Fsr ultra performance in 640x480 with frame generation may give astonishing 25fps in 213x160 render resolution with very enjoyable 150ms input lag, you can go further and achieve over 60fps by using 4x lossless scaling, the latency will make the game feel like it was being streamed from the moon but it's smooth!
@@muhammedebrarnazli_1968 theoretically the worst GPU on the planet that "should" run this game is Intel HD 500 iGPU but that's only available in some potato mobile CPUs and the performance should be measured in frames per minute rather than second, any 6th gen and above intel CPU should at least start the game if only the intel shitty drivers will allow them to
Yeah, I was worried seeing first benchmarks but after release actually it runs pretty well, 1080 medium with DLSS Q 70-80 fps is nice. I'm more concerned that games advance too fast compared to budget gpus, with my 2060 I could run any new game in 1080p medium-high even max. Now with 4060 and new games you can't reach 60fps on max without FG. If something won't be done in 6000 rtx series you will need 6070 for high 1080p 60fps+ experience without FG
yes bc cutting edge UE5 games look better on medium than old games on very high. You cant just take medium-high settings of completely different games, made with other engines etc., and compare them with a completely new, cutting edge UE5 title's medium setting. medium isnt just medium. it doesnt mean the same in every game. New games have a way higher baselevel of visual fidelity. Many games still look good even on low, while older games usually looked completely shit on low settings. UE5 with Nanite, or Lumen, or just the insanely high level of detail in those new UE5 games, (and if you add full RT or even PT on top, the pc requirements skyrocket even more) is extremely intensive and hard to run. Thats also why UE5 titles respond so crazy good to upscaling. Upscaling is lowering rendering resolution, aka higher resolution makes the game exponentially harder to run. This is basically always true but in UE5 it reached new levels.
ALSO, factor in inflation and general increasd in prices after the C19 farce. 2017: GTX 1080ti with a MSRP of 699$ 2024: the same 699$ are 900$, from inflation alone. the production quality has increased A LOT, like the processing nodes have gotten way smaller. All this engineering, the ongoing increase in core count, in simple electronic on the cards, the quite a lot bigger coolers, all the software features that Nvidia is consistently improving, like DLSS. Wow, DLSS upscaling tech has gotten so freaking good. I have a 32inch 4k 240hz OLED monitor, I will build a 5090 pc as soon as it gets released. So think about it - even tho I will have the best possible pc - I will absolutely use upscaling wherever DLSS is available. Especially with 4k output resolution - DLSS Quality looks just as good as native, you couldnt tell any difference. Even up to DLSS Performance (so like 1080p rendering res) ooks awesome, if you scale it to 4k. FG comes on top, with a high enough base framerate it can be great, in non competitive FPS games. all this has to be paid for. so yes, if you pay only like 300$ TODAY, you wont get cutting edge performance bc its simply not realistic.
idk why everyone with 4060s always has way lower fps than me, i play with dlss and no fg and get 120 fps on very high with only particle effects, hair, and foliage turned down to medium (1080p)
1060 Should be able to Handle 1080p FSR Q + FG or you can buy lossless scalling on steam cap the game and 30 fps and use the X3 mode while setting the game to 720P FSR Q
It does deserve it... But not for unoptimised high-end AAA for 60fps.For games using properitey game engines or other highly optimized games like FH5 , it will still give decent FPS. My personal opinion is UE 5 doesn't fulfill the performance cost to visual uplift ratio
thanks for this video i have 1650 gddr6 1fan i wasnt expecting this game to run i bought it about a yer and half it didnt stop inpressing me bro you don know how your videos are realy helping thnks again
Why is it that games usually run better at native 720p than FSR quality at 1080p ? In theory it's the same resolution so the performance should be similar. Also I notice that native 720p uses less Vram than FSR quality at 1080p, so maybe that has something to do with it ?
The upscaler part of FSR also takes some resources and it ends up having lower FPS. The thing is, usually it's worth the FPS hit, since it also looks much better than native 720p, but not in this game!
Yeah. He didn't even bother to test the game in medium or high settings as medium/high settings mix might reduce pixelation caused by lower settings with fsr.
My poor 1650 laptop started sweating when i clicked on this. Surprised it runs, but then again i somehow ran Robocop and God that game needs specs..and optmization.
