India Readies INS Vikrant, Its Newest Aircraft Carrier, To Stand Between China & The Indian Ocean

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 16 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 929

  • @mod.1122
    @mod.1122 3 роки тому +56

    Great respect and love India Navy.
    Support 🇮🇳 from 🇯🇵

  • @callmebob846
    @callmebob846 3 роки тому +276

    As an engineer I'm proud to say that I got the privilege to be a part of the team (as an intern) who has been building this giant beast at Cochin shipyard limited.

    • @upscstudymaterials
      @upscstudymaterials 3 роки тому +11

      Now you will be honey trapped 😂😂😂

    • @jey2275
      @jey2275 3 роки тому +20

      @@upscstudymaterials there is nothing to be honey trapped , bcz it's a 3rd gen carrier , it is no superior weapon . If you say Pakistan they can easily know the details through China which also uses similar dumb carriers , this type of carriers have very limited capabilities when compared to CATOBAR carriers like that of France and US or a large one like that of Britain , these are basically Soviet designs they are shit . Hope the government will consider western design for the next one .

    • @Skywalker622
      @Skywalker622 3 роки тому +5

      @@jey2275 Still one can't be too careful about such matters related to defense. Although i too agree India military has too many rat holes holes in it for enemies to peer through it.

    • @indian-dl6td
      @indian-dl6td 3 роки тому +1

      @@jey2275 there are many crucial details more than catobar and stobar in ac..like arrangement of cabins..

    • @jacky4365
      @jacky4365 3 роки тому +5

      Perfect, it just take 17 years to complete, its really a miracle.

  • @hindustansocialistrepublic5545
    @hindustansocialistrepublic5545 3 роки тому +255

    I would like to make a few corrections
    1)IAC means Indigenous Aircraft Carrier not Indian Aircraft Carrier
    2)Range of INS Vikramaditya is 13,000km+ not 1300km
    3) Chinese Navy's Type 003 are bieng built with Diesel Propulsion System not a Nuclear Reactor

    • @tiaussardar8192
      @tiaussardar8192 3 роки тому +11

      great knowledge, kudos to you.

    • @UwU-dz6ic
      @UwU-dz6ic 3 роки тому +2

      i do not know where the gets this info from probably from wiki

    • @deveshyadav3099
      @deveshyadav3099 3 роки тому +5

      Right!? Their research is bad af…

    • @abin1838
      @abin1838 3 роки тому +15

      Its not confirmed that chinese type 003 carrier is going to use a diesel powered engine. There are speculations from international observers that china is going to power it using nuclear power.If at all its conventional, next 2 carriers may will be nuclear powered. Also china has been working with small modular reactors now.Also they are planning to employ EM launch catapults along with CATOBAR.

    • @abinmohan3675
      @abinmohan3675 3 роки тому +3

      @@abin1838 no, the third Chinese carrier is conventionally powered. The fourth and fifth would be nuclear

  • @deepanshugupta9259
    @deepanshugupta9259 3 роки тому +205

    Blod of ya'll to show HMS Queen Elizabeth and Aircraft carrier Charles De'Gaulle. Instead of real INS Vikrant😅😅

    • @prashantkumar-wk2tu
      @prashantkumar-wk2tu 3 роки тому +10

      Indian biggest weapon CDS Rawat - launching verbal missiles ever now and then 😁 . Wondering why he is there?

    • @faizsamsudin9371
      @faizsamsudin9371 3 роки тому +7

      Why not name a missile after Arnab ? It's the most poisonous barrage of missile sent to any poor person sitting next to him

    • @riturajsingh4581
      @riturajsingh4581 3 роки тому +6

      At least they could show INS Vikram aditya instead of French And British carrier

    • @cat-man5522
      @cat-man5522 3 роки тому +2

      Maybe because there aren't many to show ?

    • @prashantkumar-wk2tu
      @prashantkumar-wk2tu 3 роки тому

      @S R you ass he should have retired long back . I am there because of my parents and u are there because of your mother’s mis adventure. 😀

  • @tamishgoyal5962
    @tamishgoyal5962 3 роки тому +160

    the problem is the budget of india military . more than half is gone in salary . other part in maintainence and then there is only a small amoount left for new equipments . we need to find a way to make them by ourselves and a little cheaper without loosing its quality.

    • @JASHVEER22
      @JASHVEER22 3 роки тому +15

      Pm should crowdfund the financing of new aircraft carrier. PUBLIC paise dega, if they know it is for a national project.

    • @tamishgoyal5962
      @tamishgoyal5962 3 роки тому +39

      @@JASHVEER22 nope... I don't think that's a way to go. People are already paying taxes for it. Also it may create a sense of ki taxes se nhi mila toh public hi de degi. Also, the transparency of crowd funding by govt haven't be great... So I think will just fill the pockets of big people.

    • @ajaykumarsingh702
      @ajaykumarsingh702 3 роки тому +18

      @@JASHVEER22
      LOL !
      There is no news what happened to PM care fund for covid.
      You think people are stupid enough to believe these corrupt politicians anymore ?

    • @souptikpanja3735
      @souptikpanja3735 3 роки тому +8

      yes India lags at $75 billion where as China pushes upto $251 billion

    • @atulkumaryadav8198
      @atulkumaryadav8198 3 роки тому +2

      Yah absolutely true even more is that or 15% of defence budget is spent on pension and not on acquiring equipments.

  • @SSumit225
    @SSumit225 3 роки тому +74

    THE GREAT INDIAN DEFENCE FORCES🇮🇳💪..JAI HIND🚩🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🚩🐅💪⚔😍🙏

    • @Skywalker622
      @Skywalker622 3 роки тому +2

      Hold your horses its not that great...it has still lots of rooms to improve but yeah its better than most.

    • @Krishnendu792
      @Krishnendu792 3 роки тому

      @@Skywalker622 I totally agree with the fact that one needs to be self critical about their capabilities but not calling your own defence forces great is a sign of self loath. Given the fact that Indian Army Navy and Air forces achivements and capabilities they posses. The world knows and looks India as a military counterweight of China for a reason.

    • @Skywalker622
      @Skywalker622 3 роки тому +1

      @@Krishnendu792 Yes i agree with your point. you have made a good point here. One should feel proud of one's military might and its achievements. There is nothing wrong with it. But sometimes i feel we get too carried away with our achievements which in turn results in blind faith. Being a little realistic and critical helps at such times.

    • @rambaliedihal7796
      @rambaliedihal7796 3 роки тому

      p

  • @djckmcyttshpo9544
    @djckmcyttshpo9544 3 роки тому +144

    *INDIA needs better military drones and anti_drone technology immediately*

    • @manishyadav-gr3dj
      @manishyadav-gr3dj 3 роки тому +12

      It has military drones🤦 but they need anti drone technology from isarel

    • @jj2000100
      @jj2000100 3 роки тому +5

      @@manishyadav-gr3dj why Israel? You doubting India's capabilities???🤔

    • @agentnoobz5588
      @agentnoobz5588 3 роки тому +1

      @@manishyadav-gr3dj Most of indian drones are surviallence there is not that much attack drones,Or he must be talking about indegenous drones and anti drones,The rustom project maybe

    • @bingus8135
      @bingus8135 3 роки тому +2

      @@jj2000100 No one's doubting Indian military's capability more than its weakened military industries and budget crunches.

