US New $300 Million X-44 MANTA Can DESTROY The Sixth Generation Stealth Aircraft

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 5 вер 2024
  • Can the X-forty-four Manta truly destroy the formidable sixth generation stealth fighter? Recently, the United States embarked on quite an expensive investment to build the next generation of fighter jets that would dominate the skies. This new fighter is said to feature the most advanced technologies that the world has ever seen and in terms of lethality, it is expected to be designed with more lethal capabilities than the Raptor.
    Subscribe Here → / @realhyperspeed
    #Hyperspeed

КОМЕНТАРІ • 74

  • @daleshelden8394
    @daleshelden8394 Місяць тому +27

    These images are from the movie Stealth.

    • @jesusrosales9263
      @jesusrosales9263 Місяць тому +1

      😂😂😂😂😂😂 🇺🇸☝️🇺🇸☝️🇺🇸

    • @heinrichhase6852
      @heinrichhase6852 Місяць тому

      And from Ace Combat 7

    • @peerpede-p.
      @peerpede-p. 6 днів тому

      A lot of gaslighting to ease coming taxes.

  • @cliveengel5744
    @cliveengel5744 Місяць тому +8

    Funding for the X-44 program ended in 2000!

  • @becauseiwasinverted743
    @becauseiwasinverted743 Місяць тому +28

    I stopped when I heard F-24 raptor...

    • @IvanHunglin
      @IvanHunglin Місяць тому +3

      I stopped when I read your comment. Thx!

    • @joelongueira6816
      @joelongueira6816 Місяць тому +1

      Forreal❤😂

    • @davidmecham9676
      @davidmecham9676 23 дні тому

      Lamest response possible.
      Only your opinion matters. Everyone should remember that.

  • @shanefanon
    @shanefanon Місяць тому +4

    Good Job. Finally.

  • @richmurphy1681
    @richmurphy1681 Місяць тому +4

    Looks like the javalyn and cobra night raven had a baby

  • @theebalz
    @theebalz Місяць тому +3

    Don't let Lockheed Martin produce it!
    The cost overruns will skyrocket. Have Northup Grumman produce the LM design.

  • @user-ze6ro3nl1n
    @user-ze6ro3nl1n Місяць тому +3

    Love Amerika for safe world

  • @robertlesliebryant3414
    @robertlesliebryant3414 Місяць тому +4

    The " Manta " iz a Tri-angle aircraft.
    They're talking about the NGAD

  • @massoverride478
    @massoverride478 Місяць тому +2

    18:00 very interesting

  • @JustinArcher-zv3ym
    @JustinArcher-zv3ym Місяць тому +2

    X means Experimental. Its a designation for aircraft that arent going to be built only used to test new theories and technologies

  • @damongraham1398
    @damongraham1398 Місяць тому +1

    I'm curious what would a B-1 without a tail would have done?

  • @DerekJones1081962
    @DerekJones1081962 Місяць тому +2

    Of NGAD dream requirements the most demanding is the need for supercruise and the ever electrical power hungry avionics and potential to deploy laser weapons. The deficiencies of trying to shoehorn IRST sensors active visual stealth and other SCI-FI requirements of NGAD into an also robust carrier capable airframe is why the Navy, not airforce needs the lead. The power plant not the airframe is what isn't ready at this time.

  • @peribe438
    @peribe438 10 днів тому

    The idea of NGAD dog-fighting is ridiculous!

  • @sootrattlerolloff-road1415
    @sootrattlerolloff-road1415 Місяць тому +2

    The f-24 is a real plane...my 84 year-old mother is one of the test pilots! I folded one together last night and she threw that sucker from the kitchen to the dining-room!

  • @ioanbota9397
    @ioanbota9397 Місяць тому

    Realy I like this new powerful fighters jets

  • @trfmusic902
    @trfmusic902 27 днів тому

    They are upgrading F-22 Raptors so they can be more advanced and go on through the years.

  • @brianlouishaddock4551
    @brianlouishaddock4551 Місяць тому +11

    Big mistake shearing developing with, other players, this leaves the system to be cloned with file transfer,you won’t know what has been passed on to other players and will never be that far in front, showing off is. Big mistake.

    • @magnus6003
      @magnus6003 Місяць тому +3

      The biggest mistake here is assuming they haven't thought about that scenario.

    • @nolimitmotorcross9364
      @nolimitmotorcross9364 Місяць тому +3

      Remember if we are seeing this plane it’s over 30 years old so there’s even more advanced air craft no one knows about

    • @rodhancock3549
      @rodhancock3549 Місяць тому

      Sharing or shearing?

    • @walterrichards1802
      @walterrichards1802 Місяць тому

      Absolutely agree!

    • @walterrichards1802
      @walterrichards1802 Місяць тому

      300 million each, or for the entire X-44 alone? At any price, if it performs as expected, how many of them would be needed to control if not totally dominate air superiority anywhere deployed?😢

  • @rochus_wagner
    @rochus_wagner Місяць тому

    None of this will happen without Russian Titanium!

  • @bestamerica
    @bestamerica 28 днів тому

    '
    oh no no...
    not need to show currencys in here...
    NOT important about currencys...
    takeremove off the currencys

  • @JoeyRay-fz1qe
    @JoeyRay-fz1qe 12 днів тому

    Till I see a real one then I will believe it. One thing I can say the US makes the best video games equipment and claim it is real!

