (and MB Pro Air M2). The "M3 Pro" and "M3 Max" chips are for the professional classes.
Thing is though, it probably doesn’t matter to those people because an M1 Air is probably overkill for Their needs even. If you don’t know enough to know you need the extras, you probably don’t care.
@@AZisk I don’t think that the mbp is a better option than the upcoming mba. At least when it comes to the average consumer. The M1 offers more than enough power, hence the M3 will surpass it. The M3 mba will kind of be a more powerful, and even more efficient chip, and I’d rather pay ~1.200$ to 1.300$ for a laptop with practically the same chip, same RAM and no fan (which wouldn’t be used anyways as we’re speaking of average consumers).
They reduced the memory bus width on the model that uses the 36gb/96gb models from 512 bit to 384 bit hence the new memory config.. certainly going to be something to test
I think it is because instead of using 4 4GB modules (4 x 4gb = 16gb), they are now using 3 6gb modules to save some money. So even though the capacity went up (3 x 6gb = 18gb), the bandwidth went down because there are now less modules..
For me the main question is - will it (with a SW-update to the Apple hypervisor) do nested hypervisors or Metal/GPU in Docker/VMs? If yes, I probably will be spending a lot of money again for upgrading (hoped the M2 would do it and just got more RAM with it). But not very hopeful for this ...
The 128GB/1TB M3 Max probably is a "complete beast" for llama2-70B or similar (M2 Max does 7 token/s on Q4), but maybe a future Mac Studio is good enough or better per $.
Nested virtualization is technically possible as of the M2. It's up to Apple to expose the feature so that companies like Parallels can access it. Asahi Linux announced that they have it working.
It is also holding me back from upgrading from Intel. I'm hoping that bootcamp comes back too. With the Qualcomm exclusivity deal ending in 2024, perhaps it isn't such a far fetched idea...
Curious why you’d need this? I do use VMs sporadically but never even considered nesting them.
I recently bought and returned m2 max because of lacking support for nested virtualization. It couldnt run android emulator in vs 2022.(parallel windows).
@@svenmify If you are running something like Windows and want to use WSL for things like Docker, then you need nested virtualization.
@@schnitzle908 right, makes sense. But why not run docker on the mac directly? I see windows VMs only for stuff that doesn’t run on mac tho, but I guess some people have other reasons for using it.
While games were high in their considerations, they are likely targeting VR development.
definitely!
Interesting on your comment on the Air and it’s potential placement. Had been considering one. I will have to watch your video on the thermals. Now you have me considering this M3 model…well maybe. I like the lower weight of the 13” Air.
I think a big part of it is Apple to keep themselves with a good reputation with AI. As one of the main tech companies without their own LLM, they pivoted to say ‘build your own LLM using our new M3 Max chip’
The first L stands for large. So I don't think that's happening on any consumer or enthusiast grade hardware anytime soon.
Didn't GPT3 use up somewhere between couple to tens of million dollars worth of computation time?
@@randomnobody660 currently partial inference is already feasible in consumer hardware (albeit workststion grade). Full inference for llm is not financially feasible anyway even for medium and some large company, so the LLM they mention mostlikely using pretrained existing model or partial inference model. Just to experiment on edge case and build MPV, before deploying on full scale compute
This video randomly showed up on my UA-cam and I’m just shocked at how good your mic is lol
thx
For someone moving from a 2015 Intel MacBook Pro, it sounds like the best bet might be to look for Pro M1 or M2 sales for Black Friday /Cyber Monday. Correct? This is for web development, not cranking video editing.
For web dev a macbook air M1 will be great. The change from intel to apple m family is incredible. And you don’t need extra gpu from M2 Pro and M2 Max. And no need ray tracing or dynamic cashing or anything from M3.
I suggest getting a MacBook Air M2 16GB RAM or a base MacBook Pro M3 with 16GB RAM if you want to play some games on the side or want the better screen and ports and more external displays.
@@PatricioBenavente Will an M1 Air handle a pile of Docker containers and Figma/Photoshop without struggling?
@@RichardTafoya I never use Docker. And don’t use Photoshop. Figma struggles on 8 GB, but with 16GB never have a problem
I have a question, for me just a beginner in Machine learning and Data Science, do I need to get the M3 Pro or Just M2 Pro?