    • @superdefinitely7254
      @superdefinitely7254 3 роки тому +1

      Missiles shot from fighter planes can be considered drones, just travel much faster and punch a heavier explosive.

  • @mariamthomas7458
    @mariamthomas7458 3 роки тому +96

    Might this boy carry indigenous aircrafts tedf ,tejas mk2,Amca

    • @Skywalker622
      @Skywalker622 3 роки тому +7

      Navy usually wants to play safe and favours two eingine fighters so probability of it carrying Tejas is low. Neways let just hope Tejas mk2 will be ready in the estimated time frame and AMCA will take even longer time to develop.

    • @gautamvarmak8207
      @gautamvarmak8207 3 роки тому

      @@Skywalker622 Well I believe India will require atleast 20 years to get 3rd aircraft carrier with indigenous aircraft considering it might take another 10 years or so to induct AMCA or tedbf. Tejas mk2 might be ready sooner, but it's too late to use in IAC-1.

    • @kishoreanandan5742
      @kishoreanandan5742 3 роки тому +4

      You have several flaws in your comment -
      {1}. INS Vikrant will carry neither the HAL AMCA nor the HAL Tejas MK2.
      {2}. Currently, it is slated to carry about 26 MiG-29K fighters, with a future addition of either the Super Hornet/Rafale-M - under the "Multi-Role Carrier-Borne Fighter" (MRCBF) Procurement Program.
      {3}. The HAL TEDBF is only slated for naval service in the 2030's, both on INS Vikrant, and the newer INS Vishal.

    • @varun_rao2004
      @varun_rao2004 3 роки тому +1

      Yup..🔥❣️

    • @Skywalker622
      @Skywalker622 3 роки тому

      Thanks for the info guys but what i meant was if indigenous fighters designs are to be considered the current fighter programs which are in more advance stages if proven very successful can also be adapted for carrier based operations to save money and resources which is required for developing an entirely new fighter design. Tejas mk2 is already in prototype building phase (Prototype expected to ready by 2023) and AMCA is further behind and tebdf project was only official announced in 2020. Well whatever the case maybe given India's track record of huge delays in defence projects let just hope all will be operational by around 2030 as expected.

  • @manishkulkarni4687
    @manishkulkarni4687 3 роки тому +156

    India has world's strongest aircraft carrier the Andaman and Nicobar Islands we should make that more stronger 💪

    • @njnihal3049
      @njnihal3049 3 роки тому +25

      Its not an aircraft carrier it has mobility which we need to project power
      yah we can develop the islands into large bases but that's not enough

    • @Bee_Bom
      @Bee_Bom 3 роки тому +17

      I wanted india to seize Maldives at the time of independence since its at very strategic location in Indian Ocean

    • @daniyalamed2960
      @daniyalamed2960 3 роки тому +13

      @@Bee_Bom Lol what? we are annexing small countries now??

    • @rommelcorbito808
      @rommelcorbito808 3 роки тому +1

      It's the India Vimana Warship that will be the India's superweapon that will be used against China, RIP China

    • @Bee_Bom
      @Bee_Bom 3 роки тому +14

      @@daniyalamed2960 we seized Lakshadweep and andaman n Nicobar then what's the problem with Maldives
      And btw I'm saying at the time of independence not in present times
      And one more thing Imperialism and capitalism is what makes a country strong by militarily or economically

  • @nps7742
    @nps7742 3 роки тому +85

    200 ships in Indian Ocean is more than enough for counter Chinese but we Need more submarine not Aircraft carriers and transform island in lakshadweep to naval base.

    • @Deepak-gr2xm
      @Deepak-gr2xm 3 роки тому +4

      @Kujo Jitendra 😂

    • @kamikazefighter7180
      @kamikazefighter7180 3 роки тому +6

      Can't agree with you more. We need more nuclear powered attack Subs.

    • @raysschoko
      @raysschoko 3 роки тому +5

      you need a global economic plan like China! but India is busy creating problems to slow china down! And that will fail!

    • @nps7742
      @nps7742 3 роки тому

      @@raysschoko don't be a fool India can do anything to slow down Chinese but America can do that India may get more business but slowing Chinese economy is not that something India can do.

    • @nothingtoseehere2079
      @nothingtoseehere2079 3 роки тому

      Ok admiral yamamoto But carriers are better than Subs cuz Carriers can send fighter jets every 5-10 mins but sub cant get out of danger cuz fighter jet will hit it before it can get under water . Carriers have alot of defenses to avoid Torpedoes.Subs in other hand will not able to take out any jets cuz when it'll marked as target everyone will start to put the sub under water before it'll get fully under water jets will blow it .

  • @advhaider80
    @advhaider80 3 роки тому +14

    Faana hone ki izzat le nahi jaati, yeh watan ke mohabbat hai janab puch ke ki nahi jaati 🇮🇳

  • @yuvraj08123
    @yuvraj08123 3 роки тому +39

    It's name vikrant in not incidentally it's the Navy's tradition.. they beleive that the ship never retire
    It's going for the same submarine arm ins khanderi vela kalvari

    • @nps7742
      @nps7742 3 роки тому +3

      She doesn't even know what she is talking most of Chinese ships are old and their aircraft carrier make sound which can hear from kilometres away it's just a test bed.

    • @nps7742
      @nps7742 3 роки тому

      @Allen Burger yah so what

    • @nps7742
      @nps7742 3 роки тому +1

      @Allen Burger yah we are scared of invincible Chinese no-one can touch Chinese they are so powerful.. 😂😂😂

    • @sendohakira3889
      @sendohakira3889 3 роки тому

      @@nps7742 To belittle your enemy in language does not make you strong. It just makes you look ignorant. To be honest I'm worried about China's military development. It's too fast.

    • @nps7742
      @nps7742 3 роки тому

      @@sendohakira3889 even if Chinese are strong like USA I would not be scared.simple thing is if Chinese start a war they have much more to lose they can forget about their ambition to become like USA . India in defense mode they can breach Himalaya and they can send their aircraft carrier to Indian Ocean even if they send both their AC they will not get air superiority in India ocean. India can't go offensive but Chinese will not win the war their trade roots will be blocked for months and their economy affect the most only winner will be USA again. Because that how they stay a superpower they will never allow a war happen in their land . Nobady seeing Chinese down but India has the capability to counter Chinese . If they realise that it's good for them

  • @dinkybuck1697
    @dinkybuck1697 3 роки тому +18

    When Vikrant began construction, China had no carriers now it has 3.

    • @Tickson
      @Tickson 3 роки тому

      @ASHWIN S NAIR yeah but I think No. 3 will be ready for deployment before 2030 and by then they will already start building super carriers the size of American Nimitz and Ford carriers

    • @dinkybuck1697
      @dinkybuck1697 3 роки тому +3

      @ASHWIN S NAIR Its construction has seen more progress in 2 months than Vikrant in 2 years.

