Physics 37 Gauss's Law (11 of 16) Electric Flux

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 17 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 62

  • @Juxtaroberto
    @Juxtaroberto 10 років тому +33

    He misspoke but wrote it correctly: cosine of 0 is 1, not 0.

  • @joshharris9788
    @joshharris9788 2 роки тому +3

    Thank you sir..you are a great teacher..the best teachers really are invested in their students understanding the material..excellent job..

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  2 роки тому +1

      Thank you. That is what we are trying to do. 🙂

  • @sujaypurakait6878
    @sujaypurakait6878 9 років тому +3

    Really... you are one of my best teacher from now...

  • @nayireedahjet3320
    @nayireedahjet3320 6 років тому +3

    Dear Professor thank you sooo much for your incredible physics videos, you make everything much understandable, easy and fun.

  • @18myra
    @18myra 9 років тому +3

    Thank you so much for all these videos. I am very grateful. They have been a great help to me!

  • @williamash2898
    @williamash2898 7 років тому +3

    The electric field is parallel to the normal coming from the surface, not perpendicular as stated, which is why it is cos(0). If it was perpendicular it would be cos(90) which would be equal zero. There should be a note stating the correction I think.

  • @sarkersaadahmed
    @sarkersaadahmed 9 місяців тому +1

    0:53 quite confused about the cos(0) equals 0

  • @shangli7290
    @shangli7290 9 років тому +6

    I am literally watching every single topic to study for the finals, which might be 100% of my grade.

  • @daveshakibanasab7992
    @daveshakibanasab7992 8 років тому +3

    You are my Hero.

  • @yaha1313131313
    @yaha1313131313 10 років тому +2

    Why aren't you my teacher. First thing I understood all semester!

  • @barssandk8542
    @barssandk8542 6 років тому +3

    Hello professor, i think the concept of flux needs few more videos for better understanding as it is probably going to be 1 question of most of people here's midterms.

  • @owaisaly8666
    @owaisaly8666 8 років тому +1

    Great work sir

  • @randy_the_real
    @randy_the_real 6 років тому +1

    Sir I have a question: what happens if a sphere is not hollow? is there still electric flux inside the sphere body? If so, how would you calculate the total electric flux and the electric potential?

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  6 років тому +1

      There are examples like that in the playlist.

  • @deependraverma4382
    @deependraverma4382 8 років тому +1

    Sir,does Q(ins) includes the electrons present over the gaussian surface?

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  8 років тому

      Q inside the Gaussian surface equals the net charge inside the surface. (when the charge is positive, it just means that there are more positive charges than negative charges).

    • @deependraverma4382
      @deependraverma4382 8 років тому

      Thank you Sir! You are the best

  • @azgharljan1068
    @azgharljan1068 8 років тому +1

    sir d formula is same for regular and irregular surfaces?

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  8 років тому

      You need to be able to draw the Gaussian surface so that the electric field direction at the Gaussian surface is perpendicular to the surface.

  • @vanillapie8321
    @vanillapie8321 2 роки тому +1

    Is 4pir^2 only for spheres?

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  2 роки тому +1

      The area of a cirle is pi r^2 The surface area of a sphere is 4 pi r^2

  • @Garebare1
    @Garebare1 8 років тому +2

    So if the flux doesn't depend on the radius because Φ=Qin/ε0 -- but if you were to look at Φ=E•A , then the radius would affect the flux?

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  8 років тому +3

      It depends on the geometry and the context. If you have a point charge and you draw a spherical Gaussian surface around the charge, then it doesn't matter how large the radius of the Gaussian surface is, the flux through the surface will be the same.

  • @NamaSaya-wg9gn
    @NamaSaya-wg9gn 7 років тому +1

    How about electrostatic force in cavity ?

  • @philliplayton9250
    @philliplayton9250 10 років тому +6

    cos(0) is one on zero as was stated

    • @FulAlseyab86
      @FulAlseyab86 6 років тому

      It is clear he didn't mean it. If he had meant it the flux would be zero.

  • @andrewskyworker
    @andrewskyworker 10 років тому +1

    what is different between electric flux and electric field?