I just checked and you can get an Apple refurbished Macbook Pro M1 16" with 512GB, 16GB, and 10 CPU cores for $1839... the closest M3 comparison will run you $2499 with 18GB and 12 CPU cores, same storage. So, if you are just using it for software development, saving $660 is probably the prudent option.
@@PKperformanceEU My M1 machine builds my Xcode and Android projects in less than 5 seconds. I don't think dropping that down to 3 seconds is going to improve my developer experience in any meaningful way.
Correction - you can get the maxed out 14 inch version, it’s not exclusive to the 16 inch
Those of us who do 3D work NEED the raytracing cores in this thing.
i’m on an M1 mac mini with only 8 GB and i get memory issues many times a day and the force quit is prompted telling me to shut down apps at least once a day. i don’t think there’s any thermal issues, i just have too many tabs open in safari and firefox and offer need a dozen different apps open for my work. if i’m just in CAD or one Adobe app i’m ok but general work or study with lots of apps and dozens of papers open in browsers well then 8 GB cutting it, every day issue.
For your workflow, 8GB wasn't a good choice. I recommend 24GB.
you said the magic word: Adobe. Those apps will much up your memory and lock up your system quick!
Loved the vid man!! Keep it up!!
thx!
I’m a game dev and wondering how powerful m3 pro GPU is compared to 3050ti laptop edition.
I think that the statement “it is for the people who like shiny new objects” is the most accurate description of those preordering this 😁
What about people those who are buying from intel windows!?🥲
I think a Raspberry PI can run VSCode. One would hope M3 can do too.
I really like you to put Max Tech and he did to you too 😂
Have been holding off upgrading my 2018 MBP despite it sounding like a jet fighter when just browsing.
Think it’s finally time to upgrade
oh you will really appreciate it. i remember the 2018 model very well
One of the best videos I have watched covering the necessary details. The end was very valuable. M3 is best for those who will experience the most gain in computing power and efficiency which would be M1 generation and before. And like Alex said, even with some M1 models, you may not need the upgrade.
I have never bought mac before? but I have been looking to buy a good laptop.
I keep lots of tabs. I like to just pack my laptop without shutdown. I use docker a lot. I also want to be able to run large language models locally.
Should I buy M3 or m2 or another laptop.
MacBook Pro M3 Max if you can afford it. MacBook Air M1 16GB if you wanna save some money
Hmm I got the 14 with m3 max with 16core and 40 gpu cores … you can max it in the upgrade section. Like you i took 64gb (but only one Tb / I’ll use external SSDs) hope it’s going to be enough to run descent models
How has the 14 inch M3 Max treated you with your workflow? Runs descent models? Worth the price?
Can't wait for your tests with these machines. Please don't forget to also run a tensor flow comparison 😊
Best Buy took M2 pro 14” out of the line up 😢
I just got the M2 a couple weeks ago and it is not working as fast as my M1 w/touchbar. I want to exchange it to get another one and of course they don’t have any on the lineup. It looks like I might have to get the M3 just to get rid of this M2 that’s not working, right.
I have the thought that Apple has noticed that rivals are on the horizon and had a little tizzy over this. They could've waited for the N3E node but went for the awkward option. Not everything in this world is rational.
Of course they could and should have waited, but hey - this is Apple and awkdward is a new normal. 8GB RAM and single display in PRO machine :D at lest they could have just called it "MacBook".
The M3 was already delayed by a year, and Apple decided that they just had to roll them out, whatever. Bearing in mind the latest sales show a 40% drop in sales, then they would be silly to delay, especially with the holiday season coming. This was an obvious move for any business.
They never cares about competitors, just check the Snapdragon X Elite, they didn't even dare to show you a comparison between M2 Max, they only compared their chip against the M2 Pro what has 2 less power cores.. so even if the 8/10 power cores on M2 Max is better like the Snapdragon X Elite (if it's not they should also show a result comparison on their event..), the 10/12 power cores on M3 Max will be way better, and also tje M3 is avaliabke in a week, but Snapdragon still onky avaliable in 2024 (when we already will see the M4 rumors about their benchmarks)
This channel is on fire! So happy to discover. This is the most realistic review
What about the M3 in the iMac ? Would it be great for Android Studio? (Flutter Dev)
Which RAM to take ?
Minimum of 16 RAM+512gb ssd is good enough to run all kinds of projects.