    • @dinkybuck1697
      @dinkybuck1697 3 роки тому +2

      @ASHWIN S NAIR it’s not an exaggeration but rather an understatement, Vikrant has been in construction for almost 2 decades agon. Look at the grow of Chinese navy in 2 decades

    • @roy4788
      @roy4788 3 роки тому +2

      It shows that India is incompetent...

    • @jenny2329
      @jenny2329 3 роки тому

      003, deployed in 2023, China will have six aircraft carriers in 2030, two of which are nuclear power

  • @adminacer4778
    @adminacer4778 Місяць тому

    A great friend. Love and respect for India ❤ from the philippines

  • @abhisheksumanAS
    @abhisheksumanAS 3 роки тому +18

    India needs to heavily liberalize, privatize & incentivize its defense industry if it really wants to hold balance in this era of technological and advanced computational system warfare.

    • @raythompson6723
      @raythompson6723 3 роки тому

      India is the largest democracy in the world also she has vicious neighbours to the north this is why she needs a next carrier and more 💝 India

    • @biggwong6912
      @biggwong6912 3 роки тому

      Yes, bcz of China threat, India needs to build at least 3 more 65k ton carriers ASAP, otherwise it will be too late.

    • @aparnashandilya4629
      @aparnashandilya4629 3 роки тому

      BRO DEFENCE NEVER GET PRIVATIZE

    • @theunbeatable1755
      @theunbeatable1755 3 роки тому

      Well modi is trying to do that

  • @compassion7243
    @compassion7243 3 роки тому +2

    It's not the quantity...the quality...its more important...god bless India...

    • @shriramshriram8333
      @shriramshriram8333 3 роки тому

      But some times quantity wins quality bro

    • @sidharthcs2110
      @sidharthcs2110 3 роки тому

      That's the excuse we have , to hide our low output

    • @insomnia5462
      @insomnia5462 3 роки тому +1

      U do not have either,quality was also very low

  • @Slicer400
    @Slicer400 3 роки тому +12

    Proud to see it being built everyday at kkchi

  • @SSumit225
    @SSumit225 3 роки тому +4

    SUPER POWERFUL INCREDIBLE GREAT INDIA..JAI HIND🚩🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🚩🐅💪⚔😍🙏

    • @legendahmad8548
      @legendahmad8548 3 роки тому +2

      Gay hind

    • @erenyeager5003
      @erenyeager5003 3 роки тому

      India can't even beat B'Desh....Look at Roumari border war....

    • @SSumit225
      @SSumit225 3 роки тому

      @@erenyeager5003 beta hum sapne nahi dekhte hai hum karke dikhate hai..aur sun tum logo ki kyu phati padi hai BHARAT se..BETA..YE NAYA BHARAT HAI ..GHAR ME GHUS K MARTA HAI AUR 72 HOORO K PAAS BHEJTA HAI..JAI HIND🚩🇮🇳💪🙏

  • @SSumit225
    @SSumit225 3 роки тому +18

    VENDEMATARAM..BHARATMATA KI JAI..JAI HIND..JAI HO🚩🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🚩🐅💪⚔😍🙏

  • @jahnavinaik6508
    @jahnavinaik6508 3 роки тому +2

    My grandfather service INDIAN NAVY I proud of me....❤️❤️💪❤️❤️

  • @banijawi2253
    @banijawi2253 3 роки тому +32

    There's no way for India to challenge China in aircraft carrier development as the latter almost completed constructing the 3rd ship

    • @Skywalker622
      @Skywalker622 3 роки тому +8

      Yes and US has 11 much bigger ones does that matter to China ?

    • @banijawi2253
      @banijawi2253 3 роки тому +5

      But will the US dare to attack China since both have nuclear weapons....if it does half the world will be gone

    • @Skywalker622
      @Skywalker622 3 роки тому +3

      @@banijawi2253 I was replying to your previous comment. And you haven't replied to my question...Does it matter to China that US has 11 aircraft carriers?. BTW- India is also a nuclear armed country.

    • @lisachao550
      @lisachao550 3 роки тому +4

      @@Skywalker622 Russia is with CHINA

    • @banijawi2253
      @banijawi2253 3 роки тому +10

      @@Skywalker622 India is easy meat for China 🤣🤣🤣🙏🙏🙏

  • @JackBlackSM
    @JackBlackSM 3 роки тому +29

    And CDS Rawat should be removed as the biggest block in the development of the IAF and Indian Navy! He is a motormouth and has been making many loose comments. INS Vishal needs to be finalized soon and the construction launched asap.

    • @jey2275
      @jey2275 3 роки тому +6

      Yes, his mouth is uncontrollable , many issues with wings of our military occured due to his faults .

    • @agentnoobz5588
      @agentnoobz5588 3 роки тому +9

      He only cares about his beloved army and only wants Westren and Russian weapons and always delays trials of indegenous weapons and makes it do test 10,000 times well he doesn't even need testing for foreign weapons direct buying

    • @sheetalverma8940
      @sheetalverma8940 3 роки тому +8

      @@agentnoobz5588 nothing gets inducted without testing. Why are you misleading people? Where is the evidence for your statement? Its a horrible statement.

    • @sheetalverma8940
      @sheetalverma8940 3 роки тому +2

      @@jey2275 yeah the issues did occur. Issues occurred for army and navy too. Nothing has been finalized so take a chillpill. Relax! He wont be leaving till 2025.

    • @stairwaytoheaven1719
      @stairwaytoheaven1719 3 роки тому +3

      @@agentnoobz5588 trials are done by other generals not CDS

  • @benedictrodrick8628
    @benedictrodrick8628 3 роки тому +44

    Start planning for building another aircraft carrier.
    Because it will take another 10 years to build it.

    • @nothingtoseehere2079
      @nothingtoseehere2079 3 роки тому

      Japanese-Subs
      America-Destroyers
      India-Aircraft Carrier

    • @Tickson
      @Tickson 3 роки тому +1

      @@nothingtoseehere2079 No, America ships, aircraft carriers and subs they have the best of the best, the largest aircraft carriers who hold the most planes, their other ships are really strong as well and they only field nuclear powered subs and a large amount of them

    • @roy4788
      @roy4788 3 роки тому

      You dont need 10 or 20 years to build an aircraft carrier if you have the technology, money and skilled engineers.
      Look at China, launching new aircraft carrier almost every 5 years.

    • @asakurayoh3909
      @asakurayoh3909 3 роки тому +3

      @@roy4788 No wonder there were cracks on the deck of the new Chinese carrier and is now going under maintenance.

    • @sealtrader
      @sealtrader 3 роки тому +1

      @@asakurayoh3909 You have a crack on your head as well. Prolly IQ of 75. 🤣

  • @abymathew295
    @abymathew295 3 роки тому +8

    INS Vikrant, Heck..we need another Carrier with at least 65000 tonnes.