    • @airplanedud
      @airplanedud День тому +1

      yeah it’s not happening the funding ended in 2000

  • @josephtempongko8914
    @josephtempongko8914 20 днів тому

    Have this aircraft built first and then you can brag about it. Go back to sleep and dream again.

  • @steveeisenburger6011
    @steveeisenburger6011 Місяць тому

    Being asked a set of obvious and preloaded questions, only to then be told in the first few words ", it's no longer news,,!"
    Audi!!!

  • @FrankSliva
    @FrankSliva 24 дні тому

    Very very old movie...

  • @joeharleybermoy7058
    @joeharleybermoy7058 Місяць тому

    China is watching and they will imitate that.

  • @phillcantrell9060
    @phillcantrell9060 Місяць тому

    Another boondoggle, the bloody F-35 still can't fly through a storm and 50-60% of them are unavailable for active service due to software/hardware issues.

  • @arkbirdarcher19
    @arkbirdarcher19 29 днів тому

    x-44 is a cancelled concept bomber f-22. stop it, get some help.

  • @user-rp2nq1ev6x
    @user-rp2nq1ev6x Місяць тому

    What is it going to take to get the people in the Pentagon to pull their collective heads out of their assessment and understand that the F-35 IS NOT CAPABLE OF TAKING THE PLACE OF ANY CURRENT FIGHTER WE HAVE?????

    • @jamesgarrett5218
      @jamesgarrett5218 Місяць тому

      F-35 is designed as a multi-role fighter/bomber/close support aircraft, not a pure fighter as F-22.

  • @user-eu8yk1xx7n
    @user-eu8yk1xx7n Місяць тому

    Ljke. Ruter onship.

  • @electrolysisresearch8013
    @electrolysisresearch8013 Місяць тому

    I'm not even going to watch this video, because he didn't even do enough research to Google what (MANTA) is an acronym for.

  • @user-qr5vb3vm6e
    @user-qr5vb3vm6e Місяць тому

    Supercruze, and an oxygen tank and we fly to space

  • @chrisstrand500
    @chrisstrand500 Місяць тому +1

    Doesn’t exist

  • @lorettawhiting6787
    @lorettawhiting6787 Місяць тому

    No it will be bird of pray.thats what it will be lmao.

  • @gerritsprado1
    @gerritsprado1 Місяць тому

    America is much further them the show us. Wacht bij darts and skunkworks

  • @joelongueira6816
    @joelongueira6816 Місяць тому

    F24 raptor? Now I don’t believe anything you said 😂❤

  • @bluto212
    @bluto212 Місяць тому

    Made in China

  • @user-rp2nq1ev6x
    @user-rp2nq1ev6x Місяць тому

    What is an F-24???

  • @user-rk3wn6uh6r
    @user-rk3wn6uh6r Місяць тому

    The F-23 was much better than the F-22 Raptor, the F-22 was picked, because it was cheaper.

    • @donaldwest8130
      @donaldwest8130 Місяць тому

      In what way was the F23 better??
      How much more expensive was it vs the F22??
      Changes came so fast that the F22 electronics platform was too expensive vs starting over.

  • @user-wf3uu2tb7v
    @user-wf3uu2tb7v Місяць тому

    СТЕЛС СУТЬ ЕСТЬ - А ТАК ФИГНЯ )))))...

  • @BernieGolgo13
    @BernieGolgo13 Місяць тому

    F-24? Huh?

  • @djjammindave
    @djjammindave Місяць тому +1

    THE F35 IS SUPPOSED TO REPLACED THE RAPTOR, THATS WHAT I THOUGHT.

    • @mmedved5567
      @mmedved5567 Місяць тому +3

      Nope. Different capabilities.

    • @Taffeyboy
      @Taffeyboy Місяць тому

      Nope.

    • @aussiegta8267
      @aussiegta8267 Місяць тому

      It was never designed to replace the Raptor.

  • @xxtoooboooxx
    @xxtoooboooxx Місяць тому +2

    300 million USD each?! To defeat who? Why not defeat hunger and homelessness? Wrong priorities by such a corrupt nation... Tsk...

    • @Bellagiobic
      @Bellagiobic Місяць тому +1

      Don't let the door hit you on your ass on the way out!

    • @iamn8746
      @iamn8746 Місяць тому

      Gotta flex on communism some more 😎😎😎

    • @pappagone6066
      @pappagone6066 Місяць тому

      wunderwaffen winning in afghanistan vietnam or... banderastan?

  • @djjammindave
    @djjammindave Місяць тому +2

    THANK YOU, MR. PRESIDENT. THE BIDEN ADMINISTRATION....

    • @krishorst4734
      @krishorst4734 Місяць тому +1

      biden?? lol

    • @samedmundson6470
      @samedmundson6470 Місяць тому

      NO...his admin had nothing to do with this beyond not canceling it.

    • @jayedgar2373
      @jayedgar2373 Місяць тому

      No administration brought about NGAD or the latest 6th gen jet. Future forward is constantly evolving. The is the approach with any new aircraft/technologies. 20 year old designs today still provide a great asset to modern warfare. As technology improves, so does the aircraft. As aircraft evolve, there designs improve flight characteristics and capabilities. This is an ongoing evolution. No administration is in control of that. Hopefully, NO administration will ever impede or attempt to control that either.

    • @jayedgar2373
      @jayedgar2373 Місяць тому

      @@samedmundson6470 True