For chips you dont need any max chips mobile app development does not need that much computation power. Maybe any chips M2, M2 pro, M3, M3 pro
iMac seems good and 10k INR lesser than MacBook Pro with 16gb/512gb config.
Consider all factors like portability
Can only hope more developers start focusing on macOS for gaming as even though Mac might be making a push for gaming the devs have got to play a part in it as well
still trash. you cant out develop trash.
The problem is that Apple have never supported games developers and actively discouraged them on its hardware except for mobile devices. The M3 is only incrementally faster than the M2 and the GPU isn’t really comparable to PC GPUs so there is little incentive for devs to spend time and money porting to OSX. If you can afford the M3 max MacBook Pro you can certainly afford a PS5 which would be a far better gaming platform.
@@Stabby666 I mean Apple could just spend 1 billion dollars for developers to focus on creating games for Mac OS and it would be literally nothing for apple.
Not going to happen. Apple needs to support the frameworks that developers use on other platforms rather than trying to get developers to port to Apple’s playground. Developing for MacOS in general is a pain because the IDE sucks and just gets worse with every iteration but Apple doesn’t care. Leaving obj-c for Swift was a big mistake as well since games on the other platform are developed in C++ and C#.
@@HUSTLEONLY-kz5bf yeah they could have done it years ago but they have no interest in the gaming market. I know of nobody in real life who cares about games on their Apple computers. They either have gaming PCs or consoles for that. I do the same - I have a MacBook Pro I only use for email and light web browsing when out and about, and a PC for work and gaming, along with a PS5.
Why you order each model? You gonna send them back as used machines?
I have the 16” intel
MacBook from 2019 with 1 T of storage. I use it mostly for very basic stuff. Would I even see a difference with this new M3?
Thanks.
I can definitely say 100% yes. even if you don’t do anything with it, but leave it on, you’ll notice a big difference because the intel machine will die in a couple hours, but the silicon one will go all day
@@AZisk Thank you. Just can’t justify spending another $4000 Cad , just 4 years later.
Should I buy the new MacbookPro M3 Max or the Mac Studio M2 Ultra? In some Geekbench tests, I've read that the new M3 achieves similar results to the M2 Ultra. What makes more sense at the moment? Portability doesn't matter, speed and performance are crucial. I'm looking forward to your recommendations. Thank you
Wait for the M3 Ultra
Funny how The 14” mackbook pro with M3 pro chip has less cpu gpu cores 1, 4 respectively and 25% less memory bandwidth than the previous m2 pro,
with the discounts for m2 pro not being the new one and the downgrades of the new m3 pro model that would probably only be 10% faster but % wise more expensive than the m2 pro
M2 pro its way better value
The easting is in pudding. I think will likely depend on your use case.
It's about yield on the 3nm process apparently.
I would wait for tests as basing on specs is a fools game as there is more to just core count and bandwidth.
Is it worth upgrading to this from a maxed out 15” M1 Max (64GB RAM, 4TB SSD) or not really?
For Web Dev: M1 is fine.
For Xcode: M3 probalby 10% faster. M3 Pro 12cpu. Vs 8. M3 Max 16 cpu. More cpu = faster compilation time.
For ML or Game Dev: M3 Max is a beast
You mean mbp 16” M1 Max. 15” mba came with M2
Can anyone make me some examples of ML work that would require the 128 Gb of RAM?
Or other uses for them?
please do some multithreaded testing
The most important decision for me regarding the M1 Pro or Max is the number of external monitors. Just one external monitor on the non-pro version is too limited for me.
It is not hard to get two monitors with a dual HDMI hub that will support a displaylink driver
@@bryandata6658 but why artificial need for gimmicks? Also displaylink SUCKS.
Any chance to straighten the youtube plaque?🤣
Did not expected to see Max here 😂😂😂😂XD
I was thinking about using a Mac for LLMs beause of the RAM. But it seems LLMs still run slow on them compared to a PC with Nvidia GPU.
massive upgrade on macbook 16" for a less than a year release? geez, just bought mine few months ago
Interestingly, memory throughput distribution between available options is noticably different compared to M2 line. You now get 150 gb/s for many options, and 400 gb/s only for some top options. In M2 line there were 200 and 400, and, if I remeber correctly, 400 was the case for all M2 Max options. What I'm trying to say is that if you upgrade to M3 with everything else the same, you may find out that you got worse memory speed (like we saw this with SSD speeds)
Should programmers go for M3 or M3
pro?