    • @kushalagarwal703
      @kushalagarwal703 3 роки тому

      That's INS Vishaal

    • @abymathew295
      @abymathew295 3 роки тому +1

      @@kushalagarwal703 , yeahh a name is only what we have...no official planning yet

    • @abymathew295
      @abymathew295 3 роки тому +1

      @Biplab Roy , not the budget, Navy wants 6 SSNs rather a 650000 tonne Carrier..thats why they want to spend 50000 crores on it.

  • @krapto3467
    @krapto3467 3 роки тому +6

    A probably easily understandable error, but yes the Chinese carrier in construction is 320 metres long,not high.

    • @oksowhat
      @oksowhat 3 роки тому +2

      imagine a 320m high carrier, lol

  • @Lc-gm1og
    @Lc-gm1og 3 роки тому +8

    I think the government of India should Developed its country economy first and foremost before start spending all those money on ARM.

    • @abhisheksangwan7142
      @abhisheksangwan7142 3 роки тому +1

      indian goverment is more smarter then you so shut your mouth .

    • @umashankars2493
      @umashankars2493 3 роки тому

      Military is the first priority, if a country is not protected, what should we do with economy??

    • @yoman7873
      @yoman7873 3 роки тому

      Bro I understand what you mean but India has horrible neighbors and if we will not develop our military than they will continue to bully us as they please.

    • @umashankars2493
      @umashankars2493 3 роки тому +1

      Bro see in 17th century, india was the biggest economy, richest country in terms of gdp, but in military, we were nothing, and result? We were colonized for more than 2 centuries, so let's learn from our history and not make the same mistake..

  • @monkeybaath2325
    @monkeybaath2325 3 роки тому +6

    What India really needs is an educated leader having common sense !!!

  • @CyrusInIndia
    @CyrusInIndia 3 роки тому +12

    China had zero Aircraft Carriers till just 2011.
    India operating aircraft carrier since 1961. 50 years apart and China has marched ahead in this category too.
    Today after 10 years it has 3 carriers. 2 operational, one almost ready and 1 amphibious assault helicopter carrier as well. That's their manufacturing capability.
    INS Vikrant is at best a medium-medium weight category aircraft carrier. It's not even 50k tons displacement.
    Even UK where manufacturing has stagnated built 2 carriers almost simultaneously in the 65k tons category.
    Of course USA has 20 carriers out of which 11 are super carriers in the 100,000 to 107000 tons category. 20 carriers mind boggling.
    And just so that it doesn't scare other nations too much it doesn't consider the 9 out of the 20 as carriers which are the size of between Vikrant and Vikramaditya. It calls them amphibious assault ships. But they're as large as Vikramaditya.
    So yes 20 carriers in all for USA.
    China has openly stated it wants 10 carriers in its Navy and atleast 6 by 2030 or so. Highly possible.
    They'll barely take 2.5 to 3 years to float the carrier.
    We take 15 years to just think of an acquisition.
    Just one example the MMRCA for Airforce is pending since 2004. It's a bloody joke. There are many such examples actually.
    Minesweepers
    Helicopter carriers
    AWACS
    Refuellers and many more.
    And Indian Navy doesn't even have sufficient fighter jets to operate from both the aircraft carriers.
    And the INS Vishal on paper' since 2010.

    • @gautamvarmak8207
      @gautamvarmak8207 3 роки тому +1

      Facts. The solution is improving GDP and allocating funds for innovation and technology. It will certainly take a long time before India can match china's manufacturing capability.

    • @max19487
      @max19487 3 роки тому +1

      fake news

  • @humanitycomefirst-proudind8903
    @humanitycomefirst-proudind8903 3 роки тому +12

    INS Vikrant ❤❤🇮🇳🇮🇳🙏🙏

  • @vikram_shahi
    @vikram_shahi 3 роки тому +6

    Jai Hind! Jai Bharat!
    🙏🏼⚔️❤️🇮🇳❤️⚔️🙏🏼

  • @raythompson6723
    @raythompson6723 3 роки тому +9

    India needs a next carrier ASAP all Free thinking countries of the world wants India to succeed 💝India .

    • @gibsonsg6201
      @gibsonsg6201 3 роки тому

      Since when The West wants India to succeed? Britain partitioned India and turned it into two separate countries - India and Pakistan. Turning brothers against brothers. Now, trying to be the enabler of the Indian armed forces in the event a hot war was to happen, India will be the first line of fodders as they have always been subservient to their former colonizer. The depth of the abyss, the heart of darkness that is the British Empire. They even shamelessly cozy up to the Empire of Japan wanting to work closely together in the containment of a prosperous, peaceful but rising China. All those murdered British Expeditionary Force soldiers among tens of thousands of other allied soldiers must be turning over in their final resting place and howling in disbelief how low the British empire has sunk. Just remember Pearl Harbour, Singapore, Hong Kong, Burma, Manila, Guam, etc. Lest we forget!

    • @biggwong6912
      @biggwong6912 3 роки тому +1

      I would say at least 3 needed ASAP.

    • @raythompson6723
      @raythompson6723 3 роки тому

      btw although I am from the West I am not from Britain also most of what you said is true British colonialism was particularly brutal to India
      It was also brutal to Africa and the caribbean where I am from
      But India has been independent
      Of the British many decades now
      and given that it is now the world's largest democracy also
      Among the world's top 5 military
      Also living beside a vicious neighbour to the north India should assert itself more in the
      World , the world is a safer place
      When a democratic country like
      India becomes a super power
      So the wish of all well thinking
      Citizens of the world is that India
      Should be stronger militarily .

    • @biggwong6912
      @biggwong6912 3 роки тому

      @@raythompson6723 , of course you are not from Britain, you are from India. India is a chaos country, corrupted, divided, extremely superstitious, it will not be a superpower country in foreseeable future. Stop day dreaming.

    • @raythompson6723
      @raythompson6723 3 роки тому

      @@biggwong6912 And your from China ,, right ? 😑

  • @jjjjc5999
    @jjjjc5999 3 роки тому +8

    This is very funny. When I first heard about this ship, there was no aircraft carrier in China. Now the third aircraft carrier in China is almost finished, and this ship has not yet served. Perhaps this is the level of Indian military industry.

    • @GenocideWesterners
      @GenocideWesterners 3 роки тому +1

      Yeah, our Indian military was sleeping before china’s aggression at LAC. At last they have realised that China is not a friend or partner but an enemy who will never honour any paper they sign.

    • @jjjjc5999
      @jjjjc5999 3 роки тому +6

      @@GenocideWesterners In my opinion, it is foolish for India to compete with China in arms, and India has no chance of winning. To be honest, your government is only taking the initiative to provoke conflicts with China to divert domestic problems, such as COVID-19 outbreak, economy and domestic regional conflicts.

    • @jjjjc5999
      @jjjjc5999 3 роки тому +4

      @@GenocideWesterners Also, we can see from the comments in this video that Indian nationalism is too serious. I really don't understand why you are so hostile to China. Is it because of a war nearly 50 years ago?