The game runs FSR 3.0 which is pretty much 2.2 with 0 fixes. Now that might not be true but all i know is that FSR 3's image quality was the exact same as FSR 2.2. Wished this used FSR 3.1 which has tons of fixes and improvements to the visuals.
Cool so I could play it with a 1650... This GPU is out there for 10paps max. And the CPU is 20-30 max. Which Mainboard to use? What's the cheapest one for that?
The PS5 version is using both FSR (1080p) and frame generation in the performance mode, and it's still not capable of a stable 60 fps. The result is (of course) terrible input lag, and a very blurry and noisy image. If they had lowered the settings instead, it would probably be much better, judging by how the much slower 1650 performs.
is this game in on hdd or ssd? mine is 1660 super with i5 12th gen 16gb ram its playable at medium with fsr but it drops and freezes randomly and my game is one hdd what to do..i don't have space on ssd
last breath of this ''popular'' and most affordable single slot 75w gpu. sad to see it die slowly. i'd pick one up to upgrade my 730 but.... for less than 60$ (it's price) i can get an rx 580 8gb but i can't upgrade the psu on my hp prodesk with an i5 4460 and 16gb ram. what should i do ? hang on with this or build an entire am4 pc ?
would a 1650 super make a bigger difference? i mean its only a boosted 1650 but with gddr6 may be a benefit, combined with newer specs may work better with frame gen (unlikely thought)
you are wrong about FSR versions again, 2.1 is the most stable and soft but it ghosts, 2.2 is the most pixelated one but great on static, 3.0 uses 2.2 and 3.1 uses 2.2 but has some own "soft blur" filter that tries to hide the pixelation that 2.2 has
oh man, i guess the price really is the problem not the gpu, my 4060 is like doing 150 fps in 1440p with high qual but low shadows i think its doing pretty good
why would devs make a game barely run on what google says is a medium spec graphics card... probably why only 10 million people bought it across all the available platforms, 150m on PS5, and then the hundreds of millions on Steam/Epic/WeGame..
Did not expected it to run with 30+ fps to be honest... Guess its scalable, even tho playing it like this, which dips in boss fights, is not that great
Testet the Benchmark Tool from this Game and a 3080ti on UWQHD (3440x1440)... With DLSS Set to 85 and Mixed Settings I got 50-70 FPS. Most Settings on Ultra... and raytracing off.. its horrendous how this game kills my GPU 🥵
That gt 1030 video gonna be fire in a grisp 240p at 10fps
🤣🤣
Fsr ultra performance in 640x480 with frame generation may give astonishing 25fps in 213x160 render resolution with very enjoyable 150ms input lag, you can go further and achieve over 60fps by using 4x lossless scaling, the latency will make the game feel like it was being streamed from the moon but it's smooth!
tbh more excited for the GT 710 if it can launch the game without exploding
@@Ka1zerM unfortunately, it doesn't support DirectX 12. 😅
@@muhammedebrarnazli_1968 theoretically the worst GPU on the planet that "should" run this game is Intel HD 500 iGPU but that's only available in some potato mobile CPUs and the performance should be measured in frames per minute rather than second, any 6th gen and above intel CPU should at least start the game if only the intel shitty drivers will allow them to
Me staring at my 4060: maybe I judged you too harshly
Yeah, I was worried seeing first benchmarks but after release actually it runs pretty well, 1080 medium with DLSS Q 70-80 fps is nice. I'm more concerned that games advance too fast compared to budget gpus, with my 2060 I could run any new game in 1080p medium-high even max. Now with 4060 and new games you can't reach 60fps on max without FG. If something won't be done in 6000 rtx series you will need 6070 for high 1080p 60fps+ experience without FG
yes bc cutting edge UE5 games look better on medium than old games on very high. You cant just take medium-high settings of completely different games, made with other engines etc., and compare them with a completely new, cutting edge UE5 title's medium setting.
medium isnt just medium. it doesnt mean the same in every game. New games have a way higher baselevel of visual fidelity. Many games still look good even on low, while older games usually looked completely shit on low settings.
UE5 with Nanite, or Lumen, or just the insanely high level of detail in those new UE5 games, (and if you add full RT or even PT on top, the pc requirements skyrocket even more) is extremely intensive and hard to run. Thats also why UE5 titles respond so crazy good to upscaling. Upscaling is lowering rendering resolution, aka higher resolution makes the game exponentially harder to run. This is basically always true but in UE5 it reached new levels.