I'd be curious to see Xcode benchmarks. I have an M1 Pro 16" with 16/1TB, thinking of upgrading to the M3 Pro 16" with 36/2TB.
Same thinking on my part. Definitely need at least 36GB/2TB. Remember, we can’t upgrade the SSD so you’re stuck with whatever you buy. My 2015 came with 512GB, upgraded it to 1TB a few years ago and then upgraded again to 2TB last year. No external SSD will be as fast as the internal one.
can i ask for what you need 36gb of ram ?
@@adredy 18 would be enough today but this would be a final pre-retirement purchase that I would plan to use for 7 or more years. If I could pick any amount then I’d probably choose 24. I’m not even a developer. It’s a hobby/interest. If I can get 50 lines of code to compile, I get all excited.
@@nunuvyurbiz123 Same thought process for me as well. I could live with 24GB but it’s not offered in the M3 models. 16GB is barely working for me these days since I use Parallels for Windows and Ubuntu Linux and 18GB wouldn’t be much better. I use massive FPGA design tools that don’t run under MacOS so I’m forced to run Windows and/or Linux via Parallels. These tools are memory hogs so 36GB it is.
My 2019 MBP was struggle-bussing since Ventura so I just picked up a 16in M1 Pro with 64gb ram and 2tb for $1700. I hope its worth it over picking up an M3 Pro.... and also hope I didn't get scammed.
Errr, don't think the M1 Pro chip has a 64gb option. That's a M1 Max option.
@@larsc888 yep, just double checked it's a 32GB. I just had 64 GB on the mind.
Im using a workstation to do game dev on unreal engine. My M1 MacBook Pro just can’t handle it, both from a performance perspective as well as the fact that some specific technologies like the Lumen lighting system and the Nanite mesh system don’t work correctly. The M3 seems like it could be an answer for this. Either way hardware accelerated ray tracing will be nice
Apple keep building incredible hardware nerfed by software and company policy.
MacOS is _okay_ but, by design, you can't do much on it. Gaming will not happen until Apple support existing gaming APIs or until Apple silicon devices support Linux with Vulcan.
Apple wants to force developers to do everything using Apple technologies and they won't budge on that, even if that means no games
Yes, it's very frustrating :(
"MacOS is okay but, by design, you can't do much on it."
@@TheDanEdwards people do with OS more than run farting Apps.
Sir do we need these? What if using cloud computing azure??
Can you please elaborate which Linux OS do you use? For how long? How do you keep it updated and not lose something?
Im a fullstack engineer and basically like MacOS because it simply works nicely without any heating and noise
I've used Linux especially in college where I used multiple OS on same machine with partitioning but have always struggled with sudo apt-get update
So now I don't want to risk everything with a single update and want something like stable OS
I use Ubuntu - it handles everything I need and it’s as out of the box ready as I could find
@@AZisk thanks for replying
Scary fast and scary expensive!
I just bought 16 inch m3 pro base model since I needed one tired of intel PC shutting after 2 hours of work, lets see how it compare
I'd love to see how your 16 inch M3 Max runs games in Parallels with it's new GPU.
😑 idk, we’ll see
gpt-3.5-turbo has 20B parameters, so I guess we can run a lot good LLMs locally on macbook now?
yeah. i made a video on running llama 2 recently
Sitting here with my M1 Max Studio with 32 gpu cores and 64gig of ram, and still looking like I got a few more years left before needing an upgrade. ❤
Haha same spec as me, into a 49" Samsung and MX keys/mouse. I have a base model 14" M1 Pro for coding on the go, honestly can't generally tell any performance difference between my Mac's on the day to day
that was the same model i bought. it’s a beast
@@AZisk great coder minds think alike! Doesn't miss a beat, iterm2, vscode, chrome inspect tools, lm studio and sequel ace along with the usual Spotify / slack / mail and just powers along. Keen to go M2 15" MBA for my floater and sell off the 14" MBP whilst I can still get good money for it.
Where can I buy your second hand MacBook Pro Alex! Would be an honor!
And I'm so indecisive about Wich iPhone get, 15 pro max or 15 plus, I would like to feel those 120hz
Not that i have money for any "m apple" (or other apple) laptops, but if they had linux support...