    • @Nickyb0001
      @Nickyb0001 3 роки тому

      @@jjjjc5999 Because every country is tired of China's cheap and worthless things. Even the people of china are tired of watching buildings and bridges collapsing almost everyday. This is our 2nd carrier and 3rd one is being planned. China is famous for making clones of everything be it arms or anything else.

    • @jjjjc5999
      @jjjjc5999 3 роки тому +3

      @@Nickyb0001 Ignorant comments, the quality of products depends on the price you pay. Perhaps the mobile phone you are using now is made in China, and belittling your opponent will not make you strong.

  • @csren8328
    @csren8328 3 роки тому +5

    40,000 tons aircraft carriers, same tonnage with Chinese 075 amphibious assault ship...

  • @rohananand7263
    @rohananand7263 3 роки тому +2

    Type-003 will not be nuclear powered carrier. There will be two Type-003 carriers which are closer to now decommissioned Kitty-Hawk class carriers and further China will construct larger Type-004 carriers which will be nuclear powered and will truly be the size of American Ford and Nimitz-class carriers.

  • @abhijeetvaishnab7738
    @abhijeetvaishnab7738 3 роки тому +17

    And more aircraft carrier we need

    • @worthit5064
      @worthit5064 3 роки тому +10

      in my opinion submarines are more dangerous.

    • @jj2000100
      @jj2000100 3 роки тому

      How many do you think India needs??😅

    • @lucifermorningstar4187
      @lucifermorningstar4187 3 роки тому +3

      @@jj2000100 3 atleast, we still have the unsinkable carrier of INS Hansa in Andaman and Nicobar , at any given time 2 should be operational , I personally think we should have helicarriers with stobar like the Japanese Izumo class

    • @jj2000100
      @jj2000100 3 роки тому

      @@lucifermorningstar4187 was hoping that the person who commented "many more carriers needed" answer..
      But yeah! What you mentioned makes sense .
      Agree with the first part you mentioned but I disagree with second part.
      INS Vikrant not just holds fixed wing but it holds a mix of fixed wing and rotary aircrafts.
      Helicarriers like the one you mentioned lack STOBAR and can only be used for vertical lift and landing. Vikranth uses STOBAR.
      I'm of the opinion we need more submarines along with few destroyers and other supporting vessels.. we already have them but we need more numbers...

    • @eashanshetty8879
      @eashanshetty8879 3 роки тому +1

      @@worthit5064 Ya, I think we should manufacture 15 more submarines

  • @lawomega1
    @lawomega1 3 роки тому +2

    Good to see that the Indian nation has started the construction of their second aircraft carrier ,this will go a long way to keep the south china sea ,available for all nations to trade around the world, and also superb to watch India stand up to communist China ,that think they can dictate what goes in the region . Well done ,we are proud of you

  • @crookedlycrooked9256
    @crookedlycrooked9256 3 роки тому +3

    2:35 those are pics of HMS Queen Elizabteth

  • @sandeeps5793
    @sandeeps5793 3 роки тому +2

    Well done India❣️

  • @SSumit225
    @SSumit225 3 роки тому +5

    AKHANDBHARAT JINDABAAD.HINDUSTAN JINDABAAD..JAI HO🚩🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🚩🐅💪⚔😍🙏

    • @Faizal723
      @Faizal723 3 роки тому

      Communist bharat
      Zindabad

    • @alteredcarbon5824
      @alteredcarbon5824 3 роки тому +2

      @@Faizal723
      Get lost.
      We are democratic.

    • @GenocideWesterners
      @GenocideWesterners 3 роки тому

      @@Faizal723 How are you planning on establishing communism in India ? I am not a communist but you can call me a democratic socialist or anti capitalist. I hate capitalism but I don’t believe soviet style communism is the answer.

  • @The__Leo69
    @The__Leo69 3 роки тому +3

    2:35 That's imagery from HMS Queen Elizabeth I guess. Double control towers and Lockheed jets.

  • @pilipinopilipinoy5901
    @pilipinopilipinoy5901 3 роки тому +3

    To address against enemy naval assets, must develop multiple type of long range precision heavy ordinance ship killer missiles.

  • @greywolf7798
    @greywolf7798 3 роки тому +3

    Before to take outside enemies, we must finish inside enemies! Who always barks against india within the india

  • @indiasuperclean6969
    @indiasuperclean6969 3 роки тому +7

    DONT WORRY WE INDIAN HAVE SUPER GENIUS SOLDIER WITH FLYING JETS LIKE IRON MAN WW READY SACRIFICE LIFE FOR MODI 💪😎🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳

    • @Shivam-kz2dg
      @Shivam-kz2dg 3 роки тому +2

      Ola hu uber

    • @reaper9443
      @reaper9443 3 роки тому +3

      Sacrifice my whole life for pakistan grape 🍇

    • @ghtwghtw7197
      @ghtwghtw7197 3 роки тому

      Hahahaha

    • @jey2275
      @jey2275 3 роки тому

      Why are you so dump , show some sense and culture .

  • @marshalzhukov9683
    @marshalzhukov9683 3 роки тому +2

    Achieving such a thing shows the advancement of the indian military but it would only take 1 DF-21 to sink it
    Btw Lot’s of love from 🇵🇰

  • @nirajsingh484
    @nirajsingh484 3 роки тому +3

    India needs well equipped two dozen destroyers 3 dozen versatile frigates 30 plus submarines 4 aircraft carriers 3 amphibious assault helicopter carriers 54 modern fast Corvettes and 12 minesweepers and 6 tankers and 4 support ships to dominate sea and challenge china. We are way behind and our ships are also under equipped compare to usa china and even japan or south korea.

    • @nirajsingh484
      @nirajsingh484 3 роки тому

      @Prakash kumar ped pr uge ya na uge jo baat hai so hai. Waise to sab chal hi rha hai or chalega hi.

  • @tossalot
    @tossalot 3 роки тому +1

    Good luck and welcome to the club from the U.K.

  • @manishyadav-gr3dj
    @manishyadav-gr3dj 3 роки тому +5

    Good work ✨🇮🇳🙏 we need more made in india technology , I hope many more private companies will jump in defence sector in india ✨

    • @jacky4365
      @jacky4365 3 роки тому +1

      The hull is made in india, but all the key equipments, like engine, radar, navigation etc are imported from other countries.

  • @clipcutter1574
    @clipcutter1574 3 роки тому +2

    Here it is mentioned the Vikrant would be commissioned only in 2024.
    But I have read several articles and news where it was mentioned it would be commissioned in the beginning of 2023.

  • @abhinashsharma1285
    @abhinashsharma1285 3 роки тому +3

    Hmmmmmm,,, doesn't matter.. YOU CAN'T FIGHT THE WORLD'S LARGEST NAVY WITH THAT THING. ONE TORPEDO FROM A NUCLEAR SUB, IT GOES BOOM..

  • @gandhikumar2956
    @gandhikumar2956 3 роки тому

    India, the next superpower.