ALSO, factor in inflation and general increasd in prices after the C19 farce.
2017: GTX 1080ti with a MSRP of 699$
2024: the same 699$ are 900$, from inflation alone.
the production quality has increased A LOT, like the processing nodes have gotten way smaller. All this engineering, the ongoing increase in core count, in simple electronic on the cards, the quite a lot bigger coolers, all the software features that Nvidia is consistently improving, like DLSS. Wow, DLSS upscaling tech has gotten so freaking good. I have a 32inch 4k 240hz OLED monitor, I will build a 5090 pc as soon as it gets released.
So think about it - even tho I will have the best possible pc - I will absolutely use upscaling wherever DLSS is available. Especially with 4k output resolution - DLSS Quality looks just as good as native, you couldnt tell any difference. Even up to DLSS Performance (so like 1080p rendering res) ooks awesome, if you scale it to 4k. FG comes on top, with a high enough base framerate it can be great, in non competitive FPS games.
all this has to be paid for. so yes, if you pay only like 300$ TODAY, you wont get cutting edge performance bc its simply not realistic.
idk why everyone with 4060s always has way lower fps than me, i play with dlss and no fg and get 120 fps on very high with only particle effects, hair, and foliage turned down to medium (1080p)
I asked my brother if a gtx 1060 could run this game.
He just said 480p and left
it should be a bit faster than this :)
I'll try it out!
Nope, it should be able to run, but don't get ya hopes up too high.
sounds like a stuck up ngl
1060 Should be able to Handle 1080p FSR Q + FG or you can buy lossless scalling on steam cap the game and 30 fps and use the X3 mode while setting the game to 720P FSR Q
@@zWORMzGaming can you test it on rx 6600
FSR gave the GTX1650 another 2 years of lifespan it probably didn't deserve.
It does deserve it... But not for unoptimised high-end AAA for 60fps.For games using properitey game engines or other highly optimized games like FH5 , it will still give decent FPS. My personal opinion is UE 5 doesn't fulfill the performance cost to visual uplift ratio
@@user-jm3mi5zj3e Absolutely, i'd say Unreal 5 was a complete mistake.
@@PROYECTO60 Frfr
D6 does it better than this one.
Ty for testing 1650
Thanks for watching 😃
@@zWORMzGaming lmao LMAO
@@zWORMzGaming lmaoooooooooooooooooooooo
@@TheGoomaz00000000000 ????
retired my 1650 few days ago and i already miss it
those days mann
What did you upgrade to?
@@suprotimnandyrtx 5090 bro
@@suprotimnandy 3060 12GB
@@anonyqt1006good choice am too upgrading to RX 7600💪
@@Medstudent2024 Yoo Good Choice Buddy , Happy Upgrading 🥰🔥
thanks for this video i have 1650 gddr6 1fan i wasnt expecting this game to run i bought it about a yer and half it didnt stop inpressing me bro you don know how your videos are realy helping thnks again
Wow! Finally testing the low spec card
GTX 1650 is my favourite GPU
Kindly do test this game on RTX 3060 too as it is one of the popular cards used rn. :)
It will come over the weekend 🙂
The goat of testing gpu 👍
whens thee rx 580
Literally the same gpu, different brands, so ur gonna get same fps
Either tomorrow or after tomorrow! :)
@@totallynottoji wrong, the rx 580 is wayyy more powerful than the gtx 1650, the rx 570 would be the equivilent
@@zWORMzGaming cant wait❤️❤️❤️
Stay tuned bro, be patient
Hey bro
I was waiting for you to make an gtx 1650 black myth wukong. This was my previous graphics card.
I'm waiting to see gtx 1080
This video gonna blow up in views trust me
love your benchmarks!!will you be doing a 3050 card test too?
I have gtx1660super 8gb ram i3 processor. Can I run it on my pc plz help.
Pls test 1030 750ti & rx550 which are generally the in the same range when it's come to the newer games
Thasnk you for testing my new videocard! I'm so happy that it's playable
Bro i have nitro 5(2020) 1650ti, i5 10300H and 32gb ram..60hz btw.. is their a chance??
Why is it that games usually run better at native 720p than FSR quality at 1080p ? In theory it's the same resolution so the performance should be similar.