Plz do m1 pro vs base m3
Still on 2013 MBP intel and looking to upgrade. Thinking if I should get the new M3 pro or wait for M3 MBA. Thoughts?
If you’re getting by on a 2013 MBP intel, any M series will blow it out of the water. I’m on an M2 pro mac mini, only because I’m a developer (mainly running servers, and vms) so I need the extra RAM. Youd probly be fine on a base spec imo. But it depends on what you’re doing.
Edit: I find apples naming is pretty accurate. Get a pro processor if you’re a professional, and a Max/Ultra if you’re on the bleeding edge. Most people only need the base spec and an external drive for storage.
I really don't want to think what will happen if you enable raytracing in games while playing on mac. 180 °F , throttling and 5 FPS
First, you need all the games from Steam that are made for Windows to work on Macs. While they are not available on Macs, buying a MacBook with Apple Silicon looks doubtful to me.
On a MacBook with Intel, I can easily run Windows or Linux. And now this is not available on new Macs :(
Lol.. even the iPhone chip runs those games better.. the full console version of Resident Evil Village runs wih 45-30fps on 1560x720 rendering resolution.. and even the basic M chip is a doubled version of that A chip.. (doubled amount of power cores and doubled amount of GPU cores), and if the M3 Max has 40GPU cores compared to the 6GPU cores in the iPhone.. so if you play in fullHD thatbis only doubling the requirements (about 1million pixels in 720p, and about 2 million poxels in 1080p..), but with almost 7x more cores.. so the stablen 120fps is abpiece of cake.. (30-45fps x 3,5 - half of the 7x amount of cores because of the 2 million pixels instead of 1 million pixels in the rendering resolution)
You can order 14 inch 16/40 cores model. Just click lower, and you will have an upgrade choice.
1:40 hahaha. "Sorry Max" was hilarious
Max hides more benchmarks than the apple
@@MaxPayne-o8f any example that you can share ?
@@MaxPayne-o8fHuh? No he doesn’t he’s a very honest reviewer
Thank you for the video. It helped me decide my choice. I will choose the M3 Max as an ML engineer. I need the best performance for heavy duties. Yes, it is expensive, but it is considered a good investment with a stronger chip.
Hi Alex I have a question, I am going to study NLP for my master. Is it a good choice to get the m3 max with 38gb or m3 pro with 38gb ?
Why did Apple need a new processor? Your alternate ARM chip for windows would answer it.
Not mentioned RAM speeds decrease for M3 Pro - from 200gb/s for M2 Pro to 150gb/s for M3 Pro. But anyway thanks for the video
Depends a lot on your workflow. For most people memory latency is more important than memory bandwidth. M3 is a new process so it should have improved latency. In other words, unless you're one of the few who can saturate that much bandwidth, the memory performance is probably better not worse, since latency affects everybody.
I am waiting for the 0 nanometer version.
I have the m2 pro 14". Do i have to upgrade ?
Man, no conspiracy, but, for this amount of "cpu variants", as 3 Nm N3E process is not launched yet, probably is being done in the 3 Nm N3B process... That is famous for not "getting there", in other words, all those CPUs e GPUs variants. As far as I could learn, the goal is for the maximum number of performance cores as possible. Those odd numbers of cores and more or same amount of efficient cores, is just problematic in my opinion. And also, why are they using those 6 GB Memory chips? 18 GB?
yeah don’t know about all that. I think most people won’t notice a thing
@@AZiskmost people won't notice the jump from M1 to M3 too
Apple was undoubtedly constrained by the low yield of N3B, meaning more cores equals even lower yields, so they have had to do their best. The N3E will not be ready for another year, so clearly, they could not delay again.
As for RAM, 6GB modules are the new normal, so that is why the M3 MB Pro 14/16 have 18GB as the base config. The base M3 MB Pro 14 gets leftover stock of the 4GB modules, which will likely be a lot due to poor sales in 2023.
@@andyH_England thank you for the info, very interesting!
Also so glad found your channel. Practical everyday professional work usage instead of fluffy media "I make UA-cam videos, are you not entertained?" I'm pretty sure the MacBook Air is a practical device for a lot of work situations despite not having a fan....
Please a PyTorch benchmark again.
where's the new mac mini?
I'm currently running the last intel MacBook Pro (the one from 2020). I'm considering finally getting the upgrade. Though depending on reviews, I might end up settling with an M2 series model. I heard a certain UA-camr might have second-hand laptops?