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  10 років тому +3

      Andrew,
      Electric flux = Electric field x area

    • @Juxtaroberto
      @Juxtaroberto 10 років тому

      The field associates with each coordinate (x,y,z) some force F due to the electric force, and this is the electric field. Electric flux is how much field is "flowing" out of a body (or through a surface).

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  10 років тому

      Juxtaroberto
      Electric flux does not "flow".
      It is simply the product of the electric field and the surface area.

    • @Juxtaroberto
      @Juxtaroberto 10 років тому

      Michel van Biezen For a constant electric field, and also in a situation in which the electric field is parallel to the area vectors of the surface, the definition of electric flux reduces to the product of electric field and surface area. But if we look at what a surface integral of a field gives you, that is a flow, or a flux. So, electric flux is the "flow" of the electric field through a surface.

    • @j0mezzy
      @j0mezzy 9 років тому

      +andrewskyworker Electric flux is kinda like the amount of electric field lines that passes through a "surface" or area. While electric field is the vector field generated by charges/objects ......

  • @azgharljan1068
    @azgharljan1068 8 років тому +1

    sir y we take the Gaussian surface??? is it must???

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  8 років тому

      For some situations the technique of the Gaussian surface makes it a lot easier to find the electric field.

  • @engzakiahmed4789
    @engzakiahmed4789 7 років тому +1

    Sir how E flux will be Zero
    and all the surface will appear zero

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  7 років тому

      Are you referring to the flux inside the conductor?

  • @Warriorpend2
    @Warriorpend2 8 років тому +4

    cos(0) is not 0, it's 1.

  • @rahultiwari9003
    @rahultiwari9003 8 років тому

    Sir is it possible to calculate flux through an open surface without using gauss theorem

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  8 років тому

      +Rahul Tiwari
      If you know the strength of the field and the direction of the field and the surface then you can simply do a dot product.
      Flux = E x A x cos (angle between the normal of the surface and the direction of the field). Gauss theorem is used to find the electric field.

    • @rahultiwari9003
      @rahultiwari9003 8 років тому

      +Michel van Biezen thanks sir

  • @sujankbball4124
    @sujankbball4124 7 років тому

    sir if the outer surface contains + charge and and the inner surface contains + charge their should be a reputation between them right?? 💭

    • @sujankbball4124
      @sujankbball4124 7 років тому

      repulsion

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  7 років тому +1

      Yes, it is the repulsion that causes the (extra) positive charge to move as far away from each other as possible.

  • @ankitavarshney5906
    @ankitavarshney5906 7 років тому +1

    sir , the electric field exert in the center of the charged spherical conductor ??

  • @ahmetcihatbozkurt8769
    @ahmetcihatbozkurt8769 7 років тому +1

    Michel dayı you are the best all of them rest

  • @philliplayton9250
    @philliplayton9250 10 років тому +1

    one not zero

  • @jadonclifton
    @jadonclifton 8 років тому +1

    sideways spaceship = flux

  • @gchips
    @gchips 8 років тому

    cos(0) = 1

  • @pierce5878
    @pierce5878 7 років тому +1

    Be my Professor plis

  • @ElifArslan-l9g
    @ElifArslan-l9g 3 роки тому

  • @surry99
    @surry99 5 років тому +1

    Why bother doing a video like this? It can be found in any textbook. He provides absolutely no insight about Gauss's Law.

    • @Dina-he1uc
      @Dina-he1uc 2 роки тому +2

      this is a very funny comment because approximately 99.9% of comments under this channel are positive, and there are too many to count about how he is a very good teacher. You go right ahead and keep reading your textbook.

    • @surry99
      @surry99 2 роки тому

      @@Dina-he1uc Do you understand what the word "insight" means?

    • @Dina-he1uc
      @Dina-he1uc 2 роки тому +1

      @@surry99 yup but take a look at the playlists. Majority of playlists on this channel require no knowledge of the subject. so videos about the basics, as u said things that are written in print, are taught here. And I appreciate that especially because I dont have a good textbook to use. Cheers.

    • @surry99
      @surry99 2 роки тому

      @@Dina-he1uc I am glad you find them helpful.
      That is the most important part.