  • @sumukhasureban8249
    @sumukhasureban8249 3 роки тому +4

    I think this is the reason why fuel rate
    Caused 100rs

  • @rebelfighter7980
    @rebelfighter7980 3 роки тому +1

    It's compatibility and fighting spirit should be strengthened so that it can fight with superb brutal spirit against enemies

  • @anoopkannan4159
    @anoopkannan4159 3 роки тому +3

    Proud. To be from Kerala

  • @oksowhat
    @oksowhat 3 роки тому +4

    so renovating vikramaditya costed 2.35 billion dollors but making vikrant costed about 2.7 billion dollors, adjust inflation both are similar price, the diffrence in making at home vs making abroad, lol

    • @lucifermorningstar4187
      @lucifermorningstar4187 3 роки тому

      We didn't had a proven tech source , with vikrant now , it would be faster , cheaper and easier to build the 3rd carrier now at home

  • @kishorechakku3309
    @kishorechakku3309 3 роки тому +6

    we are so much behind in development such that we are using other aircraft carriers video

    • @cryptohornbill9658
      @cryptohornbill9658 3 роки тому +1

      😂😂.

    • @biggwong6912
      @biggwong6912 3 роки тому

      India medias want to show the home make carrier in their video, but it was not ready yet. The only choice is using other countries carrier in the video. What they gonna do?

  • @apachetamizha
    @apachetamizha 3 роки тому

    India Govt must give vast chances to the IITians to develop many more strategic assets to safeguard the country.....Jai Hind

  • @tamaghnanag491
    @tamaghnanag491 3 роки тому +3

    Not "INCIDENTALLY" Indian Navy has a tradition of rechristening ships with old warship names. It has been going on for decades.

  • @ansajtn8808
    @ansajtn8808 3 роки тому

    From Kerala, Kochi🇮🇳
    Name:INS VIKRANT 🔥🔥🔥💪🏼

  • @trigger4o49
    @trigger4o49 3 роки тому +3

    most of the images are of the HMS queen elizabeth

  • @AndySpicer
    @AndySpicer 3 роки тому

    That was very good. I don’t see a lot of news regarding Indian military topics here in the US. It’s good to have a source of information.

  • @dinpuiivanchhawng1741
    @dinpuiivanchhawng1741 3 роки тому +15

    Good news bois,Cant wait for Chinese bots

    • @mainhoopmchaiwalamodi2244
      @mainhoopmchaiwalamodi2244 3 роки тому +3

      Carrier look like a piece of junk

    • @aaryankumar8770
      @aaryankumar8770 3 роки тому +1

      @@mainhoopmchaiwalamodi2244 yeah Pakistan navy doesn't even have a big navy
      You guys can't even compete with gulf Nation navies

    • @biggwong6912
      @biggwong6912 3 роки тому +1

      A midget carrier only equal to Chinese 075 LPD size, nothing to brag about.

  • @internationalbeggar133
    @internationalbeggar133 3 роки тому +1

    Vikrant is back

  • @RoodeMenon
    @RoodeMenon 3 роки тому +5

    Holy crap! She almost gave me a heart attack at the beginning!

  • @sureshav5930
    @sureshav5930 3 роки тому

    Sincere thanks with folded hands for taking steps to protect our sovereignty as prestigious in the world...

  • @ponsyu1951
    @ponsyu1951 3 роки тому +10

    Wrong priority for India to venture and focus on military expansion like aircraft carrier, rather focus on their gigantic domestic problems like health, covid 19, poverty, infrastructure, etc.

    • @ang4065
      @ang4065 3 роки тому +2

      Why are you afraid ?

    • @BIGMlccc
      @BIGMlccc 3 роки тому +1

      @@ang4065 He just made a suggestion sincerely and kindly. China is indeed afraid of India, because China does not regard India as a competitor, but India has always wanted to be beaten, making people dumbfounded.

    • @gibsonsg6201
      @gibsonsg6201 3 роки тому

      @Ishaan Singh don’t worry. China will never invade India. Rationale being why bother to take on all the refugees and dealing with the Covid delta variants. Leave India and her politicians alone and India will look after her sick and the under privileged. In time, India will have deliverance and all her people will get holy enlightenment. Karma shall rule.

    • @gibsonsg6201
      @gibsonsg6201 3 роки тому

      @Ishaan Singh using your own words, if national security matters in India, why is it then when she brings in her national security law on Hong Kong, the West with their minions are screaming their heads off?

    • @le_ecrivaine
      @le_ecrivaine 3 роки тому

      @Pons Yu:
      If we do not spend on defence, India as a nation will cease to exist

  • @samueltan7343
    @samueltan7343 3 роки тому

    I hope India can build the aircraft carrier and show the world their capabilities. The question now is, how long and when can we Really see the real Indian aircraft carrier??

  • @thecuberian2887
    @thecuberian2887 3 роки тому +14

    If Pappu was in power, he would say ( dekho bhaiya, koi sarurat nahi aircraft carrier ki, hum China se baat chit karke mamla suljaenge).

    • @worthit5064
      @worthit5064 3 роки тому

      Tum rajniti kr lo army maine bhi 😒

    • @jey2275
      @jey2275 3 роки тому +3

      Don't blame him unnecessarily he has no connection to it , what was Modi doing its 7 years under him the carrier is lying in Kochi ?? Why not blame Modi ??
      So don't be stupid .so blame games dosent work , when ever something happens you guys start comparing him with Rahul , but he isn't even in power or was in power he has not even a slight bit of connection to these issues then why are you dragging him in each and everything ?? It's serious construction started in the initial year of the past decade , and it roughly was 3-4 years under Congress the rest 7 years under Modi , Modi could've finished it ?? The minimum years it will take is 8 , so Congress can't do it in 4 , who couldve done it is Modi , your blaming dosent work , Modi is responsible for the delays , look at it right now it can be commissioned this year itself if worked correctly it's his problem first and foremost .

    • @dArK-nq9ho
      @dArK-nq9ho 3 роки тому

      @@jey2275 yeah

    • @worthit5064
      @worthit5064 3 роки тому

      @@jey2275 good point.

    • @xxwrattxx4450
      @xxwrattxx4450 3 роки тому

      @@jey2275 he is alloting funds what can he do other than that ins Vikrantay be inducTed in next year

  • @finenterprisespvtltd6707
    @finenterprisespvtltd6707 3 роки тому +2

    Only in India it takes 22+ years to build a ship.

    • @hagankeys3610
      @hagankeys3610 3 роки тому +2

      Good things take times. For museum though

  • @jerryohyeekeat8573
    @jerryohyeekeat8573 3 роки тому +3

    😂😂😂 it's been more than 10 years I heard of this but yet to get into the ocean......

    • @pratiklokhande7735
      @pratiklokhande7735 3 роки тому

      But It will happen now because of Modi

    • @jerryohyeekeat8573
      @jerryohyeekeat8573 3 роки тому

      @@pratiklokhande7735 😂😂😂 I don't see any positive outcome progress instead I saw a dummies on your parade.....😂😂😂

    • @degreecelsius6142
      @degreecelsius6142 3 роки тому

      @@jerryohyeekeat8573 lol, there should be burnol in your house.