Also I notice that native 720p uses less Vram than FSR quality at 1080p, so maybe that has something to do with it ?
The upscaler part of FSR also takes some resources and it ends up having lower FPS. The thing is, usually it's worth the FPS hit, since it also looks much better than native 720p, but not in this game!
Upscaling also has a cost.
The process of upscaling is not free, so the performance is a bit lower than just native 720p
Can you try with RTX 3050???
Can you do with Rx6600?❤
Yes, it will come :)
Tnx❤@@zWORMzGaming
Ty@@zWORMzGaming
RTX 4090 soon?
I don't have it!
Letss goo my brooo
I have 1650
My Settings - Medium Quality with FSR 3 Quality + Frame Generation ON and believe me this game looks beautiful in this settings
Yeah. He didn't even bother to test the game in medium or high settings as medium/high settings mix might reduce pixelation caused by lower settings with fsr.
What about input delay?
*Me who looks at my gtx 1650 laptop*
My laptop:
Hell nah
Hey man, can you do a sort of round-up of which GPU is the best in their price/spec range? That would mean a lot to me!
Hi, love your content kryzzp, can you please do the final fantasy 16 demo with the 4060, its on steam and apparently not really optimized
My poor 1650 laptop started sweating when i clicked on this. Surprised it runs, but then again i somehow ran Robocop and God that game needs specs..and optmization.
Thanks for this, now i'll expect to have a tad bit less fps on my 1650 since its on a laptop with 50 watts. ❤👍
I'm on a laptop, RTX 3050 Ti, do you think is worth?
Looks like the ps5 version💪🏼🔥🔥
You can also use DirectX 11 in this game, just gotta use the command line.
Can you test it with the 1080ti
Will you test out Silent Hill 2 remake when it comes out? (game with similar specs and engine)
I tested a GTX 1070 and it plays better than the 1650 GDDR6 version.
The game runs FSR 3.0 which is pretty much 2.2 with 0 fixes. Now that might not be true but all i know is that FSR 3's image quality was the exact same as FSR 2.2. Wished this used FSR 3.1 which has tons of fixes and improvements to the visuals.
Gonna beat the last boss on the gt 710? 👀
Of course 🤣🤣
2024 still rocking this card until its last breath
I can feel the miserable this would get you just by the thumbnail
*Aw shame to see this, many people use this in office PCs, will need like a 3050 6GB minimum*
Cool so I could play it with a 1650... This GPU is out there for 10paps max. And the CPU is 20-30 max. Which Mainboard to use? What's the cheapest one for that?
RX 6600 PLS
You can add -dx11 command at game options in steam settings to increase the performance by far margin
I stopped watching yo videos since i lost my rx 570. Times were good ngl.
hey broo ur vidio always amazing,when i confuse my pc support with game or not i always see ur vidio.
me so waiting u to do gtx 1050ti broo
Thank you!
It'll come over the weekend 😃
@@zWORMzGaming alright i be waitingg
i actually still have the gtx 1650 on my other pc in my hometown, still kinda holds up to this day
edit: grammar
It's not bad for optimized games or older ones. I'd avoid any AAA game from 2022 and newer though!
@@zWORMzGaming yeah true, but it still plays some indie games and those that came out from mid 2018-2020
1080ti next, please 🙏🏻
The PS5 version is using both FSR (1080p) and frame generation in the performance mode, and it's still not capable of a stable 60 fps. The result is (of course) terrible input lag, and a very blurry and noisy image.
If they had lowered the settings instead, it would probably be much better, judging by how the much slower 1650 performs.
is this game in on hdd or ssd? mine is 1660 super with i5 12th gen 16gb ram its playable at medium with fsr but it drops and freezes randomly and my game is one hdd what to do..i don't have space on ssd
thanks to you i now know that i can play the game!
6700xt please bro
Pls test 4070 ti super
last breath of this ''popular'' and most affordable single slot 75w gpu. sad to see it die slowly. i'd pick one up to upgrade my 730 but.... for less than 60$ (it's price) i can get an rx 580 8gb but i can't upgrade the psu on my hp prodesk with an i5 4460 and 16gb ram. what should i do ? hang on with this or build an entire am4 pc ?
RX 580 is more powerful than GTX 1650😮
btw thanks for the video❤
That this game with RX 580 too please👍🏻👍🏻
Yeah! Thanks for watching :)
I'll try the 580 in the next few days!