Im a dev and I work on a mac and yes, vs code is my ide. Very accurate observation!
Well, just bought the M2 max MacBook pro a week or two ago
I was able to get the 1640 configuration in a 14 inch form factor, didn’t buy it, but did add it to the cart. Just to try. It’s just not one of the base configurations so you have to drill through the configurator, but if you want it, it is possible.
Stopping aty 1:42 to see if we have the same opinion, I'll edit it to finish this comment once I've finished the video.
I don't think it's weird of them comparing to M1 either - nor do I think it was them trying to just show "bigger numbers" to give off any specific impression. I think it's simply because the M2 launch wasn't as huge as they wanted/hoped since so many people were still happy with their M1 products. That's me, using my M1 Max 14" for professional iOS development and never running into hardware bottlenecks or issues. I'm content with my laptop for this use. I am developing a game in UE5 where my laptop is STRUGGLING to handle, and while the M3 is tempting for this reason I don't think it would be the wisest choice for me. I think simply building a PC with dedicated graphics will be the wiser choice for game dev despite their improvements in M3 for this. I'll be keeping my M1 Max for everything else outside of game dev, and not upgrading for a while to come. Long story short, I think the comparison to M1 for M3 was because it was targeting those like my who have and didn't upgrade.
Edit: Similar thoughts, although you mentioned intel as well as M1. I forgot intel was even a thing for mac users for a moment there lol
I was disappointed they didn't offer a M3Pro in the 24" iMac or finally deliver the M3Pro in a 27/32' model. Also, I wonder what's going to happen to the 15" Air. I see Microcenter already has it at $170 off list and the mac mini base model is 10% off list. I am typing this on a 16" M1 base model (16GB Ram/512GB SSD) which I won't be changing anytime soon. I am a moderate load user and don't need the processing power. If the 15" Air had gotten the M3Pro chipset it might have been a different story.
the apple website is misleading when it comes to skus. its only a $200 upgrade to the 12 core... on the website version they add in the 1tb of ssd storage which you cant remove unless you use the apple store app.
What game dev is being funded on Apple Mac OS?
Dear Alex, Could you please advise which one I should pick ? M2 pro 12 core and M3 pro 12 core. I focus on coding mobile app. Thanks so much
blud spend ten of thousands ++ dollars just for us
and god damn he's cooking it!
It only have Wifi 6E not WIFI7, which would be really good for connectivity for local network drives. You still need docking station with 10Gbit ethernet.
Can you do another memory torture test with the new M3 MBPs? thanks! Also, 13-inch M1 mbp user here. My workflow surpassed it already. Dying to get the new M3 Pro.
I have the M1 Air, and I was wondering if it is worth upgrading to the M3 Pro. Do you recommend that change? I use my MacBook for computer science in university, and I use virtual machines to run Windows for certain programs. My MacBook Air gets hot, and the RAM pressure becomes yellow.
personally i'd say go buy an M2 Pro Mac with at least 32gb of RAM (refurbished/used) to save some money, I assume you have 16gb on your Air.
If you use anymore than 32gb of RAM, M3 Max OR save some money by going with an Intel/AMD Ryzen PC.
@@formerlycringe Yes, I have the MBA with 16gb. I watch some videos and some UA-camrs said that 16 and 32 gb of ram had the same performance. Do had the chance to test the 32gb?
@@lucassotomayor05 performance is the same but if you need more RAM for VMs and other tasks, don't leave windows laptops out, you just might benefit from going to Windows
You've been hilarious. 😄😄 I like it. Keep it that way.
Love your analysis and Mac performance reviews.
Could not comment on official Apple introduction video because they have it disabled, but I wanted to say, thank you for all your hard efforts but I'll stick to my M1 Pro probably for years
I think my m1 16mbp will last another year before I need to upgrade.
Im a cloud security student. I run a lot of vm's. Im thinking about getting a m2 mac mini. Do you think thats a good idea? If not what would you suggest.
Thanks in Advance!
Love your videos
Apple should fix Xcode first, 15.0 has linker issues and after weeks it’s not possible to use Sonoma for production purposes yet! What’s the point of betas and release candidates?
Hey ! I am a college student and want to switch to mac . Can you suggest me one . Data science enthusiast
I feel like they just tweaked the M2 slightly and up the price tag.. idk if its worth it.