    • @theunbeatable1755
      @theunbeatable1755 3 роки тому

      @@degreecelsius6142 he probably needs burnol factory

  • @bg24955
    @bg24955 3 роки тому +1

    Was hoping to see more stock photos/ video about Indian aircraft carrier. Not French or UK carrier.

  • @chandravikramsingh633
    @chandravikramsingh633 3 роки тому +8

    Wow you people literally showing french Navy's Charles de Gaulle and UK's navy queen elizabeth aircraft career in between. What is wrong with you people?

    • @stephenlee7960
      @stephenlee7960 3 роки тому

      Whatever happened to HMS Hermes ex Royal Navy

  • @michaelmitchell6629
    @michaelmitchell6629 3 роки тому +1

    I hope if still alive in 2 or 3 yrs want to visit India as tourist an take nice. Passenger train. To tour India from coast to coast
    Never been there
    My first navy duty station was on Combat Stores Ship
    Afs4 uss white plains we were called the Orient Express cause we visited many nations in Asia to get
    Supplies an stores to our navy carrier strike groups in Gulf of Oman and Indian ocean
    We made 7 deployments to Indian ocean
    But due to politics an problems in India my ship was gonna dock in port in Bombay India or town on Indian Ocean but your govt deny my ship port visit I think?

  • @sabtainsadiq6405
    @sabtainsadiq6405 3 роки тому +4

    Because since 1945
    no aircraft carrier has been sunk in the high seas. Will be an ideal target for Pakistani Harpoon or Exocet missiles.

  • @superdefinitely7254
    @superdefinitely7254 3 роки тому +1

    Nice to see indian navy practicing with the US and other alliance navies.

  • @arjunraj823
    @arjunraj823 3 роки тому +4

    But we are behind. China is moving ahead in military tech at really fast pace.Also their space program is good.

    • @tapankar5303
      @tapankar5303 3 роки тому

      they are not a democracy.....it is expected

    • @max19487
      @max19487 3 роки тому +2

      @@tapankar5303 Yes, democracy is faith. I cannot eat without democracy.

    • @soapcang696
      @soapcang696 3 роки тому

      @@max19487 “中国在国防跟太空领域大踏步又怎么样呢,他们又不是民主国家”,印度政府是个什么执政效率这群喝牛尿的没个B数吗?

  • @RevsAndWheels
    @RevsAndWheels 3 роки тому +2

    Indian Armed Forces should also focus on Afghanistan issue...

    • @Taliban.The.Hyperpower
      @Taliban.The.Hyperpower 3 роки тому +1

      The attrition India will suffer will made the country even bankrupt.. 3 superpower down, let alone india, a regional player.. with its inefficient Bollywood RAW intelligence that shows lacks of intelligence.. lol

  • @zulkanainbaharuddin2185
    @zulkanainbaharuddin2185 3 роки тому +3

    2003 to 2024. More then 20 years.
    Good luck.

  • @virendrakumarsingh6288
    @virendrakumarsingh6288 3 роки тому +2

    Sea harriers were discontinued along with decommissioning of ins viraat ..and china aims to operate 5 flattops by 2030 they are having 2 in construction and 1 in pipeline ..

  • @sunnymitra6372
    @sunnymitra6372 3 роки тому +4

    India should stop wastage of Taxpayers money and focus more on Land Based Aircraft Carriers.........Aircraft Carriers have resulted in Massive Corruption. India should Focus more on Submarines which is more Affordable

    • @jey2275
      @jey2275 3 роки тому +1

      Both have its own purposes , so avoiding something and focusing on something else is not the way , by the way is there any Indian program that is free of corruption ??? India is a currupt state , it is ranked as the most corrupt country in Asia .

  • @thenameis_dk
    @thenameis_dk 3 роки тому +2

    We need at least a Steam Catapult launch technology for our Aircraft Carrieres instead of the current Skie Jump version. Catapult launch will increase the weapon payload of jets. The US has introduced new Electro Magnetic Catapult technology in their new Aircraft Carrier USS GERALD R FORD.

    • @rohitb5834
      @rohitb5834 3 роки тому +1

      our next Carrier INS Vishal is planned on those lines. Its called a CATOBAR design.

  • @vitaminprotein7119
    @vitaminprotein7119 3 роки тому +3

    200- 250 is enough for navy. We have geographical advantage.
    Quality > Quantity = ✅.

    • @agentnoobz5588
      @agentnoobz5588 3 роки тому +1

      Wrong in army and airforces quality is more needed that quantity,But in navy its opposite numbers matter in navy the more the powerful

    • @GenocideWesterners
      @GenocideWesterners 3 роки тому

      At least 4 carriers, 20 to 25 destroyers, 30 to 40 frigates, 50+ corvettes and minimum 40 submarines are required for our Indian navy to effectively deter China.

    • @vitaminprotein7119
      @vitaminprotein7119 3 роки тому

      @@GenocideWesterners 4 carriers??.
      Nope. That's waste of money dude.
      More Subs enough.
      We have Andaman to counter China in strait of malacca. That island is enough, it won't get retired like carrier.
      It won't cost much too.

    • @vitaminprotein7119
      @vitaminprotein7119 3 роки тому

      @@agentnoobz5588 we need to face pakistan. For China it's straight of malacca. We need powerful subs, carriers, fighters, warships to defend them from entering inside.
      Warships 250 enough. We need more drones, unmanned little subs ( sea drones in water ).
      China will just run away and their supply chains and trade will die.

  • @shivajivythi7307
    @shivajivythi7307 3 роки тому

    🙏🙏🙏🙏❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️👍👍👍👍👍 hats off to the Indian armed forces 🥰

  • @Meghnaaad
    @Meghnaaad 3 роки тому +3

    It's 2.5 times smaller than the American ones 🤦

    • @Meghnaaad
      @Meghnaaad 3 роки тому +1

      @Biplab Roy but we have cheap engineers and workers. We could make it in 5-6 billion dollars.
      They also make it in 5 years and we take more than 2 decades to make one damn ship. That's also a reason of rise in prices.

    • @Meghnaaad
      @Meghnaaad 3 роки тому

      @Biplab Roy our PM wasted more than a Billion dollar in a statue. We need 3 carriers atleast.

    • @Meghnaaad
      @Meghnaaad 3 роки тому

      @Biplab Roy rehne de bhai tu. Tu hi jana use dekhne.
      Or 200 saal me uski original keemat wasul ho paegi.
      Tourist spot my foot.

  • @eddy8828
    @eddy8828 3 роки тому

    Excellent reporting👍

  • @manojprasad5805
    @manojprasad5805 3 роки тому +3

    WARS SHOULD ACTUALLY END. THIS IS SO SCARY AND PEOPLE LOSE SO MANY LIVES 😰

  • @rameshrai7844
    @rameshrai7844 3 роки тому +2

    Priority India need to feed poor people.