@@zWORMzGaming OKAY ❤️❤️❤️
No it’s not fuck the rx 580
would a 1650 super make a bigger difference?
i mean its only a boosted 1650 but with gddr6 may be a benefit, combined with newer specs may work better with frame gen (unlikely thought)
If possible try to test in DX11, it works pretty well with old cards!
i also have gtx 1650 but it so laggy and the image is like shattered, any tips?
You are an honest man .. Thank you ❤
i think tsr quality is bind to anti-aliasing quality?
you are wrong about FSR versions again, 2.1 is the most stable and soft but it ghosts, 2.2 is the most pixelated one but great on static, 3.0 uses 2.2 and 3.1 uses 2.2 but has some own "soft blur" filter that tries to hide the pixelation that 2.2 has
It's a shite implementation in this one. It's 3.0, looks like crap
who don't have great GPU and CPU -this will be great gaming experiance..
Plz Try GTX 1060 3gb ❤love from Pakistan ❤️
It'll get rekt!
We'll get there, I hope :D
this is why i always said the real gamer is the people who play with low fps and finish the game, not the one with high gpu lmao
How about the gamers that were that low spec gamer in their college days, but then were able to upgrade when they got big kid money?
@@Lauren_C not the real gamer anymore what can i say lmao
@@Farisss11 🥺
When the 3060 ti plz ❤
How much better is the gtx 1660 super to this gpu?
oh man, i guess the price really is the problem not the gpu, my 4060 is like doing 150 fps in 1440p with high qual but low shadows i think its doing pretty good
Respect 🤍🫡
why would devs make a game barely run on what google says is a medium spec graphics card...
probably why only 10 million people bought it across all the available platforms, 150m on PS5, and then the hundreds of millions on Steam/Epic/WeGame..
Test out Doom 2 RTX
Could a hand cam with the mouse show the input latency from frame generation?
1080p Low with FSR set to 50% res and a few settings on medium would be perfect. FG just doesn't work to make unplayable games playable.
67% already looked too bad with the noise, better use 720p native than that. Let alone 50%, avoid FSR
Looks like old meme videos that got reuploaded 50000 times and compressed to half each time. But at least it runs...?
NICE VID KRYZZP! Could you try the Mínimum and Recomended settings for this game in a video? Would be great!
Thanks!! I don't have the recommended unfortunately, but planning on buying the R5 5500 just for that video 😃
Please do GTX 1660ti next!
Thnx for gtx 1650 content
and then there's one guy who'll search the internet for how to run black myth on intel hd 4gb ram.
Did not expected it to run with 30+ fps to be honest... Guess its scalable, even tho playing it like this, which dips in boss fights, is not that great
You should try with amfm2 with lossless scaling app it reduces input lag very much compared to this game native fsr implementation
If you had set it at 69% FSR instead of 67%, it would've been a "NICE" 4K experience!
Just tested Wukong bench tool with my A580 and 11400f, this game has NO optimalisation!
At least Xess works and looks better than TSR and Fsr.
When's the rtx 3060 video?
I don't know but It feels unoptimized.
How is a 1060 better than a 1650?
Can you check rtx 3060 ti?
Nice gtx1650 still rocks 😌
I don't think it's possible to fix input lag in frame generation? That would be an entirely different technology to fix that problem, yea?
I guess! I think it'll become irrelevant in the future, but for now, there's quite a bit of input lag. It's early stages of FG
3060 VIDEO WHEN KING???
Not sure yet!
4060.
Wonder how the Titan X might do with this game….
From the thumbnail I already see that you're sad with the results 😂
1660 super when?
Will u test 1660 super
wonder what it would be like on a crt.. would have to cap fps for the motion clarity to work tho
Do not play this game on the lowest setting. It is a completely different experience. Not just in visuals but gameplay experience.
Nice Gameplay
How is the 2080 super ?
TSR is better then FSR and in this game without a RTX card is the way to go
Testet the Benchmark Tool from this Game and a 3080ti on UWQHD (3440x1440)... With DLSS Set to 85 and Mixed Settings I got 50-70 FPS. Most Settings on Ultra... and raytracing off.. its horrendous how this game kills my GPU 🥵
Try 3060 bro ❤
He tried rtx 4060 and they are basically the same only like 3 to 5 fps difference