    • @biggwong6912
      @biggwong6912 3 роки тому

      Yes, millions of dying due to starvation.

  • @kankong2969
    @kankong2969 3 роки тому +6

    By the time u the elephant bring in the 2nd acc, the dragon would have 4-5 acc fai0

    • @Shashank_Sharma99
      @Shashank_Sharma99 3 роки тому +1

      u mean the bat* ?

    • @HarshKumar-qn1jc
      @HarshKumar-qn1jc 3 роки тому

      Becoz we can blame govt. Not like Chinese

    • @rkr1635
      @rkr1635 3 роки тому

      Usa already have 11Acc. fuck pla navy.

    • @sangilimurugan6084
      @sangilimurugan6084 3 роки тому

      Indians built war ships more than 1000 years ago by Chola, Now India back to unbeatable build War ships, hats of Indian Engineers. If Dragon comes we will have Yazhi acc version

  • @the100radsstalker93
    @the100radsstalker93 3 роки тому +1

    INS Vikrant 2.0 rebooted.

  • @skmgamer8214
    @skmgamer8214 3 роки тому +4

    7:25
    320m high 🤣🤣🤣🤣
    Proofs they just read or they just speak what ever written 🤣
    Think before speak
    Aunty ji 320meters in length not height 😂

  • @rubanmastu3810
    @rubanmastu3810 3 роки тому

    thanks for the info Angel.

  • @VIPUL46
    @VIPUL46 3 роки тому +4

    Sea Harriers have been retired..they keep showing us Nimitz class carriers while detailing ins Vikrant...such stupid analysis

  • @knowledgeseeker8546
    @knowledgeseeker8546 3 роки тому +2

    You are showing all the other aircraft carrier videos rather than Vikrant. Get a nice footage of the ship first, then think of making a video.

  • @pareshindia
    @pareshindia 3 роки тому +4

    Insted we should buy one. Took more than 20 yeas for one ship.

    • @gautamvarmak8207
      @gautamvarmak8207 3 роки тому +2

      Nope, should make it on our own. Even china took 20+ years to refurbish soviet era carrier. Building/innovating on ur own will give the advantage in the long run.

    • @soapcang696
      @soapcang696 3 роки тому

      国防军工搞买办是吧?印度政府人均稻上飞实锤了

    • @joselee9605
      @joselee9605 3 роки тому

      @@gautamvarmak8207 That’s pretty poor logic, yeah it’s theoretically better in the long run but it took even China 20 years to refurbish a carrier, an Indian carrier program from scratch would take a century

    • @gautamvarmak8207
      @gautamvarmak8207 3 роки тому

      @@joselee9605 Why will it take a century? How come it took 15 years to construct IAC-1 then?

    • @joselee9605
      @joselee9605 3 роки тому

      @@gautamvarmak8207 Yeah, exactly my point, the Vikrant isn’t from scratch. The Indians are far better off using already established designs instead of starting from scratch

  • @michaeljoydeepmahapatra4662
    @michaeljoydeepmahapatra4662 3 роки тому +2

    Jai Hind. This is just the beginning. WE INDIA ONE DAY WILL AGAIN BECOME THE GOLDEN BIRD OF MODERN ERA JUST LIKE BEFORE THE "SON CHIRAIYA".. ADN WE WILL ALSO BE THE DEFENCE MANUFACTURING HUB...

    • @Rahim-rj6ry
      @Rahim-rj6ry 3 роки тому

      Yes golden bird bilkul jo dusre mulkon me ja k chai pi k ate hei 🤣🤣🤣🙌🏼

    • @michaeljoydeepmahapatra4662
      @michaeljoydeepmahapatra4662 3 роки тому

      @@Rahim-rj6ry you know really less of history no prob India was known as the Golden bird before because it was the richest among every country... You intelligent Bi***

    • @Rahim-rj6ry
      @Rahim-rj6ry 3 роки тому +1

      @@michaeljoydeepmahapatra4662 I don't give shit about past. Now golden bird is a shitty one.

    • @Rahim-rj6ry
      @Rahim-rj6ry 3 роки тому

      @@michaeljoydeepmahapatra4662 🤣🤣

    • @actuallyidonthaveaname_9164
      @actuallyidonthaveaname_9164 3 роки тому

      @@Rahim-rj6ry ok we don't have any problem in accepting that we are weak in this era but we will rise again just wait n watch👋

  • @gohzixin3589
    @gohzixin3589 3 роки тому +4

    Why Indian media always like to compared India and China ! It so silly, obviously not wise to comparing the two as they are not in the same level. ( China GDP 5.5 times largest than India)

    • @HarshKumar-qn1jc
      @HarshKumar-qn1jc 3 роки тому +1

      Becoz its geopolitical politics, u will never understand. for better understanding u need to have a study of international politics

    • @gohzixin3589
      @gohzixin3589 3 роки тому +1

      @@HarshKumar-qn1jc You talk nonsense.
      By comparing University and High School just not at the same level, Indian Media just biased and arrogant .

  • @Colorsupidol_wigs
    @Colorsupidol_wigs 3 роки тому +1

    Superpower India! Taiwan no. 1, India no. 2!

  • @zhijianyan139
    @zhijianyan139 3 роки тому +3

    when Vikrant is ready China would havefinish building her 4th or 5th carrier

  • @Aniket2712
    @Aniket2712 3 роки тому +1

    2:36 .. this is not INS Vikrant …. It’s HMS Queen Elizabeth
    Come, F-35B on the deck! & 2 islands!! … you ran out of images or what?

  • @ganboonmeng5370
    @ganboonmeng5370 3 роки тому +3

    15 years in the making...still job incompleted ! During that time..China operationalise 3 carrier ! Hahahaha...

    • @siesta3002
      @siesta3002 3 роки тому

      Are you Chinese, why did you act like that

    • @ganboonmeng5370
      @ganboonmeng5370 3 роки тому

      @@siesta3002 I am chinese..but not from China....India have so many problems...least of it is to hv a aircraft carrier ...
      You have hungry people...cities running out of water...poor healthcare...covid....of the Indian variant ...but the corrupted politicians...needed their toys...military expenditure is the safest for corruption...as it is all cover up under top secret !
      So India need and enemy....China....Pakistan.....they tell you we have to defend our country !!!

    • @theunbeatable1755
      @theunbeatable1755 3 роки тому

      Well our old gov was slow work has been speed up under Modi due to privatization in defence sector

    • @theunbeatable1755
      @theunbeatable1755 3 роки тому

      @@ganboonmeng5370 yes don't forget how china betrayed india when we tried for peace that's why we need millatry to defend

    • @theunbeatable1755
      @theunbeatable1755 3 роки тому

      @@ganboonmeng5370 and u guys start claiming our land

  • @riturajsingh4581
    @riturajsingh4581 3 роки тому

    They should also go ahead with the 65,000 tone carrier and get new fighters as well 3 aircraft carriers will make IN serious firepower

    • @Tickson
      @Tickson 3 роки тому

      India should fix internal problems first, as well should China, working on infrastructure and wide spread poverty